Displaying reports 67321-67340 of 85714.Go to page Start 3363 3364 3365 3366 3367 3368 3369 3370 3371 End
Reports until 08:20, Friday 05 June 2015
H1 General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:20, Friday 05 June 2015 (18885)
End of Shift Summary

Long lock from Patrick's shift roared through all of TJ's shift and most of my shift.  Dropped out at 6:12am today (yesterday it was around 5:45am).  Here is time info for the long lock:

I ran through a couple of alignments after the last lockloss, but they have not looked great, so handing off to the Day Crew (Jim covering for Cheryl who will be in soon).

Note:  On my alignments, I mainly tweaked ETMy, PR3 (just a little), and then the BS.

 

 

H1 General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 05:40, Friday 05 June 2015 (18883)
RED Channels on SDF Overview

In the SDF Overview medm, have only (3) channels which are RED during the current lock/Science Mode segment.

  1. T Ramp for MICH FF.  I'm guessing this is from Evan's work and could probably be either accepted or reverted.  (alog#18878)
  2. IMC DOF 1Y & 2P.  These are due to changes by Robert, but it sounds like he's still investigating whether we want to stay with them.  (alog#18877)

When we are happy with these changes, we should GREEN these channels up.

H1 General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 01:48, Friday 05 June 2015 - last comment - 04:59, Friday 05 June 2015(18881)
After Hour #1 (8:45utc/1:45amPST) Status

Once again, handed a nicely locked & in-Science-Mode H1 from TJ, with a range of 54Mpc.  Have had a couple of glitches which dropped the range a bit in the last few minutes though.  (as I am typing noticed the end of a huge glitch [~8:42:30-ish utc] which took the range down to 2Mpc!  Nothing obvious for a reason why on any of the FOMs.) 

Seismically, all is quiet on the LHO front with winds below 10mph.

Noticed that the CDS Overview (on video2) must have had an old medm up because when going through checksheet and checking this window I noticed H1CALCS had no purple EXC box (mentioned to Jeff and he was surprised).  Then I noticed it was fine on my workstation.  So medm restarted on video2. 

[Time for caffeine.]

Comments related to this report
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 04:59, Friday 05 June 2015 (18882)
  • LVEA South Bay crane lights on.
  • EY lights are still on.
H1 CAL (DetChar, INJ, ISC)
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 01:28, Friday 05 June 2015 (18880)
Discussion of CAL-CS Front-End Calibration vs. GDS-LAL Low-Latency Calibration
J. Kissel, K. Izumi, E. Hall for the CAL Team

We've been studying the discrepancies between the GDS low-latency pipeline (which produces H1:GDS-CALIB_STRAIN) vs what comes out of the CAL-CS front-end real-time calibration (which produces H1:CAL-DELTAL_EXTERNAL_DQ). Please check out G1500750 for a discussion on this.
H1 DetChar (DetChar)
keith.riles@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:22, Thursday 04 June 2015 - last comment - 08:39, Thursday 09 July 2015(18879)
Narrow lines in early ER7 data
Following up this earlier report on pre-ER7 narrow lines in H1 DARM, attached is a corresponding
list of early ER7 lines and some spectra for 30.5 hours of data from May 31 through June 4 at 13:00 UTC, based
on FScans SFTs generated as of Thursday morning. 

Figure 1 shows the 0-2000 Hz spectrum for the early ER7 data with line labels according to the same scheme as before.

Figure 2 shows the mid-May and early ER7 spectra overlain without line label clutter.

Attachment 1 is the early ER7 line list (nearly identical in line frequencies but not strengths to that of mid-May)

Attachment 2 is a zipped tar file of 27 sub-band spectra for early ER7 with lines labeled.

Attachment 3 is a zipped tar file of 27 sub-band spectra comparing mid-May to early ER7 without labels.

I haven't yet digested all of the changes from mid-May to the early ER7A data (what I call ER7A here), but here are things that are immediately apparent::
  • Bounce and roll modes are greatly reduced in this ER7 sample
  • Quad violin modes are less excited in this ER7 sample
  • The previous comb with a fundamental of 36.9733 Hz (54 harmonics visible) has shifted slightly to a fundamental of 36.9725 Hz (50 harmonics visible).
  • The broad structures seen in the 280-440 Hz band are worse in early ER7 than in mid-May (due to PSL jitter, if I understood Robert correctly)
  • The nefarious OMC alignment dithers and their upconversion have reappeared in what the CW group considers to be an astrophysically interesting band (anything below 2 kHz) at frequencies of 1675.1, 1700.1, 1725.1 and 1750.1 Hz
  • Whatever dithers there were previously at 81.0000 and 310.0000 Hz have disappeared.
Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
nelson.christensen@LIGO.ORG - 08:39, Thursday 09 July 2015 (19516)DetChar, PEM
We used the coherence tool to try and see if there was a coherence between h(t) and other channels for this 36.9725 Hz noise line and its harmonics.

There is a coherence between the h(t) channel and ...
H1:PEM-CS_MAG_EBAY_SUSRACK_Z_DQ
at
36.9725 Hz * 2 =  73.9450 Hz (definitely)
36.9725 Hz * 3 = 110.9175 Hz (barely above background)
36.9725 Hz * 4 = 147.89 Hz (definitely)
36.9725 Hz * 5 =  184.8625 Hz (above background)
36.9725 Hz * 6 = 221.8350 Hz (definitely)
...
For whatever reason the even harmonics are stronger.
The mat file for the coherence is here:
https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~eric.coughlin/ER7/LineSearch/H1_COH_1116633616_1118275216_SHORT_1_webpage/data/H1:PEM-CS_MAG_EBAY_SUSRACK_Z_DQ_data.mat

For H1:PEM-CS_MAG_EBAY_SUSRACK_X_DQ there is a coherence with h(t) at
36.9725 Hz * 4 = 147.89 Hz (barely about background)
See
https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~eric.coughlin/ER7/LineSearch/H1_COH_1116633616_1118275216_SHORT_1_webpage/data/H1:PEM-CS_MAG_EBAY_SUSRACK_X_DQ_data.mat

For For H1:PEM-CS_MAG_EBAY_SUSRACK_Y_DQ there is a coherence with h(t) at
36.9725 Hz * 2 = 73.9450 Hz (barely above background)
36.9725 Hz * 4 = 147.89 Hz (above background)
36.9725 Hz * 5 =  184.8625 Hz (barely above background)
36.9725 Hz * 6 = 221.8350 Hz (above background)
...
See
https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~eric.coughlin/ER7/LineSearch/H1_COH_1116633616_1118275216_SHORT_1_webpage/data/H1:PEM-CS_MAG_EBAY_SUSRACK_Y_DQ_data.mat
 
Nothing in the other magnetometers.

Nelson, Eric Coughlin, Michael Coughlin
H1 ISC (CDS, GRD)
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:21, Thursday 04 June 2015 - last comment - 12:47, Friday 05 June 2015(18878)
MICH feedforward retuned

The MICH feedforward path into DARM has been retuned, since Gabriele recently found a nontrivial amount of coupling from 50 to 200 Hz.

First, the MICH → DARM and MICHFF → DARM paths were measured according to the prescription given here. Then the ratio of these TFs was vectfitted and loaded into FM4 of LSC-MICHFF. This is meant to stand in place of FM5, which is the old frequency-dependent compensation filter. The necessary feedforward gain has been absorbed into FM4, so the filter module gain should now be 1. These changes have been written into the LSC_FF state in the Guardian.

Details

The attachment shows the performance of the new retuning compared to the old retuning. At the start of this exercise, I had already changed the FM gain of the "old" retuning from 0.038 (in the Guardian) to 0.045, as this removed a lot of the coherence near 100 Hz.

Also, I had previously widened the violin stopband in BS M2 L, but had not propagated this change to the analogous filter in LSC-MICHFF. This is now fixed. Also note that if any change is made to the invBS compensation filter in BS M3 L, this change must be propagated to LSC-MICHFF as well.

I did not have time to implement SRCL feedforward. I suspect it would be a quick job, and could be done parasitically with other tweaking activities.

Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
lisa.barsotti@LIGO.ORG - 06:52, Friday 05 June 2015 (18884)
Coherence between MICH and DARM before and after Evan's work. 

(As far as I can tell, yes, DARM got better and the range improved..although it is not evident from the SNSH channel, as it had problems around the time of Evan's work.)

Let's see how much this coupling changes over time. 
Images attached to this comment
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - 09:57, Friday 05 June 2015 (18893)

The LSC-MICHFF_TRAMP is now set to 3 versus the snap setting of 5 sec.  This shows in the LSC SDF diff Table now and should be reverted or accepted,  Evan?

evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - 12:47, Friday 05 June 2015 (18901)

Snap setting of 5 seconds is probably better.

H1 AOS
robert.schofield@LIGO.ORG - posted 19:52, Thursday 04 June 2015 - last comment - 09:53, Friday 05 June 2015(18877)
Tuning of PSL jitter coupling

I injected pitch (270 Hz) and yaw (280 Hz) lines with the PSL piezo mirror and then tried to minimize them in DARM by adjusting values of the offsets of DOF2P and DOF1Y of the IMC WFS.  It was a bit tricky because of ten-minute alignment time scales. But we reduced the injected pitch peak height by a factor of 2, and the yaw by 5 (we cared most about yaw because the PSL jitter peaks are mainly in yaw).  The inspiral range increased by a few Mpc and the jitter peaks seemed down by a factor of a few, but I will wait until tomorrow to put in spectra in order to be sure that the improvement is stable. DOF2P was changed from 135.9 to 350 and DOF1Y from 47.5 to 200. I think we could do better with another 2 hours.

Robert, Kiwamu, Evan

Comments related to this report
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - 09:53, Friday 05 June 2015 (18892)

This change now shows in the ASCIMC SDF Table.

H1 General
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 19:50, Thursday 04 June 2015 (18876)
Ops Report

19:48 - Intent Bit set back to Undisturbed. Lock is still going strong.

H1 General
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:49, Thursday 04 June 2015 (18875)
Ops Report

16:00 - Took the chair with both H1 and L1 locked.

17:31 - L1 lost lock, so I turned the Intent Bit off for Evanand Robert to return LSC Feedfowardand tune WFS offsets.

 

This work should last about 2 hours.

H1 ISC
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:49, Thursday 04 June 2015 (18874)
Lockloss investigation of instantaneous lock-loss events during 23W operation
Hannah Fair, Stefan Ballmer

Just a few days ago the interferometer tended to loose lock at full input power (23W) in ~10 to 40min. (Hence the run is at 17.3W.)

We went back to the following lock losses:

1) Jun 02 2015 01:49:44 UTC    = GPS 1117245000
2) Jun 02 2015 03:53:19 UTC    = GPS 1117252415
3) Jun 02 2015 08:13:04 UTC    = GPS 1117268000
4) Jun 02 2015 11:33:54 UTC    = GPS 1117280050

All of them showed as immediate cause of lockloss a run-away of the MICH_Y ASC loop on a time scale of about 0.2sec. (0Plots 1-4).
However, lock losses 3) and 4) also showed a significant control signal drift in PRC2, SRC1, SRC2 (both Yaw and Pit) over about one minute time scale before the lock-loss.

We therefore suggest lowering the MICH_Y ASC gain slightly next time we try 23W, and then investigate the ASC signals, most likely for the SRC.
Images attached to this report
LHO VE
bubba.gateley@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:42, Thursday 04 June 2015 (18872)
Beam Tube Washing-Cracks in the enclosure
Scott L. Ed P. Chris S.

We found some cracks in the concrete enclosure while hanging lights this afternoon, 730 meters south of X-End. The cracks run the entire length of a single panel on both the east and west side of the tube, up approximately 2.1 and 2.3 meters respectively from the slab. Picture 018 also shows the crack extending >2" horizontally at the end of the panel.

I have not ever put anything on resource space but I do have 20 more pictures that I will attempt to download there.

Only 15 meters of tube cleaned today after moving lights and looking at the cracks. 
Images attached to this report
LHO General
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:37, Thursday 04 June 2015 (18873)
Ops
Had trouble in the morning maintaining lock in the transition to REFL_TRANS. I was going to do an initial alignment per Sheila's suggestion, but then it locked. I have not done an alignment today. Ended the shift in science mode.
H1 CDS
james.batch@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:24, Thursday 04 June 2015 (18871)
Replaced video6 computer (Range display)
The computer video6 which was used to display the Range display and the ISC guardian overview has been replaced.

The new computer is an Intel NUC, which is a 4 core i5 CPU, 16G RAM computer running Ubuntu 14.04, with a KDE display manager.  The computer has a wireless keyboard which the operator manages.  The hostname for the computer is nuc0.  This computer cannot be managed with remote desktop at this time, only with the remote keyboard.

Instructions for maintaining the displays on the computer are in the CDS wiki, under Operations/FiguresOfMerit.
H1 CAL (CAL, ISC)
paul.fulda@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:03, Thursday 04 June 2015 - last comment - 12:50, Monday 08 June 2015(18870)
DARM Coupled cavity pole expected value from Finesse model

[Daniel, Paul]

We have updated our LHO FINESSE file (https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-T1300904) to compute an estimate of the DCCP as requested by Jeff.

The DCCP value we calculated was 369 Hz. This is for a well mode matched and aligned setup.

The optics details were taken from the galaxy page for the various mirrors installed at LHO. We also tried to get some more accurate losses in the arms taken from the following documents:

Optic Loss [ppm] LHO aLOG ref.
ITMX 42 N.A.
ETMX 78 16082
XARM 120 16579
ITMY 30 N.A.
ETMY 125 15919
YARM 155 15937

The caveat here is that the DCCP value has been seen to wander depending on alignment, as was reproduced in some of Gabriele's simulations, https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-G1500641. Here Gabriele found a slightly higher well aligned DCCP value of ~380Hz. We know that the DDCP value depends on many variables (alignment, mode mismatch in SRC, arm losses etc.), some of which are not yet well constrained with measurements. 

Attached is a plot of the DARM TF from the Finesse model, which is well described by a single pole at 369 Hz.

Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - 12:50, Monday 08 June 2015 (18988)COC

This is my own reckoning of the loss measurements we've performed after the ETMs were cleaned in December. Note that these visibility measurements do not independently measure losses from the ITMs or the ETMs; they just give the total arm loss from scatter and absorption.

If these measurements are not satisfactory, we could always repeat them.

We could also repeat the ringdown measurements, but we would need to be more careful when collecting the data. Last time, the incident IR power on the arm fluctuated from lock to lock, which made the uncertainties in the inferred losses much too big for the measurements to be usable.

X arm

Loss Date Method alog Notes
78(18) 2015-01­-14 Visibility 16082 ­—

Y arm

Loss Date Method alog Notes
286(33) 2015-01­-05 Visibility 15874 Green WFS not on
125(19) 2015-01­-07 Visibility 15919
155(19) 2015-01­-08 Visibility 15937
140(16) 2015-01­-09 Visibility 15991
LHO General
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:51, Thursday 04 June 2015 (18869)
Ops
14:26 Starting beam tube washing at HNW-4-064 in ~ 10 minutes
15:11 Jim replacing video6 mac mini with NUC

15:49 Went to science mode
15:59 Beam tube washing is done for the day
H1 CDS
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:27, Thursday 04 June 2015 (18868)
h1susmc2 load all filter modules

Betsy, Pattrick, Dave

The local copy of H1SUSMC2.txt filter file was out of sync with the SVN repository. When we tried to commit it we got a "copy out of date" error. To get around this, we copied our version into a backup file, svn reverted the file, svn updated the file, copied back in our new version of the file and then were able to commit it to the repository. During this file shell game, the h1susmc2 front end computer saw the file change and flagged the CFC bit (reporting modified file). This is a latched bit, so even though we returned the file back to the original the flag persists. During the H1 down time, we loaded all coefficients on h1susmc2 to clear the flag. No change to filters were applied.

H1 CDS
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:32, Thursday 04 June 2015 (18866)
Excitation bit set on h1lsc CDS overview, but no excitation running
This appears to be from Evan opening awggui and selecting a channel. It showed up even though he never hit start. It went away when he closed awggui.
H1 SUS (ISC)
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:27, Thursday 04 June 2015 - last comment - 15:23, Thursday 04 June 2015(18863)
svn commits for E7 config control - house cleaning

Since there have been a few uncommitted commissioning changes to filter files and guardian code, Dave and Sheila confirmed it was time to commit them all to the svn since the IFO is running ~well for E7.  Dave and I are working to clear house in all subsystems.  I have committed:

All SUS.txt filter files

All 2 ASC filter files - H1ASC.txt, H1ASCIMC.txt

All 2 ASC filter files -H1ALSEX.txt, H1ALSEY.txt

All LSC.py guardian scripts

 

Note, all SUS guardians are up-to-date in the SVN.

 

When we ent to commit H1SUSMC2 it failed with an error stating file is "out of date".  So, we copied the file to a backup and did a work around:

betsy.bland@operator1:/opt/rtcds/userapps/release/sus/h1/filterfiles$ cp H1SUSMC2.txt H1SUSMC2.txtbak
betsy.bland@operator1:/opt/rtcds/userapps/release/sus/h1/filterfiles$ svn up  H1SUSMC2.txt
Conflict discovered in 'H1SUSMC2.txt'.
Select: (p) postpone, (df) diff-full, (e) edit,
        (mc) mine-conflict, (tc) theirs-conflict,
        (s) show all options: ^Csvn: Caught signal
betsy.bland@operator1:/opt/rtcds/userapps/release/sus/h1/filterfiles$ svn revert H1SUSMC2.txt
Reverted 'H1SUSMC2.txt'
betsy.bland@operator1:/opt/rtcds/userapps/release/sus/h1/filterfiles$ svn up H1SUSMC2.txt
U    H1SUSMC2.txt
Updated to revision 10745.
betsy.bland@operator1:/opt/rtcds/userapps/release/sus/h1/filterfiles$ cp  H1SUSMC2.txtbak  H1SUSMC2.txt

This however caused the FE DAQ status to show the error that the filter file had changed.  Indeed to file changed name, and then back, but we confirm that the contents of the file are the same, so we will have to hit the LOAD COEFF button on MC2 to clear the FE alarm.
 

 

Comments related to this report
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - 15:23, Thursday 04 June 2015 (18867)

The IFO was down, so we hit the load coeff on MC2 during it's walk back up to LSC_FF lock.  The IFO didn't waiver so all seems fine.

Displaying reports 67321-67340 of 85714.Go to page Start 3363 3364 3365 3366 3367 3368 3369 3370 3371 End