Displaying reports 67741-67760 of 85870.Go to page Start 3384 3385 3386 3387 3388 3389 3390 3391 3392 End
Reports until 06:33, Tuesday 26 May 2015
H1 ISC
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - posted 06:33, Tuesday 26 May 2015 - last comment - 22:45, Wednesday 27 May 2015(18613)
Trying to power up

Dan, Kiwamu, Evan

Summary

Tonight we worked on getting the interferometer back to its low-noise state. We are stable at 10 W, but there is some instability at higher powers.

Details

ITM steering

First, at 3 W we manually steered the ITMs to a good recycling gain (38 W/W), and then updated the TMS QPD offsets. We also locked the arms in green, adjusted the green QPD offsets for maximum buildup, and then updated the ITM camera references. Then we re-enabled the ITM loops in the guardian. This allowed us to power up all the way to 21 W without significant degredation of the recycling gain.

After that, we were able to consistently engage the ASC with the guardian.

Power-up issues

However, we found that at 21 W the interferomter suddenly unlocks in a matter of minutes. There seems to be no instability in the arm or sideband buildups before the lockloss. We looked at OMC DCPD signals for signs of PI, but we did not see anything ringing up during any of our short high-power locks. Some times to look at are 02:29:50, 02:59:50, 04:57:30, 06:55:00, all 2015-05-26 UTC. But any of the other 21 W locklosses in the past 12 hours follow this pattern.

We measured the OLTFs of PRCL, MICH, SRCL, and DARM before and after powering up, but they all look fine and did not change with power. For CARM, we start at 3 W with a UGF of 14 kHz with 47° of phase. Then during power-up, the electronic gain is automatically adjusted to compensate for the increased optical gain. The algorithm for this was shooting a little high, so after power-up the UGF was more like 27 kHz with 30° of phase. This is probably fine, but we adjusted the algorithm anyway, so that the UGF is placed at 19 kHz, with 45° of phase. Anyway, this did not solve the lockloss issue.

We also tried locking at some lower powers. At 15 W the interferometer lasted for about 15 minutes before unlocking. At 10 W, the lock time seems to be indefinite (at least 90 minutes).

DARM crossover

Using FM9 in ETMY L1 LOCK L (zero at 2 Hz, pole at 5 Hz), we were able to push the L1 crossover from <1 Hz to 1.7 Hz by adjusting the filter gain from 0.16 to 0.31. Measurement attached, showing before and after. This is not included in the guardian. By pushing up the crossover, the rms drive to L2 decreases from >10000 ct to about 6000 ct or so.

Other

For the record, we did not notice any kicks to the yaw of IMC REFL tonight.

Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
daniel.hoak@LIGO.ORG - 08:02, Tuesday 26 May 2015 (18614)

New Damping Settings for Bounce, Roll, Violin modes

Over the weekend we were able to re-commission the damping of the bounce, roll and violin modes.  The bounce & violin damping settings have been propagated to the ISC_LOCK guardian, and should be stable (maybe).  The roll mode settings have already changed once over the weekend, so I'll list what's been working, but your mileage may vary.

The attached spectrum (for 10W, low-noise ESD, *not calibrated*, no LSC FF, so don't study it too closely) shows the mode-damping progress.  Note this was before the 2.4k and 2.8k violin harmonics were damped.

 

Bounce modes:

After struggling to apply very narrow band-pass filters a la Jeff's approach from alog:18483, we reverted to the method of very broad band-passes.  These are loaded as FM3 in the DARM_DAMP_V filter banks.  The frequencies follow those listed by Sheila in alog:18440 (we confirmed these frequencies were correct through the course of our damping exercise).

  ETMY ETMX ITMY ITMX
Frequency [Hz] 9.73 9.77 9.81 9.85
Filters FM1 (+60deg), FM3 FM3 FM1 (+60deg), FM3, FM6 (+30deg) FM2 (-60deg), FM3
Gain -0.3 -0.5 +1.0 +0.3

The real key to squashing the bounce mode peak was to work out the damping settings for ETMX and ITMY (the optics which couple bounce --> longitudinal motion the least).  The extra 30deg of phase for ITMY turned out to be important.

 

Roll modes:

We were able to damp the ITMX roll mode, thus breaking the unpaired set of frequencies for roll modes and assigning each peak to an optic.  The ITMX roll mode wasn't rung up this weekend, so we didn't have a chance to work out damping settings.  The sign for damping the ETMY roll mode flipped between Sunday and Monday night, otherwise these damping settings were pretty stable.

For all the TMs the FM4 filter is a broad band-pass from 13.5 to 14.5Hz.

  ETMY ETMX ITMY ITMX
Frequency [Hz] 13.816 13.889 13.930 13.978
Filters FM3 (-100dB), FM4, FM6 (+30deg) FM3 (-100dB), FM4 FM3 (-100dB), FM4 ??
Gain -20 +600 -80 ??

The roll mode is rung up after every lockloss (usually it's ETMY), so these settings need to be manually applied before the transition to DC readout.  The gains listed in the table above are the "high-gain" damping state, if the mode is very rung up you need to start at a lower gain setting or you might saturate the M0 stage.

 

Violin Modes

Recall that violin mode frequencies and their associated test masses were given in alogs 17365, 17502, and 17610.

All the identified modes are well-damped and have been enabled in the Guardian code, with the exception of ITMX.  Despite many attempts I haven't been able to actuate on the ITMX modes at all.  Before the realignment/recycling gain work the ITMX modes damped very easily, now I can't find a DOF (longitude, pitch, or yaw) or a phase setting to move the modes either up or down.  It's hard to believe the L2 stage of ITMX isn't working, so we're not sure what the problem is.  Maybe we just need more patience.

The complete set of violin mode damping settings is too large to list here; the various filters and gains are recorded in the guardian code.  Some modes require a specific filter to get the right phase, others can be grouped together with broad band-pass filters without much trouble.  In particular, ITMY requires separate filters for each mode, it's very difficult to construct a broad band-pass that catches more than one mode with the correct phase.  We need to add more filter banks to the L2 DAMP section of the quad models if we want to squash the violin modes and their harmonics.

We did identify some new modes -- since we started feeding DARM back to the ETMY L2 stage we rang up the 4th, 5th, and 6th harmonics of that optic.  These modes were easily damped and have been notched in the actuation path. The specific frequencies and damping settings were:

2424.38, 2427.25 Hz: Use FM6 of ETMY L2 DAMP MODE1, +60deg of phase, +100dB, gain=+20k, longitudinal direction

2878.7, 2882.5 Hz: Use FM6 of MODE2, no phase, gain=+10k, longitudinal direction

3330.6 Hz: Use FM5 of MODE3, -60deg of phase, gain=+20k, longitudinal direction

3335.7 Hz: Use FM6 of MODE3, no phase, gain=+20k, longitudinal direction

Images attached to this comment
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 22:59, Tuesday 26 May 2015 (18630)

Keita, Sheila

In three of last night's 10 Watt locklosses, as well at the 15 Watt lockloss, the CARM loop dropped first, when IMC-F reached something around +/- 1440 kHz (the first screen shot attached is typical, 2015-05-26 15:23:17, 13:228:28, 12:10:29, and 7:38:16 at 15 Watts).  Now that Jeff has fixed the model and we are using tidal again, this type of lockloss has not been bothering us tonight. 

The slope of IMC-F is larger in the 15 Watt lockloss than the 10 Watts ones.  A trend of IMC F and arm transmission from last night shows there are some inflection points in the slope of IMC F, although these don't corespond to changes in input power or changes in the state of the tidal state machine.

The other 4 locklosses that I looked at were not due to the IMC VCO, and I didn't come up with any good explanation for them.  One notable feature in all of the others is the half a hertx oscillation in the ITM oplev damping loops, that starts when the power increased to 21 Watts, but it doesn't seem like this was the cause of the lockloss. 

Images attached to this comment
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 22:45, Wednesday 27 May 2015 (18657)

Tonight we were able to damp the roll modes with all of these settings, as well as ITMX for which we used -100 dB, bp13.9 (FM3+FM4) and a gain of 20.  We also increased the gain for ETMX to 1000

H1 PSL (PSL)
peter.king@LIGO.ORG - posted 05:43, Tuesday 26 May 2015 - last comment - 05:47, Tuesday 26 May 2015(18610)
Laser Trip Causes
The Symptoms
============

The laser is off, the chillers are running and the status screen shows either
"Interlock OK" as red, or both "Interlock OK" and "Epics Alarm" as red.



Possible Causes
===============

a) One of the safety relays in the interlock box is faulty.

b) There is a problem with the TwinCAT code controlling the chillers.

c) There is a problem with the TwinSafe code implementation.

d) Network delays in the PSL EtherCAT network accumulate to a point where
TwinSafe initiates a shutdown.

e) The turbine based flow sensor in the chiller gets stuck, registering a drop
in flow which in turn triggers the laser interlock.



The Evidence
============

a) The Dold LG5929 safety relay extension module has a mechanical life time of
20 million switching cycles and a mean time to dangerous failure of 144.3 years.
The contacts are normally open.

    Safety relays fail, they do not fail intermittently.

    Simulating an interlock box failure by switching off the interlock box
results in a sea of red on the status screen.

b) I have gone through the TwinCAT code for both chillers.  The only difference
is that there is an extra variable declared for the diode chiller.  However this
variable is never invoked in the chiller code.  The instruction sets for both the
diode and crystal chiller are the same.

c) I have gone through the TwinSafe function blocks and have not found anything
wrong with it.

d) This possibility game up because each time the laser had tripped, Patrick and
I noticed that there was 1 lost frame in the TwinCAT datastream.  However with
the laser running last week I noticed that something like 201 frames were lost
and the laser was still running.  So network delays were ruled out.

    Simulating a network delay by removing either the Rx or Tx fibre from the
Ethernet switch, results in a sea of red on the status screen.

e) The output of the flow rate sensor goes to the chiller controller via a normally
open switch.  If the flow rate is within the allowed range, the switch remains closed.
If it goes out of range, it opens and remains open until the flow rate is restored.

    For the crystal chiller, opening the flow rate switch does indeed switch off the
chiller.  Closing the flow rate switch does not switch the chiller back on automatically.
A number of fields on the status screen go red and can only be cleared by switching
the chiller back on and pressing the reset button on the status screen.

    For the diode chiller, opening the flow rate switch does switch off the chiller.
Closing the flow rate switch, turns the chiller back on.  What's more all the red
flags on the status screen go green automatically except "Interlock OK".



Conclusion
==========

Of the 5 cases outlined above, the one that seems to reproduce the observed events
is the last one.  In particular it seems that it is the flow rate sensor in the diode
chiller.
Comments related to this report
peter.king@LIGO.ORG - 05:45, Tuesday 26 May 2015 (18611)
One could well ask why the diode chiller and not the crystal chiller.  It might be
that the diode chiller, having to cool the pump diode heatsinks, may have more
accumulated particulate matter (gold flakes).  We should inspect the filter(s) at
the back of the chiller for any obvious signs of gold, or other stuff.
peter.king@LIGO.ORG - 05:47, Tuesday 26 May 2015 (18612)
The answer I received from Termotek was that the behaviour of the diode and crystal
chillers are indeed different when it comes to recovering from the flow switch opening.
Just in case I mis-understood their reply, I have a clarification e-mail pending.
H1 SUS (IOO, ISC)
kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - posted 22:09, Monday 25 May 2015 (18608)
SUS MC2 glitches intermittently

The MC2 suspension occasionally ran into a situation where some part of the suspension was kicked intermittenly for some unknown reason. I noticed this behavior this morning. I could not identify what was kicking.

The worst part is that the kicks (or glitches) seem to be gone since sometime around 14:14 local. Very bad.

 

The symptoms are:


(Checking various channels)

Apparently this behavior is different from the two DAC issues we have seen in this past week (alog 18453 outputting a high constant voltage, alog 18569 outputting a nonlinear signal). As mentioned above, I disabled ail the active loops including the LSC, ASC and the top stage damping loops. Even in this condition, the suspension still kept being kicked interminttently. I looked at VOLMONs on all the stages, but did not find any suspicious activities. Also, I checked motions of the HAM3 ISI in L, P and Y using the suspension-coordinate-witness-signals (i.e. SUS-MC2_M1_ISIWIT_L(P, Y)MON), but did not  find such a fast signal. In addition, I checked the bottom stage witness sensors of PR2 as well to see if this is some kind of table motion, but the PR2 was very quiet and no glitches were found at the time when MC2 was glitching.

 

(A test without LSC or ASC signals)

I attach a second trend of some relevant channels. This is a two-hours trend, with the top stage damping loops fully on and with no LSC or ASC signals. You can see that the wintess sensors of the bottom stage showed glitches in the first 1/3 of the trend and suddenly stopped. Since the damping loops were engaged during this periode, the VOLMONs showed some reaction of the loops and I think they are just reactions and not the cause of the glitches.

Actually, now the top stage RT OSEM makes me think this is it. Its VOLTMON showed a noticable discrete jump (by 14 counts) in the attached trend right around the time when glitches stopped.

Images attached to this report
H1 General
kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - posted 20:55, Monday 25 May 2015 - last comment - 22:18, Monday 25 May 2015(18607)
A rainbow in a red sky

Thank you, Dave, Richard, John, Gerardo and those who helped us today even though it was a holiday. These pictures are for you guys.

 

 

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
daniel.hoak@LIGO.ORG - 22:18, Monday 25 May 2015 (18609)

Here are some more photos - Evan is looking for the pot o' megaparsecs at the end of the rainbow.

Images attached to this comment
H1 AOS
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:41, Monday 25 May 2015 (18605)
h1seih45 back up and operational

Richard, Kiwamu, Dave:

Following Richard's suggestion, Kiwamu powered down the IO Chassis and removed the lid. After about 10 minutes the IO Chassis and then the CPU were powered up. I had removed h1seih45 from the rtsystab file to prevent any models auto starting. After several minutes I verified the Gen Std cards were still visible on the bus. I then started the IOP model. It came up with a minor IRIG-B excursion, which came back down in a few minutes. The Gen Std cards were still with us. I then started the user models, one at a time, with no problems.

Kiwamu and Evan are now untripping the watchdogs and starting isolation. Hopefully this will get us through to tomorrow.

I've put h1seih45 back into rtsystab. Kiwamu noted that the ADC and DAC Gen Std cards have LEDs which are on when powered up, and the DAC cards LEDs go out when the IOP is started. We should see what these LEDs mean.

H1 CAL (AOS, CAL)
sudarshan.karki@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:32, Monday 25 May 2015 (18604)
Pcal calibration

SudarshanK, DarkhanT, RickS

We performed a routine calibration of Photon calibrator photodioides (both transmitter module PD-TxPD and receiver module PD-RxPD) at Xend on 20th May and Yend on 22nd May. We will post the results of the calibration soon.

H1 CDS
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:38, Monday 25 May 2015 (18603)
diagnosing IO Chassis issue with h1seih45

Richard, Kiwamu, Dave:

the IOP model on h1seih45 has failed, it cannot see any General Standards cards in the IO Chassis when doing a software bus scan (lspci), but it can see the Contec Binary IO cards:

root@h1seih45 ~ 1# lspci -v |grep 3101

root@h1seih45 ~ 1# 

root@h1seih45 ~ 1# lspci -v |grep 3120

root@h1seih45 ~ 1# 

root@h1seih45 ~ 1# lspci -v |grep -i contec

13:00.0 Multimedia controller: Contec Co., Ltd Device 8682 (rev ff) (prog-if ff)

21:00.0 Multimedia controller: Contec Co., Ltd Device 8682 (rev ff) (prog-if ff)

2c:00.0 Multimedia controller: Contec Co., Ltd Device 8632 (rev ff) (prog-if ff)

Kiwamu went into the CER and confirmed that the h1seih45 chassis is powered up, the ADC interface cards have their LEDs lit, fans are on. We powered down the CPU and the Chassis (keeping the latter down for a minumum of 30 seconds) and then powered them back up.

This is where it gets strange. As soon as I could log back into h1seih45 I could see the General Standards cards on the PCI bus (six ADCs, two 16bit DACs). But, when the IOP model started, they disappeared from the bus and once again all I could see are the Contec cards.

controls@h1seih45 ~ 0$ lspci -v|grep 3101

Subsystem: PLX Technology, Inc. Device 3101

Subsystem: PLX Technology, Inc. Device 3101

Subsystem: PLX Technology, Inc. Device 3101

Subsystem: PLX Technology, Inc. Device 3101

Subsystem: PLX Technology, Inc. Device 3101

Subsystem: PLX Technology, Inc. Device 3101

controls@h1seih45 ~ 0$ lspci -v|grep 3120

Subsystem: PLX Technology, Inc. Device 3120

Subsystem: PLX Technology, Inc. Device 3120

controls@h1seih45 ~ 0$ lspci -v|grep -i contec 

13:00.0 Multimedia controller: Contec Co., Ltd Device 8682

Subsystem: Contec Co., Ltd Device 8682

21:00.0 Multimedia controller: Contec Co., Ltd Device 8682

Subsystem: Contec Co., Ltd Device 8682

2c:00.0 Multimedia controller: Contec Co., Ltd Device 8632

Subsystem: Contec Co., Ltd Device 8632

 

< about here the models try to startup >

 

controls@h1seih45 ~ 0$ lspci -v|grep 3101

controls@h1seih45 ~ 1$ 

Richard suggested we power the sytem down for an extended time (10 minutes) to cool everything down and run with the lid off. Kiwamu is doing that at the moment.

I'll disable the autostartup of the models, so we can manually step through the startup process.

LHO FMCS
john.worden@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:19, Monday 25 May 2015 - last comment - 16:39, Monday 25 May 2015(18601)
Water system

Kiwamu and Dan reported that there is no potable water in the OSB. It looks like the RO system went into fault on May 22 around 5:30pm and this morning the potable water tank went dry.

Kiwamu visited the water room for me and reset the RO system so it now appears to be operating normally and making water. However, the building is not yet pressurized.

I suspect the Naimco water skid will need to be reset.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
john.worden@LIGO.ORG - 13:21, Monday 25 May 2015 (18602)

Water is flowing somewhere..After the RO unit was reset the tank level started to climb but when the building was pressurized the level began to fall at an unusual rate.

Images attached to this comment
john.worden@LIGO.ORG - 16:39, Monday 25 May 2015 (18606)

We think the water system is back to normal.

Gerardo happened to be at the site when I got there so we visited the water room together to look into the problems.

We found that the water pumps were very hot and after breaking some fittings we found steam and hot water. After bleeding the system and cooling it down we restarted it and were able to immediatly build pressure.

The cause was likely a pressure switch which did not get reset during the initial startup. We'll investigate next week.

Images attached to this comment
H1 ISC
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - posted 05:31, Monday 25 May 2015 - last comment - 21:29, Saturday 30 May 2015(18599)
DARM tweaking

Dan, Kiwamu, Evan

List of things done today:

Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - 21:29, Saturday 30 May 2015 (18726)

This attachment shows the comparison between ETMX and ETMY L3 drives. Here the interferometer is locked using ETMX. For ETMY, offloading is disabled, and all shaping is disabled except for the LPF and summing network compensation. A gain of −50 has been inserted in ETMY L3 L2L.

Images attached to this comment
Non-image files attached to this comment
H1 INJ (INJ)
eric.thrane@LIGO.ORG - posted 04:11, Monday 25 May 2015 (18600)
LHO injection tests
The CW hardware injection code psinject now runs without crashing at LHO.  (Thanks, Peter Shawhan, for debugging the launch script.)  The injection pathway is turned off, but the injection code has been sending 13 standard CW signals into the CAL model since approximately 21:30 PDT.  Psinject is still running many hours later, so the code seem stable.  Additionally, all injection code has now been migrated to svn here:

https://svn.ligo.caltech.edu/svn/dac/hwinj/Details

I've tested the svn version of tinj (for transient injections) at LHO and it seems to work properly, though, additional tests are planned.  The latest version includes additional interaction with EPICS channels.  During the course of today's debugging, I determined that GRB alerts do not appear to be recorded in the channel H1:CAL-INJ_EXTTRIG_ALERT_TIME.  I have contacted Andrew Williamson to sort out why.
H1 ISC (DetChar)
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - posted 04:14, Saturday 23 May 2015 - last comment - 15:59, Sunday 24 May 2015(18592)
Back to dc readout

Kiwamu, Peter, Dan, Evan

We made it back to dc readout tonight. 3 W PSL power, DARM feedback to ETMX.

We are in the process of trying to engineer the new transition to ETMY. We were hampered by the intrusion of a large amount of 1/f3 noise in DARM, with ASD 1×10−14 m/Hz1/2 at 10 Hz. The initial portion of the lock was fine, and then the noise came. We trended various channels and looked at coherences, but could not nail down the cause. The noisy time starts at 2015-05-23 9:41:00 UTC. After about an hour, the noise went away again.

The ASC was a bit touchy. It could be engaged by hand, but with the guardian it seemed that engaging the PRM pointing loop caused several of the other loops to go unstable. Also, we gave up on the ITM pointing loops. They increased the recycling gain, but made the arm and sideband buildups less stable.

We found that there was no tidal signal being sent to ETMY. At first blush it appears to be an IPC issue.

Comments related to this report
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - 06:41, Saturday 23 May 2015 (18593)

Summary

We were able to transition control of DARM to ETMY with feedback to the UIM, PUM, and test masses, with the ESD controlled by the low-noise driver. The low-pass filtering was off, but the rms drive to the ESD is low enough that we should be able to switch it on without inducing saturation.

The philosophy was to first adjust the gain and filtering of ETMY L3 and ETMY L2 so that they each actuate identically to ETMX L3. Then we engineered an L2/L3 crossover by inserting a 30 Hz lowpass into L2, and a 30 Hz highpass into L3. From 10 Hz to 100 Hz, this makes the combined ETMY L2/L3 actuator look similar to the ETMX L3 actuator. Then we transitioned control from ETMX to ETMY in the usual way; i.e., ramping on the gain in ETMY L3 LOCK L (with the offloading engaged), and then ramping down the gain on ETMX L3 LOCK L.

Details

Although we set the binary sus switches so as to have lowpass filtering on, it was evident by comparing the TFs of ETMX L3 and ETMY L3 that the filtering was off. We didn't want to spend time debugging this BIO issue, so we undid the digital LPF compensation (see below) and proceeded with the transition anyway.

The procedure was as follows:

  • Measure the transfer function of ETMX L3 by measuring the transfer function L3 LOCK L EXC → DARM IN1.
  • Measure the transfer function of ETMY L3 by an identical procedure (with L2 and L1 switched off). Adjust gain and filter shape in L3 drivealign L2L to make it match the above ETMX transfer function from 10 to 100 Hz. We found we needed a gain of −50 ct/ct.
  • Measure the transfer function of ETMY L2 by measuring L2 LOCK L EXC → DARM IN1 (with L3 and L1 switched off). Adjust gain and filter shape in L2 LOCK L to make it match the above ETMX transfer function from 10 to 100 Hz. Kiwamu had done this previously; the result is FM6 (Q), along with another filter in L1 (FM6, Q^-1) which undoes this filter (since we are using offloaded feedback for the LOCK L filters). We needed a gain of 15 ct/ct (previously it was 20 ct/ct). FM7 in L1 LOCK L is meant to undo 20 ct/ct of gain in L2 LOCK L, so this should be retuned for the new gain.
  • Add a 30 Hz pole to the L2 drivealign L2L. Add a 0 Hz zero and 30 Hz pole to the L3 drivealign L2L. We put these in the drivealign FMs so that they do not affect the offloading.
  • Then ramp up the gain of ETMY and ramp down the gain of ETMX as described above.

In L3 L2L there is also a highpass filter at 1 Hz which cuts out the appearance of the microseism in the ESD drive. This reduces the rms ESD drive from 104 ct to more like 103 ct.

In L3 L2L, FM2 is used to compensate for the antiLP filters which are engaged in the ESDOUT FMs. This FM2 was installed only because ESDOUT is currently not correctly compensating the analog driver transfer function (since the analog LPFs are off; see above). FM2 should be removed once this is fixed.

The DARM OLTF is attached. Blue shows our "best" DARM OLTF configuration (i.e., what we use in full low-noise lock), with about 50 Hz ugf. Orange shows the OLTF we measured tonight on ETMX, before doing transitioning. The gain is intentionally low at this stage, because it facilitates ramping on ETMY feedback. Red shows what we measured with ETMY controlled by the LVLN driver. Here the DARM gain has been increased slightly. But the most notable feature here is the apparent loss of phase after transitioning. It is not immediately clear to us where this phase loss is coming from.

Crossover measurements have not been taken, and certainly there is some tweaking that we can do.

Images attached to this comment
Non-image files attached to this comment
john.worden@LIGO.ORG - 06:19, Saturday 23 May 2015 (18594)

There were some severe thunderstorms and downpours last night - Any chance this could be a cause of the noise at 9:41?

nutsinee.kijbunchoo@LIGO.ORG - 11:48, Saturday 23 May 2015 (18595)

Came in to give a tour and found that it's been losing lock at Find IR. So I took the ISC_LOCK to DOWN.

peter.fritschel@LIGO.ORG - 07:18, Sunday 24 May 2015 (18597)

Great to see you got DARM control to ETMY working!

Regarding the phase loss: take a look at one of the transfer functions pointed to in entry 18579  Besides the 2.2/50Hz pole/zero pair, Rich said there is another pole above/around 100 Hz due to the output capacitance. This will need to be at least partially compensated.

kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - 15:59, Sunday 24 May 2015 (18598)

John, we don't think that the thunderstom have caused the 1/f3 noise in DARM. In the periode we had this mysterious noise, there were no significant vibration on the ground according to the seismometers.

H1 ISC (ISC, SUS)
rich.abbott@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:08, Friday 22 May 2015 - last comment - 19:02, Saturday 23 May 2015(18579)
ETMY Low Noise ESD Driver Transfer Functions
Peter, Calum, Ben, Rich

Took transfer functions (1Hz to 10kHz, 255 points in to the DAC Drive Input on the front panel of the ESD driver, out of the respective SHV connector going to the ETM) of all the quadrant paths of the newly installed LN Driver.  The results are stored in:
/ligo/svncommon/CalSVN/aligocalibration/trunk/Runs/PreER7/H1/Measurements/ElectronicsMeasurements/
under the following file suffixes

UR -> TFSR785_22-05-2015_102054.txt
LR -> TFSR785_22-05-2015_102804.txt
UL -> TFSR785_22-05-2015_103546.txt
LL -> TFSR785_22-05-2015_105053.txt

Everything looks good as compared to the Spice model.

Also, we measured the output noise of each channel at 20Hz with and without DC bias.  Results are all consistent with the design (<40nV/rtHz at 20Hz and above) and Spice model.

0V bias/-7.4V bias
UR -> 21nV/rtHz/32nV/rtHz
LR -> 22nV/rtHz/30nV/rtHz
UL -> 23nV/rtHz/37nV/rtHz
LL -> 28nV/rtHz/37nV/rtHz

Analyzer Noise Floor 10nV/rtHz @ 20Hz

Typical output noise at higher frequencies is:
20nV/rtHz @ 50Hz, 22nV/rtHz @ 100Hz, 20nV/rtHz @ 150Hz

Noticed that there is still a discrepancy in the DAC monitors for the user model vs. the IOP.  Richard has the details and Jeff will likely follow up next week.

Once Richard sorts out the somewhat touchy vacuum interlock (he's working on that now and knows the problem), the entire system is now functional and ready for use.
Comments related to this report
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - 19:02, Saturday 23 May 2015 (18596)

Plot attached.

For the purposes of figuring out the appropriate compensation for DARM, I also plotted a simple model which just contains the effect of the LPF stage (2 poles at 2.2 Hz, 2 zeros at 50 Hz) and the PI summing node (pole at 152 Hz, zero at 3.2 kHz). The effect of the summing node is not yet digitally compensated, so that could explain the loss of phase that we saw in the DARM OLTF last night (about 50° at 200 Hz).

Non-image files attached to this comment
Displaying reports 67741-67760 of 85870.Go to page Start 3384 3385 3386 3387 3388 3389 3390 3391 3392 End