Displaying reports 71081-71100 of 84437.Go to page Start 3551 3552 3553 3554 3555 3556 3557 3558 3559 End
Reports until 17:30, Wednesday 03 September 2014
H1 ISC
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:30, Wednesday 03 September 2014 - last comment - 17:32, Wednesday 03 September 2014(13740)
Peeking down the arm (Alexa, Sheila, Kiwamu, Keita)

This is to get a good reference for the corner station alignment.

Prcedure:

Align TMSX, then ITMX, then ETMX, using arm baffle PDs.

Then steer PR3 to get the green transmission in ISCT1.

Then align IR light using PR2 and IM4/IM3 to the arm.

Results:

Green beam locked to the arm, and the green beam was steered to the right location in ISCT1 using PR3.

Good alignment slider values are:

  PIT YAW
TMSX -24.25 -315.55
ETMX 289.9 65.4
ITMX 90.9 -7.7
PR3 -245.0 -178.9
PR2 682.6 615.0
IM4 21400 -8500

PR3 slider offset used to be (P,Y)=(-279, -80) until this morning, now it's (-245, -178.9), the difference is (34, -98.9) urad.

Due to ITMX motion, the ITMX number might be off by a few urad, and the errors in PR3, PR2 and IM4 should follow ITMX via some ABCD matrix.

Comments related to this report
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - 17:32, Wednesday 03 September 2014 (13741)

The alignment based on the baffle PDs are:

  target=PD1 target=PD4 Average
TMSX (P,Y)=(-58.4, -283.7) (9.9, -347.4) (-24.25, -315.55)
ITMX (76.5, -23.2) (106.8, 9.3) (91.65, -6.95)
ETMX (277.4, 80.4) (301.4, 50.4) (289.4, 65.4)

ITMX was moving slowly but by a large amount due to the fact that the ITMX ISI was damping only, and that made it difficult to set the ITMX and ETMX angle correctly using baffle PD method.

Later ETMX and ITMX were aligned to TMSX such that the green light is locked to the cavity.

The green transmission was hitting the swiss cheese baffle, and we used PR3 to clear the baffle hole and put the beam at about the right location on ISCT1.

Without doing anything the green beam is hitting SR3 and maybe SR2 on the video.

H1 ISC (IOO, ISC)
lisa.barsotti@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:47, Wednesday 03 September 2014 (13739)
Alamode files for H1 single bounce configurations
The message is still the same as before (without TCS, the mode matching to the OMC in single bounce is expected to be worse for ITMX than ITMY), but for posterity I add here the alamode files I made with the mode propagation from the IMC to the AS port for ITMX and ITMY single bounce configurations. The IO parameters come from previous measurements and models that Paul did. 
Non-image files attached to this report
LHO VE
kyle.ryan@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:34, Wednesday 03 September 2014 (13738)
Opened Corner Station to X-end Station (at the request of others)
~1100 - 1200 hrs. local
Valved-in IP12, valve-out X-end turbo, dumped GV20's unpumped gate annulus volume into pump cart and opened GV20  

~1200 - 1315 hrs. local 
Valved-in IP1, IP2, IP6, valved-out YBM turbo, valved-out XBM turbo, dumped GV7's unpumped gate annulus volume into pump cart and opened GV7
LHO General
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:01, Wednesday 03 September 2014 (13737)
Ops Summary
08:41 Hugh to HAM5 to unlock HEPI
09:07 Fire department on site
09:24 Jason starting optical lever work
09:43 Hugh out of LVEA
10:08 Betsy and Travis to quad test stand
11:30 Jeff K. to end Y to check status of illuminator
~13:00 Karen to mid Y
13:30 Fire department on site
13:40 Karen done at mid Y
13:50 Richard and fire department to LVEA
14:05 Richard and fire department out of LVEA
15:00 Safety meeting

- X arm opened (WP 4826)
H1 SUS (SYS)
jameson.rollins@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:59, Wednesday 03 September 2014 - last comment - 10:09, Thursday 04 September 2014(13735)
SUS guardians now set alignments, 'MISALIGNED' states re-added

At the request of local commissioners, I have modified the SUS guardian code to go back to handling the setting of alignment offset values for the ALIGNED state, and have re-introduced the MISALIGNED state which sets the alignment offset to saved misaligned values.  This all was originally in the SUS guardian code, but was removed at LLO due to precieved problems with the SUS guardians handling the offsets.  The LHO commissioners, on the other hand, prefer the SUS guardians to have separate ALIGNED and MISALIGNED states.

SUS guardians have not been restarted yet.  Only SR2 for testing.  We're waiting until after the arm alignment tests are done.

NOTE: ALIGNED and MISALIGNED offset values MUST BE SAVED in order for the SUS guardians to restore to them! This is the big change by going back to this configuration.  When the SUS guardians were not touching the offsets, there was no worry that they would accidentally be reset.  Now that they are being set by guardian, we have to remember to always save the offsets appropriately after tweaking them.  Forgetting to save them could result in the current alignment being lost if the suspension trips or the alignment state is cycled.

As a bonus, the SUS guardians will use the notification USERMSG to notify you if the alignment has been changed and not saved.

Here's the current SUS state graph:

This is all just a stop-gap until we get a better comprehensive solution to the alignment offset problem.  This will likely be discussed in the next SYS meeting, on 9/9/2014.

Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 10:09, Thursday 04 September 2014 (13755)

All the SUS guardians have now been restarted

H1 ISC
kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:00, Wednesday 03 September 2014 (13736)
a small filter correction on RFPD LF signals

I noticed that the anti-whitening filter for the LF signal of the resonant RFPDs were all consistently inaccurate. So I fixed it.

before: zpk([2.4], [0.24], 1, "n")

after: zpk([2.4], [0.2], 1, "n")

I did this for all the resonant RFPDs, including REFL_A, REFLAIR_A, POP_A, POPAIR_A,  ASAIR_A and IMC_REFL. This seems to have fixed the issue of ASAIR_LF going below zero watts.

H1 SYS
jameson.rollins@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:50, Wednesday 03 September 2014 - last comment - 11:50, Wednesday 03 September 2014(13721)
GUARD_OVERVIEW guardian overview screen upgraded, OK status added, moved to new location

I have updated the GUARD_OVERVIEW screen to reflect the addition of the new node OK bits.  The change can be summarized with the new legend.  Note the third indicator on the right:

The last indicator will be green if the node is OK, or orange if it is not.  This change has been propogated throughout the GUARD_OVERVIEW screen:

Note that most all SUS and SEI nodes are OK, while we still need to set NOMINAL stages for the ALS and IAS ("initial alignment system") nodes.

The white panels are nodes that are currently being commissioned, and should be available imminently (the H1 "IMC" node will be renamed to "IFO_IMC" to match LLO).

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jameson.rollins@LIGO.ORG - 11:49, Wednesday 03 September 2014 (13727)

I forgot to mention that I also moved the GUARD_OVERVIEW.adl into its new location:

$USERAPPS/sys/common/medm/GUARD_OVERVIEW.adl

Hopefully we can converge on this one as common for both sites.

H1 SEI
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:33, Wednesday 03 September 2014 - last comment - 12:00, Wednesday 03 September 2014(13733)
WHAM5 HEPI Unlocked. Position Loops NOT closed, Open loop drive to alignment

Unlocked the WHAM5 HEPI and then ran Range of Motion measurement.  1mm for most DoFs, V1 0.9 & V4 0.8mm.  Elected to not run linearity test, looked good in April.  Attempted to run through commissioning scripts to close the position loops but there is a bad L4C and I'll need to replace that and rerun the transfer functions.

Meanwhile I updated the Cartesian position targets to the more recent stopped time, although these saw only small changes since I updated the targets in July.  And, I've driven the outputs (Cartesian basis in the Isolation filter section) to the target positions.  The rotational DoFs are all within a few 100nrads and the translationals are within a few umeters.  Feel free to tweek the OFFSETs on the Isolation filters if further tuning is needed.

Comments related to this report
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - 12:00, Wednesday 03 September 2014 (13734)

Safe.snaps updated for both the HEPI and ISI for HAM5.  The ISI is controlled by guardian; HEPI is manual.

H1 CDS (DAQ)
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:43, Wednesday 03 September 2014 (13731)
CDS model and DAQ restart report, Tuesday 2nd September 2014

model restarts logged for Tue 02/Sep/2014
2014_09_02 11:27 h1fw1

unexpected restart of h1fw1

H1 SEI (DetChar)
krishna.venkateswara@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:22, Wednesday 03 September 2014 (13729)
H1 EX BRS Update
K. Venkateswara, J. Kissel

I'm starting to look at how ground rotation affects the ISI stages and what improvements could be achieved with rotation sensor. I considered the data taken on Aug 21, 2014 night. I took three 10k second sets starting from GPS time: 1092707816. Initially I took the following channels:
H1_ISI-GND_STS_ETMX_X_DQ
H1_ISI-GND_BRS_ETMX_RY_OUT_DQ
H1_ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_X_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ

I then made ASD and coherence plots as shown in the attached file for each of the three sets. The seismometer velocity data has been multiplied with (2*pi*f)/g to convert to units of radian. Stage 1 had the "TBetter" isolation filters (see alog 11400). HPI was in the 'floating' state.

In the first data set, the ground rotation was quite small and BRS/GND_STS are very quiet in the 10-100 mHz range. Stage 1 however has very large motion in this range. There is no coherence between Stage 1 and BRS/GND_STS up to ~0.2 Hz, after which it shows strong coherence with the GND_STS.
In the second and the third data set, ground rotations were larger as seen in the BRS/GND_STS channels, but Stage 1 performance and the coherence looks identical to the first. It is clear that in this state, Stage 1 noise (in the 10-100 mHz band) is not due to ground rotation.

The final plot shows the coherence between Stage 1_T240_X and Stage1_T240_RY, HPI_IPS_X and HPI_IPS_RY showing very good coherence below 0.2 Hz.

After discussing further with Jeff, and reading P1200040-v40 (by F. Matichard et al, very useful document!), it seems that the above result is expected when the HEPI is in a floating/open loop state. Please look at pages 28-30 which states that HEPI tilt-horizontal coupling corner frequency is ~0.2 Hz when it is in an open loop state.

Here's my rough interpretation of what is happening: Stage 0 and subsequent stages can be thought of as a boat floating on pool of water (or hockey puck on an air-bearing table). If you stand inside the boat and move a table on the boat, the entire boat will move w.r.t. the walls of the pool, from momentum conservation. In addition there is known tilt-horizontal coupling below 0.2 Hz, so linear motion of the boat produces rotation below 0.2 Hz. As the TBetter isolation loop is trying to isolate down to 50 mHz (and amplifying motion in the 10-100 mHz band), the net result is large rotations of Stage 1, which have nothing to do with ground rotation. 

Where is this excess noise coming from? I'm not sure, but there are a number of candidates: it could be displacement sensor noise of Stage 0/1, actuator/force noise of HEPI, thermal gradients across HEPI springs and so on. Regardless of the noise source, I feel that HEPI floating (with fc~0.2 Hz for rotation) and TBetter filter (isolating to 50 mHz) is probably not the optimum configuration for good low-frequency isolation, given that we may now be measuring ground rotation precisely.

I'm very new to this so I hope others will correct me if I'm mistaken. It would be very useful to try out the HEPI closed-loop configuration and HEPI locked rigid states with BRS measuring ground rotation to understand this issue more clearly.


Non-image files attached to this report
LHO General
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:39, Wednesday 03 September 2014 (13730)
installation meeting notes
Jeff K. working on charging measurements at end Y
X arm opening temporarily
in vacuum SRM noise investigations
cable pulling for cameras and illuminators
3IFO assembly work
Jason to align PR3 optical lever, then work on HAM4
Jim W. working on ITMX SEI control loops
Fire department taking RAFAR temporarily out of service to allow cable pulling
Safety meeting at 3
H1 PSL (PSL)
richard.savage@LIGO.ORG - posted 06:36, Wednesday 03 September 2014 (13728)
PSL maintenance/tune-ups
PeterK, RickS

Yesterday (Tues) morning, we adjusted the alignment into the PMC to minimize the reflected light level with the cavity locked.
We adjusted the two steering mirrors immediately upstream of the PMC.  Neither was locked before, but we locked them this time when we finished.
Maybe this will help with the alignment drifts we have been experiencing.  Min. REFL DC level was 0.375 V locked, 2.3 V unlocked.

We then did a cursory alignment into the reference cavity and saw a significant improvement using the two mirrors downstream
of the PMC (again, neither of which was locked).  Trans. level 2.08 on MEDM screen.
We looked at the FSS OLTF and adjusted the gains to 15/30 dB Fast/Common.  Even with the common gain at the max level of 30 dB,
the UGF is only about 320 kHz.  Phase margin about 50 deg.

We installed the insulation end caps on the reference cavity.  This may provide some passive improvement in the temperature stability.

With JeffB (operator on shift) we adjusted the ISS reference level to 2.00 to account for the increased light level resulting from the PMC
input alignment and locked the ISS loop.  The diffracted light level was about 7.4 W and the loop appeared to be functioning properly.
This reference level will have to be adjusted to keep the diffracted light level in the 6-10 W range if the PMC alignment drifts (reflected
light level increases).  0.01 on the reference level is approximately 1% (maybe 1.3%) on the diffracted light level.

We need:
AA batteries for the computer keyboards and trackpads.
15 ft. SMA/SMA cable for the RFPD to TTFSS servo module cable so we can move the module to the floor (and get this heat source off
of the table).
10 ft. SMA/BNC cable for the ISS AOM to AOM driver cable so we can move the module to the floor and get this heat source off of the
table surface too.
H1 ISC
kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - posted 22:06, Tuesday 02 September 2014 (13726)
SRY locking

Sheila, Kiwamu

H1 SYS
jameson.rollins@LIGO.ORG - posted 20:38, Tuesday 02 September 2014 - last comment - 20:38, Tuesday 02 September 2014(13705)
Guardian core upgraded; most nodes restarted

This morning I put in upgrades for both guardian core (r1076) and cdsutils (r322).  All guardian nodes have been restarted (except for ITMX SUS and SEI which are under test by Jim W.  Will restart as soon as he's done).

cdsutils r322 new improvements/features:

guardian r1076 improvements/features (see also LLO aLOG 13930):

Here's the updated guardian control screen that comes with this upgrade:

Note the new "NOMINAL" state field.  The NOMINAL state is NONE by default if not set in the code module (which is the case here for SUS_BS).  The orange background reflects the fact that the new OK bit is False, which in this case is because there is no NOMINAL state set.

Also note the number fields to the right of the state names, which show the numeric index for the current states.  Now that we manually set these numbers, they have a bit more meaning, which is why it's useful to display them.

We now need to go through all systems and add appropriate state indices and nominal state definitions.  This was done already at LLO, so I'll be adopting the same standards.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jameson.rollins@LIGO.ORG - 17:59, Tuesday 02 September 2014 (13717)

ITMX SUS and SEI nodes have now been restarted, although the SEI is currently tripped as Jim W. is still working on tuning their loops.

H1 SUS (ISC, SUS)
brett.shapiro@LIGO.ORG - posted 20:08, Tuesday 02 September 2014 (13724)
New quad matlab model with fiber violin modes

See https://alog.ligo-la.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=14409

H1 SUS (COC, DetChar, INS, SYS)
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 20:07, Tuesday 02 September 2014 (13723)
H1 SUS ETMY Charge Measurement with Ion Pump reopened
J. Kissel

Picking up where Borja left off, I've measured the charge H1 SUS ETMY test mass / reaction mass system. Today's measurement is made in hopes of seeing if the ion pump is the smoking gun causing all the charging noise. Driving quadrant-by-quadrant, and using the optical lever's Pitch and Yaw signals as my response, with a 0.02 [Hz] binWidth, with 5 (instead of 3) ensuring I had a coherence of at least 0.75 (i.e. an relative amplitude uncertainty of less than sqrt((1 - 0.75)/2*5*0.75) = 18%), and taking 5 bias data points (instead of 4), I arrive at the following effective bias voltages:
      P [V]     Y [V]
UL   104       149
LL   129       72
UR   110       13.6
LR   104       117
For some reason Pitch had much better SNR for the same drive amplitude, but given that I accounted for the coherence, both pitch and yaw are to be believed. I'm not sure, however, why pitch shows such a uniform charging distribution, where yaw reports the charge is spread unevenly.

I'll gather more measurements and plot the results against Borja's previous measurements tomorrow. Since we expect this to evolve with time, there's not to much point in putting it up against the ion pump closed results just yet.

I've got some clean up functions and scripts to do, bear with me while I catch up to what Borja had assembled. I could have ask him for his analysis scripts, but it was easier just to write my own, given that the analysis is so simple. Still no automation of this measurement, and given the first-day-back barrage of Q&A, it took me ~4 hours to complete the measurement. I expect this will go faster once I gather my stride. As usual, it's a toss up between "let's just get the answer now" and "take the time to debug the automation." I elected for the former.
Non-image files attached to this report
H1 ISC
kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:38, Tuesday 02 September 2014 - last comment - 11:35, Wednesday 03 September 2014(13714)
MICH angular motion

I did some math to figure out how much ITMX, ITMY and BS may have been moving (in a frequency band of 0.1-1 ish Hz) in their angles according to fluctuation of the DC light observed at the dark port when the Michelson was locked.

(Summary)

Wednesday night (August 27th)

Friday night (August 29th)

 


(Some math behind it)

Suppose the Michelson is locked on a dark fringe. If an ITM is misaligned by Ψ, this introduces a displacement and tilt in the reflected beam with respect to the one from the other ITM at the BS. The displacement is x = 2 L Ψ and the title is ϑ = 2 Ψ where L is the distance from the BS to the ITM. So we get a small amount of 01 or 10 mode at the dark port on top of the 00 modes. Since the effect on the resultant 00 mode in its power is proportial to 4th power of the displacement and tilt, we assume the 00 mode to vanish because of the locking loop. The only residual we obtain at the dark port is the 01 or 10 mode whose field can be written as

E10 = 1/sqrt(2) ( x/w0 + i * ϑ / ϑ0),

where w0 is the waist size and ϑ0 is the divergence angle respectively. A factor of 1/sqrt(2) upfront comes from the BS reflection. If we plug the definition of x and ϑ into the equation, we get

E10 = sqrt(2) ( L/w0 + i / ϑ0Ψ.

Squaring the above, one can get the dark port power as

P = 2 ( (L/w0)2+ (1/ ϑ0)2Ψ2

Note that P is already normalized by the input beam power or equivallently the bright fringe. The Rayleigh range of the beam around the BS is roughly 210 m (if my math is correct). This gives a waist size of 8.4 mm and divergence angle of 40 urad.  The ITM-BS distance L is about 5.34 m where I averaged out the Schnupp asymmetry. So the dark port power can be now explicitly written as

P = 1.24 x 109  Ψ2

This is the equation I used for deriving the numbers listed at the very top.

For example, if one wants to explain a 16% DC light fluctuation observed at the dark port by an angle deviation in ITMX(Y), the misalignment should be Ψ = sqrt(0.16 / 1.24 x 109 ) = 11.4 urad. In the case of the BS, the effect gets twice bigger due to the fact it affects both X and Y beams at the same time in a constructive manner.

Comments related to this report
lisa.barsotti@LIGO.ORG - 11:35, Wednesday 03 September 2014 (13732)ISC
Nic, Lisa

Somehow I was confused by Kiwamu's final numbers, so we went through the math again. Kiwamu is correct. The 11 urad seemed huge for a 16% power fluctuation, but
Kiwamu is referring to 16% power fluctuations with respect to the BRIGHT fringe..so it is indeed huge. 
Images attached to this comment
H1 ISC
kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:21, Saturday 30 August 2014 - last comment - 20:53, Tuesday 02 September 2014(13685)
PRMI carrier locked for the first time

Nic, Kiwamu coolcool

We locked the PRMI on the carrier light for the first time.

 


(Variable finesse technique turned out to be good to start)

Since I have been unsuccessful in locking the PRMI in the past two or three days, I wanted to try some other locking technique. We tried LLO's variable finesse technique (see LLO alog 11340) which seemed more reliable than randomly adjusting the gains and triggers. It turned out that it almost repeatably locks the initial low finesse PRMI. Very nice. We then fiddled with the MICH gain which needed some gain correction as we got rid of the offset in the MICH locking point.


POPAIR_B_LF fluctuated a lot presumably due to some misalignment in some optics. POPAIR_B_LF was about 20000 counts in average and ASAIR_B_LF stayed approximately 3000 counts in average. After 15 minutes or so, we lost the lock for some reason, we did not have a close look.

The attached is a video of ASAIR when the PRMI was in lock.

Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - 01:31, Saturday 30 August 2014 (13689)

The final configuration (i.e. the MICH locked on a zero-offset point) is shown in the attached screenshot.

Also, we newly installed a 100 Hz low pass filter in POPAIR_B_LF because high frequency noise in POPAIR_B_LF saturated the BS actuator through the normalization.

Images attached to this comment
kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - 01:50, Saturday 30 August 2014 (13690)

When the simple Michelson is locked on a dark fringe, POPAIR_B_LF is typically 120 counts. So the recycling gain is (20000 counts) x (Tp 3%) / (120 counts) = 5 which seems too small. Clipping loss somewhere ?

daniel.hoak@LIGO.ORG - 07:55, Tuesday 02 September 2014 (13694)
lisa.barsotti@LIGO.ORG - 20:53, Tuesday 02 September 2014 (13725)ISC
For the records, with 60W in the L1 recycling cavity, without the BS baffles the BS drift in PRMI carrier lock was about 5 urad (see LLO entry 9920). This is the only H1 PRMI carrier lock collected so far, but the only drifts we see are ~0.5urad.
Images attached to this comment
Displaying reports 71081-71100 of 84437.Go to page Start 3551 3552 3553 3554 3555 3556 3557 3558 3559 End