Displaying reports 701-720 of 89074.Go to page Start 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 End
Reports until 11:20, Monday 13 July 2026
H1 OpsInfo (SPI)
jennifer.wright@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:20, Monday 13 July 2026 - last comment - 20:32, Monday 13 July 2026(90995)
SPI laser unshuttered

Jennie W

 

As per work permit #13412 the SPI laser has been unshuttered using the shutter controller on the floor behind the R4 electronics racks.

This is to monitor SPI alignment as the pumpdown continues and uses powers below 100 mW.

See photo showing the demodulated signals for the Rreference and Measurement SPI interferometers after the laser was unshuttered at 18:08:11 UTC.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jennifer.wright@LIGO.ORG - 12:26, Monday 13 July 2026 (90998)SEI, SPI

After consulting with Jim I set the guardian to take HAM2 and 3 to isolated at 19:23 UTC. They had been damped so this will change the HAM2-3 relative alignment a bit.

jennifer.wright@LIGO.ORG - 12:47, Monday 13 July 2026 (90999)

This caused HAM 3 tp trip so both ISIs have been taken to DAMPED.

Right ndscope is the QPD on HAM3, you can see the alignment changed massively when it tripped and then went back after both ISIs were taken to DAMPED.

Left ndscope shows the HAM2 QPD which doesn't have a big change between damped -> isolated -> damped.

Images attached to this comment
jennifer.wright@LIGO.ORG - 14:15, Monday 13 July 2026 (91001)

Here is the plot for the GS13s on HAM3 as it tripped.

Images attached to this comment
arnaud.pele@LIGO.ORG - 14:59, Monday 13 July 2026 (91004)

The RY blend filter was still set to the CRS damping path BLND7, so I changed it back to the nominal BLND4 path. Even after this change, the ISI was still ringing up.

Looks like the it's the Z loop that is unstable at 14.74Hz (see pictures). Having a good plant measurement will help retune the loop to avoid this ring up. If HAM3 needs to be isolated before then, the Z loop can be ran without the boost filter, which seem to be triggering the instability.

Images attached to this comment
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - 20:32, Monday 13 July 2026 (91016)

I think this ring up could be due to HEPI being locked on that chamber. I think this happened after the last vent as well. Could be that just adding a notch to the cps low pass will let us isolate the ISI. I will need a little bit of time to do some measurements.

H1 TCS
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:18, Monday 13 July 2026 (90992)
CHETA PDs

Matt, Camilla

We updated H1:AWC-ITMX_PD_{A,B}_TRANSIMPEDANCE and H1:AWC-ITMX_PD_{A,B}_RESPONSIVITY as per D2500105, as attached. 

Images attached to this report
H1 General
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:51, Monday 13 July 2026 (90994)
LVEA is Operations Phase Laser SAFE

Per WP13409, I've transitioned the LVEA to Operations Phase Laser SAFE according to M1100115, meaning all viewports, tables, and bellows have been checked that they're closed and beams are allowed back into the vacuum envelope. However, as the corner volume is pumping down and HAM1 is still at-air, I did not unlock/open light pipes or turn back on auxiliary lasers (CO2, HWS, etc.).

H1 SEI (SEI)
ibrahim.abouelfettouh@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:45, Monday 13 July 2026 (90991)
HEPI Corner Station Pressure Dipped, Spiked and Recovered Again

Over the weekend, there was another HEPI corner station dip/spike which prompted the verbal alarm notification. This last happend on Friday (alog 90984)

This time, the PS2_PRESS1 (red in attached plot) dipped by 10PSI before recovering. The bottom row of the plot are the controllers. Tagging SEI.

Images attached to this report
LHO General
ibrahim.abouelfettouh@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:38, Monday 13 July 2026 (90990)
OPS Day Shift Start

TITLE: 07/13 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
OUTGOING OPERATOR: None
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: MAINTENANCE
    Wind: 5mph Gusts, 1mph 3min avg
    Primary useism: 0.01 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.06 μm/s 
QUICK SUMMARY:

IFO is in IDLE for MAINTENANCE

Plan today is to continue pumpdown. Other tasks:

 

LHO VE (VE)
jordan.vanosky@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:47, Friday 10 July 2026 (90989)
Continued Corner Pumpdown

Restarted Corner pumpdown this morning ~8:08 am

Starting Pressure at PT180: 390 Torr

Stopping Pressure at PT180: 32.7 Torr

Today's pumping time: 9 hours and 25 minutes

Mobile ISP1000 pumps are isolated and powered off for the weekend. Turbopump station and backing scroll pump are powered on and isolated from the main volume.

Images attached to this report
H1 SQZ
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:22, Friday 10 July 2026 - last comment - 14:53, Thursday 16 July 2026(90986)
SQZ beam profiles with different centering on ZM2, ZM4 strain guage wheatstone bridge adjusted, periscope adjusted

Wed afternoon Nergis and I went to SQZT7 to get a couple of beam profiles after the ZM4 preload was adjusted, before the ZM5 swap. 

We took two measurements with the same psams settings but different centering on ZM2, based on what Camilla and Madi did in 90946 .  The data labeled as  nominal position is for these sliders where Camila reports that the beam on ZM2 is 5.85" off the table, and the data labeled raised is for these sliders where the beam is actaully lowered to 5.75".  The center of ZM2 should be 5.5" off the table.  M^2 went from 1.35 to 1.28 horizontal and 1.25 vertical with the improved centering, and the relative astigmatism also improved from 0.13 to 0.02 Ryan found the definition of relative astigmatism on page 122 (pdf page 129) of the BC207 manual here.

ZM4 strain guage was saturated when the PZT was much above 100V, so this morning Daniel came to SQZ racks with Ryan and I and changed some resistors, Daniel will add the details.  ZM4 strain guage is now working well, with values between -4.1V to 2.7V, and Ryan turned the servo back on. 

Yesterday morning, I noticed that for some psams settings, the beam was clipping on the top periscope mirror and that then we measured quite high M^2 values.  I wondered if clipping on that persicope could explain more of our M^2 measurements.  Today Ryan Short and I carefully aligned the psams to get the beam centered on the two irises on SQZT7.  We raised the top periscope mirrors, and Ryan adjusted both periscope mirrors to get the beam well centered on the irises again.  When we did this, we noticed that only one of the bolts that holds the top periscope mount to the periscope structure was tight.  

After this Ryan and I did another round of profile measurements with the new preload and working strain guage on ZM4.  We took 5 points over the range of ZM4 with ZM5 PZT at 100V, with the ZM5 strain guage not working, then took 3 points with ZM5 at a strain guage of -4.5V which is 20V on the PZT, because the ZM5 strain guage is working there we can compare these to measurements taken before ZM5 stopped working.  

Unfortunately, even after moving the periscope mirror the M^2 values are in the range of 1.4 to 1.23, so the clipping on the periscope mirror wasn't the explanation for the high M^2

 

Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
daniel.sigg@LIGO.ORG - 10:50, Monday 13 July 2026 (90993)

The little box attached to the PSAMS driver for ZM4 had a 88.6K and a 751 Ohm resistor in series between pins 11 and 24 (sstrain gauge readout and ground). This was replaced by a 227K resistor to better balance the bridge circuit.

sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 14:53, Thursday 16 July 2026 (91076)

Here is a plot of the data taken after the ZM4 preload adjustment.  The line of 5 new points was taken with the ZM5 PZT at 100V, where the strain guage wasn't working, which doesn't correspond to any of the strain guage values from the previous data set.  The 3 points taken at ZM5 strain guage at -4.5V should corresond to the previous ZM5 setting that thery are near.  It would be very helpful to get this data for ZM5 values closer to good mode matching, but at first glance it seems like the ZM4 pre-load change moved us in the correct direction.  

Images attached to this comment
H1 SPI
jennifer.wright@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:36, Friday 10 July 2026 (90987)
Corrected DIFFDISP channel readback on SPI main screen

Jennie W

While trying to debug some other SPI readout problems I noticed that the main SPI overview screen had one of the readback channel names wrong.

The 'DISP OUT' block in red at the right of the screen should readout the channel 'H1:SPI-H23_DIFFDISP_DIAG_INMON' and 'H1:SPI-H23_DIFFDISP_DIAG_OUT16' in its bottom row.

These were reading out the channel above 'REFNULL' in boith cases. I corrected this in SPI_CUST_OVERVIEW.adl file and committed to the svn. In the picture the readouts are circled on the right with the channels they readout shown on the left in the filter banks.

Images attached to this report
LHO General
ibrahim.abouelfettouh@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:30, Friday 10 July 2026 (90988)
OPS Day Shift Summary

TITLE: 07/10 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
INCOMING OPERATOR: None
SHIFT SUMMARY:

IFO is in IDLE for MAINTENANCE

Pumpdown continues - see attached screenshot

Ryan S, Sheila and Daniel also did some work at SQZT7

In other news,

LOG:

Start Time System Name Location Lazer_Haz Task Time End
14:57 VAC Jordan LVEA N Continuing Pumpdown 23:56
15:12 SEI Shrey LVEA N Seismometer Tests 18:06
15:19 FAC Dawn, Kim LVEA N Technical Cleaning 16:00
16:01 FAc Kim LVEA N Technical Cleaning 16:59
17:26 SQZ Daniel, Sheila, Ryan S LVEA N SQZT7 18:19
18:19 SUS Mitchell LVEA N \ 18:29
20:19 SQZ Ryan S LVEA Local Transitioning to local laser hazard, then SQZT7 periscope mirror moving 22:37
20:33 SQZ Daniel LVEA Local SQZT7 20:39
20:39 SQZ Sheila LVEA Local SQZT7 Periscope mirror moving 22:37
20:46 FAC Randy LVEA Local Checking on fitted plates 21:00
23:09 PCAL tony PCAL Lab Local Sorting 00:09

 

Images attached to this report
H1 SEI (SEI)
ibrahim.abouelfettouh@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:53, Friday 10 July 2026 - last comment - 12:27, Friday 10 July 2026(90984)
HEPI Corner Station Pressure Dipped, Spiked and Recovered

Ibrahim

Got a message at 14:58 UTC to "Check HEPI pump station pressures".

At 14:58,

I checked the End Stations too but nothing was seen (also attached).

 

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
ibrahim.abouelfettouh@LIGO.ORG - 12:27, Friday 10 July 2026 (90985)

Per Jim's request, here are HEPI Pump Controllers at the time of the pressure dip/kick.

Images attached to this comment
LHO General
ibrahim.abouelfettouh@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:35, Friday 10 July 2026 (90982)
OPS Day Shift Start

TITLE: 07/10 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
OUTGOING OPERATOR: None
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: MAINTENANCE
    Wind: 7mph Gusts, 3mph 3min avg
    Primary useism: 0.01 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.08 μm/s 
QUICK SUMMARY:

IFO is in IDLE for MAINTENANCE

No specific tasks today since it's RDO Friday for most

Corner pumpdown yesterday afternoon (alog 90979)

LHO VE (VE)
gerardo.moreno@LIGO.ORG - posted 02:58, Friday 10 July 2026 (90979)
Corner Pumpdown Started

(Jordan, Travis, Richard, Filiberto, Randy, Gerardo)

Corner pumpdown started Thursday afternoon, around 4:40 pm local time.
We setup the twin mobile ISP-1000 scroll pump stations at the YBM turbo station, we chose this area due to the real estate available, the other 2 stations are a bit crowded.  After setting up all of the required equipment the pumpdown was started with procedure E2300169, to setup the turbo pump unit for the pumpdown, then Jordan and Filiberto covered procedure M1300464 to make sure all high voltage DC power supplies were off, then continued following E2300443 to start the pumpdown with the ISP-1000 scroll pumps through the YBM turbo pump.  Pumpdown was done for about 2 hours taking us down to 340 Torr.  The pumpdown was stopped at 7:02 pm local time for the night.

No issues to report during the startup of the pumpdown, however something to note is that during the blow down of the vacuum envelope the system was not pressurized, last minute work on the different chambers did not allowed to pressurize the envelope. 

Images attached to this report
H1 DAQ
jonathan.hanks@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:46, Thursday 09 July 2026 (90978)
WP 13401 Starting a daqd run number server on our container cluster

As per WP 13401.  In preparation for upcoming daqd upgrades I'm working to move the run number server off of h1daqscript0 and onto the HA container cluster.  I have the new instance running with the current run number database.  I just need to configure the framewriters to point to it.  I will do that next week.   The run number server helps keep the run number that is put into the frames consistent between the two frame writers.

This is a step to retiring the h1daqscript0 machine once we remove the daqd's px dolphin.

LHO VE (VE)
travis.sadecki@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:03, Thursday 09 July 2026 - last comment - 17:32, Friday 17 July 2026(90967)
HAM7 A1F1 and A2F1 viewports removed and blanked off

Per FRS 38164, the unused viewport located at A1F1 and A2F1 on HAM7 have been removed and blanked off.  These viewports are being moved to HAM3, so serial number, etc. will be recorded in a separate aLog.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jordan.vanosky@LIGO.ORG - 08:45, Friday 10 July 2026 (90983)VE

The HAM3 A1F3 viewport was a coated ZV-800 which had many small scratches on the vacuum side of the window, we replaced this with the HAM7 Uncoated ZV-800 SN R136. The A1F4 viewport was a D1100999 High Quality viewport (O-ring sealed), it was determined that this port no longer needs the high quality viewport and was then swapped with the other removed viewport from HAM7 (ZV-800 Uncoated R134).

Per Betsy, both of these ports are only used for views inside the chamber, so Uncoated viewports could be used to replace the two coated viewports which were removed.

The viewports removed from HAM3 will be inspected on the bench and if they pass inspection criteria they will be put into spares inventory.

Images attached to this comment
melina.fuentes-garcia@LIGO.ORG - 17:32, Friday 17 July 2026 (91098)

After confirming with Jordan, the comment above has a small typo: The viewport that came off of HAM7 port A2F1 is recorded in LHO's inventory lists (LIGO-T1200220 and LIGO-E2400096) as SN R146 (not R136 as listed above).

As a visual indicator of these swaps: 

HAM7 A2F1 SN R146 → (removed and moved to) → HAM3 A1F3

HAM7 A1F1 SN R134 → (removed and moved to) → HAM3 A1F4

H1 AOS
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:55, Thursday 09 July 2026 - last comment - 04:44, Friday 10 July 2026(90966)
HAM3 DOORS PUT ON YESTERDAY JUL 8th, 2026

Late entry for VAC - Gerardo, Travis, Jordan, Tyler and Randy put the doors on HAM3 yesterday afternoon.  They did -Y first, then +Y.  Getting the doors craned over and transferred to the Forklift could only happen at the corner near the TCSy table, so was a tight fit at that transfer point.

These were the last doors to go on for this vent window.

Well done team.

Comments related to this report
gerardo.moreno@LIGO.ORG - 04:44, Friday 10 July 2026 (90980)VE

(Travis, Jordan, Tyler, Randy, Richard, Gerardo)

We did not touch the blue cross members.

Doors went on as smooth as they could.  The first door -Y side, where the bulky optical lever next to HAM3 adds a degree of difficulty to install the door (maybe more than one degree).  Nothing to report, flanges look good on both sides, door and chamber, O-rings have lots of tiny metal shavings incrusted on them, however they did not cross the sealing surface, we opted not to poke at them.  We found a small hex key inside the chamber, finders keepers.  The second door for +Y side went on good, after we figured the angle of attack for the forklift, we running out of turning room next to this chambers.  On this side of the chamber as we were removing the aluminum O-ring protectors a small section of O-ring decided to pop out of its groove around 6 O'clock, when Jordan was working to place the O-ring back in he found a tiny, very tiny metal washer, he grabbed it and we handed it to Richard, we also found a peek wire clamp at the bottom of the chamber (example shown at the bottom of the second photo), that one we just tossed out of the chamber.  No issues noted with the flanges on door and chamber.  O-rings have similar particulate on them as the O-rings on the -Y door, did not poke at them either.

For both doors we inspected their respective viewports from the inside, we found a viewport with a high density of scratches on the coating, and we decided to remove it and replace it, see entry Travis' entry.

A nice feature that we noticed and made world of difference from previous installations is the enhancement to the cleanroom, it sits a bit taller allowing for good clearance of forklift's mast during the installation of both doors, and we did not have to move the cleanroom.

Images attached to this comment
H1 SUS (SUS)
kenneth.cardona@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:09, Thursday 09 July 2026 - last comment - 18:10, Thursday 09 July 2026(90964)
BBSS cross coupling transfer function comparison between L1 and H1

Ken, Preeti, TJ

We've made transfer functions to see and compare the level of cross coupling between P and Y at both sites for the top stage of BBSS. The L1 traces were rescaled to match the H1 magnitude for the PtoP comparison at 0.1Hz. The scaling factor was 3.72. This was done to compensate for the DAC differences between the sites. All of the L1 traces were multiplied by this scale factor. All plots are found in the attached PDF. 

Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
kenneth.cardona@LIGO.ORG - 17:51, Thursday 09 July 2026 (90976)

TF plots corrected to have consistent axis scales

Non-image files attached to this comment
timothy.ohanlon@LIGO.ORG - 18:10, Thursday 09 July 2026 (90977)

LHO data taken from /ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/BBSS/H1/BS/SAGM1/Data/2026-07-06_1500_tfs. BSC2 ISI was locked and measurements are taken in air

LLO data is taken from /ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/BBSS/L1/BS/SAGM1/Data/20260706_BBSS_1TOR. BSC2 ISI was fully isolated and the chamber was under vacuum at about 1 Torr.

LHO VE (VE)
gerardo.moreno@LIGO.ORG - posted 22:30, Thursday 25 June 2026 - last comment - 05:22, Friday 10 July 2026(90768)
CP1 Cooldown Update

(Jordan, Owen, Jake, Gerardo)

The cryotrap cooldown continues, we continue to pump on the cryotrap volume with a turbo pump, the turbo is backed with a SS500 aux cart.

Small changes were the removal of the calibrated leak from the RGA tree, along with the removal of other components in preparation to install an incoming small ion pump next week.

Current pressure in the cryotrap volume is 7.38X10-10 Torr.

 

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jordan.vanosky@LIGO.ORG - 16:59, Monday 29 June 2026 (90814)VE

Jordan, Jake, Owen

The RGA tree was removed and replaced with the dedicated 75 l/s Starcell ion pump and a pumpdown port for the pump tree.

All flanges were helium leak tested, no He signal above the leak detector background were found. (~1.5E-10 Torr-l/s)

Volume is currently being pumped by a small aux cart, and the ion pump will be powered on tomorrow. The volume will then be introduced to the cryopump volume once the pump pressure reaches ~E-9 Torr on ion pump alone.

 

 

Images attached to this comment
gerardo.moreno@LIGO.ORG - 05:22, Friday 10 July 2026 (90981)VE

Update for CP1.

Last Tuesday 7/7/26, Jordan removed the turbo pump and introduced the small ion pump to the CP1 vacuum volume, this closed the warm up of CP1.  Attached plot of small ion pump controller and pressure reported by the cold cathode at CP1.

Images attached to this comment
H1 SEI
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:40, Tuesday 24 June 2025 - last comment - 11:39, Monday 13 July 2026(85300)
Comparing HAM1 ISI motion to HAM1 Passive stack TT L4Cs

I did a very quick search and didn't find any other posts, so I putting a plot here comparing the motion of the pre-vent HAM1 TT L4C passive stack motion to the current HAM1 ISI motion. ISI motion is generally 1-3 orders of magnitude better, only with a very narrow window at 15hz where the passive stack barely reached down to the ISI motion, but only for the x dof. Blue, green and brown are the ISI, cyan, pink and black are the passive stack.

Almost done with the st0 feedforward, X,Y,Z and RY are running. Still have to do tilt decoupling (which will improve low frequency motion), vac work at the chamber kept tripping the ISI during my measurements this morning.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jennifer.wright@LIGO.ORG - 11:39, Monday 13 July 2026 (90996)

Jim redid this measurement with data from 28/08/25 in order to get a good comparison for the Sep 2025 LVK. Posting here for continuity.

The old data was taken on 2025-03-30 at 22:57:46 UTC with 10 averages and a BW of 0.0468748 Hz.

The data post installing the ISI on HAM1 was taken on 2025-08-28 at 08:22:38 UTC with 10 averages and a BW of 0.0468748 Hz.

Non-image files attached to this comment
Displaying reports 701-720 of 89074.Go to page Start 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 End