SUS (Arnaud and Dave)
Cleaned up SUS QUAD models and added optlev input into L1 and L2 fourosem parts. Recompiled, installed and restarted the models h1susitmx, h1susitmy, h1susetmx, h1susetmy. We are leaving the common model QUAD_MASTER.mdl a local mod for now and not commiting to SVN.
GDS: Jim:
New version of GDS installed, please see Jim's entry for details
DAQ (Dave)
DAQ was restarted to take the SUS changes.
Conlog (Dave)
Conlog was reconfigured for the new channel list.
LDAP (Jonathan and Dave)
The CDS LDAP server was reconfigured to define user groups.
Model/DAQ restarts as of time of writing:
2014_04_01 12:39 h1susetmy
2014_04_01 12:39 h1susitmy
2014_04_01 12:42 h1broadcast0
2014_04_01 12:42 h1dc0
2014_04_01 12:42 h1fw0
2014_04_01 12:42 h1fw1
2014_04_01 12:42 h1nds0
2014_04_01 12:42 h1nds1
2014_04_01 12:51 h1susitmx
2014_04_01 12:52 h1susetmx
Here is the status of the YEND pumpdown.
Roughing started at 18:20 utc on the 29th The cold cathode(PT410B) trace begins at 3:40 utc on the 30th.
See attached PT410B data.
For reference here is the XEND data from January - https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=9154
Data viewer allows me to offset a data set by 120 days in order to display both the X and Y pumpdowns together.
At first glance it looks like YEND (green) is slower than XEND(red) - however, not shown is the pause during roughing of XEND. Correcting for this delay lines up the two curves as shown in the second plot.
The correction on the plot is 1 day while the delay in roughing was approximately 18 hours.
Values in the system manager are flat lined. There are multiple lines of errors in the EPICS IOC of the following (screen shot attached): Error code 4: ~~~MYSTERY ERROR!!!~~~ Go Google "ADS return codes"! and Error code 1861: ~~~MYSTERY ERROR!!!~~~ Go Google "ADS return codes" Googling "ADS return codes" gives: 4 Insert mailbox error No ADS mailbox was available to process this message. Reduce the number of ADS calls (e.g ADS-Sum commands or Max Delay Parameter) 1861 timeout elapsed Check ADS routes of sender and receiver and your firewall setting
Recovered BSC1, BSC3, BSC9 and BSC10 after ITMX, ETMX, ITMY, and ETMY SUS models restart.
We measured the WFS sensing matrix yet again.
ETMX PIT | ITMX PIT | ETMX YAW | ITMX YAW | |
WFS A | -2062 | 1114 | -584 | 985 (23 degrees) |
WFS B | -1158 | 694 | 617 (good coherence) |
1061 |
The green ones are consitent acros the measureemtns we've made to within a factor of 2. ETMX PIT is the most consistent WFS B pit signal, the sign has stayed the same but the gain has changed by a factor of 3 .
We have some new settings for the Comm Handoff, so I repeated the usual measurements:
COMM PLL Servo Board
CM Servo Board
LSC-CARM Filter
LSC-REFL-SERVO-SLOW
MC2_M3_LOCK_L
MC2_M2_LOCK_L
MC2_M1_LOCK_L
MC2_M3_ISCINF
The UGF of the comm handoff is now 3kHz with 80 deg phase margin. The crossover between the fast and slow path is at 13 Hz with 19 deg phase margin.
The gds tools (awggui, diaggui, diag, etc) have been updated to 2.16.12 to provide access to the dmt servers using dmtviewer. The dmtviewer program connects to dmt servers specified by the DMTWEBSERVER environment variable. Since the dmt servers are not part of the cds system, a kerberos ticket is required to access the servers. The command "kinit username" where username is your LIGO.ORG username will give you a ticket. Don't forget to use the command "kdestroy" when you're finished to remove the kerberos ticket.
Chris, Sheila
Our measurements of the COMM noise with the WFS locked have an rms of 20Hz, measured down to 0.1 Hz. To make sure this was reasonable, we turned off the refl bias path so that the laser was locked only to the green beat note. The transmitted power fluctuations are noticably less than the HWHM of 40Hz, so this seems believable. (StripTool is the second screenshot attached).
We wanted to try locking the arm half way down the fringe so we could make a measurement of the noise using the transmitted power. Since the IR trans PD is normalized to 1 when the cavity transmission is maximized, the calibration of this signal is just a high frequency gain of 84 (FWHM of the arm cavity), and to correct for the refl bias loop gain we have a pole at zero and a zero at 3Hz. The correct calibration has a more complicated frequency dependence, so we would have to do the real calibration to make a comparison above about 42 Hz. Neither of these traces have the cavity pole at 42 Hz corrected for. You can see that the side of fringe measurement agrees with the normalized refl PD signal well up to 100 Hz . (1st screen shot attached)
We repeated the measurement in the normal configuration, where we lock on resonance using the refl bias path, and the noise is the same (30Hz rms down to 0.02Hz). The RMS is dominated by the pitch mode, so we will work on increasing the WFS bandwidth tomorrow. Tonight we tried OpLev damping (this added noise around 1 Hz) and turning up the pitch OSEM damping gains (inconclusive so far).
We redid the measurement with the WFS outputs held, and saw that the noise was high again (100Hz rms down to 0.1Hz), with the WFS on again we were back to the low noise state. So we can safely say the WFS are helping.
We also checked that the noise is the same from 3-100Hz with and without the refl bias path engaged.
Arnaud, Apollo, Thomas We made a lot of progress on the ETMY OL, the receiver is 90% finished with only a cable left to run from the whitening chassis to the QPD but we've confirmed all the mechanical components fit well together. The transmitter pylon ended up being too close to the viewport to fit all the parts (nozzles, adapters and bellows) so we need to move it back a few inches to work but that requires moving a pipe bridge, Apollo is going to start on that tomorrow morning. We are still on track for a full working system by tomorrow night, which includes calibration and whitening.
Alexa, Sheila, Keita, Fred, Chris
This morning after we moved the WFS, Alexa remeasured the sensing matrix and got (in counts/urad):
ETMX PIT | ITMX PIT | ETMX YAW | ITMX YAW | |
WFS A | -1809 | 828 | -896 | 894 |
WFS B | -362 | -311 | 370 (coherence 0.7) |
712 |
We also checked the phasing by injecting a signal to the laser frequency (through the PDH servo board) and looking at I and Q from each segment. Then we struggled to lock the loops.
Later on we remeasured the sensing matrix again, several times. We saw that the measurement isn't particularly sensitive to the centering on the WFS. We tried using DTT to do the exicitation, and tried using AWGGUI and letting the excitation run for a few minutes before we took the measurement to avoid any trasients, but that also did not seem to have a big impact.
Some elements were consistent (within 20-30%) each time we measured and consistent between Alexa's morning measurement and the after noon measurements. These were EMX Yaw to WFS A (-900counts/urad average) and ITMX yaw to WFS B (562 counts/urad average) ETMX yaw to WFS B consistently was small and didn't have much coherence, so we have set it to zero. Each time we measured ITMX YAW we got a magnitude of 700-750, but the phase varied, (136, -134, -38, -21, 19). We decided to also set this to zero, and now have a yaw matrix that is just: -1.1 WFS A to DOF 1 (ETMX Yaw) and 1.897 WFS B to DOF2 (ITMX Yaw). This seems to be working OK.
For pitch we got values for WFS A that are consistent with Alexa's measurement from this morning, but not for WFS B. For WFS B PIT we got -630 to -853 coutns/urad ETMX pit and 566 counts/urad ITMX pit, a sign flip compared to the earlier measurement.
Right now we have all four DOFs locked, using the new YAW matrix and Alexa's measurement from this morning for PIT. This seems to be stable, we pushed the gain up a little, so the current gains are -0.002 DOF 1+2 Y , -0.002 DOF 1 PIT, and 0.005 DOF 2 PIT. These have been locked with good build up for about 20 minutes.
I have left 2 excitations running, on ITMX Yaw we are injecting 1 count at 3 Hz into the L2 Lock Yaw filter, and for ETMX 0.3 counts at 1.5 Hz. Hopefully this will stay locked a good part of the night so that we can look at how stable the sensing matrix was overnight.
Aidan. Thomas. Greg. Eric G. Dave H.
Flow meter issue
Wired up flow meter. The wiring was
CO2 Controller Chassis
Leaky laser was enabled
Laser (SN 20510.20816D) was run. Maximum output power was 49.4W
Beckhoff issues
CO2 binary outputs not working - traced problem to Beckhoff System Manager not mapping CO2 output hardware to PLC variables.
Plumbing
It actually takes a large number of ducks to be in a row to turn these CO2 lasers on. So here's how to do it ...
Ensure that the laser power cables are connected from the Instek Power Supply (Mech Room) to the CO2X table feedthroughs and, inside the table, connected to the RF driver
The success of this can be gauged by checking:
Jim Warner, Greg Grabeel Hugh noted there were some issues with a limited range of motion on HAM 4. Jim and I checked for rubbing but were not able to find anything readily apparent. We replaced the parker valve on the NW corner horizontal actuator. At ~2:45pm we started running the actuator in bleed mode. At ~4:30pm we changed the valve positions to run mode. There were no leaks on the parker valve. I did an air purge on the accumulators shortly after switching over to the run state. Jim will be running linearity and transfer function tests to see if this fixes the issues.
That should read resister stack and not accumulator.
ETMY ISI tf running from opsws0, should run til mid-morning. HAM5 ISI tf running from opsws1, should run in slightly less time. HAM4 HEPI local basis test running from opsws2, just a couple of hours. Anyone care to join a pool on which ones crash, with extra payout for guessing the reason?
- 9:30 am Travis, Gary, Giles and Margot to the LVEA, West bay monolithic work.
- 10:05 am Dale +1, to the LVEA, tour the LVEA.
- 12:33 pm Aaron to Y-End, check on OpLev cable.
- 12:50 pm Thomas and Arnaud to End stations, X-End to pick up tools, then to Y-End optical lever work.
- 12:55 pm Karen to Y-End.
- 1:14 pm Travis and Margot to Y-End, tool retrieval.
- 1:45 pm Travis, Gary, Giles and Jason to LVEA, west bay area for monolithic work.
- 1:55 pm John to LVEA, west bay area, monolitich work inspection.
- 2:37 pm Andres to LVEA, 3rd IFO parts search and retrive by HAM3.
- 3:22 pm Dale and Margarita to LVEA, LVEA tour.
- 3:22 pm Cyrus to X-End, to retrieve dead imac.
Andres R. & Jeff B. We made several centering adjustments to the BOSEMs and reset all to 50% light. The latest set of transfer functions show the undamped coupling issues in the 03/25/14 data have been reduced or eliminated. The plots for the last set of TFs are attached below. The plots for the power spectra taken on 03/25/14 are also included.
Because the spectra looked suspicious in the low frequency band, I retook some data from yesterday with SR3 on the test bench (M3 osems were disconnected), and compared it with the last measurements. In fact, the feature is not present anymore (green after vs blue before).
Other than this, spectra and transfer functions look acceptable for installation.
I upgraded and rebooted the tape backup machine this afternoon to clear up a problem which turned out to be just the tape head needed cleaning. The strange thing is that I cleaned the head just three days ago, I'm not sure why that didn't appear to take.
I've installled OS updates on opsws0,7 and operator1, and moved opsws0 and operator1 to the workstations subnet. These were the machines missed in the last round of updates. All of the control room workstations have now been moved to the new subnet.
Margot and I performed all of BSC10 closeout tasks listed in my previous alog regarding this closeout. We pulled the FC from the ETMy optic a little after 11am, and the door was going on at ~1:30. It took "so long" (ha) because we ended up having to spend some extra time calling in the troops about one of the ISC viewports having what appeared to be a scratch on it's inside surface. More details to come as needed.
Here are some further pictures of the ACB swing back and the FirstContact spray cone attachment to the HR side of the ETMy QUAD structure from yesterday. Yes, the cone protrudes into the baffle. Yes, Margot still was able to fit her head and an arm with the spray bottle in the cone.
The last picture shows the placement of the horizontal wafer and verticle 1" witness optic in the center of the chamber, placed today just before the door went on the chamber.
Notes and dcc numbers for Contamination Control Samples (ones that came out and ones that went in) to WBSC10 before doors went on: 1. Vertical 1’’ optics on QUAD: T1400246 (SN1195) out and T1400247 (SN 262) in. 2. Vertical 1’’ optic under quad: T1400248 (SN261) placed at end of closeout. 3. Vertical wafer on quad: T1400249 attached to quad under HR of ETM. 4. Horizontal wafer on floor under quad:T1400250 placed at end of closeout. 5. Horizontal 1’’ optic: T1400251 was left on beam tube floor between BSC10 and BSC6. Looking up SN/history. Didn’t take it out, because we had no clean optic containers handy. 6. 24’’ PET swipe sample taken in tube near purge today close to end of closeout. Labeled, and taken to PET microscope area.