Displaying reports 72261-72280 of 83002.Go to page Start 3610 3611 3612 3613 3614 3615 3616 3617 3618 End
Reports until 17:48, Friday 28 March 2014
H1 ISC
alexan.staley@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:48, Friday 28 March 2014 (11073)
WFS Comissioning

(Alexa, Daniel, Sheila)

We measured the WFS sensing matrix for both PIT and YAW. The matrices were computed by exciting ITMX/ETMX PIT/YAW at 1.5Hz with 0.3 amplitude, and looking at the WFS transfer function. The results can be found in the following DTTs saved in /ligo/home/sheila.dwyer/ALS/HIFOX/WFS/:

Inverting the results gives...

YAW input sensing matrix:

-2.294    -3.155

0.529     -2.604

PIT input sensing matrix:

-0.494    -0.239

0.302    -0.489

These values are in microradians; however the factor of 1e-3 is taken care of in the gain of the filter module. We also adjusted the signs as follows:

Under this configuration, with all four DOFs engaged (DOF 1,2 P,Y) the WFS_A/B_I_YAW/PIT_OUTMON all converge to zero. The lock appears to be stable with a transmission betweeen 950 to 1050 counts. Futher investigation needs to be done...

H1 TCS (TCS)
aidan.brooks@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:35, Friday 28 March 2014 (11074)
TCS CO2X laser install - leaking laser housing, issue with flow meter, chiller settings, Beckhoff

Aidan. Dave H. Greg G. Thomas V.

We have, basically, finished installing all the electronics and cabling on the TCSX table. There are a few outstanding issues (summarized in the attached PDF). The ones that are preventing us from turning on the laser are listed below.

  1. For some reason, the flow meter is not outputting a sense current (current proportional to the measured flow). This means that the CO2 controller, D1200745, is registering low flow and preventing the laser from being turned on. We're not sure if this is a faulty connection at the terminal block in the meter or if there is a deeper problem. We will continue investigating on Monday. The connections are shown in photo 1.
  2. The TCS Beckhoff unit is, apparently, running but is not connecting to EPICS. We need to be able to access the software on/off switch to turn the laser on.
  3. We don't currently have the viewport IR sensor that plugs into the CO2 laser controller, D1200745. We can bypass this input by changing a jumper on the board.

We hope to address all these early on Monday to get the laser running to check the output power.

Chiller settings:

We adjusted the bypass valve on the back of the TCSX chiller to achieve the following settings (to mimic what's at LLO)

Flow rate: 3.4GPM

Pressure: 60.5PSI

Laser housing leak.

The replacement laser installed on the TCSX table also has a slow leak from the laser housing (in the same place as the first one) - about 1 drip every 5 minutes. We will check the output power of this laser before we pull it. See photos 3 & 4

Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
H1 SEI
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:55, Friday 28 March 2014 - last comment - 11:45, Monday 31 March 2014(11070)
HAM3 ISI trip

This trip happened around the time of a beckhoff restart.  A beckhoff restart causes a crash of the IMC guardian, which causes it to stop.  Its not clear to me why this should cause MC2 to get a large signal, but it seems to.  This causes a cascade of trips.  Even though I don't know why this happends, creating a safe state in the IMC guardian so that it handels missing channels better could help with the problem. 

Another solution is to have the SUS WDs not trip HEPI.  Can we get that fix soon?

HAM2 also tripped at the same time, Jeff and Hugh brought that back. 

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jameson.rollins@LIGO.ORG - 17:54, Friday 28 March 2014 (11075)

To be clear, IMC guardian did not "crash" in this particular situation.  The guardian responded exactly as it's currently programmed to respond, which is to go into ERROR when it looses communication with any of the channels it's monitoring.  I want to distinguish and ERROR condition, which is something that guardian handles, to a "crash", which means that the guardian process died unexpectedly.

Here's my guess for the sequence of events:

  1. Beckhoff action somehow caused one of the PSL channels (H1:PSL-PERISCOPE_A_DC_ERROR_FLAG) to momentarily disappear.
  2. IMC guardian, which is monitoring the above channel, goes into ERROR when said channel disappears
  3. Around this time, the IMC looses lock, presumably for the same reason the PSL channels disappeared.  Since the IMC guardian is in ERROR and no longer monitoring the IMC situation, it doesn't shut off the feedback to MC2.
  4. Large control signals into MC2 cause it to trip.  A typical watchdog cascade causes everthing from here to Walla Walla to trip.

It's possible guardian could be made slightly more robust against loss of some of it's channels, but that only helps up to a point.  Eventually guardian has to drop into some error condition if it can't talk to whatever it's trying to control.  It could try to move everything to some sort of safe state, but that only works if it can talk to the front-ends to actually change their state.

daniel.sigg@LIGO.ORG - 09:30, Saturday 29 March 2014 (11084)

A Beckhoff restart also causes the IMC servo board to be reset, as well as all whitening for photodiodes, wavefront sensors and QPDs. I assume that the resulting transient caused the MC to trip. It would be interesting to know, if this is due the length or alignment system. Is it the initial transient or a run-away integrator? In either case this should not result in a trip. A better action would be to simply turn off the ISC inputs.

arnaud.pele@LIGO.ORG - 11:45, Monday 31 March 2014 (11094)

After taking a look at the time of WD trips, it seems like HAM3 ISI trips before MC2, see green plot vs red plot (the X axis is the number of seconds after gps=1080083200)

Images attached to this comment
H1 SEI (INS)
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:54, Friday 28 March 2014 (11071)
WHAM4 SEI--HEPI Status--HEPI is Unlocked

Please mind the signs here at HAM4, there is an Optic suspended here.  Commissioning to commence shortly.

H1 General
jeffrey.bartlett@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:35, Friday 28 March 2014 (11069)
Ops Summary
Day Shift Summary
LVEA Laser Safe

Apollo - Bolting dome on BSC10, working on view ports at End-Y
Mitch – Check ACB at End-Y
Hugh – Working on HAM5 HEPI
Richard – Y-Arm TCS cabling

08:35 Mitch – Going to End-Y
08:53 Dave – LVEA working on TCS cabling
09:00 Justin – Moving laser barriers around the HAM4 TCS table area
09:18 Andres – Working on dog clamp shelves next to HAM2
09:20 Hugh & Jim – Working on HAM5 HEPI 
09:29 Betsy & Margo – Going to End-Y for BSC10 closeout
11:26 Filiberto – Going to Mid-Y to pick up TCS panels
13:00 Justin – Transition LVEA to laser hazard
13:20 Dave & Thomas – Turning on TCS chillers
14:00 Filiberto – Going to End-Y to check ACB feed through
14:05 Andres – Working on dog clamps shelves next to HAM2
15:30 Jax – Briefly transitioning End-Y to laser hazard to make a PZT check
15:36 Michael – Going to End-Y to check chamber close status 


H1 General
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:22, Friday 28 March 2014 (11068)
EY picomotors disabled

At Richard's request I disabled the End Y picomotors, so that they will not be used durring the pumpdown.

H1 ISC
jaclyn.sanders@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:15, Friday 28 March 2014 (11066)
ISCTEY handoff
I’ve been more or less solely responsible for commissioning ISCTEY at the end station, and the scope of the project has proven to be slightly larger than the amount of time I have left this trip. This is a summary of what’s left to do to finish commissioning the table. I’ve updated the Blue Team Punchlist to put these onto an “Active Tasks” sheet. 
 
PLL beatnote finding
 
The power and polarization of the fiber light has been drifting. As of yesterday, less than 40uW of power was making it to the table. Last week when Alexa and I first measured, we were getting more like 70uW. The polarization drifts over time, as expected and adjustable by the polarization controller. At the moment, the polarization monitor PD is aligned, but after aligning the PLL path, check to make sure this is still the case; it wasn’t aligned the other day, leading me to assume that the polarization was good when there was actually ~80% of the fiber power missing the polarization PD entirely.
 
For reference, the BBPD on the table has never been exposed to the shorted power cable, so any problems with it are not related to having been powered incorrectly. Also, remember to adjust the nominal power on the TMS green QPDs after optimizing the beatnote.
 
Analog video feedthrough
 
The analog video power cable is not connected because the feedthrough was filed out at some point, so the cable can’t be attached with screws. The two solutions proposed are epoxying the cable to the feedthrough or making a proper part. Either way, you will need to remove the feedthrough, fish the cable out of the table, install the cable, then replace the feedthrough. I have passed custody of this project on to Dick.
 
Wavefront sensing
 
The WFS paths are installed and nominally aligned, and the picomotor mirrors have been tested. The legacy WFS interface is in place at the EY field rack, but it is not cabled. Cables will need to be installed and the electronics will need to undergo the usual testing. The WFS on the table had good RF response in the EE shop but still need to be tested on-table. The return beam shape and quality also needs to be measured on these WFS paths.
 
Faraday mount
 
From the first beam measurement, it appears that the 532 path has some clipping. A new mount for the second Faraday isolator has been left on the bottom left corner of the table. This mount needs to be swapped in, and the beam needs to be realigned to the TMS using the irises on the table. Please check the iris position first, I placed them fairly well but I haven’t checked their positioning recently. The return path will also need to be realigned to the LSC RFPD and the wavefront sensors. 
 
HWS pickoff
 
The Hartmann sensor path will need a pickoff from the return beam. I received the beam sampler from Aidan today, but the wrong mounts were sent from Caltech. Once we receive open mounts, this optic needs to be installed between the second pico mirror and the first iris, and the beam aligned to the irises to return to the TMS. Thomas has custody of the beam samplers and the less-than-optimal mounts.

H1 AOS
filiberto.clara@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:10, Friday 28 March 2014 (11065)
ETMY Arm Cavity Baffle
Tested the forward voltage for the ACB diodes. 
BSC10 Flange F1-3C1 (air side).

Pin 1&2
PD forward voltage: 0.431V


Pin 4&5
PD forward voltage: 0.423V


Pin 7&8
PD forward voltage: 0.431V


Pin 10&11
PD forward voltage: 0.423V

All results within spec.
H1 SUS
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:31, Friday 28 March 2014 - last comment - 13:08, Monday 31 March 2014(11064)
EY closeout

Margot and I performed all of BSC10 closeout tasks listed in my previous alog regarding this closeout.  We pulled the FC from the ETMy optic a little after 11am, and the door was going on at ~1:30.  It took "so long" (ha) because we ended up having to spend some extra time calling in the troops about one of the ISC viewports having what appeared to be a scratch on it's inside surface.  More details to come as needed.

Comments related to this report
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - 18:44, Friday 28 March 2014 (11081)

Here are some further pictures of the ACB swing back and the FirstContact spray cone attachment to the HR side of the ETMy QUAD structure from yesterday.  Yes, the cone protrudes into the baffle.  Yes, Margot still was able to fit her head and an arm with the spray bottle in the cone.

The last picture shows the placement of the horizontal wafer and verticle 1" witness optic in the center of the chamber, placed today just before the door went on the chamber.

Images attached to this comment
margot.phelps@LIGO.ORG - 13:08, Monday 31 March 2014 (11097)
Notes and dcc numbers for Contamination Control Samples (ones that came out and ones that went in) to WBSC10 before doors went on:
1. Vertical 1’’ optics on QUAD: T1400246 (SN1195) out and T1400247 (SN 262) in. 
2. Vertical 1’’ optic under quad: T1400248 (SN261) placed at end of closeout.
3. Vertical wafer on quad: T1400249 attached to quad under HR of ETM.
4. Horizontal wafer on floor under quad:T1400250 placed at end of closeout.
5. Horizontal 1’’ optic: T1400251 was left on beam tube floor between BSC10 and BSC6. Looking up SN/history. Didn’t take it out, because we had no clean optic containers handy.
6. 24’’ PET swipe sample taken in tube near purge today close to end of closeout. Labeled, and taken to PET microscope area. 
H1 SEI (INS)
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:22, Friday 28 March 2014 - last comment - 14:00, Friday 28 March 2014(11061)
WHAM5 SEI Activities/Status--HEPI Floating & Unlocked

Jim locked the HAM5 ISI and then we floated the platform on HEPI.  A couple of Spring adjustments and we are level on the Optical Table to +-0.1mm.  Not sure about the elevation yet but it is likely close to Spec.  This will be good enough for continuing the ISI commissioning which we may get started before days end.

Please mind the signs--There are no optics here but HEPI is unlocked & floating; also please mind the Dial Indicators--Thanks--H

Comments related to this report
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - 14:00, Friday 28 March 2014 (11063)

Elevation of Optical Table is currently ~1mm low.  Target elevation is -325mmGz(D0901131-v1); the table is now at -326.2mm. Easy to correct during Initial Alignment.

H1 SEI
jeffrey.bartlett@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:30, Friday 28 March 2014 (11060)
ITMY HEPI Trip
ITMY HEPI tripped. Reset.  
Images attached to this report
H1 SEI
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:10, Friday 28 March 2014 - last comment - 14:28, Monday 07 April 2014(11059)
HAM2 HEPI L4C Trip

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
sebastien.biscans@LIGO.ORG - 14:28, Monday 07 April 2014 (11201)

For further record, it's actually HEPI-HAM3

H1 SEI
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:00, Friday 28 March 2014 (11058)
ETMX WD trip, request for operators

I've created a new folder on the desktop for WD trip plots, if operators could help us to plot and post these each time there is a trip it would be greatly appreciated.

You can create the plot by opening the WD screen, before untripping idenify the type of trip by looking for a red box in the First Trig column.  Use the blue buttons labaled Plot ACT trip to make the plots (it will pop up after a while).  Use the magnifying glass in the plot window to zoom the plot to the relevant time scale, then take a screen shot.  You can store this in the WDTrip folder on the desktop, and then post it in the alog. 

Images attached to this report
H1 SEI
fabrice.matichard@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:59, Friday 28 March 2014 (11057)
BSC-ISI Turn On Tests for the guardian

Jamie, Fabrice,

I am posting for the records and for discussion the WD trips we observe while tuning the turn on procedure for the guardian.

Non-image files attached to this report
H1 CDS (DAQ)
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:40, Friday 28 March 2014 (11054)
CDS model and DAQ restart report, Thursday 27th March 2014

no restarts reported.

H1 SEI
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:47, Thursday 27 March 2014 - last comment - 10:49, Friday 28 March 2014(11039)
New Seismic untrip instructions

Here is an update on the instruction for untripping seismic, with some new tips from Fabrice, especially for ETMX. 

Untrip HEPI WD, use Commands2 window to isolate level 1 on all chambers except BS which is level2

Untrip ISI WD (you may need to raise T240 Threshold)

reset CPS offsets,

Check that everything is in high gain: (this is also good to check if you are already isolated but have a lot of motion)

If you have been struggling with switching the blend filters, you may want to zero the T240s.  You can do this in the three T240 screens by tuning on the AutoZ filter module in the X filter module, then turning it off.  

Use commands, isolate level 3 for most chambers. For ETMX start with Commands, Isolate Stage 1 Level 2.  Once this script is finished, isolate stage 2 level 3.  

Switch Blends:

good luck...

Comments related to this report
fabrice.matichard@LIGO.ORG - 19:01, Thursday 27 March 2014 (11048)

We just tried again. The following sequence seems robust for ETMX:

 

a) Isolate Stage 1 Level 2

b) Isolate Stage 2 Level 3

c) Swith Stage 2 to TCrappy (Using Switch All)

d) Swith Stage 1 to TCrappy (Using Switch All)

 

We are working on the Guardian to simplify all of this. It will handle all the parameters and sequences specific to each chamber (controls level, blend filters, alignement dofs to be restored...)

hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - 07:59, Friday 28 March 2014 (11052)

If you have been struggling with switching the blend filters, you may want to zero the T240s.  You can do this in the three T240 screens by tuning on the AutoZ filter module in the X filter module, then turning it off.

It is my understanding that you should NOT zero the T240, certainly not just to try it.  In a new installatioin or the T240 is suspected of being out of level, then one should look at the U V W signals and AutoZ if they are not close to zero once the machine has stabilized. Before I was told this, it was my experience that pressing the AutoZ did NOT speed up the Trillium settleing process.  Rich Mittleman--please weigh in here.

brian.lantz@LIGO.ORG - 09:37, Friday 28 March 2014 (11055)
I agree with Hugh that re-zeroing the T240 should not be done while the T240 is in the midst of settling from a large dynamic shift. The re-zeroing is used to reset the mass-center of the instrument. This can shift with temperature or DC level changes. One should be sure the instrument has fully stabilized, otherwise you run the risk of 'recentering' to some off-center location.
the Manufacture's (Nanometrics) instuctions can be found in section 2.4.2 of the T240 OBS manual (1). 
https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-T0900323  (2)
-Brian


(1) OBS - Ocean Bottom Seismometer. we use this because it is smaller, and we provide our own pressure vessel.
(2) yes, we have received permission to put a copy in the DCC.

sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 10:49, Friday 28 March 2014 (11056)

Thank you for clarifying...

Fabrice asks that we also add a step at the begining of the procedure where we plot the WD trip, zoom in and post it in the alog.  Hopefully this we result in seismic people analyzing them and figuring out why we have so many trips. 

This is important because our current rate of trips (and the time it takes to recover from them) will be a serious impediment to commsioning once we need to use 7 chambers all at the same time. 

H1 AOS
thomas.vo@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:37, Thursday 27 March 2014 - last comment - 08:24, Friday 28 March 2014(11047)
TCS CO2-X Laser Install
Aidan, Dave H, Thomas

More cabling and plumbing.  The leaky laser from ALOG 11019 was replaced with a new one and a matching RF driver. We're in a position to be able to turn on the laser mid-morning tomorrow.
Comments related to this report
aidan.brooks@LIGO.ORG - 08:24, Friday 28 March 2014 (11053)

Images attached to this comment
H1 SUS
travis.sadecki@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:32, Thursday 27 March 2014 - last comment - 09:19, Friday 04 April 2014(11044)
ITMx Monolithic Welding

The new ITMx monolithic welding has been successfully completed and was left suspended overnight last night.  The majority of the modal measurements have also been completed today, with the exception of the violin modes, which are proving to be trickier to measure than in previous suspensions.  We will continue with these measurements tomorrow with some different equipment.  Stay tuned for subsequent posts with IAS and modal measurement numbers.

Comments related to this report
angus.bell@LIGO.ORG - 12:28, Friday 28 March 2014 (11062)
Modal frequencies of the test mass (ITMX) with the PUM nominally locked are:

ITMX				
          value	resolution		
Pendulum   0.649	0.002						
Pitch	   1.1153	0.002		
Yaw	   1.0928	0.002		
Bounce	   6.74 	0.016		
Roll	   9.195	0.016		

Violin modes				fibre serial number
BR	   499.9	0.06		S1400155
BL	   501.2	0.06		S1400156
FR	   500.8	0.06		S1400138
FL	   502.2	0.06		S1400153

[just as a note to self as much as anything - remember to use the Uniform window on the spectrum analyser for the violin modes when using the chirped sweep output]
Non-image files attached to this comment
jason.oberling@LIGO.ORG - 09:19, Friday 04 April 2014 (11171)

Forgot to post this last week.  Final alignment numbers from the ITMx welding (all directions/rotations reported from the view of the IAS equipment, i.e. looking at the HR face of the ITMx):

  • Pitch
    • PUM: 10 µrad down
    • ITMx: 2.12 mrad down
    • Differential: 2.11 mrad down
      • The pitch of the ITMx in chamber is 619 µrad down, so we align the ITMx for the welding at this pitch.  Since we are targeting a differential pitch of 619 µrad down, we only missed our target by 1.49 mrad, which puts us within the 2.0 mrad differential pitch spec
    • Differential Spec: 2.0 mrad
  • Roll
    • PUM: ±0.05 mm CW
    • ITMx: ±0.25 mm CW
    • Differential: ±0.2 mm CW
  • Center of Mass Separation
    • Left: 601.3 mm
    • Right: 601.7 mm
    • Target (for both sides): 602.0 mm
Displaying reports 72261-72280 of 83002.Go to page Start 3610 3611 3612 3613 3614 3615 3616 3617 3618 End