Displaying reports 72281-72300 of 82999.Go to page Start 3611 3612 3613 3614 3615 3616 3617 3618 3619 End
Reports until 19:32, Thursday 27 March 2014
H1 SUS
arnaud.pele@LIGO.ORG - posted 19:32, Thursday 27 March 2014 (11030)
TMSY last TF results before closeout

Last night, undamped transfer functions of H1 TMSY were ran (Phase 3a) with the ISI damped. 3 different drive amplitudes were tried to see if cables are not adding non linear effects.

In orange excitation amplitude is 10000, in black drive is 150000, in pink drive is 20000. TF is consistent throughout the drives.

Differences in frequency of resonnances can be seen in the L V R P degrees of freedom:

First roll mode at 0.68Hz splits in three modes 0.68Hz 0.72Hz and 0.79Hz
First Pitch mode at 0.74Hz splits in two modes at 0.72Hz and 0.79Hz
First Vertical mode at 0.69Hz splits in three modes at 0.67Hz 0.72Hz and 0.79Hz
Second Long mode at 0.74Hz (pitch coupling = first pitch mode) splits in two modes at 0.72Hz and 0.79Hz

All differences can certainly be explained by the change of cable routing when moving cartridge from BSC6 to BSC10. (For details on how the current routing looks like see pictures on alog 11021). Since the actuation is working properly, and the suspension still provides passive isolation above the resonnances, it seemed acceptable to move on with installation.

Non-image files attached to this report
H1 SUS
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - posted 19:27, Thursday 27 March 2014 - last comment - 18:38, Friday 28 March 2014(11049)
ETMy First Contact Applied

This morning, SEI, TMS, and SUS gave a cursory "approval" of their systems in order to proceed with chamber close-out tasks.  So, after lunch, Margot and I applied First Contact to the ETMy-HR surface which will be pulled just before closing the door tomorrow.  The order of events this afternoon (and late morning in order to catch the alog up):

Jim locked the ISI and put final touches on chamber feedthru cable routing.

Apollo+Joe+Gerardo had a viewport party at the BSC10/6 area.

Margot and I locked the lowest masses of the ETMy QUAD.  Then we,

Secured the ACB locking bracket and used the wedge to swing it back and prop it into place.  See notes on this in attached alog.

Attached the FC QUAD cone to the structure and sprayed FC (standard 3 coats) on the HR surface.

Removed the cone from the suspension.  Finished FC layer reinforcement.

Removed the wedge from the ACB and restored it's nominal hanging position. Removed the ACB locking bracket screws.

Started stowing all left over bags of "junk" left outside of the chamber door on various table surfaces by SUS and every other team that visited this last month.  If you're missing something (and you noticed), I took ownership of it.

Jim arrived and unlocked the ISI.  The ETMy QUAD will remain locked during dome replacement.

Apollo started gearing up to remove walking plates from upstairs and crane the dome on the chamber.

 

Tomorrow's to-do list which Margot and I will do until the last step:

Inspect insides of viewports.

Adjust ACB to check magnet gap which may or may not have shifted slightly due to the swing back from today.

Clean the chamber, vacuum, etc.

Take final PCL swipes.

Blow various other optic surfaces.  Or not.

Swap in final 1" witness optic on QUAD structure.

Check/Remove all tools.

Remove ETMy-HR with N2 blow.

Set and lock all 64 QUAD EQ stops and nuts, accounting for buoyancy.

Set QUAD BOSEMs to account for buoyancy.

Quick QUAD health check with DTT TFs.

Lay final witness plates.

Exit chamber.

Finish stowing everything around door and move it out of the way.

Put door on.

Comments related to this report
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - 20:10, Thursday 27 March 2014 (11050)

So, when we went to swing back the ACB and stuff the wedge into place, the wedge could not be inserted in the gap all of the way due to interference with the round balance weight attached on top of the baffle.  We pushed the wedge in ~2/3 of the way which gave us ~2/3 more working area than we had with out swinging it back at all.  Good enough.  (Removing the round weight would have cause the balance of the ACB to be out of alignment so that wasn't an option.)  Also, even though the locking bracket was engaded which provided some support to the down tube of the ACB, the ACB was still a bit "rickety" during this maneuver.

betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - 18:38, Friday 28 March 2014 (11079)

The first picture below is of the ACB wedge not quite installed as far in as it could.  This meant that the screw holes to secure the wedge in place could not be engaged.  ACB engineers must have anticipated this so they provided us with a "safety" chain which one could tie up "somewhere" such that the wedge doesn't come flying out at you if you bump the baffle while it's up.  The chain was of limited length, so they best Margot and I could do was wind it around the post loosely a few times.  Note, the wedge seemed wedged in well enough that it didn't budge when we did happen to bump the baffle a bit here and there with the cone work.

 

Also note, the ACB did not hang the same way after we restored it.  Mitchell had to make some minor tweeks to the balance today in order to recover the correct gap setting for the magnets (specifically 0.09 inches! - Really?  Not 0.08" or 0.1", but 0.09", huh!?  Seems a bit tight given the grossness of both the swing back application and the shear size of the baffle... but what do I in SUS know.)  In the end, as usual the ACB comes with in a few mm of the QUAD structure at the head of one of it's screws (see 2nd picture with red circle around it).

Images attached to this comment
H1 SEI
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:47, Thursday 27 March 2014 - last comment - 10:49, Friday 28 March 2014(11039)
New Seismic untrip instructions

Here is an update on the instruction for untripping seismic, with some new tips from Fabrice, especially for ETMX. 

Untrip HEPI WD, use Commands2 window to isolate level 1 on all chambers except BS which is level2

Untrip ISI WD (you may need to raise T240 Threshold)

reset CPS offsets,

Check that everything is in high gain: (this is also good to check if you are already isolated but have a lot of motion)

If you have been struggling with switching the blend filters, you may want to zero the T240s.  You can do this in the three T240 screens by tuning on the AutoZ filter module in the X filter module, then turning it off.  

Use commands, isolate level 3 for most chambers. For ETMX start with Commands, Isolate Stage 1 Level 2.  Once this script is finished, isolate stage 2 level 3.  

Switch Blends:

good luck...

Comments related to this report
fabrice.matichard@LIGO.ORG - 19:01, Thursday 27 March 2014 (11048)

We just tried again. The following sequence seems robust for ETMX:

 

a) Isolate Stage 1 Level 2

b) Isolate Stage 2 Level 3

c) Swith Stage 2 to TCrappy (Using Switch All)

d) Swith Stage 1 to TCrappy (Using Switch All)

 

We are working on the Guardian to simplify all of this. It will handle all the parameters and sequences specific to each chamber (controls level, blend filters, alignement dofs to be restored...)

hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - 07:59, Friday 28 March 2014 (11052)

If you have been struggling with switching the blend filters, you may want to zero the T240s.  You can do this in the three T240 screens by tuning on the AutoZ filter module in the X filter module, then turning it off.

It is my understanding that you should NOT zero the T240, certainly not just to try it.  In a new installatioin or the T240 is suspected of being out of level, then one should look at the U V W signals and AutoZ if they are not close to zero once the machine has stabilized. Before I was told this, it was my experience that pressing the AutoZ did NOT speed up the Trillium settleing process.  Rich Mittleman--please weigh in here.

brian.lantz@LIGO.ORG - 09:37, Friday 28 March 2014 (11055)
I agree with Hugh that re-zeroing the T240 should not be done while the T240 is in the midst of settling from a large dynamic shift. The re-zeroing is used to reset the mass-center of the instrument. This can shift with temperature or DC level changes. One should be sure the instrument has fully stabilized, otherwise you run the risk of 'recentering' to some off-center location.
the Manufacture's (Nanometrics) instuctions can be found in section 2.4.2 of the T240 OBS manual (1). 
https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-T0900323  (2)
-Brian


(1) OBS - Ocean Bottom Seismometer. we use this because it is smaller, and we provide our own pressure vessel.
(2) yes, we have received permission to put a copy in the DCC.

sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 10:49, Friday 28 March 2014 (11056)

Thank you for clarifying...

Fabrice asks that we also add a step at the begining of the procedure where we plot the WD trip, zoom in and post it in the alog.  Hopefully this we result in seismic people analyzing them and figuring out why we have so many trips. 

This is important because our current rate of trips (and the time it takes to recover from them) will be a serious impediment to commsioning once we need to use 7 chambers all at the same time. 

H1 SEI (DetChar, INS, ISC, SUS, SYS)
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:27, Thursday 27 March 2014 (11046)
Windowing Matters for signals with large dynamic range.
Shocking, I know.

While exploring data from last night (see LHO aLOG 11026), I saw what looked to be artificially clean straight lines through the performance of the ISIs. In order to confirm, I switched the windowing function in DTT from the default Hann(ing) to "BMH" (which I think is the Blackman-Harris Window), and indeed the reported ASD at those frequencies where the spectra looked artificial changed. Sadly, with this particularly huge dynamic range of a signal, the spectral leakage artifacts hide the real signal right at the frequencies where tilt bothers us (~0.5 to 10 [Hz]). I also tried the Flat Top window, and that seems to be the best for X DOF which has high dynamic range, but in RY, which doesn't, it "over" estimates the ASD at 0.05 [Hz]. Unclear whether this is a good compromise given that depending on the hour, we're interested in one band or the other affecting the performance.

So, I guess I'll have to use asd2.m found here because "[when not computationally limited,] the spectral [leakage] of a single, long-time window is much smaller than the spectral [leakage] of many short, overlapping windows (like you get with pwelch)". Which really means we should just get the live noise budget up and running.

#yakshaving
Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
H1 AOS
thomas.vo@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:37, Thursday 27 March 2014 - last comment - 08:24, Friday 28 March 2014(11047)
TCS CO2-X Laser Install
Aidan, Dave H, Thomas

More cabling and plumbing.  The leaky laser from ALOG 11019 was replaced with a new one and a matching RF driver. We're in a position to be able to turn on the laser mid-morning tomorrow.
Comments related to this report
aidan.brooks@LIGO.ORG - 08:24, Friday 28 March 2014 (11053)

Images attached to this comment
LHO General
bubba.gateley@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:51, Thursday 27 March 2014 (11045)
Apollo crew
All view ports on the spool between BSC 6 & 10 were removed and replaced with blanks and torqued. The dome went on BSC 10 and 90% of the bolts were inserted with 4 of them snugged with the remainder to be tightend tomorrow morning.
H1 SUS
travis.sadecki@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:32, Thursday 27 March 2014 - last comment - 09:19, Friday 04 April 2014(11044)
ITMx Monolithic Welding

The new ITMx monolithic welding has been successfully completed and was left suspended overnight last night.  The majority of the modal measurements have also been completed today, with the exception of the violin modes, which are proving to be trickier to measure than in previous suspensions.  We will continue with these measurements tomorrow with some different equipment.  Stay tuned for subsequent posts with IAS and modal measurement numbers.

Comments related to this report
angus.bell@LIGO.ORG - 12:28, Friday 28 March 2014 (11062)
Modal frequencies of the test mass (ITMX) with the PUM nominally locked are:

ITMX				
          value	resolution		
Pendulum   0.649	0.002						
Pitch	   1.1153	0.002		
Yaw	   1.0928	0.002		
Bounce	   6.74 	0.016		
Roll	   9.195	0.016		

Violin modes				fibre serial number
BR	   499.9	0.06		S1400155
BL	   501.2	0.06		S1400156
FR	   500.8	0.06		S1400138
FL	   502.2	0.06		S1400153

[just as a note to self as much as anything - remember to use the Uniform window on the spectrum analyser for the violin modes when using the chirped sweep output]
Non-image files attached to this comment
jason.oberling@LIGO.ORG - 09:19, Friday 04 April 2014 (11171)

Forgot to post this last week.  Final alignment numbers from the ITMx welding (all directions/rotations reported from the view of the IAS equipment, i.e. looking at the HR face of the ITMx):

  • Pitch
    • PUM: 10 µrad down
    • ITMx: 2.12 mrad down
    • Differential: 2.11 mrad down
      • The pitch of the ITMx in chamber is 619 µrad down, so we align the ITMx for the welding at this pitch.  Since we are targeting a differential pitch of 619 µrad down, we only missed our target by 1.49 mrad, which puts us within the 2.0 mrad differential pitch spec
    • Differential Spec: 2.0 mrad
  • Roll
    • PUM: ±0.05 mm CW
    • ITMx: ±0.25 mm CW
    • Differential: ±0.2 mm CW
  • Center of Mass Separation
    • Left: 601.3 mm
    • Right: 601.7 mm
    • Target (for both sides): 602.0 mm
LHO General
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:23, Thursday 27 March 2014 (11028)
Ops Summary
08:57 Aidan and Dave H. working on TCSX table enclosure
09:14 Jeff and Andres working on SR3
09:34 Corey to end X TMS lab to bag and inventory parts
09:53 Jeff done working on SR3, Andres finishing up
10:18 Betsy going to work in LVEA test stand
10:20 Jim done taking measurements on end Y ISI, to end Y to work on cable routing
10:24 Jax transitioning end Y to laser safe
10:29 Hugh to HAM4 to install vertical L4Cs
10:30 Kyle to crane RGA over YBM (WP 4529)
10:41 end Y is laser safe
11:07 Kyle done craning
11:59 Andres, Arnaud starting transfer function measurement on SR3
12:00 Guardian code is running on ITMY ISI
12:36 Betsy and Margo leaving to go into BSC 10
12:47 Karen going to end Y to clean in VEA
12:59 Ski to end Y (not in VEA)
13:04 Tour in CR
13:45 Ski back from end Y
13:49 Dave H., Aidan and Thomas starting work again on TCSX
15:05 Karen back from end Y
15:25 Dick and Jax going to end Y to install electronics, too much other work going on, left electronics there
15:46 Apollo installing dome at end Y

High dust count alarms at end Y most of the afternoon, parties involved informed
H1 CDS
cyrus.reed@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:20, Thursday 27 March 2014 (11043)
Rsync of h1boot /opt

I have started an rsync of the /opt filesystem on h1boot, to the new backup boot server starting at 16:14PDT.  The filesystem on h1boot may be a little slow while the transfer runs, on a timescale probably measured in hours as it is about 300GB of data.

H2 SEI (SEI)
mitchell.robinson@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:11, Thursday 27 March 2014 (11042)
Staging building, 3IFO (unit 3) progress
Mitchell with Apollo help until lunch,
The newly assembled optical table was moved and placed on stage 0. After lunch I shopped for the parts at the interferometer emporium, moved the Stage 1 base plate onto the granite table and attached the plate flipping gear. 
H1 PSL
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:07, Thursday 27 March 2014 (11041)
H1 PSL check
Laser is on
Output power is 28.1 W (should be 30 W)
Watchdog is active
No warnings in PSL SYSSTAT.adl other than "VB program online" 

PMC
Locked for 4 days 3 hours (should be days/weeks)
Reflected power is 12.7% of transmitted power (should be 10% or less)

FSS
Reference cavity is not locked
Trans PD threshold is .4 V (should be at least .9 V)

ISS
Diffracted power is around 7.8% (should be around 10%)
Last saturation event was 11 minutes ago (should be days/weeks)
H1 SUS (DetChar, SEI)
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:09, Thursday 27 March 2014 - last comment - 15:42, Thursday 27 March 2014(11036)
Fixed ITMX and ETMX CART2EUL Matrices
J. Kissel

While using the channels that project the ISI ST2 GS13s in the Cartesian basis to the Test Mass QUAD suspension point in the Euler basis for the X-arm QUADs, i.e. H1:SUS-?TMX_M0_ISIWIT_?_DQ, I noticed that the projection matrices that create these channels were a copy-and-paste from the Y-arm, and therefore wrong by 90 [deg]. I've corrected the matrices at around 2014-03-27 21:55 UTC, saved, and committed a new safe.snap such that they stick.

Details for the record:
-----------------------
These matrices are calculated using the script
/ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/Common/MatlabTools/make_ISI2SUS_projections.m
which takes in the locations of each SUS from the parameter file
/ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/Common/MatlabTools/SEI2SUScoordinates.m
based on the systems SolidWorks drawings for that suspension. 

They are pre-calculated and stored in the mat file
/opt/rtcds/userapps/release/isc/common/projections/ISI2SUS_projection_file.mat
which I loaded into a matlab and ran the function 
/ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/Common/MatlabTools/fill_matrix_values.m
to automatically fill in the epics values.

The theory behind these projections can be found in T1100617

#yakshaving
Comments related to this report
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 15:12, Thursday 27 March 2014 (11037)DetChar, ISC, SEI
I checked and confirmed that the TMSX CART2EUL matrix is also wrong, but I didn't fix it because the parameter file doesn't have the coordinates for the TMS pulled from the systems drawings yet, and I'm already distracted enough. We'll get to it later.
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 15:42, Thursday 27 March 2014 (11040)
And now the plots makes sense, and we can do science again.

Look at the tilt (ISI RY) contribution to Longitudinal Motion at the suspension point! This is now, at no particular time. Now on to look a Sheila's data from yesterday (see LHO aLOG 11026).
Non-image files attached to this comment
H1 SEI (INS, TCS)
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:10, Thursday 27 March 2014 (11034)
WHAM4 SEI HEPI Vertical L4Cs Complete

Installed these this morning, leveled, torqued, wired, protected, labeled.  No issues except the TCS rack 3" from Pier1.  That rack will need to move.

H1 ISC
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:18, Thursday 27 March 2014 (11033)
Red arm lock last night

Richard, Sheila

Richard noticed that the arm was locked pretty stably on IR when he came in this morning, and made a trend over night (first screen shot).  There was a half hour lock, second screen shot.

Images attached to this report
H1 ISC
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:20, Thursday 27 March 2014 - last comment - 10:58, Thursday 27 March 2014(11025)
Red arm losses

Valera called and asked for a measurement of the arm losses.  I used REFL_AIR, meaured 0 counts when the IMC was unlocked, 1.539 when the arm was locked with ALS off resonance, and 1.471 when the arm was locked on resonance.  The IR trans power was only 70% of the nominal, so the arm was not well aligned and this only gives us an upper limit on the losses, which is 159ppm, assuming the ITM transmission is 1.4%. 

A more accurate measurement shoud probably be done. 

Comments related to this report
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 10:58, Thursday 27 March 2014 (11032)

Correction: This is really a lower limit, anyway not a very good one.

Logbook Admin Bug
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:15, Wednesday 26 March 2014 - last comment - 09:43, Thursday 27 March 2014(11008)
Problem Uploading Photos

Not sure what the deal is with my photos, but for some reason alog chooses to not let some of my photos upload to an entry.  Have used original names of images, and changed names of files.  Have tried from home and from work to no avail.  Will keep trying.  Attached is the error message I get afer I try uploading the file I select.

Entries made via MacBook Pro & with Firefox.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jonathan.hanks@LIGO.ORG - 09:43, Thursday 27 March 2014 (11031)
The issue was fixed by adjusting a parameter on the server.
H1 AOS (AOS)
david.ottaway@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:24, Tuesday 25 March 2014 - last comment - 15:18, Thursday 27 March 2014(10996)
H1 Output Faraday Isolator Performance
Dave O, Gerado,

The performance of the Output Faraday Isolator was tweaked and a transmission of 96.5 +/- 0.5% was recorded and an isolation of 9e-5 was measured. See attached report for more details.
Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
david.ottaway@LIGO.ORG - 15:18, Thursday 27 March 2014 (11038)
We also used the Shack Hartmann Sensor to put and limit on the spherical power introduced by the Output Faraday Isolator (See attached document) 
Non-image files attached to this comment
Displaying reports 72281-72300 of 82999.Go to page Start 3611 3612 3613 3614 3615 3616 3617 3618 3619 End