I'm moving the old conlog machine to a new rack, so it (and by extension the historical data) will be unavailable for 15-20 min.  The new production conlog system will be unaffected.

Jeff gave links in his alog for previous occurances of this error. This table summarizes the date for the front ends which exhibited this error over the past year:

9 events in one year. h1sush2a and h1seih23 show this error more than once (3 times and 4 times respectively)

I have compiled all models using RCG2.8.5 in preparation for Thursday's upgrade. The procedure was:

• Save the H1.ipc file
• create a new H1.ipc file by running "make -i World" (skip errors, force IPC writers into ipc file)
• run "make World", failed at h1susauxb123 due to SPSZ part. Jeff and Arnaud instructed me to remove this part from the model, which I did and committd to svn
• run "make World" a second time, failed at h1susquadtst. This is an out of date top level model not synced with QUAD_MASTER. Took this out of rtsystab for now
• run "make World" a third time, all compiled.
• Saved the "2.8.5" version of H1.ipc and restored this file to this morning's version.

If anyone needs to compiled models today or tomorrow, please email me as I may  have to rebuild against the new IPC file tomorrow.

Running full measurement, but should be done tomorrow morning.

08:00 LVEA is LASER HAZARD
08:00 Visitor - Tim McDonald arrived
08:50 "low/major" alarm in HO:FMC-EX_CY_H2O_SUO-DEGF- John Worden notified
09:01 M Landry - shuttering LASER temporarily for viewport inspection by vacuum team Vac team will be allowed to remove glasses for this operation. . Un-shutter immediately after. Remain LASER hazard
09:15 J Batch - bringing framewriter 1 down to move files. Should only take a few minutes.
09:30 J. Bergman - re-opening PSL shutter
09:30 Kiwamu and Sheila to PSL to instal some PD an AOM to take IMC cavity pole measurements for prep to run at higher power. - out at 12:21 THey will go back in some time this evening.
09:32 Nathan to optics lab
09:34 Jordan and Paul to End-Y to swap out AI chassis for PEM - out 10:17.
09:44 D Barker - "Code Freeze" UNTIL NOON
09:48 Doug and Jason into LVEA to wander and look for pieces parts for OpLev -out at 10:30
09:55 Kyle and Gerardo going to postpone crawling around on chambers in LVEA until after lunch.
10:05 Travis out to HAM 3 to check on Mobility experiment
10:20 Betsy out to hunt LVEA for ISC HAM6 parts
10:39 Praxxair out (didn't see them arrive)
10:40 Betsy working in West Bay on Quad
10:42 Kyle out to End-Y VEA to turn something off. -out at 11:00
12:30 Karen to End-Y
12:13 Pablo called to report he was at End-Y to do characterization on ALS and VCO.
12:34 Filiberto to End-Y to change the bias filter box for the ESD...... to be continued by Corey

As part of the upgrade to RCG2.8.5 I am taking the opportunity to rebuild the H1.ipc file from scratch because it contains a lot of orphaned channels and jumps in channel numbering.

I wrote a script to parse the H1.ipc INI file, compressing each channel into a single line so we can do diff,awk,sed type operations on it (script is parseIpcIniFile)

Here are the orphaned channels which are being removed (Qty 40):

20 days of the end station pressure including the two injection events.

Because of maintenance, the default NDS server has been changed to h1nds0.  The raw minute data files for the last several months are being moved and would be unavailable on h1nds1.

• Oplevs:  start HAM triples today?  organizing/cleaning parts
• Discussion about the LVEA "major leaker" at HAM4 & how this can affect upcoming work.  Vent possibly Thurs, which means roughing Fri & possibly weekend.
• Discussion about HAM6 alignment and also cable clean-up & ISI balancing which will also need to be done afterward. 
• EX:  Tiltmeter Chamber sealed up & pumping (Krishna)
• EY:  discussion about ETMy discharge test
• Property Auditor from CIT on-site
• Maintenance:  rcg2.8.5 build models (so changes will be in effect until after power outage), MSR battery swap, liquid nitrogen at EY

The results from today's diagnostic breadboard scan.

The relative power noise measurement doesn't look too bad.  Better than the reference measurement at low frequencies below about 20 Hz but worse elsewhere but not by much.  The first loop power stabilisation servo performance is better than the reference signal at frequencies below about 40 Hz but worse for frequencies above about 1 kHz.

The frequency noise measurement is out of whack.  It is known that perhaps the gains on the servo are not adjusted to their correct values.  Currently the common gain is set to 27 dB and the fast gain to 17 dB.  This will have to be tuned up when time permits.

The beam pointing measurement looks good, or at least okay.

The mode scan looks almost identical to last week.  The percentage higher order mode content is fractionally lower this week but not significant I think.

model restarts logged for Mon 11/Aug/2014
2014_08_11 09:36 h1hpiitmy
2014_08_11 09:36 h1iopseib1
2014_08_11 09:36 h1isiitmy
2014_08_11 10:42 h1iopseih23
2014_08_11 10:42 h1isiham2
2014_08_11 10:42 h1isiham3
2014_08_11 10:44 h1hpiham2
2014_08_11 10:44 h1hpiham3
2014_08_11 13:58 h1iopsusb123
2014_08_11 13:58 h1susbs
2014_08_11 13:58 h1susitmx
2014_08_11 13:58 h1susitmy
2014_08_11 14:34 h1iopsusb123
2014_08_11 14:36 h1susbs
2014_08_11 14:38 h1susitmy
2014_08_11 14:39 h1susitmx

recovery restarts due to several problems with cpu freeze and non-driving DACs

[Alexa, Dan, Masayuki, Kiwamu, Keita, and Koji]
(updated 8:15AM, correction of the window deflection angle)

HAM6 alignment work is in progress. The beam reached to the OMC but not aligned to the OMC QPDs yet.

Here is more details of the work done on Aug 11.

= Guiding the beam to HAM6 =

The beam was guided to HAM6 by centering the beam on the SRM. By shaking the SRM alignment in pitch and yaw, we could confirm
how the spot was centered. In reality, we initially suffered from not noticing intentional misalignment of PR2. Once the PR2 alignment was
restored, it was not so difficult to find the spot around the SRM aluminum holder.

= Locating the beam axis at the center of the clear aperture =

Once the beam was found in HAM6, we again shook the SR2 to find the aperture free from clipping by the SRM or OFI.
The beam was settled at the center of the clear aperture.
Note: this does not necesarily mean that the beam is still at the center of the SRM.

The beam coming in the HAM6 chamber has in deed a different angle from the design layout (D1000342).
The beam entrace point is located almost as designed. At the edge of the table the beam height was 97.5mm (3.84"). This already suggests the
beam is downward. The beam is angled not only in vertical, but also in horizontal. At the position of the OM1 tip-tilt, the beam is 2" to South
(towards OMC) and 0.5" too low. This angle is, in deed, 32mrad and 8mrad, respectively. This couldn't only be caused by the spot location on SR2
as it requires tens of cm shift on SR2. Therefore we suspected any wedged optics around HAM5, which means the septem window and
wedged prisms in the OFI.

Keita called LLO and confirmed they had similar horizontal beam shift but observed no vertical shift. This may mean that the horizontal angle
is a systematic effect. We confirmed the wedged window is installed so that it wedges almost horizontally (see attached photo).
Keita calculated the wedge effect of the septem to be 6mrad. This is not enough to explain the angle we actually saw.
We also wondered how the wedged prisms are installed in the OFI.

We checked if the beam power does make sense or not. The detected power right after the spetem was 3.2mW. This is reasonable as it is
not so far from the expected value of 4mW. [1.9W (Pin) x 0.8 (IMC) x 0.03 (PRM) x 0.35 (SRM) x 1/4 (Michelson) = 4mW]

= OM1 Tip-tilt / OM1 transmission path (AS_AIR and AS_C QPD) =

For now, we decided to continue to align the other optics. Firstly, we moved the OM1 to South (towards OMC) by 2".

The transmission path of OM1 had to be moved by 2" as well. This actually causes the counter mass moved towards East door by 2".
Therefore the table balance has to be reviewed eventually. The other steering mirrors were also moved as well. The first two steering mirrors
after OM1 had to be largely angled in pitch to absorb 8mrad beam tilt at OM1. The beam was centered on the last steering and the beam is directed
to AS_C QPD. We used CDS to finely align the beam on the QPD. The beamsplitter before the last steering was aligned such that the beam exits
from the enter of the window emulator.

The beam diverter and its beam dump were aligned. The beam diverter is open when the mirror is at the west side (HAM5 side)
and is closed when the mirror is at the east side (East door side).

= OM1 Tip-tilt alignment =

OM1 was moved so that the beam hit the center of OM2. This requred OM1 facing upward to compensate the vertical angle of the incoming beam.
This was done by the counter balancing screw on OM1. The range was not enough only by moving the screw, the screw was inserted from the back
to give more weight at the back side of OM1.

= Fast shutter / beam dump =

The fast shutter could not be placed at the planned place as the body structure of the shutter blocks the incoming beam.
The shutter was placed west side (HAM5 side) of OM3 rather than the east side. The upwarding beam in this path caused the fast shutter reflection
going up. This caused the beam on the beam dump too high by 1". This needs to be fixed before closing the door.

= OM2 alignment =

OM2 was rotated in yaw in order to accommofate the spot on OM3. The natural misalignment of OM2 in pitch made the spot on OM3 almost at the center.

= OM3 alignment =

We rotated OM3 to hit the input mirror of the OMC cavity. The OMC REFL beam was found. We did not hit any of the OMC QPDs yet.

= Beam clearance =

In the end, the beam is enough away from the tip-tilt cages desppite the move of the incoming beam.
The distance between OM2 and the incoming beam is about 2". The one between OM3 and the incoming beam is about 2.5".
The distance between OM2 and the relfected beam from OM1 is about 0.5" while the beam size there looked less than a mm.

= Adding dog clamps =

The many of the optics on the table was fixed only with one screw or a dog clamp. We started to add more clamps to them. It's not complete yet.

Hopefully the people who actually did the work will fill in the details, but here's my brief summary of HAM6.

Horizontal 2" shift is also here at LHO, in the same direction.

Koji and his crews found that the beam was about 2" off horizontally at OM1 toward OMC. This is the same direction and the same amount as what LLO saw. Koji had to move OM1 by about 2" to the South.

They also confirmed that, horizontally, the beam position at the edge of the ISI table is about right, and the beam angle relative to the screw hole rows is much smaller than it should be (the beam is almost parallel to the screw hole rows). 

The beam is too low on OM1.

In addition to horizontal problem, the beam is also too low on OM1 when Koji set the beam at the middle point in the OFI by scanning SR2. 

(I thought Koji said that it was an inch too low on OM1, but it cannot be as OM1 is a 2" optic. Maybe 1cm?)

Koji pointed the two steering mirrors behind OM1 to make the AS beam height right. He also needs to point OM1 up and OM2 down to make the OMC path right.

There are some speculations about why (horizontally and vertically) but we need to check the numbers first. Anyway, this should not stop us from aligning the OMC path for now.

Jeff K, Krishna V.

After scrounging for the right connecting links between the vacuum chamber and the ion pump, we finally started pulling vacuum on the chamber in the afternoon, around 4 PM, with a pumping station (Turbo pump backed by a diaphragm pump). By the 7:30 PM, the pressure at the Turbo was down to about 6E-6 torr.

The balance was centered on the autocollimator and we are taking data overnight. One side of the foam box is open for the vacuum hose so there is a lot of low-frequency drift due to temperature noise. Plots to follow soon.

Tomorrow, we will repeat the 'transfer function' measurement to confirm the small distance between CoM and the suspension point/pivot.

Day's Activities

• 8:10:  Fire Dept on site
• 8:20  Krishna at EX for tiltmeter pumpdown work
• 8:35 Transitioning LVEA to Laser SAFE
• 8:45 ESD investigation (filiberto)
• 9:10 LVEA leak investigations
• 9:00 BS Oplev work begins (Doug/Jason)
• 9:33 SEIB1:  being brought back by Jim Batch (went down last night at 6pm)
• Pablo out at EY ALS VCO (doing what?
• 10am transitioning LVEA to laser HAZARD
• 10:44 Nathan working in Optics Lab (must check out with Operator!)
• 11:15 Shut off Fire Pumps (Richard)
• 11:30 Fire Dept off site
• Chris cleaning EX after lunch
• 11:37 GV1 being closed (Kyle)
• 12:34 Arnaud using new code at ETMX
• 12:58 Open GV1 & close GV2 (Kyle)
• 1:05 VCO Cabling at EX for Pablo (Richard)
• 1:17 Leak detector being rolled out to LVEA (Gerardo)
• 1:45 SUSB123 died--powercycle at 1:54 (this took down SEI WD, gave IPC errors, and all around havoc)
• 1:57 Hugh heading out to EY to investigate errant HEPI Pump Controller
• 2:12 Paul, Jordan, &  going to EX to calibrate sensors
• 2:37 3IFO quads being rolled into LVEA
• Heard rumors of light being observed at HAM6...

SR2 : top mass damping on / off
SRM : top middle bottom damping on / off
MC2 : top damping on

MC2 guardian was changed to "DAMPED"
SRM and SR2 are still "ALIGNED"

If mode cleaner/ SRC is needed tonight, feel free to kill the matlab sessions on opsws1.

Gains to decouple bottom mass (pitch and yaw) angular motion from top mass longitudinal drive at DC were implemented in L2P and L2Y components of the top mass drivealign matrix of MC2 using the dc magnitude of the top to bottom L2P (urad/Force cts) and P2P (urad/Torque cts) for length to pitch decoupling and L2Y, Y2Y for length to yaw decoupling. This should be tested.

(Borja)

We have finally manage to solve the mistery regarding the unresponsive LL quadrant of the ETMY ESD (see this and this). So from now on we can add the 4 quadrants in our measurements.

Another measurement was take today (before seeing the effect of green light on the charging of the ETMY) to see repeatibility of measurements or stationarity of the charge.

I attach here the document including the new measurements as well as a comparison plot with the results of Veff and slopes between the data taken 2 days ago (this is 3 days after the 2nd discharge run) and the data taken here.

A summary table is given next with the current values in green (for each quadrant), and we compare them with the measurements before the discharge runs (in blue) and the measurements taken 2 days ago after discharge run2 (in red):

Conclusions: During the last two days the charge of all quadrants has changed considerably bringing it back for some quadrants to same level (or worse) than before the ionized gas discharge runs took place. Look particularly to quadrant UR in pitch where we manage to do a full discharge after the 2nd discharge run but the current measurement shows again a high charge. The only think related to the ESD that has been done today before the measurements is solving the issue with LL quadrant which required turning off the ESD drive and also moving around some cables at the ESD BIAS low pass filter box. In principle this should not have caused a change in the ETMY charge.