(Kate G, Jeremy B, Matt H)

Quick summary alog...more detailed one to come

HAM3

After Stuart gave both suspensions a clean bill of health (so we know that as of this morning they were good)..I locked the face stops of the intermediate and bottom mass so that Jeff B could start cleaning.

HAM2

ALL OPTICS HAVE FIRST CONTACT ON THEM. It was a Herculean effort today......especially by Kate, but we managed to get all four optics in HAM2 first contacted from start to finish today, including outer crusts painted and peek pull tabs. We did have to remove another baffle today (the one attached to the PR3 structure that is used to prevent the wire heating), so not quite ready for SEI to begin balancing yet. I need to put all the baffles, EQ stops, etc that have removed to allow FCing to be done back. But give Jeremy and I 1.5-2 hours to put it all back together and should have it ready.

I dont have the photos/details on particle counts, etc but in the near future hoprfully Kate or I will have some spare time to write about.

After securing doors on HAM4, TFs taken indicated an issue with the actuation for the SR2 M1 LF BOSEM channel (see LHO aLOG entry 12923). Upon investigation this was found to be due to a loose connector on the air side of the chamber flange (see LHO aLOG entry 12942) and must have developed during chamber close-out activities.

Phase 3a TF measurements have been retaken for all stages of the SR2 suspension as follows:-  

- SR2 M1-M1 undamped (2014-07-23_1300_H1SUSSR2_M1_ALL_TFs.pdf)
- SR2 M2-M2 undamped (2014-07-23_1500_H1SUSSR2_M2_ALL_TFs.pdf)
- SR2 M3-M3 undamped (2014-07-23_1600_H1SUSSR2_M3_ALL_TFs.pdf)

HAM4 ISI Status: ISI unlocked, no damping or isolation loops running.

SR2 alignment: No offset was applied during this measurement.

SR2 undamped measurements for each stage have been compared with other H1 HSTS suspensions at Phase 3a of testing (allhstss_2014-07-23_Phase3a_H1SR2_*_ALL_ZOOMED_TFs.pdf).

Summary: 

M1-M1 TFs verify that the actuation problem has been solved, with L & Y DOFs now exhibiting expected performance, and raise no new concerns.
 
M2-M2 TFs, show good agreement with the model and are consistent with other H1 HSTS suspensions.

M3-M3 TFs, while noisy, again, thees show good agreement with the model and are consistent with other H1 HSTS suspensions.

All data, scripts and plots have been committed to the sus svn as of this entry.

   Did a vacuum and wipe down cleaning in HAM3. The visual inspection with the flashlight array did not show large amounts of contamination inside the chamber. There were many large pieces of metal in the wells underneath the support tubes. After removing this debris, wiping did not show additional metal on the Alpha wipe. 

   Particle counts were somewhat high during most of the cleaning, due to the disturbance of vacuuming and wiping. The counts spiked when Betsy & Travis entered BSC1, but they dropped back to “normal” background levels in a few minutes. What seemed to lower the particle counts significantly was having the top half of the soft cover open. One data point does not make a trend, but this is something to keep an eye on.

Location				                 0.3	0.5	1.0
West side cleanroom cover on		14	4	2
In chamber Cover on			202	96	16
In chamber cover on +5 minutes	88	40	13
In chamber cover top half open	3	1	1
After vacuum cover on			339	182	36

East side cleanroom cover on		0	0	0
In chamber cover on			222	126	22
B&T in BSC1 cover on HAM3		668	435	101
In chamber cover on +5 minutes	286	161	29
In chamber cover top half open	17	13	9
After vacuum cover on			74	42	17
After wipe down cover on             	421	216	47

West side cleanroom cover on		32	19	3
In chamber cover on			251	143	37
In chamber cover top half open	37	16	6
   Betsy & Travis exit BSC1 during the west side wipe down
After wipe down cover on	         	340	182	34
After wipe down cover on + 10 min  115	70	16

From one of the ops workstations in the back of the control room. Should finish about the time of the morning meeting. No touching, please.

Betsy, Travis

As Jeff mentioned in his log below, this afternoon we payloaded the ITMy SUS with:

- Sleeve

- Wedges

- Cross braces

- Vibration absorbers

- All trays, shields, and TFE support pieces removed

- We have 3 3/4" screws and 1 wafer holder to add, but these will be quick.

This involved the usual removal of 3 flooring panels to get the sleeve on, and their subsequent replacement.

Counts in the chamber before starting the work just after lunch were:

0.3um  60

0.5um  40

1.0um  20

An hour later during the high-traffic period of all of the above by just Travis and I, the counts were:

0.3um  1000

0.5um  550

1.0um  320

And then 20 mins later:

0.3um  540

0.5um  320

1.0um  120

Note, during the elevated counts Jeff had HAM3 soft covers open and was crawling around that table cleaning.  More likely the higher counts were us with the heavy lifting and numerous screw attachments.

DarkhanT, MikeV, Shivarajk, ForrestS, TravisS

We have completed our alignments and measurements at Xend.

The Pcal transmitter and receiver modules are installed, bellows are in place, and viewport protector gates are removed.

The key for the power supply that energizes the laser has been removed.

The Xend VEA is now in Laser Safe (at least that is how we left it an hour ago).

More to follow regarding ETM reflectivity and optical efficiency measurements.

The unstable Ry HEPI Dof suggested we check for rubbing from stops.  Ran Range of Motion & Linearity tests this morning.  The ROM is good to 0.7mm and the linearity results look fine too.

9:15- Heading into the LVEA (HAM 2) to apply First Contact – Matt/ Kate/Jeremy 
9:19- 9:30 Quick Trip to the LVEA (Mike V)
10:15- PCAL work at End X – Mike V/Rick S/Student/
10:31- 11:48 Going into the LVEA for HAM 3 cleaning – Jeff B.
10:37- 12:22 Work on BSC2/BSC1 – Betsy/Travis
10:40 - Work on Optics Lab/Laser ON – Nathan
10:44- 12:00 Heading into the LVEA to work on SR2(Testing) – Stuart
10:58- ITMY Alignment in the LVEA – Jason
12:41- Back to HAM3 – Jeff B.
13:00-15:48-Back to work on  BSC2 
14:11-Back to HAM2- Matt/Kate
14:43- Heading into the LVEA to run some tests (Electrical Field Measurement) with Electrometer – Mike/Gerardo
15:20- Doing some work outside by the beam tube – Robert & students

J. Kissel

Betsy, Travis, and Jason have finished initial alignment of the Reaction Chain on H1 SUS ITMY. Over lunch, I've run a set of DTT transfer functions to confirm we're not rubbing in a way that would affect the IAS assessment. The TFs reveal the chain is free as a bird, so the IAS numbers are legit. Nice work, team!

They're beginning to "payload" the SUS now (add the stiffening sleeve, vibration absorbers, etc.), and we'll take a full set of TFs again tonight, including the Main Chain to confirm all is well.

All scripts and data have been committed to the svn.

[Stuart Hugh Arnaud]

Following on alogs 12929 and 12902, an other test was carried out on SR3 giving a bettter understanding of why its first vertical mode was damped. The same V2V tf was taken with the ISI damped, and interestingly enough the Q of this mode gets higher when the ISI is damped, cf attached screenshot.

It appears that the rotational modes of this HAM are also around 1Hz (looking at Rx Ry TF from an ISI measurement taken in May cf attachment), mode that we were certainly exciting when driving the suspension along the vertical axis with the ISI undamped.

At first we were wondering why some previous vertical measurements were showing high Q resonances, but quickly realized that those were taken with the ISI either locked or half locked (from July 15th ISI was locked, from yesterday when doors were off, Matt half locked the ISI to back off the EQ stops).

Manual DTT transfer functions are now running on SR2 for the next few hours.

Measurements made yesterday indicated a problem on the SR2 (HSTS) M1 LF BOSEM channel (see LHO aLOG entry 12923), they also suggested it was an actuation issue and not sensing. This was confirmed this morning by applying offsets to each M1 channel in-turn and monitoring the sensor response (see SR2_M1_Offsets.png below).

Therefore, I've been further investigating this problem in the LVEA, first by using a break-out board at the Satellite Box (field cable H1:SUS_HAM4-10), to measure DC coil resistances as follows:-

T1 Pins = 10-23, R = 40.6 Ohm
T2 Pins = 7-20,  R = 40.1 Ohm
T3 Pins = 4-17,  R = 39.6 Ohm
LF Pins = 1-14,  R = Open Circuit

Thus verifying the issue was down-stream, i.e. either with the field cable or in-chamber.

I then repeated the same DC coil resistance measurements at the other end of the field cable i.e. the air side of the vacuum flange (HAM4-D6):-

T1 Pins = 10-23, R = 38.9 Ohm
T2 Pins = 7-20,  R = 38.4 Ohm
T3 Pins = 4-17,  R = 37.8 Ohm
LF Pins = 1-14,  R = 38.4 Ohm

Confirming that the issue resided with the in-air side of the flange with the field cable. I re-seated and tightened the connector at the flange and this rectified the problem.

Applying an offset to the M1 LF channel now exhibits the expected behavior (see SR2_M1_LF_Offset.png below).

A full set of TFs will now need to be taken to ensure there are no further issues with this suspension.

n.b. this issue is essentially identical to the loose cable connection at the air-side of the flange that was recently reported for H1 ITMX (see LHO aLOG entry 12544).

Attendees: Peter, Christina, Hugh, Stuart, Richard, John, Vern, Matt, Daniel, Mitchell, Gerardo, Aaron, Kate, Jeff B, Patrick, Travis, Betsy, , Jodi, Jeff K, Mitchell, Arnaud, etc …

Today's Tasks:

•	HAM 5 - Transfer Function Results are still showing problems on SR3. Investigation will continue today (Stuart/Arnaud)
•	HAM 3 – Cleaning will be done today by Jeff B. Alignment will be done tomorrow.  
•	First Contact application work on HAM 2 (Matt H/Kate/Jeremy)
•	Work will continue on Illuminator at End Y/ Picture will be taken (Aaron/Richard)
•	Cavity Baffle work (Betsy/Travis)
•	Mitchell will get Dog Clamps needed for Cavity Baffle.
•	BSC 2 Testing - Jim
•	Safety Talk : Be aware of animals on the road/ Don’t forget to read David Nolting document about “Complacency” (John W)

Calum, Rich, Matt

HAM4

The soft cover on the South door was not billowing at all. Despite the obviously low purge air and Matt working in HAM4, the initial particle counts were low. Before starting work, I wiped down everything I could reach with a pre-wetted wipe. Calum and I inspected the optic with a green flashlight (not to be confused with the Green Lantern, D1400060). For both faces of SR2, we estimated 25-100 particles per square inch depending on the region. BEFORE applying FC, we found a ~1 inch piece of leftover FC from the alignment layer on the HR side, and what appears to be a long strand of FC on an earthquake stop. There were numerous glove prints and leftover FC on both faces near the barrel. Because the HSTS legs are warped from welding, we had to use 2 washers on a side of the spray cone bracket to keep the cone on its intended track. Not surprisingly, the particle counts spiked while spraying FC. The "CAL Alarm" popped up on the count taken while spraying. I need to look up the settings for the handheld particle counters to check what that means. The FC appeared much thinner and had more bubbles than usual, but there were less cobwebs than we observed on Saturday. We moved on to HAM5 to let the FC dry.

Matt returned later to retract then remove the spray cone. The wipe on the end of the cone stuck against the optic when the cone was retracted. This has never happened before at either site, not even when a cone was left on overnight. I used the same procedure (E1300017) as always. Matt pulled very gently on the wipe, and it separated from the optic. I painted 3 layers of FC around the edges and added a PEEK tab. The painted crust was much darker in color than the sprayed FC.

HAM5

Like HAM4, there appeared to be very little purge air. Spraying SR2 with FC only a few minutes earlier likely caused the high initial particle count in HAM5. SR3's HR side had 10-30 particles per square inch and a big streak of FC from the alignment layer plus small bits of FC near the barrel. SR3 was sprayed on Saturday. A modified mix with slightly more thinner was used for the 1st layer in an attempt to reduce cobwebbing. It worked, but there was more backsplash (contained by the cone). The standard 1:1 mix ratio of FC and thinner was used for the 2nd and 3rd spray layers.

On Sunday, we removed the cone and painted the crust on SR3. The dried FC spray looked uneven and runny.

BSC2

The beamsplitter was absolutely filthy, and had over 50-100+ particles per square inch. There were tiny circles all over the HR side that looked like rings left by evaporation. There were noticeably more fibers on the AR side. Both faces had glove prints and lefover FC near the barrel. I didn't get any good pictures unfortunately.

I sprayed both faces on Friday, and painted the crusts on Sunday. Like SR3, the FC on the BS was extremely runny.

I'll add photos soon.

model restarts logged for Tue 22/Jul/2014
2014_07_22 11:24 h1susetmy
2014_07_22 11:31 h1susetmy
2014_07_22 11:35 h1susetmy
2014_07_22 11:43 h1susetmy
2014_07_22 15:06 h1pemcs
2014_07_22 15:08 h1broadcast0
2014_07_22 15:08 h1dc0
2014_07_22 15:08 h1fw0
2014_07_22 15:08 h1fw1
2014_07_22 15:08 h1nds0
2014_07_22 15:08 h1nds1
2014_07_22 15:08 h1pemex

no unexpected restarts. HWWD testing, PEM channel name changes, supporting DAQ restart.

[Arnaud P, Stuart A]

Following doors being re-hung on the HAM5 chamber earlier today (see LHO aLOG entry 12915), Phase 3a DTT TF measurements have been taken this afternoon for SR3 (HLTS) suspension as follows:-  

- SR3 M1-M1 undamped results (2014_07_22_1200_H1SUSSR3_M1_ALL_TFs.pdf)

HAM5 ISI Status: ISI unlocked, no damping or isolation loops running.

SR3 alignment: No offset was applied during this measurement.

SR3 undamped measurements from above have been compared with previous measurements for H1 SR3 at Phase 3a of testing (allhltss_2014-07-22_Phase3a_H1SR3_UnDamp_ALL_ZOOMED_TFs.pdf). The plot key is as follows:-

Blue Trace = Model (hltsopt_metal)
Orange Trace = H1 SR3 M1 (2014−07−15_1089513028), (in-chamber, doors open)
Black Trace = H1 SR3 M1 (2014−07−21_1090036316), (in-chamber, doors hung)
Magenta Trace = H1 SR3 M1 (2014_07_22_1200), (in-chamber, doors hung)

It can be seen that despite having gone in-chamber to improve the M3 alignment and attempt to mitigate any sources of rubbing (which we thought we had) the peculiar damping of the first vertical mode persists. Furthermore, comparing before (Black trace) and after (Magenta trace) there appears to be no improvement.

Somewhat frustratingly, before closing up the chamber, higher resolution measurements of the vertical DOF TF had indicated that the potential rubbing issue had been alleviated (see SR3_V2V_Doors_Open_vs_Closed.png).

We had considered the possibility of hanging the door may have changed the air flow due to purge air, so we carried out a measurement both with purge air on and off (SR3_V2V_PurgeAir_Off_vs_On.png), but again this failed to improve the Q of the first vertical peak.

Finally, a measurement was made with damping loops on for comparison (see SR3_V2V_Damping_On_vs_Off.png), which seems stable.

Also, last night Arnaud repeated the vertical TF while applying +/- biases to various degrees of freedom to try and check in which way SR3 could have been hung up, but to no avail.

Attached below is a log of particle counts taken during the HAM5 work covering the duration 1035 to 1126 (local).

All data, scripts and plots have been committed to the sus svn as of this entry.