Jeff B & Andres R We moved the HLTS suspension SR3 into position to have the metal Bottom Mass replaced with the Glass Optic. We took height and blade tip breakoff measurements as a pre-installation base line. All measurements are within tolerances. Measurement Point Target/Tolerance Measurement Top Blade Wire Breakoff 806.12mm 804.93mm, 805.89mm Bottom of T-Block 552.23mm 552.60mm Top of Intermediate Mass 461.63mm 461.63mm Lower Blade Wire Breakoff 608.84mm tip coplanar <0.5mm 607.75mm, 608.11mm, Coplanar = 0.36mm Top of Bottom Mass 291.0mm +-1mm 291.17mm The next step is to center and adjust the OSEMs, and then run Phase 2A Transfer Functions.
Corrected daqdrc file, restarted daqd on h1nds1.
In preparation for installing sensor correction I took a ground to platform transfer function to see what kind of coherence we have, short answer is lots from 0,1 to a few hertz
The aLOG will be down for maintenance tomorrow at noon (pacific time). Please post or save your log entries before the maintenance.
The downtime is being moved earlier in the day to 11:30am pacific.
The work is completed
I commented out the DC watchdog components in /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/cds/h1/alarmfiles/h1cds_iop_sus_watchdog_b123.alhConfig.
Done.
Getting alignment targets from end X and installing them on TMS at end Y.
Frame writer 1 daqd and nds1 daqd were restarted to read new daqdrc files to allow writing of raw minute files in the proper place, following moving of old files to a different file system.
Jeff B. & Kate G. A horizontal 4" witness plate (wafer) and horizontal 1" optic (S/N 1247) were placed near the center of the SEI table on Feb 5th. A vertical 1" optic (S/N 1245) was mounted on the HR side of SR2. A vertical wafer still needs to be set near SR2. Important notes: Witness samples were not placed immediately after the chamber was opened. Jeff did some cleaning before SR2 was installed and the wafers and optics were placed. Also, the 1" optics were removed from their PET G containers, put in PEEK holders, double bagged, and stuck in a bag with other tools before going in chamber. I didn't see obvious scratches in the First Contact, so hopefully the samples weren't damaged.
On Feb 7th, I used a handheld particle counter in the cleanroom around HAM4 and in chamber before starting work. The counts seemed really high. The particle counter (used for trending data) on the +X side of the chamber was not working.
Size (um) | Cleanroom Count | Chamber Count |
---|---|---|
0.3 | 10725 | 17177 |
0.5 | 2518 | 3895 |
0.7 | 1075 | 1562 |
1.0 | 586 | 798 |
2.0 | 169 | 213 |
5.0 | 1 | 0 |
I placed a vertical wafer near the HR side of SR2, and inspected the cleanliness of the chamber with a flashlight array. There were a few particles on the witness samples (which had not seen work since they were placed two days earlier), and a lot of contamination on the TCS HWS optics and SEI table. The dark iPhone photos don't do it justice.There was only time for a quick cleaning using the TigerVac and IPA soaked wipes. It would be helpful to get a PET swipe sample the next time work is done in HAM4.
Maybe Stefan turned these off, I didn't catch such in the alog. I thought I left these in some Isolation state yesterday as Stefan wanted PRMI asap.
ITMY is damping with a Stage2 trip from GS13 limits. The BS has no trip indicator but is damping only.
The HEPIs here are running normally.
I just noted the detail in Kiwamu's log about turning them off but he did not note a specific problem.
Stefan and I found that the BS oplev was oscillating because of probably a loop instability. Disabling and enabling them at H1:SUS-BS_M2_OLDAMP_P(Y) made it stable again. It had been oscillating for more than 15 hours. The attached is the trend.
posted by Kiwamu, not Stefan, sorry.
Stefan and I lowered the threshold value of the ref cav transmitted light because it was preventing FSS from a smooth recovery. It is now 0.4.
Posted by Kiwamu, not Stefan.
Stefan, Lisa, Kiwamu,
Our goal tonight was to lock PRMI with the 3f signals. However we didn't reach that point yet because of a (perhaps new) issue in the PRMI locking.
A good news is that the power build up was high because of the ring heater on ITMY which had been set at 4 W in total. POPAIR_B_RF18 went to 8000 counts.
40 Hz unidentified oscillation in PRMI signals:
After some tweak of alignment and gains, we managed to lock PRMI with the sidebands being resonant. However the PRMI lock was fragile for some reason. In particular, it lost the lock frequently when we changed the PRC gain. We took spectra of the signals and were surpprised by a huge peak in both PRC and MICH signals. This was causing a DAC saturation in the M2 stage of PRM which made the PRC loop unstable. This is something we didn't see before. We looked at some previous spectra from the last long stretch of 3rd of February (alog 9809) and confirmed that there was no such oscillation at that time. The attached shows spectrum of various signals from tonight. It is obvious that there is a broad and prominent oscillation at around 40 Hz in each signal. Note that when I took this data, I had a notch in PRM M2 stage to mitigate the saturation and that's why the PRM_M2 signal look a bit suppressed at around 30 Hz.
We tried to lower the UGF of PRCL, but the oscillation persisted. In fact the peak moves as we changes the UGF. For example, lowering the UGF also brings the peak frequency lower. We suspected a gain peaking and tried to move the UGF, but somehow the gain margin was so narrow that we could not move around so much. According to a quick swept sine measurement, the UGF was at around 40 Hz.. Another thing we suspected was a roll mode which is usually at around 40 Hz in the case of the small triple suspension. Since we failed to lower the UGF, we could not really try a notch technique to minimize unwanted excitation. We also looked at MC_F because we suspected the roll mode of MC2, but there was no visible oscillation at all. I also quickly tried the PRX locking to see if it still persists, but I didn't see any oscillation in PRX.
We are still unable to identify this oscillation.
Some other notes:
Stefan, Lisa, Kiwamu,
The X arm is now quiter due to the oplev on ETMX and we are now becoming able to assess the noise performance.
Since Stefan got the oplev active loop running on ETMX and made the arm quitter, we wanted to measure the ALS infrared frequency noise by locking the PSL to the X arm using the green beatnote. The hand off process was very smooth tonight and we could try many times to bring the PSL frequency close to the arm resonance. Stefan engaged the additive offset path on top of the MCL feedback. We measured the UGF to be 3.6 kHz with a phase margin of about 64 deg.
It seems that the CARM noise is now suppressed to ~ a few 100 Hz which is unfortunately still greater than the arm linewidth of about 84 Hz. Because the fringe moved more than its linewidth, we could not confine it within the linear range. The below is a screenshot of the PDH signal in StripTool. You can see that the PDH signal, which in blue, goes back and forth around a resonance, resulting in a periodic funny shape. Also it looked like we need to have some more gain at low frequencies because we saw a low frequency excursion in the error signal.
Even though the PDH signal was pretty much out of the linear range, we calibrated REFLAIR_A_RF45 using Alexa's formula (see alog 7054) and tentatively made a noise spectrum which, of course, underestimated the actual noise due to a low optical gain. One thing we immediately noticed was that there is a 70 Hz broad peak which maybe a vibration of the periscope on ISCT1. It looks quite similar to what we had in HIFO-Y. We are not sure what this is at this point.
Note that the ISCT1 hepa filter has been intentionally off in order to get low noise.