Displaying reports 73841-73860 of 76964.Go to page Start 3689 3690 3691 3692 3693 3694 3695 3696 3697 End
Reports until 19:45, Thursday 21 June 2012
LHO General
jonathan.berliner@LIGO.ORG - posted 19:45, Thursday 21 June 2012 - last comment - 10:25, Friday 22 June 2012(3215)
Thursday Ops Log (One Arm Test Edition)
- One Arm Test Begins: Gate valves opened, and the laser has been sent down the arm. If you find the beam, let Keita or Rana know ASAP.
- Safety discussion: If the work involves manipulating components in the beam path, including viewport covers and gate valves, the LSO must be notified. In addition, all viewport covers must bare a warning that removal requires approval by the LSO.
- BSC8: Transfer functions today. Discussions at morning meeting about coordinating cleaning with measurements. Decision was to hold off on cleaning until this is resolved. Also, GV-6 was opened. In addition to Illuminator lights, Rana and Keita were using a flashlight to locate the green laser beam.
- BSC6: HEPI transfer functions. Richard installed cameras yesterday and set up the Illuminator lights. The cameras are still being worked on, as the analog feed from EndY is not great.GV-17 was opened.
- HAM5: ICC ongoing.
- HAM2: ISI - Electronics work.
- HAM3: ISI - Richard doing cable-pulling prior to entry
- ISCT4 is cleaned and ready to be moved to Betsy's spot.
- H1 PSL: Michael worked on the software and network connections.
- MidX everything out, grout beginning next week.
- EndX prep beginning.
- Craning: Moving doors in the LVEA (HAM5 and HAM6), crane in staging building (Corey).
- LSB HVAC work to begin Friday morning.
- Pickup+Delivery of cardboard recycling.
- Riverside High School visited in the morning.
Comments related to this report
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 10:25, Friday 22 June 2012 (3227)

Excellent Summary for your final Operator log.  :) We'll miss 'em!

H2 ISC
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - posted 19:19, Thursday 21 June 2012 - last comment - 15:11, Friday 22 June 2012(3214)
One arm test Day One: No light found at IY (Thomas, Elli, Aidan, Richard, Rana, Keita)

We set up a CCD camera looking at ITMY and the entire baffle and some more, sent a green beam from EY, modulated its angle by using PZTs, and found nothing on the camera. No luck with the baffle diode, either.

It seems like the beam is not getting to the corner station at all.

One (or more) of three things should be true:

  1. The ETMY is not pointing to the ITMY. The beam from ALS table is very close to retro-reflection by the ETM when TMS and MCL PZTs are in a neutral position.
  2. Because of a factor of 20 reduction in angle in the telescope, we're not wiggling the angle enough (however I doubt this).
  3. Mode matching is so bad that, by the time the beam reaches the corner, the beam diameter is 4m or something.

Tomorrow we should use HEPI and/or ISI to move everything by a milli radian or so in YAW.

The reason why I think we're already wiggling enough is because, when we wiggle MCL PZTs, I can see on the CCD camera monitoring ETMY that the motion is so big the beam falls off of the primary.  It's not impossible that this is all in translation and not in angle, but we used both PZTs that are placed at different Gouy phase positions and we didn't see anything at IY.

Comments related to this report
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - 20:24, Thursday 21 June 2012 (3216)

As a side note, 1/20 angle reduction only applies to the tilt upstream of TMS telescope (e.g. PZT on the ALS table).

For the rotatoin of TMS itself, it should be 19/20 or 21/20. However, we (Rana and I) felt as if TMS rotation is not producing enough beam rotation. We should calibrate the TMS angle to know how much we're actually tilting it by measuring the displacement of the retro reflected beam on the ALS table.

Also, we need to keep the optical axis fixed to the TMS even during the alignment, which (among other things) means that the TMS angle and the ALS beam angle on the ALS table should always be moved by the same amount. Elli and Thomas are working on the QPD servo for this.

rana.adhikari@LIGO.ORG - 00:24, Friday 22 June 2012 (3217)

Some details on the sensitivity of the search:

* For the ETMY camera, we are only a few meters from the TM. The iris is opened up as far as it can go and still stay nearly focused on the mirror (as seen w/ illuminator on).

* For the ITMY camera, we are ~30m away at the spool position. A large maglight flashlight injected from there can easily be seen on the baffle, the chamber, and the optic.

* The light from the flashlight shows up as ~10000 cts on the baffling photodiodes (mounted near the ITM). Wiggling the green beam from the end produces no signal as seen on the camera and if it produces any signal on the baffle PDs, it must be below the noise level of ~50 cts-rms. Given that the flashlight puts out ~500-1000 lumens, how big of a signal should the green beam make if its the right size?

* Assuming that we inject ~10 mW into the ETMY and that it has a transmission of ~1.5% for 532 nm, we should get ~100 uW of light at ITMY. By comparison, when we hunted for the iLIGO beams, we were injecting ~100 mW at the PRM and ~50-100 uW would get through to the ETM before lock (in the single arm config). The silicon CCDs should pick up the green light much better than the IR, so we should be seeing some beam on the chamber walls, etc. We were injecting non-integer frequency sine waves simultaneously into both pitch and yaw for the PZT, so I think its unlikely that we were unluckily sitting in some dark space.

* We need an SEI & SUS expert to inspect the HEPI/ISI & the ETMY angle biases to ensure that they are pointed in the right direction as determined by the IAS.

rana.adhikari@LIGO.ORG - 09:37, Friday 22 June 2012 (3222)

Video of the swinging beam on the ITM (left) and ETM (right)

Non-image files attached to this comment
rana.adhikari@LIGO.ORG - 10:01, Friday 22 June 2012 (3224)

Images of the ETMY as seen from the spool cam: illuminator on (left) and off (right)

Images attached to this comment
aidan.brooks@LIGO.ORG - 15:11, Friday 22 June 2012 (3235)

I calculated roughly what the intensity of light should be on the baffle PDs. Rana's 500 lumen flashlight was emitting around 10W of light. I assumed this was filling an area roughly 1m in diameter - this yields an intensity of 13W/m^2. The corresponding intensity for the green beam at the ITM (assuming 100uW is transmitted through the ETM and the beam radius is ~5cm at the ITM) is about 12mW/m^2. So the response of the PDs to the green beam should be ~1000x less than the response to the flashlight.

LHO General
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:49, Thursday 21 June 2012 (3212)
plots of dust counts
Attached are plots of dust counts > .5 microns. I have also attached plots of the modes for dust monitor 1 at end Y, dust monitor 1 in the LVEA and dust monitor 1 in the optics lab to show when they were disconnected. The disconnection at end Y appears to have occurred before the LVEA and labs, indicating that something happened there before the accidental power down of h0epics2.
Non-image files attached to this report
H1 AOS
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:47, Thursday 21 June 2012 - last comment - 15:05, Friday 22 June 2012(3213)
ITM-08 (LLO ITM) Ears bonded successfully this week

On behalf of Gerardo and Danny:

Both ears were silicate bonded to the LLO ITM (ITM-08) this week.  The mass has been stowed back in it's cake tin and await shipment out to LLO. 

Comments related to this report
gerardo.moreno@LIGO.ORG - 15:05, Friday 22 June 2012 (3233)

(GMoreno, DSellers, BBland, GMorenoJr.)

ITM08 ears were bonded succesfully, ears with SN 59 and SN 64 were used.

SN 59 was used for side S3, and SN 64 for side S4.

After setting the mass on the base of cake tin, a full inspection of ears and mass was performed, no problems found.

Attached are photos of ears on ITM08.  Also a photo of the mass as I was putting it away in its cake tin, ready for shipping.

Images attached to this comment
LHO General
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:30, Thursday 21 June 2012 (3211)
h0epics2 restarted, h0epics1 shutdown
h0epics2 was accidentally powered down. This affected the following IOCs: h0dustlvea, h0dustlab, h0dustey, h0fmcs, h0weatherex, h0weatherey, h0weathermx, h0weathermy. h0epics1 has been powered down and its power cables moved to h0epics2. The only IOC running on h0epics1 was h0time. This has not been restarted. There seems to be a problem with the mouse on the KVM for h0epics2. A usb mouse can be used until this is fixed.
H2 ISC
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:05, Thursday 21 June 2012 (3210)
refcav locking trouble

Earlier in the day we had a hard time locking refcav, and I've found that the voltage supply for the RF amplifier was current limited.
 I set it to maximum and the problem was gone.

H1 PSL
michael.rodruck@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:19, Thursday 21 June 2012 (3209)
FSS gain changes

Rick S, Michael R

After some work to optimize gain settings the FSS_FAST_GAIN has been set to 0.2 and FSS_COMMON_GAIN to 0.8. The gain slider on the MEDM screens is not accurate - a change of 0.1 dB on the slider is actually a change of 3 dB.

A new DBB measurement was created and is attached. A snapshot of the open loop transfer function and the error signal are attached as well.

Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
H2 ISC
richard.mccarthy@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:10, Thursday 21 June 2012 (3208)
Cameras and Illuminators for One Arm
Installed one watec 902H with a 300x zoom lens on the Y beam manifold looking at the baffle for ITMy.  Installed an illuminator on a BSC8 port in the vertex with remote controllable power supply for access from EY.

Installed a Sony camera on BSC 6 spool looking at the ETM.  And an illuminator on a spool port that is powered from the old DC power rack in the LVEA.  

Ported the video signal from the LVEA to the End station and From the end station to the MSR but have a problem with the MSR as we can not get sync. so lines are rolling through the frames.

Will work on getting video into the control room later.



X1 SEI
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:03, Thursday 21 June 2012 (3207)
HAM Assembly Progress
GregG, MitchR, CoreyG, JimW

Today Stage1 was completed and flown to the test stand where it was connected to Stage0 on our seventh assembly. This means that MOST of the mechanical superstructure on LHO's last HAM ISI is completed. Still a lot to do (spring pull-down, actuator and sensor installs, optical table, etc.) but most of the remaining sub-assemblies are put together and are just waiting to be attached. The finish line has never been closer...
H1 SUS
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:59, Thursday 21 June 2012 (3206)
IMCC-02 first secondary prism glued

(Betsy, Danny)

The first secondary prism was glued to MC2 yesterday. It witnessed a 12-16 hour room temperature cure followed by 6 hours of heat lamp curing.  The optic was stowed in its cake tin for HVAC work planned in the lab tomorrow.  The second primary and secondary prisms will be glued on to the optic next week.

H2 FMP
jodi.fauver@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:00, Thursday 21 June 2012 - last comment - 09:08, Friday 22 June 2012(3205)
BSC8 Testing
I applied lots of caution tape to the bottom of the spiral staircase to prevent folks from accessing the stairs, E-module, or work platforms around the chamber. I will apply appropriate signage tomorrow.
Comments related to this report
jodi.fauver@LIGO.ORG - 09:08, Friday 22 June 2012 (3220)
Signage was added this morning: DO NOT ENTER Sensitive measurements in progress. If access is needed, please contact Control Room at ext. 202. See photo below.
Images attached to this comment
H1 FMP
jodi.fauver@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:55, Thursday 21 June 2012 (3204)
HAM6 Bay Clean-up
I spent some time today clearing paraphernalia from ISCT10 and then consulted with Keita as to disposition of said items. Keita will follow-up on getting items put away appropriately. He also asked for the table to be craned into the Squeezer Enclosure so Bubba and crew will take care of that tomorrow.
H1 FMP
jodi.fauver@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:50, Thursday 21 June 2012 (3203)
HAM5/6 ICC
First thing this morning, the doors were returned to HAM6 and the south door was removed from HAM5. Brushing was completed in HAM5 before lunch.(The condition of this chamber is much better than what we saw in HAM6 and cleaned up nicely.) After lunch, the crew did first vacuum, unwrapped the support tubes, vacuumed the bellows, and started wipe down. By the end of the day, about 1/2 the chamber had been wiped down: that is much closer to the rate of progress that we are used to instead of the VERY SLOW pace we saw in HAM6. We hope to close out tomorrow.
LHO VE
kyle.ryan@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:55, Thursday 21 June 2012 - last comment - 12:03, Thursday 21 June 2012(3199)
Corner Station and Y-end Station are open to the Y beam tube
 

Kyle- 
Soft-closed GV6, roughed-out GV1 annulus, valved-out BSC8 annulus aux. pump cart, opened GV5, GV6 and GV17
Comments related to this report
rana.adhikari@LIGO.ORG - 12:03, Thursday 21 June 2012 (3200)

Images attached to this comment
X1 SEI
hugo.paris@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:37, Thursday 21 June 2012 - last comment - 16:17, Friday 22 June 2012(3198)
HAM-ISI GS13: inspection of Defective Pod (#94) - Two Broken Flexures and Debris

One of the GS13s of HAM-ISI unit #6 (Pod #94) appeared to be defective this week (see aLog 3183).

Greg and I opened it this morning. Two flexures were broken.

One can see wear on the non-broken side of D0901319-v4, s/n199  (Pic. 3,4). The pattern is very similar to what Jim reported in the SEI Log a few months ago.

We also found a small flexure debris. This debris was identified as being part of D0901318-v3 s/n 124 (see black line on pic. 5).

The pod was tested at reception on a leveled surface. Nothing abnormal could be seen on its response at that time. It was then installed in the ISI. No major event was reported (drop/shock/…). Spectra were taken with the ISI tilted and the pod appeared defective. Any spectra, even with the ISI leveled showed it defective after that.

As it already happened, it is possible that the shocks, endured by the instrument during its shipment, damaged the flexures. In these conditions, tilting the pod back and forth to install it, and/or tilting the ISI for testing purposes, could have lead to the breakage.

We have shockwatch data for this shipment. Greg will post it later on.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
greg.grabeel@LIGO.ORG - 12:46, Thursday 21 June 2012 (3201)
This shipping log was less eventful, especially as the threshold had been set higher, than the previous LHO-LLO. A big difference in this shipment was the large vertical shocks whereas the previous one had seen mostly horizontal. 3 of the 4 events also happened in Louisiana going by the time stamps.
Images attached to this comment
hugo.paris@LIGO.ORG - 13:48, Thursday 21 June 2012 (3202)

It appears that pod #94 was already shiped back to LLO in March to be reworked after a pre-amp issue. see alog #2369.

Nothing was noticed on its flexures then. If the flexures were not changed at LLO, they saw at least 3 Livingston-Hanford trips .

In his aLog, Greg also mention a similar issue experienced on Pod #71: Working at reception. Stopped working afterwards. Opened and broken flexure found.

DCC document Q1100073 sensor issues tracking was updated.

hugo.paris@LIGO.ORG - 16:17, Friday 22 June 2012 (3236)

I went through the history/time-series/spectra available for the Pod #94 (H1).

06/05 the batch of GS13s the Pod #94 belongs to, is sent from LLO.

06/12 Pod #94, and all the pods of that batch, are huddle tested OK (Plot 1). None of their spectra show partiicularities (H2 channel corresponds to the horizontal GS13 #58 which was already in the ISI).

06/13 Pod #94 is installed in HAM-ISI Unit #6 with the Pod #66(H) from the same batch. Interfaces chassis are turned ON. All instruments are tested OK (Plot 2).

06/14 Plot.3 shows that Pod #94 was functional, with no particularities on its spectra, until the interfaces chassis were turned OFF around 3.45 PM

//Barrell nuts appeared to be missing on the walls behind the horizontal GS13s. Interfaces chassis were turned OFF at 3.45pm and GS13s were pulled out of the ISI. Barell nuts were added and GS13s were re-installed. GS13 walls were mounted and interfaces chassis were turned back ON//

06/19 Interfaces chassis are turned back ON around 10am. Pod #94 appears defective right away (Plot 4). It seems like the flexure breakage happened during the re-installation of the GS13s, even though no major event was reported (shock, drop, ...).

Time series before/after re-installation of the GS13s are attached (Plot 5).

 

I can not notice any feature on spectra/time series that would have warned us of upcoming flexure breakages.

While talking about it at today's SEI call, we agreed on gently tilting the GS13s back and forth before huddle testing them at reception, so we can discard the GS13s with flexures that are about to break.

Non-image files attached to this comment
H1 TCS
aidan.brooks@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:14, Thursday 21 June 2012 (3197)
Hartmann sensor beam - no clipping, but not a great beam
[Thomas, Aidan]

Thomas and I tracked the source of clipping on the Hartmann sensor beam. The return beam from the ETM was hitting the edge of one of the mirrors in the back corner of the ALS table (see attached diagram). We tweaked the alignment so that the beam was centered on that optic.

The new beam profile on the HWS is attached. There is no sign of clipping now, but the beam quality is a poor Gaussian. There also appears to be horizontal fringes on the beam.

Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
H2 ISC
daniel.sigg@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:58, Thursday 21 June 2012 (3196)
More ALS laser locking
Max F., Keita K., Daniel S.

We had a hard time finding the beat node by adjusting the crystal temperature. Once we came close to the correct frequency the line would simply vanish. This seems to be related to mode hopping. The diode current was about 1.43A. We noticed that increasing the diode current by simultaneously adjusting the temperature to keep the beat frequency close to 40MHz allowed us to widen the acceptable temperature range and improved the beat node strength. Around 1.9A there was another mode hope, so we backed off the diode current to 1.666A. This re-adjustment of the diode current seemed to have increased the gain in the PLL. We had to reduce the common gain to -23dB (down by 3dB) to make it stable again.

We also found that the gain in the digital temperature stabilization servo only has a small range where it would work. Adding 10dB would make it unstable, whereas subtracting 10dB made it go to the rails. Even with the correct gain, we noticed that the PZT voltage would often go beyond +/-1V. Our readback has a gain of 10 and saturates just above 1V. (This readback is used as the error point of the temperature stabilization servo.) The following changes were made to the ASL common mode board, S/N S1102638 (H2 EY): 
R272 removed (from 374), 
R271 replaced by 0 Ohm (from 3.32K). 
The readback now has a gain of 1 and the temperature servo should work over the full PZT range.
Displaying reports 73841-73860 of 76964.Go to page Start 3689 3690 3691 3692 3693 3694 3695 3696 3697 End