Displaying reports 75301-75320 of 86036.Go to page Start 3762 3763 3764 3765 3766 3767 3768 3769 3770 End
Reports until 15:15, Friday 28 March 2014
H1 ISC
jaclyn.sanders@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:15, Friday 28 March 2014 (11066)
ISCTEY handoff
I’ve been more or less solely responsible for commissioning ISCTEY at the end station, and the scope of the project has proven to be slightly larger than the amount of time I have left this trip. This is a summary of what’s left to do to finish commissioning the table. I’ve updated the Blue Team Punchlist to put these onto an “Active Tasks” sheet. 
 
PLL beatnote finding
 
The power and polarization of the fiber light has been drifting. As of yesterday, less than 40uW of power was making it to the table. Last week when Alexa and I first measured, we were getting more like 70uW. The polarization drifts over time, as expected and adjustable by the polarization controller. At the moment, the polarization monitor PD is aligned, but after aligning the PLL path, check to make sure this is still the case; it wasn’t aligned the other day, leading me to assume that the polarization was good when there was actually ~80% of the fiber power missing the polarization PD entirely.
 
For reference, the BBPD on the table has never been exposed to the shorted power cable, so any problems with it are not related to having been powered incorrectly. Also, remember to adjust the nominal power on the TMS green QPDs after optimizing the beatnote.
 
Analog video feedthrough
 
The analog video power cable is not connected because the feedthrough was filed out at some point, so the cable can’t be attached with screws. The two solutions proposed are epoxying the cable to the feedthrough or making a proper part. Either way, you will need to remove the feedthrough, fish the cable out of the table, install the cable, then replace the feedthrough. I have passed custody of this project on to Dick.
 
Wavefront sensing
 
The WFS paths are installed and nominally aligned, and the picomotor mirrors have been tested. The legacy WFS interface is in place at the EY field rack, but it is not cabled. Cables will need to be installed and the electronics will need to undergo the usual testing. The WFS on the table had good RF response in the EE shop but still need to be tested on-table. The return beam shape and quality also needs to be measured on these WFS paths.
 
Faraday mount
 
From the first beam measurement, it appears that the 532 path has some clipping. A new mount for the second Faraday isolator has been left on the bottom left corner of the table. This mount needs to be swapped in, and the beam needs to be realigned to the TMS using the irises on the table. Please check the iris position first, I placed them fairly well but I haven’t checked their positioning recently. The return path will also need to be realigned to the LSC RFPD and the wavefront sensors. 
 
HWS pickoff
 
The Hartmann sensor path will need a pickoff from the return beam. I received the beam sampler from Aidan today, but the wrong mounts were sent from Caltech. Once we receive open mounts, this optic needs to be installed between the second pico mirror and the first iris, and the beam aligned to the irises to return to the TMS. Thomas has custody of the beam samplers and the less-than-optimal mounts.

H1 AOS
filiberto.clara@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:10, Friday 28 March 2014 (11065)
ETMY Arm Cavity Baffle
Tested the forward voltage for the ACB diodes. 
BSC10 Flange F1-3C1 (air side).

Pin 1&2
PD forward voltage: 0.431V


Pin 4&5
PD forward voltage: 0.423V


Pin 7&8
PD forward voltage: 0.431V


Pin 10&11
PD forward voltage: 0.423V

All results within spec.
H1 SUS
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:31, Friday 28 March 2014 - last comment - 13:08, Monday 31 March 2014(11064)
EY closeout

Margot and I performed all of BSC10 closeout tasks listed in my previous alog regarding this closeout.  We pulled the FC from the ETMy optic a little after 11am, and the door was going on at ~1:30.  It took "so long" (ha) because we ended up having to spend some extra time calling in the troops about one of the ISC viewports having what appeared to be a scratch on it's inside surface.  More details to come as needed.

Comments related to this report
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - 18:44, Friday 28 March 2014 (11081)

Here are some further pictures of the ACB swing back and the FirstContact spray cone attachment to the HR side of the ETMy QUAD structure from yesterday.  Yes, the cone protrudes into the baffle.  Yes, Margot still was able to fit her head and an arm with the spray bottle in the cone.

The last picture shows the placement of the horizontal wafer and verticle 1" witness optic in the center of the chamber, placed today just before the door went on the chamber.

Images attached to this comment
margot.phelps@LIGO.ORG - 13:08, Monday 31 March 2014 (11097)
Notes and dcc numbers for Contamination Control Samples (ones that came out and ones that went in) to WBSC10 before doors went on:
1. Vertical 1’’ optics on QUAD: T1400246 (SN1195) out and T1400247 (SN 262) in. 
2. Vertical 1’’ optic under quad: T1400248 (SN261) placed at end of closeout.
3. Vertical wafer on quad: T1400249 attached to quad under HR of ETM.
4. Horizontal wafer on floor under quad:T1400250 placed at end of closeout.
5. Horizontal 1’’ optic: T1400251 was left on beam tube floor between BSC10 and BSC6. Looking up SN/history. Didn’t take it out, because we had no clean optic containers handy.
6. 24’’ PET swipe sample taken in tube near purge today close to end of closeout. Labeled, and taken to PET microscope area. 
H1 SEI (INS)
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:22, Friday 28 March 2014 - last comment - 14:00, Friday 28 March 2014(11061)
WHAM5 SEI Activities/Status--HEPI Floating & Unlocked

Jim locked the HAM5 ISI and then we floated the platform on HEPI.  A couple of Spring adjustments and we are level on the Optical Table to +-0.1mm.  Not sure about the elevation yet but it is likely close to Spec.  This will be good enough for continuing the ISI commissioning which we may get started before days end.

Please mind the signs--There are no optics here but HEPI is unlocked & floating; also please mind the Dial Indicators--Thanks--H

Comments related to this report
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - 14:00, Friday 28 March 2014 (11063)

Elevation of Optical Table is currently ~1mm low.  Target elevation is -325mmGz(D0901131-v1); the table is now at -326.2mm. Easy to correct during Initial Alignment.

H1 SEI
jeffrey.bartlett@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:30, Friday 28 March 2014 (11060)
ITMY HEPI Trip
ITMY HEPI tripped. Reset.  
Images attached to this report
H1 SEI
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:10, Friday 28 March 2014 - last comment - 14:28, Monday 07 April 2014(11059)
HAM2 HEPI L4C Trip

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
sebastien.biscans@LIGO.ORG - 14:28, Monday 07 April 2014 (11201)

For further record, it's actually HEPI-HAM3

H1 SEI
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:00, Friday 28 March 2014 (11058)
ETMX WD trip, request for operators

I've created a new folder on the desktop for WD trip plots, if operators could help us to plot and post these each time there is a trip it would be greatly appreciated.

You can create the plot by opening the WD screen, before untripping idenify the type of trip by looking for a red box in the First Trig column.  Use the blue buttons labaled Plot ACT trip to make the plots (it will pop up after a while).  Use the magnifying glass in the plot window to zoom the plot to the relevant time scale, then take a screen shot.  You can store this in the WDTrip folder on the desktop, and then post it in the alog. 

Images attached to this report
H1 SEI
fabrice.matichard@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:59, Friday 28 March 2014 (11057)
BSC-ISI Turn On Tests for the guardian

Jamie, Fabrice,

I am posting for the records and for discussion the WD trips we observe while tuning the turn on procedure for the guardian.

Non-image files attached to this report
H1 CDS (DAQ)
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:40, Friday 28 March 2014 (11054)
CDS model and DAQ restart report, Thursday 27th March 2014

no restarts reported.

H1 AOS (VE)
rainer.weiss@LIGO.ORG - posted 20:42, Thursday 27 March 2014 (11051)
Results of LHO Y1 accumulation on 03/24/2014
The results are given in the attached pdf file. The atmospheric leak rate is less than
5.5 +-0.6 x 10^-9 torr liters/sec. The hydrogen outgassing rate referred to 23C is
6.0 x 10^-14 torr liters/sec/cm^2 close to the value measured in 2000.
Non-image files attached to this report
H1 SUS
arnaud.pele@LIGO.ORG - posted 19:32, Thursday 27 March 2014 (11030)
TMSY last TF results before closeout

Last night, undamped transfer functions of H1 TMSY were ran (Phase 3a) with the ISI damped. 3 different drive amplitudes were tried to see if cables are not adding non linear effects.

In orange excitation amplitude is 10000, in black drive is 150000, in pink drive is 20000. TF is consistent throughout the drives.

Differences in frequency of resonnances can be seen in the L V R P degrees of freedom:

First roll mode at 0.68Hz splits in three modes 0.68Hz 0.72Hz and 0.79Hz
First Pitch mode at 0.74Hz splits in two modes at 0.72Hz and 0.79Hz
First Vertical mode at 0.69Hz splits in three modes at 0.67Hz 0.72Hz and 0.79Hz
Second Long mode at 0.74Hz (pitch coupling = first pitch mode) splits in two modes at 0.72Hz and 0.79Hz

All differences can certainly be explained by the change of cable routing when moving cartridge from BSC6 to BSC10. (For details on how the current routing looks like see pictures on alog 11021). Since the actuation is working properly, and the suspension still provides passive isolation above the resonnances, it seemed acceptable to move on with installation.

Non-image files attached to this report
H1 SUS
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - posted 19:27, Thursday 27 March 2014 - last comment - 18:38, Friday 28 March 2014(11049)
ETMy First Contact Applied

This morning, SEI, TMS, and SUS gave a cursory "approval" of their systems in order to proceed with chamber close-out tasks.  So, after lunch, Margot and I applied First Contact to the ETMy-HR surface which will be pulled just before closing the door tomorrow.  The order of events this afternoon (and late morning in order to catch the alog up):

Jim locked the ISI and put final touches on chamber feedthru cable routing.

Apollo+Joe+Gerardo had a viewport party at the BSC10/6 area.

Margot and I locked the lowest masses of the ETMy QUAD.  Then we,

Secured the ACB locking bracket and used the wedge to swing it back and prop it into place.  See notes on this in attached alog.

Attached the FC QUAD cone to the structure and sprayed FC (standard 3 coats) on the HR surface.

Removed the cone from the suspension.  Finished FC layer reinforcement.

Removed the wedge from the ACB and restored it's nominal hanging position. Removed the ACB locking bracket screws.

Started stowing all left over bags of "junk" left outside of the chamber door on various table surfaces by SUS and every other team that visited this last month.  If you're missing something (and you noticed), I took ownership of it.

Jim arrived and unlocked the ISI.  The ETMy QUAD will remain locked during dome replacement.

Apollo started gearing up to remove walking plates from upstairs and crane the dome on the chamber.

 

Tomorrow's to-do list which Margot and I will do until the last step:

Inspect insides of viewports.

Adjust ACB to check magnet gap which may or may not have shifted slightly due to the swing back from today.

Clean the chamber, vacuum, etc.

Take final PCL swipes.

Blow various other optic surfaces.  Or not.

Swap in final 1" witness optic on QUAD structure.

Check/Remove all tools.

Remove ETMy-HR with N2 blow.

Set and lock all 64 QUAD EQ stops and nuts, accounting for buoyancy.

Set QUAD BOSEMs to account for buoyancy.

Quick QUAD health check with DTT TFs.

Lay final witness plates.

Exit chamber.

Finish stowing everything around door and move it out of the way.

Put door on.

Comments related to this report
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - 20:10, Thursday 27 March 2014 (11050)

So, when we went to swing back the ACB and stuff the wedge into place, the wedge could not be inserted in the gap all of the way due to interference with the round balance weight attached on top of the baffle.  We pushed the wedge in ~2/3 of the way which gave us ~2/3 more working area than we had with out swinging it back at all.  Good enough.  (Removing the round weight would have cause the balance of the ACB to be out of alignment so that wasn't an option.)  Also, even though the locking bracket was engaded which provided some support to the down tube of the ACB, the ACB was still a bit "rickety" during this maneuver.

betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - 18:38, Friday 28 March 2014 (11079)

The first picture below is of the ACB wedge not quite installed as far in as it could.  This meant that the screw holes to secure the wedge in place could not be engaged.  ACB engineers must have anticipated this so they provided us with a "safety" chain which one could tie up "somewhere" such that the wedge doesn't come flying out at you if you bump the baffle while it's up.  The chain was of limited length, so they best Margot and I could do was wind it around the post loosely a few times.  Note, the wedge seemed wedged in well enough that it didn't budge when we did happen to bump the baffle a bit here and there with the cone work.

 

Also note, the ACB did not hang the same way after we restored it.  Mitchell had to make some minor tweeks to the balance today in order to recover the correct gap setting for the magnets (specifically 0.09 inches! - Really?  Not 0.08" or 0.1", but 0.09", huh!?  Seems a bit tight given the grossness of both the swing back application and the shear size of the baffle... but what do I in SUS know.)  In the end, as usual the ACB comes with in a few mm of the QUAD structure at the head of one of it's screws (see 2nd picture with red circle around it).

Images attached to this comment
H1 SEI
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:47, Thursday 27 March 2014 - last comment - 10:49, Friday 28 March 2014(11039)
New Seismic untrip instructions

Here is an update on the instruction for untripping seismic, with some new tips from Fabrice, especially for ETMX. 

Untrip HEPI WD, use Commands2 window to isolate level 1 on all chambers except BS which is level2

Untrip ISI WD (you may need to raise T240 Threshold)

reset CPS offsets,

Check that everything is in high gain: (this is also good to check if you are already isolated but have a lot of motion)

If you have been struggling with switching the blend filters, you may want to zero the T240s.  You can do this in the three T240 screens by tuning on the AutoZ filter module in the X filter module, then turning it off.  

Use commands, isolate level 3 for most chambers. For ETMX start with Commands, Isolate Stage 1 Level 2.  Once this script is finished, isolate stage 2 level 3.  

Switch Blends:

good luck...

Comments related to this report
fabrice.matichard@LIGO.ORG - 19:01, Thursday 27 March 2014 (11048)

We just tried again. The following sequence seems robust for ETMX:

 

a) Isolate Stage 1 Level 2

b) Isolate Stage 2 Level 3

c) Swith Stage 2 to TCrappy (Using Switch All)

d) Swith Stage 1 to TCrappy (Using Switch All)

 

We are working on the Guardian to simplify all of this. It will handle all the parameters and sequences specific to each chamber (controls level, blend filters, alignement dofs to be restored...)

hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - 07:59, Friday 28 March 2014 (11052)

If you have been struggling with switching the blend filters, you may want to zero the T240s.  You can do this in the three T240 screens by tuning on the AutoZ filter module in the X filter module, then turning it off.

It is my understanding that you should NOT zero the T240, certainly not just to try it.  In a new installatioin or the T240 is suspected of being out of level, then one should look at the U V W signals and AutoZ if they are not close to zero once the machine has stabilized. Before I was told this, it was my experience that pressing the AutoZ did NOT speed up the Trillium settleing process.  Rich Mittleman--please weigh in here.

brian.lantz@LIGO.ORG - 09:37, Friday 28 March 2014 (11055)
I agree with Hugh that re-zeroing the T240 should not be done while the T240 is in the midst of settling from a large dynamic shift. The re-zeroing is used to reset the mass-center of the instrument. This can shift with temperature or DC level changes. One should be sure the instrument has fully stabilized, otherwise you run the risk of 'recentering' to some off-center location.
the Manufacture's (Nanometrics) instuctions can be found in section 2.4.2 of the T240 OBS manual (1). 
https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-T0900323  (2)
-Brian


(1) OBS - Ocean Bottom Seismometer. we use this because it is smaller, and we provide our own pressure vessel.
(2) yes, we have received permission to put a copy in the DCC.

sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 10:49, Friday 28 March 2014 (11056)

Thank you for clarifying...

Fabrice asks that we also add a step at the begining of the procedure where we plot the WD trip, zoom in and post it in the alog.  Hopefully this we result in seismic people analyzing them and figuring out why we have so many trips. 

This is important because our current rate of trips (and the time it takes to recover from them) will be a serious impediment to commsioning once we need to use 7 chambers all at the same time. 

H1 AOS
thomas.vo@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:37, Thursday 27 March 2014 - last comment - 08:24, Friday 28 March 2014(11047)
TCS CO2-X Laser Install
Aidan, Dave H, Thomas

More cabling and plumbing.  The leaky laser from ALOG 11019 was replaced with a new one and a matching RF driver. We're in a position to be able to turn on the laser mid-morning tomorrow.
Comments related to this report
aidan.brooks@LIGO.ORG - 08:24, Friday 28 March 2014 (11053)

Images attached to this comment
H1 SUS
travis.sadecki@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:32, Thursday 27 March 2014 - last comment - 09:19, Friday 04 April 2014(11044)
ITMx Monolithic Welding

The new ITMx monolithic welding has been successfully completed and was left suspended overnight last night.  The majority of the modal measurements have also been completed today, with the exception of the violin modes, which are proving to be trickier to measure than in previous suspensions.  We will continue with these measurements tomorrow with some different equipment.  Stay tuned for subsequent posts with IAS and modal measurement numbers.

Comments related to this report
angus.bell@LIGO.ORG - 12:28, Friday 28 March 2014 (11062)
Modal frequencies of the test mass (ITMX) with the PUM nominally locked are:

ITMX				
          value	resolution		
Pendulum   0.649	0.002						
Pitch	   1.1153	0.002		
Yaw	   1.0928	0.002		
Bounce	   6.74 	0.016		
Roll	   9.195	0.016		

Violin modes				fibre serial number
BR	   499.9	0.06		S1400155
BL	   501.2	0.06		S1400156
FR	   500.8	0.06		S1400138
FL	   502.2	0.06		S1400153

[just as a note to self as much as anything - remember to use the Uniform window on the spectrum analyser for the violin modes when using the chirped sweep output]
Non-image files attached to this comment
jason.oberling@LIGO.ORG - 09:19, Friday 04 April 2014 (11171)

Forgot to post this last week.  Final alignment numbers from the ITMx welding (all directions/rotations reported from the view of the IAS equipment, i.e. looking at the HR face of the ITMx):

  • Pitch
    • PUM: 10 µrad down
    • ITMx: 2.12 mrad down
    • Differential: 2.11 mrad down
      • The pitch of the ITMx in chamber is 619 µrad down, so we align the ITMx for the welding at this pitch.  Since we are targeting a differential pitch of 619 µrad down, we only missed our target by 1.49 mrad, which puts us within the 2.0 mrad differential pitch spec
    • Differential Spec: 2.0 mrad
  • Roll
    • PUM: ±0.05 mm CW
    • ITMx: ±0.25 mm CW
    • Differential: ±0.2 mm CW
  • Center of Mass Separation
    • Left: 601.3 mm
    • Right: 601.7 mm
    • Target (for both sides): 602.0 mm
Displaying reports 75301-75320 of 86036.Go to page Start 3762 3763 3764 3765 3766 3767 3768 3769 3770 End