I believe the ITMX optical lever signals are calibrated in urad. If that's the case, the ITMX PIT motion right now is 0.3 urad RMS  (this is with the ISI in the configuration Rich left it in).

All the RMS comes from 0.1 - 0.7 Hz and I see 1 urad / sqrt(Hz) @ 0.5 Hz. 

This is significantly worse than ETMY/ITMY motion during the one arm test (0.2 urad/ sqrt(Hz) and 0.3 urad / sqrt(Hz) @ 0.5 Hz T1200450), and normal operations at LLO (0.4 urad RMS, and 0.05 urad/ sqrt(Hz) at 0.5 Hz - LLO log 8637).

Need to double check that I am comparing apples to apples.

Have(had) both ISIs running, RichM took over on the BS.  Have both running at lvl3 with blends of T100mHz.44NO on X & Y and T250 elsewhere on stage1. 250mHz on Stage2.  Decided to try the T40mHz.44NOs on ITMy and they work.  They aren't available on the BS now but with them on on the ITMY there is more lower band green on the BLRMS.  Toggled the Stage2 blend to a fro 750 vs 250 mHz and at the cost of some higher frequencies, the lower bands on the stage2 are greener with higher blend.  Maybe due to the blending bump?

Sheila, Paul

We restarted the PSL after the power watchdog tripped.  (to do this we transitioned the enclosure to science mode).  After the laser had been on for about 15 minutes I thought it would be OK to try to align the ref cav (the trans power had dropped to 0.75 V in the last few days).  
Before the AOM we had 31mW,( measured with the filter in) 30.5 after the first pass, and 18.6 after the second pass.  (60% double pass diffraction efficiency).  I tried to improve this my adjusting the alignment of the retroreflecting mirror, but wasn't able to get any better, and the final alignment had about 17.6 mW after the second pass (57% double pass eifficency).  Tuning up the alignment into the cavity we got the trans PD up to 0.94V, but after I transitioned back to science mode the trans power dropped to 0.86V.  

About 1435pst, the BS V2 HEPI Actuator was put back into run mode with a new, no leak, Parker Valve.  I see no jostle on the pressure trends so the other HEPIs are likely very minimally effected.

Valve L071 was replaced by L170.

When I look at the trends I see that the BS position sensor loops have been off quite a bit over the past many days.  Remember the RX & RY will not move to their targets if greater than 500 nrads; so, please check if your alignment seems iffy. 

See the attached, notice that for most of this 30 day plot the trends are very flat, this is the position loops holding location.  Notice though that over about the last ten days, RX & RY spend more time than the other dofs at a different location aand not trending perfectly flat, evidence that the HEPI 'free' position is too far from the target and it won't load the target for those dofs.

Kate G., Mitch R., Filiberto C., & Jeff B.

   Mitch and Jeff installed the HSTS and TCS SRS cables to the in-vacuum feed through and ran them up to the ISI table. Kate and Jeff checked for grounds in the suspension quadro-puss cables which are routed through the suspension Weldment. Filiberto and Jeff checked for grounds on the in-air cables from the satellite box to the OSEMs. There are no grounds in the H1-SR2 cabling at this time.
 
   The top two cables (for the M1 level) are reversed at either the feed through or the Table Cable Bracket. I will check and correct this mis-connection in the morning.       

Rick, Sheila,

at 00:16 the PSL turned off. Rick and Sheila think the power watchdog may have tripped. Sheila has started the recovery procedure.

Betsy, Travis, Jason

Today, we finished tuning the 12 DOFs of the ETMy QUAD.  We had to take some time evaluating the gap laser measurement system as it turns out that it is very sensitive to it's own level.  In the end, all 12 DOFs are within tolerance.  All lower stage OSEMs are aligned and looking at 50% OLV flag/sensor positions after we played a few rounds of the alignment game with them.  Note, there is some differential roll between the main and reaction chains which made aligning the lower stage OSEMs additionally difficult.  This is likely because there is some wire segment at the wrong length or some mass assymetry somewhere - it has been like this since the y-arm OAT as an H2 suspension, so we are just hoping for clean TFs again.  It is very invasive and time consuming to swap wire segments at this point so we'll just see what the TFs show in the morning*.  Arnaud has started running TFs now.

It is now using the channels in /ligo/lho/data/conlog/h1/target_grep_channel_list.txt (attached). There are 97,345 channels in this file. They are all monitored!

9:00      PSL Check List done
9:05-10:24 Going to End X to check QPD amplifier chassis - Filiberto
9:47-11:00 Checking SIS cables (HAM4 LVEA) – Jeff B./Mitchell
9:50-10:15 Vendor delivery on Site (water)
10:15      CDs work (installed a new version of gds and changed default NDS    server to h1nds0)- James
10:40-     Praxiar LN2 delivery to CP1
11:15-12:15 Installing SR2 cable bracket (HAM4 LVEA)- Jeff B.
12:08      Re-starting ETMX/ITMX models – Arnaud
13:10-15:55Working on ACB in LVEA West Bay – Mitchell/Scott
13:30-14:56 SR2 cable testing (HAM4 LVEA) – Jeff B.
14:10      DAQ restart – Dave
14:20-15:58Computer work at End X – Cyrus
14:30-14:46 Back to BSC2 HEPI (Putting actuator back to “Run mode”)-Hugh
15:45      Transitioning End Y to Laser Safe 
15:56      Back from End Y – Betsy/Travis

Late entry: at 14:10 I restarted the DAQ to resync with the new SUS ITMX ETMX ini files. I also added the latest Beckhoff ini files Daniel created today.

Attached are the weak heating curves from tonight.

Ring heater turned on: 09:13:39 UTC  (2014/02/04), with a POP18 of about 4050cts
Lensing maximum occurs at 11:31 with an error of about +-5min , with a POP18 of about 7850cts

I.e. the turn-on to peak-lensing time interval is 2h:28min, or about 8880sec.

For later reference, the POP18, 33min into the run was about 4450cts


We will leave the heater on today (at 1.5Watt total) to the long-term equilibrium lensing. From that we can establish the time during initial heating which has the same lensing as the long-term equilibrium. This will allow us to simplify setting the power.

See also alogs
https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=9778
https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=9736

As reference, in alog 9736 we had
Start heating 08:09 UTC and 3500 cts PP18 build-up
Ideal matching at 08:42 UTC, with 11500cts POP18 build-up.
That's 0h33min into the run (1980sec). That was with 20W total.


Based on these numbers I would expect a heating power of 1.5

Work Completed

Looked at the QPD Transimpedance Amplifier units at EX, S1102832 and S1102821.  We wanted to confirm the board versions. All boards D1001974 are version 2 and have the following configuration:
- C15 is removed
- R15 is 0 ohms
- JP1 has a jumper installed

Filiberto Clara

While searching for a flash of IR in TMSX IR QPDs, TR_B looked like it has a very slow low pass filter (attached).

The difference between TR_A and TR_B in the digital world is that the dewhitening (40:0.4) for the fixed whitening is off for TR_A and on for TR_B.

So it seems as if these IR QPDs are without fixed (non-switchable) whitening, but we're supposed to have these.

Later Filiberto will go to EX, open the chassis and change the jumper to get the whitening back.