Attached are plots of dust counts > .3 microns and > .5 microns in particles per cubic foot requested from 5 PM March 28 to 5 PM March 29. Also attached are plots of the modes to show when they were running/acquiring data. Data was taken from h1nds1. T0=13-03-29-00-00-00; Length=86400 (s) 1440.0 minutes of trend displayed
Summary:
When we tested the in-vac picomotors on HAM3 again though these picomotors and also in-vac QPDs were tested OK before (here's the alog of these tests done by me, Cheryl and Daniel), nothing moved. Without these things, HIFO test never works.
The problem was traced back to an error in in-vac cabling. ISC IR QPDs were connected to the picomotor feedthrough and vice versa though I have no idea why this happened (see the comments attached to this entry for details).
The cabling was fixed and the picomotors now work again, but ISC QPDs are likely broken because of multiple attempts to drive picomotors back and forth, which put more than 100V on diodes. We used laser pointer to test the QPDs with the handheld QPD interface but were never able to convince ourselves that they're working. We forgot to test if any of the quadrants are short-circuited.
IO QPD for MC transmission should be OK as it is on a separate cable.
Anyway, we have spare QPDs and we'll replace them on Monday, entering HAM3 from the north opening. It's probably less than 2 hours for replacing, plus an hour for testing. We've done the same thing in EY and we know how to do this.
Spare S/N 20 and 24 from our stock of IR QPDs were bagged and left in a clean room by HAM2 so we can continue on Monday morning.
Picomotors and ISC QPDs both have two in-vac cable sections. The first section is routed to cable bracket 3 (CB3), then the second section goes from CB3 to the vacuum feedthrough, and apparently the second sections were crossed and mixed up.
Before we fixed the error:
Cable Assembly | CB3 position | Cable | feedthrough |
Picomotor D1101516/S1105245 | 2nd floor | HAM3 ISC QPD cable D1101658 / S1105085 | D3-3C2 |
ISC QPD D1101624 / cannot read S/N | 1st floor | HAM3 picomotor cable D1101659/S1105100 | D3-3C1 |
After the problem was fixed (everything is consistent with D1101463 and D1002874):
Cable Assembly | CB3 position | Cable | feedthrough |
Picomotor D1101516/S1105245 | 2nd floor | HAM3 picomotor cable D1101659/S1105100 | D3-3C1 |
ISC QPD D1101624 / cannot read S/N | 1st floor | HAM3 ISC QPD cable D1101658 / S1105085 | D3-3C2 |
Other things to note:
1. What happened?
It's really baffling as everything worked last September as I noted above.
Either things were mixed up from the start and somehow I managed to connect the test equipments (the picomotor driver and the QPD tester) to feedthroughs in a consistently wrong manner so everything worked, or things were OK back then but mixed up later for whatever reason.
Thing is, I remember having looked at D1002874 (Flange Layout H1 HAM3) and D1101463 (Cable routing configuration HAM 3) multiple times, especially former, before connecting the picomotor driver on the feedthrough exactly because I was worried to break QPDs (after all, this is not the first time we broke QPD, see this alog). It's extremely unlikely that what I did at that time was inconsistent with D1002874.
2. Picomotor driver unit 3 is funny.
During the testing, we disconnected the in-air cable from the picomotor controller for HAM1/3 (unit 3) and connected a picomotor directly to the front panel. It drove the picomotor, but it was VERY quiet and slow even though we selected the fastest pulse rate (500Hz) from the MEDM screen. No screeching at all.
We did the same test for the driver unit 4 that is used for ICST1/IOT2 and it was acting properly.
We never bothered to swap the Beckhoff cables of these units to see if it's a software problem or the drivers.
Anyway, if it turns out to be the driver, we'll swap it with the test unit that is sitting on the cart in the LVEA.
Here is a picture of the actual cable bracket. This was taken after we had fixed the cabling.
Richard cleaned the fiber this morning at the Y end patch panel, and after that we had 18-19uW at the table feed-through and I measured 14uW with the power meter in air on the table. After realigning for the swapped beamsplitter, (and re-aligning the power monitor PD) the beatnote was -38dBm, around -20 dBm after the amplifier. A plot of the OLG will follow, but the main message is that the ALS PLL is working. It has been locked for almost hours now, based on looking at the striptool of the beat frequency and the control signals. The settings are: cg -15, fg 22, common compensation on, slow ugf set to -0.015Hz and slow pole set to 0.0001 Hz. The beatnote frequency has glitches that are not present in the channel for the VCO frequency, where the signal level is much higher. It might be easier to write an autolocker if we could get rid of those glitches, perhaps by amplifying the signal.
Chris, Max, Sheila- Before Richard cleaned the fibers, Chris and I measured the power in the fibers at a few different places: Input to fiber distribution box in R4: 1.2mW Y end output of fiber distribution box: 75 uW Max's polarization box: 60uW Output at Y end patch panel: 10uW At ALS table feedthrough:10uW on ALS table at fiber output-approx 10 uW Also the OLG of the PLL with the settings above is attached.
I changed the ALSLaser library, so that the polarity between the slow loop and fast loop is correct when the ugf setting for the slow loop is positive. Also, when I came in this morning the PLL was still locked and looked like it had been for the last 10 hours.
Today we fine tuned the rotation of the HWP that rotates the polarization of the beam after the IMC. We followed these steps:
- we used an HWP at the bottom of the PSL periscope to set the polarization approximately "wrong", so to have considerable power transmitted through the unlocked IMC
- we used the HWP after IM1 to make sure that a good amount of power would go in the first forward rejected beam
- we rotated IM2 in yaw so that the first forward rejected beam would clear the FI and be transmitted all the way to (almost) IM4
- we position a power meter there
- we removed the HWP on HAM2, and rotated the HWP in the PSL so to minimize the power in the forward rejected beam. Because of the absence of the HWP in HAM2, this beam contained the "good" polarization: this way we made sure that the polarization off the PSL was as bad as possible.
- we steered IM2 back in its original position, and we placed the power meter in the main beam
- we re-inserted the HWP in HAM2 and optimized it to minimize the power in the main beam, thus rotating the polarization coming out from the IMC by 90 deg, that is what we want.
Unfortunately, during this process we had the opportunity to compare the beam out of the IMC with the re-routed IMC_REFL beam that had been setup couple of weeks ago and used since then as a more powerful reference for alignment. What we discovered is that the beams are not well aligned (more than a beam diameter at the FI). Note that:
The good news is that the situation can probably be easily recovered, without moving other components, using IM1 and IM2 to make sure that the current IMC beam is aligned, at the FI and further downstream, to the reference we have been using up to now. If the offsets turn out to be big, we may need to relieve them.
This morning I started floating the BS ISI, after asking SUSsers to lock their optic up. No real problems, beyond a missing wrench that had to be retrieved from staging and a CDS laptop that had too aggressive power saving settings (it would sleep the monitor after 1 minute, enough time to change out gloves...sigh). The ISI is currently floating within spec, cps were regapped where necessary, lockers were adjusted, the actuators were visually inspected for spacing, and cables were surveyed for rubbing. This should mean BSC2 is in a good position for in-chamber testing, but the BS is still locked.
- Mark L, and group changed pre-filters for AHU 1 and 2, per WP 3783.
- LVEA transition to laser safe at 9:00 am.
- Corey G. work in the squeezer area, East Bay of LVEA.
- Rick S, Michael R, and others to visit MID-Y, inventory of 3rd IFO PSL items.
- Jim W work at BSC2, top area.
- Betsy W and Filiberto C, work at HAM2, mission aborted.
- Betsy W and Travis S, BS is locked now.
- LVEA transition to laser hazard for IO work.
- IO group work, PSL enclosure --> HAM02.
- LVEA transition to laser safe, 3:32 pm.
After two rounds of transfer functions two nights ago and yesterday night (aLog 5907 and 5920) the beamsplitter look(ed) fully supsended (it had to be locked again this morning)
The attached pdfs show
Yesterday we continued to struggle to get light from the fiber to the end station. Richard is helping us trace down the problem. Even with the fiber working well, we only get 10uW onto the ALS table, then there are two 50/50 beam splitters, so there were only about 2.5 uW on the PD, giving us a signal level around -40dBm, which is marginal and might be why I thought the ohase frequency discriminator was not working (it works as expected with larger signal levels). I changed out the 50/50 beam splitter that sends a pick off to the PDs that monitor the power out of the fiber and the polarization to a 10% beamsplitter. Chris and Max also rerouted the fiber from the patch panel to the table feedthrough. This fiber was on the floor, and probably stepped on, but it seems to work fine, the probelms we are having are upstream of that. Also, I spent some time yesterday afternoon labeling cables inside the ALS table, were there is a suprising number of cables with no labels at all. Most of these cables are also not included in the cable plan, for the cables that go to feedthroughs I've been naming the cable after the cable on the other side of the feedthrough and adding an A to the end of the name. Otherwise I just make a name up.
[Keita, Corey, Kiwamu]
The alignment of the POP paths in HAM3 are done. We removed the green fiber laser.
The next step is a picomotor test at HAM3 with the Beckoff system.
Forward propagating POP
The POP path behind PR2 for the forward propagating beam (going from PRM to PR2) were successfully adjusted within a precision of ~ 1 mm or less at the QPDs. Comparing the alignment precision with the QPD diameter of 3 mm, we conclude that our alignment is good enough. This time the issue of the transparent BS [1] was mitigated by fully opening the aperture of the irises to make the HR beam as bright as possible. Luckily the HR beam became visible enough to work with. We tweaked the two steering mirrors to get the beam aligned on the QPD sled.
Actually we repeated this alignment twice. After the first round it turned out that the first steering mirror (a 3" mirror) which we established its alignment yesterday [2] gave a beam too low for the other POP path (i.e. backward POP path). The first steering mirror is relatively tall by design because it needs to be at the same height as the PRs and therefore the beam reflected by this mirror has to be angled downward such that the beam height gets lowered to the standard height of 4". Yesterday we adjusted the angle such that only the forward beam hits the center of its second mirror but apparently this wasn't a great idea. It resulted in such a low beam in the backward path due to the fact the backward beam propagates a longer distance than that of the forward beam by 6-ish inches. This too-low-beam was found after we removed the green laser setup at HAM2. Therefore we had to setup the green laser again and repeated the same alignment process. We adjusted the first mirror such that the beam is a bit too high for the forward path by 5-ish mm and a bit too low for the backward path by the same amount.
Backward propagating POP
The backward propagating POP beam behind PR2 was aligned using the green fiber laser and we confirmed that the beam got through to HAM1. The same fiber laser was used to simulate the backward path. The laser was set up at HAM3 and injected at the front of PR2. We let the reflection go through the two irises. The position of the second steering mirror (2" reflector) was intentionally displaced toward east by ~ 7 mm in order to keep a large clearance for the downstream beam which passes by the west side of the mirror. Hence the beam spot on this mirror is also off by the same amount which shouldn't be a problem because the mirror is large enough and also the incident angle is small (about 10 deg ?). Although the green beam diverges a lot when it arrives at HAM2 we aligned the beam such that it passes by any of the towers in HAM2 with the same amount of the clearance. This resulted in a beam off-centered at the viewport in between HAM2 and HAM1 but this is OK. Some alignment of the optics at HAM1 will be performed later.
BS wedge on POP QPD sled
This is a minor issue and we write this simply as a record here. We found that the BS on the POP QPD sled had its wedge at a wrong side. Ideally we want the fat side to be at the QPD side to let the ghost beam diverge away, but it seems we placed the BS in the opposite way --- skinny side at the QPD side. We checked the engrave mark on the barrel of the BS and found a "W" mark at the far side from the QPD, indicating that the fat side is at the far side and this is wrong. We are not going to fix this as the ghost beam will not hit the QPD anyway since the QPD is close to the BS.
[1] LHO alog 5774 "50-50 IR beam splitter is a good AR for green"
[2] LHO alog 5911 "Alignment of POP QPD path : ongoing"
3" mirror centering:
Ideally the line bisecting the angle of forward and backward going beam is at the center of 3" mirror, which means that the forward going beam is about 9mm to the west from the center and the backward beam 9mm to the east.
We didn't pursue this really strictly. All in all everything is probably 3 or 4mm too much to the west, but I didn't see any problem in that.
POP/ASL septum window between HAM1 and HAM2
The septum window is partly occulted by MC3, MC1 and PMMT2 cages. We aligned things such that the possibility of clipping is minimized. However, see the next point.
Beam position at PR3:
With the current PR2 alignment biases, the forward going green beam didn't hit the center of PR3. It's between 1 and 2 inches too high and to the west. (The beam then bounces off of PR3 and comes back to HAM2 and seems to go toward BS.)
That means that the PR2 angle is a few mrad off both in PIT and YAW as of now (but the beam position on PR2 is very good), and the same error is there for our back-propagating green beam. Once things are nicely aligned, the backward beam will probably be clipped by one of the SUS cages or the edge of the septum window.
That's not a serious problem, the beam will not be clipped by the steering mirrors in HAM3, and HAM1 will be in air anyway, so we can always steer things back to a good position.
- Joe, Giacomo, Cheryl - Filiberto started the process to attach pins/connector to FI HWP pico motor. Lack of information about the connector convinced us to push this out to at least tomorrow. - the half wave plate was re-installed in the IMC trans beam path after IM1. The beam through the FI was misaligned with IM2 to give an unclipped Forward Rejected Beam to minimize, which was minimized to around 40 uW of power. - IOT2R was moved into place today, on the East side of HAM2, beams were aligned onto the single periscope and onto the table. The table position needs to be marked before moving the table. - beams transmitted through IM4 were measured - some measurements will be used to compare expected and actual transmittance of 2" fixed optics. Actual power readings to be attached. - AOE1 was aligned downstream of HWP per Rodica's instructions to move it along the beam path by 20mm. With HA1 at 0, the front of the HWP is at 25mm , and the front plate of AOE1 is at 95mm along the beam path. - PR2 scrapper baffle was installed. Joe did the install, and centered the baffle w.r.t the PR2 optic, since the beam at HAM3 iris was about a beam radius off in yaw, and off in pitch. Earlier work of adding the HWP back into the beam path is the likely source of the change seen at PR2. Using IM2, we deturmined that the correction was 100 slider counts or less, i.e. small. Friday: Plan is to flash the IMC, though there have been rumors of locking it in air...
Tried to connect/crimp the pins and connector for the Faraday Isolator. After going inside the chamber, noticed that the other connector that mates with the one I was installing is the same gender. We received a female connector and socket pins, but need male connector and pins. Have contacted Rich Abbot at CIT regarding getting correct parts. Filiberto Clara
This are the power measurements we took on HAM to estimate the transmissivity of a number of optics. Measurement taken with filter inf ront of the sensr are specified (to account account for possible miscalibrations).
Incident on IM1 (filter on): 189 mW
Transmitted through IM1 (filter on): 6.25 mW
Transmitted through IM1 (filter on): 5.96 mW
NOTE: we did not realize that, because we were using the rerouted REFL beam, the polarization of the incident beam on IM1 was not as expected during operation. So this set of measruement is probably of (very) limited usefulness and will ned to be retaken. This does not apply to the following measurement taken at and after IM4, as only the right polarization remains in the main beam after the FI.
Forward incident on IM4 (filter on): 176 mW
Forward transmitted trough IM4 (filter on): .39 mW
Forward transmitted through IM4: 385 uW
Forward transmitted through ROM LH1: 30.5 uW
Forward reflected of ROM LH1: 361 uW
Forward incident on ROM RH3: 355 uW
Forward reflected of ROM RH4: 325 uW
Forward transmitted through ROM RH4: 25 uW
Forward reflected off IM4 (filter on): 175 mW
Forward transmitted through PRM (filter on): 5.4 mW
Backward transmitted through IM4: 380 uW
Based on the the above measurements, we can estimate the following transmissivities. Values in grey are calculated, not measured.
Incident | Transmitted | Reflected | Sum | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IM4 Forward | 176 | .39 | 0.22% | 175 | 99.43% | 175.39 | 99.65% |
ROM LH1 | .385 | .0305 | 7.92% | 0.361 | 93.77% | 0.3915 | 101.69% |
ROM RH4 | .355 | .025 | 7.04% | 0.325 | 91.55% | 0.35 | 98.59% |
PRM | 175 | 5.4 | 3.09% | 169.6 | 96.91% | 175 | 100.00% |
IM4 Backwards | 169.6 | .038 | 0.22% |
Attached are plots of dust counts > .3 microns and > .5 microns in particles per cubic foot requested from 5 PM March 27 to 5 PM March 28. Also attached are plots of the modes to show when they were running/acquiring data. Data was taken from h1nds1. T0=13-03-28-00-00-00; Length=86400 (s) 1440.0 minutes of trend displayed
Starting a round of transfer functions overnight on the beamsplitter.
see aLog 5927 for summary
Starting a round of matlab transfer functions overnight for the beamsplitter.
see aLog 5927 for summary
Before the power outage of next week, new h1sus${mc1/mc2/mc3/prm/pr2/pr3}safe.snap files have been saved in /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/sus/h1/burtfiles.
It includes alignment offsets with the right values from aLog 5851 for PR3/PR2 and 5825 for MC1/MC2/MC3. It also includes the ODC recent update aLog 5809
The safe state has been defined as the following :
**alignment offsets off
**damping filters on
**master switch off
The snap files have been commited in the svn repository.