Attached are the WhiteNoise transfer function measurements taken on 07/30/2012 on the HSTS metal build slated for becoming "PR2" in-chamber. Coherence is excellent for all DoFs and resonances clearly visible. A comparison of this data with data from the staging building build and the model will be posted.
From 17:30h to 18:36h (local time) the Cavity has been locking nice and steady, until it suddenly nose dived. Not sure why, the green power monitor increased maybe making the locking loop unstable (to much gain? haven't measured the UGF after the SHG temp mods).
I was trying to measure the TF from HEPI to the cavity error signal and the CPS. After about 30min I realised that there is no signal comming from the RFM into HEPI! HEPI looks at the same RFM locaiton as the ETM (H2:ISCEY-SUSETMY_LONG). I check in both models (h2susetmy and h2 hpietmy) which seem to be ok. I think Dave did some cleaning up on the weekend, will ask him tomorrow.
Attached plot shows a reference from last week, and a spectrum during the hour lock.
The 'ISI Low Blend (ITM+ETM)' is with a cross over frequency of 250 mHz on both stages (ITM/ETM). Currently the ISI runs with blend frequencies at 750 mHz for both stages, except in X and Y (cavity axis) as indicated in the legend. The peaking at the 2.75 Hz is less, although an increase at the higer frequencies.
Filiberto, Richard, Corey, Hugh, Hugo,
Today's effort brought us to the point where we are able to run transfer functions:
Transfer Functions are running overnight. They should be done by 6am.
Note: There is a mailing list to receive the alerts regarding these transfer functions. Please let me know if you would like your email address to be added to it.
The computer overnight TFs were running on froze (black screen) around 11.30pm. I was able to retrieve the TF sections measured until then.
TFs were compared to the ones measured on LLO HAM3. Accordance regarding result on CPSs is good (plots attached).
Results on GS13s appeared filtered differently than LLO and need to be analyzed in more details.
GS13s were tested. Their spectra taken with when the ISI is tilted (most critical configuration for GS13s) show that they work properly (see attached plots).
LLO-HAM3 Transfer Functions used for the comparison plots (CPS-H, CPS-V) were recorded in-chamber, in-air, on January 18th 2012. These transfer functions are the one presented in LLO-HAM3 phase II testing report under the section 2.2.1 of the initial chamber testing chapter.
This afternoon at about 5.15pm the alarm handler went off for this channel: H0:FMC-MY_CY_H20_SUP_DEGF
I'm not sure what it refers to, but I plotted the trend for the past 2 days and it doesn't seem to be doing anything particularly unusual.
I aknowledged the alarm.
Bubba and crew craning at End-Y. Done by 9:30. Maggie to End-Y Corey at HAM3 for SEI cabling Alex and others to End-Y to power a microphone Eric A. - installing HEPI valve plates 12:45 - Hanford call testing sirens Craning and work with cabling inside HAM3 for Seismic
Common mode board A at H2 EY (S/N S1102638) (Jax S., Daniel S.) We changed the common generic filter to a double pole 100kHz/Q=0.85. This is to replace the Pomona box that was used to suppress the PZT resonance around 250kHz-300kHz. R129 -> 2.67K R130 -> 1.30K R131 -> 0 R132 -> 0 C207 -> 1.5n C206 -> 470p This allowed us to push the ugf to just above 30kHz with a phase margin of 45 degrees. We backed off with the gain set to -6dB in the input section which leaves us with a ugf around 28kHz and a phase margin of close to 50 degrees. Common mode board B at H2 EY (S/N S1102637) We also changed the fast monitor into the Beckhoff on the cavity locking servo to be unity gain rather than 10. R271 -> 0 R272 -> NL
As I mentioned on Friday, I noticed a coherent shift of the HEPI platform on HAM3 as I was locking it up in preparation for ISI measurements. Hugo gave me a window this morning so I unlocked the HEPI again and very thoroughly looked for interferences that might be pushing it out of our aligned location. I could find no non-suspended elements touching suspended portions aside from a few of the temporarily run in-air cables. I can't imagine that these contacts could pull the system around. Once it was all released I pushed on the crossbeams to 'see' knocking. I could not detect anything that looked like something running into something else but I did notice that the vertical moved fairly easily whereas horizontal motion was very stiff. I'm trying to understand why this would be but nothing is so far revealed. Thoughts? For the record, based on the dial indicators, I see a CCW rotation of about 250urad caused by a shift to the east of the south side of about 0.5mm.
Maybe when I push up and down, I only need to move the local corner up & down or maybe the local and the opposite corner. Whereas when I attempt to move it horizontally, I have to move maybe three or even four corners of the stiff system and hence the greater difficulty.
Issue with watchdog tripped - Richard, Filiberto, Hugo
Corrected, can now actuate
We managed un-tripping the coil driver chassis bio watchdog of HAM3 by:
In Vacuum cabling - Corey, Hugo
CPS H3 and CPS V3 were swapped - corrected
I took spectra on our sensors this morning and noticed H3 and V3 were swapped. Corey went looking at it and located it on the in-vaccum side of the feedthrough.
The binary word that should be used for HAM3, in ISI_CUST_CHAMBER_BIO.adl is:
65535
Replaced ISI Coil Driver SN S1103567 with SN S1103321 in Rack H1-SEI-C2 for HAM3 . Driver seems to have internal wiring issues with the outputs. When you drive CH1 (coarse1), it would drive CH4 (coarse 2). Same with CH2 (fine1) and CH3 (fine2). Unit also has a ±18V type connector for the input power of ±24V. Filiberto Clara
Using the PT-410B vacuum gauge, we looked at the pressure in End-Y volume since its pumpdown began in early June 2012 (see attached plot). The first ~10 days is before the gate-valve that opens to the cryo pump was opened. Opening to the cryo pump reduced the pressure by a factor of 10. The start time for the plot (i.e., the offset that we subtracted from the time stamp) was adjusted (at the 0.1 day level) by hand so that the pre-GV opening segment was a striaight line in the log-log plot.
The two black lines are by-eye fits to the pumpdown curves. The slope of the first segment is 1/t^{0.68}; since the GV opening, the pumpdown is a little faster, at 1/t^{0.88}.
(Matt E, Peter F)
As part of gearing up for aLIGO CW and Stochastic analysis detector characterization, a number of us are developing and starting to use new or enhanced spectral line finding tools. We plan to apply these various tools to this summer's OAT data in the hope of 1) making the tools better via exposure to real data; 2) identifying spectral lines early on that can be mitigated; and 3) cataloging lines that we have to live with in aLIGO. A wiki clearinghouse for OAT spectral line studies can be found here. For now it has mostly documentation on tools and channel selections, but over time it will be populated with study results. One important tool is an enhanced version of the familiar Fscan program. Greg Mendell has started creating daily Fscan plots for locked-arm data (defined by the mean value of H2:ISC-ALS_EY_REFL_PWR_MON_OUT16 over 1 minute lying in the range 4300-8000 -- see wiki above for explanation). The Fscans generated so far cover only the days of July 16 and 20, chosen because each had more than five hours of locked-arm data. I have used the half-hour SFTs generated during the Fscanning to look at average spectra for the calibrated OAT feedback channel H2:SUS-ETMY_M0_LOCK_L_IN1_DQ for July 16 (5 hours) and July 20 (9 hours) with 0.56 mHz binning. Two different averages were computed, one being a simple arithmetic average, the other a noise weighted average that is almost, but not quite the same as a harmonic mean. (The same method was used to compute unweighted and weighted averages for h(t) for all of S5 and S6, as discussed in more detail here.) Generally speaking, one expects the weighted average to be lower than the unweighted average and to have a smaller variance. Large differences between unweighted and weighted averages indicate non-stationary bands. The figures below show the results:Some quick observations:
- Full spectrum (0-1000 Hz) for July 16 (unweighted and weighted averages)
- Full spectrum (0-1000 Hz) for July 20 (unweighted and weighted averages)
- Full spectrum (0-1000 Hz) for July 16 and 20 together (weighted only)
- Zoomed spectrum (0-2 Hz) for July 16 and 20 together (weighted only)
- Zoomed spectrum (2-10 Hz) for July 16 and 20 together (weighted only)
- Zoomed spectrum (10-100 Hz) for July 16 and 20 together (weighted only)
- Zoomed spectrum (100-200 Hz) for July 16 and 20 together (weighted only)
- Zoomed spectrum (200-800 Hz) for July 16 and 20 together (weighted only)
Here is a list of the SFT filenames from July 16. The start times are embedded in the names: H-1_H2_1800SFT_fscanH2_SUS-ETMY_M0_LOCK_L_IN1_DQ-1026518956-1800.sft H-1_H2_1800SFT_fscanH2_SUS-ETMY_M0_LOCK_L_IN1_DQ-1026520756-1800.sft H-1_H2_1800SFT_fscanH2_SUS-ETMY_M0_LOCK_L_IN1_DQ-1026523546-1800.sft H-1_H2_1800SFT_fscanH2_SUS-ETMY_M0_LOCK_L_IN1_DQ-1026525346-1800.sft H-1_H2_1800SFT_fscanH2_SUS-ETMY_M0_LOCK_L_IN1_DQ-1026527146-1800.sft H-1_H2_1800SFT_fscanH2_SUS-ETMY_M0_LOCK_L_IN1_DQ-1026528946-1800.sft H-1_H2_1800SFT_fscanH2_SUS-ETMY_M0_LOCK_L_IN1_DQ-1026530746-1800.sft H-1_H2_1800SFT_fscanH2_SUS-ETMY_M0_LOCK_L_IN1_DQ-1026532546-1800.sft H-1_H2_1800SFT_fscanH2_SUS-ETMY_M0_LOCK_L_IN1_DQ-1026535786-1800.sft H-1_H2_1800SFT_fscanH2_SUS-ETMY_M0_LOCK_L_IN1_DQ-1026538156-1800.sft Here is a list of the SFT filenames from July 20. H-1_H2_1800SFT_fscanH2_SUS-ETMY_M0_LOCK_L_IN1_DQ-1026785686-1800.sft H-1_H2_1800SFT_fscanH2_SUS-ETMY_M0_LOCK_L_IN1_DQ-1026787486-1800.sft H-1_H2_1800SFT_fscanH2_SUS-ETMY_M0_LOCK_L_IN1_DQ-1026789286-1800.sft H-1_H2_1800SFT_fscanH2_SUS-ETMY_M0_LOCK_L_IN1_DQ-1026791086-1800.sft H-1_H2_1800SFT_fscanH2_SUS-ETMY_M0_LOCK_L_IN1_DQ-1026792886-1800.sft H-1_H2_1800SFT_fscanH2_SUS-ETMY_M0_LOCK_L_IN1_DQ-1026794686-1800.sft H-1_H2_1800SFT_fscanH2_SUS-ETMY_M0_LOCK_L_IN1_DQ-1026796486-1800.sft H-1_H2_1800SFT_fscanH2_SUS-ETMY_M0_LOCK_L_IN1_DQ-1026798286-1800.sft H-1_H2_1800SFT_fscanH2_SUS-ETMY_M0_LOCK_L_IN1_DQ-1026803896-1800.sft H-1_H2_1800SFT_fscanH2_SUS-ETMY_M0_LOCK_L_IN1_DQ-1026805696-1800.sft H-1_H2_1800SFT_fscanH2_SUS-ETMY_M0_LOCK_L_IN1_DQ-1026807496-1800.sft H-1_H2_1800SFT_fscanH2_SUS-ETMY_M0_LOCK_L_IN1_DQ-1026809296-1800.sft H-1_H2_1800SFT_fscanH2_SUS-ETMY_M0_LOCK_L_IN1_DQ-1026811096-1800.sft H-1_H2_1800SFT_fscanH2_SUS-ETMY_M0_LOCK_L_IN1_DQ-1026812896-1800.sft H-1_H2_1800SFT_fscanH2_SUS-ETMY_M0_LOCK_L_IN1_DQ-1026814696-1800.sft H-1_H2_1800SFT_fscanH2_SUS-ETMY_M0_LOCK_L_IN1_DQ-1026816496-1800.sft H-1_H2_1800SFT_fscanH2_SUS-ETMY_M0_LOCK_L_IN1_DQ-1026818296-1800.sft
The initial entry included links but did not list the URLs. For future reference, here they are:OAT spectral line wiki page: https://wiki.ligo.org/foswiki/bin/view/DetChar/OneArmTestLineInvestigations
Daily OAT Fscans (SUS channels): https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~pulsar/fscan/H2_OneArm/H2_OneArm_SUS/fscanNavigation.html
Averaged S5/S6 spectra: https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~keithr/spectra/
Bram took a look at the transmitted-light photodiode for the reference cavity in the optics lab (using a spectrum analyzer - no DAQ channel available). He saw strong harmonics of 2.74 Hz and 4.0 Hz. So those lines showing up in the ALS feedback signal are artifacts of the temporary light source being used for the One Arm Test and should not be relevant to future aLIGO running.
see post 3582 for the measurements of the 2.75 Hz and the 4 Hz peaks.
Patrick changed the Beckhoff channel name for the ref cav trans to H2:PSL-FSS_TPD_DC_OUTPUT and restarted the Beckhoff EPICS IOC on h2ecatey. I then added this channel to the H2EDCU_ECATEY.ini slow chans file and restarted the H2 DAQ Friday afternoon. This channel can now be trended from H2 DAQ.
This DAQ restart also picked up new fast INI files for H2SUSETMY, H2SUSITMY, H2ISCEY following work by Jeff K and Bram.