Displaying reports 79441-79460 of 83294.Go to page Start 3969 3970 3971 3972 3973 3974 3975 3976 3977 End
Reports until 16:28, Thursday 23 August 2012
LHO General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:28, Thursday 23 August 2012 (3956)
Ops Shift Summary

Noisy morning work (until noon) & then quiet for OAT afterward.

noon:  quiet time begins!!

H1 PSL
michael.rodruck@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:52, Thursday 23 August 2012 - last comment - 18:39, Thursday 23 August 2012(3960)
PSL running at high power

The high power stage was turned on for faraday isolator work. The PMC and FSS are locked, the ISS is unlocked while work is ongoing in the room.

The ILS had some trouble locking, but after raising the reference level to -1.2V from -1.4V it was able to continuously hold lock. The phase of the PMC LO was moved from 67 to 276. The PMC mode matching lenses were moved to the following positions:

L2

Old position (35W) - 368mm, 10.78mm on vernier

New position (200W) - 310mm, 10.78mm on vernier

L3

Old position (35W) - 738mm, 4.10mm on vernier

New position (200W) - 728mm, 4.10 on vernier

Position was measured on the north edge (towards HAM1) of the lens block that mounted onto the rail.

After correcting for alignment we had 126W transmitted and 30W reflected. I did not try to correct for mode matching losses, I only moved the lenses into their original positions, before we moved them to mode match the 35W laser.

The PMC ref level was changed to 1.22V from 1.11V.

The high power stage will stay on overnight but will be turned off for the weekend. I will take some DBB plots tomorrow and give everything some more time to warm up.

Comments related to this report
michael.rodruck@LIGO.ORG - 17:21, Thursday 23 August 2012 (3967)

One more thing to note

The Florida high power beam dump at the far end of the table, used for IO power control, was not hooked up into the water manifold. We needed another high power dump for the transmitted beam through the faraday, so we hooked up the portable power meter to the water manifold and ran the Florida dump in series with it. This is only a temporary solution, as we will eventually remove the portable power meter.

michael.rodruck@LIGO.ORG - 18:39, Thursday 23 August 2012 (3971)

The PMC heater does not look healthy, and has been going between rails since the transition. I'm not sure what is causing this, but I think it'd be worse to leave the PMC with the heater off so I'm leaving it in this state overnight.

Images attached to this comment
H2 AOS
eleanor.king@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:49, Thursday 23 August 2012 - last comment - 17:33, Thursday 23 August 2012(3958)
Ring Heater turned on for cavity scan

(Jax, Elli)  At 13:59:25 local time (20:59:25 UTC) 630mA was requested from each segement of the ITM. Cavity scans are being recorded.  We'll turn the ITM ring heater off after 3 hours.

Running the ring heater is affecting the alignment of the cavity a lot, I'm having to increase the pitch offset on the ITM by about 25 counts every 2 minutes.  Wavefront sensors are on.

Comments related to this report
eleanor.king@LIGO.ORG - 17:33, Thursday 23 August 2012 (3969)

Ring heater has been swtiched off at 17:31.

H1 PSL
michael.rodruck@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:48, Thursday 23 August 2012 (3955)
PSL plots

35W beam

Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
H1 AOS
lisa.austin@LIGO.ORG - posted 22:29, Wednesday 22 August 2012 (3950)
Mode Cleaner Tube baffle installation into MC2 A and B
We installed the compression rings on both A and B ends of the Mode Cleaner Tube (MC2) between HAM4 and HAM5. We completed assembly of all four of the Viewport Frame sections (2 per baffle). We attempted to attach the frames to the compression ring brackets and had difficulty. Screws were meeting resistance at three locations, one per frame. To prevent galling and particulate generation, we removed three of the four frames from the tube. One frame was successfully installed at MC2 A. The plan is to evaluate the #10-32 screws and tapped holes tomorrow morning.

Lisa C. Austin, Thomas Vo, Nichole Washington and Scott (of Apollo).
Images attached to this report
H1 IOO
giacomo.ciani@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:52, Wednesday 22 August 2012 - last comment - 11:01, Tuesday 28 August 2012(3952)
HAUX build: structures ready
[Giacomo, Deepak]

After spending Monday collecting (chasing?) missing parts and Tuesday installing helicoils, today we were able to start (and finish!) some real assembly work. In particular we assembled:
- 6 HAUX towers, complete of almost all accessories
- 12 pairs of blades supports (including blades already paired for each suspension)
- 6 optic holders (excluding the magnets retro-fits)

We encountered virtually no problem. The quality of the attached picture is bad, but should be good enough to show the progress.

Tomorrow we will likely spend some time re-applying FC to the optics; then we'll proceed to the final steps of the assembly.

I'll refrain from optimistic forecasts about the completion of the job... :-)
Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
giacomo.ciani@LIGO.ORG - 11:01, Tuesday 28 August 2012 (4011)
Sorry, numbers here are clearly wrong (proven by the pictures!). Correct ones:
- 5 HAUX towers, complete of almost all accessories
- 10 pairs of blades supports (including blades already paired for each suspension)
- 6 optic holders (excluding the magnets retro-fits) 
H2 ISC
bram.slagmolen@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:04, Wednesday 22 August 2012 - last comment - 16:40, Thursday 23 August 2012(3951)
OAT locked for the night.

[Alberto, Adam, Bram]

We locked the arm, with a jumpy RefCav. Starting time 21:04 local time, 22 August 2012.

The ETMY has the super sensor with the STS seismometer.

We did various WFS matirx measurements, came up with a matrix ... it looks wrong but seems to work. I set limits on the pit and yaw feedback signal and left them engaged for the night.

It is late, so more details later.

Comments related to this report
bram.slagmolen@LIGO.ORG - 22:04, Wednesday 22 August 2012 (3953)

Got home, check the locking status ... the arm had dropped lock .... I commanded 'caput H2:ALS-Y_REFL_SERVO_IN1EN 0' followed by 'caput H2:ALS-Y_REFL_SERVO_IN1EN 1'  and the cavity locked ... even more surprising it had a REFL power of 7000 ... and it started to move up automatically to 9200!! It seemed that the WFS are workingsmiley

Images attached to this comment
bram.slagmolen@LIGO.ORG - 00:59, Thursday 23 August 2012 (3954)

I tried to write an auto locker script but I hidiously failed. Although it may have something to do with a remote shell. I disengaged the REFL servo as it dropped lock and would not come back in the time I was trying to write the script.

alberto.stochino@LIGO.ORG - 09:46, Thursday 23 August 2012 (3957)

We centered the WFS and repeated the measurement of the sensing matrix. We did it in two ways: a) measuring the frequency response of the PIT and YAW outputs of both BFS A and B when exciting the POS and ANG mode of the cavity at about 4 Hz; b) introducing offsets in the cavity's POS and ANG degrees of freedom and measuring the displacement of the PIT and YAW output of the WFS.

The first method gave us almost degenerate sensing matrix. The second one seemed a bit better. The measured matrix M was:

M =
    0.0157   -0.7306         0         0
    0.0708   -0.6684         0         0
         0         0    0.0598    0.1663
         0         0   -0.0210    0.3363

The PIT and YAW inverted matrices were:

iP =
  -16.2163   17.7263
   -1.7176    0.3814
iY =
   14.2483   -7.0453
    0.8899    2.5339

These are the matrices used for the overnight arm cavity locking.

Th eigenvectors of these matrices are:

VP =
   -0.9931   -0.7741
   -0.1177   -0.6331

VY =
    0.9968    0.5341
    0.0795    0.8454

keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - 16:38, Thursday 23 August 2012 (3963)

(see below)

keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - 16:40, Thursday 23 August 2012 (3962)

This doesn't look crazy, though the two WFS heads are not optimally placed and the table astigmatism is not minimal either.

PIT sensing matrix that Bram posted in the above elog entry actually means this:

|WFSA| = |0.0157  -0.7306| x |POS| = |-0.7306  0.0000| x |-0.021  1| x |POS|
|WFSB|    |0.0708  -0.6684|    |ANG|    | 0.0000 -0.6684|   |-0.110  1|   |ANG|

The columns correspond to POS and ANG excitation, and the rows represent the WFS heads. (Sorry for the crappy formatting, I hope you get that I'm trying to write a matrix equation.)

POS refers to the translation of the cavity axis caused by the rotation of ETM and ITM in the opposite direction by the same amount. ANG refers to the rotation of the cavity axis by the rotation of the ETM and ITM in the same direction by the same amount.

For WFSA, ANG PIT generates a factor of 50-ish bigger signal than POS PIT. For WFSB, ANG IT is about a factor of 10 bigger.

Similarly, if you take the YAW matrix it's this:

|WFSA| = | 0.0598 0.1663| x |POS| = |0.1663 0.0000| x | 0.36 1| x |POS|
|WFSB|    |-0.0210 0.3363|    |ANG|    |0.0000 0.3363|   |-0.06 1|   |ANG|

If you look at the YAW numbers (not shown here but see the above entry by Bram), WFSA is a factor of 3-ish more sensitive to POS YAW than ANG YAW, and for WFSB this is a factor of 16.

Because of the cavity geometry (see below) ANG naturally produces a factor of 3 larger signal than POS. That means that, in terms of Gouy shift from the center of the cavity, WFSA for example is located at atan(-0.021*3) = -3.6 degrees away for PIT. Note that there's an uncertainty of n times pi that is common to all DOFs, and also the sign is sort of arbitrary though it should be consistent for both WFSs.

Anyway, below is the table of Gouy shift: from the waist of the arm in degrees (the above caveat about uncertaintly applies).

           PIT         YAW 
WFSA |  -3.6 deg | +47   deg|
WFSB | -18   deg | -10.6 deg|

PIT and YAW difference in WFSA looks kind of suspiciously large, but I would say that the crappy beam quality on the table could be blamed. It's not the TMS telescope (if it is, we'll see the same thing in WFSB too).

All in all the WFS locations could be adjusted better, and certainly the beam on the table is not passing through the center of lenses, but if the servo works (which we'll find eventually) I'll leave it.

 

----

Why a factor of 3 naturally?

Because we're using ETM substrate for both ETM and ITM, ROC of both is about 2300 m (2312 for EY, 2307 for IY).

Waist (w0=11.5mm for green) is at the center of the cavity, and the divergence angle is theta0=14.6 urad.

If we rotate both of the mirrors by the same amount (theta) as if one is the mirror image of the other, the cavity axis is purely translated by 2000m*theta. In terms of the higher order mode excitation, this is equivalent of

Normalized POS = 2000m * theta / w0 = 1.7e5 * theta.

ANG: If we rotate both of the mirrors by the same amount (theta) in the same direction, the cavity axis is purely rotated around the waist by (2300m * theta * 2)/600m. This is equvalent of

Normalized ANG = (2300m * theta * 2)/600m/theta0 = 5.3E5 * theta.

Therefore a factor of 3.

LHO General
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 19:43, Wednesday 22 August 2012 (3949)
plots of dust counts
Attached are plots of dust counts > .5 microns in particles per cubic foot.
Non-image files attached to this report
H1 IOO
david.feldbaum@LIGO.ORG - posted 19:09, Wednesday 22 August 2012 (3947)
IO FI alignment in PSL

This morning we noticed that the magnetic rotator is not in full contact with its mount. Cheryl identified the problem as due to the fact that the thru-holes drilled in the restraining Omega-shaped rings are not well matched to the corresponding screw-holes in the mount. I gave her the restraining rings for adjustment.

This means that the magnetic rotator is not secured in its mount at the moment. I will not be placing any optics (TGGs and Quartz) inside the magnet until it is secured (required for steps 20-on of the procedure in E0900301).

I have gone through steps 1 thru 19 of E0900301 (at low powers only).

Steps 16-17, s-pol extinction by the 1st Calcite Wedge Polarizor:

s-pol extinction by 1st CWP
incident trans s-pol extinction
1 W 0.59 µW 62.2 dB
5 W 0.13 mW 45.8 dB
10 W 0.26 mW 45.8 dB

Step 19, s-pol extinction by both CWPs:

s-pol extinction by both CWPs
incident trans s-pol extinction
9.85 W 0.313 mW 45.0 dB

Some more adjustment is needed to get to the required extinction of 50 dB.

H1 SEI
hugo.paris@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:11, Wednesday 22 August 2012 - last comment - 10:23, Wednesday 29 August 2012(3948)
HAM2-ISI - Testing progress

Electronics were troubleshooted.

SEI and SUS models were arranged to allow un-tripping HAM2-ISI Payload Watchdogs.

HAM2 model was re-compiled, installed and re-started after that. It is now running.

Matrices were filled

Input and output filters are loaded

The latest version (Version_2) of the unit-specific control scripts were copied from LASTI. They were made ready for use on HAM2. 

Spectra were taken on the ISI tilted. It is the worse configuration for GS13s and they all appear to be working fine (see attached plot).

Transfer function measurements are running overnight.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
hugo.paris@LIGO.ORG - 16:45, Thursday 23 August 2012 (3965)

The transfer functions measured last night had features that are typical to mis-connected sensors/actuators. Deeper analysis allowed narrowing it down the the GS13s. 

We made a program to check for "cross-coupling transfer functions" (e.g. drive on H1, response on H2). It revealed that:

H1-GS13 was read on the channel of H3-GS13 
H2-GS13 was read on the channel of H1-GS13
H3-GS13 was read on the channel of H2-GS13
V1-GS13 was read on the channel of V3-GS13 
V2-GS13 was read on the channel of V1-GS13
V3-GS13 was read on the channel of V2-GS13

We checked our model and did not find a cause for such behaviour there. We moved on the the electronics rack and spotted the issue: GS13 In-field cables were connected to the wrong inputs on HAM2 sensor interfaces.

We ran a quick TF measurement between 500mHz and 5Hz. It confirmed that the sensors were now all correctly connected. This quick measurement is also in good accordance with what we measured on HAM-ISIs in the past which is encourraging.

TF measurement are running overnight on HAM2. They will be over by 7am. 

 

Note: A blinking notification was recently added to HAM-ISI overview MEDM screens (see attachement). It turns the green "measurement" button to blinking yellow when a TF is running. HAM2 overview screen can be seen on the Video6 monitor of the Control Room. 

Images attached to this comment
hugo.paris@LIGO.ORG - 10:23, Wednesday 29 August 2012 (4025)

Hugh and I added screwdriver tips under the top payload mass of HAM2-ISI last week, before the chamber was closed. They helped prevent this big mass of ~600lbs from causing unwanted resonances. Befoire/After comparison plots are attached.

We compared the latest transfer functions with the ones taken on LLO HAM2-ISI during the same phase of testing (Intitial In-Chamber Testing). Plots are attached. Accordance is good. We are confident that the unwanted resonance seen at 96Hz comes from the top mass. We plan on ajusting its boundary conditions with the optical table once the doors of HAM2 chamber are open again. 

Non-image files attached to this comment
LHO General
michael.rodruck@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:27, Wednesday 22 August 2012 (3946)
Ops summary
H2 SEI
vincent.lhuillier@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:48, Wednesday 22 August 2012 (3943)
Sensor correction at HEPI-BSC6 - First try

I have implemented the sensor correction at HEPI-BSC6. Sensor correction improves the isolation performances of the HEPI in the X, Y and Z directions. In attachment, spectra of the L4C installed in the HEPI boots are presented in different configurations:

Non-image files attached to this report
H1 SEI
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:45, Wednesday 22 August 2012 (3944)
WHAM2 Post IAS ISI Elevation Set
JimW CoreyG HughR

With IAS signing off on position yesterday, we did a final check on elevation/leveling and did need to make some vertical adjustments.

We ended up with the Optical Table 0.1mm high at -240.3mm and level to 100urad (+-0.1mm)

These vertical adjustments barely moved the system horizontally--based on Dial Indicators the sw & se corners moved 1 & 2 mils (<0.05mm).

So we have locked up the HEPI and are now doing ISI measurements.  We will continue with ISI testing, then attached HEPI Actuators, followed by a post install (actuators) IAS check if dial indicator readings suggest it is warranted.

Attached is the surveying and dial indicator readings logbook page.
Non-image files attached to this report
H1 PSL
michael.rodruck@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:33, Monday 20 August 2012 - last comment - 16:00, Wednesday 22 August 2012(3898)
DC power connected

Filiberto, Richard, Michael R

The PSL was moved off of the temporary power supplies for 24, 18 and 12V and is now running on the DC power supplies in the H1 electronics room. For the moment, we are still running on the temporary power supplies for high voltage (400V for PMC/ILS, and 180V for FSS), however they were moved into the PSL rack to free up room. The purple cables in the electronics room were redressed as well.

The PSL servos and laser were shutdown for this work, and the key from the control box was removed to make the laser and ante room laser safe (to make David Feldbaums work easier). I plan on turning the laser on tomorrow morning, so it will be off for the night. If all goes well with David's work we may go to high power tomorrow as well.

Comments related to this report
michael.rodruck@LIGO.ORG - 16:00, Wednesday 22 August 2012 (3945)

Laser was restarted yesteday, with the FSS and PMC servos running. The ISS is off because it keeps glitching with work on the table. Watchdogs are on.

Displaying reports 79441-79460 of 83294.Go to page Start 3969 3970 3971 3972 3973 3974 3975 3976 3977 End