Attached are plots of dust counts > .5 microns. I have also attached plots of the modes for dust monitor 1 at end Y, dust monitor 1 in the LVEA and dust monitor 1 in the optics lab to show when they were disconnected. The disconnection at end Y appears to have occurred before the LVEA and labs, indicating that something happened there before the accidental power down of h0epics2.
On behalf of Gerardo and Danny:
Both ears were silicate bonded to the LLO ITM (ITM-08) this week. The mass has been stowed back in it's cake tin and await shipment out to LLO.
(GMoreno, DSellers, BBland, GMorenoJr.)
ITM08 ears were bonded succesfully, ears with SN 59 and SN 64 were used.
SN 59 was used for side S3, and SN 64 for side S4.
After setting the mass on the base of cake tin, a full inspection of ears and mass was performed, no problems found.
Attached are photos of ears on ITM08. Also a photo of the mass as I was putting it away in its cake tin, ready for shipping.
h0epics2 was accidentally powered down. This affected the following IOCs: h0dustlvea, h0dustlab, h0dustey, h0fmcs, h0weatherex, h0weatherey, h0weathermx, h0weathermy. h0epics1 has been powered down and its power cables moved to h0epics2. The only IOC running on h0epics1 was h0time. This has not been restarted. There seems to be a problem with the mouse on the KVM for h0epics2. A usb mouse can be used until this is fixed.
Earlier in the day we had a hard time locking refcav, and I've found that the voltage supply for the RF amplifier was current limited.
I set it to maximum and the problem was gone.
Rick S, Michael R
After some work to optimize gain settings the FSS_FAST_GAIN has been set to 0.2 and FSS_COMMON_GAIN to 0.8. The gain slider on the MEDM screens is not accurate - a change of 0.1 dB on the slider is actually a change of 3 dB.
A new DBB measurement was created and is attached. A snapshot of the open loop transfer function and the error signal are attached as well.
Installed one watec 902H with a 300x zoom lens on the Y beam manifold looking at the baffle for ITMy. Installed an illuminator on a BSC8 port in the vertex with remote controllable power supply for access from EY. Installed a Sony camera on BSC 6 spool looking at the ETM. And an illuminator on a spool port that is powered from the old DC power rack in the LVEA. Ported the video signal from the LVEA to the End station and From the end station to the MSR but have a problem with the MSR as we can not get sync. so lines are rolling through the frames. Will work on getting video into the control room later.
GregG, MitchR, CoreyG, JimW Today Stage1 was completed and flown to the test stand where it was connected to Stage0 on our seventh assembly. This means that MOST of the mechanical superstructure on LHO's last HAM ISI is completed. Still a lot to do (spring pull-down, actuator and sensor installs, optical table, etc.) but most of the remaining sub-assemblies are put together and are just waiting to be attached. The finish line has never been closer...
(Betsy, Danny)
The first secondary prism was glued to MC2 yesterday. It witnessed a 12-16 hour room temperature cure followed by 6 hours of heat lamp curing. The optic was stowed in its cake tin for HVAC work planned in the lab tomorrow. The second primary and secondary prisms will be glued on to the optic next week.
I applied lots of caution tape to the bottom of the spiral staircase to prevent folks from accessing the stairs, E-module, or work platforms around the chamber. I will apply appropriate signage tomorrow.
I spent some time today clearing paraphernalia from ISCT10 and then consulted with Keita as to disposition of said items. Keita will follow-up on getting items put away appropriately. He also asked for the table to be craned into the Squeezer Enclosure so Bubba and crew will take care of that tomorrow.
First thing this morning, the doors were returned to HAM6 and the south door was removed from HAM5. Brushing was completed in HAM5 before lunch.(The condition of this chamber is much better than what we saw in HAM6 and cleaned up nicely.) After lunch, the crew did first vacuum, unwrapped the support tubes, vacuumed the bellows, and started wipe down. By the end of the day, about 1/2 the chamber had been wiped down: that is much closer to the rate of progress that we are used to instead of the VERY SLOW pace we saw in HAM6. We hope to close out tomorrow.
Kyle- Soft-closed GV6, roughed-out GV1 annulus, valved-out BSC8 annulus aux. pump cart, opened GV5, GV6 and GV17
One of the GS13s of HAM-ISI unit #6 (Pod #94) appeared to be defective this week (see aLog 3183).
Greg and I opened it this morning. Two flexures were broken.
One can see wear on the non-broken side of D0901319-v4, s/n199 (Pic. 3,4). The pattern is very similar to what Jim reported in the SEI Log a few months ago.
We also found a small flexure debris. This debris was identified as being part of D0901318-v3 s/n 124 (see black line on pic. 5).
The pod was tested at reception on a leveled surface. Nothing abnormal could be seen on its response at that time. It was then installed in the ISI. No major event was reported (drop/shock/…). Spectra were taken with the ISI tilted and the pod appeared defective. Any spectra, even with the ISI leveled showed it defective after that.
As it already happened, it is possible that the shocks, endured by the instrument during its shipment, damaged the flexures. In these conditions, tilting the pod back and forth to install it, and/or tilting the ISI for testing purposes, could have lead to the breakage.
We have shockwatch data for this shipment. Greg will post it later on.
This shipping log was less eventful, especially as the threshold had been set higher, than the previous LHO-LLO. A big difference in this shipment was the large vertical shocks whereas the previous one had seen mostly horizontal. 3 of the 4 events also happened in Louisiana going by the time stamps.
It appears that pod #94 was already shiped back to LLO in March to be reworked after a pre-amp issue. see alog #2369.
Nothing was noticed on its flexures then. If the flexures were not changed at LLO, they saw at least 3 Livingston-Hanford trips .
In his aLog, Greg also mention a similar issue experienced on Pod #71: Working at reception. Stopped working afterwards. Opened and broken flexure found.
DCC document Q1100073 sensor issues tracking was updated.
I went through the history/time-series/spectra available for the Pod #94 (H1).
06/05 the batch of GS13s the Pod #94 belongs to, is sent from LLO.
06/12 Pod #94, and all the pods of that batch, are huddle tested OK (Plot 1). None of their spectra show partiicularities (H2 channel corresponds to the horizontal GS13 #58 which was already in the ISI).
06/13 Pod #94 is installed in HAM-ISI Unit #6 with the Pod #66(H) from the same batch. Interfaces chassis are turned ON. All instruments are tested OK (Plot 2).
06/14 Plot.3 shows that Pod #94 was functional, with no particularities on its spectra, until the interfaces chassis were turned OFF around 3.45 PM
06/19 Interfaces chassis are turned back ON around 10am. Pod #94 appears defective right away (Plot 4). It seems like the flexure breakage happened during the re-installation of the GS13s, even though no major event was reported (shock, drop, ...).
I can not notice any feature on spectra/time series that would have warned us of upcoming flexure breakages.
While talking about it at today's SEI call, we agreed on gently tilting the GS13s back and forth before huddle testing them at reception, so we can discard the GS13s with flexures that are about to break.
[Thomas, Aidan] Thomas and I tracked the source of clipping on the Hartmann sensor beam. The return beam from the ETM was hitting the edge of one of the mirrors in the back corner of the ALS table (see attached diagram). We tweaked the alignment so that the beam was centered on that optic. The new beam profile on the HWS is attached. There is no sign of clipping now, but the beam quality is a poor Gaussian. There also appears to be horizontal fringes on the beam.
Max F., Keita K., Daniel S. We had a hard time finding the beat node by adjusting the crystal temperature. Once we came close to the correct frequency the line would simply vanish. This seems to be related to mode hopping. The diode current was about 1.43A. We noticed that increasing the diode current by simultaneously adjusting the temperature to keep the beat frequency close to 40MHz allowed us to widen the acceptable temperature range and improved the beat node strength. Around 1.9A there was another mode hope, so we backed off the diode current to 1.666A. This re-adjustment of the diode current seemed to have increased the gain in the PLL. We had to reduce the common gain to -23dB (down by 3dB) to make it stable again. We also found that the gain in the digital temperature stabilization servo only has a small range where it would work. Adding 10dB would make it unstable, whereas subtracting 10dB made it go to the rails. Even with the correct gain, we noticed that the PZT voltage would often go beyond +/-1V. Our readback has a gain of 10 and saturates just above 1V. (This readback is used as the error point of the temperature stabilization servo.) The following changes were made to the ASL common mode board, S/N S1102638 (H2 EY): R272 removed (from 374), R271 replaced by 0 Ohm (from 3.32K). The readback now has a gain of 1 and the temperature servo should work over the full PZT range.
The H2 SUS ETMY Simulink model was modified to incorporate the Optical Lever photodiode signals on the second ADC card of 'h2susb6'. The EPICS library part was removed from 'h2susetmy.mdl' which imported the signals from the temporary H2 ETMY optical lever Simulink model. The signals are read from the second ADC, ADC_1, on the H2 SUS ETMY front-end,'h2susb6'. After a few recompiles, the model was installed, along with the 'h2sustmsy' model.
Part of the Assembly Validation testing of HAM-ISIs (that happens in the staging building) consists in taking power spectra with the ISI tilted. It allows us to check that the sensors, especially the seismometers, work in tilted position as well. To do so, spectra are taken with a 10kg mass set at each of the 6 corners of the optical table (Locations A to F in ISI_Tilted)
This test revealed that GS13-H1 (Pod #94) was not functioning correctly. Symptoms are the same as observed on previous failing GS13s. The response of the instrument drops dramatically below 60Hz (ISI_Not_Tilted) which is characteristic of a stuck seismic mass.
This instrument was tested OK at reception from LLO. It is very likely that the tilting of the ISI induced the sticking of the seismic mass.
We have one last spare horizontal GS13 (Pod #18). It will be installed as replacement today. Testing of this unit will start over with sensor spectra, as soon as it is installed.