Displaying reports 81241-81260 of 84583.Go to page Start 4059 4060 4061 4062 4063 4064 4065 4066 4067 End
Reports until 17:24, Friday 13 July 2012
H2 CDS
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:24, Friday 13 July 2012 (3438)
all three H2 PEM models restarted with new MAG, ACC, MIC channels

Robert and Maggie hooked up new ACC, MIC and MAG signals in both the LVEA and EY. At EY new signals were attached both to the h2pemey front end and the h2pemeyaux (Newtonian Noise) front end.

I build new models for h2peml0, h2pemey and h2pemeyaux and restarted them on the front ends h2tcsl0, h2pemey, h2pemeyaux respectively.

I then restarted the H2 DAQ to get the new channels into the frame.

H2 ISC
bram.slagmolen@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:42, Friday 13 July 2012 - last comment - 09:33, Monday 16 July 2012(3437)
Lenght to Pitch decoupling filter

More detail will follow, but we determined how to get the length to pitch decoupling filter (jsut a confirmation), and using the Quad models we generated the length-to-pitch decoupling filter, for placement in the 'DriveAlign Matrix' in the M0 path.

The frequency dependent response is -Length-to-Pitch / Pitch-to-Pitch (with a gain factor).

Using plotallquad_dtttfs.m and quad_l2p.m in /ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/QUAD/Common/MatlabTools, I generated Dl2p_2012_07_13.mat. Is has a frequency vector and the coupling vector.

Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
bram.slagmolen@LIGO.ORG - 09:33, Monday 16 July 2012 (3448)

I modified the script to include the M0 Long-2-Pitch and the Pitch-2-Pitch transfer functions as well.

Non-image files attached to this comment
LHO General
gerardo.moreno@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:12, Friday 13 July 2012 (3436)
Ops Shift Summary

Activities for the day:

- Kyle vacuum work at HAM03, 8:44 - 8:58 am.

- Robert and Maggie, then Filiberto joined, PEM work, YBM area. 8:55 - 9:52 am.

- Jim W. and Mitchell R. work at HAM02, 9:21 - 10:56 am.

- Eric A. in and out of the LVEA, to check are around HAM02 and HAM03, 9:29 - 9:31 am.

- Douglas D. in to LVEA to put tools away, in and out, 9:37 - 9:40 am.

- Sno Valley to service HVAC @ X-End, 10:00 am

- Michael R, work at PSL, 10:04 - 10:18 am.

- Ski, work at mechanical room, 10:00 - 10:23 am.

- Justin B. visit the LVEA and to read a gauge,

- Maggie, et.al. to visit Y-End station EE racks, PEM work.

- Spotted forklift, green one, driving away from OSB towards LSB, 11:38 am.

- Kyle, LVEA work at HAM06, read a gauge, 1:23 - 1:28 pm.

- Michael R. and Rick S. visit PSL racks, 11:00 - 2:00 pm.

- Mitchell R. work at HAM03, 1:51 - 3:10 pm.

- Dominick, Y-End cable work at EE racks, 2:00 pm

- Received one momentarily dust alarm.

 

H1 PSL
michael.rodruck@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:40, Friday 13 July 2012 (3435)
Change to TTFSS box

Rick S, Michael R

The 1k resistors R80, R85 in the FAST path and R71, R76 in the COMMON path were swapped out with 2k resistors to access a full range of gain. The gain in the medm filters for these paths was adjusted from 2048 to 1024 to compensate.

After the box was reinstalled on the table with the original medm slider gain settings (23dB for common, 8dB for fast) we found the UGF had changed and couldn't quite be recovered by using the gain slider. We found that the transmitted PD was low, only reading about 1V, and has been trending down the past few months from 5V. A quick alignment touch up of the periscope mirrors (in vertical) upstream of the ref cav increased the voltage to 2.8, but more work on the FSS path is needed to recover the lost light. We settled at 25dB for common gain.

The RFPD DC signal is dead so we can't compare the reflected to transmitted.

Images attached to this report
H1 SEI
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:52, Friday 13 July 2012 (3434)
HAM2 Cabling

(corey, mitch)  [this work was for Thursday 7/12]

While there was a lot of HEPI hustle and bustle at HAM3, Mitch and I took the opportunity to do cabling work on HAM2.  For SEI, most of the cabling has been run, but I cleaned it up a little bit (especially the insanely inaccessible Corner3 path).  I also installed our grounding/mounting brackets for our GS13s.  For Corner3 work, I actually went in-chamber, climbed on table and hung out in the beam tube for this work---it wasn't that bad as far as access.

Mitch had cabling for SUS & ISC, so we went ahead and started running these cables (per a drawing which escapes me).  We started on the west side, and I did a couple of cables on the north side, while I was in the chamber.  We finished off getting ready to do the east side, but ran out of time.  I'd say we completed about 75% of the SUS/ISC cabling.

Now while handling some of these cables, I noticed that one of the (4) screws on the face of the connector fell out.  I checked the other screws and they were all a bit loose (a half/full turn), so I went ahead and tightened all of them.

Cleanliness note:  Will these chambers get vacuumed again?  While in chamber I noticed particles in the bellows (a piece of glove, and a fairly big (1-2mm) plastic piece).

Images attached to this report
H1 IOO
dale.ingram@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:19, Friday 13 July 2012 (3433)
Photos of 7/10/12 optics prep
On the afternoon of 7/10, Betsy glued magnets onto MC2 and Gerardo glued a prism onto a PUM.  The photo collection sits in ResourceSpace.
Images attached to this report
H1 SUS
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:40, Thursday 12 July 2012 (3432)
PR2 SUS moved to chamber side table

Today, Travis, Andres, and Jeff hoisted the PR2 SUS out of the storage container and placed it onto the chamber side table.  We'll work towards getting it connected to electronics and resuspend the all metal masses likely next week.

H1 SUS
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:21, Thursday 12 July 2012 (3427)
IMCC-02 officially becomes HAM3 MC2

Today, I packed up and transported the fully outfitted IMCC optic to the HAM chamberside install area.  It took all 4 of us (Jeff, Travis, Andres, and I) to get it into the suspension and suspended as a single stage. At first glance however, it seems to have only minor pitch error which is a relief. We finished resecuring the optic with EQ stops and face covers and left it under its C3 tent for the night.  We'll still need to finish suspending and tweeking alignment before taking TFs.

X1 SEI
hugo.paris@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:05, Thursday 12 July 2012 (3431)
Monitoring Temperature in Staging Building

In order to assess the effect of recent temperature changes on our testing, I installed 2 Lascar Temperature/Humidity data-loggers in the staging building:

#1 Is inside a cleanroom. I set it on the West SEI test stand (currently used for the testing of HAM-ISI Unit #6). Pic.1
#2 Is outside the cleanrooms, against the south wall, behind the East SEI test stand (currently used for the assebly of HAM-ISI Unit #7). Pic.2,3

 

Setup for the Data-Loggers:

Note: Loggers' data is collected with a Windows-only software. This software is available on the solidworks station.

 

 

Thanks to SUS for letting us borrow the loggers from them.

Images attached to this report
H1 ISC
matthew.evans@LIGO.ORG - posted 19:42, Thursday 12 July 2012 (3430)
OAT - calibrated spectra (up to 500Hz)

The noise above 200Hz is probably frequency noise from the fiber link which carries the stabilized beam from the corner station (see T0900376).  The broadband floor to the frequency noise is about 1Hz/rtHz, with acoustic peaks from ~50Hz up that reach ~30Hz/rtHz.  This will translate to a flor around 15pm/rtHz in the arm cavity spectrum (see entry 3413, and the ALS wiki page).

Images attached to this report
H2 AOS
thomas.vo@LIGO.ORG - posted 19:36, Thursday 12 July 2012 (3428)
H2 ETMY Optical Lever Install Update
Thomas Vo Scott(Apollo) Matt Evans


By offsetting the pitch and yaw test filters on the M0 stage we can see the optical lever beam move in pitch and yaw respectively.  For a sanity check, I also independently put an offset on the reaction mass test filters and this did not affect the optical lever beams so I'm sure that we are not seeing another ghost beam off the reaction mass.

BUT!!!

One thing I noticed is that there is another beam close to our currently aligned beam, approximately 3 cm away.  After looking up some specs for the test mass depth (~34cm) and the gap between the reaction mass (~5mm), Matt and I did some calculations and it looks like the beam that we are currently aligning to is the reflection off the back surface which will give you the same transfer function results as a front surface reflection.  Looking at the reflectivity/transmission data for the ETMy shows that the primary reflection off the front surface is comparable to the secondary reflection off the back surface so it is difficult to judge by eye which one is which.  These calculations will be needed in future installs for correct alignment. For optical levers with large lever arms such as ITMy (optical path ~ 60 meters), the wedge will play a significant role in determining the correct beam as well.

The solution is to go back and open up the enclosures to do yet another re-alignment to look for the correct beam off the front, that would require a soft close of the gate valve.  The reflection off the back surface will still be able to give pitch and yaw, unless the other beam encroaches on the photodetector.  
LHO General
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:45, Thursday 12 July 2012 (3426)
plots of dust counts
Attached are plots of dust counts > .5 microns in particles per cubic foot. I have included a plot of the mode of the dust monitor at location 15 in the LVEA (H0:PEM-LVEA_DST15_MODE) to show when the communication to it was lost.
Non-image files attached to this report
H1 SEI
greg.grabeel@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:30, Thursday 12 July 2012 (3425)
HAM6 Shipping Container Nitrogen Purge
Attached is the accumulated data of the LN2 purge on the HAM6 shipping container. At this point bumping the flow rate up to ~20 L/m has encouraged the dew point to continue to drop. After the dewar ran empty yesterday it has since been refilled, hooked back up, and data logging continues.
Images attached to this report
H1 SEI
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:02, Thursday 12 July 2012 (3424)
H1 HAM3 HEPI Work
Greg Jim & Hugh
We tweaked the position again per IAS (Jason) and then set to attaching HEPI Actuators.  We ended up behind where we started when we found we were unable to attach the Actuator on the NW corner.  We had to jack up the Crossbeam and slide the HEPI Housing East.  This gets quite involved and we are now out of position again based on the Dial Indicators.  We'll continue with attachment and may request looks by IAS as we go.
LHO General
michael.rodruck@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:12, Thursday 12 July 2012 (3423)
Ops summary
Images attached to this report
H2 TCS
eleanor.king@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:03, Thursday 12 July 2012 - last comment - 19:39, Thursday 12 July 2012(3422)
Ring heater test

The ring heater was turned on today to check whether running the ring heater had an effect on the vacuum pressure.   15W of power was put through each segment of the ring heater at 19:07:30 UTC until 19:37:08 UTC (by adding an offset of 25,000 counts to H2TCSETMY _EMTY_RING_HTR_SEG1_DC_I_SET and H2TCSETMY_ETMY_RING_HTR_SEG2_DC_I_SET), which is close to the maximum ouput of the ring heater.  The vacuum in BSC6 was not affected by running the ring heater, which is good.

 

I added in gains to the ring heater input and readout channels so that the we can input the current in amps and readout the voltage and ring current on volts and amps instead of counts (reffering to D1002529 for  the required conversion factors).

Comments related to this report
thomas.vo@LIGO.ORG - 19:39, Thursday 12 July 2012 (3429)
Just a note, the temperature sensors are in fact broken on these ring heater segments, the attached image shows the signals railed for the sensors.
Images attached to this comment
LHO VE
kyle.ryan@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:57, Thursday 12 July 2012 (3421)
Opened GV18


			
			
H1 ISC
alberto.stochino@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:06, Thursday 12 July 2012 - last comment - 09:45, Thursday 19 July 2012(3420)
TMS ISC Table Stability

I measured the TMS ISC table angular and lateral stability when the end station VEA was quiet last night.

I found the table displacement to be around 5-10 um rms laterally and 1-3 urad rms in angle over 100s. The motion thus appears to be within the requirements: 100 um and 1 urad, respectively.

See attached plots. The bump below 1 Hz is probably due to the table's roll mode. A peak shows up at about 8 Hz due to the table enclosure: opening the table's doors reduced its amplitude.
 
The measurement was done with the PZT loops closed. These loops use the TMS green QPD error signals and have a UGF of about 8 Hz. I then calibrated the PZT control signals according to the manufacturer's specs and used the ABCD matrix of the beam path from the PZT onwards on the ALS table (see attached drawings for the optical details). Fianlly I compensated for the loop gain.
 
Initially the spectrum looked mostly flat up to 10 Hz, masking any features of the TMS table motion. After checking for several causes, eventually turning off the HEPA filters in the ALS table as Bram suggested, solved the problem. The airflow due to the HEPA filters was shaking the PZTs and the other optics on the table. This shouldn't be a problem during science mode, when the filters are meant to stay off. The plot attached shows a comaprison of the PZT control signal spectra with the HEPA filters ON (reference traces) and OFF.
 
Data and matlab code code are in the svn: /svn/cdsutils/trunk/ALS/TMS_stability 
I found the table displacement to be around 5-10 um rms laterally and 1-3 urad rms in angle over 100s. The motion thus appear to be within the requirements: 100 um and 1 urad, respectively. See attached plots.
 
The bump below 1 Hz is probably due to the table's roll mode. A peak shows up at about 8 Hz due to the table enclosure: opening the table doors reduced the amplitude.
 
The measurement was done with the PZT loops closed. These loops use the TMS green QPD error signals and have a UGF of about 8 Hz. I then calibrated the PZT control signals according to the manufacturer's specs and used the ABCD matrix of the beam path from the PZT onwards on the ALS table (see attached drawings for the optical details).
 
Initially the spectrum looked mostly flat up to 10 Hz, masking any features of the TMS table motion. After checking for several causes, eventually turning off the HEPA filters in the ALS table as Bram suggested, solved the problem. The intense airflow due to the filters was shaking the PZT and the other optics on the table. This shouldn't be a problem during science mode, when the filters are off.
I measured the TMS table angular and lateral stability when the end station VEA was quiet.
I found the table displacement to be around 5-10 um rms laterally and 1-3 urad rms in angle over 100s. The motion thus appear to be within the requirements: 100 um and 1 urad, respectively. See attached plots.
 
The bump below 1 Hz is probably due to the table's roll mode. A peak shows up at about 8 Hz due to the table enclosure: opening the table doors reduced the amplitude.
 
The measurement was done with the PZT loops closed. These loops use the TMS green QPD error signals and have a UGF of about 8 Hz. I then calibrated the PZT control signals according to the manufacturer's specs and used the ABCD matrix of the beam path from the PZT onwards on the ALS table (see attached drawings for the optical details).
 
Initially the spectrum looked mostly flat up to 10 Hz, masking any features of the TMS table motion. After checking for several causes, eventually turning off the HEPA filters in the ALS table as Bram suggested, solved the problem. The intense airflow due to the filters was shaking the PZT and the other optics on the table. This shouldn't be a problem during science mode, when the filters are off.
I measured the TMS table angular and lateral stability when the end station VEA was quiet.
I found the table displacement to be around 5-10 um rms laterally and 1-3 urad rms in angle over 100s. The motion thus appear to be within the requirements: 100 um and 1 urad, respectively. See attached plots.
 
The bump below 1 Hz is probably due to the table's roll mode. A peak shows up at about 8 Hz due to the table enclosure: opening the table doors reduced the amplitude.
 
The measurement was done with the PZT loops closed. These loops use the TMS green QPD error signals and have a UGF of about 8 Hz. I then calibrated the PZT control signals according to the manufacturer's specs and used the ABCD matrix of the beam path from the PZT onwards on the ALS table (see attached drawings for the optical details).
 
Initially the spectrum looked mostly flat up to 10 Hz, masking any features of the TMS table motion. After checking for several causes, eventually turning off the HEPA filters in the ALS table as Bram suggested, solved the problem. The intense airflow due to the filters was shaking the PZT and the other optics on the table. This shouldn't be a problem during science mode, when the filters are off.
I measured the TMS table angular and lateral stability when the end station VEA was quiet.
I found the table displacement to be around 5-10 um rms laterally and 1-3 urad rms in angle over 100s. The motion thus appear to be within the requirements: 100 um and 1 urad, respectively. See attached plots.
 
The bump below 1 Hz is probably due to the table's roll mode. A peak shows up at about 8 Hz due to the table enclosure: opening the table doors reduced the amplitude.
 
The measurement was done with the PZT loops closed. These loops use the TMS green QPD error signals and have a UGF of about 8 Hz. I then calibrated the PZT control signals according to the manufacturer's specs and used the ABCD matrix of the beam path from the PZT onwards on the ALS table (see attached drawings for the optical details).
 
Initially the spectrum looked mostly flat up to 10 Hz, masking any features of the TMS table motion. After checking for several causes, eventually turning off the HEPA filters in the ALS table as Bram suggested, solved the problem. The intense airflow due to the filters was shaking the PZT and the other optics on the table. This shouldn't be a problem during science mode, when the filters are off.
I measured the TMS table angular and lateral stability when the end station VEA was quiet.
I found the table displacement to be around 5-10 um rms laterally and 1-3 urad rms in angle over 100s. The motion thus appear to be within the requirements: 100 um and 1 urad, respectively. See attached plots.
 
The bump below 1 Hz is probably due to the table's roll mode. A peak shows up at about 8 Hz due to the table enclosure: opening the table doors reduced the amplitude.
 
The measurement was done with the PZT loops closed. These loops use the TMS green QPD error signals and have a UGF of about 8 Hz. I then calibrated the PZT control signals according to the manufacturer's specs and used the ABCD matrix of the beam path from the PZT onwards on the ALS table (see attached drawings for the optical details).
 
Initially the spectrum looked mostly flat up to 10 Hz, masking any features of the TMS table motion. After checking for several causes, eventually turning off the HEPA filters in the ALS table as Bram suggested, solved the problem. The intense airflow due to the filters was shaking the PZT and the other optics on the table. This shouldn't be a problem during science mode, when the filters are off.
Initially the spectrum looked mostly flat up to 10 Hz, masking any features of the TMS table motion. After checking for several causes, eventually turning off the HEPA filters in the ALS table as Bram suggested, solved the problem. The intense airflow due to the filters was shaking the PZT and the other optics on the table. This shouldn't be a problem during science mode, when the filters are off.Initially the spectrum looked mostly flat up to 10 Hz, masking any features of the TMS table motion. After checking for several causes, eventually turning off the HEPA filters in the ALS table as Bram suggested, solved the problem. The intense airflow due to the filters was shaking the PZT and the other optics on the table. This shouldn't be a problem during science mode, when the filters are off.
Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
alberto.stochino@LIGO.ORG - 06:49, Thursday 19 July 2012 (3494)

These are the close loop plots of the same measurements.

Non-image files attached to this comment
alberto.stochino@LIGO.ORG - 09:45, Thursday 19 July 2012 (3498)

As Keita noted, the HEPA-off curves show a large bump at around 100mHz which which goes above spectra with the HEPA on. It's not clear why.

H2 TCS
eleanor.king@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:52, Thursday 12 July 2012 (3404)
Hartmann sensor imaging of the ETM

I've aligned the Hartmann plate onto the conjugate image plane of the ETM.  This was done by yawing the ETM periodically (excitation of H2:SUS-ETMY_M0_TEST_Y_EXC at 0.25Hz and 200 counts) and measuring the amount of motion of the beam spot on the CCD with the Hartmann plate removed.  Using DTT I obtained a transfer function of spot movement on the CCD over the yaw in the ETM (H2:TCS-HWS_ETMY_ITMM_CENTER_X/H2:SUS-ETMY_L1_WIT_YMON).    I moved the lens F1 along the beam path to find the position where the transfer function was zero, at which point the HWS CCD is at the image plane of the ETM.  Attached is a graph of the transfer function versus the position of F1.

The HWS was then moved back 11mm (see second attachment) so that the Hartmann plate rather than the CCD is located at the ETM image plane.  The Hartmann plate has been reattached.  The next step is to look at the quiescent prism and defocus of the beam on the HWS.  

Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
Displaying reports 81241-81260 of 84583.Go to page Start 4059 4060 4061 4062 4063 4064 4065 4066 4067 End