Displaying reports 8621-8640 of 83939.Go to page Start 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 End
Reports until 17:23, Thursday 02 May 2024
H1 ISC (ISC, SUS)
anamaria.effler@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:23, Thursday 02 May 2024 (77586)
BS and ITMX damping contributions to DARM

Today I repeated a few damping loop injections that we had done at LLO. I did all 6 BOSEMs on the BS and 3 on ITMX. I injected circa 100 above ambient. I did not see anything for the BS injections, and saw a small coupling on the ITMX. It remains to be seen if the other suspensions slowly add up to a significant contribution to DARM. Sheila recommended that Josh, the new fellow, take this on in consultation with Jeff so we sat down and I passed on the methods. 

The dtt's are to be found in: /ligo/home/anamaria.effler/dtt/damping/ and each test is saved separately. The first attachment shows an example injection on the BS, with the references being the background. The second attachment shows the injection awggui. I did a uniform noise with an 8th order butterworth bandpass 10 to 100 Hz. The gain was 600 for all BOSEMs tested, BS and ITMX. For DARM projection it's best to inject directly at the OSEM basis such that the noises are easy to add up incoherently.

I copied over a coupling calculation code to be found in: /ligo/home/anamaria.effler/scripts/
The three python files there, as well as the darmcalGDS_meters.txt should be copied to be used. The coupling_utils.py is kinda all that's needed, but an example usage is in test_coupling_utils.py. In this script, at the bottom, one can choose the channel injected, add the times for the background and injection, duration and the frequency range to be used, filename to save the data, etc. It will show and save a plot of the derived estimated ambient contribution to DARM from that injection. See example plot for ITMX F2 in the third attachment. It also saves a text file of the coupling function to be used for noise budgets, but only of the measured blue points (which are determined by the darm threshold chosen - for this data I chose 2). I set the default DARM to be GDS CLEAN but it can be changed in the call of the coupling function or in the base code.

Images attached to this report
H1 General
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:18, Thursday 02 May 2024 (77584)
Ops EVE Shift Start

TITLE: 05/02 Eve Shift: 23:00-07:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Lock Acquisition
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Ryan C
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: CALM
    Wind: 13mph Gusts, 8mph 5min avg
    Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.09 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:

Currently at ADS_TO_CAMERAS. wind low, around 15mph

H1 General (SEI)
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:09, Thursday 02 May 2024 (77573)
OPS Thursday day shift end

TITLE: 05/02 Day Shift: 15:00-23:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 159Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Oli
SHIFT SUMMARY: Robert replaced all the view-ports, so the LVEA is ready to be transitioned back to SAFE whenever. We broke back into the 160s today, we briefly hit 161.8 Mpcs. Johnson Controls finished and headed out around 21:10UTC.

Lock#1

17:52UTC Lost lock right before 11.5 hours, possibly from a jack being used in the optics/pcal lab

Lock#2

No good flashes, went through CHECK_MICH. PRMI then locked pretty low but ASC was able to fix it

18:18 UTC VPW major dust alarm, 0 to 80k in a few seconds. It came down after 10-15 minutes

18:21UTC Lost lock after turning on BS_STAGE2 too early, from the alignment not being that great? The next attempt I held us in engage_drmi_asc for a few minutes before continuing.

4 SDF diffs I accepted, relating to SCRL FF and Y2LI accepted SDF diffs for Sheilas SCRL FF gain and Y2L measurements

21:49 UTC lockloss

Lock#3

We struggled to get past ENGAGE_DRMI_ASC, the BS was getting kicked (glitches?) mostly seen by the ST1 L4Cs and T240s

Relocking at MAX_POWER right now

LOG:                                                                                                                                                                                                                            

Start Time System Name Location Lazer_Haz Task Time End
15:11 SAF LASER HAZARD LVEA YES LVEA is LASER HAZARD 19:03
16:00 pem Robert EndY N Turn on an amplifier 16:13
16:01 LSC Sheila CR N SRCL FF, Y2L 17:21
16:22 VAC Jordan MidY N CP3 pump 16:56
16:23 FAC Kim H2 N Tech clean 16:33
17:00 CAL Rick, Francisco PCAL lab LOCAL PCAL work 21:07
16:39 SQZ Terry Optics lab Local SQZ work 18:14
16:40 PEM Robert EndY then X N Move amplifier 17:29
16:43 CAL Rick LVEA Y Parts search 16:59
17:03 SQZ Kar Meng Optics lab N SQZ work 18:14
17:20 CAL Tony CER, PCAL lab N/local Grab a laptop then PCAL work 21:07
17:48   Betsy LVEA Y Checks 18:03
18:05 PEM Robert LVEA Y Put viewports back on 18:25
20:23 SQZ Terry Optics lab LOCAL SQZ work 22:51
20:47 SQZ Kar Meng Optics lab LOCAL SQZ work 23:21
21:15 SQZ Camilla Optics lab LOCAL Join SQZ crew 23:05
22:02 CAL Tony, Francisco PCAL lab LOCAL PCAL work 23:02
22:06 CAL Rick PCAL lab LOCAL PCAL work 23:06
Images attached to this report
H1 ISC
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:52, Thursday 02 May 2024 - last comment - 16:10, Friday 03 May 2024(77583)
PRCL gain to high in DRMI on REFL 1F, manually adjusted to get IFO locked

We had several locklosses from DRMI in the last hour.  PRCL was oscillating at just above 100 Hz, because it's gain was too high.  I reduced the PRCL1 gain from 8 to 4.  I then remeasured once DRMI was transitioned to 3F, the gain was now too low by a factor of 2, so I set it back to 8. 

I won't make this change in the guardian, because I don't know if this is consistent or not.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
anthony.sanchez@LIGO.ORG - 16:10, Friday 03 May 2024 (77600)

My notes on this PRCL motion before locklosses:
I have found multiple other times where PRCL has had rapid motion like seen in the above alog.  Screen shots included below.
This is just in ISC state 101 so far. 
But it does seem like this started on the 23rd, as I have not been able to find a time when this happened before April 23rd.
 


List of Locklosses that have happened in ISC state 101
    ID     GPS     UTC     guardian state     state duration     tags     analysis status
0     1398722295     1398722295.375     2024-05-02 21:57:57.375000 UTC     101             fail
1     1398342613     1398342613.1875     2024-04-28 12:29:55.187500 UTC     101         INITIAL_ALIGNMENT     fail
2     1397959320     1397959320.25     2024-04-24 02:01:42.250000 UTC     101     0:00:52     MAINTENANCE EARTHQUAKE INITIAL_ALIGNMENT     analyzed [0.29.1]
3     1397958844     1397958844.0     2024-04-24 01:53:46.000000 UTC     101         MAINTENANCE EARTHQUAKE     fail
*4     1397918529     1397918529.375     2024-04-23 14:41:51.375000 UTC     101             analyzing     -----------Good Example
*5     1397915450     1397915450.0     2024-04-23 13:50:32.000000 UTC     101             analyzing   -----------Good Example
6     1397490602     1397490602.0625     2024-04-18 15:49:44.062500 UTC     101     0:00:12         analyzed [0.29.1]
7     1397351257     1397351257.566406     2024-04-17 01:07:19.566406 UTC     101         WINDY OMC_DCPD REFINED     fail
8     1397349619     1397349619.261719     2024-04-17 00:40:01.261719 UTC     101         REFINED WINDY INITIAL_ALIGNMENT OMC_DCPD     fail
9     1397333742     1397333742.512695     2024-04-16 20:15:24.512695 UTC     101     0:00:33     WINDY REFINED     analyzed [0.29.1]
10     1397226213     1397226213.3125     2024-04-15 14:23:15.312500 UTC     101         INITIAL_ALIGNMENT     fail
11     1396929654     1396929654.377441     2024-04-12 04:00:36.377441 UTC     101         REFINED INITIAL_ALIGNMENT     fail
12     1396880628     1396880627.856934     2024-04-11 14:23:29.856934 UTC     101     0:00:11     REFINED     analyzed [0.29.1]
13     1396751608     1396751608.208984     2024-04-10 02:33:10.208984 UTC     101         REFINED     analyzing
14     1396370541     1396370540.857422     2024-04-05 16:42:02.857422 UTC     101         REFINED     fail
15     1396368947     1396368941.705078     2024-04-05 16:15:23.705078 UTC     101         REFINED OMC_DCPD     fail
16     1396363292     1396363292.875     2024-04-05 14:41:14.875000 UTC     101         FSS_OSCILLATION BOARD_SAT EARTHQUAKE INITIAL_ALIGNMENT     fail
17     1396184286     1396184286.200195     2024-04-03 12:57:48.200195 UTC     101

 

 


Make Histogram of the following data after excluding DAQ restarts:

['H1:GRD-ISC_LOCK_STATE_N.mean,m-trend']
<H1:GRD-ISC_LOCK_STATE_N.mean (0.0166667Hz, MTREND, FLOAT64)>
lines read from servers: 47066
Number of time values where Query state H1:GRD-ISC_LOCK_STATE_N == state 101 is true: 277
Number of Unique times the channel was in such a state: 149
Length of SCstart: 149 Length of SCstop: 149 length of duration 149

0 1396042620 1396042620 0
1 1396042920 1396042920 300
2 1396095060 1396095060 52140
3 1396098000 1396098000 2940
4 1396133820 1396133820 35820
5 1396165320 1396165320 31500
6 1396184700 1396184700 19380
7 1396200540 1396200600 60
8 1396214760 1396214760 14220
9 1396218300 1396218300 3540
10 1396246980 1396246980 28680
11 1396358340 1396358340 111360
12 1396359600 1396360260 660
13 1396361700 1396361700 2100
14 1396362120 1396363200 1080
15 1396367940 1396367940 5820
16 1396368180 1396368180 240
17 1396368420 1396368840 420
18 1396370160 1396370160 1740
19 1396370460 1396370460 300
20 1396385340 1396385340 14880
21 1396451220 1396451220 65880
22 1396494480 1396494480 43260
23 1396548420 1396548600 180
24 1396549140 1396549320 180
25 1396686480 1396686480 137340
26 1396686780 1396686780 300
27 1396728060 1396728060 41280
28 1396746360 1396746360 18300
29 1396747140 1396747140 780
30 1396749420 1396749420 2280
31 1396752120 1396752120 2700
32 1396769520 1396769520 17400
33 1396773900 1396773900 4380
34 1396774140 1396774140 240
35 1396790760 1396790760 16620
36 1396794540 1396794540 3780
37 1396814460 1396814460 19920
38 1396814760 1396814820 60
39 1396930080 1396930140 60
40 1396930380 1396930440 60
41 1396998480 1396998480 68100
42 1397047080 1397047260 180
43 1397047500 1397047680 180
44 1397144280 1397144280 96780
45 1397146080 1397146080 1800
46 1397146620 1397146740 120
47 1397173920 1397173920 27300
48 1397187300 1397187300 13380
49 1397190360 1397190600 240
50 1397225160 1397225160 34800
51 1397226120 1397226120 960
52 1397229900 1397229900 3780
53 1397292240 1397292300 60
54 1397292600 1397292600 360
55 1397335440 1397335560 120
56 1397346900 1397346900 11460
57 1397354820 1397354820 7920
58 1397357220 1397357220 2400
59 1397370960 1397370960 13740
60 1397458140 1397458140 87180
61 1397458440 1397458620 180
62 1397466240 1397466240 7800
63 1397471460 1397471460 5220
64 1397471760 1397471760 300
65 1397494320 1397494320 22560
66 1397524440 1397524440 30120
67 1397524740 1397524800 60
68 1397526420 1397526420 1680
69 1397538420 1397538600 180
70 1397538900 1397538900 480
71 1397599800 1397599800 60900
72 1397600520 1397600700 180
73 1397601000 1397601060 60
74 1397646900 1397646900 45900
75 1397647140 1397647200 60
76 1397647740 1397647800 60
77 1397662560 1397662560 14820
78 1397663220 1397663220 660
79 1397690400 1397690400 27180
80 1397715900 1397715900 25500
81 1397716260 1397716260 360
82 1397716740 1397716860 120
83 1397718120 1397718120 1380
84 1397720280 1397720280 2160
85 1397720520 1397720520 240
86 1397726160 1397726160 5640
87 1397727180 1397727180 1020
88 1397763780 1397763780 36600
89 1397766480 1397766540 60
90 1397848140 1397848140 81660
91 1397848440 1397848500 60
92 1397852880 1397852880 4440
93 1397853660 1397853660 780
94 1397867760 1397867760 14100
95 1397868720 1397868780 60
96 1397912580 1397912580 43860
97 1397915820 1397915820 3240
98 1397916060 1397916060 240
99 1397918940 1397919000 60
100 1397937540 1397937540 18600
101 1397952300 1397952480 180
102 1397952960 1397952960 660
103 1397956860 1397957040 180
104 1397957280 1397957280 420
105 1397957880 1397957880 600
106 1397958600 1397958780 180
107 1397959680 1397959860 180
108 1397960220 1397960220 540
109 1397976900 1397976900 16680
110 1397977140 1397977140 240
111 1398037920 1398037980 60
112 1398038280 1398038280 360
113 1398081000 1398081000 42720
114 1398194400 1398194400 113400
115 1398195300 1398195300 900
116 1398219480 1398219480 24180
117 1398219780 1398219900 120
118 1398252540 1398252540 32760
119 1398275280 1398275280 22740
120 1398276660 1398276660 1380
121 1398341760 1398341760 65100
122 1398359160 1398359340 180
123 1398360060 1398360240 180
124 1398361020 1398361020 960
125 1398381240 1398381420 180
126 1398382260 1398382440 180
127 1398553560 1398553560 171300
128 1398554100 1398554100 540
129 1398574020 1398574080 60
130 1398574560 1398574740 180
131 1398574980 1398574980 420
132 1398607740 1398607740 32760
133 1398619380 1398619380 11640
134 1398619680 1398619800 120
135 1398620340 1398620460 120
136 1398629940 1398630120 180
137 1398630360 1398630360 420
138 1398661560 1398661740 180
139 1398662160 1398662160 600
140 1398664260 1398664320 60
141 1398708420 1398708420 44160
142 1398709140 1398709140 720
143 1398722220 1398722220 13080
144 1398723240 1398723240 1020
145 1398724620 1398724620 1380
146 1398733740 1398733800 60
147 1398734040 1398734220 180
148 1398734580 1398734700 120

 

 Looking for times where PRCL is above 1000:
['H1:LSC-PRCL_IN1_DQ.mean,m-trend']
<H1:LSC-PRCL_IN1_DQ.mean (0.0166667Hz, MTREND, FLOAT64)>
lines read from servers: 47066
Number of time values where Query state H1:LSC-PRCL_IN1_DQ > state 1000 is true: 11
Number of Unique times the channel was in such a state: 3
Length of SCstart: 3 Length of SCstop: 4 length of duration 4
1396110540 1396110660 120 120
1396117620 1396117800 180 180
1397322360 1397919840 597480
Counting states completed
Times ISC_Lock was in Aquire_DRMI_1F [101]
Start: Stop: Duration: Min: Max:
0 1396110540 1396110660 120
1 1396117620 1396117800 180
2 1397322360 1397322480 120


Maybe be use this channel H1:LSC-PRCL_TRIG_MON to check filter out times.

 

 

Images attached to this comment
H1 General (Lockloss)
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:53, Thursday 02 May 2024 - last comment - 16:29, Thursday 02 May 2024(77581)
Lockloss at 21:49UTC

21:49 UTC lockloss

DCPD sat then LL

Comments related to this report
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - 16:29, Thursday 02 May 2024 (77585)

23:24 Observing

Had to accept sdf for SUS-ETMY_L3_LOCK_BIAS_OFFSET to get into Observing

Images attached to this comment
H1 ISC
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:48, Thursday 02 May 2024 - last comment - 14:48, Thursday 02 May 2024(77576)
retuned Y2L gains/ instructions

I tuned the Y2L gains in the same way as in 77539

I've added two templates to userapps/asc/h1/templates/manually_tune_P2L.xml and manually_tune_A2L.xml 

These templates have excitations for LOCK P (or Y) for each suspension at 30 Hz.  In all the quads, we have bandstops for 30 Hz in ISCINF_P and Y (FM7).  To do this I turned all 8 of those filters on, then one at a time inject 30 Hz into Lock for each DOF, checking for the height of the peak in DARM, coherence with the injection, and the transfer function of the excitation to DARM.  I changed the gain to improve the transfer function until the phase flips. 

If this has to be done frequently we should make a script that will do this, as it seems that the script that calculates based on the ratio of transfer functions doesn't work well.

The attachment shows that the improvement in DARM from today's commissoning time mostly comes from SRCL feedforward (and maybe the ESD bias tuning), but that the CHARD Y coherence hasn't changed much.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - 14:41, Thursday 02 May 2024 (77580)

Accepted in SDF

Images attached to this comment
H1 DetChar (DetChar, ISC)
evan.goetz@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:11, Thursday 02 May 2024 - last comment - 14:27, Tuesday 07 May 2024(77579)
DuoTone signal seen in h(t)
This may already be known, but in case it is not I am posting it in the aLOG again. In Fscan spectra, we can see the 960 Hz and 961 Hz DuoTone signal in h(t). I don't recall seeing this in previous observing run data. Is the DuoTone signal expected to be seen in h(t)? It is hard to see on the summary pages, but it can be seen in the Fscan plots or interactive spectrum. I attach a zoom from the interactive plots from May 1, but this can also be seen as far back as the start of O4a. It is also seen at L1.
Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
joseph.betzwieser@LIGO.ORG - 14:27, Tuesday 07 May 2024 (77696)
Just wanted to add in a DARK spectrum as reference to this, indicating this is coming from the local electronics chain, and given I see some of this on the same ADC but non-DCPD channels, likely within the chassis itself.  I also see even more of a 1 Hz forest than Evan's plot.  See for example LLO alog: 71027.
Images attached to this comment
H1 General
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:14, Thursday 02 May 2024 (77578)
OPS Thursday day shift update

Lockloss during comissioning time at 17:52UTC, 1 issue relocking which was due to the alignment not being the best.

We just returned to Observing at 19:31 UTC, I accepted SDF diffs for Sheilas SCRFF gain and Y2L measurements.

H1 General (Lockloss)
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:28, Thursday 02 May 2024 - last comment - 11:53, Thursday 02 May 2024(77574)
Lockloss at TRANSITION_DRMI_TO_3F

18:21 UTC, SRM saturation then LL. The ASC loops were not done working when GRD advanced us to turn on BS_STAGE2

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 11:53, Thursday 02 May 2024 (77575)

I think what happened here was that the ASC had not converged before the guardian moved on, and probably the BS ST2 glitch caused the lockloss.  (I haven't looked into this).

It would be great for someone to look carefully at the timing of this lockloss, compared to the BS glitch.  It would also be good to compare this to a lock when we survive the BS glitch, (the next one), to see if there is a difference in the alignment signals or build ups that we could use as a check for the automation.

H1 General (SEI)
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:55, Thursday 02 May 2024 (77572)
Lockloss at 17:52

HEPI HAM1 watchdog trip, ACT. Potentially from a jack being used in the optics lab

https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~lockloss/index.cgi?event=1398707582

Images attached to this report
H1 ISC
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:27, Thursday 02 May 2024 - last comment - 12:09, Thursday 02 May 2024(77570)
SRCL FF gain adjusted

I adjsuted the gain of the SRCLFF filter while running a SRCL injection to reduce the coupling to DARM.  (Screenshot attached). I've add the gain of 1.15 to the lscparams file so that the guardian will use this gain in future locks.

This is similar to what Gabriele did in 77492, and the calibration of traces in his screenshot is the same as mine (they are made using the same template.)  Gabriele's "new FF" (red trace, -160 dB at 30 Hz) is giving worse performance today, shown by the blue trace "Old FF" in my plot, (-145dB at 30 Hz).

So it seems the SRCL FF gain that we need has changed quite a bit.  This may be because of the OMC alignment offsets that Jennie Wright added to improve our optical gain in 77543

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - 12:09, Thursday 02 May 2024 (77577)

Accepted in SDF

Images attached to this comment
LHO VE
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:18, Thursday 02 May 2024 (77571)
Thu CP1 Fill

Thu May 02 10:15:33 2024 INFO: Fill completed in 15min 29secs

Gerardo confirmed a good fill curbside.

Images attached to this report
H1 General
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:01, Thursday 02 May 2024 (77567)
OPS Thursday day update

We've started comissioning which will run from 16:00 - 19:00 UTC (9am - 12pm PST). Some of the plans include, SQZ tuning, PEM injections, SRCL FF, and Y2L.

H1 General
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:03, Thursday 02 May 2024 (77566)
OPS Thursday day shift start

TITLE: 05/02 Day Shift: 15:00-23:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 153Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Corey
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: CALM
    Wind: 5mph Gusts, 4mph 5min avg
    Primary useism: 0.01 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.09 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:

H1 General
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:00, Thursday 02 May 2024 - last comment - 09:11, Thursday 02 May 2024(77565)
Ops EVE Shift End

TITLE: 05/02 Eve Shift: 23:00-07:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 151Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Corey
SHIFT SUMMARY: During relocking we were able to catch DRMI without needing to go through PRMI, but had locklosses from ENGAGE_DRMI_ASC and TURN_ON_BS_STAGE2 before I started an initial alignment. During initial alignment we couldn't get past WFS_CENTERING_SRY, so I just took us out of IA and started relocking. LVEA is still in LASER HAZARD.

LOG:

22:49 Detector Locked for 2 hours
00:10 Dropped Observing to run SQZ and regular calibrations
00:19 Went to NLN_CAL_MEAS for calibration measurements
00:30 Earthquake mode activated
00:50 Back to NOMINAL_LOW_NOISE and Observing
01:00 Seismic to CALM

04:59 Lockloss
05:10 Lockloss from ENGAGE_DRMI_ASC
05:18 Lockloss from TURN_ON_BS_STAGE2 - started an initial alignment
05:37 - 05:45 Stuck at SRC alignment
    - Constant SRM, IFO_OUT, SQUEEZE_OUT saturations
    - We weren't able to get past WFS_CENTERING_SRY, so I took us to DOWN
    - Backed out of initial alignment and started relocking
06:27 NOMINAL_LOW_NOISE
06:30 Observing

Start Time System Name Location Lazer_Haz Task Time End
21:25 SQZ Terry, Camilla Opt Lab Local SHG work, new CO2 test 23:51
22:09 PCAL Rick, Fransisco PCAL lab local PCAL tasks 00:09
23:16 VAC Janos, Jordan MY n Turn off CP3 pump 23:31
Comments related to this report
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - 09:11, Thursday 02 May 2024 (77568)

ASC_AS_C wasn't really seeing much light during the WFS_CENTERING_SRY align attempts?

Images attached to this comment
H1 General
minhyo.kim@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:38, Tuesday 23 April 2024 - last comment - 15:09, Thursday 02 May 2024(77346)
DARM BLRMs change

Minhyo, Sheila

Changed the gain values of the RANGE BLRMS's filters (RLP_1 ~ 7) at 17:48:44 (UTC).
I referenced the accumulated BNS range in Apr.-11 and Apr.-17, to reverse calculated the additional factors for the filter gains (1/BNS = scope * factor).
The New gain values are defined as (Prev. gain) * (Avg. Factor).

Attached three screenshots are; 1) Accumulated BNS range plot, 2) Factor calculation, 3) H1OAF.diff after made all changes.

 

 

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
minhyo.kim@LIGO.ORG - 15:09, Thursday 02 May 2024 (77582)

Made mistake on gain value in RLP_6.
Changed value from 5.24E-7 to 5.24E-5.

Images attached to this comment
Displaying reports 8621-8640 of 83939.Go to page Start 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 End