Displaying reports 8801-8820 of 88171.Go to page Start 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 End
Reports until 14:40, Tuesday 10 December 2024
H1 AOS
jonathan.hanks@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:40, Tuesday 10 December 2024 - last comment - 14:06, Wednesday 11 December 2024(81737)
WP 12239 Moving EPICS related processes to other hardware in order to do a rebuild of a VM hypervisor
As part of WP 12239 we moved h0epics, cdsvmscript1, epics-burt, autoburt off of the cds0proxmox hypervisor.  This resulted in a few minutes of down time for the dust monitor IOC around 8:19am localtime.

After this we done we were able to look at cdsproxmox.  Its boot drive had failed.  After some help from Fil we got the drives replaced and reinstalled proxmox ve on cdsproxmox.  We adjusted DNS and renamed the box cdsproxmox0.

Some notes:

 * This is now in a temporary state.  We aim to retire this hardware by or at the end of O4.  New hypervisor computers are being procured.  As such we did not provision much storage on this.  Just enough to run the hypervisor, relying on the shared storage layer to handle the VM.

 * As per the proxmox administrators guild we removed cdsproxmox from the cluster prior to attaching it back as cdsproxmox0.
Comments related to this report
erik.vonreis@LIGO.ORG - 14:06, Wednesday 11 December 2024 (81770)

to change a disk image name in proxmox,

Get the numeric id for the VM from the web interface

Turn off the VM

edit /etc/pve/nodes/<hypervisor hostname>/qemu-server/<id>.conf

Change the disk image name and save the file.

Find the disk image file and change its name also.

Restart the VM. It will load from the renamed file.

H1 SUS
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:15, Tuesday 10 December 2024 - last comment - 16:44, Monday 16 December 2024(81736)
In-Lock SUS Charge Measurements for December 10th FAMIS

Closes FAMIS#28383, last checked 81688

Once again, the coherence for ITMX bias drive bias off is below the coherence threshold - this time the coherence is 0.01, much lower than the threshold of 0.1, so there are once again no new analyzed measurements for ITMX.

ETMX, ETMY, ITMX, ITMY

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - 16:44, Monday 16 December 2024 (81858)

Checked that the measurements for ITMX bias are running and the same magnitude for bias in and bias off. They are at a lower magnitude than the quadrant injection on the ESDAMON/LVEASDAMON  so we could think about increasing the magnitude if we are not happy with the 81688 no charge build-up on the test mass conclusion. We also still have a pending "to do" from Vlad in 79597: explicitly cast DARM data to np.float64

Images attached to this comment
H1 IOO
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:29, Tuesday 10 December 2024 (81735)
IM4 trans QPD centered

I've used the pico to center IM4 trans QPD.   See alogs about this history: 80604 78962 78943 78856

 After difficulty with input alignment shifts in the spring, we centered IM4 with the hopes that we could use that as a reference for any future input alignment shifts to reset the IMs.  However this didn't work well when the PMC was swapped.  Now we are recentering IM4 trans to get this new reference since we've been operating here for a while.

Images attached to this report
H1 TCS (DetChar)
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:57, Tuesday 10 December 2024 - last comment - 15:51, Tuesday 10 December 2024(81734)
Added adjustable fiber collimator to HWS ETMX, SLED laser left on.

TJ, Camilla. WP12162. Continuing work in 76030

We installed a CFCS11-A adjustable SMA fiber collimator on the 50um fiber for the ETMX HWS fiber coupled LED source M530F2. This improved the size of the beam but it was still too large at the edge of the collimators range.

We removed HWS-L3 (D1800270) which made the beam a better size but still a little large ~ 10-15mm diameter at the periscope. We couldn't see a change in the beam by adjusting HWS-L2 (on translation stage). We aligned the system using the retrofection of the ALS beam: aligned ALS beam to output coup;er with HWS-MS1 and then adjusted the fiber collimator (mounted in mirror mount) to aligned the HWS output to the final iris. Confirmed we were getting a reflection of ETMX by mis-aligning it ~20urad. Note that the beam looks cleaner than usual photo, probably because the GV is closed so we are getting no retroflection of ITMX. Set frequecy to 1Hz. Replaced the mask photo and started the HWS code with new references.

The ETMX HWS 520nm beam in now injected into the vacuum where it hasn't been for ~months. Tagging DetChar. 

To do: measure the beam profile of beam out of fiber and re- calculate an imaging solution of the ETMX HR surface. 

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - 15:51, Tuesday 10 December 2024 (81741)

This afternoon, I went back down the EX and measured the beam profile of the beam out of the collimator.  Results attached. Photos of beam profile after source, after HWP and after BS attached. 

Images attached to this comment
Non-image files attached to this comment
LHO VE (VE)
travis.sadecki@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:52, Tuesday 10 December 2024 (81733)
GV5 and GV7 cycled

GV5 and GV7 were soft closed at ~10am local time today to facilitate equipment craning for crane inspections.  They were opened at ~11am local time at the completion of the vertex crane inspection.

H1 PSL
jason.oberling@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:50, Tuesday 10 December 2024 (81732)
Water added to PSL chiller

This morning, Ryan let me know that he got a "Check PSL chiller" verbal alarm.  Upon checking the chiller I saw the water level was a little low but not at minimum, but the usual oscillations in the water level as the chiller does its thing were getting a little close; this is likely what caused the alarm.  I added 175 mL of water to the chiller to bring the water level back up to the MAX line.

H1 TCS
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:46, Tuesday 10 December 2024 (81731)
TCS Chiller Water Level Top-Off - BiWeekly

Closes FAMIS27804

CO2X was found at 29.5, i added 200ml to get it to right under the MAX line at 30.3.

CO2Y was found at 8, I added 250ml to get it to just under the MAX line at 9.4.

H1 AOS
eric.otterman@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:02, Tuesday 10 December 2024 (81729)
Low instrument air pressure overnight 12/8 -12/9
Early Monday morning I was alerted to the lag compressor alarm on the instrument air compressor. Both compressors were running and the tank pressure was increasing until it reached cut-out pressure. I inspected for any signs of an air leak but didn't find anything obvious. I observed the compressor and found that when the air dryer swapped desiccant towers it began blowing down a lot of air. The poly-tube connections beneath each dryer had a build-up of ice. I cleared the ice out as best as I could and observed the dryer for another several cycles, but the problem did not reoccur. We will continue to monitor the performance of the air dryer. 
H1 CDS
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:47, Tuesday 10 December 2024 (81727)
GV7 and GV5 Alarms bypassed while they are soft-closed
Images attached to this report
H1 DAQ
daniel.sigg@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:47, Tuesday 10 December 2024 (81728)
TwinCAT slow controls software updated

We added some code to recognize the more revent timing board firmware revisions.

LHO VE
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:32, Tuesday 10 December 2024 - last comment - 10:45, Tuesday 10 December 2024(81725)
Tue CP1 Fill

Tue Dec 10 10:10:41 2024 INFO: Fill completed in 10min 38secs

 

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - 10:45, Tuesday 10 December 2024 (81726)

Today's TC-mins only just exceeded the -70C trip level (-75C,-74C). For tomorrow's fill I've increased the trip to -65C.

H1 TCS (PEM)
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:21, Tuesday 10 December 2024 (81723)
CO2s turned off while IFO locked at 15:41UTC: SQZ changed in YAW, need to repeat to see coulpling to Crab Puslar at 59Hz

Camilla, Robert, WP12232

While looking for coupling of CO2 chillers into DARM at Crab pulsar 59Hz 81246, and also CO2s effect on SQZ 72244, this morning we turned off the CO2s and stayed locked ~40 minutes which is longer than we expected. Unsure of the lock loss cause as maintenance activities had started.

We aimed to see if the 59Hz coupling to DARM peak changed (needs ~20 minutes+ of data), but the accelerators showed that by increasing the CO2 power dumped in the water cooled beam dump, the load on the chillers changed and the 59Hz peak moved ~0.1Hz which means that it would be very difficult to see in DARM.

In attached plot, can see that the SQZ (especially at high frequency) got worse without CO2s. The SQZ ASC also changed the alignment mainly in YAW, does that mean that the CO2s need some alignment improvements in YAW? Looking at HWS signals, the optics substrate absorption changes as expected and started to level out, although the simulation didn't expect them too level out yet.

In future, to repeat this test, we could dump to 1.7W going into DARM using a normal beam-dump to dump the 1.7W before the periscope so that the load on the chiller isn't changed but the CO2 is not on being injected and anything that could backscatter light after the periscope is blocked. Alternatively, we could shake the table. Still the VPs themselves could be a source of scatter as are only AR coated at 10.6um, meaning they reflect up to 15% of 1064nm per surface DCC D1100439.

Images attached to this report
H1 General
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:30, Tuesday 10 December 2024 - last comment - 08:01, Tuesday 10 December 2024(81720)
OPS Tuesday day shift start

TITLE: 12/10 Day Shift: 1530-0030 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Lock Acquisition
OUTGOING OPERATOR: TJ
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: CALM
    Wind: 9mph Gusts, 6mph 3min avg
    Primary useism: 0.03 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.42 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:

Comments related to this report
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - 08:01, Tuesday 10 December 2024 (81721)

Running the range comparison for both hours of the bad range this morning vs an hour of good range earlier in the same lock. The noise looks to be largly above ~30Hz.

Non-image files attached to this comment
H1 CDS
erik.vonreis@LIGO.ORG - posted 06:18, Tuesday 10 December 2024 (81719)
Workstations updated

Workstations were upgraded and rebooted.  This was an OS packages upgraded.  Conda packages were not upgraded.

H1 General
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - posted 22:03, Monday 09 December 2024 (81718)
Ops Eve Shift End

TITLE: 12/10 Eve Shift: 0030-0600 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 158Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: TJ
SHIFT SUMMARY: Currently Observing at 158 Mpc and have been Locked for 4 hours. The range is okay now, but we did go through a patch of low range that looks very similar to the low range from the last lock. For both this lock and  the previous lock it looks like the low range started around the same time after locking, 1 hour and 20 minutes after the lock started(ndscope). I couldn't find anything with squeeze or the jitter diaggui.
LOG:

00:26 Running an initial alignment
01:26 Initial alignment done, relocking

02:06 NOMINAL_LOW_NOISE    
02:09 Observing  

Start Time System Name Location Lazer_Haz Task Time End
21:59 CDS Erik, Jonathan MSR N VM Server Setup 23:58
00:07 CDS Jonathan, Erik LVEA remote Moving virtual machines 00:39
00:08 PCAL Tony PCAL y(local) Getting sttuff ready for tomorrow 00:29
00:22 PEM Robert LVEA YES Putting viewport covers back on 01:22
Images attached to this report
LHO General
ibrahim.abouelfettouh@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:39, Monday 09 December 2024 - last comment - 10:31, Tuesday 10 December 2024(81711)
OPS Day Shift Summary

TITLE: 12/10 Day Shift: 1530-0030 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Earthquake
INCOMING OPERATOR: Oli
SHIFT SUMMARY:

IFO is LOCKING and in ENVIRONMENT due to EARTHQUAKE.

We had a few good hours of locking today but as with yesterday, earthquakes have been rampant. Here are details:

LOG:

Start Time System Name Location Lazer_Haz Task Time End
23:03 HAZ LVEA IS LASER HAZARD LVEA YES LVEA IS LASER HAZARD 06:09
17:08 FAC Karen MY N Technical Cleaning 17:42
17:09 PEM Robert LVEA YES Viewport setup 18:09
19:54 PEM Robert LVEA YES Recording lock acquisition from viewport 20:13
21:59 CDS Erik, Jonathan MSR N VM Server Setup 23:58
22:34 FAC Tyler EX N Cryopump check 21:34
22:48 EE Fil Recieving Rollup N Item transport 23:48
00:07 CDS Jonathan, Erik LVEA remote Moving virtual machines 00:35
00:08 PCAL Tony PCAL y(local) Getting sttuff ready for tomorrow 00:29
00:22 PEM Robert LVEA YES Putting viewport covers back on 01:22
Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - 10:31, Tuesday 10 December 2024 (81724)SQZ

Attached is DARM for the no SQZ test time (~10 minute averages). It seems like the noise stopped before the test started. We are seeing worse DARM around 20Hz with SQZ.

Images attached to this comment
H1 TCS (DetChar, DetChar-Request, ISC)
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:33, Monday 09 December 2024 - last comment - 11:04, Tuesday 10 December 2024(81705)
Turned off CO2s for 2 min during poor range

Camilla C, TJ S

This morning we had another period where our range was fluctuating almost 40Mpc, previously seen on Dec 1 (alog81587) and further back in May (alog78089). Camilla and decided to turn off both TCS CO2s for a short period just to completely rule them out, since previously there was correlation with these range dips and a TCS ISS channel. We saw no positive change in DARM during this short duration test, but we didn't want to go too long and lose lock. CO2s were requested to have no output power from 16:12:30-16:14:30UTC

The past times that we have seen this range loss, the H1:TCS-ITMX_CO2_ISS_CTRL2_OUT_DQ channel and the H1:SQZ-FC_LSC_DOF2_OUT_DQ channel had noise that correlated to the loss, but theISS channel showed nothing different this time (attachment 2). We also were in a state of no squeezing at the time. So it's possible that this is a completely different type of range loss.

DetChar, could we run Lasso or check on HVETO for a period during the morning lock with our noisy range?

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jane.glanzer@LIGO.ORG - 11:04, Tuesday 10 December 2024 (81730)DetChar

Here is a link to a lasso run during this time period. The two channels with the highest coefficients are a midstation channel H1:PEM-MY_RELHUM_ROOF_WEATHER.mean and a HEPI pump channel H1:HPI-PUMP_L0_CONTROL_VOUT.mean. 

H1 OpsInfo (ISC)
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:27, Saturday 02 November 2024 - last comment - 20:26, Monday 09 December 2024(81015)
Inspiral range integrand and DARM comparison tool for low range checks

Using the darm_integral_compare.py script from the NoiseBudget repo (NoiseBudget/aligoNB/production_code/H1/darm_integral_compare.py) as a starting point, I made a version that is simplified and easy to run for when our range is low and we want to compare range vs frequency with a previous time.

It takes two starting times, supplied by the user, and for each time, it grabs the DARM data between the start time and an end time of starttime+5400 seconds (1.5 hours). Using this data it calculates the inspiral range integrand and returns two plots(pdf) - one showing the range integrand plotted against frequency for each set of data(png1), and then the second plot just shows DARM for each set of data, along with a trace showing the cumulative difference in range between the two sets as a function of frequency(png2). These are saved both as pngs and in a pdf in the script's folder.

This script can be found at gitcommon/ops_tools/rangeComparison/range_compare.py. To run it you just need to supply the gps times for the two sets of time that you want to compare, although there is also an optional argument you can if you want the length of data taken to be different than the default 5400 seconds. The command used to generate the PDF and PNGs attached to this alog was as follows: python3 range_compare.py --span 5000

Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - 20:26, Monday 09 December 2024 (81717)

I appearently didn't do a very good job of telling you how to run this and forgot to put the example times in the command, so here's a more clear (actually complete) explanation

To find the script, go to:

cd /ligo/gitcommon/ops_tools/rangeComparison/

and then to run the script:

python3 range_compare.py [time1] [time2]

where time1 and time2 are the gps start times for the two stretches of time that you want to compare. The default time span it will run with for each time is 5400 seconds after the start time, but this can be changed by using the --span command followed by the number of seconds you want. For example, the plots from the original alog were made by running the command python3 range_compare.py --span 5000 1414349158 1414586877

Displaying reports 8801-8820 of 88171.Go to page Start 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 End