Displaying reports 981-1000 of 85743.Go to page Start 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 End
Reports until 10:10, Wednesday 01 October 2025
LHO VE
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:10, Wednesday 01 October 2025 (87244)
Wed CP1 Fill

Wed Oct 01 10:07:13 2025 INFO: Fill completed in 7min 9secs

 

Images attached to this report
H1 General (Lockloss)
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:09, Wednesday 01 October 2025 (87243)
Locklosses from Observing

Looked at the last 6 locklosses from Observing. 

Could see nothing much in all but one of them, 1443315128 where ETMX_L3 and DARM get noisy in the 70ms before LL, plot attached

Images attached to this report
LHO General
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:34, Wednesday 01 October 2025 (87242)
Ops Day Shift Start

TITLE: 10/01 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 153Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Oli
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: SEISMON_ALERT_USEISM
    Wind: 10mph Gusts, 7mph 3min avg
    Primary useism: 0.04 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.51 μm/s 
QUICK SUMMARY: Locked for 3.5 hours. Two GRB shorts passed through, E606087 and E606088 at 1418 and1431UTC. No alarms. The useism is just getting above the 90 percentile.

Plans for today...Observe!

H1 SQZ
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - posted 23:22, Tuesday 30 September 2025 (87241)
Ops OWL SQZ troubleshooting

H1 Manager woke me up complaining about having been out of Observing for over 10 minutes. I checked and found that the issue was that the OPO ISS was not able to stay locked. I took the detector to NO_SQZING, took the OPO guardian to LOCKED_CLF_DUAL_NO_ISS and noted that OPO trans was around 62 uW, much lower than our 80 uW setpoint, so I used 86767 as a checklist of what to do, since we had had the same issue a few weeks ago.

I checked the SHG temp (it had been updated earlier today (87233), and it was still looking good and above 90mW, so I went to the next step from that alog - adjusting the half wave plate that's in the SHG path between the 200 MHz AOM and the SHG Rejected Power PD. I had an ndscope open with H1:SQZ-OPO_TRANS_LF_OUTPUT and H1:SQZ-SHG_LAUNCH_DC_POWERMON, and adjusted the wave plate a step at a time until the SHG launch power was about/above what it had been before (~26uW), and OPO trans was above the 80 uW setpoint. Once that was done, I was able to relock and reinject squeezing with no issues and went back into Observing.

LHO General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 22:01, Tuesday 30 September 2025 (87236)
Tues EVE Ops Summary

TITLE: 09/30 Eve Shift: 2330-0500 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 146Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Oli
SHIFT SUMMARY:

Locking was not trivial (seems like first time in many weeks for me).  Wish I could say I solved the issue, but really all I did was run a 2nd alignment and then let H1 lock.
LOG:

H1 General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 19:29, Tuesday 30 September 2025 - last comment - 21:14, Tuesday 30 September 2025(87239)
Mid-Shift Status: H1 Down 90 Min With Good DRMI But No Locking

H1 had a lockloss about 90min ago for no obvious reasons.  All was quiet as well.  Attempted to relock but DRMI did not look great; also went for Check MICH Fringes + PRMI---could not even get PRMI locks after letting it try for 20min.  Ultimately went for an alignment and where we are.  Flashes look mostly decent and POP18/90 are flashing close to 200, but just have not had any locks (only a few short ~1sec locks thus far).  Microseism is just under the 95th percentile.  Currently at 20min of DRMI locking.

Comments related to this report
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 21:14, Tuesday 30 September 2025 (87240)

After over 3hrs, H1 finally locked an "xRMI"!!  It took lots of waiting, 2-alignments, and me leaving the Control Room (with Lockloss Alerts on my phone) and working on the JAC table to stop me looking at DRMI and H1 trying/struggling....and just let them do their thing!  (was about ready to make some phone calls!  Oh and we are currently in USEISM state.

4:05utc Back to Observing (since being down since 0:51utc).

H1 SEI
anthony.sanchez@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:47, Tuesday 30 September 2025 (87238)
H1 ISI CPS Sensor Noise Spectra Check - Weekly

Famis task 26658 H1 ISI CPS Sensor Noise Spectra Check - Weekly


Compairing to https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=87025
HAM7_CPSINF_V2 & HAM7_CPSINF_V3 look a bit elevated around 36hz. 
ETMX_ST2_CPSINF_V3 has a 16hz increase in it, actually so does ST1.



 

LHO General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:51, Tuesday 30 September 2025 (87235)
Tues EVE Ops Transition

TITLE: 09/30 Eve Shift: 2330-0500 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 149Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: TJ
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: CALM
    Wind: 7mph Gusts, 4mph 3min avg
    Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.40 μm/s 
QUICK SUMMARY:

H1's been locked 3+hrs (locking post-Maintenance went smoothly according to TJ!).  

There is a CE/ET beam tube meeting going on this week (will be locking doors at "close of buisiness tonight).

Also got word from Erik that we can test a new ndscope with "ndscope -test".

H1 TCS
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:35, Tuesday 30 September 2025 (87234)
New ITM HWS References Taken while at 25W Move spots.

Dave, TJ, Camilla

While Dave was troubleshooting a HWS file issue (started in 84865 but just noticed via HWS Live issues), TJ and I took new HWS references for ITMX and ITMY while we were re-locking at 25W in, MOVE_SPOTS. This is not the best place to take new references, so we plan to take new references again next Tuesday while in DOWN with a cool IFO. 

Yesterday Matt and I realized that the ITMX HWS frequency had been at 57Hz rather than the nominal 1Hz since the power outage which was making the SPHERICAL_POWER signal very noisy, reverted to 1Hz.

H1 SQZ
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:28, Tuesday 30 September 2025 (87233)
SQZ Pump Path Alignment Adjusted

WP12822, Sheila, Camilla 

Followed what we did in 82881, but did not need to adjust alignment through the EOM. Last done only ~6 weeks ago in 86323

SHG Power dropped when we opened the table and turned on the fan and again when we closed up so we adjusted the SHG TEC temperature twice, it ended up where it started, plot attached

Starting with:

Then with 0V on ISS AOM controlmon, increased throughput, this was a yaw move of the AOM, moving the AOM in +X. Then put 5V on controlmon and started to maximize the 1st order beam. We decided to not completely maximize 1st order as this reduces overall throughput and our current aim is to increase total green throughout, not ISS AOM range.

Ended with:

Sheila then adjusted the alignment into the fiber and maximized H1:SQZ-OPO_REFL_DC_POWER (needed to reduce power going into fiber with pico-waveplate to avoid saturating PD).

This allowed us to have an OPO setpoint of 80uW with 25mW going into the fiber, with 5 on the controlmon and a spare~20mW that we could give to the fiber.  Note that after ~2hours, the controlmon had decreased from 5 to 4. So the power to the AOM may need to be increased next time we loose lock.

I checked the NLG and OPO temp in the process:

OPO Setpoint Amplified Max Amplified Min UnAmp Dark NLG
80 0.0132987 0.000179 0.0005779 -1.67e-5 22.4
Images attached to this report
LHO General
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:32, Tuesday 30 September 2025 (87220)
Ops Day Shift End

TITLE: 09/30 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 152Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Corey
SHIFT SUMMARY: Fairly light maintenance day, with relocking being automated other than me testing out some tramps at find ir. as of right now we have been locked for 1 hour.
LOG:

H1 TCS
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:23, Tuesday 30 September 2025 (87232)
HWS EY Power Measured.

WP#12819 Elenna, Camilla 

Elenna and I went to the EY VEA, opened the ALS table and measured the power out of the HWS collimator, there was 9uW out of the collimator and 31uW out of the fiber, before the collimator. We didn't take the wincam down there but I've attached two photos of the beam, one straight after the colimator, and one before HWS-S2 D1400241. It looks very top-hat like. 

Images attached to this report
H1 SUS
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:02, Tuesday 30 September 2025 (87231)
OSEM Calibration Update for PRM and SRM

Edgard ran the OSEM calibration calculations for the measurements Jeff and I took last week for PRM(measurements, results) and SRM(measurements, results). Today, I updated the OSEMINF gains with the newly calibrated ones for their respective suspension and OSEM, and I also installed the compensation gains into the DAMP filters for PRM and SRM to counter the apparent shift in alignment due to the updated calibration OSEM gains.

To update the OSEMINF gains I put the stage, OSEM, and gain values into a txt file and used my script /ligo/home/oli.patane/Documents/WIP/estimator/OSEMcalib_updateOSEMINFgains.py to go through and update all the OSEM gains. Here are the outputs for that - PRM, SRM.

To add the DAMP compensation gains in the DAMP filter bank, I put the dof and gain values into a txt file (only for M1) and used my script /ligo/home/oli.patane/Documents/WIP/estimator/OSEMcalib_DAMPcomp.py to remove the old filters that were in FM7 (they were not being used and are sdf'd if we end up needing them again) and replaced them with the compensation gains. Here are the outputs for that - PRM, SRM, and here are the filter changes before I loaded them in - PRM, SRM.

I then went through and turned FM7 on for DAMP M1 for PRM and SRM, and then went through the safe.snap and observe.snap and accepted the gain and filter status changes (PRM, SRM).

These updates means that there will be an apparent change in alignment on PRM and SRM, but this change in alignment is not real.

Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
H1 OpsInfo
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:27, Tuesday 30 September 2025 (87230)
Reduced ALS_DIFF Find IR tramps

There are two tramps in the LONG_SEARCH_IR state in ALS_DIFF for when we are trying to find IR, I've changed these to 1 second when stepping around a known value and to 2 seconds when transitioning to a new known value. Previously these were 4 and 10 respectively. 

Years ago I tested this and found that I couldn't rush this pzt, but I didn't document why or to what extend. I've been frustrated with how long it has been taking, so I wanted to try it out again and see if I could speed it up and/or find out why I couldn't before. I couldn't really create any issues, but perhaps they only rear their head up when we aren't the best aligned. I ended up bringing them down to the values listed above with repeated success so I'll leave it there and continue locking.

Images attached to this report
H1 SUS
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:55, Tuesday 30 September 2025 (87228)
OSEMINF compensation filters updated to align with satamp swap: PR2 (M2, M3) and SR2 (M2, M3)

Continuing with our satamp swaps for the lower stages, Fil swapped out the M2 and M3 satamps for PR2 and SR2 today (87225). To properly compensate for this change, I used the TIA measurements Jeff took for each satamp's channels and used my script /ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/Common/PythonTools/satampswap_bestpossible_filterupdate_ECR_E2400330.py to update the compensation filters (satampfilterupdate_output). I then checked that they looked good(PR2, SR2) and loaded them in.

Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
H1 General
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:24, Tuesday 30 September 2025 (87227)
LVEA swept

I adjusted a PEM cable to be more out of the walking path by the TCSY table and I also unplugged, rolled up, and moved an unused extension cable out of the way in the same area. I also put folded away a ladder that was out next to SUS R4.

H1 SEI
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:20, Tuesday 30 September 2025 - last comment - 09:10, Wednesday 08 October 2025(87226)
HAM4 ISI coil driver found making a ticking noise, probably a fan

This morning while in the CER for other reasons, I heard a coil driver on HAM4 ISI making a ticking/chirping noise. Fil suggested this was probably a fan, so we've pulled the chassis to check it out. We've put in a spare and will run that until next maintenance probably.

Chassis pulled is S1100320, the spare we put in is S1103567. Frs is https://services1.ligo-la.caltech.edu/FRS/show_bug.cgi?id=35547 

Comments related to this report
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - 09:10, Wednesday 08 October 2025 (87369)

We swapped the old chassis back in yesterday, after Fil replaced the fan last week.

H1 SUS
filiberto.clara@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:31, Tuesday 30 September 2025 - last comment - 15:59, Monday 13 October 2025(87225)
Sat Amps Modified: PR2 and SR2

WP 12813
ECR E2400330
Modified List T2500232

The following SUS SAT Amps were upgraded per ECR E2400330. Modification improves the whitening stage to reduce ADC noise from 0.05 to 10 Hz.

Suspension Old New OSEM
PR2 M2 S1100174 S1100159 ULLLURLR
PR2 M3 S1100093 S1100141 ULLLURLR
SR2 M2 S1100169 S1100070 ULLLURLR
SR2 M3 S1100134 S1000295 ULLLURLR

F. Clara, J. Kissel, O. Patane

Comments related to this report
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - 15:21, Thursday 02 October 2025 (87237)

(Since Jeff is out of town, I'm putting these in for these swaps.)

Here's the characterization data and fit results for S1100159, assigned to PR2 M2's ULLLURLR OSEMs.

This sat amp is a UK 4CH sat amp, D0900900 / D0901284.

The data was taken per methods described in T080062-v3, using the diagrammatic setup shown on PAGE 1 of the Measurement Diagrams from LHO:86807.

The data was processed and fit using
    ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Scripts/
         plotresponse_S1100159_PR2_M2_ULLLURLR_20250924.m

Explicitly, the fit to the whitening stage zero and pole, the transimpedance feedback resistor, and foton design string are
Optic    Stage    Serial_Number    Channel_Number     OSEM_Name    Zero_Pole_Hz    R_TIA_kOhm    Foton_Design
PR2      M2       S1100159         CH1                UL           0.0956:5.22      120.25    "zpk([5.22],[0.0956],1,""n"")"
                                   CH2                LL           0.0967:5.28      120       "zpk([5.28],[0.0967],1,""n"")"
                                   CH3                UR           0.0978:5.34      120       "zpk([5.34],[0.0978],1,""n"")"
                                   CH4                LR           0.0969:5.3       120       "zpk([5.3],[0.0969],1,""n"")"
                                   
  
The attached plot and machine readable .txt file version of the above table are also found in
    ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Results/

Per usual, R_TIA_kOhm is not used in the compensation filter -- but after ruling out an adjustment in the zero frequency (by zeroing the phase residual at the lowest few frequency points), I nudged the transimpedance a bit to get the magnitude scale within the ~0.25%. shown in the attached results. Any scaling like this will be accounted for instead with the absolute calibration step, i.e. Side Quest 4 from G2501621, a la what was done for PR3 and SR3 top masses in LHO:86222 and LHO:84531 respectively.
Non-image files attached to this comment
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - 15:19, Thursday 02 October 2025 (87262)

(Since Jeff is out of town, I'm putting these in for these swaps.)

Here's the characterization data and fit results for S1100141, assigned to PR2 M3's ULLLURLR OSEMs.

This sat amp is a UK 4CH sat amp, D0900900 / D0901284.

The data was taken per methods described in T080062-v3, using the diagrammatic setup shown on PAGE 1 of the Measurement Diagrams from LHO:86807.

The data was processed and fit using
    ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Scripts/
         plotresponse_S1100141_PR2_M3_ULLLURLR_20250924.m

Explicitly, the fit to the whitening stage zero and pole, the transimpedance feedback resistor, and foton design string are
Optic    Stage    Serial_Number    Channel_Number     OSEM_Name    Zero_Pole_Hz    R_TIA_kOhm    Foton_Design
PR2      M3       S1100141         CH1                UL           0.0957:5.22    120.25    "zpk([5.22],[0.0957],1,""n"")"
                                   CH2                LL           0.0949:5.17    120.5    "zpk([5.17],[0.0949],1,""n"")"
                                   CH3                UR           0.0977:5.33    120.375    "zpk([5.33],[0.0977],1,""n"")"
                                   CH4                LR           0.0946:5.16    120.25    "zpk([5.16],[0.0946],1,""n"")"
                                   
  
The attached plot and machine readable .txt file version of the above table are also found in
    ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Results/

Per usual, R_TIA_kOhm is not used in the compensation filter -- but after ruling out an adjustment in the zero frequency (by zeroing the phase residual at the lowest few frequency points), I nudged the transimpedance a bit to get the magnitude scale within the ~0.25%. shown in the attached results. Any scaling like this will be accounted for instead with the absolute calibration step, i.e. Side Quest 4 from G2501621, a la what was done for PR3 and SR3 top masses in LHO:86222 and LHO:84531 respectively.
Non-image files attached to this comment
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - 15:24, Thursday 02 October 2025 (87263)

(Since Jeff is out of town, I'm putting these in for these swaps.)

Here's the characterization data and fit results for S1100070, assigned to SR2 M2's ULLLURLR OSEMs.

This sat amp is a UK 4CH sat amp, D0900900 / D0901284.

The data was taken per methods described in T080062-v3, using the diagrammatic setup shown on PAGE 1 of the Measurement Diagrams from LHO:86807.

The data was processed and fit using
    ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Scripts/
         plotresponse_S1100070_SR2_M2_ULLLURLR_20250924.m

Explicitly, the fit to the whitening stage zero and pole, the transimpedance feedback resistor, and foton design string are
Optic    Stage    Serial_Number    Channel_Number     OSEM_Name    Zero_Pole_Hz    R_TIA_kOhm    Foton_Design
SR2      M2       S1100070         CH1                UL           0.0961:5.24    120.25    "zpk([5.24],[0.0961],1,""n"")"
                                   CH2                LL           0.0965:5.27    120.375    "zpk([5.27],[0.0965],1,""n"")"
                                   CH3                UR           0.0961:5.23    120.5    "zpk([5.23],[0.0961],1,""n"")"
                                   CH4                LR           0.0963:5.26    120.75    "zpk([5.26],[0.0963],1,""n"")"
                                   
  
The attached plot and machine readable .txt file version of the above table are also found in
    ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Results/

Per usual, R_TIA_kOhm is not used in the compensation filter -- but after ruling out an adjustment in the zero frequency (by zeroing the phase residual at the lowest few frequency points), I nudged the transimpedance a bit to get the magnitude scale within the ~0.25%. shown in the attached results. Any scaling like this will be accounted for instead with the absolute calibration step, i.e. Side Quest 4 from G2501621, a la what was done for PR3 and SR3 top masses in LHO:86222 and LHO:84531 respectively.
Non-image files attached to this comment
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - 15:26, Thursday 02 October 2025 (87264)

(Since Jeff is out of town, I'm putting these in for these swaps.)

Here's the characterization data and fit results for S1000295, assigned to SR2 M3's ULLLURLR OSEMs.

This sat amp is a UK 4CH sat amp, D0900900 / D0901284.

The data was taken per methods described in T080062-v3, using the diagrammatic setup shown on PAGE 1 of the Measurement Diagrams from LHO:86807.

The data was processed and fit using
    ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Scripts/
         plotresponse_S1000295_SR2_M3_ULLLURLR_20250924.m

Explicitly, the fit to the whitening stage zero and pole, the transimpedance feedback resistor, and foton design string are
Optic    Stage    Serial_Number    Channel_Number     OSEM_Name    Zero_Pole_Hz    R_TIA_kOhm    Foton_Design
SR2      M3       S1000295         CH1                UL           0.0964:5.27    121.75    "zpk([5.27],[0.0964],1,""n"")"
                                   CH2                LL           0.0954:5.21    121.625    "zpk([5.21],[0.0954],1,""n"")"
                                   CH3                UR           0.0955:5.22    121.375    "zpk([5.22],[0.0955],1,""n"")"
                                   CH4                LR           0.0964:5.26    122    "zpk([5.26],[0.0964],1,""n"")"
                                   
  
The attached plot and machine readable .txt file version of the above table are also found in
    ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Results/

Per usual, R_TIA_kOhm is not used in the compensation filter -- but after ruling out an adjustment in the zero frequency (by zeroing the phase residual at the lowest few frequency points), I nudged the transimpedance a bit to get the magnitude scale within the ~0.25%. shown in the attached results. Any scaling like this will be accounted for instead with the absolute calibration step, i.e. Side Quest 4 from G2501621, a la what was done for PR3 and SR3 top masses in LHO:86222 and LHO:84531 respectively.
Non-image files attached to this comment
LHO VE
jordan.vanosky@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:45, Tuesday 23 September 2025 - last comment - 10:43, Wednesday 01 October 2025(87101)
HAM6 Annulus Ion Pump (AIP) Replacement

During Tuesday maintenance, we swapped the HAM6 AIP (Starcell). Note this annulus system is connected to HAM5 via the septum plate. We vented the lines with dry nitrogen and left a continuous nitrogen purge(~.3 psi) of the line during the pump swap. Nitrogen attached to HAM5 pump out port while HAM6 pump out port was left open to atmosphere.

No issues during the swap, annulus system is now pumping at both HAM5 & 6 ports with an aux cart and turbo pair. As of end of maintenance, the HAM6 cart was at ~3E-5 Torr, HAM5 cart at ~1E-4 Torr. These pumps will continue running until pressure is <1E-5 Torr at which point the ion pumps will be powered on.

Carts are placed on foam for isolation, and a piece of foam between the flex hose running up to HAM6 pump out port and HAM6 chamber. See attached pictures. 

Work permit will be closed once pumps are disconnected from chambers.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
gerardo.moreno@LIGO.ORG - 17:10, Wednesday 24 September 2025 (87132)DetChar, VE

Update.

IFO was out of lock due to an earthquake, I went in to the LVEA to check on the aux-carts pumping down on the annuli for HAM5 and HAM6.  HAM5 aux-cart was good and pumping down on the annulus, however HAM6 aux-cart safety valve somehow managed to trip between yesterday and today, time is unknown as of now, I restored aux cart, and opened the valve.  Aux-cart for HAM6 was reporting a dubious pressure number of 1.26 x 10-07 Torr.

After restoring pumping to HAM6 annulus, both aux carts are reporting more believable numbers.

Images attached to this comment
gerardo.moreno@LIGO.ORG - 10:43, Wednesday 01 October 2025 (87245)VE

(Jordan, TJ, Gerardo)

Late entry.

TJ powered ON the ion pumps over the weekend, that allowed for the pumps to reach very good vacuum pressure on the shared annuli system, then on Tuesday morning, Jordan isolated the annuli system for HAM5 and HAM6 from the mechanical pumps and turned off the aux carts.

A couple of hours later we removed the small can turbos, flex hoses and aux carts from the HAM5/6 area, to conclude the replacement of the HAM5 annulus ion pump body.

 

 

Images attached to this comment
Displaying reports 981-1000 of 85743.Go to page Start 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 End