Displaying reports 10321-10340 of 84772.Go to page Start 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 End
Reports until 12:06, Monday 25 March 2024
H1 ISC
jennifer.wright@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:06, Monday 25 March 2024 - last comment - 12:29, Monday 25 March 2024(76683)
A2L Steps

Jennie W, Sheila, Camilla

I looked at the results of the A2L tests from the weekend for ETMY, ITMX and ETMX.

For ETMY the steps seem too small / A2L gain changing has little effect on the power recycling (LSC-POP-A and ASC-POP_NSUM), build-ups (ASC-{X,Y}_PWR), range (MPC range channel and BLRMS channels) or optical gain (KAPPA C). See first image.

 

More of a difference can be seen in the arm build-ups and PRG for ETMX. The best value for P2L looks like 4.4 as this maxmises the arm power and PRG, while the best range is for a Y2L of 4.6. See second image.

Y2L gains for ITMX seem to already be at their optimised value in terms of arm build-ups and power recycling, however the range improved slightly when the P2L gain was at  -0.4. See third image.

 

In summary maybe we need to retune ETMX and ITMX A2L gains a bit, but for ETMY it doesn't seem to gain us much.


See comment from Elenna below, we will run these again as per this entry.

 

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
elenna.capote@LIGO.ORG - 12:29, Monday 25 March 2024 (76687)

I am not sure the results of these tests are telling us what we think they should. The camera servos were running during this test, not the ADS. Therefore, changing the A2L gains would only change the mirror actuation point, while the camera servo would continue to servo the same offset set by the ADS convergence during lock acquisition. This means that the spot stayed static on the mirror while the mirror actuation point changed. In this sense, the buildups shouldn't really tell us anything, since the spot was not moving. However, the noise may change during this test if we are changing some alignment coupling.

If we truly want to move the spots around to look for better buildups, we should either make a test that adjusts the camera servo offset value, or turn on the ADS when the A2L gains are changed.

H1 SQZ (SQZ)
nutsinee.kijbunchoo@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:26, Monday 25 March 2024 - last comment - 14:16, Monday 25 March 2024(76681)
OPO failed to lock due to green launch power was too high

Sheila, Daniel, Naoki, Nutsinee

 

This morning OPO failed to lock because our green launch power was too high. As of this morning the OPO guardian will take itself to DOWN when the power reaches above 35mW. Though this doesn't stop SQZ_MANAGER from re-requesting OPO to lock even if the pump ISS fails repeatedly (because SHG launch power was too high). Daniel also cranked up the OPO PZT offset to 10V using CLF slow offset to lower the lock point of the OPO PZT.

 

We made a few rough adjustments to the OPO guaridan:

1) In the ENGAGE_PUMP_ISS if ISS fails up to 20 times it will take itself to DOWN.  Injecting squeezing with no pump ISS means bad squeezing. Squeeze level will drift. Squeeze angle will drift. We shouldn't inject bad squeezing into the interferometer.

2) If the SHG launch power is higher than 35mW the flipper will close and the guardian will take itself to DOWN. The point of this statement is to protect the fiber. We should close the flipper.

3) We added two functions and two GuardStateDecorator.  GRLAUNCH checker lives in DOWN state and @ISS_checker lives in PRE_LOCK_CLF. If SQZ_MANAGER tries to take OPO to lock when these bad conditions are still true, OPO will refuse to go up and stays in DOWN.

 

The code has been loaded into the OPO Guardian. We still see to make SQZ_MANAGER put out nofification as well. For now the notifications live in the OPO guardian.

 

 

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
daniel.sigg@LIGO.ORG - 14:16, Monday 25 March 2024 (76688)

The OPO second PZT was set to +10V (using the CLF_SLOW offset) which reduces the required voltage on the first PZT somewhat.

Images attached to this comment
H1 CAL (CDS, FRS)
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:18, Monday 25 March 2024 - last comment - 08:19, Tuesday 26 March 2024(76682)
A few EPICs channels added to top-level CAL-CS Front-end model
J. Kissel, L. Dartez
ECR E2400103
IIET 30760
WP 11786

To better coordinate and confirm the front end portion of the calibration pipeline and the GDS portion running on the DMT machines remain in sync in terms of calibration model installed, which is necessary for good calibration, we are adding two slow 16 Hz EPICS channels to the h1/l1calcs models (so both LLO and LHO) that will be added to the GDS broadcaster list so the GDS calibration pipeline can read them. These are H1/L1:CAL-CALIB_REPORT_ID_INT and H1/L1:CAL-CALIB_REPORT_HASH_INT.

Louis and I created the top-level EPICs records today; see attached screenshot.

The change has been committed to the userapps SVN under:
    /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/cal/h1/models/
        h1calcs.mdl          committed at rev 27307.


It's in no way a complicated add to the model, but I've ran a test compile of the h1calcs.mdl on the build machine anyways just to check. The test compiled succeeded without issue.
Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 08:19, Tuesday 26 March 2024 (76704)CAL, CDS
J. Kissel

This model changes have been installed this morning. As such, I've updated the safe.snap SDF system to initialize the H1:CAL-CALIB_REPORT_ID_INT and H1:CAL-CALIB_REPORT_HASH_INT channels. I've also chosen to monitor them, since we don't expect them to change during observation, and/or regulary, and this information will become critical for calibration librarianship.
Images attached to this comment
LHO VE
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:13, Monday 25 March 2024 (76679)
Mon CP1 Fill

Mon Mar 25 10:09:43 2024 INFO: Fill completed in 9min 39secs

Jordan confirmed a good fill curbside.

Images attached to this report
H1 ISC
gabriele.vajente@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:57, Monday 25 March 2024 (76678)
Coherences averaged over 2 hours

I used two hours of quiet data over the weekend to compute coherences of DARM with all channels with a bandwidth of 0.5 Hz, meaning about 7200 averages. The goal was to look for coherences in the high frequency (>100 Hz). Nothing there except residual jitter coherence (I'm using GDS-CALIB_STRAIN_CLEAN)

https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~gabriele.vajente/bruco_1395364856_GDS_CALIB/

Same time period, with a bandwidth of 0.1 Hz, and about 1800 averages

https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~gabriele.vajente/bruco_1395364856_GDS_CALIB_0.1Hz/

Notable at low frequency: CHARD_P, CHARD_Y, DHARD_Y, SRCL

H1 ISC
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:46, Monday 25 March 2024 (76677)
dark noise measured

Ryan took the IMC offline after a lockloss so that we could measure dark noise.  The attachment shows that there is a change in the location of the lump from 40Hz to 60Hz.  Jeff pointed me to this alog: 68377 where he previously saw this moving around.

Other than that, there is little change in the dark noise, if anythingit is slightly better now than before the OMC swap from 100-300Hz.

This is in the Noise budget repo: /ligo/gitcommon/NoiseBudget/aligoNB/aligoNB/H1/couplings/Reference_noises.xml

 

Images attached to this report
H1 AOS
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:40, Monday 25 March 2024 (76674)
Range ASD Today compared with December 20th

Now we have improved low frequecny, I've attached a new version of the H1 summary pages range ASD plot from 76349, comparing December 20th 2023 in Red (SQZ/noSQZ in 76537) to  March 25th today in green  (25th March).

 Everything below 40Hz is better than December. Everything 40 -500Hz is worse

Images attached to this report
H1 PSL
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:01, Monday 25 March 2024 (76673)
PSL 10-Day Trends

FAMIS 20021

PMC_TRANS and FSS_TPD have been dropping over the past several days while PMC_REFL has been rising.

Images attached to this report
H1 General (TCS)
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:54, Monday 25 March 2024 (76672)
TCS Chiller Water Level Top-Off FAMIS

Previously done 76151 - closes FAMIS#27785

TCSX was at 29.5, so I added 290mL of water to get it to 30.

TCSY was still at max, so I did not add any water.

There was no leaking.

LHO General (SQZ)
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:17, Monday 25 March 2024 (76671)
Ops Day Shift Start

TITLE: 03/25 Day Shift: 15:00-23:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Lock Acquisition
OUTGOING OPERATOR: None
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: CALM
    Wind: 2mph Gusts, 0mph 5min avg
    Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.35 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY: H1 has now been locked at NLN for 32 hours. SQZ just unlocked (looks the the OPO PZT railed), Sheila and I are debugging.

H1 General
anthony.sanchez@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:02, Monday 25 March 2024 (76670)
Sunday Eve

TITLE: 03/25 Eve Shift: 23:00-07:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 149Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: (None) Remote txt2 Sheila.
SHIFT SUMMARY:
H1 has now been locked for 24 hours!
Currently Observing after surviving a few mag 5 earthquakes.
Quiet night, everything seems to be running smoothly!

LOG:
No Log

 

H1 General
anthony.sanchez@LIGO.ORG - posted 23:16, Sunday 24 March 2024 - last comment - 09:29, Monday 25 March 2024(76669)
Vibrometer HVAC Fans Health check

FAMIS 26289
Out side of that glitch I dont see an increase in noise on any of the fans.

Zooming in on the Glitches I found that the glitches were minutes apart and not actually at the same time yesterday.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - 09:29, Monday 25 March 2024 (76675)

Tagging facilities. I agree that nothing looks to be too noisy or getting worse, but these might be good for them to keep an eye on.

H1 General
anthony.sanchez@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:23, Sunday 24 March 2024 (76668)
Sunday Ops Eve Shift Start

TITLE: 03/24 Eve Shift: 23:00-07:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 146Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Ryan S
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: CALM
    Wind: 13mph Gusts, 11mph 5min avg
    Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.23 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
H1 Is locked an Observing for 16.5 hours.
H1:PEM-CS_DUST_PSL101                    Error: data set contains 'not-a-number' (NaN) entries

All three IFO's are locked and Observing.
Everything looks good.

 

LHO General
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:01, Sunday 24 March 2024 (76666)
Ops Day Shift Summary

TITLE: 03/24 Day Shift: 15:00-23:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 150Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Tony
SHIFT SUMMARY:

LOG:

No log for this shift.

H1 CAL
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:42, Sunday 24 March 2024 (76667)
Broadband and Simulines Calibration Sweeps

Following instructions from the TakingCalibrationMeasurements wiki, this afternoon I ran both broadband PCal and Simulines measurements.

Broadband PCal (approximate) start time:
PDT: 2024-03-24 14:05:00 PDT
UTC: 2024-03-24 21:05:00 UTC
GPS: 1395349518
 
Simulines start time:
PDT: 2024-03-24 14:12:40.535159 PDT
UTC: 2024-03-24 21:12:40.535159 UTC
GPS: 1395349978.535159
 
Files written:
2024-03-24 21:34:11,594 | INFO | File written out to: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/DARMOLG_SS/DARMOLG_SS_20240324T211241Z.hdf5
2024-03-24 21:34:11,602 | INFO | File written out to: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/PCALY2DARM_SS/PCALY2DARM_SS_20240324T211241Z.hdf5
2024-03-24 21:34:11,609 | INFO | File written out to: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/SUSETMX_L1_SS/SUSETMX_L1_SS_20240324T211241Z.hdf5
2024-03-24 21:34:11,614 | INFO | File written out to: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/SUSETMX_L2_SS/SUSETMX_L2_SS_20240324T211241Z.hdf5
2024-03-24 21:34:11,619 | INFO | File written out to: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/SUSETMX_L3_SS/SUSETMX_L3_SS_20240324T211241Z.hdf5
 
Calibration monitor medm screenshot attached.
Images attached to this report
LHO VE
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:32, Sunday 24 March 2024 (76664)
Sun CP1 Fill

Sun Mar 24 10:11:41 2024 INFO: Fill completed in 11min 37secs

Images attached to this report
H1 ISC (OpsInfo)
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:31, Friday 22 March 2024 - last comment - 14:13, Sunday 24 March 2024(76630)
A2L stepper scripts to run over the weekend, ETMY 6am tomorrow

Code located in /ligo/gitcommon/labutils/beam_spot_raster/a2l_gain_stepper.py

Current spot positions (e.g. H1:SUS-ITMX_L2_DRIVEALIGN_P2L_SPOT_GAIN):

Optic P2L Y2L
ITMX -0.8 2.1
ITMY 0 -1.9
ETMX 4 4.4
ETMY 4.6 3.2

It will step the nominal values up and down 0.4 in 0.2 steps / 15 minutes. e.g. starting a2l + [-0.2, -0.4, -0.2, 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.2, 0]

I've set up a script to run this on ETMY at 6am to 10am tomorrow (23rd) in a tmux session on cdsws26, will only run if the IFO is at NLN (>=600)  at 6am.

Ryan S will try to find times (4 hours each) to run this on the other optics ITMX and ETMX over the weekend, command below. We don't have beam spot control on ITMY so can skip that.

>> python /ligo/gitcommon/labutils/beam_spot_raster/a2l_gain_stepper.py ETMY --start 'now'

Comments related to this report
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - 15:22, Saturday 23 March 2024 (76656)ISC, OpsInfo

The ETMY A2L stepper script made it about 3/4 of the way through today; output in alog76655. We can find a time to re-run this if we need the full sweep.

Since there won't be time today before the end of commissioning allotment, I've set the A2L script to run for ETMX tomorrow morning at 06:00 PDT in the same tmux session on cdsws26.

ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - 14:13, Sunday 24 March 2024 (76665)ISC

Today I ran the A2L gain stepper scripts for ETMX and ITMX. The ETMX steps ran from 13:00 to 17:00 UTC and the ITMX steps ran from 17:03 to 21:03 UTC.

Images attached to this comment
H1 SUS
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:47, Wednesday 20 March 2024 - last comment - 09:43, Monday 25 March 2024(76545)
Model updates for USER DACKILL w/ better Watchdogs con't: ITMs and BS

Oli P, Jeff K

As a continuation of the SUS model updates (76269), yesterday I updated the models, medms, and watchdog filter banks for the ITMs and BS. Everything looks to be functioning as intended. Changes made are basically the same as what was done for the ETMs and TMSs, with the exception of the pi model for the ITMs(attachment1). I will list the model files that have changed:
SUS
- QUAD_ITM_MASTER.mdl
- h1susitmx.mdl
- h1susitmy.mdl
- h1susitmpi.mdl
- BSFM_MASTER.mdl
- h1susbs.mdl
ISI
- h1isiitmx.mdl
- h1isiitmy.mdl
- h1isibs.mdl
The OVERVIEW and WD medm files have been updated for each suspension, there has been the addition of a new filter bank within the WD screen to accomodate for the addition of the RMSLP put into the WD models, and these filters, along with the BANDLIM filter banks, have been updated with the correct filters. SDFs have been accepted for safe(attachment2) and OBSERVE(attachment3). All changes are in svn.

SUS Type Updated?
QUAD ETM 76269
QUAD ITM this alog
BSFM this alog
HLTS  
HSTS  
TMTS 76269
OMCS  
HSDS  
HPDS  
HDDS  
HTDS  
OFIS  
OPOS  
HAUX  
HTTS  
Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 09:43, Monday 25 March 2024 (76676)
J. Kissel, O. Patane

Oli and I reviewed their work on this upgrade and it looks great. We did see a few oversights that we corrected this morning:
    (1) Set the H1 SUS M1 and M2 thresholds to (still arbitrary) 100 and 200 [um_RMS], respectively, in the 0.1 to 10 Hz region (see 1st attachment)
    (2) Turned on the H1 SUS M2 stage calibration, which had been installed, but just not turned on. (see 2nd Attachment)

We've accepted these changes in the SDF system.
Images attached to this comment
H1 CAL
anthony.sanchez@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:19, Tuesday 19 March 2024 - last comment - 21:34, Sunday 24 March 2024(76524)
PCAL EY End Station & Lab Measurements, and Temperature Channel inquirey

A PCAL End station measurement was performed at End Y today. Analysis Pending.

Also Fil and I went back to EY to test the PCAL Temperature channels.
This time Fil and I went down and Turn ON the PCAL enclosure bypass and then pulled the PCAL cable out of the back of the PCAL Enclosure bypass Chassis.

GPS Time 1394909058

The ndscope of these channels did not appear any cleaner when we unplugged the PCAL cable out of the back of the PCAL Enclosure bypass Chassis.
The ndscope of these channels did not appear any cleaner when we unplugged the Rx Module Temperature cable from the front of the PCAL Chassis. But the Rx Temp did go to 0.
The ndscope of these channels did not appear any cleaner when we unplugged the Tx module Temperature cable from the front of the PCAL Chassis. But Tx Temp did go to 0. 

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
anthony.sanchez@LIGO.ORG - 21:34, Sunday 24 March 2024 (76648)

A PCAL End Station Measurement was done on the Spring Equinox (Mar 19th 2024), the PCAL team( Dripta B. & Tony S.) went to ENDY with Working Standard Hanford aka WSH(PS4) and took an End station measurements.
The ENDY Station Measurement was carried out according to the procedure outlined in Document LIGO-T1500062-v15, Pcal End Station Power Sensor Responsivity Ratio Measurements: Procedures and Log, and was completed by 10:30 am.


Measurement Log

First thing we did is take a picture of the beam spot before anything is touched!
On this particular trip I not only took a pic of the beam spot on the Rx Sensor, but I took pictures of the viewport that the PCAL beams come out of on the Rx side. I was hoping to just document where the beams can be seen on the glass. As you can see there is a surprising amount of light on the flange that hold the viewport glass. This light seems to be a reflection from the optics we have in the RX enclosure. I was able to identify which beam on the glass is which. Please see my cartoonish diagram on the back of the Log document above for more details.


Martel:
Martel Voltage source applies voltage into the PCAL Chassis's Input 1 channel. We record the GPStimes that a -4.000V, -2.000V and a 0.000V voltage was applied to the Channel. This can be seen in Martel_Voltage_Test.png . We also did a measurement of the Martel's voltages in the PCAL lab to calculate the ADC conversion factor, which is included on the above document.

Plots while the Working Standard(PS4) is in the Transmitter Module during Inner beam being blocked, then the outer beam being block, followed by the background measurment: WS_at_TX.png.

The Inner, outer, and background measurement while WS in the Receiver Module: WS_at_RX.png.

The Inner, outer, and background measurement while RX Sphere is in the RX enclosure, which is our nominal set up without the WS in the beam path at all.:  TX_RX.png.

The last picture is of the Beam spots after we had finished the measurement.


All of this data is then used to generate LHO_ENDY_PD_ReportV2.pdf which is attached, and a work in progress in the form of a living document.


End Station data and Analysis has been commited to the SVN :
https://svn.ligo.caltech.edu/svn/aligocalibration/trunk/Projects/PhotonCalibrator/measurements/LHO_ENDY/


PCAL Lab Responsivity Ratio Measurement:
A WSH/GSHL (PS4/PS5)FrontBack Responsivity Ratio Measurement was ran, analyzed, and pushed to the SVN.
The analysis of this measurement produces 4 PDF files which we use to vet the data for problems.
raw_voltages.pdf
avg_voltages.pdf
raw_ratios.pdf
avg_ratios.pdf

 

Obligitory BackFront PS4/PS5 Responsivity Ratio:
PCAL Lab Responsivity Ratio Measurement:
A WSH/GSHL (PS4/PS5)BF Responsivity Ratio measurement was ran, analyzed, and pushed to the SVN.
The analysis of this measurement produces 4 PDF files which we use to vet the data for problems.
raw_voltages2.pdf
avg_voltages2.pdf
raw_ratios2.pdf
avg_ratios2.pdf

Lab data and analysis can be found here:
https://svn.ligo.caltech.edu/svn/aligocalibration/trunk/Projects/PhotonCalibrator/measurements/LabData/PS4_PS5/

This adventure has been brought to you by Dripta B. & Tony Sanchez.

 

Images attached to this comment
Non-image files attached to this comment
Displaying reports 10321-10340 of 84772.Go to page Start 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 End