TITLE: 02/13 Day Shift: 16:00-00:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
OUTGOING OPERATOR: None
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
SEI_ENV state: CALM
Wind: 3mph Gusts, 1mph 5min avg
Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.25 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
Workstations updated and rebooted. This was an OS package update. Conda packages were not updated.
Today's activities: - The Corner pumpdown has been started. After 5h50min pumping, we are at 250 Torr - HAM6 / HAM5 common Annulus volume is now pumped also with the Ion pumps, they are at the mid-E-6 Torr range - EX pumping status: 4.65E-8 Torr - EX RGA bakeout has been ramped down; it is now ready for a post-vent RGA scan - HAM8 RGA is being pumped. The HAM8 turbo pump has also been started up, they are now ready to be valved in and for a pre-vent RGA scan, although there are issues, see here: https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=75814
WP 11689
The field cabling to the SQZT8 enclosure are now disconnected. Part of the safety interlock system was moved away from the table (Beckhoff 1908 field box). This required the door & panel status cable to be disconnected. Safety MEDM is showing SQZT8 in a fault (panels and doors open). FCES E-stop button is still active.
TITLE: 02/12 Day Shift: 16:00-00:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
INCOMING OPERATOR: None
SHIFT SUMMARY: The HAM7 doors are ready to be put back on, the CS pumpdown has begun, and EndX & HAM8 are being prepped to be vented.
17:59UTC SUS ZM5 WD trip, LVEA RED pressure alarm 18:30UTC, a few PSL anteroom yellow dust alarms throughout the morning/early afternoon then several red alarms around 22-23UTC.
21:12UTC ISI HAM7 WD trip, maybe from Gerardo turning down the purge air? ISI HAM5 & 7 tripped a few minutes later 21:18UTC and the motion was too high to untrip for a bit (~ 4 minutes), probably from the VAC teams work, sudden changes in pressure? Tagging VE, SEI. They retripped 2 minutes after I reset them after the motion look like it had calmed down. I'm going to leave them tripped for now.
21:51UTC the CS pumpdown started!
LOG:
Start Time | System | Name | Location | Lazer_Haz | Task | Time End |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
15:30 | FAC | Kim & Karen | LVEA | N | Tech clean | 16:16 |
16:04 | FAC | Contractors | EndY then X | N | Crane inspection | 19:07 |
16:16 | FAC | Ken | LVEA | N | Check pump | 17:41 |
16:58 | VAC | Travis | LVEA | N | Vac checks | 17:17 |
17:15 | SUS | Rahul | LVEA, HAM7 | N | HAM7 checks | 18:35 |
17:17 | VAC | Travis | EndX | N | Check on RGA | 17:50 |
17:28 | EE | Fil | LVEA, mech rm | N | HAM7 grounding checks, SUS to SAFE HAM7 | 19:40 |
17:40 | Camilla, Betsy | HAM7 | N | Closeout work, Betsy out @ 17:51UTC | 17:54 | |
17:50 | VAC | Gerardo | LVEA | N | Check viewports are covered, pumpdown prep | 19:09 |
17:50 | EE | Ken | EndX then LSB | N | Lights | 23:23 |
17:53 | FAC | Karen | LVEA | n | Tech clean | 18:12 |
18:00 | VAC | Jordan | LVEA | N | Join Gerardo | 19:09 |
18:31 | VAC | Travis | EndX | N | RGA | 23:11 |
18:34 | FAC | Karen | EndY | N | Tech clean | 19:41 |
18:38 | FAC | Richard | LVEA | N | Talk with Vac & Fil | 19:38 |
18:43 | SUS | Rahul | LVEA | N | Check with Fil | 18:48 |
19:01 | SUS | Rahul | LVEA, HAM7 | N | Adjust BOSEM flag | 19:15 |
19:17 | SEI | Jim | LVEA, HAM7 | N | unlock ISI | 19:47 |
19:17 | SQZ | Camilla | LVEA | N | Check beam diverter | 19:49 |
19:47 | FAC | Chris + contractors | LVEA | N | Crane inspection | 19:57 |
19:48 | FAC | Tyler | FCES | N | Check equipment | 19:50 |
19:48 | SEI | Jim | CR | N | HAM7 transfer functions | 20:32 |
19:49 | SQZ | Camilla & Julien | FCES | N | Check SQZT8 | 20:43 |
20:36 | SUS | Rahul | CR | N | SUS H7 transfer functions | 22:36 |
20:53 | SEI | Jim | EX, EY | N | EX - check BRS, EY - wind fence | 23:13 |
21:07 | VAC | Jordan | LVEA | N | Prep for pumpdown | 21:51 |
21:11 | VAC | Gerardo | LVEA | N | Join Jordan | 21:51 |
21:51 | VAC | Garardo, Janos, Jordan | LVEA | N | Start CS pumpdown (excluding HAM7), Gerardo out 23:10UTC | Ongoing |
23:23 | EE | Ken | EndX | N | Move lift from EndX to EndY | Ongoing |
23:26 | EE | Fil | FCES | N | Disconnect SQZT8 | Ongoing |
HAM7 doors can be now closed since all the suspensions in the chamber are healthy as per the latest measurements I took this afternoon.
Attached below are the results for ZM1-5, FC1 and OPO suspensions.
Julian, Camilla
Prior to the SQZT8 ISC table move, Julian and I marked the current position of the corners of the table with red crosses using a plumb-bob.
We attached loose optics and cables and cable tied a loose electronic box. We placed some filters and the camera covers in a small plastic bag and secured to the table. There is an accelerometer inside not yet plugged in.
D2000202 A+ SUS HAM 7 System Wiring Diagram
T1200131 Grounding and Shielding at LIGO
D1900511 ISC/SQZ Wiring Diagram
Ground loop checks for HAM7 complete. No issues to report. Some cables previously modified per E2100504. Other don’t have Pin 13 and shield tied per T1200131. See alog 65129 for more details.
A list of cable tested:
Description | Cable | Location | |
FC1 TOP | SUS_FC1_001 | SUS-R4 | |
FC1 TOP | SUS_FC1_002 | SUS-R4 | |
FC1 MIDDLE | SUS_FC1_003 | SUS-R4 | |
FC1 Bottom | SUS_FC1_004 | SUS-R4 | |
VOPO | SUS_OPO_001 | SUS-R4 | |
VOPO | SUS_OPO_002 | SUS-R4 | |
ZM1-M1 | SUS_ZM1_001 | SUS-R4 | |
ZM1-M2 Dither | SUS_ZM1_006 | SUS-M1 | |
ZM2-M1 | SUS_ZM2_001 | SUS-R4 | |
ZM2-M2 PSAMS | AWC_ZM2_006 | SQZ-R1 | |
ZM3-M1 | SUS_ZM3_001 | SUS-R4 | |
ZM3 M2 Dither | SUS_ZM3_006 | SUS-M1 | |
ZM4-M1 | SUS_ZM4_001 | SUS-R4 | |
ZM4-M2 PSAMS | AWC_ZM4_006 | SQZ-R1 | |
ZM5-M1 | SUS_SQ_002 | SUS-R4 | |
ZM5-M2 PSAMS | AWC_ZM5_006 | SQZ-R1 | |
Oven Trans/Cav Piezo | ISC_SQ_303 | SQZ-R2 | |
SQZ Thermistor & TEC | ISC_SQ_304 | SQZ-R2 | |
SQZ DCPD & LENS Trans | ISC_SQ_305 | SQZ-R2 | |
Picomotor | ISC_SQ_470 | ISCT7 | |
Picomotor | ISC-SQ_471 | ISCT7 | |
SQZ-FC_QPD_A | ISC_SQ_479 | SQZ-R1 | |
SQZ-FC_QPD_B | ISC_SQ_480 | SQZ-R1 | |
OFI2 | ISC_SQ_482 | SQZ-R2 | |
SF1 | ISC_SQ_483 | SQZ-R2 | |
SF2 | ISC_SQ_484 | SQZ-R2 |
HAM7 ISI is unlocked. Tfs look normal for this chamber, no rebalance was needed, so I think we are good to close.
Given below are the list of things I did in HAM7 to prepare for the close out of the chamber.
- Took particle counts outside and inside the chamber and they were zero (inside chamber) and few tens (outside chamber).
- Removed the two irises from the chamber and handed it over to Camilla (wrapped and bagged).
- ZM4 & ZM5: checked their pitch adjuster is locked, checked their dog clamps, checked all the EQ stops, centered the BOSEMs and took transfer function measurements - they look good.
- Confirmed that all wiring appears properly secured and is free of the beam path.
- Placed a silicon wafer inside the chamber on the ISI table.
- Removed all tools from the chamber (checked it twice).
- Took pictures - attached below.
Currently Fil is performing ground loop checks and Jim is un-locking the ISI.
We will be ready to put the doors once SEI and SUS transfer function measurements comes out healthy.
Tagging EPO for these HAM7 closeout photos.
As part of the HAM7 close out procedure, Jim and I checked the HAM7 beam diverter opened and closed fine after Fil's ground loop checks.
Rahul has removed the two irises from HAM7.
Closes FAMIS 25978, last checked in alog75608
Script reports that ETMX_ST1_CPSINF_V2 is elevated, not too suprising since EX is being RGAed and pumped down.
The chambers are definetly noisier but thats expected as we're venting and doing the planned vent work
(Randy P., Jordan V., Janos C., Gerardo M.)
We installed two doors on HAM6. +X door went on very smoothly, no problems. -X door we had a small issue with the inner o-ring, did not wanted to stay put, it took some convincing, no new issues to report.
We are currently pumping down the annulus system with two aux carts, thus far the vacuum pressure at the aux carts pumping the AIPs appears nominal.
Tagging EPO for Door install pics.
[Michael, Jim, Tony, Shoshana, Neil] We've spent the week working on installing a remote mass adjusting/balancing system for the End-X BRS. Upon opening the End-X BRS we discovered that it is slightly different than the other BRSs (most likely because it was the first one built, photo 1 below) so we had to get a couple extra parts machined for the parts we brought from UW to fit properly. The hardware has finished being installed (photo 2), and we've run a quick test of the picomotor (Newport 8341-UHV) to make sure it has full range of motion. We've finished closing the BRS up and are now waiting for it to pump down before doing some additional in-vacuum tests. We are writing up some installation and balancing instructions as well as leaving another set of parts, so a remote balancing system can be installed on the other BRS. We assume the End-Y BRS should fit the drawings on the dcc (D1800045), so no additional parts should need to be machined. We are also leaving 16 flexures here with Jim. The pico motor controller chassis was not working, so we are leaving our UW picomotor driver (Newport 8742) here so that the End-X BRS can be adjusted until the chassis is fixed. Once it is fixed the in-air wiring will need to be re-connected to get the motor to the chassis. For now adjusting will have to be done with a laptop at the End-X station, but once hooked up to the chassis, adjustments can be made from the control room.
Yeah! Jim's back will be grateful.
Notes about the design and additional details on the installation are in SEI log 1886 and attachments.
Tagging EPO for these new BRS innards photos.
day 1 (alog 75548), day 2 (alog 75557), day 3 (alog 75575)
HAM7 irises were good
Sheila/Camilla checked the iris position on HAM7 and it was good.
ASC-AS_C whitening gain was increased by 18dB, dark offset was reset
I didn't like that the ASC-AS_C input was so small. Increased the whitening gain by 18dB (from nominal 18dB to 36dB) and reset the dark offset.
Recentered the beam on ASC-AS_C. One thing that was strange was that the ASC-AS_C_NSUM would become MUCH bigger (like a factor of 10) when SRM is misaligned. I was worried that I was looking at a ghost beam. Camilla measured the beam power to be ~1mW out of HAM7 and ~0.7mW into HAM6. When ASC-AS_C was centered, ASC-AS_C_NSUM_OUT became ~0.008 give or take some. Taking the 16dB extra whitening (i.e. a factor of 8) into account, ASC-AS_C_NSUM~0.008 means about 1mW into HAM6, which was in a ballpark, so I convinced myself that the beam on AS_C was good.
HAM6 irises and beam height on OM, the beam was still very low on OM2
At this point OMC QPDs are reasonably centered, so Sheila and Camilla checked the beam position on irises in HAM6.
The beam was OK on the first iris but was a bit low (~2mm) on the iris closer to the OM1.
The beam position on OMs at this point as well as the slider values and max DAC output are listed below (see Camilla's pictures, too). Note that the YAW position in the table is the position of the incoming beam on the mirror measured at some (unknown) distance, it's not on the mirror.
OM1 | OM2 | OM3 | |
Beam height (nominal 4") | 1/8" too high | 1/4" too low | 1/16" too low |
YAW position | 1/8" to +X | 1/32" to -X | Cannot measure |
PIT slider | 430 | 20 | 610 |
YAW slider | 600 | 1300 | -231 |
Max DAC output | 11k | 7k | 9k |
The beam was clearing the input and output hole on the shroud, was cleanly hitting the small OMCR steering mirror by the cage, and was already going to the OMCR diode.
They confirmed that the OMC trans video beam was visible on the viewer card when OMC flashes and it was hitting the steering mirror (but we need a viewport simulator to see if the beam will clear the viewport aperture).
Bringing the beam up higher on OM2
Unfortunately the beam was still very low (~1/4"), however I was able to use OM1 alignment slider to bring the beam up on OM2 and use OM2/3 alignment sliders to still center the OMC QPDs. After this was done, OM2 PIT offset became large but OM1/OM3 offsets became low-ish. This was a very good sign as it's infinitely easier to mechanically tilt OM2 than OM1/OM3 due to superior mechanical design.
Anyway, by doing this, the beam height on OM2 went up by about 1/8" (see Rahul's pictures). It's still too low by 1/8", but bringing the beam up more would mean that OM3 DAC output will become large w/o mechanically relieving, which I didn't want to do, so I decided to stay here.
OM1 | OM2 | OM3 | |
Beam height | 1/8" too high (didn't measure, no reason to suspect that it changed) | 1/8" too low | 1/16" too low |
PIT slider | 20 | 2710 | -590 |
YAW slider | 650 | 660 | 60 |
Max DAC output | 7.2k | 21k | 7.1k |
Mechanically relieving the OM2 PIT offset
Julian set the OM2 PIT slider gain to 0.75 (from 1), Rahul turned the balance mass screw on the upper mass of OM2 to compensate. We repeated the same thing four times (slider gain 0.75->0.5->0.25->0, each step followed by Rahul's mechanical adjustment). We had to adjust OM2 Y slider in the process to bring the beam back to the center of the OMC QPDs, but overall, this was a really easy process (did I mention that tip-tilt adjustment is not an easy thing to do?).
We ended up with this (we haven't measured the beam height again as OM2 was the only thing that moved, so the height numbers are from the previous table just for convenience).
OM1 | OM2 | OM3 | |
Beam height (didn't measure, no reason to suspect that they changed) |
1/8" high | 1/8" low | 1/16" low |
PIT slider | 20 | 0 | -590 |
YAW slider | 650 | 760 | 60 |
MAX DAC output | 7.2k | 5k | 7.1k |
I declared that this is a good place to stay. Rahul fixed the balance mass on OM2 upper mass.
Rahul also fixed the balance mass on OMCS.
Fast shutter path, WFS path, ASAIR path, OMCR path
We closed the fast shutter and the reflected beam goes to the high power beam dump.
We opened the fast shutter and checked the WFS path. The beam was already hitting one quadrant of WFSB but was entirely missing the WSFA. The beam was a bit low on the lens on the WFS sled, so I used two fixed 1" steering mirrors upstream of the WFS sled to move the beam up on the lens and keep the path reasonably level. See Rahul's pictures for the beam height. After this, both WFSs saw the light, and at this point we used pico to center both. We weren't able to see the beam reflected by the WFS but assume that it still hit the black glass.
We tried to see the ASAIR beam but couldn't. Since the beam is hitting the center of ASC-AS_C, we assume that the ASAIR beam will still hit the black glass.
OMCR beam was already hitting the OMCR photodiode, but the beam was REALLY close to the beam dump that's supposed to catch ghost beam. We temporarily moved the dump so the beam is about 5mm from the edge of the glass, but this might be too far. I'll find how close it's supposed to be from the past alog.
Couldn't check if PZT1 is working.
We tried to see if OMC length error signal makes sense when scanning the OMC length, but whenever the OMC is close to resonance there was a huge transient in the DCPD SUM as well as the length signal, probably the intensity noise (due to acoustics or jitter or something) is too much. We'll measure the capacitance of the PZT from outside.
Current status of LVEA
Laser hazard, HAM5 GV is closed, HAM6 and HAM7 curtains are closed.
Remaining tasks
OMCR path (beam dump position).
OMC trans video path. Use viewport simulator.
Check OSEMs of OMCS and OMs, recenter if needed.
Restore the shroud panels.
Restore the OMC trans beamdump on the -Y side.
Photos attached before the beam height on OM2 was adjusted. In Keita's stage "HAM6 irises and beam height on OM, the beam was still very low on OM2".
Photos of OM1 Pit and OM1 Yaw, OM2 Pit and OM2 Yaw, no photo of OM3. Position of beam on Iris 1, Iris 2 (and the backside of Iris 2). And photos of HAM7 with curtains split for SQZ beam. HAM6 with iris 1.
Attached below are the pictures showing the beam height on OM2 (pitch and yaw position) and WFS in HAM6 chamber after we made the adjustments.
Also shown is the lens before the WFS, on this the yaw looks OK and is slightly low on pitch but Keita is happy with this.
On a different note:-
OM1, OM3, OMC BOSEM flag position looks fine, OM2 will need some adjustment (once we are laser safe).
The latest slider values for OM1-3 has been attached below.
The last photo in alog 65101 from Sept. 2022 shows the distance between the OMCR beam dump and the main OMCR beam back then. We will get close to this photo.
https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/uploads/65101_20220923181903_BD_clearance.jpg
Possibly clipping at a beam dump. In picture "beforemoving" it can be seen how the beam hits the outer left edge of the IR card and this side "touches" the beam dump. We have moved the beam dump because the beam is centered on the lens.
Tagging EPO for alignment of HAM6 work
For the record, late alog - a couple weeks ago the EY wind fence was found to be damaged, again from early JAN severe winds (50+mph gusts for a few days).
Plans are in place to repair it with an improved round of reinforcement. A second snorkel lift is being delivered to aid in the repair scheduled for ~next week. FRS ticket filed.
tagging EPO for our EY wind fence
For the VAC team to bag and leak check the HAM7 leaky fiber feedthorugh FRS30141, yesterday afternoon I unplugged the HAM7 FC 532nm Fiber from the Feedthrough, covered with a plastic endcap and then replugged in when the VAC team was finished.
Tagging EPO for fiber feedthru pics.
Sina, Elenna, Kevin, Evan
Similar to Anamaria's measurements at Livingston last year (LLO:58623), we drove PR3 sinusoidally in pitch and yaw at low frequency to try to ascertain the amount of beam spot motion coupling into the arms. The following times are all 2023–04–12 UTC:
At 0.34 Hz, the transfer functions from oplev to oplev are
The absolute values are indicated because the measured phases are neither clearly around 0° nor 180°. The coherences are above 0.85. (At 0.11 Hz, the coherences are somewhat lower so I omitted those values.)
Livingston also saw order-unity transfer functions like this: LLO:59846.
A series of finesse simulations (G2400278, G2400281) indicated that by itself, PR3 cannot drive arm cavity motion at this level since (in the absence of any angular feedback control) the arm cavity finesse suppresses PR3-induced spot motion by a factor of order 100. On the other hand, PR3 motion can appear in the reflection wavefront sensors with an optical strength similar to or even greater than cHard motion, meaning that if PR3 has not been carefully diagonalized out of the sensing matrix then its motion can easily be impressed onto the test masses with an order unity ratio.
The attachment shows coherences between PR3 oplev and test mass oplevs from the end of O4a. Ignoring the microseism region, there is coherence between PR3 pitch and EY pitch from 0.4 to 0.8 Hz. One might guess this coherence arises because of LVEA ground motion, but there is no coherence between the PR3 oplev and either the HAM1 Z L4C channel or the HAM2 Z ground motion.