TITLE: 06/11 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Wind
INCOMING OPERATOR: Tony
SHIFT SUMMARY: Longer maintenance day today, with activities wrapping up an hour or two ago. We've made it through initial alignment but there was no green light in the arms when Oli and I first started locking. We ran the baffle align scripts for the TMS and ITMs but ended up finding the arms by hand. The rest of initial alignment was hands off. The wind has increased and ALS is now having a rough time staying locked, so we'll see how the rest of locking goes.
LOG:
| Start Time | System | Name | Location | Lazer_Haz | Task | Time End |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21:03 | SAF | HAZARD | LVEA | YES | LVEA is Laser HAZARD | 15:46 |
| 15:09 | VAC | Jordan | LVEA | n | Setup RGAs on output arm | 18:11 |
| 15:10 | FAC | Karen, Kim, Nelly | LVEA | n | Tech clean | 16:18 |
| 15:14 | VAC | Gerardo | LVEA | n | Input tube AIP work (climbing on tube) | 16:31 |
| 15:15 | CDS | Erik | EX | n | ADC install | 15:53 |
| 15:19 | SAF | Oli | LVEA | n | Transition LVEA to laser SAFE | 15:53 |
| 15:21 | IAS | Jason, TJ O., Tyler, Ryan C | LVEA | yes | FARO work | 21:58 |
| 15:28 | Film | Mike, Richard, film crew | LVEA | YES | Filming | 22:47 |
| 15:32 | OMC | Jeff | LVEA - HAM6 | - | DCPD electronics testing | 19:39 |
| 15:51 | CDS | Erik, Fil | EX | n | Add ADC to h1iscex | 16:18 |
| 15:52 | DAQ | Dave | remote | n | DAQ RESTART for EX work | 16:21 |
| 15:52 | VAC | Janos, Isaiah | EX, LVEA | n | Pump testing | 17:34 |
| 15:54 | FAC | Ken | LVEA | n | Cable tray install on FC tube area | 18:27 |
| 16:08 | FAC | Chris | LVEA, FCES, EX, EY | n | FAMIS tasks | 18:00 |
| 16:10 | PEM | Sheila | LVEA | n | Magnetometer move | 16:10 |
| 16:21 | CDS | Fil, Marc | EY | n | Reconnect IRIGb, install PEM AA chassis but not plug in | 17:01 |
| 16:32 | VAC | Norco | EY | n | CP7 fill | 19:24 |
| 16:36 | VAC | Travis | MX, EX | n | Turbo testing | 19:24 |
| 17:11 | SEI | Jim | Ends | n | Look for regulator | 18:18 |
| 17:19 | FAC | Kim | EX | n | Tech clean | 18:18 |
| 17:20 | FAC | Karen, Nelly | EY | n | Tech clean | 18:11 |
| 17:44 | PCAL | Francisco | EX | LOCAL | PCAL meas. | 19:34 |
| 17:58 | SAF | HAZARD | EX | YES | EX is Laser HAZARD | 19:34 |
| 18:11 | VAC | Norco | CS | n | CP2 fill | 20:04 |
| 18:14 | VAC | Gerardo, Jordan, Fil, Marc | LVEA | n | Pull cable from Y BM to mech room | 18:57 |
| 19:00 | VAC | Janos, Isaiah | EX | yes | Pump testing | 20:28 |
| 19:09 | CDS | Fil | High bay | n | Clearing out for genie lift to fit | 19:36 |
| 19:21 | SQZ | Kar Meng | Opt Lab | local | SHG work | 20:05 |
| 19:46 | CDS | Jonathan, Jamie, Dan | Remote | n | GDS/DMT restarts | 20:59 |
| 21:48 | VAC | Gerardo | LVEA | yes | Looking at VPs | 22:12 |
| 21:54 | VAC | Janos | EX | n | AIP check | 22:12 |
| 23:13 | Film | Film crew | FCTE | n | Filming the FCTE | 00:13 |
A consequence of WP 11919 today is that we should be able to see the range calculation (eg on the control room wall) for the GDS-CALIB_STRAIN-type channels for more of the time. Now, rather than needing the overall IFO to be ready for Observing (i.e. at NomLowNoise and no SDF diffs), there should be a range calc (for, eg, the thick red line on the range plot on the control room wall) thorughout much of the locking sequence, just like the range that is calculated from Cal-DELTAL_EXTERNAL (the thin line on the control room wall range plot).
No other configurations have changed, but this will be something that looks different from how it had been, so it's worth noting in the alog.
FranciscoL, [Remote: RickS]
After one week of having the inner beam centered (alog 78247), on June 11, we moved the beam by 5 mm on the Rx sensor.
The Rx side cover was compromised due to work being done by the vacuum team (images attached for reference.) Fortunately, the back cover was accessible and the measurements were done accessing the Rx input aperture through there. There might be a minor uncertainty on the alignment of the target - it was done by "projecting" the front of the power sensor by using the front camera of my phone; instead of the usual alignment by eye. Since the procedure had a regular/similar flow as the movements done on previous weeks, uncertainty of the target alignment should not be problematic for our measurements.
Attachment 'AlignedTarget' shows the alignment with the beam height gauge. Attachment 'BothBeamsBefore' shows the beams before making any changes. The pdf 'EndStationLog.pdf' lists the voltage values after each significant step of procedure T2400163. The steps represent writing down a voltage value after a particular change to the beam position. Some steps were recorded multiple times after minor changes.
The 'Initial' measurement is *equal* to the last voltage measurement from the previous movement, done on May 21 (alog 78247). The initial and final voltage measurement during today procedure remained the same despite the increase of the inner beam with the target.
We expect this movement to be symmetric (equal in magnitude, opposite in sign) to alog 77840
J. Kissel TIA D2000592: S/N S2100832_SN02 Whitening Chassis D2200215: S/N S2300003 Accessory Box D1900068: S/N S1900266 SR785: S/N 77429 I've finally got a high quality, trustworthy, no-nonsense measurement of the OMC DCPD transimpedance amplifiers frequency response. For those who haven't seen the saga leading up to today, see the 4 month long story in LHO:77735, LHO:78090, and LHO:78165. For those who want to move on with their lives, like me: I attach a collection plots showing the following for each DCPD: Page 1 (DCPDA) and Page 2 (DCPDB) - 2023-03-10: The original data set of the previous OMC DCPD's via the same transimpedance amplifier - 2024-05-28: The last, most recent data set before this, where I *thought* that is was good, even though the measurement setup was bonkers, - 2024-06-11: Today's data Page 3 (the Measurement Setup) - The ratio of the measurement setup from 2023-03-10 to 2024-06-11. With this good data set, we see that - there's NO change between the 2023-03-10 and 2024-06-11 data sets at high frequencies, which matches the conclusions from the remote DAC driven measurements (LHO:78112) and - there *is* a 0.3% level change in the frequency response at low frequency, which also matches the conclusions from the remote DAC driven measurements. Very refreshing to finally have agreement between these two methods. OK -- so -- what's next? Now we can return to the mission of fixing the front-end compensation and balance matrix such that we can - reduce the impact on the overall systematic error in the calibration, and - reduce the frequency dependent imbalance that were each discovered in Feb 2024 (see LHO:76232). Here's the step-by-step: - Send the data to Louis for fitting. - Create/install new V2A filters for A0 / B0 bank - Switch over to these filters and accept in SDF - Update pydarm parameter file with new super-Nyquist poles and zeros. - Measure compensation performance with remote DAC driven measurement of TIA*Wh*AntiWh*V2A confirm bitterness / flatness Once IFO is back up, running, (does it need to be thermalized?) - Measure balance matrix, Remember -- SQZ OFF confirm better-ness / flatness - Install new balance matrix - Accept Balance Matrix in SDF Once IFO is thermalized - grab a new sensing function. - push a new updated calibration
The data gathered for this aLOG lives in:
/ligo/svncommon/CalSVN/aligocalibration/trunk/
Common/Electronics/H1/DCPDTransimpedanceAmp/OMCA/S2100832_SN02/20240611/Data/
# Primary measurements, with DCPD TIA included in the measurement setup (page 1 of the main entry's attachment measurement diagrams)
20240611_H1_DCPDTransimpedanceAmp_OMCA_DCPDA_mag.TXT
20240611_H1_DCPDTransimpedanceAmp_OMCA_DCPDA_pha.TXT
20240611_H1_DCPDTransimpedanceAmp_OMCA_DCPDB_mag.TXT
20240611_H1_DCPDTransimpedanceAmp_OMCA_DCPDB_pha.TXT
# DCPD TIA excluded, "measurement setup" along (page 2 of the main entry's attachment measurement diagrams)
20240611_H1_MeasSetup_ThruDB25_PreampDisconnected_OMCA_DCPDA_mag.TXT
20240611_H1_MeasSetup_ThruDB25_PreampDisconnected_OMCA_DCPDA_pha.TXT
20240611_H1_MeasSetup_ThruDB25_PreampDisconnected_OMCA_DCPDB_mag.TXT
20240611_H1_MeasSetup_ThruDB25_PreampDisconnected_OMCA_DCPDB_pha.TXT
Here are fit results for the TIA measurements
DCPD A:
Fit Zeros: [6.606 2.306 2.482] Hz
Fit Poles: [1.117e+04 -0.j 3.286e+01 -0.j 1.014e+04 -0.j 5.764e+00-22.229j 5.764e+00+22.229j] Hz
DCPD B:
Fit Zeros: [1.774 6.534 2.519] Hz
Fit Poles: [1.120e+04 -0.j 3.264e+01 -0.j 1.013e+04 -0.j 4.807e+00-19.822j 4.807e+00+19.822j] Hz
A PDF showing plots of the results is attached as 20240611_H1_DCPDTransimpedanceAmp_report.pdf. The DCPD A and B data and their fits (left column) next to their residuals (right column) are on pages 1 and 2, respectively. The third page is a ratio between DCPD A and DCPD B datasets. Again, they're just overlaid on the left for qualitative comparison and the residual is on the right.
I used iirrational. To reproduce activate the conda environment I set up specifically just to run iirrational.
activate /ligo/home/louis.dartez/.conda/envs/iirrational
Then run
python /ligo/groups/cal/common/scripts/electronics/omctransimpedanceamplifier/fits/fit_H1_OMC_TIA_20240617.py
A full transcript of my commands and the script's output is attached as output.txt.
On gitlab the code lives at https://git.ligo.org/Calibration/ifo/common/-/blob/main/scripts/electronics/omctransimpedanceamplifier/fits/fit_H1_OMC_TIA_20240617.py
Here's what I think comes next in four quick and easy steps: 1. Install new V2A filters (FM6 is free for both A0 and B0) but don't activate them. 2. Measure the new balance matrix element parameters (most recently done in LHO:76232. 3. Update L43 in the pyDARM parameter file template at /ligo/groups/cal/H1/ifo/pydarm_H1.ini (and push to git) N.B. doing this too soon without actually changing the IFO will mess up reports! Best to do this right before imposing the changes to the IFO to avoid confusion. 4. When there's IFO time, ideally with a fully locked and thermalized IFO: 4.a move all DARM control to DCPD channel B (double the DCPD_B gain and bring the DCPD_A gain to 0) 4.b activate the new V2A filter in DCPD_A0 FM6 and deactivate the current one 4.c populate the new balance matrix elements for DCPD A (we think it's the first column but this remains to be confirmed) 4.d move DARM control to DCPD channel A (bring both gains back to 1, then do the reverse of 4.a) 4.e repeat 4.b and 4.c for DCPD channel B then bring both gains back to 1 again 4.f run simulines (in NLN_CAL_MEAS) and a broadband measurement 4.g generate report, verify, and if all good then export it to the front end (make sure to do step 3. before generating the report!) 4.h restart GDS pipeline (only after marking report as valid and uploading it to the LHO ldas cluster) 4.i twiddle thumbs for about 12 minutes until GDS is back online 4.j take another simulines and broadband (good to look at gds/pcal) 4.k back to NLN and confirm TDCF's are good.
A PEM AA chassis was installed at EY in the H1-TCS-YC1 rack, slots U11/12. Unit was left powered off. An ADC will be installed in h1iscey IO chassis at a later date. Same as EX (alog 78368). Magnetometer cables were rerouted to allow installation of new chassis.
PEM AA Chassis: Serial Number S2300113
F. Clara, M. Pirello
WP 11914
ECR E2200401
Drawing D1301004
A PEM AA Chassis was installed in the H1-TCS-XC1 rack, slots U10/11. The AI Chassis D1101785 was moved to slots U13/14. An ADC card and adapter card were installed in the h1iscex IO chassis (third Adneco, first slot). The PEM AA chassis is part of the PEM upgrade ECR E2200401. Chassis will be used for testing of the LIGO DAC32 card.
PEM AA Chassis: Serial Number S2300112
D. Barker, F. Clara, M. Pirello E. Von Reis
Tue Jun 11 10:11:49 2024 INFO: Fill completed in 11min 45secs
Gerardo confirmed a good fill curbside.
There was a small typo on for a filter bank SUS-ITMX_L3_LOCK_L on line 55. By the time I noticed this and fixed it, it delayed it by ~7 min. The measurement completed and we lost lock about a minute afterward, but this seems more like a coincidence.
TITLE: 06/11 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Lock Acquisition
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Ryan C
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
SEI_ENV state: CALM
Wind: 1mph Gusts, 0mph 5min avg
Primary useism: 0.01 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.14 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:Locked for 29.5 hours! Magnetic injections currently running. We have a 6 hours maintenance window today.
Workstations were updated and rebooted. OS packages were updated. Conda packages were not updated.
TITLE: 06/11 Eve Shift: 2300-0800 UTC (1600-0100 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 148Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Ryan C
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
SEI_ENV state: CALM
Wind: 3mph Gusts, 1mph 5min avg
Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.13 μm/s
SHIFT SUMMARY:
H1 has been locked and observing all shift which is now 23 hours.
Everything seems to be running well.
Cosmic crew still staged in the MPR.
LOG:
| Start Time | System | Name | Location | Lazer_Haz | Task | Time End |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21:03 | SAF | HAZARD | LVEA | YES | LVEA is Laser HAZARD | 23:31 |
| 15:52 | imax | Film Crew | control room | - | COSMIC crew in Control Room | 21:18 |
| 20:37 | pcal | francisco.rick | pcalLab | yes | Pcal work | 01:27 |
| 22:48 | sqz | terry | opticsLab | yes | terry | 00:20 |
| 01:42 | IMAX | Cosmic Cast & Crew | Roof | N | Drone shots & interview | 04:38 |
| 01:44 | IMAX | Richard & Co | EX/4 | N | going half way to mid X & Tube enclosure | 03:44 |
FAMIS 26308 HVAC Vibrometer fans
The H0:VAC-MY_FAN1_270_1_ACC_INCHSEC saw a decrease in signal 3.5 days ago that also looks like it have more noise on the signal.
TITLE: 06/10 Eve Shift: 2300-0800 UTC (1600-0100 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 148Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Corey
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
SEI_ENV state: SEISMON_ALERT
Wind: 13mph Gusts, 10mph 5min avg
Primary useism: 0.04 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.13 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
H1 Has been locked for 14 hours and 20 minutes and is currently OBSERVING.
All systems seem to be functioning well.
TITLE: 06/10 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 127Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Tony
SHIFT SUMMARY:
For the morning H1 was in Observe (from Tony at 2am!) and shortly later we transitioned to Commissioning. (much of this occurring under a glow of blue light from the visiting film crew!)
The film crew completed multiple shots of Nergis, and filmed interviews with Sheila, Ibrahim, and Corey. And we had lots of extras in the Control Room as well. This work was mostly done after 1pm (they then moved to the Staging Building, LExC (early eve), and other shots?).
LOG:
On Friday 06/07/2024 Dave Barker sent an email to the vacuum group noting 3 spikes on the pressure of the main vacuum envelope, I took a closer look at the 3 different events and noticed that the events correlated to the IFO losing lock. I contacted Dave, and together we contacted the operator, Corey, who made others aware of our findings.
The pressure "spikes" were noted by different components integral to the vacuum envelope. Gauges noted the sudden rise on pressure, and almost at the same time ion pumps reacted to the rise on pressure. The outgassing was noted on all stations, very noticeable a the mid stations, and with less effect at both end stations, and for both with a delay.
The largest spike for all 3 events is noted at HAM6 gauge, we do not have a gauge at HAM5 or HAM4. The one near HAM6 is the one on the relay tube that joins HAM5/7 (PT152), with the restriction of the relay tube, then the next gauge is at BSC2 (PT120), however the spike is not as "high" as the one noted on HAM6 gauge.
A list of aLOGs made by others related to the pressure anomalies and their findings:
https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=78308
https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=78320
https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=78323
https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=78343
Note: the oscillation visible on the plot of the outer stations (Mids and Ends) is the diurnal cycle, nominal behavior.
Of live working gauges, PT110 appears closest to the source based on time signature. This is on the HAM5-7 relay tube and only indirectly samples HAM6*. It registered a peak of 2e-6 8e-6 Torr with decay time of order 30 17s. Taking a HAM as sample volume (optimistic) this indicates at least 0.02 0.08 torr-liters of "something" must have been released at once. The strong visible signal at mid- and end-stations suggests it was not entirely water vapor, as this should have been trapped in CP's.
For reference, a mirror in a 2e-6 Torr environment intercepts about 1 molecular monolayer per second. Depending on sticking fraction, each of these gas pulses could deposit of order 100 monolayers of contaminant on everything.
The observation that the IFO still works is comforting; maybe we should feel lucky. However it seems critical to understand how (for example) the lock loss energy transient could possibly hit something thermally unstable, and to at least guess what material that might be. Recall we have previously noted evidence of melted glass on an OMC shroud.
Based on the above order-of-magnitude limits, similar gas pulses far too small to see on pressure gauges could be damaging the optics.
It would be instructive to compare before/after measures of arm, MC, OMC, etc. losses, to at least bound any acquired absorption
*corrected, thanks Gerardo
Corner RGA scans were collected today during maintenance, using RGA on Output tube. RGA volume has been open to main volume since last pumpdown ~March 2024, but electronics head/filament was turned off due to the small fan on the electronics head not spinning during observing. Unable to connect to HAM6 RGA, through either RGA computer in control room, or locally at unit with laptop. Only Output tube RGA available at this time.
Small aux cart and turbo was connected to RGA volume on output tube, then RGA Volume isolated from main volume and the filament turned on. The filament had warmed for ~2 hours prior to RGA scans being collected.
RGA Model: Pfeiffer PrismaPlus
AMU Range: 0-100
Chamber Pressure: 1.24E-8 torr on PT131(BSC 3), and 9.54E-8 torr on PT110 (HAM6), NOTE: Cold Cathode gauge interlocks tripped during filming activings in LVEA today, BSC2 pressure not recorded
Pumping Conditions: 4x 2500 l/s Ion Pumps and 2x 10^5 l/s cryopumps, HAM6 IP and HAM7/Relay tube
SEM voltage: 1200V
Dwell time: 500ms
Pts/AMU: 10
RGAVolume scans collected with main volume valve closed, only pumping with 80 l/s turbo aux cart
Corner scans collected with main volume valve open, and aux cart valve closed
Comparison to March 2024 scan provided as well.
Richard posting from Robert S.
I had a work permit to remove viewports so I opened the two viewports on the -Y side of HAM6. I used one of the bright LED arrays at one viewport and looked through the other viewport so everything was well lit. I looked for any evidence of burned spots, most specifically on the fast shutter or in the area where the fast shutter directs the beam to the cylindrical dump. I did not see a damaged spot but there are a lot of blocking components, so not surprising. I also looked at OM1 which is right in front of the viewports. I looked for burned spots on the cables etc but didnt see any. I tried to see if there were any spots on the OMC shroud, or around OM2 and OM3, the portions that I could see. I didnt see anything, but I think its pretty unlikely that I could have seen something.
Repeated 0-100AMU scans of the corner today, after filament had full 24 hours to warm up. Same scan parameters as above June 11th scans. Corner pressure 9.36e-9 Torr, PT 120.
Dwell time 500 ms
Attached is comparison to yesterday's scan, and compared to the March 4th 2024 scan after corner pumpdown.
There is a significant decrease in AMU 41, 43 and 64 compared to yesterday's scan.
Raw RGA text files stored on DCC at T2400198
P. Baxi , J. Kissel
Finished characterizing (Channels 1 to 4) of the new 524KHz Analog OMC Anti-Alias Chassis - S2300162
BodePlot_Channel_1_4_freq_start_102.4KHz_Freq_stop_1KHz_Steps_100.pdf (raw data - available in DCC S2300162)
- We see the frequency response has minimal phase impact in the gravitational wave band, with deg of phase loss at 1000 Hz.
ASD_SR785_Channel_1_4_Freq_span_4to32K_32to256K_128to1024K.pdf (raw data - available in DCC S2300162)
- We see the noise of each of these 4 representative ADC channels is around ~20 nV/rtHz
Bode plot and ASD plots) Bode plot and ASD plots)
For the bode: We see the frequency response has minimal phase impact in the gravitational wave band, with 1.5 deg of phase loss at 1000 Hz.
LLO noted a 10 Hz comb that was attributed to the IRIG B monitor channel at the end station connected to the PEM chassis. (https://alog.ligo-la.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=71217)
LHO has agreed to remove this signal for a week to see how it impacts our DARM signal.
EX and EY cables have been disconnected.
Disconnection times
| EX | GPS 1400946722 | 15:51:44 Tue 28 May 2024 UTC |
| EY | GPS 1400947702 | 16:08:04 Tue 28 May 2024 UTC |
I checked H1:CAL-PCALX_IRIGB_DQ at gps=1400946722 and H1:CAL-PCALY_IRIGB_DQ at gps=1400947702. From 10 seconds prior to the cable disconnection to 1 sec before the cable disconnection, IRIG-B code in these channels agreed with the time stamp after taking into account the leap second offset (18 sec currently).
Note that the offset is there because the IRIG-B output from the CNS-II witness GPS clock ignores leap seconds.
I fixed things in https://svn.ligo.caltech.edu/svn/aligocalibration/trunk/Common/Scripts/Timing/ so that they run in the control room with modern gpstime package and also the offset is not hard coded. I committed the changes.
Please reconnect the cable soon so we have independent witness signals of the time stamp. There could be a better implementation but we need the current ones until a proper fix is proposed, approved and implemented.
I have checked the weekly Fscans to look for similar 1 Hz and 10 Hz combs in the H1 data (which we haven't see in the H1 O4 data thus far), or any obvious changes in the H1 spectral artifacts occurring due to the configuration change May 28. I do not see any changes due to this configuration change. This may be because the coupling from the timing IRIG-B signal may be lower at LHO than it is at LLO. I do notice that there is some change around the beginning of May 2024 that the number of line artifacts seems to increase; this should be investigated further. Attached are two figures showing the trend of 1 Hz and 10 Hz comb, where the black points are the average comb power and colored points are the individual comb frequency power values; color of the individual points indicates the frequency. Note that there is no change in the last black data point (the only full-1-week Fscan so far).
The IRIGB cables at EX and EY have been reconnected (PEM AA Chassis CH31).