Displaying reports 12581-12600 of 88221.Go to page Start 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 End
Reports until 16:35, Saturday 18 May 2024
H1 General (SEI)
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:35, Saturday 18 May 2024 - last comment - 10:09, Monday 20 May 2024(77906)
OPS Saturday day shift update

TITLE: 05/18 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 152Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Tony
SHIFT SUMMARY: Lost lock at the end of the shift, DRMI alignment issues and PRMI was plagued by a ~20Hz buzz that kept killing it after 2 seconds, the mode cleaner was slow to lock in each attempt today. After the 3rd IA DRMI was finally in the mood to lock and I didn't have to go through PRMI and I returned to Observing at 21:15UTC. I was not able to take the calibration measurement this afternoon as planned.

15:25 UTC HAM3 ISI CPS trip while doing green arms in IA. I could not finish SRC align, as SRM was continually saturating. There was also a couple of IY saturations, and there was an earthquake shaking everything at the time.

16:02 UTC HAM3 ISI CPS trip during FIND_IR? I couldn't get PRMI to stay locked for more than 2 seconds.

17:00 UTC I restored the alignments to 05/18/24 03:00 UTC which was right before we locked last night for the 11 hour lock. After locking ALS I could immediately see the beatnotes were better, but DRMI only had small flashes. A few rounds of CHECK_MICH and still bad flashes, 13:31 I started a 2nd IA skipping GREEN_ARMs, there were no saturations during this IA and I was able to finish SRC_ALIGN.

I'm still not able to get PRMI to stay locked for more than 2 seconds, theres a 20ish Hz oscillation that kills it when the MICH1 filter is ramped on? I tried lowering the PRMI-MICH gain from 3.2 to 2.8 in lscparams as Sheila suggested the other day. It lasted longer but was still ultimately killed by the 20Hz buzzing, I lowered it more to 2.6 and it lasted even longer but was killed when PRCL1 turned on? AS AIR was still clearly misaligned so I went through CHECK_MICH which made things worse?  I now had worse PRMI flashes and still a clearly misaligned AS AIR. During this I was also trying to help adjust PRM/BS while in PRMI to fix AS AIR.

19:37UTC After some more seemingly fruitless adjusting of PRM and BS I started a 3rd IA... it looks centered on AS-AS_C during SRC and PRC alignment?

Same behavior as before, bad DRMI then PRMI gets killed after a few seconds from the 20Hz, its also always right after the BS_M1_L filter is turned on. Lockloss after a few rounds of PRMI.

For the next attempt I tried turning down the PRMI-PRCL gain from 6 to 4 but then it was able to lock DRMI all of a sudden and we didn't even go through PRMI... so I'll revert these changes. I have no idea whats different this attempt from the last or why it decided now it wants to work but I'll take it. The alignment was just finally good enough, even though it wasn't on the first attempt after the IA finished?

21:15 UTC back to Observing

23:21 UTC lockloss from a HAM3 ISI trip, same as before, CPS sensor tagging SEI

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - 17:34, Saturday 18 May 2024 (77914)SEI

Looking at trends, there were four trips today from HAM3 CPS glitches, none of which can be attributed to earthquakes, as far as I can tell. HAMs are usually not the first to get tripped, and the glitches Ryan posts don't look physical, they look like typical CPS glitches. Tony went out and power cycled the CPS parts of the HAM ISI interface chassis for HAM3, we'll just have to wait and see if that fixes it or if more invasive work is needed.

First attached trends are the high frequency blrms we have for monitoring for glitches, they seem like they would have provided some warning for this, there were glitches an hour or so before the first trip. I think we have some tests for this in DIAG_MAIN? We should think about how to get this  to get some more attention.

 

Images attached to this comment
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - 10:09, Monday 20 May 2024 (77943)SEI

There is indeed a test in DIAG_MAIN for noisy CPS sensors called "SEI_CPS_NOISEMON" and it was going off last night during the glitches and 2 trips (marked by the T cursors at 02:37 and 02:47 UTC), doing a "guardctrl log -n1000 -a "1400207700" -b "1400210000" DIAG_MAIN" of a time where the CPS was glitching last night yielded the following trace back. Maybe there should be verbal_alarms check for this as well?

2024-05-20_02:34:59.601882Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 0: SEI_CPS_NOISEMON: Noisy HAM CPS(s): [('HAM3', 'V2')]
2024-05-20_02:36:49.102804Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 0: SEI_CPS_NOISEMON: Noisy HAM CPS(s): [('HAM3', 'V2')]
2024-05-20_02:37:01.099752Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 0: SEI_CPS_NOISEMON: Noisy HAM CPS(s): [('HAM3', 'H2'), ('HAM3', 'V2')]
2024-05-20_02:37:01.353280Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 1: SEI_STATE: ['HAM3'] is not nominal
2024-05-20_02:37:05.341046Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 0: FAST_SHUTTER_HV: Fast Shutter HV not Ready
2024-05-20_02:37:05.353980Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 3: SEISMON_EQ: LSC-REFL_SERVO_SPLITMON > 8V
2024-05-20_02:37:05.354500Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 4: SHUTTERS: AS beam shutter open (nominal: closed)
2024-05-20_02:37:05.478436Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 3: SEISMON_EQ: IMC-REFL_SERVO_SPLITMON > 8V
2024-05-20_02:37:05.478660Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 4: SHUTTERS: Shutter A closed (nominal: open)
2024-05-20_02:37:05.605105Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 6: SQUEEZING: SQZ_MANAGER is not in the nominal state. Check we are Squeezing.
2024-05-20_02:37:05.907983Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 0: ESD_DRIVER: ESD X driver OFF
2024-05-20_02:37:08.857117Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 2: SEI_CPS_NOISEMON: Noisy HAM CPS(s): [('HAM3', 'V2')]
2024-05-20_02:37:09.471870Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 2: PSL_FSS: PZT MON is high, may be oscillating
2024-05-20_02:38:30.391003Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 0: PSL_ISS: Diffracted power is low
2024-05-20_02:40:33.387179Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 0: PSL_ISS: Diffracted power is low
2024-05-20_02:40:41.389505Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 0: PSL_ISS: Diffracted power is low
2024-05-20_02:40:54.382921Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 0: PSL_ISS: Diffracted power is low
2024-05-20_02:41:06.394464Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 0: PSL_ISS: Diffracted power is low
2024-05-20_02:41:11.386640Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 0: PSL_ISS: Diffracted power is low
2024-05-20_02:41:34.390778Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 0: PSL_ISS: Diffracted power is low
2024-05-20_02:43:51.602046Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 0: SEI_CPS_NOISEMON: Noisy HAM CPS(s): [('HAM3', 'H2'), ('HAM3', 'V2')]
2024-05-20_02:44:18.387630Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 0: PSL_ISS: Diffracted power is low
2024-05-20_02:47:24.388026Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 0: PSL_ISS: Diffracted power is low
2024-05-20_02:47:37.597677Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 0: SEI_CPS_NOISEMON: Noisy HAM CPS(s): [('HAM3', 'H2'), ('HAM3', 'V2')]
2024-05-20_02:47:37.854048Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 1: SEI_STATE: ['HAM3'] is not nominal
2024-05-20_02:47:42.394967Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 0: PSL_ISS: Diffracted power is low
2024-05-20_02:48:21.393532Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 0: PSL_ISS: Diffracted power is low
2024-05-20_02:48:33.387284Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 0: PSL_ISS: Diffracted power is low
2024-05-20_02:50:27.386254Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 0: PSL_ISS: Diffracted power is low
2024-05-20_02:51:25.216172Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 0: PSL_FSS: PZT MON is high, may be oscillating
2024-05-20_02:52:30.383231Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 0: PSL_ISS: Diffracted power is low
2024-05-20_02:53:48.383839Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 0: PSL_ISS: Diffracted power is low
2024-05-20_02:54:03.858072Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 0: SEI_CPS_NOISEMON: Noisy HAM CPS(s): [('HAM3', 'H2'), ('HAM3', 'V2')]
2024-05-20_02:54:04.477258Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 0: SEI_CPS_NOISEMON: Noisy HAM CPS(s): [('HAM3', 'H1'), ('HAM3', 'H2'), ('HAM3', 'H3'), ('HAM3', 'V1'), ('HAM3', 'V2'), ('HAM3', 'V3')]
2024-05-20_02:54:05.232099Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 0: SEI_CPS_NOISEMON: Noisy HAM CPS(s): [('HAM3', 'H1'), ('HAM3', 'H2'), ('HAM3', 'H3'), ('HAM3', 'V1'), ('HAM3', 'V3')]
2024-05-20_02:54:05.475537Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 0: SEI_CPS_NOISEMON: Noisy HAM CPS(s): [('HAM3', 'H1'), ('HAM3', 'H3'), ('HAM3', 'V1'), ('HAM3', 'V3')]
2024-05-20_02:54:10.853656Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 0: SEI_CPS_NOISEMON: Noisy HAM CPS(s): [('HAM3', 'H1')]
2024-05-20_02:54:27.392176Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 0: PSL_ISS: Diffracted power is low
2024-05-20_02:54:47.394045Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 0: PSL_ISS: Diffracted power is low
2024-05-20_02:54:57.724598Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 0: SEI_CPS_NOISEMON: Noisy HAM CPS(s): [('HAM3', 'H1'), ('HAM3', 'H3'), ('HAM3', 'V1'), ('HAM3', 'V3')]
2024-05-20_02:55:00.292951Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 0: SEI_CPS_NOISEMON: Noisy HAM CPS(s): [('HAM3', 'H1'), ('HAM3', 'H2'), ('HAM3', 'H3'), ('HAM3', 'V1'), ('HAM3', 'V2'), ('HAM3', 'V3')]
2024-05-20_02:55:06.224234Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 0: SEI_CPS_NOISEMON: Noisy HAM CPS(s): [('HAM3', 'H2'), ('HAM3', 'H3'), ('HAM3', 'V1'), ('HAM3', 'V2'), ('HAM3', 'V3')]
2024-05-20_02:55:06.356844Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 0: SEI_CPS_NOISEMON: Noisy HAM CPS(s): [('HAM3', 'H2'), ('HAM3', 'V1'), ('HAM3', 'V2')]
2024-05-20_02:55:06.482500Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 0: SEI_CPS_NOISEMON: Noisy HAM CPS(s): [('HAM3', 'H2'), ('HAM3', 'V2')]
2024-05-20_02:55:08.976174Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 0: SEI_CPS_NOISEMON: Noisy HAM CPS(s): [('HAM3', 'H2')]
2024-05-20_02:56:27.394588Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 0: PSL_ISS: Diffracted power is low
2024-05-20_02:56:56.390876Z DIAG_MAIN [RUN_TESTS.run] USERMSG 0: PSL_ISS: Diffracted power is low

Related: alog75134

Images attached to this comment
H1 General
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:05, Saturday 18 May 2024 - last comment - 14:16, Saturday 18 May 2024(77911)
OPS Saturday update

21:04 UTC back to NLN, I'm going to see how squeezing is doing then go into observing or optimize squeezing then go into observing.

After finishing my 3rd Initial Alignment I went through another round of too small DRMI flashes and the same PRMI locking and the 20Hz buzz killing it over and over again till a lockloss, we lost it at ALIGN_RECYCLING_MIRRORS after this for some reason. For the next attempt I turned down to gains for PRMI, PRCL1 and MICH1 from 6 -> 4 and 2.8 -> 2.6 respectively in lscparams and reloading ISC_DRMI but DRMI was suddenly able to lock after a few seconds and we didn't even go through PRMI. I reverted my gain changes, I have no idea if they would have helped or not, turning the MICH1 gain down from 3.2 to 2.8 did help us to survive longer in PRMI but it still was not enough.

Comments related to this report
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - 14:16, Saturday 18 May 2024 (77912)SQZ

21:15UTC After running the SCAN_{ALIGNMENT, ANG} for SQZ I went back to observing at 154 Mpc. The ALIGNMENT and ANG scans might need to be done again as we thermalize in 2 or 3 hours.

LHO VE
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:18, Saturday 18 May 2024 (77908)
Sat CP1 Fill

Sat May 18 10:12:26 2024 INFO: Fill completed in 12min 22secs

Images attached to this report
H1 General
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:59, Saturday 18 May 2024 - last comment - 12:30, Saturday 18 May 2024(77907)
OPS Saturday day update

Still having alignment problems, I wasn't able to finish SRC in IA. PRMI won't stay locked for more than 2 seconds despite ok flashes. I'm thinking of trying to restore the alignment to right before we locked last night or doing another initial alignment.

Comments related to this report
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - 12:02, Saturday 18 May 2024 (77909)

Still having trouble with PRMI, the 20Hz buzz keeps killing it, but I've been able to survive longer after lowering the MICH1 gain per Sheilas instructions, I'm going to try lower it a little more and stepping more slowly through the ISC_DRMI states

ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - 12:30, Saturday 18 May 2024 (77910)

Running through CHECK_MICH made it worse? Now the alignment looks bad again, AS AIR is clearly Pitched and no amount of adjusting PRM or BS seems to be helping it. I'm going to do another IA

H1 General
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:41, Saturday 18 May 2024 - last comment - 07:49, Saturday 18 May 2024(77904)
OPS Saturday day shift start

TITLE: 05/18 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 153Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Oli
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: SEISMON_ALERT
    Wind: 3mph Gusts, 2mph 5min avg
    Primary useism: 0.05 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.08 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:

Comments related to this report
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - 07:49, Saturday 18 May 2024 (77905)

PRM M3 started oscillating first, then ETMY then ETMX

H1 General
anthony.sanchez@LIGO.ORG - posted 01:07, Saturday 18 May 2024 (77903)
Friday night Eve Shift End

TITLE: 05/18 Eve Shift: 2300-0800 UTC (1600-0100 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 152Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Oli
SHIFT SUMMARY:
Winds and some light earthquakes made for difficult locking but H1 got there.
When we first locked the range was 142-ish Mpc, after about 2 hours of thermalizing and some fiddling with the SQZ_MAN  SCAN ALIGNMENT FDS & SQZ_SCANANG I was able to increase the range to the mid 150's. 

H1 has been locked for 4 and a half hours. and currently Observing.

LOG:
no log

H1 General (Lockloss, SEI, SQZ)
anthony.sanchez@LIGO.ORG - posted 22:41, Friday 17 May 2024 - last comment - 23:36, Friday 17 May 2024(77901)
Friday Ops Mid Shift report.

TITLE: 05/18 Eve Shift: 2300-0800 UTC (1600-0100 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 142Mpc
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: CALM
    Wind: 32mph Gusts, 24mph 5min avg
    Primary useism: 0.11 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.12 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:

After interviening to get better flashes on ALS Y arm
I tried to lock H1 and it failed at getting PRMI locked.
I started an Initial_Alinment.
Initial alignment took a long time to complete likely due to the wind.

Once the locking started H1 made it to Check_ALS_SHUTTERS and a 5.0 Mag Earthquake from the South Sandwhich Island hit and unlocked the IFO.
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us6000mzcb/
This earthquake was not announced on verbals.
Nor was this one https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us6000mzcu/executive

After trying to relock and getting stuck in a PRMI loop again I requested another Initial_Alignment while waiting for the R wave to pass.
Relocking took a long time but we got back to OBSERVING at 3:38 UTC

The range isn't great so I started poking around the in the new Low Range Checks.
I have attached plots of diaggui & ndscope described on the ops wiki low range checks AND a picture of the bottom of the SQZr nuc33 .
Since I'm not really sure how these plots would normally look. I have no idea if I should adjust the squeeze angle or not. Everything I have read kinda suggests that perhaps the squeeze angle is fine maybe?

anthony.sanchez@cdsws29: caget H1:SQZ-CLF_REFL_RF6_PHASE_PHASEDEG
H1:SQZ-CLF_REFL_RF6_PHASE_PHASEDEG 212.115

All of these were taken before running the SQZ scan.

The IFO has now been locked for ~ 2 hours. I'm thinking that the perhaps I should try to run the SCAN_ALIGNMENT_FDS to see if better range can be reached.

GRB-SHORT  E484687 Standing down....
 




 

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
anthony.sanchez@LIGO.ORG - 23:36, Friday 17 May 2024 (77902)SQZ

After the IFO was locked for over 2 hours AND the Stand Down signal was lifted:

5:58 UTC I took the SQZ_MAN to SCAN_ALIGNMENT_FDS then to SCAN_SQZANG.
I then Accepted the SDF Diff and then took H1 back to Observing at 6:09 UTC.

H1:CDS-SENSMON_CLEAN_SNSC_EFFECTIVE_RANGE_MPC went from 143 to 155 Mpc.

anthony.sanchez@cdsws29: caget H1:SQZ-CLF_REFL_RF6_PHASE_PHASEDEG
H1:SQZ-CLF_REFL_RF6_PHASE_PHASEDEG 204.936

Attached all the same plots of the aftermath for compairison!




 

Images attached to this comment
H1 General (Lockloss, SQZ)
anthony.sanchez@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:24, Friday 17 May 2024 (77900)
Friday Eve Shift Start

TITLE: 05/17 Eve Shift: 2300-0800 UTC (1600-0100 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Lock Acquisition
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Ryan C
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: CALM
    Wind: 25mph Gusts, 15mph 5min avg
    Primary useism: 0.09 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.12 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
When I inherited the IFO we were locked. 
I needed to accept the SQZ SDF Diffs to get into Observing.

I first ran a SQZ scan before accepfting those SDF Diffs. But I think I ran the wrong one. I likely should have ran SCAN_ALIGNMENT_FDS  instead of SCAN_SQZANG.
Took H1 to Observing at 23:55 UTC
LOCKLOSS 00:16 UTC Screen shot of lockloss tools attached.


 

 

 

 

Images attached to this report
H1 CDS
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:31, Friday 17 May 2024 - last comment - 11:12, Monday 20 May 2024(77899)
fmscan, program to show filter module activity over long time periods

fmscan is a program which, for a given filter module and time period, reports when filters were switched on/off.

It is designed to be ran from MEDM as an MEDM_EXEC_LIST program. To set this up, add the following to your MEDM_EXEC_LIST environmental variable:

    :fmscan;/ligo/gitcommon/fmscan/fmscan.py &P &

The first attachment shows the fmscan option being selected in the Execute pull down menu, opened from MEDM with the right-mouse-button. You can select any EPICS PV channel associated with the filter module (e.g. GAIN, OFFSET, SWI, etc)

Second attachment shows the time-selector GUI with the default time range of the past 24 hours. Any gpstime format can be used (e.g. GPS seconds, "1 month ago", etc.)

The third attachment shows the filters activity for H1:LSC-SRCL1 for the past day. Filter changes are shown in bold. First and last rows show the start/stop times respectively.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - 11:12, Monday 20 May 2024 (77946)

fmscan has been added to the default MEDM_EXEC_LIST environment variable via puppet. If you don't redefine MEDM_EXEC_LIST in your .bashrc file, fmscan will now automatically show up in your exec listing.

H1 General
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:30, Friday 17 May 2024 (77892)
OPS Friday day shift summary

TITLE: 05/17 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Lock Acquisition
INCOMING OPERATOR: Tony
SHIFT SUMMARY: We're almost relocked following troubles relocking from the initial lockloss in the morning. Back to NLN at 23:31

17:50  UTC - After getting no flashes on PRMI or DRMI, even after two runs of CHECK_MICH I started an Initial Alignment at 17:49. During this Shiela decided to revert the PR2 changes from yesterday through a manual IA. The winds stayed around 20/30 mph throughout the afternoon.

18:58 UTC - Back to locking, still windy out so there was a bunch of ALS locklosses

XARM is not able to stay locked, We were only able to keep it locked by during off the WFS but even then it was still unstable. Yarm was stable throughout the whole ordeal, so the wind might not have been that big of a factor?

I was able to keep Xarm locked by holding in NO_WFS for a bit then turning them on and slowly stepping through ALS to IR. I was then not able to get any flashes on DRMI and they weren't great on PRMI, we lost it while I was adjusting PRM

Sheila went out to the floor to adjust the COMM beatenote on ISCT1 to see if that would help us to be more stable (~ -10.5 to ~ -1.6). The wind was only getting worse as the afternoon went on.

22:30 UTC - I started another IA after we still couldnt not get any flashes on PRMI or DRMI after Sheilas table adjustment.

After this last alignment I've been able to relock without any difficulty

LOG:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                

Start Time System Name Location Lazer_Haz Task Time End
17:37 SQZ Terry, Kar Meng Optics lab LOCAL SQZ work 19:08
21:19 SQZ Terry Optics lab LOCAL SQZ work Ongoing
21:23 ISC Sheila ISCT1 LOCAL Adjust COMM beatnote to help ALS 21:55
21:27 SQZ Kar Meng Optics lab LOCAL Join Terry, SHG work Ongoing
H1 CDS
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:09, Friday 17 May 2024 (77898)
PEM RF Scanner images available as mp4 movies from web server

Genevieve, Dave:

The PEM RF Scanner produces static png images of frequency-time plots every 10 minutes. These can be viewed at https://badger.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/rfscan/pngs/

I have created a daily cronjob, which collates the previous day's worth of 144 png files and produces two MP4 movie files. One has a frame rate of 8 frames per seconds with a run time of 18 seconds for a quick view. The second has a frame rate of 2fps and a run time of 72 seconds (attachment shows the web listing of these files).

For ease of access I have added a "RF Scanner" link to the CDS Web Page

Images attached to this report
H1 ISC
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:44, Friday 17 May 2024 (77897)
ALS fine tune IR should look at max trans power

I don't have time to implement this this afternoon, but it would be better for the fine_tune_Better state to look at the maximum IR, rather than the average. 

In times of high ground motion, we want to move through the ALS states quickly because we will be more stable once we are locked on IR.  The ALS is also not holding the arms stably on resonance, so the transmitted IR fluctuates a lot.  In the screenshot attached this is a case where the IR resonance has been found well, but because there is a lot of fluctation it is failing the test.  Replacing the cdu.avg on line 217 of ISC_GEN_STATES with a max would solve this, but since there isn't a function like that we need to write something.

Images attached to this report
H1 ISC
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:17, Friday 17 May 2024 (77895)
reverting move of PR3/PR2 spot, locking issues due to wind

MInhyo, Sheila, Ryan Crouch

After lossing lock this morning we decided to revert the move of PR3 (to move the spot on PR2) that we did yesterday.  We believe that the issues with our range may be due to the squeezing problem, which may have started before our move of PR3.  Still, we think it's best to try to revert before the weekend on the chance that that restores the range of H1.  High winds have made locking difficult since our lockloss this morning.

We realized yesterday that the PR2 spot move guardian state hasn't been updated since the IM sliders were calibrated in 77211, I've tried to scale the scale factors correctly for those changes.  We commented out all of the decorators from the PR2_SPOT_move guardian state so that we could use it without the full IFO locked, and we have now put them back in and reloaded the guardian.  We moved PR3 using this script while we had the X arm locked in IR, this lock uses the LSC POP diode for an error signal so we lost lock when we fell off that diode.  We then just used osems to restore optics to before yesterday's move, and set the pico back to it's starting point.  After setting the pico back in this way the Y arm green light was on the X arm diodes.   Once we understood that we moved the pico so that Y was on the Y camera and diode and X was on X, then optimized the beatnote.  We ran an initial alignment without much issue once the pico was set so that we had an error signal for the X arm IR. 

This resulted in a COMM beatnote of -10dBm, which had been closer to 0 before our moves.  We double checked that the test masses, BS, and PR3 were in the same location as before our move, and that we couldn't adjust the pico to increase the beatnote anymore.  While this should be OK for locking, we've been struggling with the high winds and in the past we've seen that when the ground motion is high we have better locking if the beatnotes are good.  So Minhyo, KarMeng and I went to the table to adjust the comm beatnote, we adjusted both pitch and yaw on the beatnote  beamsplitter and the steering beamsplitter directly in front of it. This brought the beatnote to -2dBm.  We are still having difficulty locking ALS, presumably because of the wind.

The Y arm seems able to hold lock for long periods of time, while the X arm green lock doesn't last more than a few minutes.  The VCO control signal has plenty of range, and the alingment seems stable, so I'm not sure what the problem is with the X arm.

H1 General
minhyo.kim@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:13, Friday 17 May 2024 - last comment - 15:40, Friday 17 May 2024(77888)
Checking on the noise from yesterday

Minhyo, Sheila

Checked for the reason of large BNS range drop (Sheila's alog: 77870), with comparing DARM plots (screenshot).
From the DARM comparison, it seems that the low frequency noise went worse right before PR3 alignment change, which correlated to the range drop before yesterday's commissioning (156 Mpc -> 142 Mpc). On the other hand, high frequency noise went worse after relocking using PR2 changed alignment. Seems that at both frequency range got worse with unknown reason (maybe SQZ).

While Sheila tried to fix SQZ, she suggested adjusting A2L gain value of ITM and ETM. After I finished with P2L decoupling of ITM, we had lockloss.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
minhyo.kim@LIGO.ORG - 15:40, Friday 17 May 2024 (77896)

Before the lockloss, ITM P2L gain changed to:

Channel Before After
ITMX -1 -1.005
ITMY -0.396 -0.355

 

Displaying reports 12581-12600 of 88221.Go to page Start 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 End