Displaying reports 14161-14180 of 86325.Go to page Start 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 End
Reports until 13:42, Tuesday 21 November 2023
H1 IOO (ISC, PSL)
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:42, Tuesday 21 November 2023 - last comment - 17:07, Tuesday 21 November 2023(74339)
Updated ISS Second Loop Closing Logic

R. Short, with guidance from K. Kawabe and J. Oberling

I've made some updates to the 'CLOSE_ISS' state in the IMC_LOCK Guardian, which handles the closing of the ISS second loop, that should make the closing of the second loop more consistent.

When the second loop is engaged, the DC working point of the ISS is determined by the output of the second loop's digital AC coupling (H1:PSL-ISS_SECONDLOOP_AC_COUPLING_DRIVE). This output is held when the second loop is closed, but it can occasionally be held far from the average of its oscillations before the second loop is engaged, which in the past has caused locklosses and was mitigated earlier this year (see alog 67347). While the second loop isn't causing locklosses anymore (that I can recall), we do still see the digital AC coupling output being held slightly off from the mean, causing the diffracted power to jump. I've expanded upon Georgia's logic by changing the way the output of the AC coupling drive is held to be more consistent. Instead of waiting to hold the output until it's near the mean over the past 10 seconds (a calculation that itself can take several seconds), the process is now as follows:

  1. Take a 10-second average on the AC coupling drive output
  2. Hold the output
  3. Write the 10-second average value to the AC coupling drive's offset
  4. Turn off the input and turn on the offset
  5. Unhold then rehold the output (to grab the offset value)
  6. Perform Georgia's "within 100 counts" check on the output
  7. If successful, zero the offset and turn back on the input

I was able to test this logic during the maintenance period today, both with the IMC locked at 2W and 60W, with great success. We'll run with this for a while to see if over several lock acquisitions the second loop is being engaged with a more consistent digital AC coupling drive. The updated IMC_LOCK Guardian code is loaded and committed to SVN.

Comments related to this report
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - 17:07, Tuesday 21 November 2023 (74354)

This is infinitely better than the old, bandaid-on-bandaid logic. See how the diffraction number hardly changed after the 2nd loop was engaged.

Images attached to this comment
H1 General
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:22, Tuesday 21 November 2023 (74336)
LVEA Swept

LVEA Swept following T1500386. WAP and lights off. Noticed nothing other than what Oli wrote in 73244. Loudest things are VAC computer stands and CER fans. 

H1 SQZ
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:02, Tuesday 21 November 2023 - last comment - 15:24, Tuesday 21 November 2023(74334)
added cable to 3MHz local oscillator

I added roughly 5 meters of LMR 195 to the cable sending the 3MHz local oscillator to the demod for the OMC 3MHz signal.  This should add roughly 21ns of delay, or roughly 23 degrees of phase for the 3MHz signal. 

We are hoping that this will shift the turn around point of the ADF sqz angle readback so that our operating point is at a better place to use this readback to adjust the sqz angle. (for background see 74256

This means we will need to retune the SQZ angle before we to observing today.

Comments related to this report
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 15:24, Tuesday 21 November 2023 (74347)

The SQZ angle will have to be retuned when we relock today.  To do this, from the sitemap choose SQZ > SQZ overview to pull up the scren shown in the screenshot.  You can then adjust the slider circled in red (H1:SQZ-CLF_REFL_RF6_PHASE_PHASEDEG) looking at the FOMs on NUC33 to tune the squeezing.  Try to minimize the black trace on the spectrum on the bottom of NUC33.

Images attached to this comment
H1 General
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:59, Tuesday 21 November 2023 (74333)
OPS Tuesday day midshift update

Maintenance tasks have wrapped up but team CDS and SEI are trying to solve a problem that showed up at 19:29UTC on EndX where we lost all SEI signals (went to exactly zero). Microseis remains elevated, above the 90th percentile for the past ~16 hours and based on its trend visually it will probably take another 6 hours to get fully below that mark.

Once this issue is resolved we will resume attempting to lock.

H1 SQZ
daniel.sigg@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:31, Tuesday 21 November 2023 - last comment - 13:50, Tuesday 21 November 2023(74332)
Squeezer PMC

Fil Daniel

PMC install preparation:

Comments related to this report
filiberto.clara@LIGO.ORG - 13:50, Tuesday 21 November 2023 (74340)

Auxiliary Signals Concentrator 11 PD Monitors (D2300326) installed in SQZ-R2, slot U3.

Serial Number: S2300254

LHO VE
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:12, Tuesday 21 November 2023 (74331)
Tue CP1 Fill

Tue Nov 21 10:14:21 2023 INFO: Fill completed in 14min 16secs

Images attached to this report
H1 SUS
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:09, Tuesday 21 November 2023 (74329)
ETMY OPLEV charge measurement

I grabbed an ETMY OPLEV charge measurement this morning before the cleanroom work started.

Images attached to this report
H1 General
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:00, Tuesday 21 November 2023 (74328)
OPS Tuesday day shift start

TITLE: 11/21 Day Shift: 16:00-00:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Lock Acquisition
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Ryan S
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: CALM
    Wind: 4mph Gusts, 3mph 5min avg
    Primary useism: 0.05 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.93 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:

H1 CDS
erik.vonreis@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:05, Tuesday 21 November 2023 (74327)
Workstations updated

Workstations were updated and rebooted.  This was an OS package update.  Conda packages were not affected.

H1 General
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - posted 03:05, Tuesday 21 November 2023 (74326)
Overnight Locking Assistance

H1 called for assistance this morning at 10:13 UTC when the 40 minute initial alignment timer expired; it looks like following the earlier lockloss, H1 was struggling to lock (I suspect due to the very elevated secondary microsiesm, plot attached) and started an initial alignment. It took a while to align the arms in green, which caused IA to take longer than usual. I responded to the call right as the SRC was finishing its alignment (IA finished on its own), but when I selected 'INIT' to clear the alert on H1_MANAGER, this caused H1_MANAGER to jump to the 'RELOCKING' state and requested ISC_LOCK to start initial alignment over again. I didn't realize this until IA was a good way through, so I decided to let it finish (meaning IA was run twice in a row). I imagine one could add a check into H1_MANAGER to not re-request an initial alignment if one is already underway to avoid restarting the alignment process when an alert is acknowledged.

Following the most recent IA, H1 has been relocking smoothly and is currently up to POWER_10W.

Images attached to this report
H1 General (Lockloss)
anthony.sanchez@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:36, Tuesday 21 November 2023 (74325)
Monday Ops Eve Shift End & Midnight Lockloss 1384588803

TITLE: 11/21 Eve Shift: 00:00-08:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Lock Acquisition
INCOMING OPERATOR: Ryan S
SHIFT SUMMARY:
The entire night was very quiet... until:

07:59:44 UTC LOCKLOSS.... yes it was 16 seconds before my shift ended. There was an earthquake passing through at the time but it was a very small earthquake.
Microseism is still elevated.

ALS-X and ASL-Y guardians were reloaded.

IFO Current Status: Increase Flashes. 

LOG:
No log

 

Images attached to this report
H1 General
anthony.sanchez@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:54, Monday 20 November 2023 (74324)
Monday Ops Mid Eve Shift Report

TITLE: 11/21 Eve Shift: 00:00-08:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 159Mpc
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: SEISMON_ALERT
    Wind: 12mph Gusts, 9mph 5min avg
    Primary useism: 0.04 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 1.01 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
Incoming 5.5M Earthquake in the central mid atlantic ridge.
Microseism had been climbing back up for the last few hours too.

PSL_FSS_TPD: RefCav transmission low, fix alignment message on DIAG_MAIN now.


Otherwise, Very Quiet night. Locked for 13 hour and 48 Min. OBSERVING.

 

H1 ISC
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:48, Monday 20 November 2023 (74323)
ALSX long term trends

Over the weekend we've been having some trouble with low ALSX beatnote and other ALS issues causing locking trouble (See 74310, 74289). There was also a XVEA temperature change that happened Friday evening (picture here). Looking back at past changed of the ALSX laser we have June 30th alog70976 which had similar symptoms and was maybe fixed with a laser current and temperature change. Before that in Aug 2022 Daniel (alog64752) did a similar fix.

Plots attached have a dozen ALSX channels trended over 3.5years, 2years, 21 months, 65 days. The only bit that stands out to me is that the green power has started to trend down ~20 days ago, but it's a small amount (0.83 -> 0.80mW).

Images attached to this report
H1 ISC (DetChar, ISC, SUS)
artem.basalaev@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:26, Monday 20 November 2023 - last comment - 10:20, Tuesday 28 November 2023(74315)
Projection of ESD quadratic noise
Artem, Gabriele, Sheila, Louis

Plots and Jupyter notebook with these results are also available here.


ESD quadratic noise

This is a follow up on investigation of potential non-stationary noise at Handford introduced by the ESD drive, reported in 73913 and previous entries linked from there. The idea is that from the ESD signal, Vs, and bias, Vb, voltages we can reconstruct ESD force applied to the mirror, using equations in LIGO-T1700446. The force component linear in Vs gets subtracted by the control loop and therefore does not affect DARM. But the force component quadratic in Vb and both linear and quadratic in Vb can couple to DARM. Therefore in this report, we are calculating respective force components and projecting them to DARM. Then respective ASDs and spectrograms are compared.

Selection of input channels

The ESD drive voltages are recorded by Monitors, H1:SUS-ETMX_L3_LVESDAMON_LL_OUT_DQ for Vs and H1:SUS-ETMX_L3_ESDAMON_DC_OUT_DQ for Vb. Important note here: we initially tried channel H1:SUS-ETMX_L3_ESDAMON_UL_OUT_DQ to get Vb, but it looks like it's not connected to anything and recording ASD noise... The H1:SUS-ETMX_L3_ESDAMON_DC_OUT_DQ seems to be fine. Also, LIGO-T1700446 specifies calibrations for voltage channels (equations 13 and 16), but currently the channels mentioned above are already calibrated to voltage.

Calculating force terms

Calculation is based on equation 3 in LIGO-T1700446, but this equation is modified in the following way:
  • Bias voltage is decomposed into DC and varying part, to avoid propagating DC term through the calculation (DC term will not affect DARM). So the following substitution is applied: Vb = Vb_DC + dVb. The term Vb_DC is simply median of Vb time series, and dVb is Vb time series with median subtracted
  • Brackets are then opened to gather all the terms linear in Vs, quadratic in Vs, linear in dVb, quadratic in dVb, and mixed dVb*Vs term. Noise term is then quadratic in Vs + linear and quadratic in dVb + mixed dVb*Vs
Here are the new equations: # new equations with dVb and rearrange terms F_quadratic_Vb_term = (alpha+gamma)*(dVb_ts**2) F_quadratic_Vs_term = (alpha+gamma)*(Vs_ts**2) F_mixed_term = (gamma-alpha)*2*dVb_ts*Vs_ts F_linear_Vb_term = (alpha+gamma)*2*Vb_DC*dVb_ts + beta2*(dVb_ts+Vb_DC) + beta*(dVb_ts+Vb_DC) F_linear_Vs_term = (gamma-alpha)*2*Vb_DC*Vs_ts + beta2*(-Vs_ts) + beta*(Vs_ts) F_total_term = F_quadratic_Vb_term + F_quadratic_Vs_term + F_mixed_term + F_linear_Vb_term + F_linear_Vs_term # noise term has everything _linear_ in Vs and both _linear and quadratic_ in Vb F_noise_term = F_quadratic_Vb_term + F_quadratic_Vs_term + F_mixed_term + F_linear_Vb_term Coefficients alpha, beta, beta2 and gamma are taken from this measurement: https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=56613.

Results: 95%CL ASD and spectrograms for ESD noise converted to equivalent strain

  • Force is converted to acceleration by dividing by the mirror mass (40 kg).
  • Subsequently acceleration is divided by omega^2 to convert to displacement.
  • Finally displacement is converted to equivalent strain by dividing by arm length (4 km). Now the spectrum can be compared to DARM channel.

Replacing Vb with white noise at typical level, to avoid projecting Monitor's ADC noise

Gabriele made a plot showing ASD of Vb for different levels of bias and when the bias is off. What we can see is a shoulder of additional noise which we believe is coming from ADC of the monitor. To get rid of that, we generate white noise time series for dVb at the level of Vb where it is not dominated by additional noise. The new dVb term is then plugged into the equation for the force term and a new set of plots is produced.

Results: 95%CL ASD and spectrograms for ESD noise converted to equivalent strain (dVb replaced with white noise - see above)

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
artem.basalaev@LIGO.ORG - 14:08, Wednesday 22 November 2023 (74372)DetChar, ISC, SUS
I did the same exercise but now for GPS time 1382909598 (and up to +22 mins from it), where bias voltage was set at 409V. Below you find plots where you can see that noise went up* (ASD) but apparent non-stationarity is reduced (spectrograms), which is consistent with Gabriele's findings in comment in 73935, specifically this and this plots.

click for full size


click for full size

* Currently noise ASD is actually higher than DARM, this is not realistic but the modelling is not 100% precise. What is important here is relative changes with respect to results with "standard" level of bias voltage.


Plots and Jupyter notebook with these results are also available here.
Images attached to this comment
gabriele.vajente@LIGO.ORG - 10:20, Tuesday 28 November 2023 (74444)

Another way to look at ESD quadratic noise. The DARM strain band-limited RMS (computed between 16 and 30 Hz and normalized to the median over time) is correlated to the total RMS of the ESD drive (dominated by the low frequency component, below 10 Hz)

Images attached to this comment
H1 General
anthony.sanchez@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:14, Monday 20 November 2023 (74321)
Monday Ops Eve Shift Start

TITLE: 11/21 Eve Shift: 00:00-08:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 158Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Oli
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: CALM
    Wind: 9mph Gusts, 6mph 5min avg
    Primary useism: 0.03 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.64 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
Current Status of H1: Locked for 8 hours 29 minutes and OBSERVING.

I will reload ALS-X and Y if a lock loss happnens to load in Mr. Crouch's Changes.

H1 General
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:13, Monday 20 November 2023 (74322)
Ops DAY Shift End

TITLE: 11/21 Day Shift: 16:00-00:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 157Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Tony
SHIFT SUMMARY: Observing and Locked for 8.5 hours. Been a quiet day.
LOG:

16:00UTC In NOMINAL_LOW_NOISE, I rejected the ASC-X_FIBR_LOCK_BEAT_RFMIN value change of -10 so it is still at -20dB, and put us into Observing.

Start Time System Name Location Lazer_Haz Task Time End
18:51 FAC Randy EX n Delivery 20:21
19:24 FAC Chris, locksmith OSB, EY, EX n Changing external locks 22:28
H1 ISC
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:57, Monday 20 November 2023 - last comment - 15:03, Monday 20 November 2023(74310)
ALS Beatnote Strength Fluctuations Due to VEA Temperature Changes

Building off of 74289, I checked to see how the ALS-X beatnote strength was doing, and then tried to confirm that the issues were actually a result of the EX VEA temperature changes.

Currently, the beatnote strength is still oscillating, and last night it was back to dipping below -10dB when at its minimum (attachment1).

Here is what I noticed when looking to confirm the beatnote-temperature correlations:

ALS-X_FIBR_DEMOD_RFMON is very sensitive to changes in EX VEA temperatures
- Already pretty obvious based on how the temp changes from Friday affected ALS-X_FIBR_DEMOD_RFMON, but even small changes/normal daily fluctuations in EX VEA temperatures can change the beatnote strength by almost 2dB.
- Here are two stretches of time comparing the EX VEA average temperatures and how it affects ALS-X_FIBR_DEMOD_RFMON (attachment2, attachment3).
    - Sometimes the temperature affects the beatnote strength more than other times.


ALS-Y_FIBR_DEMOD_RFMON is NOT very sensitive to changes in EY VEA temperatures
- Comparing ALS-Y_FIBR_A_DEMOD_RFMON and FMC-EY_VEA_AVTEMP_DEGF(attachment4), although VEA temp changes are definitely affecting the beatnote strength (especially during large temperature excursions), the beatnote strength is able to stay very consistant.

It is especially interesting seeing the difference between the amount of variation in ALS-X_FIBR_DEMOD_RFMON as compared to ALS-Y_FIBR_DEMOD_RFMON as temperature changes (attachment5). To be fair, the temperatures at EX do seem to fluctuate more (higher highs and lower lows) than at EY, but the way that the ALS-X beatnote strength reacts still seems to me to be much more exaggerated than it should be (like if ALS-Y was going through the EX temperature changes).

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
daniel.sigg@LIGO.ORG - 15:03, Monday 20 November 2023 (74320)

The demod readback goes thru channel 1 of the demodulator concentrator D1100691 before reaching the EtherCAT end station chassis 2 at the L5 terminal. The RF monitor is read using this calibration dB = 16.67 * V - 72.

H1 ISC
naoki.aritomi@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:20, Wednesday 15 November 2023 - last comment - 12:20, Tuesday 21 November 2023(74231)
Turned on two stage whitening of AS72 A

Naoki, Sheila

In the AS72 sensing matrix measurement in alog74106, Daniel suggested to increase the whitening gain of AS72 since it could be limited by ADC noise. We checked the whitening filter of AS72 A and B. Both of them have 12dB whitening gain, but one stage whitening is engaged for AS72 A, while two stage whitening is engaged for AS72 B. We decided to engage the 2 stage whitening for AS72 A, which is used in SRC1. The IFO locks without any problem with this additional whitening. We accepted some SDFs as shown in the attached figures. We will try to increase the whitening gain later.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
elenna.capote@LIGO.ORG - 20:49, Thursday 16 November 2023 (74250)

I think the attached plot shows this was a good idea. I have some old data measuring whitening and no whitening on at RF72, but I never posted it because I couldn't figure out the correct RF72 transimpedance. The attached plot shows an estimation of the ADC noise level comparison with the noise spectrum in lock. Naoki and Daniel were kind enough to help me figure out the proper transimpedance for the RF72 (see 37065).

The measurement procedure and calculation procedure is detailed in alog 66734. At the time, RF72 was using 1 stage of whitening with 12 dB whitening gain.

I think it's likely my shot noise calculation here is incorrect. Correcting that calcuation is in progress...

Images attached to this comment
naoki.aritomi@LIGO.ORG - 12:20, Tuesday 21 November 2023 (74335)

During Tuesday maintenance and IMC_LOCK is OFFLINE, I measured the AS72 dark noise with different whitening setting. The attached figure shows the dark noise of AS72 A Q PIT/YAW, which are used in SRC1. The 2 stage whitening and 12 dB whitening gain are the current nominal setting. In the previous Elenna's measurement, there was a bump around 25 Hz, but there is no bump in today's measurement.

Images attached to this comment
H1 ISC (SUS)
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:44, Wednesday 08 November 2023 - last comment - 13:50, Tuesday 21 November 2023(74100)
BS M2 coil drivers limit DARM when in their high noise state

I went back and forth (~5 mins each) with the BS M2 coil drivers between their nominal low noise state, and their higher noise higher range state. 

When in the higher noise state (state 2), there seems to be consistently higher noise between about 55 Hz up to 100 Hz. In the attached plot the blue / green is the nominal low noise state, while red / pink is the high noise state.

I'll work on making this an actual noise projection that we can include in the noise budget, using Craig's code for quad PUM noise as a guide.

We were in the high noise state 2 from 20:56:45 - 21:04:00.  Then in low noise state from 21:06:10 - 21:11:15 (there's a glitch during this time).  Back to high noise from 21:13:20 - 21:19:40 (there's a small glitch during this time).  Back to low noise from 21:21:50 - 21:28:00.  All times UTC on 8 Nov 2023.  After this I handed back to Robert.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - 13:50, Tuesday 21 November 2023 (74338)

I've finally had a look at projecting this noise to what it looks like in our nominal state.

I'm 'following along' the philosophy of Craig's quad coil driver noise projections in https://git.ligo.org/aligo_commissioning/labutils/-/blob/master/coil_drivers_state_switch/plot_all_quad_pum_switch.py

I take an average of the ASDs of the noisy time (blue trace), and an average of the nominal quiet time (orange trace), then subtract them to get the excess power (green trace).  I then take the residual excess power, and divide by the ratio of filters that are different between the two times, and that gives the projection of this excess power to our nominal state (red trace). 

The attached plot shows that the projected noise (red) is more than a factor of 100x below our nominal sensitivity (orange), so BS M2 coil driver noise should not be an (immediate) issue for us.

The notebook is in /ligo/home/jenne.driggers/LHO_work/2023_11_21_BS_coil_driver_noise_budget/BS_coil_driver_noise_projection.ipynb

 

Images attached to this comment
H1 SQZ
victoriaa.xu@LIGO.ORG - posted 19:03, Wednesday 18 October 2023 - last comment - 15:29, Monday 20 November 2023(73562)
NLG HD sweep, HD mystery losses fully resolved, ~8dB HD SQZ with new crystal spot

Naoki, Sheila, Camilla, Vicky

Summary: After yesterday's crystal move LHO:73535, we re-aligned SQZT7, and now see 8 dB SQZ on the homodyne, up to measured NLG=114 without a phase noise turnaround! This fully resolves the homodyne loss budget, there is 0 mystery loss remaining on the homodyne, from which we can infer 0 mystery losses in HAM7. Back to the IFO afterwards, after 1 day at this new crystal spot, squeezing in DARM is about 4.5dB - 4.8dB, reaching almost 5dB at the start of lock.

We first re-aligned the homodyne to the IFO SQZ alignment, which reached 4.8dB SQZ in DARM yesterday, so we are more confident the alignment back through the VOPO is not clipping. In yesterday's measurements, we had a sign error in the FC-ASC offloading script, which brought us to a bad alignment with limited homodyne squeezing, despite high 98% fringe visibilities. Attached is a screenshot of homodyne FC/ZM slider values with FC+SQZ ASC's fully offloaded (correctly), to which the on-table SQZT7 homodyne is now well-aligned. After Sheila re-aligned the homodyne to the screenshotted FC/ZM values, fringe visibilities are PD1 = 98.5% (loss 3.1%), PD2 = 97.8% (loss 4.2%).

We then did an NLG sweep on the homodyne, from NLG=2.4 (opo trans 20uW) to NLG=114 (opo trans 120uW). Measurements below and attached as .txt, DTT is attached, plots to follow.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

unamplified_ir = 0.0014 (H1:SQZ-OPO_IR_PD_LF_OUT_DQ with pump shuttered)

NLG = amplified / unamplified_ir (opo green pump un-shuttered)

@80uW pump trans, amplified = 0.0198 (at start, 0.0196 at end) --> NLG 0.0198/0.0014 ~ 14

@100uW pump trans, amplified = 0.0046 (at start, 0.0458 at end) --> NLG 0.046/0.0014 = 33

@120uW pump trans, amplified = 0.16 --> NLG 0.16/0.0014 = 114

@60uW pump trans, amplified = 0.011 (at start, 0.0107 at end) --> NLG = 7.86

@40uW pump trans, amplified = 0.0059 (at start, 0.0059 at end) --> NLG = 4.2

@20uW pump trans, amplified = 0.0034 (at start, --- at end) --> NLG = 2.4

trace reference opo_green_trans
(uW)
NLG SQZ dB CLF RF6 demod angles (+)
LO shot noise @ 1.106 mA, -136.3 dB 10 80 14    
Mean SQZ 11     +13  
SQZ 12     -8.0 162.0
ASQZ 13     +16 245.44
NLG=33   100 33    
Mean SQZ 14     +16.7  
SQZ 15     -8.0 170.5
ASQZ 16     +19.9 237.85
NLG = 114   120 114    
Mean SQZ 17     +22.5  
SQZ 19     -8.0 177.98
ASQZ 18     +25.6 230.13
NLG = 7.9   60 7.9    
Mean SQZ 20     +9.7  
SQZ 21     -7.7 154.28
ASQZ 22     +12.4 253.83
NLG = 4.2   40 4.2    
LO SN check 4       ~0.1dB lower?
Mean SQZ 23     +6.8  
SQZ 24     -6.3 140.6
ASQZ 25     +9.6 262.64
NLG = 2.4   20 2.4    
Mean SQZ 26     +3.8  
SQZ 27     -4.8 135.45
ASQZ 28     +6.3 -100.5
LO shot noise @ 1.06 mA, 29        

All measurements had PUMP_ISS engaged throughout; we manually tuned the ISS setpoint for different NLGs. For low NLG (20uW trans) we manually engaged ISS. LO power (shot noise) drifted ~5% over the measurement, see trends.

NLG Sweep Procedure:

DTT saved in $(userapps)/sqz/h1/Templates/dtt/HD_SQZ/HD_SQZ_8dB_101823_NLGsweep.xml

Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
victoriaa.xu@LIGO.ORG - 11:06, Thursday 19 October 2023 (73581)

Using Dhruva's nice plotting code for NLG sweeps from LHO:67242, here are some plots of squeezing vs. NLG, and calibrating the OPO lasing threshold and various green powers at this new crystal spot. Data & updated plotting code attached.

NLG sweep data summary here:

SHG Launched (mW) OPO Green Refl (mW) OPO Green Trans (uW)  NLG 
 
Mean SQZ (dB) SQZ (dB) Anti-SQZ (dB)
10.8 1 80 14 13 -8.0 16
13.3 1.3 100 33 16.7 -8.0 19.9
16 1.5 120 114 22.5 -8.0 25.6
8.4 0.8 60 7.9 9.7 -7.7 12.4
5.9 0.6 40 4.2 6.8 -6.3 9.6
3.5 0.4 20 2.4 3.8 -4.8 6.3

To-do: Look into the fits of loss & technical noise.

  • Technical noise here fits to -8.8dB below LO shot noise @ 1.1mA (-136dB, dark noise @ -159dB) -- check this is correct/real. For reference with the old homodyne PD in Feb 2023, LHO:67223 with 5.5dB sqz, technical noise fit to -9.6dB below LO shot noise @ 1.08mA (calibration suspect, HD_DIFF_DC_OUT was around -134-135dB, dark noise @ - 157dB). Would be interesting if this about -10dB technical noise below shot noise on the homodyne is real technical noise injection from the squeezer, and/or if it can be improved with upcoming squeezer laser PMC installation.
  • Loss estimate from NLG sweep - our homodyne loss budget accounts for 13% losses (after scaling back all over-estimations of losses), but this sweep fits to 7% losses, so we should resolve this over-estimated loss discrepancy.
Non-image files attached to this comment
michael.zucker@LIGO.ORG - 14:58, Thursday 19 October 2023 (73599)

Outstanding work, well done!

victoriaa.xu@LIGO.ORG - 15:29, Monday 20 November 2023 (74319)

Attached here is a re-fitting of this homodyne NLG sweep, which fits [loss, phase noise, technical noise] to measured SQZ+ASQZ, given measured NLG. It also shows the calculated loss from measured mean-sqz and NLG (which relies on accurate calibration of NLG --> generated SQZ dB). The same fitting was done for NLG sweeps on DARM the following week LHO:73747.

The previous anlaysis was fitting [phase noise, technical noise] using the loss calcuated from mean-squeezing. Compared to the earlier analysis, I think these fits here are closer. 

We budgeted 13% HD loss for this homodyne measurement:  1 - [0.985(opo) * 0.96(ham7) * 0.98(sqzt7 optics) * 0.977(HD PD QE) * 0.96((visibility~98%)**2)] = 13%.

This fit to the NLG HD sweep suggests ~11% homodyne loss, 7 mrad rms phase noise, with technical noise about -10 dB below 1.1 mW LO shot noise. Note HD dark noise is -22 dB below shot noise, suggesting mystery technical noise on the homodyne.

Images attached to this comment
Displaying reports 14161-14180 of 86325.Go to page Start 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 End