Displaying reports 1421-1440 of 82985.Go to page Start 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 End
Reports until 08:18, Friday 18 April 2025
H1 ISC (PSL, SQZ)
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:18, Friday 18 April 2025 - last comment - 08:18, Friday 18 April 2025(83978)
SPI Pick-off Path Install Day Three; Midday Report -- Power to ALS/SQZ Fiber Distribution Path Restored
J. Kissel scribe for S. Koehlenbeck, J. Freed, R. Short, and guest star J. Oberling
ECR E2400083
IIET 30642
WP 12453

Toward the end of day two of install (LHO:83961), the team set the power at the input of the ALS-FC2 by rotating ALS-HWP2, to be 50.5 [mW] (with PMC TRANS at 103.5 [W]). The reported power for the on-table ThorLabs SM1PD1A, however, measured consistently lower at "31 [mW]," lower than the goal for this PD, a reported power of "45 [mw]" (LHO:83927), when the power of the beam between ALS-M9 and ALS-FC2 was physically measured at 48.7 [mW] (with PMC TRANS at 103.0). 

We think lower reported power on the PD is related to 
(1) The slight translation of the what-used-to-be ALS-L5 to ALS-M9 beam, because of the thickness of the SPI-BS1 that was inserted into that path, and 
(2) a change in the amount of s- and p- polarization in reflection of the ALS-PBS01 after rotating ALS-HWP2 to increase the power in the ALS/SQZ/SPI path, because the polarization state of the reflection of a PBS can be power dependent.

To support (2), we measured the polarization today between ALS-M9 and ALS-FC2 with a temporary PBS and power meter. On 2025-04-17 at 19:02 UTC with PMC power at 103.7 [W], we measure
    s-pol = 49.7 [mW]
    p-pol = 1.8 [mW]
    (total = 49.7 + 1.8 = 51.5 [mW])
Regrettably, we did not measure this polarization state prior to changing anything.

However, because we've *measured* equal total power at ALS-FC2 before vs. after, we're confident that at least the total power going into ALS-FC2 is the same. 

As such, we called in Jason to help couple the beam into ALS-FC2 using ALS-M9 and what alignment screws are on ALS-FC2 itself. Attached is the trend of that process, where we used the SPI distribution chassis PD in two forms: 
    H1:ALS-C_FIBR_INTERNAL_DC_POWER         never calibrated version, used to be 0.1 [cts]
    H1:ALS-C_FIBR_INTERNAL_DC_POWERMON      version we'd been using, calibrated into [mW]

In the end, we landed with the values of these channels at 

    H1:ALS-C_FIBR_INTERNAL_DC_POWER         0.1 [cts]
    H1:ALS-C_FIBR_INTERNAL_DC_POWERMON      31.4 [mW]
which matches our goals from LHO:83927.

The team also adjusted the position of the SM1PD1A in transmission of ALS-M9 to account for (1). However, even after moving the PD out of maximum and back, they were not able to find any position where the PD readout exceeded
    H1:ALS-C_FIBR_EXTERNAL_DC_POWERMON      31.0 [mW]
This why we expect that something more like (2) is going on. Though we looked through 
    - E1300483 (doesn't list ALS-M9), 
    - E1900246 (calls the optic ALS-M6, which is not for 1064 nm in E1300483), 
    - E0900325 (isn't new enough to have this mirror), 
    - Peter King's purchase orders circa 2019 (Req 122638553 for the fiber collimator parts, and Req 122583017 for the SM1PD1A parts)
we couldn't find anything that was clearly and obviously the ALS-M9 optic, so we can't validate or reconstruction the reflectivity in each polarization to model the factor of 31 [mW] / 45 [mW] = 0.7x (or 30% drop) reported value change.
In any event, this EXTERNAL PD channel will need to be recalibrated to better reflect the real power in this path.

Also, when we re-start up anything that uses the output of the ALS / SQZ fiber distribution, it may need to be adjusted to account for the polarization change described in (2)
Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 14:52, Thursday 17 April 2025 (83980)
aLOGs where the existing calibration for these PDs came from (both are comments to the same Oct 2019 LHO:52381):
INTERNAL -- LHO:52398
EXTERNAL -- LHO:52403
H1 AOS
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:11, Thursday 17 April 2025 (83985)
Vent Schedule Status
Still on schedule!

Currently in the Stand-down in HAM1 such that the corner pump down can get to a more exercised safe state.  

Attached is a snapshot of what is planned for the next few days.  

(Things un-checked on today's list are expected to continue early next week per plan.)
Images attached to this report
H1 SUS (SUS)
rahul.kumar@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:45, Thursday 17 April 2025 - last comment - 10:00, Monday 21 April 2025(83984)
Prep work for HAM1 SUS Tip Tilt (RM1, RM2 and PM1) installation

RyanC, Rahul

SUS Tip Tilt - RM1, RM2 and PM1 (picture attached) are now ready to be installed into HAM1, once the chamber is ready to accept them. The blade springs of all three suspensions have been un-muted and bosem connectors have kapton take inserted to prevent grounding issues. This morning we cleaned all three optics using First Contact - see picture for reference.

 

PM1 Beam Dump (rear)

Camilla, Betsy, RyanC, Rahul

SUS PM1 (Tip Tilt) has a new beam dump attached to it's rear - as shown in several pictures attached below. We had to design a new plate (D2500101_V1) to attach the beam dump. I can confirm that all the components integrates well with PM1 and there is some scope for adjustability as well.

Team SUS is now ready for HAM1 installation work.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 10:00, Monday 21 April 2025 (84020)EPO

Tagging EPO for photos.

H1 PSL (ISC, PSL)
sina.koehlenbeck@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:36, Thursday 17 April 2025 - last comment - 11:44, Monday 21 April 2025(83983)
Install SPI pick-off path: Laser mode to fiber collimator

S. Koehlenbeck, J. Freed, R. Short, J. Kissel

The mode matching of the PSL pick-off beam to the SPI fiber collimator has been implemented using two lenses. The target beam has a mode radius of 550 µm at a position 63.5 cm downstream from the SPI beamsplitter (SPI-BS).

The lens configuration that produced the closest match to the target mode used:

Attached is a beam profile fit performed using JaMMT on data acquired with a WinCamD of the beam after SPI-L2. The measured beam radii at various distances from the SPI-BS are as follows:

Distance (cm) Horizontal Radius (µm) Vertical Radius (µm)
70.734 476 542
91.054 470 543.5
116.454 558.5 616.5

Both lenses are oriented such that their planar sides face the small beam waist between the two lenses. The arrows on the lens mounts point toward the convex surfaces.

The power transmission through the fiber has been measured to be 83 %.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 10:35, Friday 18 April 2025 (83995)ISC, SEI, SQZ, SYS
ECR E2400083
IIET 30642
WP 12453


Some "for the record" additional comments here:
- Sina refers to the "SPI-BS" above, which is the same as what we've now officially dubbed as "SPI-BS1."

- Lenses were identified to be needed after the initial measurement of the beam profile emanating from SPI-BS1. That initial beam profile measurement is cited in LHO:83956, and the lens also developed in JaMMT with the lenses that were available from the optics lab / PSL inventory.

- If anyone's trying to recreate the model of the beam profile from the two measurements (LHO:83956 with no lenses, and the above LHO:83983) just note that the "zero" position is different in the quoted raw data; in LHO:83956 is the front of the rail, on Column 159 of the table, and in LHO:83983 the zero position is the SPI-BS1 reflective surface which is on Column 149 of the table, i.e. a 10 inch = 25.4 cm difference.

- The real SPI-L1 installed to create this mode-shape / beam profile is labeled by its radius of curvature, which is R = 51.5 mm, and thus its focal length is more precisely f = R*2 = 103 mm. (We did find a lens that does have f = 60 mm for SPI-L2, and it's labeled by its focal length.)

- "the fiber" is that which is intended for permanent use, depicted as SPI_PSL_001 in the SPI optical fiber routing diagram D2400110, a Narrow Key PM-980 Optical Fiber "patch cord" from Diamond, whose length is 30 [m]. This fiber will run all the way out to SUS-R2, eventually, to be connected as the input to the SPI Laser Prep Chassis (D2400156).

- Per design, light going into this fiber is entirely p-pol, due to polarization via SPI-HWP1 and clean-up by SPI-PBS01 just upstream. We did not measure the polarization state of the light exiting the fiber.

- The raw data that informs the statement that "the power transmission thru the fiber has been measured to be 83%":
     : We measured the input to the fiber coupler, SPI-FC1, via the S140C low-power power meter we'd been using throughout the install. The output power was measured via a fiber-coupled power meter Sina had brought with her from Stanford (dunno the make of that one).

     : We measured the power input to the fiber twice several hours apart (with the change in fiber input power controlled via the SPI-HWP1 / SPI-PBS01 combo).,
         (1) 19.9 [mW] with PMC TRANS power at 104.1 [W] at 2025-04-17 16:35 UTC (while the PMC power was in flux from enviromental controls turn on)
         (2) 180 [mW] with PMC TRANS power at 103.5 [W] at 2025-04-17 14:00 UTC (while the PMC power was quite stable)

     : We measured the output power
         (1') 16.6 [mW] with PMC TRANS power at 103.7 [W] at 2025-04-17 17:35 UTC (an hour later than (1))
         (2') 150 [mW] with PMC TRANS power at 103.5 [W] at 2025-04-17 14:00 UTC (simultaneous to (2))

     : Thus derive the transmission to be 
         (1'') (16.6 / 19.9) * (104.1/103.7) = 0.837 = 83.7% and 
         (2'') (150 / 180) * (103.5/103.5) = 0.833 = 83.3%
sina.koehlenbeck@LIGO.ORG - 11:44, Monday 21 April 2025 (84025)

In the attachment you will find the JAMMT model for the measured beam profile of the PSL pick off with the origin a SPI-BS1, as well as the lenses used to adjust the mode of the beam for the fiber collimator FC60-SF-4-A6.2-03.

Images attached to this comment
H1 SEI
anthony.sanchez@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:12, Thursday 17 April 2025 (83981)
Monthly Hepi trends

FAMIS 27813
HEPI trends for the last month.

The sudden drop in the HEPI trends happened on the same day at the same time as the Power outage .

The last week can be see here and looks good except for today which show multiple DAQ restarts.

Images attached to this report
H1 SUS (SEI)
brian.lantz@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:00, Thursday 17 April 2025 (83982)
OSEM estimator basic testing

Brian, Oli, Edgard

Testing the implementation of the OSEM estimator installed on SR3. The models were installed on Monday. We don't have the model transfer functions yet. We were testing the basic OSEM path and the switch. We were testing SR3 YAW. It all looks good so far - the OSEM signal is getting to where it should be, and fader-switch is working correctly.

-- detailed testing notes --

ISI is damped. vacuum is still pumping pressure is ~16 torr. Looks like the suspension is still moving because of temperature changes so we can't do useful TFs yet.
GPS time 14289 57082
Look at the drive level of the classic damper, the pk-pk with normal damping is about  -0.04 to +0.04

channels all start with H1:SUS-SR3_

Look at channels: M1_YAW_DAMP_EST_OUTPUT,  M1_YAM_DAMP_OSEM_OUTPUT,  M1_YAW_DAMP_SIGMON, M1_DAMP_Y_OUTPUT,  M1_DAMP_Y_IN1

Y osem damper gain is -0.5 instead of -1.0.  Gabriele changed this.

Test 1 - are the OSEM signals getting to the OSEM path, and is the damper control set correctly? - YES!

Set the YAW_DAMP_OSEM filter bank to be the same at the DAMP_Y bank
The output switch for the estimator is OFF - so the OUTPUT signal from the YAW_DAMP_OSEM filter does not get to the osem drives

Output signals of the 2 damping controllers should be the same - and they do look the same. Put them on top of each other and they seem identical

Test 2 - use the classic damping and the YAW_OSEM path, does it work? - Yes!

1. set the YAM_DAMP_OSEM gain to -0.4 (from -0.5)
2. set the classic damping gain to -0.1 (from -0.5)  (so 20% of the gain is in the classic path, 80% in the estimator path)

gps time ~...58716, Turn on the estimator. This should recover the previous normal damping.
Switch looks smooth - no glitching, no drama. comes on well
The drive levels look like 4 to 1 by eye (correct). total drive looks about the same as before.

Turn off estim path at ...58900 ish. OSEM input signal doesn't look any different (gah, really?!, of course not, it's all sensor noise)

Test 2 successful - switch seems smooth, damping paths look good

Test 3 - test the switch between OSEM path and Estimator path - is it smooth and well behaved? - YES!

Set Estim damping control to be the same as the OSEM damping control.

Set the OSEM Bandpass to 1 so OSEM_DAMPER and ESTIM_DAMPER inputs should match (they do) and the outputs should match (they do).

these three signals should all be the same now during the switch from OSEM to Estim
M1_YAW_DAMP_SIGMON (this is the switch output)
M1_YAW_DAMP_OSEM_OUTPUT  (first input)
M1_YAW_DAMP_EST_OUTPUT  (second input)
start around 59720 -

then switch back and forth several times - these signals all stay on top of each other and are indistinguishable.

GPS is about ...60100
Zoom in for a close look at the start and stop of the fade to look for glitching - I don't see any, see plot in comment.
Test3 - success - by eye we can no see any difference in the 3 channels.

H1 SQZ
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:44, Thursday 17 April 2025 (83953)
revisting arm power bounds from squeezing: 310kW- 353kW

In 82097 we got some constraint on the circulating power in the arm from the squeezer data set.  I'm working on looking at the data that Camilla took in 83660, and realize that with the higher nonlinear gain the frequency independent squeezing gives us a better constraint on the arm power.

Using known injection losses of 8.2%(google sheet),   and  6% extra HAM7 losses from 83070 gives 13.7% minimum injection losses for squeezing, and our known readout losses are 8.4%.  Based on 16.1dB of anti squeezing (for NLG of 19 as reported by Camilla) and -4.97 dB squeezing, the infered NLG is 18.7 and the total sqz efficiency is 0.694 (with 0 phase noise). This means that in addition to the 6% extra losses measured on the homodyne, we have another 12% unknown squeezer losses.  We can assign those 12.2% losses to either injection losses (unlikely since there isn't much between homodyne pick off point and injection into the OFI), readout losses that also impact the IFO readout, or squeezer readout losses that don't impact the IFO (SQZ to OMC mode matching). 

If the only IFO readout losses are the known losses, the IFO readout efficiency is 91.6%, and we can use the shot noise level without squeezing injected to estimate that the minimum arm power is 310kW.  Using the total squeezer efficiency and the known losses, we can place bounds on the readout efficiency between 80.4% and 91.6%.  The level of shot noise measured without squeezing mostly depends on arm power and readout efficiency, so this maximum readout efficiency gives us a minimum arm power of 310kW (all squeezer losses are injection losses, readout efficiency is 91.6% and arm power is minimum), while the minimum readout efficiency gives us 353kW (all unknown squeezer losses are common to IFO, which probably wouldn't be the case for mode mismatches). 

Images attached to this report
X1 SUS (SUS)
rahul.kumar@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:55, Thursday 17 April 2025 (83977)
A+ O5 HRTS (suspended configuration L1BHDM1) being transported from LHO to LLO

Ryan C, Rahul

L1BHDM1 which is the suspended configuration of HRTS (HAM Relay Triple Suspension) for O5 is now ready to be shipped to LLO (using ground freight). The suspension (all stages locked with EQ stops, torqued double nuts and tension removed from wires ) has been wrapped in several layers of clean foil/clean cloth and clean bag as shown here.

This shipment is expected to reach LLO sometime at the end of next week (25th April), if it leaves LHO today. The details of the shipment are given below,

Tracking Site Link: https://www.shipdbi.com/ HWB Number for TRK: 139289

FRS ticket - https://services1.ligo-la.caltech.edu/FRS/show_bug.cgi?id=33849

ICS (assembly record) - https://ics.ligo-la.caltech.edu/JIRA/browse/ASSY-D1900449-L1BHDM1

ICS (shipment load) - https://ics.ligo-la.caltech.edu/JIRA/browse/Shipment-13842

This is first of the total six HRTS which will be transported to LLO.

Images attached to this report
H1 CDS
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:11, Thursday 17 April 2025 - last comment - 16:13, Thursday 17 April 2025(83973)
h1isiham1 model restarts, DAQ restarts

Jim, Tony, Dave:

We restarted h1isiham1 model four times and the DAQ twice:

1. Internal wiring change to model, no DAQ retstart for that but new common part with "missing ADC chans" fix was included which did require a DAQ restart. No issues with DAQ restart other than gds0 needed a second restart.

2. A copy-paste binary parts issue was found, HAM6 parts were included in HAM1. BIO parts were renamed, no DAQ restart was neeed.

3. HAM1 differs from HAM6 in BIO inputs in that it reads 64 input channels instead of just 32. Upper32 channel BIO part was added, which added slow channels, so DAQ restart was required. No issues with DAQ restart other than gds0 second restart.

4. To minimize binary chassis hardware, HAM1 and HAM6 share the first BIO card's binary output chassis, HAM6 uses lower 32 chans, HAM1 uses upper 32 chans. h1isimodel was changed to use BIO-0 U32 for outputs. No DAQ restart was required.

Current BIO hardware as see by models:

wiring input block model   model output block wiring
from ham6 BIO-0 low 32 h1isiham6   h1isiham6 BIO-0 low 32 to ham6
not connected BIO-0 high 32 none   h1isiham1 BIO-0 high 32 to ham1
             
from ham1 BIO-1 low 32 h1isiham1   none BIO-1 low 32 no chassis
from ham1 BIO-1 high 32 h1isiham1   none BIO-1 high 32 no chassis

 

Comments related to this report
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - 11:27, Thursday 17 April 2025 (83974)

DAQ Changes

1st DAQ restart (correct missing ADC chans)

++: slow channel H1:ISI-HAM1_PMON_GS13_P3_CTS added to the DAQ
++: slow channel H1:ISI-HAM1_PMON_GS13_P2_CTS added to the DAQ
++: slow channel H1:ISI-HAM1_PMON_GS13_P1_CTS added to the DAQ
++: slow channel H1:ISI-HAM1_PMON_GS13_D3_CTS added to the DAQ
++: slow channel H1:ISI-HAM1_PMON_GS13_D2_CTS added to the DAQ
++: slow channel H1:ISI-HAM1_PMON_GS13_D1_CTS added to the DAQ
++: slow channel H1:ISI-HAM1_PMON_FF_L4C_P3_CTS added to the DAQ
++: slow channel H1:ISI-HAM1_PMON_FF_L4C_P2_CTS added to the DAQ
++: slow channel H1:ISI-HAM1_PMON_FF_L4C_P1_CTS added to the DAQ
++: slow channel H1:ISI-HAM1_PMON_FF_L4C_D3_CTS added to the DAQ
++: slow channel H1:ISI-HAM1_PMON_FF_L4C_D2_CTS added to the DAQ
++: slow channel H1:ISI-HAM1_PMON_FF_L4C_D1_CTS added to the DAQ
 

2nd DAQ restart (read H32 BIO-1 channels)

++: slow channel H1:ISI-HAM1_BIO_IN_GAIN_L4C_H1_RB added to the DAQ
++: slow channel H1:ISI-HAM1_BIO_IN_GAIN_L4C_H2_RB added to the DAQ
++: slow channel H1:ISI-HAM1_BIO_IN_GAIN_L4C_H3_RB added to the DAQ
++: slow channel H1:ISI-HAM1_BIO_IN_GAIN_L4C_V1_RB added to the DAQ
++: slow channel H1:ISI-HAM1_BIO_IN_GAIN_L4C_V2_RB added to the DAQ
++: slow channel H1:ISI-HAM1_BIO_IN_GAIN_L4C_V3_RB added to the DAQ
++: slow channel H1:ISI-HAM1_BIO_IN_INMON2 added to the DAQ
++: slow channel H1:ISI-HAM1_BIO_IN_TEST2 added to the DAQ
++: slow channel H1:ISI-HAM1_BIO_IN_TESTMON2 added to the DAQ
++: slow channel H1:ISI-HAM1_BIO_IN_WHT_L4C_H1_RB added to the DAQ
++: slow channel H1:ISI-HAM1_BIO_IN_WHT_L4C_H2_RB added to the DAQ
++: slow channel H1:ISI-HAM1_BIO_IN_WHT_L4C_H3_RB added to the DAQ
++: slow channel H1:ISI-HAM1_BIO_IN_WHT_L4C_V1_RB added to the DAQ
++: slow channel H1:ISI-HAM1_BIO_IN_WHT_L4C_V2_RB added to the DAQ
++: slow channel H1:ISI-HAM1_BIO_IN_WHT_L4C_V3_RB added to the DAQ
 

david.barker@LIGO.ORG - 11:31, Thursday 17 April 2025 (83975)

Thu17Apr2025
LOC TIME HOSTNAME     MODEL/REBOOT
09:09:41 h1seih16     h1isiham1   <<< model restart, fix wiring, add missing-adc-chans
09:12:10 h1daqdc0     [DAQ] <<< 0-leg
09:12:20 h1daqfw0     [DAQ]
09:12:21 h1daqtw0     [DAQ]
09:12:22 h1daqnds0    [DAQ]
09:12:29 h1daqgds0    [DAQ]
09:13:19 h1daqgds0    [DAQ] <<< 2nd gds0 restart
09:16:23 h1daqdc1     [DAQ]
09:16:33 h1daqfw1     [DAQ] <<< 1-lde
09:16:34 h1daqtw1     [DAQ]
09:16:35 h1daqnds1    [DAQ]
09:16:44 h1daqgds1    [DAQ]
10:10:21 h1seih16     h1isiham1   <<< model restart, change bio address
10:27:28 h1seih16     h1isiham1   <<< model restart, add BIO-1 H32
10:32:12 h1daqdc0     [DAQ] <<< 0-leg
10:32:23 h1daqfw0     [DAQ]
10:32:24 h1daqtw0     [DAQ]
10:32:26 h1daqnds0    [DAQ]
10:32:32 h1daqgds0    [DAQ]
10:35:28 h1daqgds0    [DAQ] <<< 2nd gds0 restart
10:36:21 h1daqdc1     [DAQ] <<< 1-leg
10:36:32 h1daqfw1     [DAQ]
10:36:32 h1daqtw1     [DAQ]
10:36:34 h1daqnds1    [DAQ]
10:36:42 h1daqgds1    [DAQ]
10:57:48 h1seih16     h1isiham1   <<< model restart, drive BIO-0 H32
 

david.barker@LIGO.ORG - 16:13, Thursday 17 April 2025 (83986)

Two more h1isiham1 model restarts, the first with an associated DAQ restart.

14:35 h1isiham1 binary output block was upgraded, adding slow channels to the DAQ. During DAQ restart gds0 and gds1 needed second restarts.

15:53 h1isiham1 input bus selector to binary output block was corrected, no DAQ restart needed.

14:35:41 h1seih16     h1isiham1   <<< new binary output block
14:37:30 h1daqdc0     [DAQ] << 0leg
14:37:40 h1daqfw0     [DAQ]
14:37:40 h1daqtw0     [DAQ]
14:37:41 h1daqnds0    [DAQ]
14:37:48 h1daqgds0    [DAQ]
14:38:22 h1daqgds0    [DAQ] <<< 2nd gds0 restart
14:41:43 h1daqdc1     [DAQ] <<< 1leg
14:41:54 h1daqfw1     [DAQ]
14:41:54 h1daqtw1     [DAQ]
14:41:55 h1daqnds1    [DAQ]
14:42:03 h1daqgds1    [DAQ]
14:43:00 h1daqgds1    [DAQ] <<< 2nd gds1 restart
15:53:57 h1seih16     h1isiham1   <<< correct input bus of binary output block
 

LHO VE
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:45, Thursday 17 April 2025 (83972)
Thu CP1 Fill

Thu Apr 17 10:09:38 2025 INFO: Fill completed in 9min 34secs

 

Images attached to this report
LHO VE
janos.csizmazia@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:01, Thursday 17 April 2025 - last comment - 13:09, Wednesday 30 April 2025(83969)
2025 April vent - VAC diary
Late entry

4-16 (Wednesday) activities:
- The previously received, poorly packaged Inficon gauge has been tested, and found functional. These tests continue, and also the HAM1 vacuum interlock gauge will be installed soon
- The BSC8 Annulus Ion Pump - after some aux cart pumping - is now able to hold the annulus pressure, at the mid- E-6 Torr region
- The rough pumpdown of the corner has started at 16:20, at the OMC turbo station, with a pair of ISP-1000 mobile pumping carts. In 4 hours, ~185 Torr was achieved, which means 1930 l/s effective pumping speed, which well corresponds with the 2000 l/s theoretical speed of the pumps
- The rough pumping still needs to be terminated in the end of the days, and so it was at 20:20
- All the turbo stations have been prepared for the HV pumping at the corner
Comments related to this report
janos.csizmazia@LIGO.ORG - 13:09, Wednesday 30 April 2025 (84203)
The dew point of the blow-off air was -15 deg C.
H1 SEI
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:44, Thursday 17 April 2025 (83968)
ISI CPS Noise Spectra Check Weekly FAMIS

Closes FAMIS26039 , last checked in alog83802

Most of the HAMs looks more elevated than last time, due to the vent activities.

The BSCs look the same as when they were last checked.

Non-image files attached to this report
H1 General
anthony.sanchez@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:44, Thursday 17 April 2025 (83967)
Thursday Ops morning report

TITLE: 04/17 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
OUTGOING OPERATOR: None
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: MAINTENANCE
    Wind: 5mph Gusts, 3mph 3min avg
    Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.20 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
VAC team have been Pumping down the corner station volume for 15 hours now and H0:VAC-LX_Y2_PT180_MOD1_PRESS_TORR channel is reporting that we are below 200 torr in BSC8 chamber.

Expected work today:

 

H1 CDS
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:35, Thursday 17 April 2025 (83966)
Model changes to fix missing ADC channels in MEDM

For each ADC a user model uses the RCG generates an ADC MEDM showing the raw counts for only those channels the model connects to. In order to make this MEDM more useful, for each channel the RCG attempts to find a named part in the simulink mdl and adds that name to the MEDM.

If the first simulink part found when traversing the model does not have a name (e.g. is a summation, gain, multiplier, etc.) currently the RCG leaves this channel off the MEDM. Future RCG versions will fix this by adding generic ADC names, but in the mean time we are taking the vent RCG upgrade as an opportunity to install named EPICS_OUTPUT parts where needed. Ideally the subsystem authors would give these parts descriptive names, but failing that we will give them generic ADC_x_y type names.

Jim has done this for the ISI HAM models, so when we restarted h1isiham2 and h1isiham5 on monday those models' ADC MEDMs were corrected. The attachment shows the ADC MEDMs for h1isiham2 (full) compared with h1isiham3 (partial).

Images attached to this report
H1 PSL
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:03, Wednesday 16 April 2025 - last comment - 11:35, Monday 21 April 2025(83961)
SPi Pickoff Path Install Day Two
J. Kissel scribing for S. Koehlenbeck, J. Oberling, R. Short, J. Freed
ECR E2400083
IIET 30642
WP 12453

Another quick summary aLOG at the end of the day, with more details to come:
- With the power in the ALS/SQZ pick-off path to 10 [mW] for beam profiling,
- Installed a two lens system to handle the unexpectedly different beam profile of the ALS/SQZ pick-off path
- Remeasured the resulting mode after the two lens system, and we're happy enough. We're gunna call them SPI-L1 and SPI-L2.
- Installed steering mirrors SPI-M1 and SPI-M2.
- Rotated ALS-HWP2 to increase the s-pol light in the ALS/SQZ/SPI path to return the power transmitted through SPI-BS1 going to the ALS/SQZ fiber collimator back to 50.5 [mW]. This set the SPI path to 186 [mW] with the PMC TRANS measured at 103.5 [W]. The ALS_EXTERNAL PD in transmission of ALS-M9 measured 31 [mW] ***. 
- Installed SPI-HWP1 and SPI-PBS01
- Measured the power at each port of SPI-PBS01, with the intent to optimize the SPI-HWP1 position to yield maximum p-pol transmission through SPI-PBS01.

*** We expect this is lower than the goal of ~45 [mW] (from LHO:83927) because we've not yet re-aligned the ALS/SQZ fiber collimator path after the install of the SPI-BS1, which translates the beam a bit due to the thickness of the beam splitter. We intend to get back to this once we're happy with the SPI path.
Comments related to this report
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - 17:54, Wednesday 16 April 2025 (83965)

Small correction to above is after installing SPI-HWP1 and SPI-PBS01, we adjusted HWP1 to have 20mW in transmission of PBS1 (not maximum quite yet) to start alignment into the fiber. Using the two steering mirrors downstream of PBS1 and the collimating lens in front of the fiber, Sina maximized the transmission as measured with the output of the fiber on a spare PD. We then took power measurements of the input and output of the fiber:

  • Input: 19.4mW
  • Output: 13.5mW
  • Transmission ratio: 72.1%

This is a good start, but with a target ratio of >80%, there's still more work to be done here improving the beam into the fiber collimator. Out current mode-matching solution claims we should have 95% mode overlap into the fiber, so hopefully the issue is alignment, but it's entirely possible we'll revisit the mode-matching to see if improvements can be made there too.

The attached photo represents the optical layout as it stands as of where we stopped today, with the new SPI fiber in blue on the left (north) side of the table.

Images attached to this comment
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 12:10, Thursday 17 April 2025 (83976)ISC, SQZ, SYS
Re-post of Ryan's picture at the end of day 2, labeled with the almost entirely complete SPI pick-off path.

Critically here, this shows the PSL row/column grid, confirming that this whole ECR E1900246 ALS pick-off path is 2 rows "higher" in +Y than is indicated on the current version of the as built PSL drawing D1300348-v8.
Images attached to this comment
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 11:35, Monday 21 April 2025 (84024)
Ryan grabbed another picture I attach here. This shows the ALS pick-off path on this day in order to support the identification that the beamline between ALS-M1, through the faraday ALS-FI1 and ALS-L1, etc stopping at ALS-M2 (not pictured) is on row 25 of the PSL table *not* row 23 as drawn in D1300348-v8. I attach both the raw picture and my labeled version. So, ya, ALS-M1 should have its HR surface centered on Row 25, Col 117.

Note, the grid in the picture is labeling bolt holes. Because the optical elements are all ~4 inches above the table, the beams appear offset from the way they travel on along the grid given that the photo was taken at a bit of an angle from vertical. May the future updater of D1300348 bear this in mind.

Images attached to this comment
LHO VE
janos.csizmazia@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:05, Wednesday 16 April 2025 - last comment - 10:40, Thursday 17 April 2025(83951)
Intentional pressure spike at the X-manifold
Janos - 9:50, LVEA

The X-manifold is valved out from the main volume both sides, the main turbo is pumping on it.
On the X-manifold I slightly opened up the suspicious blanked-off small Varian gate valve (see photo), to find out if it is opened or closed.
I moved very slowly the hand-actuator, and the pressure spiked up to the E-5s, then it immediately started to go down, now it is already at ~3E-7 (the initial value was ~1E-7).
So, the valve was closed and blanked off, therefore it wasn't stored appropriately, thus at the next opportunity (when the X-manifold will be vented), it will be removed, and blanked off.
Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
janos.csizmazia@LIGO.ORG - 10:40, Thursday 17 April 2025 (83971)
The handler of this valve was torqued, and the pressure in the X-manifold fell to 8.14E-8 Torr, and it is seemingly stabilized. Before poking with this valve, the pressure was 1.04E-7 Torr (and still rising), so there was indeed a leak from this valve to the system, as this torquing means ~20% reduce in gas load.
We do a comprehensive leak check on the X-manifold during the rest of the week, so this valve with all adjacent flanges will be bagged and leak checked.
We are also considering putting an adapter on the valve instead of a blank, and pump it down, so the lower pressure in the outer side of the valve could help, if there is still some communication between the valve and the system - but of course, it depends on the result of the leak check.

Finally, the handler of this valve was LOTO-d - it was simply taken off, so there will be no accidental moving of this valve anymore.
Images attached to this comment
H1 PSL (ISC, PSL)
georgia.mansell@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:55, Thursday 03 October 2019 - last comment - 09:29, Thursday 17 April 2025(52292)
ALS pick-off update

Jason O, Georgia M

 

ECR 1900246

 

This week we have been in the PSL installing a new fiber pick-off for the ALS and squeezer lasers. The old pick off is on transmission of the reference cavity while the new one is on the ALS bypass, after the PMC. Peter K started this work a month ago (alog 51610).

 

We currently have installed a mode matching lens (f=200mm f=150mm) between the beam splitter and the steering mirror, and achieved ~73% ~82% power transmission through the fiber so far.

 

We think we can get more light through the fiber by tweaking the mode matching lens position. We will need to go back into the PSL again to finish this work and feed the fiber and photodiode cable out to the rack. 

 

Once the layout is finalised I'll update the psl table layout document (D1300348).

 

Modifications to the fiber distribution box are also ongoing.

Comments related to this report
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 12:38, Wednesday 16 April 2025 (83957)
J. Kissel for J. Oberling

As we work through the history of the ALS pick-off path in order to augment it and create an SPI pick-off path within (ECR E2400083), Jason shared a screenshot of his beam-profile model from JAMMT when he suggested placement of ALS-L5 (the f=150 mm lens mentioned abov). I post it here for historical reference.

For the record the fiber collimator used in the ALS/SQZ distribution pick-off is a Thor Labs F220 APC-1064.
Images attached to this comment
jason.oberling@LIGO.ORG - 13:18, Wednesday 16 April 2025 (83958)

So there is clarity here for future reference, I created that quick-and-dirty JamMT model from the as-built LHO PSL table layout in March 2024, not when the ALS pickoff was installed in October 2019.

Further, the SPI pickoff install team discovered that the as-built PSL table layout has had an error in the ALS beam path since the IO side of the PSL table was installed during aLIGO PSL installation in the 2012 timeframe.  The beam line from ALS-M1 to ALS-M2 is misplaced on the as-built layout; the layout shows the beam line along table row 23 but in reality it is along table row 25, 2 inches further +Y (using the IFO coordinate axes) than the layout indicates.  Corey took pictures of the PSL table in 2013 (D1301029) that show ALS-M1 in line with the 2nd ISS turning mirror, which is along table row 25.  Because of this the distances shown on the JamMT model are too short by 2 inches, rendering the beam waist size and location results given by that model incorrect.  In addition, the overall ALS path is longer by 4 inches than the as-built layout implies. 

I will correct this when I update the PSL as-built layout after the SPI team is done.

jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 09:29, Thursday 17 April 2025 (83970)
Right! The mode-matching model that Georgia put together can be found in an other file in the ECR E1900246, specifically PMCtoFiberMM.png.
Displaying reports 1421-1440 of 82985.Go to page Start 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 End