TITLE: 01/07 Eve Shift: 00:00-08:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 163Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Ryan C
SHIFT SUMMARY: Once our locking issues were addressed after being worked on during the previous shift, smooth sailing back to observing for most of the evening.
Lockloss @ 03:05 UTC - 2:00 into lock stretch, no obvious cause.
Things were running smoothly once H1 locked after fixing the TRANSITION_FROM_ETMX lockloss issues, so I'm unsure the cause of this one. LSC-DARM showed first motion.
Back to observing at 04:08 UTC
TITLE: 01/07 Day Shift: 16:00-00:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Microseism
INCOMING OPERATOR: Ryan S
SHIFT SUMMARY:
IFO is still LOCKING and has been down due to microseism and troubleshooting
Update on ETMX Transition failures:
After a lot of investigation with Shela, we may have found the issue, and Ryan S is going to see if we are able to get to observing.
In short, we think that a cal line filter was incorrectly accepted to be on in the safe.snap SDF table. Additionally, Sheila added a new "missing filter" that was in the supposedly identical L1 Lock filter for EX/EY but was not in EY.
The investigation, details and screenshots are found in alog 75225
LOG:
None
Sheila, Ryan S, Ibrahim
Continuation of Transition from EX Failures - The Lockloss causing state
Expanding on the point about the ETMX ESD calibration lines being on, first noticed by Sheila:
The ETMX cal lines should be off for all of lock acquisition up until the TURN_ON_CALIBRATION_LINES state (and turned off while in NLN_CAL_MEAS). However, these were being turned back on during SDF_REVERT after a lockloss as they had been incorrectly accepted as on in the h1susetmx SAFE.snap SDF table. Interestingly, it looks like these were not turned off for some reason when going to NLN_CAL_MEAS during the commissioning time yesterday (see attached ndscope; perhaps contributing to problems mentioned in alog75204?). During this lock acquisition, I set the ETMX L3 cal line gains back to zero and accepted them in SDF (screenshot attached). This appears to have fixed the problem with locklosses during TRANSITION_FROM_ETMX which have been plaguing us since yesterday, as H1 has just reached low noise and started observing.
Thanks to Ibrahim and Ryan for following up on these problems and aloging this.
Two things to add to what Ibrahim said about the EY filter: I plotted (and looked at) only one quadrant of the PUM drive in the screenshots, which was close to saturating the 20 bit DAC on EY L2, but not quite saturating. Since the PUM also gets ASC signals all 4 quadrants get somewhat different signals and probably one of the unplotted quadrants is what saturated and caused the locklosses.
The filter which was missing from EY in TRANSITION_FROM_ETMX is called muBoost, and is meant to offload the microseism drive from the PUM to L1. It is in FM4 in ETMY L1 LOCK and FM2 in ETMX L1 LOCK. This seems to have been an oversight, which has probably been this way for quite a while. FM4 is already turned on in the LOWNOISE_ESD_ETMY state. I've just now committed ISC_LOCK to the svn revision 27023.
This has probably been an ocassional problem for a long time, but the combination of more ground motion due to wind and microseism and having the calibration line on with the linearization on while the bias ramps down made this state not work at all.
The problem with the calibration line is that it passes through the linearization for the ESD which we only use in the high noise high range ESD configuration. As we ramp the bias to zero in order to switch the ESD driver to low noise, if the calibration line is on the linearization does some large and strange things, which have been a cause of locklosses in the past.
TITLE: 01/06 Eve Shift: 00:00-08:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Microseism
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Ibrahim
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
SEI_ENV state: CALM
Wind: 14mph Gusts, 9mph 5min avg
Primary useism: 0.07 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.65 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
Troubleshooting is continuing for the locklosses at the TRANSITION_FROM_ETMX state. Wind and secondary microseism are still very high.
Closes FAMIS 26225
Laser Status:
NPRO output power is 1.819W (nominal ~2W)
AMP1 output power is 67.9W (nominal ~70W)
AMP2 output power is 137.5W (nominal 135-140W)
NPRO watchdog is GREEN
AMP1 watchdog is GREEN
AMP2 watchdog is GREEN
PMC:
It has been locked 30 days, 23 hr 15 minutes
Reflected power = 16.9W
Transmitted power = 109.4W
PowerSum = 126.3W
FSS:
It has been locked for 0 days 0 hr and 30 min
TPD[V] = 0.9213V
ISS:
The diffracted power is around 2.2%
Last saturation event was 0 days 1 hours and 43 minutes ago
Possible Issues: None
Closes FAMIS 26485
T240 Centering
2024-01-06 13:24:12.266253
There are 11 T240 proof masses out of range ( > 0.3 [V] )!
ITMX T240 1 DOF X/U = -0.891 [V]
ITMX T240 1 DOF Y/V = 0.448 [V]
ITMX T240 1 DOF Z/W = 0.545 [V]
ITMX T240 2 DOF Y/V = 0.354 [V]
ITMX T240 2 DOF Z/W = 0.387 [V]
ITMX T240 3 DOF X/U = -0.913 [V]
ITMY T240 3 DOF X/U = -0.394 [V]
ITMY T240 3 DOF Z/W = -1.336 [V]
BS T240 3 DOF Z/W = -0.353 [V]
HAM8 1 DOF X/U = -0.34 [V]
HAM8 1 DOF Z/W = -0.526 [V]
All other proof masses are within range ( < 0.3 [V] ):
ETMX T240 1 DOF X/U = 0.04 [V]
ETMX T240 1 DOF Y/V = 0.032 [V]
ETMX T240 1 DOF Z/W = 0.018 [V]
ETMX T240 2 DOF X/U = 0.014 [V]
ETMX T240 2 DOF Y/V = -0.009 [V]
ETMX T240 2 DOF Z/W = 0.07 [V]
ETMX T240 3 DOF X/U = 0.043 [V]
ETMX T240 3 DOF Y/V = -0.036 [V]
ETMX T240 3 DOF Z/W = 0.049 [V]
ETMY T240 1 DOF X/U = 0.147 [V]
ETMY T240 1 DOF Y/V = 0.191 [V]
ETMY T240 1 DOF Z/W = 0.259 [V]
ETMY T240 2 DOF X/U = -0.007 [V]
ETMY T240 2 DOF Y/V = 0.231 [V]
ETMY T240 2 DOF Z/W = 0.116 [V]
ETMY T240 3 DOF X/U = 0.281 [V]
ETMY T240 3 DOF Y/V = 0.182 [V]
ETMY T240 3 DOF Z/W = 0.204 [V]
ITMX T240 2 DOF X/U = 0.256 [V]
ITMX T240 3 DOF Y/V = 0.27 [V]
ITMX T240 3 DOF Z/W = 0.208 [V]
ITMY T240 1 DOF X/U = 0.188 [V]
ITMY T240 1 DOF Y/V = 0.169 [V]
ITMY T240 1 DOF Z/W = 0.058 [V]
ITMY T240 2 DOF X/U = 0.111 [V]
ITMY T240 2 DOF Y/V = 0.252 [V]
ITMY T240 2 DOF Z/W = 0.199 [V]
ITMY T240 3 DOF Y/V = 0.151 [V]
BS T240 1 DOF X/U = -0.097 [V]
BS T240 1 DOF Y/V = -0.281 [V]
BS T240 1 DOF Z/W = 0.19 [V]
BS T240 2 DOF X/U = 0.018 [V]
BS T240 2 DOF Y/V = 0.103 [V]
BS T240 2 DOF Z/W = -0.039 [V]
BS T240 3 DOF X/U = -0.09 [V]
BS T240 3 DOF Y/V = -0.262 [V]
HAM8 1 DOF Y/V = -0.291 [V]
Assessment complete.
STS Centering
2024-01-06 13:28:25.261111
There are 2 STS proof masses out of range ( > 2.0 [V] )!
STS EY DOF X/U = -4.117 [V]
STS EY DOF Z/W = 2.8 [V]
All other proof masses are within range ( < 2.0 [V] ):
STS A DOF X/U = -0.551 [V]
STS A DOF Y/V = -0.899 [V]
STS A DOF Z/W = -0.466 [V]
STS B DOF X/U = 0.462 [V]
STS B DOF Y/V = 0.913 [V]
STS B DOF Z/W = -0.433 [V]
STS C DOF X/U = -0.613 [V]
STS C DOF Y/V = 0.798 [V]
STS C DOF Z/W = 0.393 [V]
STS EX DOF X/U = -0.151 [V]
STS EX DOF Y/V = 0.032 [V]
STS EX DOF Z/W = 0.079 [V]
STS EY DOF Y/V = 0.19 [V]
STS FC DOF X/U = 0.269 [V]
STS FC DOF Y/V = -0.931 [V]
STS FC DOF Z/W = 0.725 [V]
Assessment complete.
IFO is LOCKING but losing lock at TRANSITION_FROM_ETMX (probably due to high wind/microseism)
MX VEA Temperature Investigation:
GraceDB Query Failures
Transition from EX Failures - The Lockloss causing state (alog 75215)
Minor:
Notes to self on transition from etmx locklosses we've been having recently (6 Jan 2024), and other lockloss investigations.
POP18 looks quite wobbly. Do we have clipping again? Haven't really checked anything w.r.t. this, so perhaps something to come back to.
A few weeks ago, we'd been having trouble with ALSX noticing that it was locked, so we renormalized it's PD around noon Pacific on 13 Dec 2023. The next lock, it already looked like the renorm was unneccessary, ALSX trans was about 1.15. Stayed at that level over many locks for many days.
Dec 20th 02:15 UTC, first time I see ALSX trans getting to 1.2. After that, pretty consistently at that level. So, probably not related to this week's troubles?
The first lock this morning that was using guardian automatically lost lock during the state Transition_from_etmx, but the lockloss was about 21.5 sec after the swap away from ETMX. So, I thought we should be able to do the swap and sit there, if the locklosses were due to something else like the ETMX bias ramping, or something (not that I know why that should cause a lockloss).
Ibrahim was able to stop and wait for 10+ mins at LOWNOISE_ASC. We ran LOWNOISE_COIL_DRIVERS with guardian, then in the guardian shell did all the prep stuff in Transition_from_etmx, then as a block did lines 5086-5089 to actually do the swap. Lost lock during the 5 sec ramp swapping away from ETMX, so this didn't work.
Checking some ETMY filters (since Sheila et al checked ETMX yesterday). Looks like h1susetmy foton file was last loaded in April 2023 (according to the date of the last _install.txt file in the filter archive), so before O4 began, so really there should be no possiblitiy of changes there, and indeed I don't find any changes.
* ETMY L2 Lock only filter used is FM7 "Qprime", has not changed shape in a long time (just picked a few older foton files out of the filter_archive).
* ETMY L1 Lock only filter used is FM10 "UIMcomp", also not changed in a long time.
* ETMY L3 lock filters FM5, FM8, FM9, FM10. But these are all flat to pretty high freq, before they are notches / stopbands, so no effect really on our low freq stability issues. Also, no changes.
h1susitmx foton also last loaded April 2023, before O4, so shouldn't be any changes there.
Lockloss around 1388535878 (6 Jan 00:24:20 UTC) was about 2 mins after the swap to ETMY and ITMX.
Lockloss around 1388533427 (5 Jan 23:43:29 UTC) was only about 10 sec after the swap.
Seems like we're just quite delicate and susceptible to wind + microseism after this swap?
In case we were running into lack of control authority due to being in the lownoise coil driver state, we tried (without much hope, but trying anyway) to skip lownoise_coil_drivers and go straight from lownoise_asc to transition_from_etmx. We lasted a little more than 5 sec past the swap, but not much more than that, so this isn't an avenue toward different diagnosis path.
The wind is supposed to start getting better after 4pm today, so I wonder if the best path forward is to just wait out the environment? I wonder if (as Ibrahim has said) this level of microseism plus wind is just untenable for us to reacquire lock with.
Sat Jan 06 10:08:28 2024 INFO: Fill completed in 8min 22secs
Lockloss at TRANSITION_FROM_ETMX. Despite microseism and wind, the lock acquisition was smooth until this point.
The last 8 Locklosses have been from this state.
Lockloss 19:18 UTC
Lost lock at the same state but this time:
I posted my notes so far in alog 75215.
Lockloss 20:13 UTC
Lost lock at the same state while attempting a workaround to the issue (alog 75215)
TITLE: 01/06 Day Shift: 16:00-00:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Microseism
OUTGOING OPERATOR: None (Cancelled OWL)
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
SEI_ENV state: CALM
Wind: 25mph Gusts, 18mph 5min avg
Primary useism: 0.09 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.77 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
IFO is down due to high microseism - will attempt to lock (but will go back to down if there's no chance)
MX Temperature is showing a red alert on the alarm handler - will investigate
FOM nuc24's image capture code which posts the display images to the CDS web page had incorrectly switched over to 4k monitor mode a few days ago. I rebooted nuc24 at 10:10 PST and all is looking good now.
TITLE: 01/06 Eve Shift: 00:00-08:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Microseism/Wind
SHIFT SUMMARY: Challenging evening fighting excess ground motion from wind/microseism and consistent locklosses after reaching full power during lock acquisition.
H1 is currently DOWN until environmental conditions improve and/or further investigation into the instability seen after powering up.