Displaying reports 141-160 of 77235.Go to page Start 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 End
Reports until 08:47, Thursday 01 August 2024
LHO VE (VE)
gerardo.moreno@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:47, Thursday 01 August 2024 - last comment - 17:53, Thursday 01 August 2024(79396)
Corner Station Dew Point Measurement

Dew point measurement taken this morning read at -43.6 oC.  Measurement taken before any activity inside chambers.  Soft covers were on HAM5 and HAM6, HAM7 is isolated.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
gerardo.moreno@LIGO.ORG - 17:53, Thursday 01 August 2024 (79426)VE

End of the day dew point measurement, at -43.5 oC. 

Images attached to this comment
H1 SYS
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:47, Thursday 01 August 2024 - last comment - 16:33, Monday 05 August 2024(79397)
fast shutter slow motion video

A slow motion video of the fast shutter, firing with the high voltage driver in air, is here:  slow motion video

Comments related to this report
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - 16:33, Monday 05 August 2024 (79460)

Sheila's original video is ~2sec footage of fast shutter, supposedly at 150 fps according to the file metadata.

Attached is an edited video that shows the 50ms of FS action slowed down by a factor of 10. "SRC TC" is the time elapsed since the start of (Sheila's original) video multiplied by a factor of 10, i.e. 1 sec in SRC TC is actually 100ms. This timestamp is not to be trusted at the lowest digit of sub-second (ms level in reality) because there's some frame interpolation going on due to mismatch between the standard output frame rate of 24FPS VS the source frame rate (150 slowed down to 15 FPS). Anyway, the mirror goes down lower than the closed position right after the initial thrust of the HV fast shutter motion, and even a few bounces after that, before the shutter eventually settles to the permanently closed position.

Also attached is an annotated png file of four frames ("Open", "HV thrust", "Bounce to the bottom" and "Close").

Images attached to this comment
Non-image files attached to this comment
LHO VE
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:10, Thursday 01 August 2024 (79395)
Thu CP1 Fill

Thu Aug 01 08:07:40 2024 INFO: Fill completed in 7min 36secs

 

Images attached to this report
H1 General
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:35, Thursday 01 August 2024 - last comment - 09:41, Thursday 01 August 2024(79394)
Ops Day Shift Start

TITLE: 08/01 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Corrective Maintenance
OUTGOING OPERATOR: None
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: MAINTENANCE
    Wind: 1mph Gusts, 0mph 5min avg
    Primary useism: 0.01 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.05 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:

Today we'll be closing upu HAM6!

Comments related to this report
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - 09:41, Thursday 01 August 2024 (79398)

Dust monitor 6 needs a restart, dm5 is reporting low battery on the medm which I haven't seen before. I also thought I left dm5 off as it was a noisy pumped dm, I'll take a quick look.

H1 SEI
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:30, Wednesday 31 July 2024 (79393)
HAM6 ISI tfs look good, SEI ready for chamber closeout

After transition to laser safe, I unlocked HAM6 ISI, did a small balance adjustment and ran some close out tfs. TFs look okay. I think SEI is ready for doors to go on.

Images attached to this report
H1 General
anthony.sanchez@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:58, Wednesday 31 July 2024 (79391)
Wednesday Ops Shift End

TITLE: 07/31 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Corrective Maintenance
SHIFT SUMMARY:
I know that there have been a lot of Laser trasitions done today...
But

The LVEA IS  currently in LASER SAFE.

OFI work has continued all day :

  1. ✅Measure Isolation - new simpler plan suggestion from LLO (cube between SRM and OFI…)  Backup - Need Aux laser in HAM6 as LLO#58791, 58848
    1. If out of spec, adjust TGG crystal location (slots in mount)
  2. ✅ Inspect/deal with beam dumps if not done already
  3. ✅Squeeze beam alignment Check, AS and WFS
  4. ✅Check OFI rejected PD path alog59906 KPT fwd rejected (use WP before OFI)

 

Before closeout 

  1. ✅ Robert in-chamber pictures
  2. ✅Finish testing Fast Shutter, trigger HV
  3. See HAM6 closeout checklist
  4. ✅ Correct OFI osem magnet(s)
  5. ✅ Rebalance  OFI
  6. Reinstall OFI Glass shroud
  7. ✅ Re Check AS and WFS (Not checking WFS)
  8. ✅ Turn on laser for final alignment check 
  9. ✅ Remove all retro reflector, iris and AUX laser parts
  10. Unlock ISI ( Jim is unlocking HAM5 but not HAM6)




LOG:

Start Time System Name Location Lazer_Haz Task Time End
17:22 SAF Laser HAZARD LVEA YES LVEA is Laser HAZARD 20:01
14:32 FAC Eric FTCE No Working on Air Handler 14:52
15:03 FAC Kim & Karen LVEA LASER Hazard Technical Cleaning Kim out first 15:53
15:16 VAC Gerardo LVEA yes Dew Point measurements. 15:26
15:29 OFI Sheila & Betsy LVEA Yes Isolation ratio measurements, Betsy out first 19:30
15:49 PCAL Francisco PCAL Lab Yes PCAL PS45 measurement 16:49
15:55 OFI Camilla, Keita Optics lab & LVEA Yes Getting parts and helping the HAM5,6 crew 19:16
16:10 PEM Robert,  Milly, Carlos End X N Testing PEM equipment 20:01
16:18 FAC Karen Mid Y N Dropping off supplies/ technical cleaning. 17:04
17:04 EE Fil & Richard LVEA Yes Checking on HAM5 17:04
17:47 VAC Gerardo Relay tube Yes Relay tube valve open 17:48
18:52 EPO Amber +10 Ctrl Rm & Overpass n Tour 18:52
19:29 SAF Oli & Ibrihim LVEA Yes LASER Transition to safe. 19:54
20:01 OFI Rahul & Betsy LVEA No SUS OFI work,  Rahul out first 00:19
20:23 VAC Gerardo LVEA No Isolating HAM7 21:03
20:28 Staff Tour Jenne + 15 LVEA No Checking out the HAM5 & 6 Chamber. 21:12
21:29 PCAL Francisco PCAL Lab yes Checking Config 21:39
21:59 SAFE Sheila LVEA Yes LASER HAZARD Transition 22:26
22:06 OFI Camilla LVEA Yes Working on OFI with Sheila 23:45
22:49 SAFE Ryan C. LVEA Yes Laser  Transition 23:19
23:19 VAC Janos HAM8 N Checking Vacuum system 23:59
23:36 SEI Jim HAM5 N Seismic system checks 01:36
23:44 SAF LAZER SAFE LVEA YES THE LVEA IS LASER SAFE :) 22:24
23:48 OFI Richard LVEA N Checking on the Status of OFI crew 00:48

 

H1 General (Laser Safety, Laser Transition)
anthony.sanchez@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:16, Wednesday 31 July 2024 (79389)
LVEA LASER SAFE Transition

Ryan Crouch has Transitioned the LVEA to LASER SAFE.

Work Permit 12014

H1 SUS (SUS)
rahul.kumar@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:48, Wednesday 31 July 2024 - last comment - 16:15, Wednesday 31 July 2024(79387)
HAM5 OFI transfer function measurements taken after SD_AOSEM and magnet re-attached

Betsy, Rahul

This afternoon, Betsy adjusted the SD magnet on the OFI and we confirmed that it is sitting correctly in it's place. Next, she inserted the AOSEM and centered it on the magnet (polarity was already checked). We also took this opportunity to take the OLC/offsets/gain for the SD aosem, which is given below,

OLC = 17000, offsets = -8500, Gain = 1.739 (30,000/OLC). This has accepted in the SDF.

The in-air transfer function measurement results are attached below (we took only 3 averages) and they look healthy for all three dof - template at /ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/OFIS/H1/OFI/SAGM1/Data

We then started attaching the OFI shroud as per D11800103 - the top two, side (+X side) and front shroud has been attached. Mitchell joined us to help with attaching the top and one of the shrouds. There are two/three more panels left to be attached, which will be done once Sheila is done with the beam alignment check.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
rahul.kumar@LIGO.ORG - 16:15, Wednesday 31 July 2024 (79388)

I also took out an iris (and post holder) which was sitting in front of the OFI on the ISI table.

H1 General (Laser Safety)
anthony.sanchez@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:08, Wednesday 31 July 2024 (79386)
LVEA LASER HAZARD Transition

Sheila has Transitioned the LVEA to LASER Hazard.

Work Permit 12013

H1 ISC (SQZ)
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:59, Wednesday 31 July 2024 - last comment - 16:20, Wednesday 31 July 2024(79379)
OFI Isolation Ratio Measurement

Sheila, Betsy, Keita, Camilla. Continuing from 79373. Measured in 2021 in the lab in 59410.

Betsy and Sheila set up of the power meter in location B of 79373 with the wave-plate rotated such that the beam is visible. Distance between OM1 and retro-mirror is ~350mm, before the fast shutter.

The retro-refection wasn't perfect. Betsy and Sheila found that the HAM5 iris centered on the forward aux laser isn't well centered on the beam retro-reflected from the mirror in HAM6. This made it hard to block the ghost beam (direct reflection, no change in polarization) without also blocking the retro-beam that we want to measure. There is also a bright rejected beam headed to ZM6 which is only there as the waveplate is changing polarization is making some of the beam rejected by the TFP.  They touched the retro mirror to improve it.

They alternated power measurements from position B (the beam that should be isolated by the OFI) and then position A (to measure the power from the laser). Used 10 seconds of statistics mode data for each with the Thorlabs power meter.

Starting measurements at 10:01 PT:

Similar measurements by LLO in 58791 and 2021 from LHO in lab 59410.

Isolation = 10*log10((( 2*Position B)/ Position A)
Isolation = 10*log10 (2*0.2uW  / 7.7mW)
With all the data, using the attached .py file  the three measurements are: [-42.44 -42.62 -43.02]
The mean isolation measured is: -42.69dB This is well within our requirements of -36dB
The temperature control was off, the temperature was 21.6degC plot, nominally while observing we hold this at 25degC. This 3.5degC change corresponds to 1.5kOhm (a 1.1kOhm change at LLO corresponds to a 1dB change LLO58831) so would still be way within our isolation requirements.

AS_C sees this beam, measuring 360uW. It is not centered, -0.4 in Pit and -0.4 Yaw, see attached. When we set up the aux laser it was also off in this direction (-0.6, -0.6) 79300: similar enough.

Betsy and Shieal added a waveplate before the OFI in the AUX path and checked that the forward KTP rejected beam to OFI_B was seen, attached.

In parallel, we turned on the SQZ laser and checked that the SQZ dither lock was stable (0.94mW on OPO_IR_PD) with 75mW of SEED injected. Keita and I opened SQZT7 and adjusted ZM4 and ZM5 to be better centered on the irises. We still didn't have much beam on AS_C but after I further adjusted ZM4 (sdf's not saved), we could see it, see attached.

Betsy is working on replacing the osem magnet I knocked from it's correct position in 79316.

Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - 14:56, Wednesday 31 July 2024 (79385)

Daniel, Sheila, Camilla. We checked that when we turned the OFI TEC control off (before venting) the "room temp" of the chamber is 21.1 deg. WE might not be able to get this low with the TEC on but will plan to run the OFI TEC closer to 22deg than 25deg once back up.

Images attached to this comment
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - 16:20, Wednesday 31 July 2024 (79390)

Retro reflected beam should have been ~80% of the size of the IFO beam in the OFI. 

According to Sheila the retro mirror was placed ~35cm downstream of OM1 (between OM1 and OM2). Using this number and the measured beam size of the AUX laser in the lab, the beam width of the AUX beam forward (green) and back (blue) propagating beam are plotted in the attached together with the IFO beam size. In this plot, x axis would be zero at OM1.

As a visual aid, I drew the central 18" part of the OFI cage in the HAM5 drawing. On the plot, again as a visual, aid, this 18" range is drawn as two vertical lines. All optical components of OFI should be in this 18" range, FYI they are all mounted on a single 16"-long metal plate (D2000043) though I don't know the position of that plate relative to the cage.

Images attached to this comment
LHO VE (VE)
gerardo.moreno@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:01, Wednesday 31 July 2024 - last comment - 17:13, Wednesday 31 July 2024(79378)
Corner Station Dew Point Measurement

Dew point measurement taken this morning read at -43.9 oC.  Measurement taken before any activity inside chambers.  Soft covers were on HAM5 and HAM6, HAM7 is isolated and a bit pressurized.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
travis.sadecki@LIGO.ORG - 17:13, Wednesday 31 July 2024 (79392)

End of the day dew point measurement, at -43.0 oC. 

Images attached to this comment
H1 ISC
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:42, Friday 26 July 2024 - last comment - 10:19, Thursday 01 August 2024(79326)
KTP wedge chipped, back up spare installed and ready to go to chamber

Keita, Sheila

Summary:  We chipped the spare KTP crystal this morning, and this afternoon installed the back up spare that Rodica had shipped.  We've adjusted the roll, and the pitch angle seems better than the crystal that we removed.  So this should be ready to go into the chamber first thing Monday morning.  We have many photos from today, which will be attached and annotated to this alog later. 

Following on From Jason's alog 79319

With this placement of the damaged KTP in it's assembly, where the assembly is bolted perpendictular to the beam path, and a wave plate to mix the polarizatoins upstream of the KTP,  we have 13.5mW in the p polarized beam (see first attachment which is a diagram Paul sent us this morning), 16.3mW in the s polarized beam, and 2.3 mW in the AR surface.  This is not set up with the AOI that the AR coating is designed for, which is why the AR beam is large, we can take advantage of this to set the pitch by setting the AR reflection parallel to the table.. 

With the original KTP in place, the AR reflection isn't parallel to the table it is pitched up by 10/(530 +405 mm) about 11 mrad. The optic lab beam is hitting the KTP a little below the burned spot, which would have been on the +X side in chamber.  The burned spots are on the side closer to our alignment laser.

Before taking it out of the mount we took a variety of photos showing the damage spots position.  We did not find any indium foil in the mount, Paul had warned us that there might be indium between part 5 and part 9 of D2000038

As we were placing the new crystal in the mount, we left the set screws (11) that hold the peek loose, and held the piece upsidedown while we screwed in the bolts labeled #10 to hold on the aliuminum plate.  It chipped as we were tightening the bolts labeled 10 in D2000038. After some discussion with Rodica, Paul, Gabriele, we went back to the lab to take photos of the chip and try to understand how the chip happened.  We have photos showing that the crystal was proud of the top of part 5, the orientation of the black metal piece.  After we removed the black front plate, we could see that the KTP was firmly stuck in part #5, with the wedge stuck.  Keita had to push on the back of the crystal to get it loose. 

Keita made a series of measurements using calibers:

Chipped KTP: (agrees well with the drawing: E1900284)

part 5: https://dcc.ligo.org/DocDB/0171/D2000567/001/D2000567_A%2B_OFI_KTP_Wedge_Holder.pdf

peek:

total height (max): crystal + peek = 0.885+0.1105 = 0.9955 inches, smaller than 0.2mm than the height of the slot.

cratered KTP:

We then did a trial run (using the chipped KTP) of an approach that we think avoids the problem of letting the KTP get wedged in the holder.  We set the KTP on several wipes on the bench, and set the peek underneath it.  We then slid the holder (part #5) over this whole thing, which went smoothly, and tightened the set screws.  After flipping it over, we can see that the KTP is not proud of part #5, and it sits nearly flush to the front of the holder.  We could then easily attach the black front plate.  We decided to do this with the final spare, which had 2 small chips on the edge. 

With that spare installed in the assembly, we adjusted roll using the alignment laser that Camilla and Jason set up.  We wanted to adjust roll so that the transmitted beams were level to the table, since we know that the laser bea we started with were parallel to the table.  The roll adjustment was sticky, and tightneing the set screw tended to lower the transmitted beams.  The beams transmitted are off in yaw compared to the ones from the cratered KTP, by about 7mm/870mm + about 8 mrad.  We had difficulty seeing the AR reflected beam, but we can see a tiny beam with all the lights off (this suggest that the reason the beam was so bright before was the coating damage, not the AOI of the crystal in our set up.). At 820 mm from the KTP, the AR beam was about 1 mm too low, so it's pitched down by 1mrad. 

We think this is about as good as we can do by adjusting with this mount, so we are satisfied and will leave the KTP assembly under wipes and foil to be reinstalled on Monday.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 21:25, Friday 26 July 2024 (79331)

Photos showing the location of the crater damage spots, and how the crystal was mounted in the holder as found.

Images attached to this comment
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 21:32, Friday 26 July 2024 (79332)

Photos showing the chipped crystal.  The second photo shows some small chips on the back edge, we noticed these just before the crystal chipped.  Rodica says those look similar to things she has seen in these crystals, so this might be something that was present before today.  The front of the crystal has a large chip and damage along the bottom, those both happened while tightening the bolt on the front plate.

Images attached to this comment
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 21:48, Friday 26 July 2024 (79333)

Photos of how the damage probably happened.  The crystal was proud of the aluminum holder, visible between the aluminum and the black piece in the first photo.  The next two photos show that there was space between the back of the holder and the thick part of the wedge on both the top and the bottom.

The last 4 photos are side on views from 4 sides showing how crystal was sticking out in front of aluminum holder.

The MTP was lodged tightly in the aluminum holder and wasn't easily dislodged, the last photo shows how Keita slid the peek out from under it and the crystal was still stuck tight. 

Images attached to this comment
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 21:51, Friday 26 July 2024 (79335)

When we took the cratered KTP out to measure it, a speck of black seems to have fallen out of one of the craters. 
final photos for today show how the beam out of the new crystal was off in yaw compared the the crater damaged crystal.  The irises were placed on the transmitted beams through the crater damaged crystal by Jason before we swapped.  

Images attached to this comment
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - 12:29, Monday 29 July 2024 (79347)

Video of the installation of new KTP in the KTP holder (without breaking it) was uploaded to https://dcc.ligo.org/G2401494 as it is too big to attach to alog.

Note that the table surface (and therefore the face of the holder facing the table in the video) is NOT perpendicular to the cylindrical surface of the holder. Attached is a cartoon of the side view of the installation shown in the video. (86 deg in the cartoon is just an eyeballing, but it should be larger than 80 deg, smaller than 90).

The problem seems to be that the height (which you cannot see in the cartoon) of the KTP as well as PEEK cushon (which you cannot see in the cartoon either) combined is so close to the height of the slot in the holder that a slight rotation of KTP relative to the holder around x axis will easily wedge the KTP in place.

Images attached to this comment
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - 14:55, Monday 29 July 2024 (79353)

For posterity, below is a table of KTP wedge serial number.

S/N Description ICS
3005 The original wedge with laser damages (aka cratored one). TBD
3004 The first replacement that we chipped. https://ics.ligo-la.caltech.edu/JIRA/browse/E1900284-2-Aplus-3004
3001 Pristine one that we installed in HAM6. TBD

S/N 3004 and 3005 will be sent to GariLynn.

betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - 12:04, Tuesday 30 July 2024 (79366)

Another great pic of the laser damaged KTP.

Images attached to this comment
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - 09:12, Wednesday 31 July 2024 (79380)

Table of KTP wedge serial number with newly made ISC links for SN3005 and 3001. Thanks Mitch for making these records!

S/N Description ICS
3005 The original wedge with laser damages (aka cratored one). https://ics.ligo-la.caltech.edu/JIRA/browse/E1900284-2-Aplus-3005
3004 The first replacement that we chipped. https://ics.ligo-la.caltech.edu/JIRA/browse/E1900284-2-Aplus-3004
3001 Pristine one that we installed in HAM6. https://ics.ligo-la.caltech.edu/JIRA/browse/E1900284-2-Aplus-3001

 

corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 10:19, Thursday 01 August 2024 (79405)EPO

Tagging for EPO.

H1 ISC (SUS, SYS)
jason.oberling@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:13, Thursday 25 July 2024 - last comment - 10:19, Thursday 01 August 2024(79319)
KTP Wedge Assembly Prepped for Swap and Realignment

C. Compton, S. Dwyer, J. Oberling

This afternoon we prepared the KTP wedge assembly for swap and realignment.  Camilla had already mostly prepped a beam path for this using the beam reflected from the PBS cube in front of the Prometheus laser, but there was some oddness with the beam so Sheila and I moved one of the mirrors so we could use the beam transmitted by the PBS cube.  There was still oddness with the beam when at low power (looked like it had a bit of a halo around it), but it went away at a slightly higher power (a couple mW vs just under 1 mW).  Moving on, we aligned the beam along a row of holes and then installed the KTP wedge assembly (after Sheila wiped the area down several times with IPA wipes).  We had removed the beam dump assembly before placing the KTP wedge in the beam path, and the bolts were very tight.  It looked like the black coating on the assembly was also in the threaded bolt holes; this coating had been rubbed off by the bolts during assembly, and it looked like this was the cause of the difficulty in removing the beam dump assembly (there was coating visiblt deep in the threads but none on the outside where the bolt fully contacts the threads).  A HWP was placed in the beam so we could adjust the power in the beams transmitted by the KTP wedge.

With the KTP wedge assembly in place we found the two transmitted beams and set irises in the near and far field, 2 irises for each beam.  We also found the beam reflected from the front surface of the KTP wedge and placed an iris in this beam as well.  I placed beam dumps to block the beams so there are not unblocked beams when the laser gets turned on.  To preserve the cleanliness of the KTP wedge assembly I placed several layers of dry wipes over the assembly and then covered it with foil; I then wiped the area down again with IPA wipes.  The KTP wedge assembly is now ready for the damaged KTP wedge to be swapped with a spare and realigned; Keita and Sheila plan on starting the swap and realignment tomorrow.

I've attached several pictures of the setup and they are, in order:

  1. The 2 near field irises behind the KTP wedge (with beam dump between KTP wedge and the irises)
  2. The near and far field irises
  3. The reflected beam iris and its beam dump
  4. Another picture of the KTP wedge assembly
  5. Foil covering over KTP wedge assembly (with several layers of dry wipes between the foil and the KTP wedge assembly)

NOTE: There is now a Class A assembly in the Optics Lab.  Please observe ALL posted contamination control signs when entering the Optics Lab, and DO NOT enter the far cleanroom (with the Prometheus laser on it) unless you are working on the KTP wedge assembly swap.  This assembly is going back into the vacuum envelope, so we have to do our absolute best to preserve its cleanliness.  Thank you.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 10:19, Thursday 01 August 2024 (79404)EPO

Tagging for EPO.

H1 ISC (SUS, SYS)
jason.oberling@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:14, Thursday 25 July 2024 - last comment - 10:19, Thursday 01 August 2024(79315)
KTP Wedge Assembly Removed from OFI

C. Compton, S. Dwyer, J. Oberling

This morning we removed the KTP wedge assembly (D2000038) from the OFI and moved it into the OSB Optics Lab.

We began by trying the "transport shims" that are supposed to help secure the OFI.  Unfortunately, these did not work.  The slot in the shims was not wide enough to fit around the OFI Earthquake Stop Posts we were supposed to fit them around, and the shims were too skinny (the posts bottomed out before contacting the shims).  So we had to pivot to Plan B, which was to use dog clamps instead.  This mostly worked, but the OFI still moved around enough that we decided one of us would try to support the OFI while the other turned bolts.  Camilla has some pictures of this and will post as a comment to this alog.  Even still, we managed to almost immediately dislodge one of the OSEM magnets (the one near the lone +X/+Y OSEM) as soon as we started trying to remove the KTP wedge assembly (the magnet is still stuck to the flag on the OFI, will need to have its polarity checked and be put back in place).

We first placed a teflon sheet in between the KTP wedge and the quartz rotator assembly.  Using non-magnetic tools (a titanium hex key that had been bent so it would fit in the space between the KTP and FS wedges, and a beryllium copper one that had been cut short) we attempted to remove the beam dump assembly from the KTP wedge assembly.  Camilla held the OFI and I tried to loosen the bolts holding the beam dump on the KTP wedge.  I say "tried" because the bolts are frozen in place.  We were unable to get them to move, at all.  Pivoting again, we found that the beryllium copper hex key was short enough to fit under the beam dump assembly, so we began loosening the two bolts on the +Y side of the KTP wedge assembly; Camilla had to crawl in the -X door to access the -X bolt while I held the OFI.  This worked until the -X bolt was loose enough that we could no longer fit the hex key under the beam dump assembly.  At this point Sheila used a T-shaped titanium hex key to loosen the -Y bolt on the KTP wedge (the bolt directly under the quartz rotator) while I held the OFI, and then I loosened the +X bolt.  With these 2 bolts loose we were able to lift the KTP wedge assembly enough that Camilla could fit the hex key under the beam dump assembly again.  In this way were able to slowly work the -X bolt free.  With all bolts free I carefully removed the KTP wedge assembly while Sheila held the OFI.  We Ooohh'd and Ahhhh'd at the craters in the KTP wedge for a bit and took some photos (see attached), and Camilla and Sheila grabbed some more pictures of the back side of the FS wedge (more access, and therefore better viewing, with the KTP assembly out of the way).  We also removed the teflon sheet from in front of the quartz rotator.

We ensured all of the non-magnetic tools were separate from other tools in the cleanroom, safely wrapped up the tools we would need as well as the KTP wedge assembly, and moved everything to the optics lab to start prepping for swapping and realigning the KTP wedge assembly (the beam dump assembly will have to be removed in the Optics Lab).  I've attached a few closeup pictures of the KTP; 2 are viewing the front surface and one is viewing the back surface (better view of the coating damage around the craters).  Camilla has several other pictures that she'll attach as a comment to this alog.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - 16:02, Thursday 25 July 2024 (79316)

Note on the  D1300098 OFI Transport shims, looking at 3.1.2 and 4.2.1 of E1300056-v4, it appears we were trying to use them incorrectly and should replace the Earthquake Stop Posts with 1/4-20 bolts. We could try this next week but it would involve removing another shroud panel to get clearance... 

The first three photos attached show the OFI with the KTP removed, and looking through the FS towards the magnets. Third one shows splatter on FS.

Forth/fifth photos show the dog clamps we used to help support the sled and the osem magnet that got turned over: photo

Images attached to this comment
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 10:19, Thursday 01 August 2024 (79403)EPO

Tagging for EPO.

H1 ISC
francisco.llamas@LIGO.ORG - posted 22:17, Wednesday 24 July 2024 - last comment - 10:18, Thursday 01 August 2024(79300)
HAM 5 laser alignment day 3

Camilla, Jason, Jenne, Keita, Sheila, Francisco, Naoki

Summary: We are done for AUX laser alignment and power measurement of AUX laser. SQZ beam got to OM1, but we did not do power measurement due to noisy seed dither lock. The following are a mixture of notes between Camilla, Francisco, and Naoki regarding the changes done today:

Aiming for 2 1/4" above EQ stop as 4" between vertical stops and the center of SR2 optic is 5.5mm above center line of EQ stops.

At start of the day, someting had drifted (mainly pitch), re-centered AUX laser on irises.

*Iterating moving auxiliary laser mirror and beamspiltter to center in om1 and retroreflection irises.*

Checking position at SR2:

Swapped the AUX laser steeing mirror to a better optic mount and not woberly perdistal, we are blaming this for our drift.

Jenne also adjusted SRM sliders to yesterdays values.

*Iterating moving auxiliary laser mirror and beamspiltter to center in om1 and retroreflection irises.*

Checking position at SR2:

Moved SRM osems from (175, 140) to (50,190). In pitch moved -125urad from 175 to 50 on osems. In yaw moved +50urad. this was 140 to 190 on osems
Aiming to center the beam on SR2


*Iterating moving auxiliary moving mirror to center in om1 and retroreflection irises.*

Checking position at SR2:

EQ stops are 2 1/2 in away from each other; center is 1 1/4 in from horizontal EQ stop

Will do 100 microrad in -YAW, then check retro in OM1. -100urad in yaw is 190 to 90 on osems

*Iterating moving auxiliary moving mirror to center in om1 and retroreflection irises.*

Checking positions at SR2:

In yaw going +300 urad. This is 90 to 390 on osems.

*Iterating moving auxiliary moving mirror to center in om1 and retroreflection irises.*

Checking positions at SR2:

*LUNCH BREAK*
 


Sheila back to SR2;

earlier today SRM P moved from 179 to 50. 1 1/4 inch move on SR2

Moved 1/4 inch backward. moved SRM P from 50 to 76

Sheila is happy with SR2 centering.

Jason is setting iris on OM1. Beam on OM1 ugly? due to crater on OFI?

ASC_AS_C P -0.6 Y -0.6

open GV for HAM7. send SQZ beam. seed dither lock is very noisy.

SQZ beam is close to AUX laser?

AUX power measurement

Comments related to this report
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - 13:49, Thursday 25 July 2024 (79313)

First three attached photos are of the aux laser steering mirror we swapped in, original mirror in 79253.

Fourth photo is the iris we places between the aux laser beamsplitter and SRM. Once we were finished with the alignment Jenne and Sheila recentered this iris on the beam. 

The power measurements recorded are with the AUX laser as we had trouble dither locking the SQZ seed beam. More details:

  • 1.72mW before SRM (SR2 side)
  • 0.605mW just after SRM (Good, expect 0.602mW =  35% transmitted = 0.35 x 1.72mW)
  • 0.45mW after KTP and TGG before TFP (expect 100% throughput so are loosing 25% through OFI)
  • 0.380mW before OM1 (some power lost through wring polarization to OFI rejected path? Didn't confirm).
Fifth image is the SQZ beam after passing through the OFI and SRM. Can see a big whole in the middle of the beam!! We expect this is from passing through the KTP crater! Still not easy to tell which crater the beam is passing though.
Note that the aux laser beam is too small to tell by eye if there is a hole in it, but once we got the alignment better, the beam quality seemed to decrease and the beam become dimmer.

Sixth image is the SQZ beam and aux laser beam (smaller) after SRM. They are misaligned in yaw. 

Seventh image is te  SQZ beam and aux laser beam (below) before OM1. They are misaligned in pitch.

Images attached to this comment
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 10:18, Thursday 01 August 2024 (79402)EPO

Tagging for EPO.

H1 ISC
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 22:03, Tuesday 23 July 2024 - last comment - 10:18, Thursday 01 August 2024(79291)
HAM 5 alignment laser day 2

Sheila, Jason, Jennie, Keita, Jenne, Camilla, Naoki. Following 79274.'

Summary:  We still need more work on the alignment laser tomorow.  Today we believe that we understood the right process for setting it up, but we will need to iterate a few more times to get it set.

  • This morning when we went to the chamber we saw the reflection from one of the ITMs coming back near SRM, we were confused by this for a minute and misaligned the ITMs. 
  • Jennie found we needed to move SRM Yaw to 136 on the osems 79272, we did this (could see the beam slightly move but barely) and then touched the AUX laser BS to center the retrofection on the iris right after the laser.
  • Beam was on AS_C (170uW vs 100uW blocked) but not centered (-0.3 pit; +0.2 yaw)
  • Jennie found we were off 10urad in Pitch and moved SRM to 659.9 uradians on osems. This was not visible on the iris but we again touched the AUX laser BS to center the retrofection on the iris right after the laser (wasn't centered this morning <1mm off but was centered last night).
  • Sheila entered the chamber and walked to SR2, the beam was well centered in yaw but somewhat less than an inch too low.  Jenne moved SRM by about 350urad in pitch to bring the beam closer to center.
  • Jenne put SRM back half way to the starting place (so that we were half way between the alignment that gave us a good centering on SR2, and the one that we think should be close to what we had in lock.  Then Jason, Jenne, and Keita walked the temporary steering mirror and beamsplitter.  They moved the beam splitter to bring the beam lower on OM1, since they noticed that it was slightly high of center, and then walked the mirrors to restore the retroreflection on the iris right after the collimator. 
  • The combination of these moves meant that the beam was very low on SR2, clipping on the scrapper baffle and hitting the optic right at the bottom, around the level of the earthquake stops.
  • We took a lunch break, and installed an iris in front of OM1 to mark that position, and set SRM back to the alignment that we think that we were using for locking.  Jenne Jason and Naoki tried to move the beam the restore the retroreflection while keeping the beam on the OM1 iris, they found that in order to do that they had to move the beam visibly low on the Faraday aperture, on the temporary beam splitter (which Betsy set to 8.3", the SRM center height.).  We then realized that this might be because the beam has been high of center on OM1 while we have been locking, consistent with the fast shutter bouncing. 
  • We decided to move the beam closer to center in the OFI aperture, and the temporary beamsplitter, and allow it to be above center on OM1.  After this Jenne, Naoki and Jason realigned so that the beam was retroreflected with SRM aligned as we think it was for locking.  I went into the chamber again to look at the beam position, and found it was between 2 and 3 inches to low (a bit more than the height of the thorlabs beam card), and about 1 cm off in the -X direction.
  • When I left, the team was planning to reset the iris by OM1, and possibly make a move of SRM and walk the temporary mirror + BS to restore the retro reflection and spot position on OM1 iris.  If this worked we will check in the morning where the beam is on SR2. 

 

Comments related to this report
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - 23:10, Tuesday 23 July 2024 (79292)

It's useful to know the geometry of this setup.

The SRM is a convex mirroor with R=5.678m ROC (and therefore a converging flat-convex lens with f=12.6m focal length).

All rays retro-reflected by the SRM HR surface converge at a single point. Because of the lensing effect of SRM, this point is NOT the center of the ROC but away from SRM by Rf/(R+f)=3.92m. OM1 is 3.65m away from SRM. These are all you need to know (plus a basic knowledge of thin lens), but I drew a cartoon for you (1st attached, top, but you can also see 2nd attachment for the math) where four different rays, all retro-reflected by SRM, are converging at one point.

Now, Sheila's 3rd bullet point from the bottom is like the green line in the cartoon. The green dot at the OM1 position marks the center of the OM1, however there's only one ray that is retroreflected and goes through the center of OM1 (green line), which happens to be VERY low on SRM.

Without touching SRM, we can walk the beam on SRM while keeping the retroreflection and bring up the position at SRM by deltax, and as a result the beam position goes up about 0.07*deltax at OM1 and about 3.7*deltax on SR2.

Note that a small pit offset on OM1 has a big effect on SRM and SR2, i.e. 1mm on OM1 will become 14mm at SRM and 54mm at SR2.

Images attached to this comment
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - 23:41, Tuesday 23 July 2024 (79293)

SR2 beam position when Sheila left was 1cm to +X, too low by 3"~76mm (i.e. the beam needed to move to -X by 1cm, up by 3"~76mm).

Now the task is to rotate the SRM, maintain the retroreflection while keeping the beam position on OM1. This is explained in the attached cartoon again. Anyway, conclusion is that if we want to move the beam up by deltay at SR2, we have to rotate SRM by deltay/215m, i.e. deltay/[SRM rotation] ~ 2mm/10urad.

(The calculation in the attached assumes that we're fixing the OM1 beam position, but in reality the iris is maybe 50cm or so closer to SRM, so L=3.15 instead of 3.65. This should have a large effect on one of the important numbers d-L=3.92m-L, it changes from 0.27 to 0.77. Mostly because of this, my calculation is severely overestimating the deltay/[SRM rotaion] maybe by a factor of 3, roughly.)

Anyway,we used 2mm/10urad number at the time, and moved SRM in PIT by negative 380urad (PIT slider 2121 -> 1741, YAW slider -3492 no change).

At this point we reset the position of the iris to the beam. Naoki, Jason and Jenne adjusted the steering mirror and the BS so the beam hits the center of the iris while keeping the retroreflection. We stopped the work there.

Images attached to this comment
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - 06:32, Wednesday 24 July 2024 (79295)

This is a picture of Sheila entering HAM4-HAM5 tube through the eye-shaped baffle.

Images attached to this comment
jason.oberling@LIGO.ORG - 06:31, Wednesday 24 July 2024 (79296)

Should also add that when restoring the aux laser alignment to OM1 position and the retroreflection iris in the afternoon, the alignment converged much quicker when using the beamsplitter to align the retroreflection and the steering mirror to align OM1 position.  In the morning we were doing the opposite (beamsplitter to OM1, steering mirror to retroreflection), and while we were able to get the alignment to converge it was picky and had a tendency to diverge if we made large steps.

After working through the math Keita had said this might be the case.  Our first run at restoring the aux laser alignment in the afternoon, still using beamsplitter to OM1 and steering mirror to retroreflection, was diverging when we were moving in the direction we clearly had to move, so we switched to beamsplitter to retroreflection and steering mirror to OM1; alignment went much smoother afterwards.

corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 10:18, Thursday 01 August 2024 (79401)EPO

Tagging for EPO.

H1 AOS (ISC)
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:32, Monday 22 July 2024 - last comment - 10:18, Thursday 01 August 2024(79274)
HAM6 AUX laser alignment (1) (Francisco, Naoki, Betsy, Sheila, Keita)

We aligned the AUX laser in HAM5 so that it is roughly centered on OM1 AND is retroreflected by SRM. We haven't checked anything else.

Retroreflection was measured/evaluated using an iris right in front of the AUX laser launcher telescope. First the iris was well centered relative to the input light (1st attachment shows the scattering around the iris when it was closed down a bit), and we used a steering mirror and a beam splitter installed between the AUX laser and the SRM to get the SRM reflection coming back to the iris AND SRM transmission hitting the center of OM1 without touching SRM. It was easy. 2nd attachment shows the return beam on the iris after REALLY closing down the iris so the return beam clips on it. Centering on OM1 was based on just eyeballing using a sensor card.

We don't know where on the SRM or OFI the beam was (no easy reference). It seems that the beam was seen by ASC-AS_C but not centered on it.

The above was done before we were informed about a large ISI/HEPI rotation in YAW (alog 79272) so probably we'll do it again after moving SRM to compensate to get closer to the right alignment quickly (rather than walking the beam from where we are now slowly, checking the OM1 centering and SRM retroreflection many, many times).

In the end, we should make the SRM transmission hit the center of AS_C, make the beam retro reflected by SRM, and make the SRM reflection hit the center of SR2, all at the same time. For that, probably we'll have to make a minor adjustment to SRM.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - 15:13, Tuesday 23 July 2024 (79287)

We also did a bit more looking at the Fast Shutter. While the optical surface and wires appear fine, there is also a strange heat/burn mark on the side of the toaster optic, low. Possibly the heat mark from the bumper bar above reflected something down to this side surface??

Note, best last pictures of Fast Shutter from last vent are at alog 60724.

Images attached to this comment
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 10:18, Thursday 01 August 2024 (79400)EPO

Tagging for EPO.

Displaying reports 141-160 of 77235.Go to page Start 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 End