This morning at 16:03UTC, Corey heated up OM2 by setting H1:AWC-OM2_TSAMS_POWER_SET to 4.6, plot attached.
I switched off the heater by changing H1:AWC-OM2_TSAMS_POWER_SET back to 0 count at 21:59:37 UTC.
Attached is a plot showing the two thermistors on the OM2 heater (top plots) and kappa C on the bottom right to monitor the optical gain (while doing the darm offset step or before we get to NLN this value is flat as the PCAL line that is used in the calculation is not at its nominal settings).
At 22:00 UTC, Jennie turned this OM2 heater back off.
We plan to stay in commissioning until 23:00UTC to avoid contaminating Observing data with the 78618 "bike chain" glitches from OM2 slipping.
Sheila, Camilla
Camilla then noticed that my angle tuning for FDS above wasn't very good, so she repeated that. 86737
camilla.compton/Documents/sqz/templates/dtt/20250904_SRCLSQZdata.xml and attached.| Type | Time (UTC) | SRCL Offset | Angle | DTT Ref |
| FIS SQZ | 21:09:30 - 21:12:30 | -382 | (-)125.4 | ref 1 |
| FIS SQZ | 21:14:45 - 21:17:45 | -200 | (-)151.0 | ref 2 |
| FIS SQZ | 21:19:30 - 21:22:30 | 0 | (-)211.7 | ref 3 |
Took above data at NLG of 24.0, measaured a few hours ago 86729.
| Type | Time (UTC) | SRCL Offset | Angle | DTT Ref |
| FIS SQZ | 21:44:00 - 21:47:00 | -235 | (-)143.4 | ref 4 |
| FIS Mid + SQZ (tuned to no sqz) | 21:48:00 - 21:51:00 | -235 | (-)151.0 | ref 5 |
| FIS Mid - SQZ (tuned to no sqz) | 21:51:45 - 21:54:45 | -235 | (-)122.6 | ref 6 |
| Mean SQZ (ADF off) | 21:56:00 - 21:59:00 | -235 | N/A | ref 7 |
I used this data and the no sqz data from here to run the so-called "brontosaurus" plot.
The results indicate that the SRCL offset is significantly decreased. The fit gives an offset of -235 ct for the hot OM2, compared to our current -382 ct offset.
at 19:25:38-19:56:30 UTC we went to no sqz with OM2 hot.
There was a 29Hz peak injected by Robert, and this was 1 hour 30 minutes after power up.
In this alog, I showed a plot that compares the CHARD P and INP1 P noise before and after the HAM1 ISI install. Last night, I took the measured CHARD P coupling function and calculated the CHARD P contribution to DARM just before the vent to install the HAM1 ISI, and from a high range time this past weekend, with the HAM1 ISI installed. The attached plot compares DARM before and after the vent and the CHARD P contribution to DARM before and after the vent.
Turns out the change in CHARD noise may have actually directly reduced some noise in DARM. The DARM/CHARD coupling function remained the same before and after the vent, so the improvement is directly due to the reduction of noise in CHARD.
We were running HAM1 feedforward to the pitch ASC before the install, but it varied in performance. My plot in the linked alog shows the best performance achieved, but looking at the data closer to the vent, the noise in CHARD P may have been higher than the best performance I show in the linked alog above.
The low frequency noise in DARM has also changed for other reasons:
Closes FAMIS#37256, last checked 86348
Things to note:
Possible issues:
CS_DUST_LAB1_{300,500}NM both stalled at a value 16 days ago
CS_DUST_DR1_300NM has been at zero for the past four days
CS_DUST_DR1_500NM has been at zero for the past six days
Not an issue:
CS_DUST_LVEA5_300NM has been at 0 for three months - since we turned it off after the vent
CS_DUST_LAB2_{300,500}NM both off as expected (comparing to last month when Ryan C didn't mention it as an issue)
Thu Sep 04 10:05:52 2025 INFO: Fill completed in 5min 48secs
Gerardo confirmed a good fill curbside.
15:59:33 Wed 03sep2025 PDT power glitch. H1 was in lock throughout and no impact on range.
H1 lockloss a few after hitting the 42hr mark for a lock (42hrs03min). At this time we were in at the beginning of 6hr commissioning period and at the time of the lockloss we were about ~10min into running the DARM Offset script for OM2 heating set-up.
Not sure that the DARM offset step caused this as we were almost back at our nominal offset when we lost lock (step 6 out of 7 with H1:OMC-READOUT_X0_OFFSET = 9) which is ~27 mA, nominal is 40 mA.
We checked the lockloss ndscopes and couldn't see any smoking guns when the offset was changing from 8 to 9.
TITLE: 09/04 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 155Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Ibrahim
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
SEI_ENV state: CALM
Wind: 5mph Gusts, 2mph 3min avg
Primary useism: 0.01 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.08 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
Day 2 of being locked since Maintenance (41.5hrs)! Commissioning starts in 12min. All is quiet seismically (microseism is below the 50th percentile even!) and winds are low.
H1 just had it's 3rd superevent in 10hrs 1hr ago (1350utc).
TITLE: 09/04 Eve Shift: 2330-0500 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 151Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Ibrahim
SHIFT SUMMARY: Another very quiet shift with H1 locked and observing throughout, plus one candidate event. H1 has now been locked for 32 hours.
LOG:
FAMIS 28421, last checked in alog86614
Once again, too low of coherence for ITMX, so no new data point there. The most recent point is from the August 19th measurement.
FAMIS 28464, last checked in alog86272
Nothing much out of the ordinary here that I can see aside from the fact that the ITMX SLED is getting awfully close to the 1mW lower power threshold and will likely hit it in the next month.
Two issues I'm seeing in these plots 1) The ITMX HWS SLED is degrading faster than previous SLEDs and 2) There is some weirdness going on with the ITMX CO2 flow meter a week and a half ago.
The rate of degradation of these sleds is often on the order of roughly 2mW/yr. This is why we can generally get about a year's worth out of each SLED. Comparing the last ITMX SLED and the one that we just installed in May (alog84417), the old SLED decayed at a rate of 2.43mW/yr and the new one is 4.2mW/yr. This is just from making some lines in ndscope, so it's pretty rough, but we can definitey say that it is degrading about 2x as fast as the last SLED (attachment 1). The ITMY SLEDs are a bit more consistent at: previous = 2.7mW/yr and new = 2.2mW/yr.
We saw that on the ITMY SLED this last time around that we were still able to see spherical power changes from lock to lock even with the SLED power reporting 0.5mW, and ring heater changes were tough to see (alog84408). Let's consider 0.5mW to be our limit we can take these, but really it should be before we can't see anything, at our current rate this SLED would finish the run at ~0.3mW. Looks like we will need to swap this one before the end of the run.
In Ryan's alog I noticed that the usual change in flow, as reported by the paddle wheel flow meter on the floor, became much more stable on Sunday Aug. 24th. Looking back over two years (attachment 2), it actually looks like the flow has been unusually unstable since returning from the spring vent, and whatever happened on the 24th brought us back to normal. Being a Sunday, there wasn't much going on (alog86540), we were in the middle of a 40+ hour long lock. Zooming into the event doesn't show the laser doing anything during that time, as if it didn't actually see a change in flow. Not sure what's going on here.
A few weeks later and the TCSX flow is still more stable. No idea what happened on that Sunday, but the reported flow looks to be back to what it was pre spring vent.
TITLE: 09/03 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 156Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Ryan S
SHIFT SUMMARY:
Today we had Commissioning time to make up for the time from Monday's holiday. Also had the opportunity to take H1 to the new ASC High Gain mode to ride out a Magnitude 6.0 earthquake! H1 is approaching 26.5hrs of lock.
LOG:
TITLE: 09/03 Eve Shift: 2330-0500 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 151Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Corey
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
SEI_ENV state: CALM
Wind: 8mph Gusts, 3mph 3min avg
Primary useism: 0.05 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.11 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY: H1 has been locked for 26 hours. Sounds like commissioning and riding through earthquakes today all went well.
(Elenna C [in spirit], Ibrahim A, Corey G, Tony S, Jim W)
Summary: H1 survived a magnitude 6.0 EQ in Alaska via new ASC High Gain button/state. This preserved a 24+hr lock. This probably saved us (at minimum 2.5hrs of downtime!): (1) ~90 min for the earthquake seismic noise to die down & (2) for 1-2hrs of locking. L1 went DOWN due to this EQ about 20min after we saw it rolling through LHO!
Had my first experience getting to ENGAGE the new RED "ASC Hi Gn" button (see Elenna's alog) for an earthquake! This tool is still fairly new and "manual" (& cool!) for operators. Main items for engaging at this point (for me, as a newbie) was waiting for SEI_ENV to go to EARTHQUAKE mode and also watched for any colors on the Picket Fence. While we were dealing with this earthquake, Jim walked in to also observe and answer questions for us; Ibrahim also gave advice since he's engaged this EQ mode twice. All the details for what happened are logged below.
How Everything Went "Down"!
2102 VerbalAlarm: "EQ alert for M6.0 in Aleutians" (it said "Incoming earthquake from Canada")
Using Vibration Sensors To Gauge Health Of HVAC Fans Site Wide FAMIS 26592
H0:VAC-EX_FAN2_570_1 & 2 both seem to have gotten significantly more noisy for about 27 hours from 1800 UTC on Sep 1st to 2100 UTC on Sep 2nd
Tried to measure NLG (following 76542) at different ISS setpoints (by changing the SHG waveplate to adjust how much power is incident on the AOM), with the same OPO TRANS power. Because in 86363 we were confused that the NLG increased significantly when we realigned Pump fiber, with the same OPO Trans setpoint.
This was confusing and I'd like to repeat next week. I initially thought we were getting pump depletion so decreased the seed power, but later noticed the ISS was just unable to keep up and the control voltage was dropping to -5 for the low values of ISS setpoint, see attached, it could hold in LOCKED_CLF_DUAL with 80uW OPO_TRANS fine but not with the SEED beam.
| OPO Setpoint | ISS Setpoint when locked on | Amplified | Unamplified | NLG | Notes | |||
| CLF DUAL | SEED | Max | Min | UnAmp | Dark | |||
| 80 | 4.9 | 3.2 | 0.192924 | 0.002389 | 0.0079612 | -2.1e-5 | 24.2 | |
| 80 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 0.045037 | -2.2e-5 | 39 ?(using below unamp) | Pump deplation? Reduced SEED power from 0.7 to 0.3 to keep it locked on SEED (still didn't work first time). | ||
| 80 | 6.3 | 6.3 | 0.0430464 | 0.000546 | 0.0011063 | -2.2e-5 | 38 ? | Unamp signal decreased from SEED power change. |
| 80 | 4.8 | 4.7 | 0.0454944 | 0.0005378 | 0.0018533 | -2.7e-5 | 24.2 | |
| 80 | 2.9 | -5 ? | Noticed ISS Controlmon at -5. | |||||
| 80 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 0.0452317 | 0.00054049 | 0.0018636 | -2.4e-5 | 24.0 | |
| 80 | 4.95 | 0.04523 | 24.0 | Leaving here. | ||||
Repeated while Corey was relocking today. We had one strange measurement when the ISS setpoint at 3.3V where the un-amplified signal was much lower but when later repeating at 3.1V, we didn't see this.
| OPO Setpoint | ISS Setpoint when locked on | Amplified | Unamplified | NLG | |||
| CLF DUAL | SEED | Max | Min | UnAmp | Dark | ||
| 80 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.042961 | 0.00051437 | 0.00176935 | -2.1e-5 | 24.0 |
| 80 | 2.8 | ISS Setpoint dropped to -5, so OPO TRANS not at 80uW | |||||
| 80 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 0.043273 | 0.0005247 | 0.00106713 | -2.1e-5 | 39.7 |
| 80 | 6.2 | 6.2 | 0.041031 | 0.00051677 | 0.0017658 | -2.1e-5 | 23.0 |
| 80 | 6.5 | 6.4 | 0.0409285 | 0.00051425 | 0.00175578 | -2.1e-5 | 23.0 |
| 80 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 0.0429806 | 0.00051216 | 0.00175932 | -2.7e-5 | 24.1 |
| 80 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 0.0431685 | 0.000516166 | 0.0017296 | -2.7e-5 | 24.5 |
| 80 | 2.8 | ISS Setpoint dropped to -5, so OPO TRANS not at 80uW | |||||
| 80 | 4.9 | 4.8 | 0.0429243 | 0.0005134 | 0.0017627 | -2.7e-7 | 24.0 |