Displaying reports 1801-1820 of 85006.Go to page Start 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 End
Reports until 16:03, Wednesday 09 July 2025
LHO General
ibrahim.abouelfettouh@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:03, Wednesday 09 July 2025 (85658)
OPS Eve Shift Start

TITLE: 07/09 Eve Shift: 2330-0500 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Lock Acquisition
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Oli
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: CALM
    Wind: 28mph Gusts, 20mph 3min avg
    Primary useism: 0.11 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.08 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:

IFO is in PREP_FOR_LOCKING and LOCKING

We just finished doing an initial alignment and are now locking.

H1 General (Lockloss)
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:00, Wednesday 09 July 2025 (85657)
Lockloss

Lockloss at 07/09/2025 21:55 UTC after almost 3 hours locked

H1 General (Lockloss)
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:41, Wednesday 09 July 2025 - last comment - 12:07, Wednesday 09 July 2025(85654)
Lockloss

Lockloss at 07/09/2025 17:39 UTC after 1.5 hours, potentially from an ETMX glitch

Comments related to this report
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - 12:07, Wednesday 09 July 2025 (85655)

19:07 UTC Back to Observing

LHO VE
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:31, Wednesday 09 July 2025 (85653)
Wed CP1 Fill

Wed Jul 09 10:07:36 2025 INFO: Fill completed in 7min 32secs

Gerardo confirmed a good fill curbside.

Images attached to this report
H1 ISC
marc.pirello@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:29, Wednesday 09 July 2025 (85652)
Kepco Health Checkup

Yesterday I performed a spot check on all Kepco Supplies early to catch any surprises prior to end of maintenance.  I also staged some upgraded Kepcos because we used some spares last week.

Mezzanine:
All supplies, good temperature, good airflow, no oscillations.

EX:
All supplies, good temperature, good airflow, no oscillations.

EY:
All supplies, good temperature, good airflow, no oscillations.

I took time to record the state of both end station supply racks to update D2300167.

H1 ISC
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:23, Wednesday 09 July 2025 - last comment - 12:58, Wednesday 09 July 2025(85649)
Increased CSOFT P Gain from 20.0 to 25.0 again; works...
J. Kissel, O. Patane

We happened to be catching up with the aLOG at the moment (minutes) the IFO began exhibiting "the" 1 Hz oscillation that has an unknown source and yet has troubling the lock acquisition sequence since the vent (and had gotten worse yesterday after maintenance). We found Elenna mentioned increasing the ASC CSOFT P gain from 20.0 to 25.0 helped last night (LHO:85643), so we repeated that gain increase in CSOFT P with a 5 sec ramp (the ISC_LOCK guardian was mid "INJECT_SQUEEZING;" this state is unrelated to this transient oscillation, as the latter takes ~minutes to ring up, but I mention it to inform outsiders that this is occurring relatively late in the sequence).

The gain increase worked again, and seems to have saved this lock stretch. 

We've accepted a gain of 25.0 for the channel H1:ASC-CSOFT_P_GAIN in the h1asc model's OBSERVE.snap, but will leave it to others to programmatically do this in the guardian (or fix the problem "in hardware" by other means.)
Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
elenna.capote@LIGO.ORG - 10:01, Wednesday 09 July 2025 (85651)

I quickly took two different measurements of CSOFT P right after we locked (Oli was getting the filer cavity locked during this time so we were already out of observing), and it seems like CSOFT P is slowly gaining phase around 1 Hz as we thermalize. This is probably why we need a little extra gain at the start of the lock. Overall, this loop design is just not good, and needs to be fixed! I also don't think we want to always have this gain high once we thermalize.

For now, my hacky fix is this: I have ISC_LOCK set the CSOFT P gain to 25. Then, I added a 30 minute timer to the thermalization guardian. When that timer completes, the CSOFT P gain will be ramped back to 20. I have unmonitored this gain in the SDF for now. I am going to try to get this measurement plotted with a model and try to get this loop redesigned so we don't need this hacky fix. These guardians are loaded, and CSOFT P gain is SDFed back to 20.

Attachment 1: and incredibly mediocre measurement of CSOFT P. Dark blue ref is an old ref from 2023. Green ref was the first measurement I took today, red ref is the second measurement from today. You can see that we seem to gain phase at 1 Hz between the green and red measurements. However, we have a large amount of gain peaking near 1.5 Hz with this higher gain.

Attachment 2: unmonitoring CSOFT P gain.

Images attached to this comment
elenna.capote@LIGO.ORG - 12:58, Wednesday 09 July 2025 (85656)

The thermalization guardian never reduced the gain even though we are 52 minutes into the lock, so I probably made some mistake. However, all is well so far.

H1 General
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:44, Wednesday 09 July 2025 - last comment - 09:01, Wednesday 09 July 2025(85646)
Ops Day Shift Start

TITLE: 07/09 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Lock Acquisition
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Corey
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: CALM
    Wind: 11mph Gusts, 6mph 3min avg
    Primary useism: 0.01 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.05 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:

Relocking and in ACQUIRE_PRMI. Looks like we've been down for a couple hours and the hours before that that we were up we weren't Observing, even though we were in NLN. Normally, Corey would've been called, but it looks like H1 Manager wasn't set up last night so he didn't get called. Also, the operations mode was set to Observing all night, but thankfully that doesn't affect the summary pages.

Comments related to this report
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - 09:01, Wednesday 09 July 2025 (85648)ISC

Looking at earlier in this current lock reacquisition, we had two times where we lost DRMI during DRMI ASC (time1, time2). It looks like an oscillation started 10 - 15 seconds into DRMI ASC that caused DRMI to unlock. In the 10-15 seconds before it unlocked, ASC didn't look like it was doing a very good job anyway. The oscillation is somewhere between 2.5 to 3 ish Hz, but it's a bit variable and even harder to tell during the second time.

Luckily, after running an inital alignment, we were able to lock DRMI and did not see any oscillations or issues with ASC. Our DRMI lock also did not have an oscillation at the beginning of it either like these two did.

Images attached to this comment
Non-image files attached to this comment
LHO General
ibrahim.abouelfettouh@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:56, Tuesday 08 July 2025 - last comment - 09:32, Wednesday 09 July 2025(85645)
OPS Eve Shift Summary

TITLE: 07/09 Eve Shift: 2330-0500 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 142Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Corey
SHIFT SUMMARY:

IFO is in NLN and OBSERVING as of 03:01 UTC (1hr 45 min lock)

We spent roughly 2hrs and 40 min in OMC_WHITENING whilst damping violins since they were rung up by TFs that Oli and Jeff took in the morning and afternoon. Violins continue to decrease, reducing by about 1 order of magnitude strain throughout this shift.

Our range is somewhat low but I cannot see that this is due to squeezing since the trace is as low as it is when we are in FDS.

SDFs were accepted and are screenshotted.

LOG:

None

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - 07:51, Wednesday 09 July 2025 (85647)

I've reverted the SR2 dackill time to 1200 (sdf)

Images attached to this comment
elenna.capote@LIGO.ORG - 09:32, Wednesday 09 July 2025 (85650)

Looks like a CSOFT Y gain was SDFed to a different value than the guardian sets it. My fault, I changed it while messing around with gains to avoid the 1 Hz instability and forgot to revert it. There were several other SDF diffs that did need to be accepted, so this one was missed.

H1 General
ibrahim.abouelfettouh@LIGO.ORG - posted 20:06, Tuesday 08 July 2025 (85644)
OPS Midshift Update

We just made it to NLN and OBSERVING after roughly 2 hours and 40 minutes of violin mode damping. Violins are still high but going down. 

H1 ISC
elenna.capote@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:27, Tuesday 08 July 2025 (85643)
1 Hz ringing may have been averted by boosting CSOFT P gain

Today we had one lockloss from a growing 1 Hz oscillation. It's hard to tell where it is coming from, but it appears in several ASC signals and the buildups. We have tried several things in the past to avert this problem. Today I tried bumping up the CSOFT P gain to 25. This action seems to be coincident with the oscillation turning around and damping back down. I'm not completely sure it helped, but it's something to try! Before today, it has turned around on its own without intervention. It also doesn't happen every time we lock.

H1 General
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:49, Tuesday 08 July 2025 (85642)
Ops Day Shift End

TITLE: 07/08 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Preventive Maintenance
INCOMING OPERATOR: Ibrahim
SHIFT SUMMARY: Attempting to relock and in ENGAGE_ASC_FOR_FULL_IFO. We've had bad luck attempting to relock after maintenance. Last night there were a lot of issues with trying to relock, and once we started relocking after maintenance today, we realized why. Once DRMI ASC turned on, SRC1 started getting pulled away, and we realized that it was because there were offsets in the filter banks that are not supposed to be there. Elenna and gang had noticed that yesterday as well (85593), and had tried to correct it, but appearently there were other places where SRC1 offsets were set and turned on that got missed. We found these today and corrected it. After that we had a lockloss while we were in OMC_WHITENING waiting for violins to damp because of a 1 Hz oscillation (ndscope). We tried relocking and sat in MOVE_SPOTS to try and take some measurements to determine where the oscillation had come from, but we had a lockloss from an earthquake during that time. We then just sat in DOWN for a while and took some measurements to see if we could find the cause of the oscillation, but we just ruled some things out (85639, 85641).
LOG:

14:30 Relocking and in an initial alignment. I put us to IDLE after input align offloaded so we could start maintenance
18:37 Relocking start
    - Initial alignement
        - SRY wouldn't lock, so Elenna touched up SRM
    - Once DRMI ASC turned on, SRC1 started getting pulled away. This was due to offsets in SRC1 being turned on - related to 85593 - lockloss from OFFLOAD_DRMI_ASC
    - Lockloss from OMC_WHITENING due to 1Hz ASC ringup
    - Lockloss from MOVE_SPOTS due to earthquake. We had been sitting in MOVE_SPOTS while running tests to try adn figure out the cause of the oscillation earlier.

Start Time System Name Location Lazer_Haz Task Time End
14:41 FAC Kim EX n Tech clean 15:56
14:41 FAC Nellie quick MY, then EY n Tech clean 15:47
14:43 FAC Randy, Ken LVEA n HAM3 cable tray work 17:30
14:44 FAC Chris YARM n FAMIS tasks 16:29
15:06 VAC Janos, Gerardo EY n CP7 troubleshooting 17:09
15:15 EE Marc CER, EX, EY n Listening for sad fans 17:25
15:15 SUS Jeff, Oli CR n ITM R0, TMSX, MC2, SR2, FCs, ETMs, PR2 OLTFs 18:29
15:22 VAC Jordan, Anna LVEA n Swapping pump controller 16:16
15:24 FAC Eric EY n Checking out tripped chiller pump circuit breaker 15:57
15:27 FAC Tyler LVEA, Mids, Ends n FAMIS tasks, helping Eric at EY 17:00
15:28 EE Fil LVEA n Swapping satamps for SR2, ITMs 18:02
16:19 FAC Mitchell Mids, EX n FAMIS tasks, 3IFO 17:16
16:19 FAC Kim, Nellie LVEA n Tech clean 17:31
16:30 FAC Chris LVEA n FAMIS tasks, battery checks 18:07
16:37 PEM Robert, Leo, Sam, Tooba, Carlos Roof, LVEA n Tour 18:06
16:44 ISC Jennie, Rahul OpticsLab y(local) ISS array (Jennie out 17:46) 17:49
16:56 FAC RyanC EX, EY n Checking dust monitors 18:12
17:15 ISC Keita OpticsLab y(local) ISS inventory 17:49
17:50 ISC Rahul, Keita MY, then OpticsLab n Grabbing ISS array 3IFO and taking to optics lab 17:58
17:58 ISC Keita VacPrep Lab n inventory 19:18
17:59   Rahul OpticsLab n Grabbing stuff quickly 18:02
18:00 EPO Mike + tour LVEA n Tour 18:59
18:08 FAC Kim, Nellie HAM Shack n Tech clean 18:51
18:29 PEM Robert LVEA n Hooking up cables for commissioning 18:40
18:30 FAC RyanC OpticsLab, VacPrep Lab n Checking dust monitors 18:44
18:30 VAC Gerardo, Jordan EX n Picking up parts 18:55
18:44 EPO Elenna + Detchar LVEA n Tour 19:05
19:00   Betsy, Fil LVEA n Sweep + grabbing flashlight (Fil out 19:05) 19:07
20:00 FAC Randy MY n 3IFO forklifting 21:19
20:48 ISC Jennie, Rahul OpticsLab y(local) ISS Array 21:14
22:28 ISC Keita VacPrep n Inventory 23:35
Images attached to this report
H1 SUS
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:37, Tuesday 08 July 2025 (85641)
(some) ITMX M0/R0 OLTFs taken to check for inconsistancies after satamp swap

Troubleshooting the 1 Hz lockloss we had earlier from OMC_WHITENING, there was some thought that it could be related to the ITMs' damping loops after the satamp swaps today. While we were sitting in DOWN recovering from an earthquake, we took the opportunity to take some OLTFs to compare to the measurements we took before the swaps.

These measurements all look pretty similar to before the satamp swap, so we don't think there's anything with the satamps that would be causing this.

ITMX M0
- In HEALTH_CHECK
- Took measurements for L, R, P, Y (note that the new loop suppression for Y is higher by 2 bc the 'before' measurement was taken with the damping gain at -0.5 while this 'after' measurement was taken with the gain at -1)
- Found in /ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/QUAD/H1/ITMX/SAGM0/Data/2025-07-08_2230_H1SUSITMX_M0_WhiteNoise_{L,R,P,Y}_0p02to50Hz_OpenLoopGainTF.xml r12413

ITMX R0
- In HEALTH_CHECK
- Took measurements for Y
- Found in /ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/QUAD/H1/ITMX/SAGR0/Data/2025-07-08_2250_H1SUSITMX_R0_WhiteNoise_Y_0p02to50Hz_OpenLoopGainTF.xml r12414

Images attached to this report
H1 SUS (ISC)
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:20, Tuesday 08 July 2025 - last comment - 14:30, Monday 13 October 2025(85639)
H1SUSITMY L2DAMP P and R Open Loop Gain TFs
E. Capote, J. Kissel, S.Dwyer

The ~1 Hz ring-up that had been marginally stable and transient is now fully unstable during the lock acquisition sequence as we recover from maintenance. The suspicion is that the change in ITM M0/R0 satamps might have changed the top mass damping loop OLGTF enough to augment the damped plant that's the plant for the never-really-well-designed L2DAMP that takes the L2 (or PUM) OSEMs and feeds back their sensor signal to the reaction chain top mass OSEMs actuators. But also, we've never measured these loops in any substantial form, so we wanted to just see what they were doing.

Attached are the results. Here're the templates:
    /ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/QUAD/H1/ITMY/SAGR0/Data/
        2025-07-08_2240UTC_H1SUSITMY_R0_WhiteNoise_0p02to50Hz_L2DAMP_OLGTF_P.xml
        2025-07-08_2240UTC_H1SUSITMY_R0_WhiteNoise_0p02to50Hz_L2DAMP_OLGTF_R.xml

Very little loop gain and only at 3.3 Hz. The loop stability is questionable at that frequency -- for a few averages the suppression (i.e. the gain peaking) looks really sharp around 3.3 Hz. 
T'was really tough to get good coherence; the excitation is pretty well tailored, but it's tough to fight the 1/f^6 suppression of the physical suspension and dirt coupling.
I had to turn OFF the R0 alignment offsets to get this data for pitch. (They were ON for the Roll measurement).

So -- perhaps not the source of the ~1 Hz IFO instability, but boy could this loop use some TLC in order to more effectively achieve its goals...
Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 14:30, Monday 13 October 2025 (87447)
FYI, we also took ITMX data for these loops as well.
    /ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/QUAD/H1/ITMX/SAGR0/Data
        2025-07-08_2240UTC_H1SUSITMX_R0_WhiteNoise_0p02to50Hz_L2DAMP_OLGTF_P.xml
        2025-07-08_2240UTC_H1SUSITMX_R0_WhiteNoise_0p02to50Hz_L2DAMP_OLGTF_R.xml
Images attached to this comment
H1 SQZ (ISC, SQZ)
jennifer.wright@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:12, Wednesday 17 April 2024 - last comment - 10:37, Wednesday 09 July 2025(77213)
OMC Scan with SQZ beam yesterday

Naoki, Vicky, Jennie W

 

Naoki followed the directions in to set up the SQZ beam OMC scan.

We had a problem with the DC centering loops. After we switched them on they saturated the OM1 and OM2 suspensions.

We got around this by switching each of the 4 degrees of freedom on first - ie. DC3 Y, DC3 P, DC4 Y, DC4 P.

Then we engaged OMC ASC and this seemed to work ok.

When we tried to manually lock the OMC length loop we had problems as when we switched the gain of 1 on it would lose lock, even when on a TM00 mode of the expected height (0.6mA on DCPD_SUM).

Vicky got around this this using a lower gain and not engaging the BOOST filter in the servo filter bank.

Then she had to touch up the alignment in lock with OM3.

locked quiet time 1397329970 GPS 1 min:

OMC-REFL_A_LF_OUT16 = 0.0930255 mW

OMC-DCPD_SUM_OUTPUT = 0.652156 mA

 

unlocked quiet time 1397330106 GPS 1 minute:

OMC-REFL_A_LF_OUT16  = 1.04825 mW

OMC-DCPD_SUM_OUTPUT = -0.00133668 mA

 

dark measurement 1397330625 GPS 1 minute:

OMC-REFL_A_LF_OUT16  = -0.0133655 mW

OMC-DCPD_SUM_OUTPUT = -0.00133668 mA

 

I noticed after I took the dark measurement that OM1 and 2 were staurating again and need to clear history twice on OM1 to remove this.

Reverted OM1 and 2, 3 OMC sliders at 8:33 am (local time) on the 16th April.

Data is saved as REf 3, 4 and 5 in /ligo/home/jennifer.wright/Documents/OMC_scan/2024_04_16_OMC_scan.xml. Where 3 is the scan channel OMC-DCPD_SUM_OUT_DQ on the bottom right plot, 4 is the PZT excitation channel OMC-PZT2_EXC on the bottom left plot, and 5 is the monitor of the actual PZT output voltage OMC-PZT2_MON_DC_OUT_DQ on the top right plot.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jennifer.wright@LIGO.ORG - 20:43, Monday 06 May 2024 (77672)

Using Sheila's code from this entry and updating the code with the current OMC values for transmission of the mirrors:

Tio = 7670e-6 #according to T1500060 page 116 input and output mirror transmission

R_inBS = 1-7400e-6

The outout of the code gives us the following values for the cavity incident power, efficiency and finesse:

Power on refl diode when cavity is off resonance: 1.062 mW

Incident power on OMC breadboard (before QPD pickoff): 1.078 mW

Power on refl diode on resonance: 0.106 mW

Measured effiency (DCPD current/responsivity if QE=1)/ incident power on OMC breadboard: 70.5 %

assumed QE: 100 %

power in transmission (for this QE) 0.760 mW

HOM content infered: 8.748 %

Cavity transmission infered: 77.827 %

predicted efficiency () (R_inputBS * mode_matching * cavity_transmission * QE): 70.493 %

omc efficency for 00 mode (including pick off BS, cavity transmission, and QE): 77.251 %

round trip loss: 2063 (ppm)

Finesse: 362.923

 

I need to compare the HOM content measurement with that derived from the mode scan.

jennifer.wright@LIGO.ORG - 10:37, Wednesday 09 July 2025 (85637)

Just realising now that I need this data that I never posted the results of the OMC scanm with this squeezed beam for the ZM4 = 120, ZM5 = 137 PSAMS settings.

The analysis was run with /labutils/omc_scan/fit_two_peaks_no_sidebands10.py and the function this uses to fit the whole scan is OMCscan_no_sidebands10.py, this code is in the /ligo/gitcommon/labutils/omc_scan repository but in the dev branch.

The first graph shows the full scan, the second zoomed in on the fit for the CO2 mode, since the astigmatism in our OMC is too small to resolve the two modes this fit has less value than with the old OMC.

To work out mode-matching it is probably enough to use the C02 height from the data and not the fit.

Non-image files attached to this comment
Displaying reports 1801-1820 of 85006.Go to page Start 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 End