Displaying reports 1901-1920 of 77271.Go to page Start 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 End
Reports until 07:14, Monday 06 May 2024
H1 DetChar (DetChar)
aloysius.niko@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:14, Monday 06 May 2024 (77638)
LHO DQ SHift Report (20240429-20240505)

DQSHIFT 20240429-20240505

Here is DQ Shift Report During this week :

LHO General
ibrahim.abouelfettouh@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:05, Monday 06 May 2024 (77636)
OPS Eve Shift Summary

TITLE: 05/06 Eve Shift: 23:00-07:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 151Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Ryan S
SHIFT SUMMARY:

IFO is in NLN and OBSERVING (6 hr 31 min lock). This is the longest lock in the last 24 hrs (4 brief locks in between).

I did not experience any of the issues that occured earlier in the week.

The squeezer phase angle had to be adjusted after 2-3 hrs (noticed the range going down, then noticed the SQZ not at its optimum) and was able to bring the range back up to what it was prior.
 

LOG:

None

LHO General
ibrahim.abouelfettouh@LIGO.ORG - posted 20:06, Sunday 05 May 2024 (77635)
OPS Eve Midshift Update

IFO is in NLN and Observing as of 00:33 UTC (2 hr 35 min lock)

Nothing else of note

H1 AOS
robert.schofield@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:08, Sunday 05 May 2024 - last comment - 09:20, Tuesday 07 May 2024(77633)
New ESD bias settings for ITMX (0 V), ITMY (-222 V), and ETMY (200 V) to minimize electronics ground noise coupling

Anamaria, Sheila, Robert

We scanned the biases for three test masses to find the coupling minimum for currents that we injected onto the building ground. The optimal ETMY bias was 115 V in January of 2023, 170 V in Aug. (72308) and 200 V now.  With ITMX at 0V, the optimal for ITMY was 60 V in March of 2023 (68053) and -222 V now, The figure shows some of the bias scans.

Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 13:28, Monday 06 May 2024 (77656)

On the 2nd, Robert Anamaria and I found settings that would set the biases to these values, but the EY value hasn't been correctly applied in the automated relocks since. (77647

For ETMY, L3_LOCK_BIAS_OFFSET should be -4.9 while the L3_LOCK_BIAS_GAIN is -1 to produce a voltage readback of 200V.    I've reset this in the guardian, which I might have done last week with a typo.

camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - 09:20, Tuesday 07 May 2024 (77677)

This has now been loaded so shoud be at the correct value from 16:00UTC 07 May 2024 77674 .

H1 AOS (DetChar)
robert.schofield@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:02, Sunday 05 May 2024 - last comment - 15:16, Monday 06 May 2024(77631)
Two un-identified stray beams in HAM3, one measuring more than 20 mW

Anamaria, Robert

We photographed, from a second angle, the beamspot of a stray beam that I noticed last visit (76969 - Fig. 3 ). The photos (Figure 1) confirm that there is indeed a bright stray beam hitting, at a grazing angle, the bellows and other parts of the spool piece between HAM3 and the IMC tube.

I also wanted to measure the power of the stray beam that had been producing a large 48 Hz peak in DARM during early O3, in order to improve my scattering coupling calculations. This is the beam that reflects off of the PR2 scraper baffle and hits the illuminator viewport on HAM3, which we mitigated by inserting a black-glass viewport cover (52184). We were surprised by how bright the beam is, reaching 20 mW on the power meter (see Figure 2), even though we could not fit the whole beam on the meter. We estimate that the beam may reach 60  mW.

Finally, we made movies as we swept the ITMY compensation plate, hoping to see some indication of where the ghost beams are hitting, but did not. We will have to wait until Alena gives us the likely position of the CP ghost beams based on the angles that Anamaria showed us how to measure.

Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
minhyo.kim@LIGO.ORG - 06:31, Monday 06 May 2024 (77637)

Minhyo, Anamaria,

I've calculated the point at which the tail of the Gaussian laser beam should touch the PR2 scraper baffle to reflect about 60 mW, following Anamaria's idea.

Assuming that the estimated beam size at the PR2 scraper baffle is 7.47 mm, and the total beam power is 3 kW, the beam touches the side of the PR2 scraper baffle's hole at a position 15 mm away (4 sigma) from the center of the beam. I'll include the calculation later on how the beam is actually positioned within the 70 mm aperture of the PR2 scraper baffle.

robert.schofield@LIGO.ORG - 10:49, Monday 06 May 2024 (77645)

The original alog referenced above (52184) has photos that show that the aperture of the baffle is visible at the same location as the beam when the interferometer is unlocked, and argues that this means that the beam is hitting the edge of the baffle aperture.

minhyo.kim@LIGO.ORG - 12:51, Monday 06 May 2024 (77651)

Minhyo

1) Made typo in above comment from mine. The estimated beam radius 7.67 mm -> 7.47 mm (edited on the original comment as well)

2) I'll elaborate the result of calculation in above (15 mm from the center) in below: 

Assuming the total power is 3 kW, the percentage of 60 mW power is 0.002%. Since the percentage of normal distribution for 4 sigma is 99.9937%, the partial integration in the upper limit is around 0.0032%.

Using this approximate number, I searched for the exact number to produce 0.002% with a 2D Gaussian beam model with a 3 kW power and 7.47 mm radius. From the beam model, it showed that integration from 4.11 sigma produces a power of around 0.0604 mW, suggesting that the beam is clipped at a point around 14.94 mm (4.11 sigma) from the center of the beam. I have attached a summary figure of my calculation.

Images attached to this comment
anamaria.effler@LIGO.ORG - 15:16, Monday 06 May 2024 (77664)

Rechecked situation at LLO: https://alog.ligo-la.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=70996

TLDR: we see the same, but seems much lower power. Will measure when we get the chance.

H1 General (Lockloss)
ibrahim.abouelfettouh@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:36, Sunday 05 May 2024 - last comment - 16:56, Sunday 05 May 2024(77630)
Lockloss 23:35 UTC

Lockloss due to local EQ in Idaho (EQ mode activated but wwasn't enough it seems).

Comments related to this report
ibrahim.abouelfettouh@LIGO.ORG - 16:56, Sunday 05 May 2024 (77632)

Actually it was a 4.4 in north Utah (just showed up on USGS)

H1 General
anthony.sanchez@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:09, Sunday 05 May 2024 (77629)
Sunday Ops Day Shift End

TITLE: 05/05 Day Shift: 15:00-23:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 152Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Ibrahim
SHIFT SUMMARY:
Overall summery is that it's been earthquaking all day.

Another Incoming 5.6 mag Earthquake
Took this time to do another Initial_Alignment while the earthquake passed.

Reached Observing for the 3rd time today at 22:36 UTC

LOG:
no log

 

LHO General
ibrahim.abouelfettouh@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:05, Sunday 05 May 2024 (77628)
OPS Eve Shift Start

TITLE: 05/05 Eve Shift: 23:00-07:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 149Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Tony
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: CALM
    Wind: 16mph Gusts, 12mph 5min avg
    Primary useism: 0.03 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.11 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:

IFO is in NLN and OBSERVING (47 min lock)

H1 General (Lockloss)
anthony.sanchez@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:04, Sunday 05 May 2024 - last comment - 13:47, Sunday 05 May 2024(77626)
Sunday Ops Mid Day Report.

TITLE: 05/05 Day Shift: 15:00-23:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 149Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Ryan S
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: EARTHQUAKE
    Wind: 19mph Gusts, 17mph 5min avg
    Primary useism: 0.15 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.13 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
First lock:
Ran Initial Alignment
Started Locking 15:28 UTC
Held in ENGAGE_DRMI_ASC for a 3-4 Minutes minutes after reading alog
https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=77622

Had no problems in DRMI Locking.
Had no problems in Transition_From_ETMX

Incoming 5.4 Mag Earthquake from Papua New Guinea
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us6000mwhz/executive

NLN Reached at 16:16 UTC
Observing reached at 16:19 UTC

Unknown lockloss 16:47 UTC https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~lockloss/index.cgi?event=1398962851
Screenshots attached to alog. 

Relocking:
Tried a few times to get above DRMI. Made it to Check_AS_SHUTTERS then Lockloss.
Trying another Initial_Alignment just incase it is an Alignment issue before I start exploring more exotic issue.

5.4 Mag Earthquake off the coast of Ecuador
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us6000mwij/executive

Stopped at DRMI_LOCKED_PREP_ASC, Changed H1:LSC-PRCL1_GAIN from 8 to 4.
then proceeded to Transition_DRMI_To_3F where I stopped again to change the gain back to 8.

6.2 Mag Earthquake from Indonesia
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us6000mwjd/executive
I think we May have Survived this!

But we have 2 more 4.9's coming in from Chile.... I guess we will find out.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
anthony.sanchez@LIGO.ORG - 13:47, Sunday 05 May 2024 (77627)Lockloss
Images attached to this comment
LHO VE
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:30, Sunday 05 May 2024 (77625)
Sun CP1 Fill

Sun May 05 10:13:13 2024 INFO: Fill completed in 13min 9secs

Images attached to this report
H1 CDS
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:47, Sunday 05 May 2024 (77624)
Atomic clock timing reference jumped by 0.29 S at 04:16 UTC Sunday 5 May 2024

The atomic clock timing reference signal, which is being monitored by the MSR timing comparator, jumped by 0.29 seconds 04:16:16 UTC (21:16 Sat 04may2024 PDT).

This is the cause of the "C" in the timing status on the CDS Overview. This is a reference only, we will investigate Monday.

Images attached to this report
H1 General
anthony.sanchez@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:16, Sunday 05 May 2024 (77623)
Sunday Ops Morning shift Start

TITLE: 05/05 Day Shift: 15:00-23:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Lock Acquisition
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Ryan S
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: CALM
    Wind: 15mph Gusts, 11mph 5min avg
    Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.10 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
When I arrived H1 was LOCKING_ALS.
I let it try to lock itself twice. First it made it up to LOCKING_ALS before a lockloss. and on the second attempt it made it up to Engage_DRMI_ASC.
I then took ISC Lock to Initial Alignment.

EX had some ground moovement with might be coupled with the wind as it seems to be gusting. Though it looked strange because EY did not have the same apparent ground motion. We are expecting an R wave to hit from a 5.4 Mag Earthquake as well.

So Hopefully after the IA we should be goo to get locked again.

 

 

LHO General
ibrahim.abouelfettouh@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:13, Sunday 05 May 2024 (77622)
OPS Eve Shift Summary

TITLE: 05/05 Eve Shift: 23:00-07:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 157 Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Ryan S
SHIFT SUMMARY:

IFO is in NLN and OBSERVING as of 05:57 UTC (1hr 17 min lock)

Much of the shift was spent troubleshooting locking issues in the interferometer. There were mainly two issues. (lockloss alog 77620 and alog 77615).

BS Glitch/PRCL Buzzing 

This issue was characterized by locklosses that occured during TURN_ON_BS_STAGE_2 and ENGAGE_DRMI_ASC. There would be a kick seen primarily in the ST1 T240 and L4C channels (Screenshots 1 and 2). Initially, this was thought to be a BS glitch. I first noted this issue in alog 77615 but as this alog states, we have been experiencing this for quite a while. During the DAY shift, Sheila and Tony found that in fact, this may be an issue with the PRCL gain being too high, causing a 100Hz buzzing (Screenshot 3). Relevant alogs include: alog 77574, alog 77573 (which detail Solution 1), and alog 77583 (Solution 2)

Temporary Solution 1:

Wait in ENGAGE_DRMI_ASC for ASC to converge more than guardian needs it to in order to mitigate the effects of possible BS kicks. From roughly 9-10 locklosses of this species, this worked around 6-7 times.

Temporary Solution 2:

Request and stay in ACQUIRE_DRMI_1F, change the PRCL1 gain from 8 to 4, continue to TRANSITION_DRMI_TO_3F and then change it back. This worked every time I tried this (3 times) and is the better solution.

Transition from ETMX

This issue was characterized by locklosses that occured either towards the very end of TRANSITION_FROM_ETMX or just as guardian reached LOWNOISE_ESD_ETMX and is part of an ongoing trend that is mostly detailed in alog 77359 where every time this state is run, there is a glitch in the 10-15 seconds leading upto the transtion of states. The alog notes that while investigations are ongoing, this seems to be something that ramp time and filter changes would fix. (screenshot 4 and 5). The alog also notes that locklosses in this state are most prevalent during periods of high wind. This issue has NOT been fixed and we were only able to survive it due to decreasing wind microseism. As we approached this state, after losing lock here twice, I checked the wiki/Jenne's troubleshooting doc and made calls to 3 people on the call list but either they could not help or there was no answer. Thankfully, a 4th person's Saturday night wasn't interrupted because the wind calmed down enough to survive this. Screenshot 4 shows a lockloss during this state while Screenshot 5 shows us surviving it - both have the glitch.

Other:

I expect to continue investigating both these issues tomorrow and wanted to get to them today but spent around 6.5 hours locking and 0.5 hrs eating. Given we are in observing for sufficiently long, I will look into each lockloss per Sheila's on the phone and alogged advice (and hopefully find with something meaningful to alog).

LOG:

None

Images attached to this report
H1 General (Lockloss)
ibrahim.abouelfettouh@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:29, Saturday 04 May 2024 - last comment - 22:24, Saturday 04 May 2024(77620)
Lockloss DRMI (4:16 UTC)

DRMI Lockloss unknown reason

ALS and DRMI had already lost lock by the time I was back from making dinner - ALS seems very unstable, which is new issue not seen in the past 5 hrs of locking.

Comments related to this report
ibrahim.abouelfettouh@LIGO.ORG - 22:24, Saturday 04 May 2024 (77621)

Another Lockloss at TRANSITION_FROM_ETMX. Can confirm via trends (to be posted in longer summary alog) that the behavior of the suspensions trended follow those in Camilla's alog 77359 from April 23rd. Shall consult comissioners before playing with filters.

LHO General
ibrahim.abouelfettouh@LIGO.ORG - posted 20:00, Saturday 04 May 2024 - last comment - 20:24, Saturday 04 May 2024(77618)
OPS Eve Midshift Update

Still Relocking after last NLN lockloss at 23:15 UTC - experiencing a whole host of problems

In the meantime we've had the following issues, with locklosses listed in the lockloss alog 77615:

- BS Glitch and other DRMI locklosses 8 times. The glitch locklosses (4 of these 8 losses) were overcome by waiting at ENGAGE_DRMI_ASC while ASC converges to mitigate the glitch kick. That being said, DRMI is extremely unstable in ENGAGE_DRMI_ASC and lost lock here 2 times right as ASC converged.

- Unknown locklossest at TRANSITION_FROM_ETMX and after initial alignment, LOWNOISE_ESD_ETMX

- IR Not found (also after initial alignment).

I already ran initial alignment and don't think this is the problem. Have troubleshot using Jenne's ppt to no avail. The problem is that I essentially have to wait 1 hr (for the EX Transition issue) before experiencing a lockloss. Having done an initial alignment between EX Transition locklosses, I think it's worth assuming that that didn't fix the issue so I'll resort to the call list when I'm near EX Transition.

Comments related to this report
ibrahim.abouelfettouh@LIGO.ORG - 20:24, Saturday 04 May 2024 (77619)

UPDATE: Just made it past ETMX Transition for the first time since lockloss 4hrs and 15 minutes ago - slowly getting there.

H1 SUS (SUS)
rahul.kumar@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:35, Saturday 04 May 2024 - last comment - 18:35, Sunday 05 May 2024(77608)
Violin damping ETMX mode 09

Tony, Rahul

ETMX09 was rung up (even though Ibrahim had set the gains off last night) and Tony was trying to fight the Guardian to try and damp this mode early this morning. We were out of Observing (for 15mins while we were figuring it out) and struggling to get in (violins too high message). Hence, at first we set the nominal values of gain in lscparam to zero, then set the violin damping guardian to Damp_Violins_Full_Power and then applied a fraction of the nominal gain. This seems to be slowly damping the mode.

Also then Tony was able to move back to Observing.

Will keep a watch over this mode (and others if needed) until we fully damp it.

Comments related to this report
rahul.kumar@LIGO.ORG - 18:35, Sunday 05 May 2024 (77634)SUS

I have updated the lscparams and loaded the Violin Guardian with the new gain settings for ETMX mode 09 as given below,

FM1+FM10 Gain = -6.0, Max gain = -8.0

Displaying reports 1901-1920 of 77271.Go to page Start 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 End