Displaying report 1-1 of 1.
Reports until 12:59, Friday 05 September 2014
H1 AOS (SUS)
borja.sorazu@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:59, Friday 05 September 2014 (13776)
ESD charge measurements at EMTX and ETMY Borja's final results + Ion pumps are definitely the chargers!

(Borja)

It has taken me a bit longer than I thought to write back here the final results to proof that the ion pumps are the main chargers of the ETMX and ETMY masses at LHO.

But finally here is the proof. This entry completes my previous entry here. In that entry we saw that when closing the ion pump gate valve at ETMY the charge values for all the quadrants and both orientations (pitch and yaw) became stable. The next obvious question was; what would happen when the ion pump gate valve was opened again?

The answer, shown next, is that the charge in all quadrants begin to vary again as you would expect if the ion pump was the main charger.

The next plots are a summary of all measurements I took at ETMY. The first set of 2 plots is Veff values in pitch and yaw and the second set of 2 plots is the slopes in pitch and yaw respectively. In pink are the set of measurements when the ion pump gate valve was closed (see the stability of the charge for nearly 6 days!) and in red are the measurements when the gate valve was reopened. It took almost a day of having the gate valve open to be able to see charge variations in all quadrants but these changes are considerable. In particular notice the quadrants UR and LL which changed charge from -140 to nearly discharge values. Remember that the labelling of the quadrants in these plots corresponds to the quadrant labelling on the CDS models which does not correspond with the real quadrants being driven. In particular the quadrant labelled LL is actually the driven quadrant UL. Which means that the quadrants suffering higher charge differences when opening the ion pump gate valve are the upper quadrants of the ETMY mass.

The question now is; How can the ion pump have such a quick charging effect in ETMY but we observed no charging effect at ETMX? Again I have the answer here: because we did not wait long enough at ETMX to see the charging effect. Fortunately despite not observing a charging effect in ETMX I did keep taking regular charging measurements on that mass with the ion pump gate valve open for 6 days. Next I plot the summary of all my measurements at ETMX (like I did above for ETMY). The area in pink shows all the measurements with the ion pump gate valve open. It is obvious the charge variations in comparison with all previous measurements at End-X with the ion pump gate valve close. In particular, for the first time at ETMX, we observe negative charges in some quadrants during the time in which the ion pump gate valve was opened.

I have attached to this aLog a compilation of the Veff and slope values for both pitch and yaw of all the measurements I did at End-X and End-Y and the time of those measurements. These data is given as a word file and as a Matlab file for easy operation. I also have included the Matlab figure versions of the above summary plots.

And finally for completeness I have also attached the pdf files with the last set of measurements both at ETMY and ETMX.

Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
Displaying report 1-1 of 1.