Reports until 17:10, Monday 20 August 2018
H1 SEI (SEI, SUS)
edgard.bonilla@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:10, Monday 20 August 2018 - last comment - 22:34, Monday 20 August 2018(43540)
ISIFF almost all TFs taken for full L-P feedforward

Edgard B.

Following up on LHO:43512 and LHO:43513, I continued gathering transfer functions for designing QUADs the full Length-Pitch ISIFF filter.

I took almost all of the transfer functions needed for the ISIFF in every single QUAD.The only pair missing are M0 drive P in ETMY and ITMY. 

_________________________________________________________________________________________

All of the templates+measurements are saved with date of Aug 19 in:

/ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/QUAD/H1/[]/Common/Data/
   2018-08-19_H1SUS[]_M0_ISIFF_FilterDesign_ST2L_M0_TF.xml
   2018-08-19_H1SUS[]_M0_ISIFF_FilterDesign_ST2L_M0_TF.xml

Where [] is either ITMY, ETMY, ITMX or ETMX.

Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
edgard.bonilla@LIGO.ORG - 22:34, Monday 20 August 2018 (43552)SEI, SUS

I calculated the FF filters for ETMX and ITMX using the measurements and the attached code.

The filters are shown in the second attachment, and there are a couple of things to note, broken down per QUAD here:

ETMX:

- Determining the L to L filter is easy (attachment 2, page 1).  L2L = 2730 N/m = 2.12 [cts/nm]. This is about what I expected for this filter, as I made a pure DC measurement for it earlier in the week (shown in the 1st attachment) and obtained 2.16 [cts/nm].

- The L2P filter is to be determined by choosing a suitable lever arm factor l_eff=L2P/L2L. This factor is shown in page 3 of the pdf, note that the phase of l_eff is ~60 degrees. After checking the source for such an strange behavior, it turns out it is an artifact of having a really low l_eff, which makes it almost impossible to determine it properly. In conclusion:

      + From the DC Measurement I estimated l_eff ~ 6.4 E-5 m.

      + If I take the real part of the value at 0.25 Hz in the second attachment, figure 3. l_eff ~ 8.5 E-5 m.

     + Since this values are so small (see, for example, ITMX below) , I think it might be better to set up the length filter and set L2P=0 and tune L2P manually from there if necessary.

ITMX:

- Attachment 2 , figure 4 shows the L2L filter, from there we I estimate a value of  L2L = 2820 N/m = 2.19 [cts/nm].

- from the data on figure 6 we estimate l_eff=1 E-3 m. Note there are no problems with the phase of this one and it is at least one order of magnitude larger.

 

 

 

Images attached to this comment
Non-image files attached to this comment