Reports until 00:58, Saturday 01 February 2014
H1 ISC
kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:58, Saturday 01 February 2014 - last comment - 01:14, Tuesday 04 February 2014(9736)
PRMI locking very stable and the ITMY ring heater on

Stefan, Kiwamu

The PRMI lock is now quite solid. After we engaged a dither alignment system for ITMY, we turned on the ring heater on ITMY with a hope it is going to improve the mode matching.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - 01:09, Saturday 01 February 2014 (9737)

We lost the lock after about 50 minutes.

Images attached to this comment
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - 16:09, Monday 03 February 2014 (9767)
Below are Aiden's plot and remarks:

I've attached some plots of thermal lens vs time for a RH running at 1W.

The slope of the linear section, dS/dt, from t = 2000s to 3000s is 6.75E-9 diopters per second per Watt.

The final steady-state defocus, S_steady, is about 13.75E-6 diopters. In the initial state, it takes t_S_steady1, 2037 (= 13.75E-6/6.75E-9) seconds to reach assuming an immediate and linear increase in defocus, 
t_S_steady1 = S_steady/dS/dt

....

In other words, the 20W/2.1x = 9.4W should give the maximum mode matching after 2037s of linear increase in defocus AND in the steady-state.


Images attached to this comment
paul.fulda@LIGO.ORG - 01:14, Tuesday 04 February 2014 (9777)

I modeled the 18MHz sideband buildup in the H1 PRMI as a function of ITMY Rc to see how it compared to the observations made recently. The attached plot shows POP 18MHz I and Q signals over ITMY Rc. The leftmost side of the plot is for the measured value of ITMY Rc from the nebula page, with no ITMY substrate lens, and the measured value of ITMX Rc from the nebula page with an -80km substrate lens. MICH was locked using REFL45Q and PRCL was locked using REFL45I. The POP demod phase was tuned to minimize Q-phase signal at the starting ITMY Rc value. The input carrier power in the model is 10W, the 9MHz modulation depth is 0.1, and the 45MHz modulation depth is 0.07. No optics after the PR2 transmission were included in the model.

As expected, the buildup increases as PRX and PRY become better matched. In the model, the buildup increases to a maximum of around a factor of 10 from the initial value. This is a much larger increase than was seen in the experiment. This could be because the model does not include clipping at the BS, which would increase as the beam sizes increase (see lower panel of the plot). Also, it is possible that ITMY has a non-thermal substrate lens (no measurement data is available for this), putting it closer to ITMX in the no-ring-heater state. Beyond the maximum, the PRMI quickly becomes unstable. This may explain the lock loss in the experiment past the maximum POP18 buildup (though many other things could too).

Non-image files attached to this comment