Displaying reports 1-20 of 88391.Go to page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 End
Reports until 18:00, Monday 13 July 2026
H1 SEI
anthony.sanchez@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:00, Monday 13 July 2026 (91015)
End station HEPI Pump Station Trip from Power Glitch

Ryan And I drove to EX and TJ drove to EY. 
Ryan and I turned off the HEPI VFD power supply then turned it Back on.
Then hit the reset button. 
The Pump then Whirled back to life !!! 
Then H1:HPI-PUMP_EX_PRESS_HIGH Flashed  Bright red for less than a second and the Interlock turned red and and the Whirling sound died.
Welp that didn't work.

We then ensured the setpoint:  H1:HPI-PUMP_EX_RMT_PRESS_PUMP_CTRL_INPUT was set to 70.
Tried it again with H1:HPI-PUMP_EX_RMT_PRESS_PUMP_CTRL_MODE set to manual. But we ramped H1:HPI-PUMP_EX_RMT_PRESS_PUMP_CTRL_OUTPUT_TWEAK_REQ too fast(?) and H1:HPI-PUMP_EX_DIFF_PRESS_PSI  went too high and the interlock tripped again.
...
Then we tried a bunch of attempts to manually increase H1:HPI-PUMP_EX_RMT_PRESS_PUMP_CTRL_OUTPUT to the value [2.29 V] that holds H1:HPI-PUMP_EX_DIFF_PRESS_PSI at 70 and Every time it would shoot well past 70 and trip the interlock again. 

We then opened up the control loop screen and noticed this integral term was set to 6. Which perhaps was too high.
So we hit the reset button.... H1:HPI-PUMP_EX_RMT_PRESS_PUMP_CTRL_ITERM_RESET_REQ....
Thankfully that reset the Integral Term down to 0..... 

We then tried again to turn it all back on manually, and keep the H1:HPI-PUMP_EX_DIFF_PRESS_PSI at 70 PSI. Once H1:HPI-PUMP_EX_DIFF_PRESS_PSI was stable at 70 PSI we then switched over to auto. Now this Tanks the Output voltage that we just set to 2.29  ..... all the way down to 0.0...... ok...... then back up..... ok..... then over shoots to the moon, Again Tripping the interlock and shutting it down..... again. 
We tried using different H1:HPI-PUMP_EX_RMT_PRESS_PUMP_CTRL_OUTPUT_TWEAK_SIZEs and otherwise tried to baby  poor lil HEPI  back into it's setpoints.... and it just wanted to FULL Send to the MOON!.

Then I had a weird thought... what if we set it too high? Will it go to 0? Will it go to negative Moon?! IDK but I wanted to find out. 

Really what I truly wanted was for H1:HPI-PUMP_EX_RMT_PRESS_PUMP_CTRL_ITERM to simply go to the 2.28 value that allows H1:HPI-PUMP_EX_RMT_PRESS_PUMP_CTRL_OUTPUT  to be 2.28 Volts which keeps the Diff pressure H1:HPI-PUMP_EX_DIFF_PRESS_PSI @ 70 PSI. But for some reason I cannot change that value Integral Value at all. Or atleast I couldn't directly....

So this is what I did: 
I set the output voltage a bit High....  such that the Differential pressure was just a lil too high. This is to convice the control loop to go down instead of Up. 
I then reset the Integral Term so it starts at zero when we switch it from manual mode to auto mode. 
Then I hit auto.... the Output voltage drops to 0 and comes back up.... but.... this time I'm ready! .....  I'm waiting to switch it back to Manual mode Right AFTER the output votage PASSES the output voltage that I want . This has now set both the Differential pressure, Output voltage, AND the Integral Value ABOVE  my desired destination. I let it settle a little high. THEN I clicked Auto again, which finally allowed the control loop to stablize at 70 PSI. 
We were on the phone with TJ at EY and that worked for EY as well.
Then we watched it for a bit and drove back to the corner station. 
Shoutout to Ryan S. and TJ for showing me the ropes and pointing things out that that helped me jump to my conclusions. 

TLDR: The Control loop overshoots when approaching from below. Approach it from above. It works for both End stations. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Images attached to this report
H1 SPI (SUS)
jennifer.wright@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:28, Monday 13 July 2026 (91014)
Mean LP filter for heterodyne meas seems fine

Item 1 on our commissioning for SPI is to figure out why we are not getting the same results for heterodyne efficiency in CDS as we did with an oscilloscope chamber side.

To evaluate the heterodyne measurement made by the measurement and reference interferometers we use the efficiency measurement of Vpp/(2*V_mean).

Ths is calculated by low passing the demodulated signal from each ifo in CDS and then multiplying by 2, befre dividing the demodulated signal by this mean. Shown in this photo here in the spi medm screens.

Jeff's firwst suspect was the low pass filter we use to get the mean demod signal.

The attached picture shows the raw demod signal on the left and the mean signal on the right. The mean for both looks roughly correct.

Jeff has put in a 4th order butterworth at 10Hz, see LHO alog #90638.

Images attached to this report
LHO VE (VE)
travis.sadecki@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:10, Monday 13 July 2026 (91011)
Corner station pumpdown paused for the night

The roughing scroll pumps were valved out and shut down for overnight.  Pressure in the corner was ~2 Torr at the break.

H1 TCS
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:05, Monday 13 July 2026 (91009)
Final Checks for CHETA laser Y-arm 0918
Dr Todd, Camilla
 
Polarizers
We put the S405C power meter after Polarizer1 and Matt adjusted the polarizer to maximize the power through. We then put the power meter after PowerMeterPickOff and adjusted Polarizer2 to maximize the power at the Waveplate setting for max power. Max power measured was 1.45W. Minimum power using waveplate ~30mW.
 
Thermal PD
Matt zero'ed this diode and we used the  S405C power meter to calibrate is to the power being injected after PowerMeterPickoff.
 
Final Checked on Fast PDs
We changed this to -2000ohm so the fast PDs report positive power. 
Checked beam was centered on both PDS by using PDPickoff and PDBeamsplitter. There isn't much flat plateau on these, meaning the beam is still larger than ideal on these diodes. Matt then adjusted Waveplate2 to get PDA and PDB powers equal. Using the S405C power meter, we measured 4.3mW before PD Lens. Adjusted Responsivity from 1.42 to 1.53 and splitter to 50% to show this. 
 
Beam Dumps
Double checked the beam was dumped after Polarizer 2 and the flipper. 
 
Power control
Matt filled in the calibration screen for power control. We still plan to edit and run Ryan Short's calibration script. 
 
Iris
Checked the beam was centered on the iris between M4 and M5. 
 
For sdfs see attached and 90992
Images attached to this report
H1 DAQ
jonathan.hanks@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:00, Monday 13 July 2026 (91010)
WP 13402 prep work, switches, fibers, and nds redirection

Dave, Tony, and Jonathan

Supporting WP 13402 we did some prep work.

* Reviewed the work plan.

* Added the new daqd switches to the DNS as sw-msr-daqd[0,1,2].

* Configured sw-msr-daqd0 and moved it to its final position.

* Reviewed the inventory of fiber, nics, and optics.

* Put a hostname override into puppet the workstations and display machines to point them towards h1daqnds0 so that tomorrow we can take h1daqnds1 down.

H1 SUS (SQZ, SUS)
rahul.kumar@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:36, Monday 13 July 2026 (91006)
HAM7 ZM5 (PSAMS) repair update - suspension taken out of chamber for PSAMS replacement work.

R Crouch, R Kumar

This morning we took out ZM5 suspension from HAM7 chamber for replacing the broken PSAMS unit. Before removing  ZM5 we marked the current position of it on the ISI table using a machinist square - see picture attached for reference.

We then placed ZM5 on the table near the chamber and carefully removed the bottom PSAMS units (after removing the mighty mouse cable) - see reference picture

The replacement PSAMS shipped to us from CIT and tested at LHO (see alog 91005) was then prepared for installation into ZM5 cage - see two pictures for reference.

Tomorrow (Tuesday), our plan is to insert the wires and suspend the entire chain, balance it before moving it back into HAM7. 

Images attached to this report
H1 SUS (SQZ, SUS)
rahul.kumar@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:18, Monday 13 July 2026 - last comment - 16:38, Monday 13 July 2026(91005)
HAM7 ZM5 (PSAMS) repair work status update - Inspection and in-chamber testing of replacement PSAMS (s/n 03) received from CIT.

R Crouch, R Kumar

CIT (Camille Makarem) shipped us a spare ZM5 PSAMS (s/n 03 with 72 in-lbs pre-load on the mirror for ROC 4.35m) for replacing the broken (strain gauge) PSAMS unit currently installed on ZM5 suspension in HAM7 chamber. We took the new unit out of the shipping container - see attachment01 attachment02 and attachment03 for reference. 

We inspected the optic housing and optic and found no issues with it, posting two pictures for reference - attachment04 and attachment05

This new unit was then plugged into the electronics chain of ZM5 PSAMS in HAM7 chamber (the suspension was pulled out of chamber and kept on a bench outside HAM7) - see attachment07 and attachment08 for reference.

At first we checked the strain gauge resistance and the results are as follows,

Pin 12 & 24 = 708 Ohms (looks good)

Pin 11 & 24 = 355.9 Ohms (looks good)

Next we varied the PZT voltage from 0 - 200V and measured the Strain Gauge (SG) voltage and the results are posted in the table below,

Voltage Calibrator Setting (Voltage)  PZT (Voltage) Strain Gauge (Voltage)
+10 0.5 2.642
+9 10.35 2.905
+8 20.32 3.095
+7 30.29 3.32
+6 40.27 3.60
+5 50.24 3.90
+4 60.72 4.08
+3 70.2 4.38
+2 80.1 4.65
+1 90.1 4.94
0 100.1 5.32
-1 110 6.32
-2 120 6.50
-3 130 6.69
-4 140 6.90
-5 149.8 7.11
-6 159.8 7.35
-7 169.7 7.58
-8 179.7 8.02
-9 189.6 8.17
-10 194.9 8.35

The above test tells us the this replacement unit is healthy and can be installed in ZM5 suspension for HAM7 work.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
rahul.kumar@LIGO.ORG - 16:38, Monday 13 July 2026 (91007)

reference - E2100371-v1 (Testing Procedure for PSAMS Strain Gauge Readout)

H1 SUS (ISC, SUS)
elenna.capote@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:58, Monday 13 July 2026 (91000)
Replacing/inventorying beamsplitter notches and bandstops

In preparation for locking with the new BBSS, I have taken an inventory of the beamsplitter filters to note where various notches and bandstops are located by suspension stage.

As a reminder, Oli copied over much of the BSFM filters into the BBSS model, 90154.

M1: none as far as I can tell

M2:

M3:

Ibrahim and Oli have measured the BBSS bounce and roll modes to be at 19.80 Hz and 32.09 Hz respectively, 90319.

I'm replacing the bounce and roll bandstops on M2 LOCK and OLDAMP to be centered around these frequencies.

Old foton design string for "NotBR_BS":

ellip("BandStop",4,1.5,40,17.7,17.9)ellip("BandStop",4,3,40,25.7,26.4)gain(1.6788)

New foton design string for "NotBR_BBS":

ellip("BandStop",4,1.5,40,19.7,19.9)ellip("BandStop",4,3,40,32,32.2)gain(1.6788)

 

As a final note, I'm not sure how necessary the BR bandstops are if we have dampers, so we could consider not having any on at all.
 

LHO General
ibrahim.abouelfettouh@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:03, Monday 13 July 2026 - last comment - 17:14, Monday 13 July 2026(91002)
OPS Day Shift Summary

TITLE: 07/13 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
INCOMING OPERATOR: None
SHIFT SUMMARY:

IFO is in IDLE for MAINTENANCE

Productive day in which:

Oli is taking over the remainder of this shift and will add comments if relevant.

LOG:

Start Time System Name Location Lazer_Haz Task Time End
14:57 VAC Jordan LVEA N Continuing Pumpdown 14:52
14:52 FAC Kim LVEA N Technical Cleaning 15:55
15:52 TCS Matt CHETA Lab Local Aligning 16:27
16:14 FAC Kim LVEA N Technical Cleaning 17:04
16:25 TCS Camilla CHETA Lab Local Aligning 16:27
16:29 SEI Shrey, Carlos, Miranda LVEA N Seismometer Checks 17:54
16:36 SUS Rahul LVEA N ZM5 Work HAM7 18:29
16:39 SUS Ryan C LVEA N ZM5 Work HAM7 18:24
16:57 EE Fil LVEA N HAM4 TCS Rack 18:29
17:12 OPS Ryan S LVEA N Laser Transition to Operations Safe 17:58
17:16 VAC Travis Ey N Parts 17:58
17:37 SUS Mitchell EX/EY N FAMIS Task 18:19
17:40 FAC Kim LVEA n Grabbing garb 17:52
17:53 FAC Kim EX n Tech clean 18:21
17:53 EE Marc LVEA N Whitening chassis change 18:45
18:01 VAC Travis LVEA n Troubleshooting pumps 18:29
18:06 TCS Matt Prep Lab y(local) CHETA work 19:23
18:07 SPI Jennie LVEA n Unshuttering SPI laser 18:10
18:16   Madi OpticsLab n Grabbing laptop 18:22
18:23 VAC Gerardo LVEA n Troubleshooting pump 18:29
18:24   RyanC LVEA n Grabbing phone 18:27
19:10 FAC Camilla, Tyler LVEA N Scaffolding tagging + camera cans -tyler out 19:16utc 19:21
19:50 EE Fil MSR N Cabling 21:47
20:15 VAC Gerardo LVEA N HAM1 Pump 22:15
20:16 SUS Ryan C LVEA N ZM5 Work HAM7 22:16
20:20 VAC Travis LVEA N HAM1 Pump 22:10
20:21 FAC Christina Optics, LVEA, MSR N Label Photos 21:32
20:30 PEM Shrey, Carlos, Miranda LVEA n Seismometers 22:30
20:36 SUS Rahul LVEA N ZM5 Work 22:36
20:58 FAC Richard LVEA N Checking on DM10 21:10
21:14 EE Marc LVEA n Reinstalling BBSS M1 satamp 21:31
21:47 SUS Betsy LVEA N HAM1 Pump 22:47
Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - 17:14, Monday 13 July 2026 (91012)

Power glitch at 22:31 UTC, tripping the HEPI pump controller and both ISI stages of ETMX and ETMY. Tony, RyanS, and TJ went down to the end stations and turned the pump controllers back on. Then I was able to bring HEPI and the ISIs back up.

Extra reservation system entries:

Start Time System Name Location Lazer_Haz Task Time End
22:44 SEI RyanS, Tony EX n Restarting HEPI controllers 23:48
22:49 SEI TJ EY n Restarting HEPI controllers 23:48
23:16 PEM Carlos, Miranda, Shrey LVEA n Seismometer work (Miranda back 23:37) 00:00
H1 SUS
marc.pirello@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:53, Monday 13 July 2026 (91003)
BBSS QOSEM Sat Amp Whitening Modifications Installed

WP13410

Replaced multiple signal path resistors to reduce gain and adjust the filter to match work done at Caltech linked here.

 

H1 OpsInfo (SPI)
jennifer.wright@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:20, Monday 13 July 2026 - last comment - 20:32, Monday 13 July 2026(90995)
SPI laser unshuttered

Jennie W

 

As per work permit #13412 the SPI laser has been unshuttered using the shutter controller on the floor behind the R4 electronics racks.

This is to monitor SPI alignment as the pumpdown continues and uses powers below 100 mW.

See photo showing the demodulated signals for the Rreference and Measurement SPI interferometers after the laser was unshuttered at 18:08:11 UTC.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jennifer.wright@LIGO.ORG - 12:26, Monday 13 July 2026 (90998)SEI, SPI

After consulting with Jim I set the guardian to take HAM2 and 3 to isolated at 19:23 UTC. They had been damped so this will change the HAM2-3 relative alignment a bit.

jennifer.wright@LIGO.ORG - 12:47, Monday 13 July 2026 (90999)

This caused HAM 3 tp trip so both ISIs have been taken to DAMPED.

Right ndscope is the QPD on HAM3, you can see the alignment changed massively when it tripped and then went back after both ISIs were taken to DAMPED.

Left ndscope shows the HAM2 QPD which doesn't have a big change between damped -> isolated -> damped.

Images attached to this comment
jennifer.wright@LIGO.ORG - 14:15, Monday 13 July 2026 (91001)

Here is the plot for the GS13s on HAM3 as it tripped.

Images attached to this comment
arnaud.pele@LIGO.ORG - 14:59, Monday 13 July 2026 (91004)

The RY blend filter was still set to the CRS damping path BLND7, so I changed it back to the nominal BLND4 path. Even after this change, the ISI was still ringing up.

Looks like the it's the Z loop that is unstable at 14.74Hz (see pictures). Having a good plant measurement will help retune the loop to avoid this ring up. If HAM3 needs to be isolated before then, the Z loop can be ran without the boost filter, which seem to be triggering the instability.

Images attached to this comment
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - 20:32, Monday 13 July 2026 (91016)

I think this ring up could be due to HEPI being locked on that chamber. I think this happened after the last vent as well. Could be that just adding a notch to the cps low pass will let us isolate the ISI. I will need a little bit of time to do some measurements.

H1 TCS
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:18, Monday 13 July 2026 (90992)
CHETA PDs

Matt, Camilla

We updated H1:AWC-ITMX_PD_{A,B}_TRANSIMPEDANCE and H1:AWC-ITMX_PD_{A,B}_RESPONSIVITY as per D2500105, as attached. 

Images attached to this report
H1 SEI
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:40, Tuesday 24 June 2025 - last comment - 11:39, Monday 13 July 2026(85300)
Comparing HAM1 ISI motion to HAM1 Passive stack TT L4Cs

I did a very quick search and didn't find any other posts, so I putting a plot here comparing the motion of the pre-vent HAM1 TT L4C passive stack motion to the current HAM1 ISI motion. ISI motion is generally 1-3 orders of magnitude better, only with a very narrow window at 15hz where the passive stack barely reached down to the ISI motion, but only for the x dof. Blue, green and brown are the ISI, cyan, pink and black are the passive stack.

Almost done with the st0 feedforward, X,Y,Z and RY are running. Still have to do tilt decoupling (which will improve low frequency motion), vac work at the chamber kept tripping the ISI during my measurements this morning.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jennifer.wright@LIGO.ORG - 11:39, Monday 13 July 2026 (90996)

Jim redid this measurement with data from 28/08/25 in order to get a good comparison for the Sep 2025 LVK. Posting here for continuity.

The old data was taken on 2025-03-30 at 22:57:46 UTC with 10 averages and a BW of 0.0468748 Hz.

The data post installing the ISI on HAM1 was taken on 2025-08-28 at 08:22:38 UTC with 10 averages and a BW of 0.0468748 Hz.

Non-image files attached to this comment
Displaying reports 1-20 of 88391.Go to page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 End