"It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife"
- Jane Austen, opening line of Pride and Prejudice
But unfortunately for both us and them, sometimes those men are winged termites in the Optics Lab.
As Elenna and I were cleaning up our work in the back optics table this afternoon, we noticed a few winged termites, and ended up finding maybe almost 10 in total walking around on the floor in the back area of the optics lab near the wall mounted cabinets between the two cleanrooms. We got rid of them but couldn't find where they had come from. I'm wondering if they're maybe coming from an opening under one of those cabinets? Last year this happened but those came out from under the flow benches along the wall - not sure if this is part of that same colony that survived or a different colony.
To summarize the ongoing issues from yesterday:
Keita and I have decided that swapping cables can possibly be done without removing the DCPDs. We're going to determine OMC A and OMC B based off of the PZT cable, and then swap the DCPD cables. We're waiting to hear the final verdict on the diode polarity to do pin adjustments and cable swapping.
In the meantime, Oli and I installed OMCB on the suspension and bolted it down using the OMC alignment template. We have placed the butterdishes over OMCA and B, but we haven't secured them yet with viton clamps while we continue to do work on the OMCs. The cables are only loosely clamped.
Next, Oli and I worked first contacting the remaining optics for BHSS- two HRs and one 50/50 splitter. The HRs were finished today, installed in their mounts, and placed randomly on the platform. The 50/50 splitter is still being FCed and should be ready in the morning. Once that optic is installed, we will proceed with the alignment of the OMCs and optics.
One vertical clamp is still missing from OMCB, but we should be able to install it once the helicoils and such arrive.
Sheila, Camilla.
We decided to pause on looking for the FC alignment and look at SQZ alignment into the IFO. To check our irises and possibly look for scattering shelves.
Locked SEED_DITHER with 75mW into fiber. Moved ZM3 to get OPO_IR PD up to max 0.9mW. Opened BeamDiv and after aligning SRM, mis-aligning SR2, could see beams on AS_A,B and C. AS_A and B had a similar size ~60 to reported before (e.g. 86965), but there was less power on AS_C: 4e-4 rather than the previous 7e-4.
We used Ryan's DRMI time from 89573 to put OM1, OM2 and SRM back. The with the SQZ SEED injected, we tried to use SQZ centering loops to center on AS_A and AS_B, this didn't work quite as expected. ZM4 kept saturating although these loops had worked Janaury 19th, before moves were done on the VOPO to help with clipping e.g. 88966.
Then went back to alignment on Jan 31st with 88976 with ZM1,2,3, 4,5,6 FC1. And took OM1,2,SRM to the January 19th positions. However here we saw no light on SQZT7 OPO IR PD, HAM7 WFs or in HAM6 on the AS_A,B,C diodes. This was done at 23:10 UTC. Comparisons of osems attached. The sliders to get these osems values are fairly different, see attached, so I also tried going to these slider values, that gave me some light on SQZT7 IR PD, HAM7 WFS and FCES with SEED injected, see attached. HAM6 AS diodes saw nothing.
TITLE: 03/25 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
INCOMING OPERATOR: None
SHIFT SUMMARY: GV7 is still broken and will not hard close, HAM1 vent prep work, the PSL incursion was completed, and the BHSS work continues in the Optics lab.
LOG:
| Start Time | System | Name | Location | Lazer_Haz | Task | Time End |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14:15 | FAC | Kim, Nellie | LVEA | N | Tech clean | 14:54 |
| 15:05 | VAC | Gerardo, Jordan | LVEA HAM1 | N | Open ION pump | 15:09 |
| 15:08 | FAC | Randy | LVEA WBay | N | Craning Test stand, *not over the tube* | 16:12 |
| 15:19 | SEI | Jeff | Optics lab | LOCAL | Turn off laser | 15:27 |
| 15:28 | SEI | Camilla, Jeff | Optics lab | N | Parts search / checks Camilla out 15:45 | 15:48 |
| 15:35 | SEI | Jeff, Camilla | LVEA | N | Grab power meter | 15:45 |
| 16:02 | TCS | Sophie | Prep lab | N | CHETA work | 16:19 |
| 16:08 | EE | Marc, Fil | LVEA H1,2 | N | Cabling fiber, SUS to SAFE | 18:58 |
| 16:19 | Betsy | CER/Clean storage, Optics lab | N | Put away garb and other stuff | 16:37 | |
| 16:20 | BHD | Elenna, Keita | Optics lab | N | BHD/BHSS work | 17:26 |
| 16:22 | SQZ | Camilla | LVEA, SQZT7 | LOCAL/HEIGHT | SQZT7 table alignment, bringing glasses for Fil, Marc | 16:33 |
| 16:33 | PSL/SPI | Jeff, Jason, Sina | PSL, Racks, PSL encl | N / LOCAL | SPI fiber work, Jason out 18:30 | 18:46 |
| 16:39 | FAC | Kim | LVEA | N | Tech clean | 18:09 |
| 16:46 | FAC | Randy | LVEA WBay | N | Test stand work | 17:39 |
| 16:48 | ISC | Ibrahim | CER/ Clean storage | N | Inventory C3 covers | 19:21 |
| 16:48 | SQZ | Camilla, Sheila | LVEA | LOCAL | SQZT7 work, LOCAL and HEIGHT LASER HAZARD | 17:04 |
| 16:59 | ISC | Jenne | LVEA | N | Talk to Camilla/Sheila | 17:02 |
| 17:06 | BHD | Oli | Optics lab | N | BHD/BHSS work | 17:40 |
| 17:17 | ISC | Jennie | Optics lab ->LVEA | N | Check for parts, put away in LVEA | 17:35 |
| 18:23 | SPI | Bram | LVEA | N | Check with Jeff out with Jeff | 19:11 |
| 18:35 | VAC | Travis | Site | N | VAC property inventory | 21:53 |
| 18:37 | VAC | Gerardo | LVEA | N | Turn on purge air for HAM1 | 19:13 |
| 18:39 | OPS | Betsy, Tony | LVEA | N | Double checking LASER SAFE status | 19:11 |
| 19:17 | OPS | Tony | LVEA | N | Grab paper and table keys | 19:22 |
| 19:29 | FAC | Randy, Jim | LVEA | N | Turn on HAM1 CR and work on the test stand Jim out 20:20 | 20:27 |
| 19:34 | ICS | Camilla, Calum | Optics lab | N | Check on parts | 19:52 |
| 20:09 | SEI | Jeff, Bram, Sina | Optics lab | LOCAL | SPI work | Ongoing |
| 20:18 | TCS | Sophie | Prep lab | N | CHETA work | 21:03 |
| 20:21 | SUS | Oli | LVEA | N | Take picture of a rack | 20:25 |
| 20:32 | BHD | Elenna | Optics lab | LOCAL | BHSS work | Ongoing |
| 20:34 | PEM | RyanC | CER | N | Swap dm comms cables | 20:41 |
| 20:37 | SUS | Oli | Optics Lab | LOCAL | Working BHSS system | Ongoing |
| 20:40 | SQZ | Sheila | SQZT7 | N | Checking for people working at height to transition. | 21:02 |
| 20:41 | EE | Fill | CER | n | Grounding cables | Ongoing |
| 20:51 | VAC | Gerardo | LVEA | N | Take off turbopump | 21:02 |
| 21:01 | EE | Betsy, Marc, Tony | Vac Prep | N | Cable testing | Ongoing |
| 21:49 | OPS | Ibrahim | CER / Clean storage | N | C3 cloth covers checks | 22:18 |
| 22:35 | Calum | Vac Prep lab | N | Talk to Betsy | 23:20 | |
| 22:58 | VAC | Jordan | LVEA | N | Grab parts by HAM1 | 23:03 |
J. Kissel, M. Pirello While in SUS-R2 and thinking SPI, and looking at the proposed rack layout from G2401479, and accounting for all the SUS (BBSS, LO1, LO2) that's incoming for O5 -- I found that SPI can have a bit more space if we just move the SUS-PR3 optical lever whitening chassis up 5 U-heights from "32" to "27." I put the u-height in quotes because this is an old style rack with the u-heights labeled from top down, rather than the bottom up per industry convention. I would have and could have gone higher, but the 27 slot already had mounting clips in it, so I went there. We can go as high as "25" if need be in the future. Pics of before vs. after are attached.
F. Clara, J. Kissel, S. Koehlenbeck, J. Oberling, M. Pirello D2400110 Today we picked up where we left off with the install of SPI into H1. Where we last left things, we'd installed a new SPI pick-off of ALS/SQZ beam in Apr 2025 (see ECR E2400083 and results in LHO aLOGs 83989, 83996, 83978). Back then, we had ended the work with the input to the fiber collimator within the PSL dumped. With Jason and Sina in the PSL, we confirmed that the SPI path was still blocked. However, we also realized/remembered/confirmed that the entire ALS/SQZ/SPI path had 25% less power -- We've been running the PSL at lower power allocation downstream of the PMC since Sep 2025 to prevent issues we'd found with the currently installed EOM after a power outage triggered a dust monitor to spew out dust into the PSL (see that saga in e.g. LHO:87109 LHO:86966). They found the power at the SPI pick-off was 140 [mW] instead of the 188 [mW] we left in Apr 2025 (see LHO:83996). (Using labels in the half-up-to-date drawing D1300348) Jason and Sina rotated ALS-HWP2 upstream of ALSPBS01 to restore the nominal 50 [mW] into the ALS/SQZ pick-off and ~200 [mW] (190 [mW] measured). This means there's ~50 [mW] less out to ALS / ISCT1 than before today. Then with the SPI pickoff still dumped, we installed a 30 [m] patch cord*** from the PSL optical table, out the mouse hole between the +X wall of the PSL enclosure and HAM1, then up running along the upper racks to waterfall down at SUS-H2. The fiber sits within the typical orange tubing. Per D2400110, this is SPI_PSL_001, and it's labeled as such on both ends. After install, I connected the SUS-R2 end to a Thorlabs S121C power meter with S120-APC2 fiber adapter. With this installed (making the system laser safe at SUS-R2 end), Jason/Sina unblocked the SPI pickoff input. With 190 [mW] in, we measure 187 [mW] out on the other end. 98% transmission, pretty excellent. Almost unbelievably excellent but we weren't rigorous with our uncertainty and systematics. Happy with this result, we then blocked the SPI path again, and re-capped the SUS-R2 end for final dressing in the racks. We'll unblock again when we're read to connect it to the Laser Prep Chassis. ***Patch cord details: Manufacturer DIAMOND DIAMOND Part Number: ENS/1094388 Customer Part Number: 9711228 Patchcord SM L=30 PM 2xFC 2mm APC (i.e. 2mm narrow key FC/APC on both ends) tran 6,6/125/245 PAND 980nm
During the last two days CDS EE has completed the following:
This completes dirty work over HAM1 and HAM2. In the next two weeks, will close out work in SUS-R2 before HAM3 is vented.
List of items needed for SUS-R2:
F. Clara, J. Kissel, J. Oberling, M. Pirello, T. Sanchez, and R. Thompson
S. Muusse, C. Compton
0920 QCL unit failure summary:
We were beam profiling the laser and I had the profiler ~8” from the laser head, with a steering mirror to steer onto the scanner. Laser was at 1A. I blocked and unblocked the beam but as it was unblocked there was a beep and there laser controller turned off with message “LD output voltage protection was tripped”.
I then turned controller off and back on again with power down to 0.5A and it would not turn on.
Camilla then came into the lab, we turned off and unplugged controller. It was turned on again, would not turn on. Remembering LLO's issues, on the Temperature Protection screen we eased the +-5 deg requirement to +-6. Laser then appeared to turn on with “laser current reading 0.500 A” and “laser voltage reading 10.440V”, temperature 25deg. However no beam was coming from the laser.
We then turned off and on laser. Again appeared on but no beam, slowly turned up current from 0.5A towards 1A, at 0.84A controller beeped with “LD output voltage protection was tripped” message again.
QCL Unit q-parameter dependance on laser temperature:
Unit failure happened while profiling the laser to check if the q-parameter of the QCL has a temperature dependence. This profiling was done largely at a 23mm offset with one point near the waist. However, there was not an opportunity to take more measurements around the waist in this new data because of the failure which may cause some inaccuracies in the fitted q. I used a non linear fit where M2=1. This is consistent with the fitting by Matt. His measurements were completed at 20 deg but after advisement from thorlabs we have increased operating temperature to 25 deg.
| Temperate [deg] /date | Horizontal [mm] | Vertical [mm] |
| 20 / 2025-09 | - 174 + 67i | - 209 + 56i |
| 25 / 2026-03-24 |
-129 ± 6 + 71 ± 2i |
-155 ± 6 + 59 ± 2i |
With the new q factors there is slightly better agreement between the fitted q-parameter for L2 and the model.
Vertical
| Measurement/model | w0 [ µm] | z [mm] | w at ITM [mm] |
|
Fit from data: |
978.9±22.7 |
-1063.1±33.8 |
50.09 |
| Fintrace q: - 209 + 56i (old) |
857.11 |
-500.64 | 61.38 |
| Fintrace q: -155 + 59i |
992.56 |
671.38 |
54.083 |
Horizontal
| Measurement/model | w0 [ µm] | z [mm] | w at ITM [mm] |
| Fit from data | 1280.3+/-54.9 |
-1813.3±83.5 |
38.01 |
| Fintrace q:- 174 + 67i (old) |
979.42 |
-653.71 | 54.38 |
| Fintrace q: -129 + 71i |
1127.3 |
-866 |
47.939 |
Wed Mar 25 10:11:55 2026 INFO: Fill completed in 11min 52secs
Sheila, Camilla
While we had good green (20) and IR (1) FC flashes, we had to move 100urad in ZM3 positive PIT to get any light on SQZT7 OPO IR PD, see -2h30 on screenshot.
We then walked ZM1 and ZM2 both in negative PIT (which seems a bit weird but worked) until we only had to move ZM3 13urad to get light on SQZT7. However in doing this move, we lost the majority of IR light and some green light, see t-cursor #1 of screenshot. I injected the SEED beam at this point and the IR FC camera looked again like a strange cross or swallow bird. I hoped to move ZM3, FC1 and FC2 to bring back IR light but wasn't able to.
I was able to get good green flashes simultaneously with SQAT7 IR light but then I had no IR FC light, see t-cursor #3 of screenshot, 22:35UTC.
Vicky reminded us of 2022 when we had to pico to get FC green/IR co-resonance: 66017, 66281
Sheila, Jenne, Camilla
Today Sheila and I went onto SQZT7 to try to align the FC green REFL beam onto the diode so we could lock the FC in green. Could see on the periscope that the FCGS REFL beam was clipped. Sheila remembers it was not clipped last week before she pico'ed the green beam so we Jenne and I went back to where we had good IR and green FC flashes and undid Friday's 89596 pico-ing. This made the green yaw beam look much worse and flashes decrease as expected.
I then went back to here we had green FC flashes with IR on SQZT7 and repeated when we did yesterday but with YAW, moving ZM1 and bringing flashes back with ZM2 in the direction to de crease the amount ZM3 needed to move to get light back on SQZT7. I did completely loose the FC IR beam doing this though in going to the green FC flashes with IR on SQZT7 place.
TITLE: 03/25 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
OUTGOING OPERATOR: None
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
SEI_ENV state: CALM
Wind: 5mph Gusts, 2mph 3min avg
Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.23 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
The JAC seems to be failing to lock. I'm not sure why, but since it's just scanning I assume it's fine for the night. But, if someone with more JAC experience thinks it's useful to log in and set it to DOWN for the night, that would be good.
After talking to Keita, I set the JAC to Down.
Betsy reminded me that the IOT table was unplugged in prep for venting, and that's why JAC was failing to lock.
(Travis S., Jordan V., Richard M., Gerardo M.)
Last Friday we tried to "hard close" GV7, but we only achieved a "soft close" status. After looking at the system that uses instrument air at the gate valve, we did noticed that the solenoid valve to "open" and "close" the gate valve was "leaking" air, lots of instrument air, to fix the air leak we decided to replace the solenoid valve with a new one.
Then when it was time to "hard close" GV7, its pressure regulator broke, we were not able to open the regulator. We ordered a couple of new regulators and should be here on Wednesday. Meanwhile we are going to "hard close" the gate valve using a bottle of nitrogen.
Attached is a photo of the broken regulator, yes the knob is off, but the metal piece within is free floating and not able to do its job.
(Travis S., Jordan V., Richard M., Gerardo M.)
We bypassed the gate valve instrument air regulator and feed bottled air to the gate valve actuation system directly. We continued where we left off, and just continued to apply pressure to the system in an attempt to "hard close" the gate valve, and a second approach was to open the gate valve and close it again.
Leaky sound noted, we did noticed that when we are on the "close" setting, there is lots of hissing sound coming from one of the "relief ports" at the solenoid valve, but when we are on the "open" setting, there is no hissing at the solenoid valve. And if there is is very small.
We previously reported that the wiring to ground on the OMCA DCPD dsub9 cables seemed odd, see 89562. There appears to be two conflicting diagrams of the pin wiring, D2200276 and D2300119. Neither of these diagrams follow the correct pin naming practice either.
Today, Oli and I checked the ground connectivity for the OMCB DCPD dsub9. The case ground is wired to what is labeled pins 6 and 9, according to both of the diagrams above and also proper convention. However, this is different from OMCA, where the case ground is wired to pins 2 and 5 (following the incorrect naming of the diagrams above), or pins 1 and 4 (following correct naming conventions).
So either way, we have two different wiring set ups for OMCA and OMCB. We have only checked the ground pins so far, and it seems like we should confirm the cathode and anode wiring as well.
To summarize:
- we have two different diagrams for pin wiring
- OMCA and OMCB are wired differently from each other
- the diagrams are not following proper pin naming convention which is making this more confusing
Two problems with the drawings.
1. Case grounding.
As for cable and connection drawings, D2200276-v4 wiring diagram specifies that pin1-2 and pin4-5 twisted pairs carry the photocurrent, pin1 and pin4 being cathode, and case grounds are routed to pin6 and pin9, between DCPDs and the in-vac DCPD frontend. See the 1st attachment.
D2300118 DCPD to DB9M cable doesn't agree with the wiring diagram, it routs the case grounds to pin 2 and pin 5. See the 2nd attachment.
D1300369 DB9F-DB9F cable drawing agrees with the wiring diagram in that pin1-2 and pin4-5 are twisted pairs.
D2000592-v3 in-vac DCPD frontend seems to be compatible with the wiring diagram in that it routs the pin6 and 9 to the ground.
So, D2300118 DCPD to DB9M cable drawing is singularly incompatible with others.
Below is a summary table of the above together with reality check of the DCPD-DB9m cable. It seems that there's no way OMCA cable works. Anode/Cathode check wasn't performed (yet).
| pin1 | pin2 | pin6 | pin4 | pin5 | pin9 | |
| D2200276-v4 wiring diagram | Cathode1 | Anode1 | Case1 | Cathode2 | Anode2 | Case2 |
| D2300118 DCPD to DB9M cable | Cathode1 | Case1 | Anode1 | Cathode2 | Case2 | Anode2 |
| D1300369 DB9F-DB9F cable (pass through) | compatible with the wiring diagram in that pin1-2 and pin4-5 are twisted pairs. | |||||
| D2000592-v3 in-vac DCPD frontend (outside of the enclosure feedthrough) |
Internally routed to PD1 pin1 |
Internally routed to PD1 pin2 |
Internally routed to GND |
Internally routed to PD2 pin1 |
Internally routed to PD2 pin2 |
Internally routed to GND |
| OMCA reality | Case | ? | ? | Case | ? | ? |
| OMCB reality | ? | ? | Case | ? | ? | Case |
2. Polarity of the diode seems to be wrong.
Assuming that the wiring diagram and the in-vac DCPD frontend circuit diagram are both correct, cathode1 and anode1 are routed to "PD1 pin1" and "PD1 pin2" while cathode2 and anode2 are routed to "PD2 pin1" and "PD2 pin2". So, pin1 and pin2 inside the frontend chassis are cathode and anode. Again look at the first attachment.
However, whey you look at the circuit diagram of the frontend (3rd attachment), pin2 is connected to the positive bias and pin1 is grounded (via the huge inductor). This means that the PD is forward-biased and will be unusable. Is this only in the drawings?
What to do.
First thing is to check the diode polarity in reality, i.e. if cathode is routed to pin 1 and 4 (which I expect) or to pin 2 and 5 (which I don't expect). In parallel, check with Ali/Dean that my assessment of the polarity makes sense or not.
Depending on the results of the polarity investigation, we'll determine which cable needs to be reterminated how. If we're lucky we'll just reterminate only one cable, but if the PD polarity is indeed wrong we'll have to reterminate all cables.
Here is a further update. This is based on conversations with Keita and Betsy, and emails to and from CIT and LLO.
At first, it appears one issue here is that I have made a mistake OMC placement, as D2200276 indicates that OMCB should have the DCPD cable labeled D2300119 (and PZT cable D2300121), and OMCA should have D2300118 (and PZT cable D2300120), and I installed them opposite according to the DCPD cables. This doesn't account for the wiring issue; it would only make a cable length difference.
Oli and I went into the lab to swap around OMCA and OMCB, and realized that one OMC has the DCPD cable for A (D2300118) and PZT cable for B (D2300121) and vice versa. So it's not clear which is which.
Keita has further pointed out that this wiring issue with the grounding pins could indicate cathode and anode are swapped, which means that the diode will be forward biased, which is a much bigger issue.
Therefore, we're pausing on all BHSS work for now until we can figure out how to resolve these problems.
LLO has not checked their wiring, but Oli and I did note that they paid attention to the OMC labeling since they knew the cable lengths would be different.
When our OMCs were shipped to us, the ameristat wrapping had OMC A and OMC B labels, but once we took the wrapping off, there was no indication of A and B on the boxes.
Keita, Elenna, and I just went in and tested the direction the current is flowing for the DCPD cables (D2300118 and D2300119).
D2300118 (SN S2500546)
Current direction:
- Pin 2 -> 1
- Pin 5 -> 4
D2300119 (SN S2500548)
Current direction:
- Pin 6 -> 1
- Pin 9 -> 4
We verified that there was no current flow when probes were swapped
Hepi Pump Trends (Monthly) Famis 39954:
On Jan 26th the HPI-PUMP_EX_PRESS1_PSI started rising in maximum pressure. and on maybe feb 2nd it started getting worse. Seems like it has plateau-ed on Feb 16th, but the Pressure still remains elevated.
That channel back in Oct was between 92.4-92.6 PSI.
And now it's between 91.9 - 93.5 PSI. I'm not sure if this is out of bounds for HEPI.
I have looked at the EX pressures a bit and I suspect that one of the pressure sensors on the EX manifold has gone bad.
On the attached trend, the top 2 traces are PRESS1 and PRESS2, bottom 2 traces are the same pressures at EY. EX PRESS1 starts seeing bigger peak to peak signal starting about 50 days ago, but PRESS2 doesn't see this increase in pressure noise. Second attach image is a zoomed in trend of the same channels. EX PRESS1 seems to have some kind of 1hz oscillation. PRESS2 might be seeing some of this same signal, but not to the same extent. The supply pressure to the VEA at EX definitely doesn't see this 1hz signal, so I think it's either not real or it's being filtered out at the manifold.
I have yet to go down to EX and test this, but I will try to do so this week.
FRS ticket: https://services1.ligo-la.caltech.edu/FRS/show_bug.cgi?id=37356