Displaying reports 1-20 of 87472.Go to page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 End
Reports until 17:31, Tuesday 28 April 2026
H1 DAQ
jonathan.hanks@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:31, Tuesday 28 April 2026 (90047)
WP 12469 updated the experimental framewriter

I updated and restarted the experimental framewriter on h1daqfw2 today around 2:20pm localtime today.  This was to verify some new code still produced identical frames.

H1 CDS
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:46, Tuesday 28 April 2026 - last comment - 16:48, Tuesday 28 April 2026(90043)
h1suslo12 model now temporarily running as the BBSS model alongside the original (but slightly modified) BSFM h1susbs model

WP13213 Jeff, Tom, Oli, Dave:

h1susbs (the original BSFM model) was changed slightly to no longer drive the 2nd LIGO-DAC chans 08-11. This frees these up for use by the BBSS model. At the same time 4 IPC senders and 11 IPC receivers were removed.

Instead of replacing h1suslo12 with a brand new h1susbbss model, with all the associated RGC/DAQ/puppet changes, we chose to keep the h1suslo12 model essentially in name only, but change its function to drive the BBSS and test QOSEMS.

To do this, Oli changed the h1susbbss.mdl file to:

 - use h1suslo12's dcuid=188

 - remove all IPC senders

 - reduce the number of DAC channels, only using those freed up by the h1susbs changes

This approach means the H1.ipc and testpoint.par files are unchanged. The H1SUSLO12.txt filterfile and safe.snap files are substantially changed, but these had not been commissioned. The H1SUSLO12.ini file was also essentially rewritten for BBSS with the exception of some FEC channels.

There were no issues with rebuilding and installing the new h1susbs and h1suslo12 models. The old versions were stopped before the new ones were started because we are swapping DAC drives between these models.

DAQ Restart

The DAQ was restarted for the model changes. There were no issues found.

CDS Overview

The h1suslo12 entry on the CDS Overview has a new color/label to denote its current usage as the BBSS model. Also note the removal of some IPC senders from h1susbs means we have continuous IPC receive errors on the h1susmc2 and h1seiproc models.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - 16:31, Tuesday 28 April 2026 (90044)

Summary of h1susbs DAQ changes:

Total number of DAQ changes = 48
(0 additions, 48 deletions)
 
IPC: 11 Removed Receivers:
     H1:FEC-31_IPC_ASC_BS_PIT_SUSBS
     H1:FEC-31_IPC_ASC_BS_YAW_SUSBS
     H1:FEC-31_IPC_ASC_SUS_BS_PIT_DITHER
     H1:FEC-31_IPC_ASC_SUS_BS_YAW_DITHER
     H1:FEC-31_IPC_ISI_BS_SUSPOINT_BS_L_OUT_IPC
     H1:FEC-31_IPC_ISI_BS_SUSPOINT_BS_P_OUT_IPC
     H1:FEC-31_IPC_LSC_BS_L_SUSBS
     H1:FEC-31_IPC_LSC_TRIG_IFO_PCIE
     H1:FEC-31_IPC_SUS_MC2_2_BS_M1_BIO
     H1:FEC-31_IPC_SUS_MC2_2_BS_M2_BIO
     H1:FEC-31_IPC_SUS_MC2_2_BS_M3_BIO


IPC: 4 Removed Senders
     H1:FEC-31_IPC_SUS_BS_2_MC2_M1_BIO NOTE: receiver in model(s) ['h1susmc2']
     H1:FEC-31_IPC_SUS_BS_2_MC2_M2_BIO NOTE: receiver in model(s) ['h1susmc2']
     H1:FEC-31_IPC_SUS_BS_2_MC2_M3_BIO NOTE: receiver in model(s) ['h1susmc2']
     H1:FEC-31_IPC_SUS_BS_M1_LOCK_L NOTE: receiver in model(s) ['h1seiproc']
 

david.barker@LIGO.ORG - 16:32, Tuesday 28 April 2026 (90045)

Summary of h1suslo12 DAQ changes (now BBSS):

Total number of DAQ changes = 4510
(2932 additions, 1578 deletions)

No IPC changes

david.barker@LIGO.ORG - 16:48, Tuesday 28 April 2026 (90046)

Tue28Apr2026
LOC TIME HOSTNAME     MODEL/REBOOT
15:05:36 h1susb2h34   h1susbs     <<< reduced BSFM model
15:06:02 h1susb2h34   h1suslo12   <<< repurposed as BBSS model


15:13:55 h1daqgds0    [DAQ] <<< 0-leg for model changes
15:14:02 h1daqfw0     [DAQ]
15:14:02 h1daqtw0     [DAQ]
15:14:03 h1daqnds0    [DAQ]
15:16:57 h1daqdc1     [DAQ] << 1leg restart
15:17:07 h1daqfw1     [DAQ]
15:17:08 h1daqtw1     [DAQ]
15:17:10 h1daqnds1    [DAQ]
15:17:18 h1daqgds1    [DAQ]
15:17:44 h1daqgds1    [DAQ] <<< gds1 needed a restart
 

H1 General
anthony.sanchez@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:35, Tuesday 28 April 2026 (90032)
Maintenance Tuesday Report

TITLE: 04/28 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
INCOMING OPERATOR: None
SHIFT SUMMARY:

Test T634314 @ 16:00:30 UTC

Firepump1 is on 16:30:23
FirePump2 on 16:31:20 UTC
Eric confirms that Firepumps are done being used at 16:35 UTC

Vacuum Alarm for PT120B pressure torr started alarming @ 16:42 UTC, likely due to Fil pulling cables.

Dust monitors for LVEA 10 (Which I beleive is the dust mon in the BSC2 area.)
 

Test Frame Writer2 was restarted without incident. 


HEPI Pump pressure diag main. Jim says he'd like this to become a Diag Main flag that gets raised when the following channels are more that 5% off from each other.:  
H1:HPI-PUMP_L0_PS1_PRESS1
H1:HPI-PUMP_L0_PS2_PRESS1
H1:HPI-PUMP_L0_PS3_PRESS1
H1:HPI-PUMP_L0_PS4_PRESS1

MC2 and PR2 were taken to safe while betsy and Travis work in HAM3.

DC0 & FW restarts for new SPI front end models  at 22:13 UTC.

LOG:

 

Start Time System Name Location Lazer_Haz Task Time End
14:40 FAC Kim LVEA N Technical Cleaning & Supplies. 15:56
14:54 FAC Tyler & Betsy LVEA N talking with Kim 14:59
15:19 SUS Rahul HAM3 LVEA Installing baffles. 19:29
15:20 FAC Randy LVEA N Helping Betsy 15:39
15:31 FAC Chris LVEA HAM7 N Checking traps. 15:55
15:38 SUS Mitchell LVEA HAM3 N Helping Rahul with Baffles 19:25
15:41 PEM Ryan LVEA N HAM3 Dust monitor 15:48
15:42 Safety Richard & Gerardo LVEA N Talking to Betsy, Gerardo still in. 16:24
15:53 FAC Chris MY,EY,MX,EX,FCES N Famis checks. 16:42
16:04 EE Fil LVEA N Pulling cables to the Test stand 19:19
16:10 Tour Jeff & Adrian LVEA n Touring the LVEA 16:51
16:24 Cheta Camilla Optics Lab N Checking for parts 16:48
16:25 VAC Gerardo LVEA N Moving the bang Blocks. 17:38
16:26 FAC Randy LVEA N Chatting with Betsy 17:16
16:27 FAC Tyler LVEA Highbay N Moving the MeatLocker. 19:12
16:32 FAC Kim LVEA N Techincal cleaning & Re-Suppling 17:26
16:46 VAC Travis LVEA N Checking on HAM3 Feed throughs. 17:30
16:48 VAC Jordan LVEA N Checking CP1 RGA tree 17:18
17:30 VAC Travis MX N Measurements on Cryopump 17:54
18:08 EPO Cassidy & Youth Tour Over pass N Leading a tour for the Youth. 19:08
18:09 Controls Jeff, Tom, Oli LVEA n Looking for Fil 18:49
18:14 Bets Betsy LVEA N Counting Cereal numbers. 19:20
18:21 SEI Jim LVEA IY N Reconnecting a cable that was accidentally disconnected. 19:02
18:42 EPO Maggie Over pass N Leading a Youth tour. 19:27
18:52 SPI Jeff LVEA HAM6 n 5 minute scavenger hunt for parts. 18:54
19:01 IAS Jason & Ryan LVEA N Faroing 19:01
19:44 SEI Jim Mech Mezz N Recovering the HEPI Pumps. 20:15
20:09 SEI Jim LVEA N Revalving BSC2 HEPI 21:34
20:18 IAS Jason & Ryan C LVEA N Faro Surveying 23:48
20:22 BHSS Keita & Elenna Optics Lab n working on Manta ray. 22:09
20:23 FAC Randy LVEA mega Cleanroom N adding unistrut! 21:24
20:59 VAC Travis & Betsy LVEA HAM3 N feedThrough work in HAM3 22:59
21:11 EE Marc CER N Installing SUS chassis 21:20
21:28 IAS Sheila & Adrian LVEA n Faro Surveying 22:30
23:06 VAC Gerado LVEA West bay N Poking the "Super Sucker 500" 23:26
23:21 VAC Jordan LVEA WestBay N to help Gerardo with uh.... device mentioned 23:26
Images attached to this report
LHO VE
travis.sadecki@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:12, Tuesday 28 April 2026 (90042)
HAM3 D3 feedthru swapped

The D3 feedthru on HAM3 was swapped from the 3-port version with 3x Dual DB25 feedthrus to the single piece 12x DB25 connector feedthru.  We re-attached the in-vac cables that were originally in that port and Betsy re-attached the in-air cables so that the SUSes can be controlled overnight. 

H1 ISC (INS, ISC, SYS)
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:50, Tuesday 28 April 2026 - last comment - 15:50, Tuesday 28 April 2026(90039)
OMC QPD sense pin problem: Solved

Summary:

The problem of "Sense" pin of OMCA QPD1 short-circuited to the BHDS structure (alog 90029 from yesterday) was tracked down to the free "sense" wire inside the QPD enclosure touching the aluminum part inside the enclosure. We solved the problem by trimming the wire short.

Merely opening the QPD enclosure broke the short circuit temporarily:

We lifted the OMCA QPD1 from the BHDS while QPD2 is still attached to the BHDS and confirmed that the sense pin for the QPD1 is conductive to the QPD1 enclosure but not to the BHDS. As soon as we opened the back of the QPD1 enclosure, the short-circuit to the enclosure was broken. 

It seemed that the free part of the sense wire was a bit too long and bowed in the enclosure, allowing the tip of that wire to touch the inside wall of the enclosure itself (see Elenna's first image in her comments).

Cutting the sense wire short broke the short circuit permanently:

I cut the wire short such that it cannot touch the enclosure (Elenna's second picture), reassembled the enclosure and confirmed that there's no short circuit between the sense pin and anything else. 

Repeating the tests:

We put the QPD1 back on the BHDS and connected the cable to the transimpedance amplifier. On the oscilloscope, it was immediately apparent that the terrible 60Hz noise (which was 6.5V p-p) was gone (Elenna's 3rd picture).

We repeated the flashlight test, all segments responded with O(1)mV negative voltage (i.e. positive output minus negative output from the TIA amplifier was negative few mV maximum) while the dark offset was O(0.1mV).

We also measured the dark noise. It seems that all measurements for both QPD1 and QPD2 were limited by the noise of the TIA. Low frequency noise especially 60Hz and its harmonics varied from channel to channel, but in all cases it seemed that there's very little difference between the noise measured with QPD connected VS the noise without QPD. As such, I'll just show here a few examples. First attachment is the QPD1 segment 1 noise with the QPD attached, the second is the same thing but without QPD connected to the front panel of the TIA. They look identical. The third one is the QPD1 segment 4 (with QPD attached, not much different without QPD). The fourth one is the QPD2 segment 3 (with QPD attached, not much different without QPD).

There's no reason to suspect that QPD1 for OMCA is broken (nor QPD2).

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
elenna.capote@LIGO.ORG - 15:27, Tuesday 28 April 2026 (90040)

Here are photos of the QPD housing with the back removed. You can see a long unsoldered wire that we identified as the "sense" wire with conducitivity tests. This is pointed out with the pink arrow. You can also see an extra mystery wire pointed out by the blue arrow. We don't know what that wire is attached to. The wire pointed by the blue arrow is actually the shielding wire which is connected to pin 1.

The after photo shows the sense wire after Keita clipped it short, pointed out with a pink arrow.

I have also included a photo of the oscilloscope image of segment 1 of both OMCA QPDs.

Images attached to this comment
H1 SUS
marc.pirello@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:44, Tuesday 28 April 2026 (90041)
Removed, Tested, and Reinstalled the two 8 Channel Satellite Amps in SUS-R2

We pulled, tested, and reinstalled the two 8 channel satellite amplifiers in SUS-R2.

S1106058, S1200173.

H1 SEI
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:50, Tuesday 28 April 2026 (90038)
1 of 4 HEPI Corner station pumps have been off since Dec 14 2025 power outage, remaining 3 pumpstations were running at ~95% to cover since

Last week I tripped the HEPI pump controller valving out the BSC2 actuators, it took me until today to try to recover it. In the process of investigating this I found that one of the 4 corner station HEPI pump carts has been more or less off since a power outage in December. The remaining pump stations have been running at about 95% drive to cover for the lost cart. I am working on some revisions to the famis and asking to Tony to add a verbal notification if there is a mismatch in the manifold pressures for the 4 corner pump stations.

Nice to know that we have overhead to lose one pump station and still supply the corner HEPI with pressure. Drive is much lower now that all 4 are running again.

Attached image shows how long we have been running with only 3 pumps. Crosshair in the upper left plot shows approximate time of the power outage. Bottom right shows we have been running at ~1900 cts drive out of 2048 total available since then. We are back around 1100 cts drive now.

Images attached to this report
H1 SUS
rahul.kumar@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:22, Tuesday 28 April 2026 - last comment - 14:27, Tuesday 28 April 2026(90035)
HAM3 chamber vent work - SLiC, BAFFLE ASSY attached to both PR2 and MC2

Mitchell, Rahul

This morning we entered HAM3 chamber and attached the baffles (for stray light control) to both PR2 (HSTS) and MC2 (HSTS) suspensions. The baffle assembly design is shown D1700257_V5. These baffles were attached (directly mounted on the HSTS structure) on both the sides of the optic, i.e  HR and AR side.

Before attaching the baffles I inspected both the optics and they looked nice and clean, hence didn't needed any First Contact cleaning. 

I am attaching pictures below for reference.

We found that both PR2 and MC2 had two missing 1/4-20 threads on the HR side for attaching the mounting rail (D1700249_v1) of the baffle (Mitchell will attach a picture showing the same). Typically, these rail need four holes on the structure for securing them. However, we used the lower two threaded holes for attaching these mounting rail and they were rigidly secured. On the DCC I found that both PR2 and MC2 have D020023_V3 of the HSTS_Structural Weldment Assembly, latest D020023_V7 has more holes on the frame.

We also noted that one of the Siskiyou mount is very close to the MC2 baffle (AR side) as shown in the picture here. However, I can confirm that they are not touching and there is a decent amount of clearance between them. 

I still need to perform health checks on both the suspensions to rule out any rubbing and will post the results as a comment over here.

Note - counts on dust monitor were in single digit before and after entering/exiting the chamber (Thanks to Ryan C for arranging this). 

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
rahul.kumar@LIGO.ORG - 14:25, Tuesday 28 April 2026 (90036)

WP13211 closed. 

mitchell.robinson@LIGO.ORG - 14:27, Tuesday 28 April 2026 (90037)

Pictures of the HR side of PR2. No upper mounting holes for the HRST Baffle rail.

Images attached to this comment
H1 General
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:21, Tuesday 28 April 2026 (90034)
Generating an SHA Key and posting it to git.ligo.org so you can clone repos on a new laptop
J. Kissel, J. Freed

It's not the "right" place to find this information, but I was helping Josh get started with git, and I found my 2022 LHO:63463. We needed that step of generating an SSH key and posting it to his git.ligo.org profile. Of course, in 4 years, a minor detail has changed -- the location of where you put it on the web.

So, here's the 2026 version of the instructions on how to generate an SSH (SHA256) key and get ligo.org to recognize it enough to give you permissions to clone a project:

##ALL THE SAME
     jeffrey.kissel@opslogin0:/ligo/gitcommon/Calibration/ifo$ ssh-keygen 
     Generating public/private rsa key pair.
     Enter file in which to save the key (/ligo/home/jeffrey.kissel/.ssh/id_rsa): 
     /ligo/home/jeffrey.kissel/.ssh/id_rsa already exists.
     Overwrite (y/n)? y
     Enter passphrase (empty for no passphrase): 
     Enter same passphrase again: 
     Your identification has been saved in /ligo/home/jeffrey.kissel/.ssh/id_rsa.
     Your public key has been saved in /ligo/home/jeffrey.kissel/.ssh/id_rsa.pub.
     The key fingerprint is:
     SHA256:XQnWdPoBVmHwdsX3i+qpeTvANGQHFiI7zTXFN1oF7ew jeffrey.kissel@opslogin0
     The key's randomart image is:
     +---[RSA 2048]----+
     |     . . *B+=+O+.|
     |      = ++.=.@ .+|
     |     o oo . B B +|
     |      .  + o o =.|
     |        S o   + .|
     |         o   . E |
     |          . .    |
     |          .+.    |
     |         o++o    |
     +----[SHA256]-----+
     jeffrey.kissel@opslogin0:/ligo/gitcommon/Calibration/ifo$ cat /ligo/home/jeffrey.kissel/.ssh/id_rsa.pub 
     ssh-rsa AAAAB3NzaC1yc2EAAAADAQABAAABAQCebNagyBGRjYsoP4RT8KZ74HLONo6B4VOwBNUQpOPrNnMvQTD3NfTQJHWTgkcAFiCB2yLeioqJQmrigTd9BjnKx/1Eo4z1wvhC/hvCvD07IcvLgogP1lujyDyx7qYHBw46W1pFXXt1wqkFYFiDxcsNRgqhFqFBvdyVJdfPZs+GHqK8Df6AfKKZTWqrYgzpqYbvzl9q21E3vEUyTQamoftBimCZVSj1cz7+5W7giWBcBNmcuHzrV2/Af7pfzj8zoveXv/9qISyLKp0F4zlB52/lih9TzxTg36l8MCzIb2592xVsRaYtuxb8SA4Sst8bUqVvUFclj/rCD1ytEDfMvKyp jeffrey.kissel@opslogin0

###HERE'S WHERE IT'S DIFFERENT

Then I 
- went to https://git.ligo.org/-/user_settings/ssh_keys/ (####INSTEAD OF https://git.ligo.org/-/profile/keys)
- copied the above public id_rsa.pub hash into the "Key" field, 
- then let it auto-title the key,
- change the with expiration date something in the year 2080, and 
- hit the blue "add key" button.


Now, you can, say go to the https://git.ligo.org/spi/simulation/ page, and hit the blue "Code" button (####it's no longer called "Clone"), hit the two squares icon for copy in the "Clone with SSH" address, then in a (new or refreshed) terminal type

    $ git clone git@git.ligo.org:spi/simulation.git

and you're in business. 
From there, the CONTRIBUTING guide to pydarm is a place that I found the most helpful in how to develop / interact with a git project.
LHO VE
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:52, Tuesday 28 April 2026 (90033)
Tue CP1 Fill

Tue Apr 28 10:09:03 2026 INFO: Fill completed in 9min 0secs

 

Images attached to this report
H1 General
anthony.sanchez@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:00, Tuesday 28 April 2026 (90031)
Ops Tuesday Morning report

TITLE: 04/28 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
OUTGOING OPERATOR: None
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: MAINTENANCE
    Wind: 9mph Gusts, 4mph 3min avg
    Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.12 μm/s 
QUICK SUMMARY:

When I arrived there was an alarm for the Fire Pumps sounding on the verbals machine. Fire Pump 1 was on at 14:28 today possibly because of Work permit 13207.

LVEA temp is climbing and hasn't returned yet. Perhaps this is just the mega cleanroom affecting the temperature, but I will keep an "I" on it.

 

 

Images attached to this report
H1 CDS
erik.vonreis@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:19, Tuesday 28 April 2026 (90030)
Workstations updated

Workstations were updated and rebooted.  This was an os packages update.  Conda packages were not updated.

H1 ISC (CDS, INS, ISC, SYS)
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - posted 23:16, Monday 27 April 2026 - last comment - 23:46, Monday 27 April 2026(90026)
OMCA-QPD1 sense pin is shorted to the suspension platform, causing massive 60Hz problem (Elenna, Keita)

Problem

We started checking the health of QPDs and were puzzled that all four quadrants of the OMCA QPDA are much, much noisier than OMCA QPDB.

Note, there's a naming inconsistency about the QPD numbering between D2200276 wiring diagram and D0981811 (see "cartoon version"). 

D0981811 OMCA QPD-1 OMCA QPD-2 OMCB QPD-1 OMCB QPD-2
D2200276 QPD-2 QPD-1 QPD-8 QPD-7

Cause of the problem

Anyway, the problem was tracked down to short-circuit of common mode noise sensing line for OMCA-QPD1 (pin 11 of DB25 inside the vacuum, pin 3 outside of the vacuum, see attached) to the metal part of the suspension structure (i.e. ISI surface and the chamber) which in turn is grounded to the lab ground.

OMCA QPD-2 as well as both of the QPDs for OMCB are fine.

All QPD segments (incl. OMCA QPD1) responded to the flashlight.

Dark noise test: OMCB QPDs looks OK, not sure about OMCA QPDs

We connected a dual-QPD trans impedance chassis (S1102832, which is the original version of D1002481) to the OMCB QPDs like this:

QPDs-DB25 assy - in-vac cable (DB25F-DB25F)  - feedthrough simulator - DB25F-to-DB25M-cable - S1102832 front panel.

We looked at the output of the TIA with SR785 when there's only ambient light on QPDs (not much), segment by segment. No segment was extra noisy or anything.

OMCA QPDs are a different story because of the 60Hz problem. 

We'll see if the problem could be solved by somehow reassembling the QPD or cutting the noise line. 

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - 23:46, Monday 27 April 2026 (90029)

1st attachment shows the connection from the QPD to TIA. ("S1P" "S2N" etc. mean segment 1 positive pin, segment 2 negative pin etc.) Before the in-vac cable was actually connected to the feedthrough simulator, we confirmed that the positive bias (3V) came to pin 23 and pin 20 of the feedthrough simulator on the in-vac side as per the connection diagram D2200276.

2nd attachment shows how the output of the TIA (all differential) was connected to SR785 or oscilloscope, using QPD1 seg1 as an example.

3rd attachment shows that CH1 (yellow), which is the segment 1 positive pin of the QPD1 for OMCA, was terrible while the segment 1 positive of QPD2 for OMCA (blue) was not. Though there's no picture, the terrible 60Hz noise appeared in the negative pin with the opposite sign (for QPD1) so it's not cancelled.

For OMCB QPDs, DC offset of all segments were smaller than 1mV when there was no light (used a fluke DVM to measure across positive and negative pins). For OMCA QPD2 that was also the case.

OMCB_QPD[12]_SEG[1234].jpg are the noise measurements for OMCB QPDs using SR785. The TIA output (which receives 0.4:40 whitening in the chassis) just shows the TIA noise from 200Hz and higher for the entire frequency range without any light on QPDs, which looks fine to me. There's no reason to suspect that one or more of these segments/QPDs are broken.

The last attachment (QPD_removed.jpg) shows a measurement of OMCB_QPD2_SEG4 after disconnecting the QPD from the front panel, showing the TIA noise floor. SR785 noise floor is lower than this.

Images attached to this comment
H1 IOO (ISC)
jennifer.wright@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:48, Thursday 23 April 2026 - last comment - 17:36, Tuesday 28 April 2026(89988)
Comparison with IMC WFS before and after JAC installation

Jennie W, Jeff Kissel,

 

Summary: Can we see a difference in jitter with JAC in the IMC ASC sensors? Short answer, yes.

The IMC has less angular motion with JAC installed at some frequencies - jitter is being suppressed by the JAC so less input beam motion relative to the cavity axis. The QPD readouts are noisier with JAC but there is one new suspension between JAC and the IMC so maybe the beam pointing to MC1 is noisier? MC2 TRANS QPD looks pretty similar with and without JAC, but this makes sense as cavity axis is still well aligned to this QPD. I need some other figure of merit to look at jitter as it only limits the IFO above 20 Hz, see alog #86555 by Sheila.

Since there was no time for a full IFO lock betwen the HAM1 vent and the current vent of the corner volume, we cannot directly check whether the jitter coupling to DARM is better with the JAC cavity.

We have lots of data of the JAC and IMC locked after the installation of JAC, however.

So I compared two times when we had roughly 2W input from the PSL to HAM1. In both cases H1 and the corner were at vacuum to rule out confounding effects from purge air and other sound noise seen when HAM1 was at air.

In both these cases the IMC was locked.

The two times I used were:

2025/11/17 15:38:54 UTC no JAC, during O4c

2026/03/20 00:26:01 UTC JAC installed, HAM1 at vacuum

Here is the ASD measurements for five sensors in the pitch degree of freedom:

IMC REFL WFS A  Roughly the same above 10Hz with and without JAC. Better with JAC between 0.3 and 7Hz.

IMC REFL WFS B Roughly the same above 10Hz with and without JAC. Better with JAC below 7Hz.

IMC REFL QPD A has lower noise now below 5Hz than before JAC installation and much higher noise at frequencies above 10Hz.

IMC REFL QPD B has lower noise now below 3Hz than before JAC installation and much higher noise at frequencies above 10Hz.

MC2 TRANS QPD roughly the same with and without JAC.

Jitter noise is more of a problem in the 20-800 Hz region, which these plots don't tell us much about.

I also need the check YAW

 

 

 

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jennifer.wright@LIGO.ORG - 16:54, Thursday 23 April 2026 (89992)

I also plotted the yaw DOFs for each of the sensors I used above and for the same two reference times.

Images attached to this comment
jennifer.wright@LIGO.ORG - 17:36, Tuesday 28 April 2026 (90048)

I think it is impossible to tell from the measurements above whether the jitter is better. The peaks that could be jitter in the QPD measurements (WFS_A_DC and WFS_B_DC) are hard to compare as the background noise level is larger for the March measurements (with JAC). Even though the input power was roughly the same I suspect that the total SUM value of the QPDs was different between these two measurement times. Since pitch and yaw are normalised by the total sum value that would explain why the two WFS QPD measurements have different background noise levels. I can't see any obvious jitter peaks in the demodulated WFS signals (WFS_A_I and WFS_B_I).

Displaying reports 1-20 of 87472.Go to page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 End