Displaying reports 2401-2420 of 77273.Go to page Start 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 End
Reports until 16:19, Thursday 11 April 2024
LHO General
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:19, Thursday 11 April 2024 (77114)
Ops Day Shift End

TITLE: 04/11 Day Shift: 15:00-23:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 158Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Ryan S
SHIFT SUMMARY: A power glitch this morning cause the EY HEPI pump to trip off, but after it was recovered, we finished initial alignment (and fixed SRY), then all the way up. We've been locked for 5.5 hours.
LOG:

Start Time System Name Location Lazer_Haz Task Time End
16:17 SEI Ryan C EY n Reset HEPI pump controller 16:18
16:45 FAC Tyler, contractor Mids n Roof inspections 20:04
18:50 CDS Fil EY n Check on HEPI UPS 19:22
20:46 VAC Gerardo, Jordan MX n Looking for table 21:14
21:38 SQZ Camilla, Eric Optics Lab N Parts pick up/ drop offf 22:27
LHO General
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:05, Thursday 11 April 2024 (77122)
Ops Eve Shift Start

TITLE: 04/11 Eve Shift: 23:00-07:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 157Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: TJ
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: CALM
    Wind: 12mph Gusts, 7mph 5min avg
    Primary useism: 0.03 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.17 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY: H1 has been locked and observing for over 5 hours.

H1 ISC
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:43, Thursday 11 April 2024 (77107)
range comparison again

In last night's lock, the range steadily increased overnight, this looks like it is a result of the cleaning being better tuned for a thermalized IFO than for early in the lock.

We have for a long time had a reference of 165 Mpc on the front wall, which is from a time of OM2 warm.  This was the range reported by H1:CDS-SENSMON_CAL_SNSW_EFFECTIVE_RANGE_MPC, which did not have time dependent calibration corrections applied.  The range with calibration corrections applied at that time was H1:CDS-SENSMON_CLEAN_SNSC_EFFECTIVE_RANGE_MPC, closer to 160 Mpc. 

The attachment shows the spectrum and range comparison of last night to our previous reference time. 

Images attached to this report
LHO FMCS
eric.otterman@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:06, Thursday 11 April 2024 (77121)
AHU-3 airflow rate decrease
In order to reduce the duct static pressure of the hot and cold decks, we reduced the airflow rate from 15,000 CFM to 13,000 CFM. This lowered the static pressure in both ducts by roughly .05" which helped reduce the airflow noise in the control room. Currently one of the dual duct VAVs in the control room also has a degraded control board which will be replaced once available and should help further reduce the airflow noise. 
H1 AOS
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:06, Thursday 11 April 2024 (77120)
Optical Fiber Patch Panel Research
J. Kissel, F. Clara

Continuing along the design process for SPI, I asked Fil what we typically do for optical fiber "patch panels," where we want to modularize long optical fiber runs. He showed me this example of a fiber patch panel that uses off-the-shelf optical feedthrough parts. Note, as is specifically visible in IMG_4258.jpg, there is no optical element within the feedthrough. Hence, the feedthrough just serves the purpose of aligning the to connecting fibers for a (potentially lossy) brief fiber-to-air-and-back transition.

This isn't the only way we do it; for comms fibers like what goes from the timing master in the MSR to the timing fanout in the CER, we do somethin like what's shown in IMG_4254.jpg.

Alternatively, when optical fibers enter / exit a laser table (e.g. SQZT0 or the ALS ISCTEX or ISCTEY tables) we build our own labeled panel, that holds an off-the-shelf thorlabs feedthrough -- for example, the LO beam for the SQZ'er's panel is D1700147 which uses the Thor Labs part #ADAFC4.
Images attached to this report
H1 SEI
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:58, Thursday 11 April 2024 (77119)
H1 ISI CPS Noise Spectra Check - Weekly

FAMIS25985

ITMX ST1 was looking a bit higher, but perhaps not an issue yet. Everything else looks good.

Non-image files attached to this report
H1 ISC
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:12, Thursday 11 April 2024 - last comment - 12:53, Thursday 11 April 2024(77109)
peaks around 25-35 Hz

Sheila, Jennie W

We have some a series of peaks inthe DARM spectrum from 25-34 Hz, some of which have broad shoulders, which have been with us for a long time but are now more prominent due to improvements in low frequency sensitivity. 

I took a 2mHz resolution spectrum from a time with good range last night (165 Mpc).  I tried searching all of these frequencies on the alog but found none of them.

frequency (Hz)  
25.223  
26.475 maybe BS roll mode (0.3 Hz off)  Jennie found HAM6 channels in Gabriele's BRUCO from last night around 26.5 Hz. This frequency shifted since March 31st when it was at 26.512 Hz.  Jim found these peaks in HAM6 GS13s and HPI L4Cs, and sees them when the IFO is locked and unlocked.  He also sees that the frequency of this line shifted slightly since March 31st in the seismic sensors, as in DARM
27.418 HSTS bounce modes could be candidates (these look closest): SRM, SR2, PR2, MC1, MC2  Jim also sees this in HAM6 GS13s and L4Cs. 
27.504 SR2/SRM bounce modes are closest
27.707 SR3 bounce?
28.217 PR3 bounce  BRUCO shows coherence with PRCL, which
29.000 suspicously close to exactly 29 Hz, Jim also sees this in HAM6 GS13s and L4Cs.
29.971  
32.301 broad shoulder, dramatic change with PRCL offset
33.334  
33.428  
33.639 PR2 coherence
33.639  
33.513  
35.712  
40.938 HSTS and HLTS roll modes, PR2 and MC2 are closest.  40.938*0.6666 is 27.291 Hz, not lining up exactly with any of the above. (see similar discussion here: 21696

In the resonances wiki there is a ERM mode listed at 25.6281 (calculated not measured).  There is a BS roll mode (R3) calculated as 25.9175 Hz with a link to 49643, which suggests it is 26.06 Hz

Jennie searched Gabriele's Bruco from last night, and found that there are PRCL coherences for some of these peaks.  I retook the 2mHz spectra for a comparison of the times before and after the PRCL offset was first tuned, you can toggle between this and this screenshot to see the difference.  Since this PRCL offset was first put in, we have changed the BS camera spot position which brought back the board PRCL coherence this offset was getting rid of (76814).  The PRCL offset did seem to reduce the broad noise in DARM around these peaks, as you can see in the third attachment with with more binning. 

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
gabriele.vajente@LIGO.ORG - 12:53, Thursday 11 April 2024 (77117)

Here's a similar effort from a few weeks ago: 76505 

Interestingly, some of the peaks appear to have moved:

25.194 to 25.225 Hz
26.536 to 26.477 Hz
27.041 Hz is gone
29.500 Hz is gone
33.591 to 33.642 Hz
35.221 to 35.400 Hz
39.800 Hz is gone

 

Images attached to this comment
H1 ISC (OpsInfo)
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:02, Thursday 11 April 2024 (77113)
Initial alignment SRY triggering moved from POP_A to AS_C

Following up from my alog77064 saying that this needed to change, today I moved SRY triggering from POP_A_DC to AS_C_NSUM with new trigger threshold of upper=0.005 and lower=0.004. This worked well and gave us a quick, well aligned DRMI during main locking. The Acquire_SRY state used to lower the trigger thresholds after a few minutes for times that we had less power on POP_A, I've removed the lowering but added a notification to check the alignment or triggering.

I've updated ALIGN_IFO to reflect this and committed to the SVN. I anticipate we might need to fine tune these thresholds over the coming weeks.

Images attached to this report
H1 SEI (OpsInfo)
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:28, Thursday 11 April 2024 - last comment - 12:45, Thursday 11 April 2024(77112)
EY HEPI trip, VFH panel reset

The ETMY HEPI pump tripped this morning around 14:35 UTC (7:35am PST) potentially from the CS power glitch? I ended up going out to the Yend mech room and reset the VFH panel to reset the HEPI pump controller. The light was still on when I first checked the panel, I pressed the green ON button first which did not fix the issue, I then cycled it off and back on, pressing the red then green button, confirming that the light went off and on which Jim confirmed to have fixed it. Jim then brought back the pressure to 70PSI from  the Beckoff_Pump_Controller medm.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
filiberto.clara@LIGO.ORG - 12:45, Thursday 11 April 2024 (77116)

Verified the HEPI Beckhoff electronics are powered by 24V from the VAC-R1 rack. Vacuum rack is on UPS.

LHO VE
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:16, Thursday 11 April 2024 (77111)
Thu CP1 Fill

Thu Apr 11 10:12:01 2024 INFO: Fill completed in 11min 57secs

Jordan confirmed a good fill curbside

Images attached to this report
H1 ISC
gabriele.vajente@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:40, Thursday 11 April 2024 (77108)
Coherences from last night

BruCo scan from a good range time from last night: https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~gabriele.vajente/bruco_1396823046_GDS_CALIB_CLEAN/

Some highlights:

The last two plots show what improvement in sensitivity we should be able to get by reducing the above noise couplings, and which of the above noises contribute most at each frequency. Those plots are produced by offline subtraction with NonSENS

Images attached to this report
H1 CDS
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:32, Thursday 11 April 2024 - last comment - 09:43, Thursday 11 April 2024(77106)
MSR UPS went onto battery backup for 2 seconds, power issue at 07:35:02 Thu 11 Apr 2024 PDT

The MSR UPS went onto battery backup for 2 seconds at 07:35:02 due to an AC power glitch.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - 09:43, Thursday 11 April 2024 (77110)

Here is the UTC, GPS Timing of the glitch

Images attached to this comment
LHO General
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:05, Thursday 11 April 2024 - last comment - 08:07, Thursday 11 April 2024(77104)
Ops Day Shift Start

TITLE: 04/11 Day Shift: 15:00-23:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Aligning
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Ryan C
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: CALM
    Wind: 3mph Gusts, 2mph 5min avg
    Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.15 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY: 17 hour lock ended about an hour ago. H1 is currently running an alignment, but stuck at green locking with no light on Y arm. HEPI and both ISI statges at EY have tripped during locking, not sure of the cause yet.

 

Comments related to this report
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - 08:07, Thursday 11 April 2024 (77105)SEI

HEPI EY pump controller looks to have tripped off for some reason. I'll get ahold of Jim and continue investigating.

LHO FMCS (DetChar, PEM)
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:18, Wednesday 10 April 2024 - last comment - 12:06, Thursday 11 April 2024(77101)
Extra Loud Air Handler Noise in Control Room

Starting around 00:20 UTC (5:20pm PDT) this evening, the air has been much louder in the control room. Called Bubba to ask about it, and he says it's related to Eric's work today on the AHU-3 VAV (alog77092) and that the temporary ducting may have come undone. Other than it being louder in the control room, the duct should be fine and will be addressed in the morning.

I have not noticed a noticeable change in the IFO range since this noise increase, but I'll tag PEM and DetChar just in case.

Comments related to this report
eric.otterman@LIGO.ORG - 12:06, Thursday 11 April 2024 (77115)
This particular issue seems to have been caused by tubing coming loose from the pressure transducer for the supply fan on the hot deck side of AHU-3. The control system no longer had a reference for the fan static pressure and opened the vanes to maximum which sent the duct static pressure to over 3" W.C. The air handler ran this way all night until I was able to reconnect the tubing and reset the air handler. 
H1 ISC
gabriele.vajente@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:22, Wednesday 10 April 2024 - last comment - 19:20, Friday 12 April 2024(77091)
HAM1 feed-forward to ASC retuning

HAM1 ASC FF was off from 1396381762 to 1396382969 (20 minutes starting 90 minutes into lock). Using this data I could retune the feed forward filters that subtract HAM1 motion from the ASC signals.

I based the attached jupyter code on an older version, and automated the subtraction training for all pitch and yaw ASC signals (CHARD, INP1, PRC2, DC1 and DC2).

Looking at the filters that are loaded now, we used to do the FF only for the pitch degrees of freedom. The subtraction seems to be doing something good in yaw too, so I suggest we upload and try the yaw feedforward filter.

The first plot shows the expected subtraction predicted by NonSENS. The second plot shows the absolute value of the transfer functions.

Finally, the attached text file contains the foton filter definitions for all the feedforward filter banks. I haven't upload those flter to foton, and not tried them yet. Before each filter there is the name of the filter bank where it should be loaded, for example H1:HPI-HAM1_TTL4C_FF_CART2ASCP_1_1

Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
gabriele.vajente@LIGO.ORG - 13:40, Friday 12 April 2024 (77135)

[Jennie, Jim, Gabriele]

We tried the new filter, and there's something wrong with them. Even with a gain of 0.5 (instead of 1) they make some of the ASC signals much worse, see attached plot.

We'll use the time we got today with FF off (starting 1396987833 and lastring 10 minutes) to debug the problem and retune the FF

In the attached plot: green = FF off, blue = nominal FF, red = new FF with half gain

Images attached to this comment
jennifer.wright@LIGO.ORG - 16:04, Thursday 11 April 2024 (77123)CDS, ISC, SEI

Gabriele, Jim, Jennie W

I saved the new HAM FF filters in H1SEIPROC foton file. These will only be loaded in during our commissioning window tomorrow.

Images attached to this comment
gabriele.vajente@LIGO.ORG - 19:20, Friday 12 April 2024 (77137)

The code attached to this alog had a bug that produces the wrong filters. Attached an updated version, hopefully without any more bugs. Also attached the new text filw with all the filters.

The two plots show the expected subtarction and the absolute value of the filters.

Images attached to this comment
Non-image files attached to this comment
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - 15:43, Friday 12 April 2024 (77138)

Gabriele's new coefficients have been loaded into SEIPROC and are available, but haven't been turned on or tested yet.

H1 CDS (ISC, PSL)
filiberto.clara@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:08, Tuesday 09 April 2024 - last comment - 12:35, Wednesday 17 April 2024(77062)
SPI Pick-off Fiber Length

WP 11805
ECR E2400083

Lengths for possible SPI Pick-off fiber. Part of ECR E2400083.

PSL Enclosure to PSL-R2 - 50ft
PSL-R2 to SUS-R2 - 100ft
SUS-R2 to Top of HAM3 (flange D7/D8) - 25ft
SUS-R2 to HAM3 (flange D5) - 20ft

Comments related to this report
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 16:28, Tuesday 09 April 2024 (77072)
J. Kissel [for J. Oberling]

Jason also took the opportunity during his dust monitoring PSL incursion today to measure the distance between where the new fiber collimator would go on the PSL table to the place where it would exit at the point Fil calls the PSL enclosure.

He says 
SPI Fiber Collimator to PSL Enclosure = 9ft.
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 13:53, Thursday 11 April 2024 (77118)
J. Kissel [for F. Clara, J. Oberling]

After talking with Fil I got some clarifications on how he defines/measures his numbers:
   - They *do* include any vertical traversing that the cable might need to go through,
   - Especially for rack-to-rack distances, always assumes that the cable will go to the bottom of the rack (typically 10 ft height from cable tray to rack bottom), 
   - He adds two feet (on either end) such that we can neatly strain relieve and dress the cable.

So -- the message -- Fil has already built in some contingency into the numbers above. 
(More to the point: we should NOT consider them "uncertain" and in doing so add an addition "couple of feet here" "couple of feet there" "just in case.")

Thanks Fil!

P.S. We also note that, at H1, the optical fibers exit the PSL at ground level on the +X wall of the enclosure between the enclosure and HAM1, underneath the light pipes. Then the immediately shoot up to the cable trays, then wrap around the enclosure, and then land in the ISC racks at PSL-R2. Hence the oddly long 50 ft. number for that journey.

Jason also reports that he rounded up to the nearest foot for his measurement of the 9ft run from where the future fiber collimator will go to the PSL enclosure "feed through."
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 12:35, Wednesday 17 April 2024 (77249)SEI, SYS
Upon discussion with the SPI team, we want to minimize the number of "patch panel" "fiber feedthrough" connections in order to minimize loss and polarization distortion.

As such, we prefer to go directly from the "SPI pick-off in the PSL" fiber collimator directly to the Laser Prep Chassis in SUS-R2.
That being said purchase all of the above fiber lengths, such that we can re-create a "fiber feedthrough patch panel full" system as contingency plan.

So, for the baseline plan, we'll take the "original, now contingency plan" PSL-R2 to SUS-R2, 100 ft fiber run and use that to directly connect the "SPI pick-off in the PSL" fiber collimator directly to the Laser Prep Chassis in SUS-R2.

I spoke with Fil and confirmed that 100 ft is plenty enough to make that run (from SPI pick-off in PSL to SUS-R2).
Displaying reports 2401-2420 of 77273.Go to page Start 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 End