The updated mode-matching solution to account for the noise eater alog(44783) assumed a waist at the coupler of 750um (because that was in the thorlabs documnentation recommended). However a measurement indicates a waist of 500um out of the coupler.
I adjusted the solution SHGtoFiberAM.pdf alog(44783) to move the ROC75 lens 6cm closer to the SHG the ROC200 lens 1-2 cm further away from the SHG and the fiber coupler 10 cm further away from the SHG to get a waist of 550um.
To get a waist of 500um would take a relatively major path rearrangement and with the vent only hours away it was a little risky to do it now, I will fine tune after the vent and hopefully the proper solution will be significantly above 85%.
Turned ON air compressors in chiller yard for instrument air, QDP80 is ON, and purge air skid is ON.
Hard closed GV 1,2 this morning and then vented HAM6 (~45 min. vent). Dew point measured -45degC just before valving in purge air.
I've put in a temporary bypass for HAM6. We'll bypass others as the vent progresses.
Bypass will expire:
Tue Nov 13 08:36:07 PST 2018
For channel(s):
H0:VAC-LX_Y0_PT110_MOD1_PRESS_TORR
Extended bypass to include HAM1 (PT100) as well as HAM6 (PT110)
Bypass will expire:
Mon Nov 19 13:41:43 PST 2018
For channel(s):
H0:VAC-LX_Y0_PT110_MOD1_PRESS_TORR
H0:VAC-LY_X0_PT100B_PRESS_TORR
TITLE: 11/12 Day Shift: 16:00-00:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Commissioning
OUTGOING OPERATOR: None
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
Wind: 8mph Gusts, 6mph 5min avg
Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.30 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
15:00 Peter out to PSL
15:17 Chris S out to LVEA to fix scaffold
15:18 Cheryl out to PSL
15:40 Cleaning crew out to LVEA
16:16 Chris S out
In prep for this weeks vented volumes followed M1300464 and shut down High Voltage and other system of concer.
EY
Ring Heater switched off
+-430V ESD supplies shut off
Pico Motors disabled.
Corner station
Ring Heaters for ITMs and SR3 where shut off. ITMX was already off.
Fast shutter controller HV disabled chassis powered down Power supply off
PZT unit powered down PZT power supply off.
ESD Power supply off
All pico motors confirmed to be or placed in disabled.
OPO TEC servo turned to the off position.
The LVEA has transitioned to LASER SAFE.
This is under work permit #7934, and facilitates the venting of the corner station.
n.b.
On site now. Will head out to lock HAM 6 HEPI and disable the ISI to disconnect cables from feedthrus. Will comment here when complete.
Completed:
Locked HEPI while isolated. Off in Z about 50um, others DOFs better. ISI OFFLINE with corner 3 Sensor and coil driver chassis powered down. Corner 3 Actuator cables disconnected from chamber feed thru. CPS cables left attached for their protection.
Clean room running now. Leaving site.
Georgia mentioned yesterday that the fast shutter lockloss guardian was failing it's check. We saw this again today, after we powered up and then reduced the power with the interferometer still locked.
The problem here was that the shutter lockloss check guardian watches the transmitted arm powers, and if they go above a threshold it watches for the shutter to fire when we loose lock. We went below this threshold when we reduced the power again to do OMC scans, which caused the LOCKLOSS_SHUTTER_CHECK guardian to go into the failed state, which it stays in until a human intervenes by taking it to init.
The shutter has passed it's test a few times today.
This happened again, but even when we didn't decrease the power, this is probably more similar to what Georgia mentioned.
Attached is a screenshot of the guardian log, and the channels used to check the arm circulating power at the time.
This happened at Nov 12 2018 00:05:03 UTC. You would expect the guardian to jump from state 10 (HIGH_ARM_POWER) to state 20 (CHECK_SHUTTER) if the circulating power drops below it's lower threshold in either arm while the in the HIGH_ARM_POWER state. The lower threshold is 41000 counts on the TR_B_NSUM units plotted in the attached dataviewer, and neither channel drops below that threshold.
We observed some improvement with larger PD current yesterday. It was not clear to us why. There is some chance that a calibration issue is fooling us, but at the low frequencies we were looking at the calibration should only depend on the actuator. Either way, to get to the bottom of this, we revisited the whitening of those PDs. Currently, we are using 10mAmp per diode in regular operation. If the violins are smaller (as the were yesterday) we can increase the DARM offset to operate at about 15mAmp per diode, but that becomes a problem when the violin modes are high. Attached is a plot of the whitening situation of out OMC DCPDs in full lock, with about 14mAmp per photo diode. ndsope inset top: ADC signed of the photo diode ndsope inset bottom: photo current on the photo diode dtt red: PD signal in cts ADC (which is loop gain suppressed, hence the dip at 30Hz amd the peak at 100Hz) dtt blue: dark noise dtt green: possible option with current whitening filters: additionally engage a 2nd whitening stage plus the low-pass. Reduce the DARM offset by 3.2dB to get the violin mode peaks back down where they were. It would be worth testing the green configuration, just to exclude that we have some load-dependent dark noise after the whitening stages.
Had same issue initially (as on Tuesday) trying to start the Kobelco this morning - namely, "RTD Error" and all displayed temperatures showing "-115F". Cycled power, wiggled RTD wires and eventually it reset but it isn't clear what fixed the issue. Also, the right drying tower failed to switch initially but began working after manually forcing it to switch.
I did not turn on the HAM6 cleanroom as it is thought that Hugh R., had volunteered to do this when he came later today and, at least a few, commissioners could use more "low noise" time this morning.
A BruCo scan of 500 seconds with a sensitivty around 93 Mpc (45197) can be found at the link below
https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~gabriele.vajente/bruco_1225937545/
Georgia, Craig, Peter, Stefan Tonight we worked on increasing the input power to 28W. - Along the way we found MICH marginally stable at 5-ish Hz - we increased the final MICH gain from 1.7 to 2.5. - Initially we increased the power by AC-coupling the ISS 2nd loop in low-noise, and manually stepping the power up using the POWER guardian. That method actually increased the light level on the DCPDs (as the DARM offset is not reduced to compensate). Interestingly, that seemed to slightly improve the the low-frequency noise too - we don't really understand why. We believe thee effect is there if we only use the DARM offset. - We tried going to 30W input, but started seeing increasing recycling gain fluctuations, followed by what seems to be a lock-loss due to CARM. So we left Guardian at 28W. We directly go there in the regular power-up step. - Initially, at 25W, we tried to increase Hang's radiation pressure compensation by stepping up the RPC gains by a factor of 1.5, as designed for 25W. (see Hang's alog 44709). That actually led to an instability. We were successfully able to increase it by a factor of 1.2 using z step H1:ASC-RPC_DHARD_P_GAIN *1.2 H1:ASC-RPC_DHARD_Y_GAIN *1.2 H1:ASC-RPC_CHARD_P_GAIN *1.2 H1:ASC-RPC_CHARD_Y_GAIN *1.2 However, in the end we did not need to do that to go to 30W, so that is not in the Guardian. - We ran an A2L at 28Watt. - At 28Watt input we noticed a significant decrease in the CARM gain - an we had to compensate by adding 11dB of gain in the CM board. After roughly 30min we lost lock due to ASC: CHARD_Y, PRC2_Y and SRC1_Y started running away. Attached is a DARM spectrum of the best we saw today - H1:CDS-SENSMON_CAL_SNSW_EFFECTIVE_RANGE_MPC called it at 93Mpc.
A couple of notes on locking tonight:
We updated the NLN power to 27 W (i.e. 25 W requested).
With locklosses from 28 W the fast shutter lockloss guardian asks for the user to check that the fast shutter closed. Today we have been running this guardian through the INIT state by hand to fix the problem, otherwise ISC_LOCK gets stuck in DOWN.
For most of today with the new set power the CO2X power did not get turned down by the guardian during the lock. I updated the CO2 power guardian "PSL_TARGET_POWER" to 25 W (but I haven't updated the set powers, so for now CO2X still delivers 100 mW at NLN), to fix this.
During our several 28-30W locks tonight the noise in REFL_A_LF gradually increased over the course of ~20 minutes until we lost lock. See attached screenshot of one of the 30 W locks today for an idea of the scale (REFL_A_LF is bottom left). During the last lock this evening (at 27W, CO2X power at nominal level, after an initial alignment) the noise increase on REFL_A_LF is slower.
I noticed a couple of ETMY violin modes getting rung up with their default guardian settings, have lowered the gains of MODE1 and MODE5 in the guardian. MODE1 is worth keeping an eye on.
Attaching a noise budget plot (now with giant dots) taken during our 27W lock.
Excellent. Congratulations.
From Nov 10 2018 09:13:41 UTC to 09:19:27 UTC, the interferometer heroically rode out a fairly large earthquake for as long as it could. The ASC performed beautifully for about six minutes, handling the seismic waves as if they were the GW stochastic background. While this free seismic noise injection was happening, we saw the same exact scatter shelf in DARM that we saw earlier when we were injecting frequency noise around the OMC dither line. Green in the attached plot is DARM during the frequency noise injection, the linear coupling visible from 3.5 to 4.5 kHz, the nonlinear seen at DC. Red is DARM during the earthquake. Grey is our reference. It could simply be elevated ASC controls noise, but it was eerily close to the same OMC noise we had just seen. Could OMC ASC be responsible? We have also been having timing system errors H1:SYS-TIMING_Y_PPS_A_ERROR_FLAG audible updates every two minutes.
Attached is a spectrogram of the heroic earthquake rideout time, so it's definitely scattering as the knee in the spectrum suggests. Livingston has in 41482 seen scattering fringes associated with too much motion of OM3. When I looked at the OMs the motion didn't seem quite right to explain this. But using only length degrees of freedom no suspensions that I looked at matched the fringes well.
Reading the alog linked from the original entry 45180 a drive to OMC PZT2 led to low frequency noise in DARM (that resembles a scattered light shoulder as well). There is discussion there of frequency noise being down-converted. But I wonder if it could be that the OMC mirror is actually moving enough to make fringing? To figure that out I'd have to know the calibration of the OMC PZT2 channel (which I don't yet). But I do think it's interesting that if I assume OMC PZT2 is proportional to length, and if I lowpass it at 7Hz, take its derivate and scale it, it resembles the fringe frequency during the earthquake better than any of the suspension length channels I looked at. The figure shows the spectrogram from above, the timeseries of H1:OMC-PZT2_MON_DC_OUT_DQ, and the scaled derivative of that channel overlayed as a transparency. Admittedly, very far from conclusive but maybe it makes sense to look again at the OMC PZT2 injections with scatter in mind.
I approximately calibrated OMC PZT2 back in July: It was about 6.69 MHz/V, using the FSR Koji reports of 264.8 MHz alongside a single-bounce OMC scan.
The reported length of the OMC is 1.132 m, so the PZT calibration is also 2.69 * 10-8 m/V.
The PZT can be a nonlinear actuator, of course, so don't take these numbers too seriously, but they are better than nothing.
As far as frequency noise downconversion, the current wisdom from Sheila is that the OMC dither signal is masked by excess frequency noise at 4.1 kHz, so increasing the OMC dither improves the SNR of the dither-locking loop and reduces the OMC controls noise, which can pollute DARM at low frequency, but generally doesn't.
It's unclear to me how exactly frequency noise at 4.1 kHz can cause the scattering shelf to rise, but it is clearly happening.
It would be interesting to see if the fringing from the 12 Hz line is the same as the fringing from the earthquake, and if the fringing from the frequency noise is the same as the earthquake.
Here's a table of the excitation times from Sheila's alog 45180 Friday:
Curve Color Description Time
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yellow curve 12 Hz with low OMC dither amplitude Nov 10 2018, 03:32:17 UTC
Brown curve 12 Hz with high OMC dither amplitude Nov 10 2018, 03:54:18 UTC
Pink curve Freq Noise Injection, low OMC dither Nov 10 2018, 04:18:15 UTC
Cyan curve Freq Noise Injection, high OMC dither Nov 10 2018, 04:21:15 UTC
I think it's likely there are two different noise couplings. It would be good to double check the spectrograms, I wouldn't expect to see scattering shelves in the data from 45180 since that is a bilinear coupling where the 12Hz line is dominating the rms.
It might be that we could avoid this noise in time when there are large earthquakes by rolling off the OMC length loop faster.
Fil Marc Daniel
We modified the spare CM board (s/n S1102622) according to E1800338 and swapped it with the existing one (s/n S1102621). This modification includes low pass filters for the DAQ readbacks, and a frequency change in the first two boost stages to 10Hz/500Hz.
These modifications improve our readbacks. Previous data is in alog 45131.
Fig 1 shows the readbacks of the modified board.
Fig 2 shows the new 10/500Hz analog boost filter. The RMS of the error signal gets reduced by ~400.
Looking at one of the higher power runs with a REFL fast gain of +24dB, IMC IN2 gain of -24dB and a REFL IN1 gain of 9dB, we can see that both error and control signal readbacks show again excess noise. The fast/in2 gains may be too high and we should try 16dB instead. Not sure what's up with the error signal readback, maybe too much in-loop gain with the additional boost.
The figure shows spectra from the 4 angular IMC WFS DC channels with labeled peaks. Eight of the peaks between 80 and 1000 Hz are from optics or structures on the PSL table, two were from IOT2 and four haven’t been identified. The unidentified peaks were not excited by our PSL injections, even the global ones. It is possible that they are associated with structures that weren’t excited on IOT2 or in HAM2, or they may be associated with structures on the PSL table that we weren’t able to excite.
The identified sources are table resonances, periscope resonances and optic mount resonances. All optics that produced peaks in the spectrum were downstream of the PMC and were mirrors rather than through-optics like lenses, as would be expected.
The figure also shows the location of the sources in the PSL, as well as samples of the bowing and tapping data used to make the identifications.
Robert, Craig
This version of the jitter spectrum includes photos of the optics. It should be easy to lower the Q of some of the higher-Q optics like M3.
This is a very interesting and impactful glimpse into the current state of PSL table jitter coupling. Wish I had noted the study on first release.
I'm sure many would be interested in seeing an equivalent study of LLO, in everyone's spare time
.
This study is relevant to IIET Ticket 4639 with title: "ECR: Modify attachment of optics mount to mounting plate on PSL periscope, previously Bug 1140". This IIET Ticket corresponds to the upper periscope mirror mount, with designator IO_MB_M6.
This study is relevant to IIET Ticket 5132 with title: "Move IO input beam PZT-mount from periscope to PSL/IO table surface". This IIET Ticket corresponds to the steering mirror upstream of the periscope which has a PZT actuator, with designator IO_MB_M4.
This effort was subsequently re-examined by Robert in
https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=44460
Inserted pins on GV 1,2 gates, but LOTO at power disconnect.
IP14 on HAM6 had tripped a few minutes before venting. Either HV cable was bumped during chamber cleaning or gas load from compressing o-ring on gate valve exceeded tight pressure interlock. After a couple of hours being off, it turned back on with no problems.