Displaying reports 45441-45460 of 84840.Go to page Start 2269 2270 2271 2272 2273 2274 2275 2276 2277 End
Reports until 12:52, Wednesday 14 February 2018
LHO General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:52, Wednesday 14 February 2018 - last comment - 16:11, Wednesday 14 February 2018(40529)
DAY Operator Summary

TITLE: 02/14 Day Shift: 16:00-00:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
INCOMING OPERATOR: None
SHIFT SUMMARY:

I covered first part of shift & handed over to Patrick as I assisted with HAM6 in-vac cable work.  Main activities of the day so far:

LOG:  (items in bold are ongoing)

Comments related to this report
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 16:11, Wednesday 14 February 2018 (40538)

Patrick covered from 20:52 - 22:45.  Activities for latter part of shift:

  • 20:58 Elizabeth leading tour out of control room
  • 21:09 Corey and Nico to HAM6, in vacuum cabling, cover on septum window
    • 22:40 Corey out
  • 21:48 Peter to H2 diode room enclosure to look for hardware
  • 22:01 Peter back. Going to H1 diode room.
  • 22:03-22:14 Terry to squeezer bay
  • 22:12 Mark to EX, moving FFUs around with snorkel lift
  • 22:32 Gerardo to MY
  • 22:45 Back from ETMy SUS work (Travis, Betsy)
  • 22:46 MY work done for Ken
  • 22:47 Tuning Bounce Roll Dampers, BRDs, in the Vacuum Prep Lab (short break during Site Weekly Meeting)(kissel)
  • 22:57 Large Dust counts observed at EX.  Eventually tracked this down to most likely the Manlift being moved in to the VEA and/or it being charged right next to Dust Monitor #1 in the VEA.  Bartlett investigated and noted an odor in the area of the Manlift (which was being charged) & also only seeing "1Amp" on the charger.  We decided to unplug it.  Still not conclusive if it was having both doors open or the charging which caused the large counts.  We will look into this tomorrow.  Bubba was contacted about this and we will coordinate/monitor charging with Mark D.
  • 23:50 Optics Lab work (Sheila)
H1 General (SQZ)
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:41, Wednesday 14 February 2018 (40531)
Arm Installed on HAM6 South Door

Bubba G., Mark D., TJ

The install arm has been installed on the HAM6 South door for the OPOS (VOPO) install. Bubba and Mark started early to put the flange protectors on and hunt for hardware. I showed up just as they were lifting the arm into place. Both the arm and the HAM Structure Lift (D1001664) went on without any issues. I gave the arm a good cleaning and then put a cover on it and locked it into place. It should be ready for use next week.

Big thank you to Bubba and Mark!

LHO General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:19, Wednesday 14 February 2018 - last comment - 09:10, Wednesday 14 February 2018(40528)
Morning Status

TITLE: 02/14 Day Shift: 16:00-00:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
OUTGOING OPERATOR: None
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    Wind: 5mph Gusts, 3mph 5min avg
    Primary useism: 0.06 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.23 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:

Comments related to this report
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 09:10, Wednesday 14 February 2018 (40530)
  • HAM6 Arm installation was happening before 8am & is ongoing (TJ went out to assist).
  • Big work for CP4 (WP7343) as they hope to completely boil off all liquid nitrogen inside CP4 (hope to have it empty late afternoon/early evening).
  • Continued from yesterday:  ITMy SUS @SAFE & ITMy SEI @DAMPED (per Fil ITMy SUS investigations)
H1 AWC (AWC)
thomas.vo@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:00, Wednesday 14 February 2018 (40527)
SR3 Heater Beckhoff Code Installed

D Sigg, TVo

Cleaned up the naming conventions to make the heater library generic and added said library to PLC3 in the corner station.  Re-scanned  the system manager and linked the PLC variables to the terminals.

H1 SQZ (SQZ)
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:19, Tuesday 13 February 2018 (40526)
OPO input/output coupler swapped

Sheila, Terry

We have swapped the input/output coupler on the H1 OPO.  The original optic was M1 from E1600051, and we have swapped it now with E1700299, which has a reflectivity of 98% for 532, so that we can use our OPO as a reference cavity.

Although this optic is M1, the mount it is on is labeled M4 because the other M1 mounts were used already.  We found that the optic was misaligned in pitch when we tried to swap it.  We measured the distance between the prompt reflection about 10mm above the leakage beam at a distance of 500mm from the cavity (we are using the 1064 beam which was aligned into the input/output coupler for the escape efficiency measurement), meaning that the beam had a 1 degree misalignment or that the mirror was pitched by +0.5 degrees compared to the original optic. 

We think the problem is the wedge of the optic.  There is an arrow on the barel which is supposed to indicate the thick part of the optic, for the original M1 that arrow is on the side of the optic farther away from the crystal, so that the wedge is horizontal.  For the new coupler, it is rotated about 45degrees clockwise from that position (the arrow is on the upper half of the barel, away from the crystal.)  Since the wedge is a half a degree this probably explains the misalignment we see. 

There is no way to adjust pitch in these mounts, but Hugh brought us some class A shims that were used for ISIs.  Hugh suggested that we place the edge of the shim half way along the front feet on the mirror holder (D1600063), so that we would be able to adjust pitch by sliding it back and forth.  We used a 5 thousandths of an inch shim and were easily able to adjust the optic pitch.  The field used for the escape efficiency measurement is again aligned to the cavity. 

H1 AOS
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:56, Tuesday 13 February 2018 (40524)
ETMY Suspension rebiuld status

Travis and Kissel spent the morning measuring violin modes of the new ETMY suspension (Kissel is digesting data).  In the afternoon, Travis and I worked on aligning the reaction chain well enough that it would suspend without mechanical interference.  We paused the round when we got the oplev main reflection beam (2nd beam up due to wedge of ETM16) on the oplev off center by under 100urad in pitch and yaw.  We then realigned all of the top stage tablecloth brackets and install and aligned the top BOSEMs.  After a few more rounds of iterative adjustment and alignment work, we repeated the process on the AOSEMs inside the PenRe mass.  A few quick P and V TFs show that both the main and reaction chains are free, but will recheck tomorrow.  Next up... mine for overnight spectra from tonight in order for Kissel to pre-tune the BRD assemblies that are due to be installed next.

H1 SQZ (SQZ)
nutsinee.kijbunchoo@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:52, Tuesday 13 February 2018 (40507)
ISCT6 1064 faraday isolator measurement

Overall transmission: 95%

About 95% of the power going in is S-pol so the transmission was calculated based on everything that came out over S-pol power that went in. The half wave plate at the output of the isolator hasn't been fixed so it still spits out mostly P-pol. About .5% of what came out was S-pol (a half wave plate has been installed to fix the polarization).

 

Isolation: -30.5 dB

Usual set up: Mirror facing flat at the output and beam splitter at the input. I found a non-polarize beam splitter for 1064 this time. Assuming no losses in the reflection I measured the power that came back through the isolator and reflected off the beam splitter. Taken the known input power and the percentage of the reflected power before going into the isolator into account I calculated the total power that came back through the faraday.

H1 SUS
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:49, Tuesday 13 February 2018 (40523)
H1 SUS PRM M3 L2P / P2L Transfer Functions
J. Kissel, K. Kawabe

I've taken L, P, and Y driven transfer functions of the final/bottom/optic/M3 stage of H1 SUS PRM to gather what the longitudinal-to-pitch cross coupling "typically" looks like for an HSTS. Also, I've compared the results against the HSTS dynamical model, just because I'd never focused on how poorly the off-diagonal elements of the model reproduce reality. Keita had asked me for the information to help validate the recent PRC spot position measurement LHO aLOG 40477.

Attached are the results and the hacky, non-svn'd script used to generate it. #slapsownwrist

Data lives here:
/ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/HSTS/H1/PRM/SAGM3/Data/
2018-02-13_2350_H1SUSPRM_M3_WhiteNoise_L_0p01to50Hz.xml
2018-02-13_2350_H1SUSPRM_M3_WhiteNoise_P_0p01to50Hz.xml
2018-02-13_2350_H1SUSPRM_M3_WhiteNoise_Y_0p01to50Hz.xml
Non-image files attached to this report
H1 CDS
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:38, Tuesday 13 February 2018 - last comment - 10:41, Wednesday 14 February 2018(40521)
svn wrapper script to hopefully help with different versioned working directores

In the hope of making our lives simpler, I have created a wrapper bash script for svn commands. It checks the current working directory to determine which version of svn was used to create the directory, and then runs the appropriate version of svn client. It passes all the arguments given to itself onwards to the svn binary. The hope is that this is all totally transparent to the user.

The script is found in /ligo/cds/userscripts/svn which is a link to /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/cds/common/scripts/svn.bsh

If /ligo/cds/userscripts is ahead of /usr/bin in your PATH environment variable, you will be calling the wrapper script every time you run svn.

If you need to reconfigure your PATH to make this so, please add the following line to your .bashrc file in your home directory

export PATH=/ligo/cds/userscripts:/usr/bin:$PATH

you can confirm the path by typing 'which svn' which should return '/ligo/cds/userscripts/svn'

Now that the svn client version is tied to the working directory's version, you can find the version by running "svn --version"

For example, in /ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/QUAD/H1/Common
svn, version 1.6.17 (r1128011)

whereas in /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/cds/common/scripts
svn, version 1.8.10 (r1615264)

code-listing

Comments related to this report
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - 10:41, Wednesday 14 February 2018 (40532)

A nice feature when checking out a brand new working directory is that, because there is no .svn directory, the script defaults to creating a 1.8 versioned working directory.

LHO General
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:02, Tuesday 13 February 2018 (40512)
Ops Day Shift Summary

TITLE: 02/13 Day Shift: 16:00-00:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
INCOMING OPERATOR: None
SHIFT SUMMARY:
LOG:

H1 SUS (CDS)
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:39, Tuesday 13 February 2018 - last comment - 12:50, Wednesday 14 February 2018(40517)
H1 SUS ETMY R0 F2 OSEM's Test/Coil Enable BIO Frozen in OFF Position
J. Kissel, T. Sadecki, B. Weaver

Betsy and Travis are beginning to resurrect the top mass OSEMs on the newly re-suspended H1 SUS ETMY. In doing so, they've found R0 F2 OSEM's Test/Coil Enable BIO Frozen in OFF Position. Toggling the test/coil enable (TCE) state from 0 or 1 moves all of the rest of the R0 TCE switches, but F2's remains in the stuck position. This could be either the readback stuck, which wouldn't be a priority to fix, or it could actually be the switch that's dead, which would be a major blocker for activity. 

I attach a screenshot of the M0 / R0 corner of the binary IO screen showing the problem.
Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 15:43, Tuesday 13 February 2018 (40518)CDS
Opened corresponding FRS Ticket 9953.
filiberto.clara@LIGO.ORG - 12:50, Wednesday 14 February 2018 (40533)

This morning we looked at the electronics for the SUS test/coil enable readback for ETMY R0 F2 OSEM. Alog 40517 reports readback stuck in OFF state. We verified test/coil bit is switching inside the coil driver but the readback status change is not being captured by the binary card inside the IO chassis. Plan is to power cycle IO chassis. If error does not clear, binary card inside the IO chassis will need to be replaced.

F. Clara, R. McCarthy

H1 CDS (DAQ)
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:06, Tuesday 13 February 2018 - last comment - 16:50, Tuesday 13 February 2018(40516)
CDS maintenace summary

Power cycle h1oaf0 in attempt to fix h1oaf overrun issue.

h1oaf0 was power cycled. The sequence was: kill models, take h1oaf0 out of the Dolphin fabric, power down cpu, power up cpu.

Note: no software was changed, no modified filter files were loaded.

The only restart issue was a brief IRIG-B negative excursion for h1iopoaf0, which invalidated the DAQ data and IPC channels for about 5 minutes.

Unfortunately, this does not fixed the h1oaf0 overrun problem (which started when h1ngn was decommissioned).

DAQ Restart

The DAQ restart was to:

use the latest H1EDCU_HEPIPUMPEX.ini

use a new H1EDCU_SEISMON.ini which I created from the new 6-eq_event code.

WP7346 Vacuum Alarms Reconfiguration

Chandra, Dave:

The cell phone alarm system was reconfigured to:

remove CP4 LN2 pump level alarms (value and error channels) from the system

increase CP4's vacuum gauge alarm level from 1.0e-07 to 5.0e-05 Torr.

The removal of CP4 LN2 pump data has impacted on the daily CP reports, which will require a code change later today.

 

Comments related to this report
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - 16:50, Tuesday 13 February 2018 (40522)

2018_02_13 09:42 h1iopoaf0
2018_02_13 09:42 h1pemcs
2018_02_13 09:44 h1calcs
2018_02_13 09:44 h1iopoaf0
2018_02_13 09:44 h1oaf
2018_02_13 09:44 h1odcmaster
2018_02_13 09:44 h1pemcs
2018_02_13 09:44 h1susprocpi
2018_02_13 09:44 h1tcscs
2018_02_13 11:56 h1dc0
2018_02_13 11:56 h1nds1
2018_02_13 11:58 h1broadcast0
2018_02_13 11:58 h1fw0
2018_02_13 11:58 h1fw1
2018_02_13 11:58 h1fw2
2018_02_13 11:58 h1nds0
2018_02_13 11:58 h1tw1

 

LHO VE
chandra.romel@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:35, Tuesday 13 February 2018 - last comment - 16:30, Tuesday 13 February 2018(40514)
CP4 progress

This morning at 9:20am local I reduced CP4's LLCV setting to 0% open to cut off LN2 flow into pump reservoir. Kyle connected the HAM 6 backing cart with safety valve to CP4's turbo and will valve in turbo this morning before the pump warms up too much. Currently CP4 is at 58% full. Dave B. readjusted text/email alarms.

Mark D. is removing insulation from GN2 lines - sections that fall within bake inclosure.

Ken is removing electrical conduit, wiring, and supports and will continue this work throughout the week.

Kyle and Gerardo are stripping GV 11,12 of its wiring, controllers, annulus piping, etc.

I'm working with bake enclosure contractor on last minute "gotchas."

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
chandra.romel@LIGO.ORG - 16:16, Tuesday 13 February 2018 (40519)

Rather than make Kyle work the graveyard shift, I've programmed the set point of CP4 to 20% full with some flow in the transfer line. Ideally we want the pump to dry out during the day when we're in 'work mode' to monitor the turbo-scroll throughput. Reservoir is currently 45% full. Linearally extrapolating yields ~5 hrs duration to fall from 20% to 0%.

The crew made excellent progress today stripping away external components.

We valved out the small ion pump connected to the bottom of CP4. 

AIP is still pumping on GV12 due to leaky gate annulus and a pump cart is connected and running (valved out) in case of emergency.

chandra.romel@LIGO.ORG - 16:30, Tuesday 13 February 2018 (40520)

CP4 will fall to 20% full at around 11 pm tonight (if linear) but will likely happen faster.

H1 SUS
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:44, Monday 12 February 2018 - last comment - 09:28, Wednesday 14 February 2018(40509)
H1SUSETMY Newly, Fully Suspended Test Mass Fiber Violin Modes Mostly Measured
J. Kissel, T. Sadecki

Travis and I used a HeNe Laser, QPD, and speaker array to begin characterizing H1SUSETMY's PUM-to-TST fused silica fiber violin modes. We were able to complete the characterization of 3 of the 4 fibers, but we began to have (we believe to be) electronics problems during characterization of the last fiber, so we've left the set turned off but otherwise as is, in hopes the the gremlins will go away by tomorrow morning to characterize the final fiber.

I've exported the data, and intent to process it in detail as I've done for ITMX (see LHO aLOG 39163), but for now preliminary results are as follows (under the "Answer" column):

Freq resolution 62.5mHz
(400 lines with 25 Hz span)

+X / +Y (S1400157; Partial Suspended Fundamental: 504.5 Hz)

	Freq Band / Hz	Answer / Hz	nAvgs	Exc Amp / mV		FileName
1st 	490 515		504.8 		10 	250 		0003
2nd 	990 1015	999.8125	10	250 		0004
3rd	1460 1485	1471.3125	10	250		0005
4th	1975 2000	1980		10	250	        0006
5th	2450 2475	2460.3125	10	500 		0007
6th	2925 2950	2939.625	10	500 		0008

-X / +Y (S1400159; Partially Suspended Fundamental: 503.0 Hz)

1st	490 515		503.625		10	500		0009
2nd	990 1015	1000.3125	10	500		0010
3rd	1460 1485	1470.375	10	500		0011		
4th	1975 2000	1979.4375	10	500		0012
5th	2450 2475	2459.4375	10	500		0013
6th	2925 2950	2939.375	10	500		0014

+X / -Y  (S1800486; Partially Suspended Fundamental: 513.25 Hz)

1st	500 525		512.75		10	500		0015
2nd	1000 1025	1016.8125	10	500		0016	
3rd	1490 1515	1500.375	10	500		0017
4th	1975 2000	1979.5625	10	500		0018
5th	2450 2475	2459.375	10	500		0019
6th	2925 2950	2939.3125	10	500		0020


So far, the difference between fully suspended and partially suspended values look consistent with the ~0.5 Hz shift down in frequency as seen on ITMX.

Note, we tried upgrading the HeNe laser to a spare fiber-coupled optical lever laser as requested by Angus in LHO aLOG 40300, but the output coupler we were given collimated the beam to much larger than we needed (a ~10mm beam for a ~3mm QPD). Also, we were seeing a large amount of glitch-like impulses while taking the ASD of the QPD SUM output. A scope, time-series reading of the QPD output showed no glitching at any time scale. Suspecting the new laser, we tried out the old, supposedly noisy one. Simultaneously, I found that the SR785 input settings were DC coupled, and switched to A-B with AC coupling. Either the laser swap or the AC coupling fixed the problem, but since we were on a roll, we didn't switch back to the new spare optical lever laser. All of today's measurements were taken with the old HeNe laser.
Comments related to this report
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 09:28, Wednesday 14 February 2018 (40525)
I've fully processed the data, and I'm sad to say that this data set us much more poor than what we got for ITMX (LHO aLOG 39163).

(1) With all of the electronics problems, and the lack of outside-world wifi at the end stations, we couldn't look at ITMX's results results during the measurement, and I ended up chasing features of the electronics above the 3rd harmonic. In other words, the frequencies of the ~2kHz and above modes are junk. Don't trust them.

(2) We didn't spend the time to characterize the partially suspended violin mode fibers beyond the fundamental, so the comparison between partially suspended and fully suspended is not as complete.

Attached are the same plots as before however, just for consistency.

Below is the completed table -- to the best we can -- for the fully suspended, in-air violin mode measurements.

Fiber       S/N         Harmonic     Partially      Fully       df (F-P)
+X / +Y     S1400157    1st          504.5          504.81       +0.31
                        2nd          No Data        999.81       n/a
                        3rd          No Data       1471.31       n/a

-X / +Y     S1400159    1st          503.0          503.63       +0.63
                        2nd          No Data       1000.19       n/a
                        3rd          No Data       1470.38       n/a

+X / -Y     S1800486    1st          513.25         512.75       -0.50
                        2nd          No Data       1016.75       n/a
                        3rd          No Data       1500.31       n/a

-X / -Y     S1800491    1st          510.5          509.88       -0.63
                        2nd          No Data       1008.69       n/a
                        3rd          No Data       1492.31       n/a

Please note I state in the above entry that "So far, the difference between fully suspended and partially suspended values look consistent with the ~0.5 Hz shift down in frequency as seen on ITMX." From the table in this entry, it is obvious this is incorrect, and some skew up and others skew down in frequency.
Non-image files attached to this comment
Displaying reports 45441-45460 of 84840.Go to page Start 2269 2270 2271 2272 2273 2274 2275 2276 2277 End