Displaying reports 441-460 of 86983.Go to page Start 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 End
Reports until 12:04, Monday 09 February 2026
X1 SUS
ibrahim.abouelfettouh@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:04, Monday 09 February 2026 - last comment - 15:10, Monday 02 March 2026(89087)
BBSS Put in Can

Randy, Ibrahim

Randy and I put the BBSS in the can today, as shown by pictures.

Following LLO's advice from their experiences in alog 79950, we were able to use the aluma lift to can the BBSS. What we did in order:

1. Strip locked-mass BBSS of all cables, check for looseness, bring alum-a-lift into position to lift BBSS from lifitng bars

2. Undo dog clamps to let lift take suspension load, ensure suspension is secured on the lift. Move BBSS out of test stand - as LLO said, very small clearance.

3. Prepare temporary platform for lift fork adjustment

4. Set BBSS on temporary platform - this part was successful but needed extra blocks to avoid interference with Y-bracks on the Lower Structure.

5. Adjust forks to be allow for canning without bottoming out, relift.

6. Put into wiped-down can and check for looseness. Rewipe, check for particulate and ensure secure fit

7. Close doors.

See pictures below.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 09:32, Thursday 12 February 2026 (89132)EPO

EPO taggin'.  

ibrahim.abouelfettouh@LIGO.ORG - 15:10, Monday 02 March 2026 (89323)

Ibrahim, Randy

Randy and I opened the can to:

  • Take out BRDs - were left in but best to remove during the move to OSB and craning since they're somewhat fragile and can swing.
  • Insert D2300392 Transport Pads under Dummy - for safety during big move
  • Insert brackets to secure attachment between transport plate (attached to Lower Structure) and can.

See pictures below for each and another overall image.

We then buttoned the BBSS and tightened all screws. It is now ready for transport.

Images attached to this comment
H1 PSL
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:26, Monday 09 February 2026 (89086)
PSL 10-Day Trends

FAMIS 31124

FSS has been on and off over the past week and the PZT has been swept several times for JAC install work, but otherwise not much to report this week.

Images attached to this report
LHO VE
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:16, Monday 09 February 2026 (89085)
Mon CP1 Fill

Mon Feb 09 10:10:47 2026 INFO: Fill completed in 10min 44secs

 

Images attached to this report
H1 SEI (SEI)
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:12, Monday 09 February 2026 (89082)
H1 ISI CPS Noise Spectra Check - Weekly (FAMIS #39337)

FAMIS Link:  39337

Only CPS channels which look higher at high frequencies (see attached) would be the following:

  1. ETMx_ST1 H1
  2. ETMx_ST1 H2
  3. ETMy_ST1 H2
  4. ETMy_ST2 H1

In the bash window we get this note:

"HAM high freq noise is elevated for these sensor(s)!!!:       HAM1_CPSINF_V2  &  V3 "

H1 CDS
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:49, Monday 09 February 2026 (89081)
mains minor power glitch 06:49:45

The GC UPS reported a brief switch to battery power this morning due to a minor glitch in power on all three phases. The MSR UPS did not report.

Images attached to this report
LHO General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:41, Monday 09 February 2026 - last comment - 08:49, Monday 09 February 2026(89079)
Mon Day Ops Transition

TITLE: 02/09 Day Shift: 1530-0030 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
OUTGOING OPERATOR: None
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: MAINTENANCE
    Wind: 6mph Gusts, 4mph 3min avg
    Primary useism: 0.03 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.34 μm/s 
QUICK SUMMARY:

HAM7 not pumped down.  HAM1 JAC work continues. LVEA is in the Bifurcated Laser SAFE state. And Seahawks are Super Bowl Champs!

Comments related to this report
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 08:49, Monday 09 February 2026 (89083)

Coordination Meeting Notes:

  • HAM7:  VAC team look at viewports, and then pump down today.
  • Ion Pump swaps continue this week
  • HAM1:  This will go into next week (they have a meeting on this work later this morning
  • Cable pulling in lvea (OPS/SEI be mindful of HEPI status)---> ISI damped HEPI offline
  • Ops EVE shifts CANCELED this week and will revisit Feb17 Week Ops EVE shift status.
LHO VE (VE)
gerardo.moreno@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:40, Sunday 08 February 2026 - last comment - 17:24, Friday 13 February 2026(89078)
HAM3 Annulus Ion Pump Replacement

(Jordan V., Gerardo M.)

-Late entry

On Friday we removed and replaced the ion pump for HAM3.  We replaced the copper gasket twice, the first gasket seal had a bad leak, it was hard to see the mating surfaces due to visibility issues (laser safety goggles and not enough light).
After installing a second gasket, we started pumping down the annulus system and pressure went down fast.  Last pressure reading at the aux-cart was 4.63x10^-05 Torr.
BTW, we have other 4 (four) ion pumps to replace.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 09:23, Thursday 12 February 2026 (89129)EPO

EPO taggin'.

gerardo.moreno@LIGO.ORG - 17:24, Friday 13 February 2026 (89151)VE

(Jordan V., Gerardo M.)

After a couple of days of "assisted" pumping, the annulus system isolation valve was closed.  After a day of solo pumping the ion pump was able to maintain the annulus pressure at nominal.  Now the aux-cart, can turbo and hoses were removed, pressure looks good.

Images attached to this comment
LHO VE
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:37, Sunday 08 February 2026 (89077)
Sun CP1 Fill

Sun Feb 08 10:11:56 2026 INFO: Fill completed in 11min 52secs

 

Images attached to this report
LHO VE
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:34, Saturday 07 February 2026 (89074)
Sat CP1 Fill

Sat Feb 07 10:09:46 2026 INFO: Fill completed in 9min 42secs

 

Images attached to this report
H1 IOO (IOO)
masayuki.nakano@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:56, Friday 06 February 2026 - last comment - 09:23, Monday 09 February 2026(89073)
Vertical splited beam investigation

Summary of investigation into the vertically split beam from the EOM

 

Comments related to this report
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - 15:25, Saturday 07 February 2026 (89075)ISC, SYS

Horizontal beam position offset on the EOM input and output aperture on the side plates.

We realized that the nominal beam position on the EOM input and output aperture is NOT centered on the crystal cross section projected onto the side plate face, the beam is horizontally offset in +Y direction.

Look at the first cartoon (cartoon.jpg) and references therein. The beam spot offsets are 0.91mm on the input side plate and 0.54mm on the output side plate, respectively, assuming that the beam deflection angle per surface of EOM is 2.35 degrees as implied in D2500130.

0.91mm is not a small offset, it's almost 1/4 of the crystal thickness (it's 4x4x40mm).

This means that the beam should be (see nominal_sideplate.png, note that the drawing scale of the input aperture in this is twice that of the output aperture):

~3.9mm from the left (+Y) edge of the visual alignment aid notch on the input side plate,

~3.2mm from the right (again +Y) edge of the aperture hole on the output side plate.

Measurements, adjustments and measurements made the beam closer to the nominal location.

Based on the above knowledge, we took pictures of the beam position on the input/output aperture, paying attention to the errors that could arise from the parallax (which is unavoidable), i.e. the sensor card should be as close to the face of the side plate as possible and the beam spot on the sensor card should be as close to the sentor of the camera sensor as possible. This was a tougher job than you think.

Anyway, in the first round of measurements, we convinced ourselves that the beam was:

off in -Y direction by 0.7mm relative to the nominal beam position on the input plate of the EOM,

off in +Y direction by 0.5mm on the output,

give or take 0.2mm or so (the error is based on two pictures for the input beam position with random variation in parallax coming from camera position and the distance between the side plate surface and the viewer card).

We rotated the entire EOM base by using two dog clamps against the EOM base and inserting appropriate shims (EOM_rotation.png). We didn't use the YAW adjustment feature for the EOM pivot plate because there's no way to rotate it in a  controlled manner.

After the first adjustment we thought that the beam coming out of the EOM looked better (which might have been false). On the second adjustment the beam looked the same or slightly worse (which might have been false) and we reverted back to the same position as the first adjustment.

According to the pictures (input_measured.jpg and output_measured.jpg), the beam position is 
0.2mm off in -Y direction on the input,
0.6mm off in -Y direction on the output,
again give or take 0.2mm or so. Apparently the input got much better, we overshot for the output but it's not worse.
 
This is the last measurement done based on the pictures. After this, we reset the dog clamps without shims and used them as the YAW reference.
Images attached to this comment
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - 15:55, Saturday 07 February 2026 (89076)INS, ISC, SYS

Multiple beams mostly in PIT coming out of EOM (pictures and history)

1W into HAM1, otherwise it's hard to photograph these clearly.

The first picture is right after the YAW adjustment was made but before adjusting PIT. The card is held just ABOVE the main beam, you can see four blobs that look like some kind of ghost beams. (If you try to picture the main beam, it's so bright these ghosts become hard to capture.)

The second picture is after the first PIT adjustment. You can only see maybe two blobs, but later we found that the rest went below the main beam (sorry no "below" picture).

So, to recap the history of the beam quality,

  1. Feb/03-04 (alog 89041).
    • The beam had horisontal line that was clearly visible even at 100mW input (horizontalstreak.jpg).
    • JAC beam was found to be higher than 1mm relative to the EOM, the latter was raised, the horizontal line was gone but I noted "but there was still a vertical streak that was hard to photograph".
    • Then the EOM was adjusted in YAW, I still noted "not sure if it's great though, it's hard to photograph but something faint might be coming out of the EOM". But note that the power was 100mW.
  2. Feb/05 (alog 89059)
    • With 1W input, Jason and Masayuki clearly saw multiple ghost beams in PIT above the main beam.
  3. Feb/06 (this alog)
    • EOM was adjusted in YAW, seemingly no change i.e.there were still multiple ghost beams in PIT.
    • Adjusting the EOM PIT angle made ghost beams go up and down relative to the main beam, but they didn't seem to go away.

Other things.

Just to make sure, we turned down the 9MHz and 45MHz RF power to 3dBm and disconnected the 118MHz and 24MHz cables and nothing changed.

We know that the crystal wedge is supposed to be horizontal and we know that the wedge orientation is correct. When we first installed the EOM in chamber, the EOM transmission was deflected horizontally in +Y direction.

Images attached to this comment
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - 09:23, Monday 09 February 2026 (89084)

Curoius thing about the EOM dimensions

Crystal length L=40mm, thickness T=4mm=L/10, wedge angle w=2.85 deg, and tan(2w) = 0.09981 ~ 1/10.  

Though this is probably not related to the ghost beams in PIT direction, when the beam is perfectly aligned with the EOM (i.e. the light traveling the center of the crystal), the internal AR reflection of at the output face of the crystal hits the side of the crystal and the specular reflection will hit the input surface of the crystal and almost exactly comes back on top of the main beam with only 0.0272mm offset. See the 1st cartoon.

Note that the side surfaces are not polished (though the AOI is 84.3 deg so most of the power is reflected back into the crystal due to total internal reflection).

If you displace the beam in horizontal direction, the AR path is displaced in the opposite direction by about the same amount (i.e. if the main beam moves by 0.5mm toward the short face of the crystal, the AR-side-AR beam moves by about 0.5mm toward the long face). If you continue tracing the AR-side-AR beam, it turns out that the AR-side-AR-AR-side-AR beam will come back exactly on the main beam. See the 2nd cartoon (which is actually to scale, the main beam is off by 0.5mm and the 1st ghost is off by 0.5272 in the opposite direction, and the 2nd ghost is on top of the main beam).

Interesting design choice.

Images attached to this comment
LHO General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:45, Friday 06 February 2026 (89063)
Fri Ops DAY Shift Summary

TITLE: 02/06 Day Shift: 1530-0030 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
INCOMING OPERATOR: None
Super Bowl Weekend SHIFT SUMMARY:

JAC team continued with JAC alignment work in HAM1.  HAM3 AIP was swapped & started pumping over the weekend. 

(Go Seahawks!)

LOG:

 

H1 PSL
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:44, Friday 06 February 2026 (89072)
PSL Cooling Water pH Test - Monthly

FAMIS 28229

pH of PSL chiller water was measured to be between 10.0 and 10.5 according to the color of the test strip.

H1 SQZ (SQZ)
karmeng.kwan@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:11, Friday 06 February 2026 - last comment - 14:41, Friday 06 February 2026(89069)
HAM7 BL2 clipping model

From the previous alog post, Sheila measured a power drop across BL2 lens.

Here I modeled the loss of the 700um beam waist across the 2.5mm BL2 lens aperture.

The expression for the transmitted power obtained by modifying the Gaussian beam equation to include a displacement d= dx2 + dyis shown here.

And here's the contour plot for the loss (1-T) across the lens aperture for a beam transversing across various spots on the lens.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
karmeng.kwan@LIGO.ORG - 14:41, Friday 06 February 2026 (89070)

Me and Sheila are checking on the geometry of the setup.

The BM3 mirror mount IXM100.2 has a 100 pitch screw adjustment ( correspond to 100 turn per inch translation), and the beam appeared to be clipped symmetrically for 1/8 rev. For the mirror mount of 1.87" width, this correspond to a mirror rotation of 1.3mrad.

The distance between BM3 and BL2 is 148mm, from the mirror rotation, the IR beam angular deflection is 2.6mrad, this implies an aperture size of 0.4mm. Something is not right, and it's a mystery that requires more investigation.

Images attached to this comment
H1 CDS
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:05, Friday 06 February 2026 - last comment - 15:11, Friday 06 February 2026(89067)
NDS1 restart, offload TW1 raw minute trends

WP13007

The rawminute trend copy to permanent archive completed 04feb2026. Today I reconfigured NDS1 to serve these data from their permanent archival location and started the deletion of the files from TW1.

NDS1 was restarted at 12:51 for the new configuration.

Comments related to this report
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - 15:11, Friday 06 February 2026 (89071)

Deletion of last 6 months of raw minute trend files took 1hr56min. Disk usage reduced from 93% to 2%.

H1 SQZ (SQZ)
daniel.desantis@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:19, Monday 15 December 2025 - last comment - 13:51, Monday 09 February 2026(88515)
Recabling OPO in HAM7

[Sheila, Eric, Jim, Kar Meng, Daniel D.]

When we started working this morning, the particle counts were 20/10/10 per cubic foot

It looked like the old cable for the PZT that needs to be replaced was routed to back into the chamber to a cable bracket which was far from reach. Before we can remove it, we need to find the cable harness plan for HAM7.

In the mean time, we were able to re-route the TEC cable using photos from this alog

### Broke for lunch ###

Over lunch, we determined the correct connector for the PZT/translation stage was on CB5 in HAM7. It's labeled cable #4 according to the wiring diagram. We also verified the correct operation of the TEC controller and the oven from CDS

After we returned, the particle counts were 0/0/0 per cubic foot and we uncovered the chamber to finish replacing the cables.

Unfortunately, cable #4 between CB5 (see image) and the OPO is terminated in a male molded connector, which is screwed into the connector bracket. This meant that we needed to remove the female cable (from the flange) from the rear of the connector and then remove the male connector (to OPO) from the cable bracket. Jim came in to help us reach the connector and he decided that it would be easier to remove the top and second-from-top connectors (3rd and 4th on CB5 in the wiring plan) from the bracket to make it easier to reach the ones for cable #4. Jim was able to remove the old cable and replace it with the new one in the bracket.

After Jim left, we were able to continue reinstalling the new cable. The longest DB-9 tentacle on the new cable is for the VOPO PZTs, the DB-15 is for the stage control, and the short DB-9 is a spare which was coiled to the side. We were then able to connect the piezo and stage control connectors to the OPO and roughly re-route the cabling on the ISI table. Final routing and securing of these new cables/checking for mistakes is still required.

 

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - 13:51, Monday 09 February 2026 (89089)

Cable removed was D1700438-V2-00-S2101231

Displaying reports 441-460 of 86983.Go to page Start 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 End