model restarts logged for Wed 24/May/2017
2017_05_24 13:04 h1ecatx1
Restart of EX Beckhoff slow controls PLCs in attempt to clear an error (did not clear the error)
model restarts logged for Tue 23/May/2017
2017_05_23 09:57 h1iopseih23
2017_05_23 09:59 h1hpiham2
2017_05_23 09:59 h1hpiham3
2017_05_23 09:59 h1isiham2
2017_05_23 09:59 h1isiham3
Restart of all models on h1seih23 after timing glitch in CER.
After the initial work on installing the air bleed in the cooling circuit, the flow rate in head 3 was lower than it was before. There is no reason why the air bleed should affect things. All the other heads are the same as previously. I lifted the lid off the oscillator and looked at the turbine sensor. Nothing unusual was seen. I tapped the flow sensor to see if it might dislodge anything stuck inside but the flow rate did not change. The reduced output power of the laser is real. I checked the alignment of the monitoring photodiode that is located near the diagnostic breadboard and it appeared more or less okay. I also checked the iris underneath the IO periscope. The beam appeared to be off there too. Unfortunately there are no other irises earlier in the beam bath, so it not easy to tell where exactly the beam may be off centre.
TITLE: 05/25 Day Shift: 15:00-23:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Environment
OUTGOING OPERATOR: N/A
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
Wind: Calm
Primary useism:~ .01um/s
Secondary useism: ~.2um/s
QUICK SUMMARY: ops lazy script isn't doing transition (-t).
Based on my HAM2 install pictures of the IMC Trans beam in vacuum steering mirror (ROM RH2), it’s position is closer to the blue oval (that represents the front of the optic) in the attached diagram, than the location of the mirror in the DCC drawing.
The beam shift in yaw of -7mm on IM1 has also translated the beam on ROM RH2, and it’s my belief that the IMC Trans beam is now clipping on the edge of that optic.
One of the things we ran into today was that the ALS laser had an error. One of the diode currents has drifted outside of the tolerance, which caused an error. (Trends coming tomorrow).
So, we should do an update of the beckhoff code sometime soon. We had not encountered this problem before because we haven't had any errors from the laser head before.
Corresponds to FRS Ticket 8217. See also LHO aLOG 36381.
V. Adya, J. Driggers, J. Kissel We're heading out with all DRMI ASC loops closed and DRMI relocking reliably, with the IFO breaking lock just before RESONANCE (we only tried reducing the CARM offset a few times). We'll pick up here tomorrow. We noticed Bounce and Roll Modes were quite high, so they'll likely need attention tomorrow morning. We leave the IFO locked in DRMI with ISC_LOCK guardian requested DOWN in case of earthquake. Anyone who's willing to pick up where we left off tomorrow morning is welcome, but do pay attention to Bounce and Roll modes -- they may just need some tender love and care before we go further. Great work today team!
V. Adya, J. Driggers, S. Dwyer, K. Izumi, J. Kissel, J. Warner A mid-recovery status report: After slowly working our way through initial alignment, we've been able to successfully and stably lock DRMI despite strong winds, but we're not yet at a good enough alignment for DRMI WFS to come on. No major problems from initial alignment up to this point, just gotchas really: - One needs the 2nd light-pipe open to find a green beatnote to align PR3 - One needs to turn ON the high voltage for the fast shutter to open so you can see light on WFS and run corner station initial alignment WFS - If you're starting from a post-vent fresh alignment, don't trust the SR3 cage servo reference, so turn it off. The lock acquisition sailed through ALS, and what trouble we're having with PRMI & DRMI is all just finding the right alignment for the IFO. Namely we're slowly closing each DRMI ASC loop by moving sliders to reduce error signals to where we can turn on the loops. We've gotten so far as to close all loops except for PRC1 (i.e. MICH, INP1, PRC2, SRC1, SRC2), and it's just the slow process of moving PRM by hand while the rest of the ASC system brings the optics with your moves. Slowly but surely! I attach my detailed, blow-by-blow notes for future reference, up to this point.
Aidan (remotely), Nutsinee, TJ (in spirit), Kiwamu,
The return beam of the Hartman system for ITMX (HWSX, alog 36332) was successfully found on the HWS table today after people performed the full initial alignment process once.
We then centered the HWSX return beam to the Hartman camera. We are ready to repeat the measurement of the hot spot (34853).
(some details)
We followed the procedure written in T1700101-v2.
Nutsinee and I went to the HWS table after the initial alignment had been done. First of all, looking at the Hartman beam with respect to the two irises on the table, we confirmed that the Hartman beam had stayed in a good shape. We then started checking the periscope mirrors to look for the green light down from the X arm. We immediately found the green light on the top periscope mirror. Carefully inspecting the spot position on the mirror, we determined that the beam was well centered with a precision of about 5mm or so.
We steered the top and bottom periscope mirrors to make the green light centered on both irises. Finally, we steered the steering mirror in front of the Hartman camera while watching the stream live image of the camera. We found the Hartman return beam on the stream image right away. We then touched the top periscope mirror and the steering mirror to fine-tune the beam/aperture locations.
The attached are the images after we finished aligning the return beam to the camera with and without the Hartman plate.
I later went back and put the HWSY plate back on. I attached pictures of HWSY with plate on and off.
The codes are running for both HWSX and HWSY and the reference centroids have been reinitialized.
My analysis is that the HWSX alignment is off center by 20 to 40 mm. The EQ stops appear too high in the image compared to previous alignments (for reference 100 pixels corresponds to about 21mm on the optic). I would exercise caution when analyzing the results from this alignment.
Some previous alignments can be seen here:
https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=34813
https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=28880
Kiwamu, Nutsinee
I attached HWSX screenshots after the adjustment (with HWS plate off and on). I also fixed the weird-looking HWSY image with HWS plate on. The rtd temperature sensor snapped and made room for the HWS plate to move slightly out of place. There's also a small dent where the temperature sensor was (forgot to take a picture), no damage to the hole-ly part and I screwed down the metal plates quite tightly to make sure the whole thing laid flat.
WP 6652
ERC 170062
The BRS ion pump read back signals are now tied into the vacuum rack. Field cabling from each controller was pulled to connector header H (Pins 37-40) inside the vacuum rack. The Vacuum Controls Chassis was modified to add the new read back signals to terminal 15. Channel 1 is the voltage read back and channel 2 is the pressure read back.
Controllers for the BRS ion pumps are not the same.
End Y - Gamma SPCe controller
End X - MiniVAC Controller
F. Clara, G. Moreno, R. McCarthy, P. Thomas
(Krishna V., Gerardo M.)
Information for both systems:
BRS-Y
- ion pump is a TiTan 10SW from Gamma Vacuum (PN:10SWCV2HSCNN).
- the controller is a SPCe from Gamma Vacuum (PN:SPC1PS1U1ESNA).
- for the high voltage connection the system uses a SAFECONN type of cable/connectors.
- HV polarity is + (positive)
BRS-X
- ion pump is an old Varian 10 l/s pump.
- the controller is a MiniVac from Varian (PN:EX9290191)
- for the high voltage connection the system uses a FISHER type of cable/connectors.
- HV polarity is - (negative)
Following the installation of the OS and HWS_CODE on the H1HWSMSR1 computer for HWSY we found we couldn't get the HWS code to run properly. It turned out that the new computer had an old BASHRC file (where the environment variables for the HWS code are defined). I fixed this by duplicating the BASHRC file from H1HWSMSR. I've attached it below.
The two computers are identical in all respects but one. Due to the way the HWS code currently runs, each computer creates EPICS channels for ITMX and ITMY. In order to avoid duplicate channels messing up EPICS, I've made the following two changes:
On H1HWSMSR (the HWSX computer) in .bashrc:
export OPTIC0=ITMY0_HWS
a fake ITMY0 channel is created
On H1HWSMSR1 (the HWSY computer) in .bashrc:
export OPTIC1=ITMX0_HWS
a fake ITMX0 channel is created
I valved-in the running pump cart to the HAM11/HAM12 annulus volume for a few hours today. The HAM11 controller had went off scale high some time ago for no good reason as both the pump and the controller have low hours. It stayed off scale even while being assisted by the pump cart so I "assisted" the pump body with a few impacts (tough love) at which point it recovered and stayed on scale. 1615 hrs. local -> I valved-out the pump cart. We'll see if it has "learned its lesson".
Peter K., & Jeff B. This morning we replaced the leaking ball valve assembly reported in aLOG #36343. A last check of the new assembly, just before opening the GVs, showed no leaks. Will take a look at it during the next window to verify all is well.
J. Driggers, K. Izumi, S. Dwyer, J. Kissel, V. Adya, T. Shaffer We've been able to find green alignment quite easily. Yes!! However, once we were able to get ALS X well aligned and locked, with Green WFS and ITM camera alignment systems ON -- the ALS X Beckhoff state machine turned into a blinking MEDM light show. The arm would remain locked, with good alignment, the ALSX guardian would go into fault. The obvious symptoms were several momentary errors on the (from the ALS Overview Screen) Beckhoff screens for PDH, Fiber PLL, and VCO that each complained of each other. We started with slow calculated attempts of trying to disable various parts of the state machine, e.g. - using H1:ALS-X_FIBR_LOCK_LOGIC_FORCE to force the fiber PLL lock, or - by hitting reset (H1:ALS-X_VCO_CONTROLS_CLEARINT) on the H1:ALS-X_VCO_TUNEOFS to reset the frequency finding servo. we then degraded to a bit of button mashing, after which the state machine would just restore everything to what it was before we started. Finally, Sheila showed us how to dig down an alternate path for finding errors via the sitemap > SYS > EtherCAT overview and follow the error messages from there. However the screens only show explanatory text when there are errors present, which makes tracing a momentary error frustrating at best. Our path down this rabbit hole was sitemap > SYS > EtherCAT overview > ECAT_CUST_SYSTEM.adl X-End PLC2 (because it showed a text "ALS-X; ISC-EX") > H1_X1PLC2.adl Als (which had no text) > H1ALS_X1_PLC2.adl X (had no text) > H1ALS_X1_PLC2_X.adl Potential BUG: On this screen the "Lock" and "Refl" were showing constant errors but "Laser" ended up being the problem Laser (maybe showed only momentary text) > H1ALS_X1PLC2_X_LASER.adl Head > H1ALS_X1_PLC2_X_LASER_HEAD.adl After careful scrutiny of this screen we found that the ALS-X laser diode 2's powr monitor H1:ALS-X_LASER_HEAD_LASERDIODE2POWERMONITOR was bouncing between 2.038 and 2.039, with is just hovering along the edge of the user defined tolerance of H1:ALS-X_LASER_HEAD_LASERDIODEPOWERTOLERANCE == 0.2 from the user-defined nominal H1:ALS-X_LASER_HEAD_LASERDIODEPOWERNOMINAL == 1.842 After increasing the threshold on deviations from the nominal from 0.2 to 0.5, the entire state machine became happy and normal. This is a problem we'd never seen before, but upon further inspection while writing this log (because we found it hard to believe that laser diodes would produce *more* power than before), I took a look at the 15 day trend of this laser power vs. the X VEA temperature (as measured by the PCAL Receiver's Temperature Sensor), and indeed, the laser power follows it nicely. We should be prepared for the HVAC upgrade to be impacting a lot more than just suspension alignments (LHO aLOG 36331). Lesson Learned The state machine for the ALS system is really hard to debug when there are momentary errors. - We should change the beckhoff error reporting to be latching - We should change these automatically generated screens to *always* display text, so that one can navigate around them with comfort - There may actually be a bug in the reporting system
Inspecting the TwinCAT code for the laser head indeed revealed a mistake when calling the error handler: the list of error messages was never passed down which in turn prevents the bits from "lightening up."
Open FRS Ticket 8217.
(This concludes WP #6644) Kyle RGA scans were taken this morning followed by the spinning down of the Vertex, YBM and XBM MTPs (main turbo pumps), isolating the scroll fore line and stopping the scroll pumps, "burping" GV5 and GV7's gate annulus volumes into the adjacent ion-pumped annulus volumes and then opening GV5 and GV7. Note: GV5's gate separated without a fuss but approximately 3/4 of the way into its "open" stroke it came to a halt with a "clunk" confirmed by a stoppage of audible displaced air out of the electro-pneumatic selector manifold . I assumed that it was at the mechanical stop but CDS was indicating a "yellow" field. After a minute or so of contemplation, and on its own, it resumed stroking to the mechanical stop. GV5 has always been worrisome but seems to be getting worse with use. GV7 behaved weird as well in that the gate seemed to separate as usual and CDS transitioned to "yellow" but the adjacent vacuum pressures indicated no gate separation. With additional increase in pneumatic air pressure the vacuum pressures finally responded but the displaced air out of the electro-pneumatic selector manifold was barely audible during the stroking. Even with 55 psi applied, it took noticeably longer than normal for it to open. This is consistent with the "dribble' of displaced air. I did note that the red light showing which side of the piston the instrument-air was being applied to was not illuminated. I don't know if this is a new problem or if the bulb has been burned out for a while????
John and I struggled trying to hard close GV 5 last week. While it was in soft closed position (with ~15-20 psi), I ramped up to the 80 psi limit and waited many minutes - no change. We reopened the valve slightly and closed again to re-seat it. It then hard closed at 40 psi.
Vern S. asked that I post these scans so as to make them available for review to all who are interested prior to opening GV5 and GV7. So, here they are. h0rgacs_SEM_analog_05242017a is a scan of the combined Vertex+YBM+XBM volumes while they are being pumped via IPs1-6. Note that, for this scan, I am running 1mA filament current and 1300V SEM voltage. For scan h0rgacs_SEM_05242017b I reverted the settings back the Quadera default of 2mA filament current and 1500V SEM voltage. I think that the scans that Chandra R. had taken prior to this vent exercise had used the as found Quadera default settings. As such, if you are comparing "before" to "after" scans, you will want to use h0rgacs_SEM_05242017b.
I forgot to mention that PT120 was indicating 6.1 x 10-8 torr at the time of these scans and that everything is/was in temperature and pressure equilibrium etc...
For comparison, the partial pressure of water is x20 higher in today's h0rgacs_SEM_analog_05242017b scan than that of the comparable scan taken just before venting. This is the "price" of opening early!
I used 1300 V (and default 2 mA).
Subbing for TJ