Peter and Jason have brought the PSL back. I have run an initial alignment. I just got stopped in VIOLIN_MODE_DAMPING_1 by an ezca connection error to H1:SUS-ITMX_L2_DAMP_MODE7_SW2R (see attached). I tried reloading the code but the error persists. I can connect to the channel with caget from zotws3 (as myself) and from h1guardian1 (as controls).
It seems that I have managed to fix it by following the suggestion in the log and taking ISC_LOCK to STOP and then EXEC. It seemed to get stuck at PAUSE so I re-requested EXEC and it then went to EXEC. I then requested DC_READOUT and it made it to that. I noticed the attached 'invalid value encountered in divide' error go by.
The laser tripped this afternoon because the flow rate through the heads went to zero or fell below its trip point. As noted in this alog the flow rates took a dive over the weekend and did not return to their previous values. Upon restarting the crystal chiller, the flow rates were stuck around 0.3 lpm. Since all four heads were affected, the pressure regulator in that part of the cooling circuit was exercised as the bypass valve was varied. At some point the flow rates returned to ~0.5 lpm, so we suspect that there's a problem with the regulator. Beyond a certain point, the pressure did not increase as the regulator was steadily being closed. The same is true for the regulator in the amplifier circuit. The laser has been restarted but the flow rates will have to be monitored. Jason / Peter
Paul, Dave:
reference Cheryl's alog from Monday evening, 3rd July and Paul's alog from today.
If the psinject (continuous wave calibration) process on h1hwinj1 dies, the monit system on that computer restarts the process. It had been found that a sudden restart of the excitation could cause issues (loss of lock?) and so additional code was added in 2015 to slowly ramp up the CW injection signal on startup (and slowly ramp it down on shutdown).
Full details of the restart procedure are in this alog. To summarize; the gain is zeroed, psinject is started, after a 2 minute wait the gain is set back to unity over a ten second ramp. The GAIN and TRAMP channels were being monitored by h1calex SDF, which meant that the DIAG_SDF guardian node took H1 out of observation when differences were reported.
Given the rarity of a psinject crash/restart, we could continue to monitor the GAIN channel as a precaution against accidental change of the CW calibration amplitude. Perhaps we should go further and change the DIAG_EXC guardian node to take H1 out of observation if the h1calex excitation is missing (currently it is being ignored). Looking at the Verbal Alarms code I'm not sure a verbal alert is raised when psinject crashes, if this is the case we should activate this.
TITLE: 07/10 Eve Shift: 23:00-07:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PST), all times posted in UTC STATE of H1: Earthquake OUTGOING OPERATOR: Ed CURRENT ENVIRONMENT: Wind: 7mph Gusts, 4mph 5min avg Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s Secondary useism: 0.06 μm/s QUICK SUMMARY: Laser remains off from trip. I see Jason in the PSL enclosure investigating.
TITLE: 07/10 Day Shift: 15:00-23:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Earthquake
INCOMING OPERATOR: Patrick
SHIFT SUMMARY:
LOG:
15:57 Jeff B into Diode room to power cycle dust monitor. WP 7071.
15:58 begin damping exercise - ITMX mode 10 (996.252Hz)
16:14 Jeff back
16:30 Meeting in control room to discuss WPs
16:50 Richard, Jeff and Fil working in CER and Diode room with dust monitor WP7071
19:00 Vern + guest up to observation deck
19:45 Carlos up to observation deck
19:56 Carlos back
20:09 Corey to vacuum optics lab
20:55 SVN (SDF Diff) file commitments for previously modified files.
21:42 Lockloss - PSL trip due to flow error
22:01 Jason and Peter plan to go into the enclosure to investigate that PSL trip
22:48 Thomas and Marc to MY
J. Kissel, H. Radkins, J. Warner We're continuing to attack violin modes post Montana EQ. I attach a spectrum of "our" (all Jim and Hugh) progress, where the reference (GREEN) is this morning. We can definitely see that the violin modes begin to get hefty non-linear shoulders by the time the RMS passes ~5e2 ADC counts, which is pretty surprising for a 32e4 count ADC... New modes that Hugh and Jim have now successfully cooled today: EX 1475.09 MODE7 YAW FM4(100dB), FM6(1475.09), G = -500 (This mode interacts with the "already solved" 1475.25 EX mode, so that damping must also be ON and some small level while damping this mode) IY 1472.45 MODE8 PIT FM4(100dB), FM6(1462.45), FM7(-60d1.5k) G = +1000 IY 1470.38 MODE4 PIT FM4(100dB), FM6(1470.38), G = -500 IY 1470.82 MODE5 PIT FM4(100dB), FM6(1470.82), FM7(-60d1.5k) G = +1000 As before -- these are reported for the record, but the Violin Mode Table has been updated and that should be treated as cannon not this aLOG. I've been continuing to manipulate the damping output of the problematic pair of modes at 1463.09 Hz, including - Installing narrow bandpass in all test masses, exploring the unit circle with each of the 4 test masses, and all 3 degrees of freedom (L, P, Y) - Went back to ITMX and focused energy there (since that;s what I was driving when I originally rung it up) - Adding +/- 30 [deg] filters, and spinning around the unit circle there - Broadening the band pass, in hopes of changing the relative drive phase between the two modes. After three hours of failure, I was *just* about to think I saw hints of progress driving the wide-band band pass in YAW, with FM4(100dB) and FM5(1463.09W) and +1 gain, but then we lost lock because the PSL tripped. Guh! While wasting time staring at StripTool for 3 hours, I grabbed a 0.5 [mHz] resolution spectra to confirm the violin mode table's claimed exact frequency of these modes. Unfortunately, DTT (and foton's) cursor can't resolve past 2 decimal places. But at least zooming in visually, I can confirm that the two modes are: 1463.0961 +/- 0.0005 1463.0982 +/- 0.0005 We were focused on the 1.5k modes so far today, and made no attempts at progress on the remaining high 1.0k pair of modes at 1008.45 / 1008.49 Hz.
After careful analysis of high resolution spectrums of the "pair" of modes at 1463.098 and 1463.101 Hz I think I understand why commissioners are having issues damping them. In conclusion, the two modes have swapped order after the misalignment caused by the Earthquake, If this has not been taken into consideration then the damping filters are being applied to the wrong mode.
This problem serves as justification of the importance of violin mode identification not only by mass but also by fibre.
Yesterday I commented on another alog saying that this "pair" while associated to the same mass (ITMX), they most probably were associated to different fibres (more concretely to FR and BL fibres), due to the fact that this pair was an order of magnitude closer than any other pair. A confirmation that this assumption is correct is shown next by looking at the pair of modes at 4 different times; (red) is during O1 Dec 2015, (blue) is a couple of days before the Earthquake during Observing mode, (green) is hours after the Earthquake and (purple) is about the time of the entry above.
Looking at red and blue plot we see how the change in frequency of both modes occurs in opposite direction which could not be possible if it was related to the same fibre, basically one is increasing in tension and the other one decreasing, probably due to change on suspension pitch confirming that one is a front fibre and the other one is a back fibre. Furthermore, notice the small change on frequency over 1.5 years, and the huge change caused by the Earthquake, presumably due to the considerable change in alignment caused by the Earthquake and consequent change in the fibres' tension. The Earthquake changed considerably the ground where the detector sits. But most importantly notice that the change in tension is so high that the position of the frequencies associated to the 2 modes switched such that now the lower frequency mode is actually the one that before was the higher frequency one and viceversa. If this has not been taken into consideration then the damping filters are being applied to the wrong mode, which may explain why it is getting hard to damp them.
Notice that the frequency change is once again decreasing as per the purple plot, presumably after ground relaxation after the Earthquake and mass pitch alignment going back to previous values.
Just to confirm this further I looked at spectrums (at the same times as above and same color coding) for the other two pairs of 3rd harmonic modes that have been identified as being associated to the same mass. We can see how for each pair the change in frequency takes place in same direction between them (so they are associated to the same fibre) and same ammount as above, but both pairs change frequency in opposite direction showing that these two fibres are again front and back.
First pair at modes 1456.18 and 1456.84 Hz:
Second pair at modes 1467.47 and 1467.96 Hz:
10:21 21:41UTC Jason and Peter are going into the enclosure for investigation.
Kiwamu, Daniel, (WP7066, ECR:E1700127-v1)
We modified the ASC front end model in order to accommodate lock-in oscillators which will be used for commissioning the new AS72 WFSs (37042). The conceptual design is summarized in T1700324. Additionally, we removed the parts that were for the AS90 WFSs because (A) we had not been using them and (B) we will take over the same electronics and ADCs for the AS72 WFSs. The below are the model files that were modified today:
They are checked into SVN. Note that Livingston is not using ASC_MASTER these days. The attached screenshots show the new components in the ASC model. As stated in the ECR, we are adding twelve new DQ channels as follows.
Also, we removed the following four DQ channels that needed to go out since we took out the AS90 system:
I was able to compile the model without any error messages. The model is ready to install tomorrow during the maintenance period.
The following files were commited to SVN:
There are files that are currently being modified by on site staff. They will respectfully be asked to commit their work.
There are some files that were modified by incoming operators. They will be asked to address their work as well.
Remnants of the last diode current adjustments are evident. The issues with the chiller plots is being dealt with. Everything else is ok.
Concur with Ed, except for the chiller plots everything looks normal. For more info on the chiller discrepancies see alog 37411.
FRS8255
Chandra, Dave:
The temporary high alarm leves for PT124 and PT144 was removed this morning (reduced from 5.0e-08 to the standard 5.0-e09 Torr) and the alarm system was restarted. In the process I discovered that the full alarm configurations for CP3 and CP4 were still commented out (we were using a subset). Now these cryo-pumps are fully functional, I have restored their full alarm configuration.
I've set FRS8255 into PENDING ready for close-out.
Richard, Jeff B, Dave:
the EPICS IOC which reads the diode room dust monitor was restarted, we are recording dust measurements again. The wiki page for the dustdr was found to have problems, which were corrected. Also the serial baud rate had been increased from 9600 to 19200, this change was made to the wiki page text. The startup script had an incorrect name, this was corrected.
At approximately 15:30 UTC (8:30 PDT) on Saturday, 7/8/2017, the flow through the HPO laser heads dropped by ~0.12 lpm; see the first attachment. This is worrying as the trip point for the laser head flow is set to 0.4 lpm; the flow through heads 2 and 3 is sitting at ~0.45 lpm, just 0.05 lpm above the trip point. Looking at the other channels in the cooling system the picture becomes a little clearer (maybe).
The 2nd attachment shows the pressures in the PSL cooling manifold; H1:PSL-OSC_PRESS1 is the pressure at the manifold input, H1:PSL-OSC_PRESS2 is the pressure at the manifold output. As seen in the attachment, the pressure at the inlet increased slightly, and the pressure at the outlet dropped slightly. The third attachment shows the flow through the HPO power meter circuit (H1:PSL-OSC_PWRMETERFLOW), the 35W FE laser circuit (H1:PSL-AMP_FLOW), and the overall flow out of the PSL crystal chiller (H1:PSL-OSC_XCHILFLOW); the flow out of the chiller dropped slightly (~0.1 lpm) while the flow through the HPO power meter and 35W FE circuits both increased very slightly (interestingly, the signal from the FE flow sensor cleaned up after the event, and the frequency of drops in the power meter flow sensor signal also decreased). The most likely cause of this behavior is some kind of flow restriction, probably somewhere in the laser head cooling circuit (although it is possible there could be a blockage in the filters under the PSL table).
The 4th attachment shows the temperature of the individual laser heads. All saw an increase of ~0.2 °C, which indicates that this is a real drop in the flow through the HPO laser heads. Fortunately this was not enough to effect the output power of the laser (5th attachment), and the temperatures have remained steady since the loss of flow on Saturday.
In the short term, we can try increasing the overall flow at the crystal chiller to see if it clears whatever is restricting the flow; at the very least we can increase the flow so we are a bit further from the trip point. We will also inspect the filters beneath the PSL table when we are in the enclosure during tomorrow's maintenance window. Any further investigation will require opening up the cooling system, which is highly invasive.
Filed FRS 8482.
LHO WP 7073.
I increased the flow out of the PSL crystal chiller from 21.4 lpm to 22.5 lpm. While this doesn't appear to have knocked anything loose, at the very least the lowest of the 4 laser head flows is now reading 0.5 lpm. This lessens the chance of a PSL trip due to low flow. I will leave the chiller at this flow rate until tomorrow, when we can take a closer look during the maintenance window.
J. Kissel Just posting an update on this -- the H1 PCAL Y RX PD reported displacement continues to decay, likely due to some temperature dependent clipping. This had been a part of the FRS Ticket 8328, but there's little we can do during an observation run to fix this. We've since closed the issue as LONGTERMFIX. AS such, I'll raise to an integration issue, and mark as WHEN VENT (similar to the promised work in Integration Issue 4700). For now, recall that we've switched over to using TXPD as the calibration reference (see LHO aLOG 37166).
Opened IIET Ticket 8481
I've attached my related notes on this subject, as I've been trying to draw up a history of the issue since the Fall. "Issue History.pdf" is the information I've been able to drag out of aLOGs and long time series, "Investigations.pdf" are the questions I've had and a select few I've answered. Apologies for the rambling nature, these are my personal notes. Short summary of my investigations: temperature correlation on the Rx side is quite clear but higher frequency coherences appear to be only in obvious places (other PCalY OFS and Tx channels, ETMY ISI channels) and I haven't figured out how to measure coherence for long term, slow frequency signals.
Further investigations and notes will now exist in DCC document G1701350 (see https://dcc.ligo.org/G1701350).
DQ Shifter: Alan Weinstein, Email: ajw@ligo.caltech.edu
LSC Fellow: Paul Marsh, Email: paul.mecheng@gmail.com
Full summary is here.
CW_GAIN issue resolved, see aLOG 37304.
CW GAIN issue has been resolved. The CW_GAIN and CW_TRAMP values were being monitored by Guardian, which forced the IFO out of observing when those values changed; those values were changed due to a loss of hardware injections and subsequent restart by the psinject script. Dave Barker and I have changed the gain and ramp to be unmonitored channels again. Notes attached.
Change undone after the decision was made that losing IFO lock was the desired behavior and issue was mitigated by sparse nature of psinject reset. See aLOG 37447.