Displaying reports 53781-53800 of 84788.Go to page Start 2686 2687 2688 2689 2690 2691 2692 2693 2694 End
Reports until 04:11, Sunday 27 November 2016
H1 General
nutsinee.kijbunchoo@LIGO.ORG - posted 04:11, Sunday 27 November 2016 - last comment - 05:29, Sunday 27 November 2016(31874)
Back to Nominal Low Noise and Observe

POP90 still jumped during Noise Tuning but I haven't seen a jump during NLN.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
nutsinee.kijbunchoo@LIGO.ORG - 05:29, Sunday 27 November 2016 (31875)DetChar

I moved SRM while the intent bit was set hoping it would stop the range from drifting. The range continued to drift downward during the first hour into the lock, I was afraid that it might be due to SRC1 P loop being open. I moved SRM pitch hoping that it would make things better (or slow down the drift). However, turned out I made the noise worse. I moved SRM back in pitch to where it started off at NLN and was able to improve the range a little. Because of an ongoing scheduled injection I didn't take H1 out of Observing (sorry DQ shifter, this is why I tagged you!). I also tried to move SRM yaw a little bit since it was also drifting (even with SRC1 Y loop close). The time of alignment change is 12:41-12:56 UTC and 13:09-13:12 UTC. I didn't move SRM yaw all the way back to where it started off since it seems to have become stabilized (and so was the range).

Images attached to this comment
H1 ISC
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 03:05, Sunday 27 November 2016 (31873)
not locking well tonight

We have been struggling to lock all day today.  

I think the root of the problem is that our alingment references are not giving us a good power recycling gain after inital alingment.  The soft loops bring us back to a good alignment, but it seems like our references for the green arms are off and may need to be reset in DC readout.  This means that we have had a lot of random locklosses durring the CARM offset reduction, especially durring the analog CARM transition.  We have added some extra sleeps here, since we have had more sucsess doing this step by hand.  

I zeroed the pit offset in POP A, because looking at the last 2 weeks of algnment, no pit offset gave us the best ranges, and the recycling gain was a bit better than the current -0.2 offset.  This hasn't improved the recycling gain when we first lock much, but it does reduce the amount that the recycling gain drops when we engage CHARD, which has caused a few of our locklosses today.  

We also had some bugs in the SRM_ASC high power state, which Kiwamu and I changed earlier today for the new SRM dither loop.  For now I have commented out the line where it sets the gain, this morning we used a gain of -100 if anyone wants to try turning it on by hand later. 

I think that the next step might be to lock at the alignment references (next time we reach DC readout) but don't want to start changing references now, so we will leave it for tonight.  

H1 INJ (DetChar, INJ)
adam.mullavey@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:42, Sunday 27 November 2016 - last comment - 17:46, Sunday 27 November 2016(31871)
Coherent Burst Hardware Injections

I've scheduled 9 burst injections to be injected coherently into both IFOs. They will begin at 10:10 UTC (2:10 PT) and are spaced 20 minutes apart. The IFO will need to be in observation mode for these injections to go in. Here are the relevant lines in the schedule file.

1164276617 H1L1 INJECT_BURST_ACTIVE 1 1.0 config/Burst/Waveform/ER10_LongDuration/ADI-c_9_0.2.txt

1164277817 H1L1 INJECT_BURST_ACTIVE 1 1.0 config/Burst/Waveform/ER10_LongDuration/ADI-c_13_0.6.txt

1164279017 H1L1 INJECT_BURST_ACTIVE 1 1.0 config/Burst/Waveform/ER10_LongDuration/ADI-c_20_0.99.txt

1164280217 H1L1 INJECT_BURST_ACTIVE 1 1.0 config/Burst/Waveform/ER10_LongDuration/ADI-e_12_0.4.txt

1164281417 H1L1 INJECT_BURST_ACTIVE 1 1.0 config/Burst/Waveform/ER10_LongDuration/ADI-e_16_0.9.txt

1164282617 H1L1 INJECT_BURST_ACTIVE 1 1.0 config/Burst/Waveform/ER10_LongDuration/ADI-e_20_0.9.txt

1164283817 H1L1 INJECT_BURST_ACTIVE 1 1.0 config/Burst/Waveform/ER10_ShortDuration/SG_4.0e-22_8.9_70.txt

1164285017 H1L1 INJECT_BURST_ACTIVE 1 1.0 config/Burst/Waveform/ER10_ShortDuration/SG_2.0e-22_8.9_153.txt

1164286217 H1L1 INJECT_BURST_ACTIVE 1 1.0 config/Burst/Waveform/ER10_ShortDuration/SG_2.0e-22_8.9_285.txt

The waveforms are on the hardware injection svn. The schedule file gives the path to the text files from the Details directory.

Comments related to this report
adam.mullavey@LIGO.ORG - 00:51, Sunday 27 November 2016 (31872)INJ, OpsInfo

If for some reason these injections need to be stopped, follow these instructions:

  1. On a workspace, open a terminal.
  2. Type 'guardmedm INJ_TRANS', this will open the gui for the transient injection guardian.
  3. From the request pull down menu, select INJECT_KILL
adam.mullavey@LIGO.ORG - 11:07, Sunday 27 November 2016 (31879)

Here is a link to the Burst groups ER10/O2 hardware injection plans - https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-G1601528

In the schedule file - ADI = Acretion Disk Instability, SG = Sine Gaussian.

adam.mullavey@LIGO.ORG - 17:46, Sunday 27 November 2016 (31885)INJ

At LHO, the first injection that went in was the 6th scheduled injection (ADI-e_20_0.9.txt). Unfortunately this was the only injection that went in at LHO, and the only one that was coherently injected at both sites. The remaining three injections were stopped by the guardian because there was an external trigger alert, which I'm guessing was due to the injection itself.

I've attached the relevant section of the INJ_TRANS guardian log.

Non-image files attached to this comment
H1 AOS
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:38, Sunday 27 November 2016 - last comment - 11:58, Monday 28 November 2016(31870)
ETMY V damping

For some reason a +50 degree filter was turned on in the ETMY top mass damping on October 12th, it was not good and we got no real top mass damping. Nutsinee and I just turned it off, so the settings are now the same as for ETMX.  This fixed the problem

Comments related to this report
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 11:58, Monday 28 November 2016 (31904)CDS, DetChar, ISC, SUS
J. Kissel, B. Weaver

We've investigated what we could of this, but there is no aLOG evidence that these phase adjustment filters were intended to be used in the design (what's now left is the same semi-low noise design I made a few years back: see G1300537). They also don't make any sense upon first glance individually, but after staring at the design strings and names it has slowly become clear. We can also narrow down who would attempt such sophisticated trickery without aLOGging, maintaining SDF, committing filter changes to the svn repo, or otherwise cleaning up after they're done...

There are four filters that I've now cleared/completely removed from the H1SUS ETMY M0_DAMP_V filter bank:
    FM6       BS1_4        ellip("BandStop",5,1,40,1,4)
    FM7       -90deg       zpk([-9.8],[9.8],1,"n")
    FM8       +50deg       zpk([5],[50],1,"n")
    FM9       bouncetest   ellip("BandPass",4,1,55,9.5,11)gain(45,"dB")
Guessing what the intent was by the frequencies in question it looks like someone was exploring damping the highest vertical mode (a.k.a. "*the* bounce mode") from the top mass, using top mass OSEMs as the error signal. I'm not surprised it didn't work!

Potentially related aLOGs:
Corey's midnight issue on Thanksgiving: LHO aLOG 31828
My cleanup of ODC state vector Oct 25, where I blindly accepted the new state as OK: LHO aLOG 30849

The last attachment shows a trend of the filter state. The bottom trace is merely a report of the current filter state, and the top trace shows the user-entered EPICs record that is compared against when establishing whether ODC thinks there's OK status. The bottom trace confirms Sheila's suggestion that the filter bank status was changed on Oct 12th 2016 at ~16:50 UTC (which is Oct 12 2016 09:50:00 PDT).
Images attached to this comment
LHO General
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 23:59, Saturday 26 November 2016 (31864)
Ops Eve Shift Summary

TITLE: 11/27 Eve Shift: 00:00-08:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Lock Acquisition
INCOMING OPERATOR: Nutsinee
SHIFT SUMMARY: There was one nice 2hr lock during my shift, but other than that we have been struggling to find what has been causing us to drop during various parts of acquisition. Not sure if this is some remnant of the Beckhoff problems from earlier, but we have only been locked once since then. We have gone through one initial alignment, numerous DRMIs, and some DC Readouts. Sheila is working hard and has some theories about the recycling gain, I'm sure there will be an update when there is more news. PEM is done for the night.
LOG:

LHO General
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 20:29, Saturday 26 November 2016 (31868)
Ops Mid shift report

Commissioners and the PEM crew are working when we have the IFO up, but we have had a few unknown issues causing locklosses in some of the states after DRMI making it take a bit longer to get there. Currently working to get back up to resume PEM work.

H1 ISC
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 19:36, Saturday 26 November 2016 - last comment - 00:00, Sunday 27 November 2016(31867)
SRM ASC back on dither

Sheila, Kiwamu

Since last wensday, we have had several sudden changes in SRC alingment that started in the middle of the week and have continued (31865  31849 31844 31823)   We don't know what causes this, but it only shows up in the alignment of SRM and SR2, (as well as the OMs and OMC) and it seems to be a pitch problem. 

One likely suspect is the AS36I sensing, allthough we don't have any reason to suspect it changed mid week.  We decided to try running a dither loop on SRM pitch for a few days as a test.  We changed the demodulated signal to SRCL control, which has a higher SNR than any of the build ups.  We reduce the amplitude of the dither line from 600 counts on the clock gain to 100 counts, use a gain of -100 and no 60dB filter (FM1).  We set the lock point of this loop by adjusting the P2L gain in SRM M3, which we set to -1.3 for now to get the best build ups.  

We are hoping to see if problems continue in the next few days with this on, or if there are jumps in the AS36 I signals.   We have added it to guardian but this is not tested yet. 

Comments related to this report
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - 00:00, Sunday 27 November 2016 (31869)

Is it possible that the excess motion in ITMY pitch, that was fixed last week, improved AS36I sensing in the same way that the pitch dither on SRM ASC is this week? 

Last week the excess motion in ITMY pitch was identified, alog 31675 , and the filter causing it was turned off, alog 31701.

In searching the alog, I happened to find my own alog from June 2015, alog 18930, where I noticed the ASC ITMY pitch signal was about 3 times larger than ITMX's, at 500pp and 150pp (counts?) respectively.  This may have changed since that alog, but if that was still true before the ITMY fix last week, it gives a scale of how much bigger ITMY was vs ITMX, which might be helpful in comparing to what the SRM ASC needs now.

H1 PSL (CDS)
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:24, Saturday 26 November 2016 (31866)
Optical Lever 7 Day Trends

CDS: The python nds2 client that the script uses could not get data today and yesterday.

FAMIS#:4703

Since the script was not working, I had to do this the old fashioned way. I'm glad this was made into a script!

ITMX P, ETMY P are getting close to out of bounds, but other than that it all looks good.

Images attached to this report
H1 ISC
kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:56, Saturday 26 November 2016 (31865)
some data during the POP90 jump

Sheila, Kiwamu,

This is a follow up of the latest AS90 jump incident reported in 31844.

We think this anomalous behaviour started in this past Wednesday (31804). This time, we looked into some other signals and found elevated noise in SRCL, although we are still unable to localize the issue.

[Time line]

[Some observations]

The symptom is very similar to what was reported in 31804. The POP 90 increased from 13 cnts to 16 cnts. Since the AS diverter was closed, it is hard to say whether there is a jump in AS90 or not. The jump also seems to have caused misalignment in SRC1 as was the case in 31804. The first attachment is trend of some relevant signals. The leftmost vertical line in each column represents the time when the POP90 jumped. The second vertical line represents the time when TJ opened the SRC1 loop and did manual alignment. Similarly to 31804, the POP90 became noisier after the jump. The LO signals in AS36 WFSs didn't show any obvious glitch or abrupt change.

This time we looked at the spectra of the AS A 36 signals and the SRCL error signal. See the second attachment. In each panel, the blue curve is taken before the jump or at evaluation point #1 (see the above list). The green curve is taken right after the jump or at evaluation point #2. Finally the red curve is taken after TJ's fix or at evaluation point #3. I was hoping to see an obvious change in the spectra that might indicate some electronics issue, but the AS 36 signals didn't really show an obvious change as far as the spectra are concerned. However, on the other hand, we found a difference in the SRCL length error signal although this is not easy to interpret. Right after the jump the SRCL noise increased in 3 - 30 Hz by roughly a factor of two. This cannot be explained by the change in the optical gain beucase the increased POP90 should mean a lower optical gain for seinsing SRCL. Another explanation might be a worse A2L coupling contaminating SRCL due to the different spot positions on the SR mirrors.

Images attached to this report
H1 SEI
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:33, Saturday 26 November 2016 - last comment - 16:30, Sunday 27 November 2016(31863)
BRSX status

I was curious to see how the BRSX was doing, so attached is a quick 5 day trend. It seems that it may be slowly ringing down after Jim vistied on Thursday.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - 16:30, Sunday 27 November 2016 (31884)

Even better today. Might be time to turn the damper back on soon.

Images attached to this comment
LHO General
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:04, Saturday 26 November 2016 (31862)
Ops Eve Shift Transition

TITLE: 11/27 Eve Shift: 00:00-08:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Lock Acquisition
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Travis
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    Wind: 4mph Gusts, 3mph 5min avg
    Primary useism: 0.03 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.36 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY: On our way back up after some issues described in the log below mine.
 

H1 General
travis.sadecki@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:00, Saturday 26 November 2016 (31853)
Ops Day Shift Summary

TITLE: 11/26 Day Shift: 16:00-00:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Commissioning
INCOMING OPERATOR: TJ
SHIFT SUMMARY:
LOG:

17:50 Kyle on site checking pumps.

18:01 Patrick to CER

18:05 Robert to EY

19:50 Robert and AnnaMaria to put beam dump in MC Refl, Patrick to CER taking top off of Beckhoff module.

20:30 ECat chassis is fixed.  Start relocking.

23:50 PCal X 5001.3 Hz line turned off.

H1 General (CAL, INJ)
travis.sadecki@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:51, Saturday 26 November 2016 (31861)
High frequency line turned OFF at PCalX

At the request of Adam Mullavey (via a phone call from Rick), I have turned off the 5001.3Hz PCal line at EndX for some injection work.  I did this by zeroing the amplitude of the line, leaving all other parameters unchanged.  See attached screenshot for setting before I changed them.

In a later email forwarded by Rick, Shivaraj mentions having to change Guardian code to keep these lines off at LLO.  I'm unaware of any such PCal Guardian code at LHO (my guess is that this is due to the fact that LHO doesn't use PCal for locking like LLO does), so made no changes to Guardian.  If someone reading this knows otherwise, please contact myself and the current operator.

Images attached to this report
H1 General
travis.sadecki@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:14, Saturday 26 November 2016 (31860)
Ops Day Mid Shift Summary

We are just starting to do initial alignment after the Beckhoff issue was resolved by Patrick and Richard.  So far, so good.

H1 CDS
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:00, Saturday 26 November 2016 - last comment - 12:34, Saturday 26 November 2016(31854)
Beckhoff issues (h1ecatc1)
It appears the problem is either with ISC Common L20, ISC Common M0, or the link between (see attached screenshots). I will go out to the CER and take a look.
Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - 10:15, Saturday 26 November 2016 (31856)
I tried slowly power cycling the ISC Common chassis in the CER twice. Each time it came back in the same state. Since the problem is reported as being between two terminals internal to the chassis, I'm not sure what else can be done without pulling the chassis out of the rack.
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - 10:21, Saturday 26 November 2016 (31857)
I've left a voice message with Richard. I want to touch base with him before I go further.
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - 12:34, Saturday 26 November 2016 (31858)
Richard came in and we opened the top of the chassis in situ. We swapped the internal cables around and determined that the problem was with the ISC Common M0 module. This is the EK1100 EtherCAT module in the middle row of the ISC Common chassis. We replaced that module and it is back up and running. The only cable removed during this was one of the Ethernet cables in the back of the chassis. This cable should be replaced with a longer one.

The serial number of the module that was replaced is 04110621.
H1 General
nutsinee.kijbunchoo@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:11, Saturday 26 November 2016 - last comment - 13:09, Saturday 26 November 2016(31849)
Ops Owl Shift Summary

TITLE: 11/26 Owl Shift: 08:00-16:00 UTC (00:00-08:00 PST), all times posted in UTC

STATE of H1: Unknown

INCOMING OPERATOR: Travis

SHIFT SUMMARY: H1 stayed locked most of the shift. Now I'm running into an issue I've never dealt with before. See alog31847 for details. This alog has disappeared magically. See alog31850 (comment below) for details.

LOG:

9:05 Noticed range slowly dropping, out of Observe to adjust SRM P

9:08 Back to Observe

9:12 Noticed that I made it worse, back to commissioning to move SRM P the other way round.

9:16 back to Observe.

13:39 Lockloss

14:24 THE confusing lockloss. Below I copied some of the Verbal Alarm message that might be useful in giving people insight of what's going on. It would be useful to know how long does the code take to loop though all the status of things.

          14:23:16 VIOLIN_MODE_DAMPING2

          14:23:28 TCS CO2 lasers tripped

          14:23:24 ISI HAM6 WD tripped

          14:23:48 ETMX ISI ST1 WD tripped

          14:23:48 ETMX ISI ST2 WD tripped.

          14:24:01 DOWN

Comments related to this report
nutsinee.kijbunchoo@LIGO.ORG - 08:18, Saturday 26 November 2016 (31850)

My alog describing Beckhoff issues seems to have dissapeared (HOW IS THIS EVEN POSSIBLE?) so I'm copying the content here.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

After 7 hours H1 lost lock for not so obvious reason (as always, I just haven't had a chance to investigate). This confusing lockloss occured as I tried to recover from the 7-hour lockloss. I stepped out after got through DC READOUT and came back to find that the lock broke at Violin Mode Damping 2 according to the Verbal alarm.

 

 

Couple of strange things happened (and still happening)

1) PSL power request suddenly went all the way up to 156W but the actual output got stuck at 30W. I couldn't use LASER_PWR guardian to move it back to 2W. The log repeatedly output the message:

2016-11-26T14:47:54.58953 LASER_PWR [GOTO_POWER_2W_FAST.run] ezca: H1:PSL-POWER_SCALE_OFFSET => 28.95

Seems like LASER_PWR guardian keeps outputing the offset to the channel. I can't manually put it in. I can't caput it. This offset is probably based on the input power to IMC so it make sense that it agrees with the input power. I also couldn't turn the rotation state manually on the rotation state screen.

 

2) Both TCSX and Y mysteriously tripped during prior to this lockloss. The medm status is READY so I went to check the interlock box. GATE and ENABLE lights are on but Remote Enable light is off. I've never seen this before. CDS overview doesn't have anything red on it. If the IR sensors saw a flash of carrier light as the lock broke, the GATE light wouldn't have been on and it shouldn't do anything to the Remote Enable light.

 

I'm really really confused right now. Still investigating and hopefully fixing seomthing. If somebody wake up and see this log and have some idea of what might be going on, please call the control room. Otherwise I (and Day shift op) will be calling people after 8am.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

**UPDATE**

The rotation state medm screen seems to be stuck. It won't calculate angle requested when you put in new power, and true the other way round. The state is stuck at "busy"

According to ECAT1PLC3 SDF differences. It seems to me that TCS (and likely PSL) rotation states got stuck some how. How do I verify if Beckhoff computer controling RS is working properly?

 

**UPDATE 15:30**

Found CDS overview medm shows ERROR status for ECAT C1PLC1 and 2

 

**UPDATE 16:08**

Beckhoff error may have caused the most recent lockloss. C1PLC1 error flag came up prior to ISC_LOCK guardian went down. This is also true for the 7-hour lockloss. I don't know what's going on with C1PLC2.

Images attached to this comment
daniel.sigg@LIGO.ORG - 13:09, Saturday 26 November 2016 (31859)

The screen in alog 30842 can be used to diagnose hardware errors. It can be found from the menu SYS under EtherCAT. Each computer has one somewhere under PLC1.

Slavecountactual: The number of EtherCAT modules seen by the software
Slaveccountconfig: The number of configured modules

These two numbers should agree, indicated by slavecounterror.

Lostframes: Number of lost Ethernet frames since last reset. Any large number, or one that increases steadily is a problem.
Same goes for Lostqueuedframes.

The subscreen under workingcounters keeps track of the different types of EtherCAT frames, but is maybe more for the experts.

Displaying reports 53781-53800 of 84788.Go to page Start 2686 2687 2688 2689 2690 2691 2692 2693 2694 End