Displaying reports 54381-54400 of 83191.Go to page Start 2716 2717 2718 2719 2720 2721 2722 2723 2724 End
Reports until 09:42, Monday 12 September 2016
H1 TCS (TCS)
aidan.brooks@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:42, Monday 12 September 2016 (29613)
TEM00 scatter from residual lens (non-spherical lens) at higher powers

Since we're getting into the regime of higher power operations, we need to start thinking about TCS from a higher-order mode standpoint (higher than just spherical power/defocus). The current CO2 laser central heating and the ring heater provide almost 100% spherical power correction to the optic. The SELF heating, however, still produces a partly non-spherical lens from the absorption of the Gaussian beam.

These residual non-spherical lenses will increasingly cause problems as we go to higher power.

I've run a quick analysis of how much TEM00 is scattered AFTER the nominal spherical lens is corrected. This is purely for the substrate thermal lens (not for surface deformation, which is about 1/12th of the size).

For this model:

 

The scatter is calculated in the following way:

w0 = 54E-3;

k = 2*pi/1064E-9;

E1 = exp(-(r/w0)^2)

OPD1 = uncompensated lens (dobule-passed)

S0 = best fit defocus (spherical power) to uncompensated lens

OPD2 = OPD1 - S0/2 * r^2   % the residual thermal lens after spherical power is removed

E2 = E1*exp(i*k*OPD2)

OL = sum(r*conj(E1)*E2)*sum(r*E1*conj(E2)) / [ sum(r*E2*conj(E2))*sum(r*conj(E1)*E1) ]   % overlap between pure gaussian and gaussian with residual thermal lens added as phase front error

scatter = 1- OL

The resulting plot shows the fractional scatter versus the absorbed power.

For reference, we'd really like to keep the round-trip scatter to 0.1% or less. The next step should be reviewing a detailed SIS model to try to refine these numbers. 

Conclusion: we should consider a more appropriate CO2 heating beam shape for O2B.

Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
H1 SEI
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:31, Monday 12 September 2016 - last comment - 09:45, Monday 12 September 2016(29614)
HEPI CS Pump Station Servo Outage Recovery Troubles -- all is okay

During the power outage recovery, Nutsinee had difficulty getting the HEPI Pump Servo to not fault out in the corner station.  We traced that to the level continuing to trip so she and Sheila lowered the level sensor on the reservoir.  The servo managed fine after that.  This morning the level is less than 1/16" lower than my latest level reading from last Tuesday.  It is cooler today and this fluctuation is within typical temperature fluctuations. So, I don't suspect a leak although I will visually check all the lines for signs of a leak tomorrow.  Neither do I suspect an accumulator leak although the abrupt pressure shift from the outage may have jarred the gas charge side schraeder valve.  I would be more inclined to suggest an air buble that was caught somewhere finally managed to burp its way out lowering the volume level.  And finally, since the level sensor setting is invasive and blind, I likely had it set very close to the trip point and Nutsinee suffered the worst of it.

Comments related to this report
nutsinee.kijbunchoo@LIGO.ORG - 09:45, Monday 12 September 2016 (29615)

For a reference, see attach photos for how much we lowered the sensor. We didn't bring out a ruler so we used Sheila's hand as a reference.

Images attached to this comment
H1 PSL
peter.king@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:33, Monday 12 September 2016 (29612)
PSL trends since chiller swap
Attached cooling circuit related trends since the chiller swap and power outage.
Images attached to this report
H1 CDS (DAQ)
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:21, Monday 12 September 2016 (29611)
CDS model and DAQ restart report, Friday 9th, Saturday 10th, Sunday 11th September 2016

model restarts logged for Sun 11/Sep/2016
2016_09_11 00:29 h1fw2
2016_09_11 01:11 h1iopoaf0
2016_09_11 01:11 h1oaf
2016_09_11 01:11 h1pemcs
2016_09_11 01:11 h1tcscs
2016_09_11 01:12 h1calcs
2016_09_11 01:12 h1ngn
2016_09_11 01:12 h1odcmaster
2016_09_11 01:12 h1susprocpi
2016_09_11 02:19 h1fw2
2016_09_11 04:11 h1fw2
2016_09_11 06:02 h1fw2
2016_09_11 07:56 h1fw2
2016_09_11 09:52 h1fw2
2016_09_11 13:36 h1fw2
2016_09_11 15:24 h1fw2
2016_09_11 17:12 h1fw2
2016_09_11 18:59 h1fw2
2016_09_11 20:52 h1fw2

test frame writer fw2 has been unstable since power outage. Looks like h1oaf0 needed a restart to clear stuck DACs.

model restarts logged for Sun 11/Sep/2016

Power outage, all machines were restarted.

model restarts logged for Fri 09/Sep/2016
2016_09_09 10:59 h1fw1
2016_09_09 11:11 h1psliss
2016_09_09 11:12 h1broadcast0
2016_09_09 11:12 h1dc0
2016_09_09 11:12 h1fw0
2016_09_09 11:12 h1fw1
2016_09_09 11:12 h1fw2
2016_09_09 11:12 h1nds0
2016_09_09 11:12 h1nds1
2016_09_09 11:12 h1tw0
2016_09_09 11:12 h1tw1

2016_09_09 15:32 h1calcs
2016_09_09 15:32 h1iopoaf0
2016_09_09 15:32 h1ngn
2016_09_09 15:32 h1oaf
2016_09_09 15:32 h1odcmaster
2016_09_09 15:32 h1pemcs
2016_09_09 15:32 h1tcscs
2016_09_09 15:33 h1susprocpi

fw1 bios settings were recorded. New PSL ISS code with DAQ restart. h1oaf0 restarted to clear stuck DACs.

H1 ISC
terra.hardwick@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:40, Monday 12 September 2016 (29608)
New ITMY PI 14982 Hz

Sheila, Terra

Tonight we saw a new PI mode ring up due to the recent increase of ITMY ring heater power: MODE 9, 14982 Hz. Damping was successful. 

Increasing ring heater power shifts the optical beat note peak (between TEM_0,0 and TEM_0,3) down in frequency, increasing the frequency overlap with the 15000 Hz and 15070 Hz mechanical mode groups (while decreasing the overlap with the 15500 Hz mode group). MODE 9 rang up at 35 W about 3 hours into a 50 W then 35 W lock. It damped with no phase and -1000 damping gain. 

I've added active damping for MODE 9 to the SUS_PI guardian.

H1 DetChar
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:30, Sunday 11 September 2016 - last comment - 12:12, Monday 12 September 2016(29606)
Possible fringe wrapping

Evan, Sheila

Since the power reduction from 50W to 35W at about 2:25 UTC Sept 11, we have been sitting with the IFO mostly undistured other than changes to PI damping.  We have not been in low noise (no ISS second loop, we are still on the high noise ESD driver), but we have seen some hugh noise in DARM that looks like a fringe wrapping shelf.  We reduced the power again at 3:46 UTC, and the noise got better and went away after 10s of mintes.  

We don't see anything in our LSC loops or main ASC loops that had a similar shape, do the detchar fringe wrapping/scattering tools offer any clues? Especially at the beinging of this time window, there is a lot of noise in DARM (a high frequency comb) which is due to a rung up PI mode. 

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
andrew.lundgren@LIGO.ORG - 12:12, Monday 12 September 2016 (29621)DetChar, ISC
Andy, Josh

This doesn't seem like fringe wrapping. We're looking mostly at the time from 2:50 to 3:30 UTC (actually Sep 12 in UTC day), after the IFO has settled a little from the transition from 50 down to 35 Watts, and before the power changes again. We find no optics moving enough longitudinally to make a scattering shelf, though it could be something moving in angle. But also, this doesn't really seem to have the time structure of a scattering shelf.

The first attachment has spectra starting at 2:50 and stepping every 10 minutes. It's very confusing, and things are moving in different directions. But focusing on the feature between 20 and 40 Hz, it's hard to get a sense of what it actually is. The next two attachments are 15-minute spectrograms that show a wide band of noise slowly walking down in frequency. But an Omega scan shows bursts of noise - they don't look like scattering. They also don't look big enough to account for all of this noise, so maybe there's a glitchy bit and a background of Gaussian noise.

The next two plots are coherences with MICH/PRC/SRC at the beginning and end of the period. The coherence is significant with all, and it goes up at the low frequencies toward the end (when the excess noise has moved down in frequency). So maybe it's just because of changing coupling to some auxiliary degrees of freedom.

I'll quickly mention that there's a lot of other things going on. The last attachment is a spectrogram showing a huge moving comb around 300 Hz. We also saw clear RF beatnote whistles. We'll look into all of these more.
Images attached to this comment
H1 ISC (ISC, TCS)
kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - posted 19:35, Sunday 11 September 2016 - last comment - 21:26, Wednesday 14 September 2016(29604)
continued work on high power locking with the latest ring heater setting

Evan H., Jenne, Matt, Kiwamu,

We locked the interferometer at 50 W with the latest ring heater setting (RHX = 0.5 W, RHY = 2.5 W, 29588). So far the interferometer has been locked at 50 W for roughly 1 hour.

P.S. we have now having difficulty damping a PI mode (mode2, 15520 ITMX) and decreased the PSL power back to 30 W.

 

[DRMI lock on POP sensors]

As reported yesterday (29601), we had a difficulty in switcing the sensors from the 3fs to 1fs earlier today (29603). In the end, I manually executed the sensor switch process one by one and for some reasons this was successful. I then measured the open loop transfer functions of the DRMI LSC degrees of freedom, but they looked OK. See the first attachjment. This may be due to that we did not wait for long enough time to let the new CO2 setting settle (29603) for lock acquisition ([CO2X, CO2Y] = [500 mW, 1000 mW]). Not sure.

Also, in lock acquisition, I manually kept aligning PR3 when the interferometer was at ANALOG_CARM in order to maintain the lock.

[CO2 tuning at 50 W]

This is not well tuned, but the below is an OK CO2 tuning for 50 W which gave us a 30% imbalance at the AS port OSA.

[CO2X, CO2Y ] = [300 -400 mW, 0W]

This time I did not spend time for tuning the dCO2 at 20 W or 40 W. Maybe I should have done that to collect more data points.

[PIs]

MODEs 17 and 27 needed a sign flip. Mode 27 seems tricky -- every time when it rang up we needed to flip the control sign.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
matthew.evans@LIGO.ORG - 21:46, Sunday 11 September 2016 (29607)

The PI difficulties are probably my fault. The phases may not have been set properly after the power glitch.

sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 00:41, Monday 12 September 2016 (29609)

After damping PIs (Terra is writing about this) we tried to take the IFO back to 50 W, but lost lock within a few minutes.  I'm not sure why we lost lock, it didn't seem to be PI or the usual sidebands tanking problem, there was a glitch in CHARD and DHARD a second before lockloss (1st attachment). 

We spent some time relocking and found that we had some problems durring the latter CARM offset reduction steps which were similar to what we had last night.  We measured the DARM loop at RF DARM and at the state CARM 15 pm, it seems fine (2nd attachment).  

It is possible that our relocking difficulties were due to bad alignment, or the new TCS.  As we were about to try to relock the 3rd time, we got hit by an EQ so we stopped for tonight. 

Images attached to this comment
kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - 18:52, Monday 12 September 2016 (29637)TCS

Here is some analysis of the sideband imbalance.

Synopsis -- Overall, adjustment of the CO2 lasers I did at 50 W improved the sideband imbalance at the AS port

However, the resulting CO2 setting does not match what we expected from the previous test (29585). We expected the final CO2 settings to be [CO2X, CO2Y] = [100 mW , 0 mW], but we ended up with [400 mW, 0 mW].

The 45 MHz seems to prefer a high CO2 contrast of roughly 400 mW (CO2X minus CO2Y) regardless of the ring heater settings so far, and this prevents us from further reducing the common lens.

 

[The sideband evolution as seen by the OSA]

The below shows a plot of the OSA raw output. I plotted several scans from different times, each of them is separated almost by 10 minutes in time.

Also, here is a rough time line of what I have done in this lock.

  • 17:36 The interferometer reached 50 W
    • CO2X and CO2Y were simultaneously reduced to 100 mW and 0 W respectively.
  • 18:00 I started increasing CO2X because the sideband imbalance was becoming worse.
  • 18:53 I kept increasing CO2X and eventually set CO2X to 400 mW
  • 19:24 PSL power was decreased to low power to combat the PIs.

Here is another plot showing how the sideband amplitude evolved as a function of time.

It is evident that increasing CO2X helped reducing the imbalance. Before I started changing CO2X, there was a slow trend in which the imbalance kept decreasing.

Images attached to this comment
kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - 00:12, Tuesday 13 September 2016 (29643)

Here is another trend plot.

The carrier recycling gain stayed at 29 at 50 W. The sideband build up or ASAIR90 seemed to have reached some kind of equilibrium after approximately 1 hour or so. Also, looking at ASAIR RF 45 Q, I don't see any change in the DARM offset point -- hopefully this is an indication of a stable optical gain. The Pcal line at 331.9 Hz was too small that it was burried below intensity noise. So I could not directly check the DARM optical gain.

Images attached to this comment
kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - 00:22, Tuesday 13 September 2016 (29644)

The intensity noise coupling changed as a function of time at 50 W. Here is a plot showing several coupling transfer functions from different time.

The measurement time were set to identical to the ones showed in above or 29637. Here is a plot of the transfer coefficient at 400 Hz as a function of time.

As you can see, the coupling became worse at the beginning for about 20 minutes or so. Then it came back to a value as small as the very begining. Although high frequency above 100 Hz seems to have settled to a small coupling, the low frequency part looked worse at the end. See the first attachment.

Images attached to this comment
kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - 01:34, Tuesday 13 September 2016 (29648)

As for the HWS signals, while the HWSX signal seems reasonable, the HWSY reports a twice large self heating.

Here are some conclusions from comparison of the predicted ITM lensing (outputs from TCS-SIM) and HWS outputs.

  • HWSX
    • It looks that we are overestimating the defocus by the self heating in the ITM substrate by 15% or so. This could be due to an inaccurate calibration of the arm power in the TCS simulator.
    • The CO2 actuator coefficient needs to be updated to 25 uD/W (28799). Because we use a high value for the CO2 actuation coefficient, the simulator overestimates the effect by 24 %.
  • HWSY
    • The below assumes an accurate readout of the HWSY.
    • The predicted self heat seems to be too low by almost a factor of two.
    • The predicted CO2 defocus is too high by 24% or so. This means the actuation coefficient should be 47 uD/W in the TCS simulator.
    • However, a 47 uD/W is not consistent with what we have measured (28799) -- the past measurement suggested that it should be about 25 uD/W.
  • Questions
    • Why does the CO2 X now have a smaller actuator coefficient? In the past it was 62.3 uD/W (T1400685).
    • Why is the CO2 Y coefficient different from a calibration measurement (28799)? The measurement suggested it was 25 uD/W and now it seems more like 47 uD/W.
    • Why the ITMY self heating increased by a factor of two?

 

The below shows a comparison between the single-pass defocus measured by HWSX and that predicted by simulator (with some coefficient fitting similarly to 27330):

I added a constant offset to the simulated defocus in order to plot it on top of the measured defocus. I removed the ring heater component that was unfortunately in the middle of settling to the equilibrium in the simulator due to the unscheduled model restart (29592).

The below is a same plot, but for the ITMY substrate defocus.

As noted in the legend, the component from the self heat needed to be increased by a factor of two.

Images attached to this comment
kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - 09:27, Wednesday 14 September 2016 (29692)

The stability of AS90 was apparently better with the combination of the new ring heater setting and dynamically-decreased CO2s.

The below plot shows a comparison of this lock stretch (Sep. 12) and two lock stretches (Sep. 09) from a day before we started changing the ring heater setting.

The two lock stretches from Sep. 09 both showed AS90 decreasing monotonically as a function of time. This was something we have been suffering from (29486) and has been an issue since the begining of this month (29457) at which we considerably changed the interferometer alignment.

In contrast, AS90 settled to a value pf 600 counts on a time scale of 30 minutes or so in the new lock stretch. This lock was stable until PI modes started ringing up. The carrier recycling gain was slightly lower than the previous two stretches. I don't know if this due to misalignment or new ring heater setting.

Images attached to this comment
kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - 21:26, Wednesday 14 September 2016 (29712)

Here are the evolution of the wavefront gradient as a function of time as seen by the Hartman sensors.

The starting time is set to Sep 12 2016 00:30:30 UTC at which the interferometer was in the middle of powering up to 50 W. The gradients are initilized such that the gradients are zero at dt = 0.

Images attached to this comment
H1 ISC (ISC)
matthew.evans@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:23, Sunday 11 September 2016 (29602)
PI damping model update (h1susprocpi, work permit 6149)

Matt, Terra (in spirit)

I have updated the h1susprocpi model to fix a few minor problems.

In terms of channel names, the impact of this model change should only be the addition of AMP_PRE_OFFSET and AMP_POST_OFFSET.  I have only updated the models (i.e., I have not rebuilt the FE code, etc.).  The corresponding work permit is 6149, and this change should go in with the next DAQ restart, or on Tuesday (which ever comes first).

Images attached to this report
H1 ISC (TCS)
kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - posted 02:52, Sunday 11 September 2016 - last comment - 21:04, Sunday 11 September 2016(29601)
Locking with the latest ring heater setting

Matt, Sheila, Stefan, Kiwamu,

We tried locking the interferometer with the latest ring heater setting (29558) tonight. The furthest point we got tonight was ANALOG_CARM.

Locking up to that point was OK with [CO2X, CO2Y] = [500 mW, 1100 mW]. However, we think CO2Y needs fine tuning to minimize the contrast defect. Once CO2Y is fine-adjusted, we wil study what is going on in the DRMI_ON_POP state.

Comments related to this report
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - 16:24, Sunday 11 September 2016 (29603)

[Matt, Jenne]

We fine tuned the CO2Y to 1.0 W.  This seems to be better, since the 1.1 W was an overshoot and hurt the pitch contrast defect.  Yesterday, the team started with yaw modes visible at the dark port.  Today we weren't really seeing yaw problems, but we did see pitch HOMs.  So, we dialed back the CO2Y, and think that we're in an okay place now.

Locking is still a struggle though :/

sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 21:04, Sunday 11 September 2016 (29605)

Last night I forgot to add that we reduced the gain of the MICH P ASC loop to avoid an instability at around 2.5 Hz in that loop.  This may have been a problem because of a little extra gain, but the gain was probably too high anyway.  We probably want to keep this ugf around 1.5 Hz, to be on top of the phase margin and to have a little bit of a gain hierarchy with the 8 Hz LSC loop. The gaurdian now has the digital gain reduced from 0.7 to 0.3 for MICH P. 

H1 AOS
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 01:37, Sunday 11 September 2016 (29600)
CO2Y trip

A few minutes after 8 UTC, CO2Y tripped. 

We restarted all the models on OAF.  When I went to the chillers, only CO2Y had a low temperature warning, but there was no low temperature fault after clearing this and the chiller stayed powered on (normally after the warning is cleared the fault appears, when the fault is aknowledged the chiler shuts off.)  The laser also did not have a temperature fault when I went to turn it on, although it was off.  

H1 General (CDS, GRD, SEI)
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 22:59, Saturday 10 September 2016 (29599)
more power outage recovery

Nutstinee, Stefan, Matt, Sheila, (Hugh, Dave, Jim, others on the phone)

We have basically recovered from this morning's outage about an hour ago.  There were a few things worth noting in additin to what people wrote earlier:

H1 PEM (DetChar)
robert.schofield@LIGO.ORG - posted 19:22, Saturday 10 September 2016 (29597)
Second magnetometer set up for blip glitch study and suggested humidification threshold

I set up a magnetometer by the high voltage input of the OMC piezo controller as another “shot in the dark” investigation of potential sources of blip glitches. I previously set up a magnetometer by the HV inputs to the ETMY ESD. I have been focusing on HV, because of the correlation between a class of blip glitches and low-humidity that Paul, Jordan and I found (https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=28534). 

In related news, John W. and Bubba have started commissioning humidifiers. I suggest that we humidify VEAs/LVEA, electronics bays and MSR when the relative humidity drops below 7% inside of the buildings. Based on the high correlation between low inside humidity and low outside temperature last year (heating dries), an alternative that would give nearly the same threshold would be to start humidifying when the maximum outside temperature is going to be below freezing for more than one day in a row.

Channels

ETMY ESD HV: H1:PEM-EY_ADC_0_08,12,13_OUT_DQ

OMC piezo HV:  H1:PEM-CS_ADC_4_28_2K_OUT_DQ

Robert

H1 CDS
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:10, Saturday 10 September 2016 (29596)
CDS recovery report

I have all the front end computers (except mid-pem) running. IRIG-B excursions were minimal.

We ended up power cycling all dolphin'ed frontend computers and IOC chassis.

DAQ rode through the outage.

H1 TCS
kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - posted 19:06, Friday 09 September 2016 - last comment - 17:38, Saturday 10 September 2016(29585)
TCS tuning test at 20 and 40 W

Stefan, Matt, Kiwamu,

This is a quick note. We started another TCS test in this afternoon with the new ring heater setting (RHX = 0.5 W and RHY = 1.5 W, 29557).

With a 20 W interferometer, the CO2 settings that balances the 45 MHz upper and lower sidebands were found to be at almost where we thought it should be. Then we increased the PSL power to 40 W to study the interferometer absorption as a function of the PSL power. With the sideband imbalance adjusted, the lock seems more stable at 40 W.

 

[good values that balances the 45 MHz sidebands]

These settings seem to give us a small imbalance within 10%. Also, lock acquisition was done with [CO2X, CO2Y] = [500 mW, 700 mW] in which I did not adjust the differential CO2 settings.

By the way, the attached trends show how the aberration changed when we went from 20 to 40 W. Notice that ITMY show relatively high aberration values (e.g. cylindrical, coma, spherical aberration) compared to the ones for ITMX. The last attachment is a StripTool showing the HWS outputs. A jump in the middle is due to us increasing the PSL from 20 to 40 W. After we sat on 40 W for approximately 1 hour, we started decreasing the common TCS and kept adjusting the differential CO2.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
matthew.evans@LIGO.ORG - 17:38, Saturday 10 September 2016 (29589)

We subsequently went to 50W and saw little change.  There was some more uncompensated lensing, but it was not a big effect and the lock remained stable.  We had a little trouble with PIs (mostly self-inflicted due to PLL testing) which caused a brief retreat to 35W, but we quickly returned to 50W.  After about 30 minutes at 50W, we started the transition to low-noise.  This broke the lock, apparently during the feed-forward turn on and due to a ASC-SRC1_YAW run-away.  To be investigated...

Images attached to this comment
H1 IOO (IOO, ISC)
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:25, Friday 09 September 2016 - last comment - 07:36, Monday 12 September 2016(29571)
consistancy of pitch and yaw qpd signals downstream of the IMC - a second look

After finding that the ISS 2nd loop pitch and yaw signals are swapped, and inverted wrt im4 trans (my first look at qpds downstream of the IMC, alog 29542), I've looked at four qpds downstream of the IMC for signal consistancy - IM4 Trans, ISS 2nd Loop, POPA, and POPB.

What I found:

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - 07:36, Monday 12 September 2016 (29610)IOO

chart showing the current orientations:

  pitch yaw
IM4 Trans 1 1
ISS 2nd loop -yaw -pitch
POPA -1 1
POPB ? 1
H1 SYS
jameson.rollins@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:25, Friday 09 September 2016 - last comment - 22:43, Saturday 10 September 2016(29563)
script/python library for downloading data from Tektronix oscilloscope

I wrote a simple interface to download data from the Tektronix network/web-enabled oscilloscopes (TDS3034B and (presumably) the like).  You can use it to download a single data file, or download data periodically:


jameson.rollins@opsws8:~ 0$ readlink -f $(which tektronix)
/opt/rtcds/userapps/trunk/sys/common/src/python/tektronix.py
jameson.rollins@opsws8:~ 0$ tektronix -h
usage: tektronix [-h] <command> ...

Interact with Tektronix oscilloscope over the network.

positional arguments:
  <command>
    download  Download data from scope periodicially

optional arguments:
  -h, --help  show this help message and exit

Use environment variable HOST to specify network address.
(default: 10.22.10.51)
jameson.rollins@opsws8:~ 0$ tektronix download -h
usage: tektronix download [-h] [-c CHANNEL] [outdir] [count] [period]

Download data from scope periodicially

Data will be saved in a two-column (time,voltage), comma-separated CSV
file named "<time>.dat", where <time> is an ISO-formatted timestamp of
the local time of the data snapshot.

NOTE: data takes about 30 seconds to download, so period should not be
less than 30 seconds.

positional arguments:
  outdir                directory to store timestamped data ['.']
  count                 number of downloads (0=Inf) [1]
  period                time between downloads in seconds [60]

optional arguments:
  -h, --help            show this help message and exit
  -c CHANNEL, --channel CHANNEL
                        channel to download ['ch1']
jameson.rollins@opsws8:~ 0$ tektronix download
output directory: /ligo/home/jameson.rollins
fetching 2016-09-09T11:16:31.747247.dat ...done (in 29.959158s).
jameson.rollins@opsws8:~ 0$
Comments related to this report
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 22:43, Saturday 10 September 2016 (29598)

For the current OSA set up, we are using scope2 which has an IP address of 10.22.10.51

Displaying reports 54381-54400 of 83191.Go to page Start 2716 2717 2718 2719 2720 2721 2722 2723 2724 End