Displaying reports 56001-56020 of 85646.Go to page Start 2797 2798 2799 2800 2801 2802 2803 2804 2805 End
Reports until 19:01, Wednesday 12 October 2016
H1 PSL (PSL)
nutsinee.kijbunchoo@LIGO.ORG - posted 19:01, Wednesday 12 October 2016 (30477)
weekly PSL status report

Laser Status: SysStat is good

Front End Power is 34.78W (should be around 30 W)

Front End Watch is GREEN

HPO Watch is GREEN

PMC: It has been locked 0.0 days, 2.0 hr 12.0 minutes (should be days/weeks)

Reflected power is 34.32Watts and PowerSum = 135.1Watts.

FSS: It has been locked for 0.0 days 1.0 hr and 27.0 min (should be days/weeks)

TPD[V] = 3.682V (min 0.9V)

ISS: The diffracted power is around 4.339% (should be 5-9%)

Last saturation event was 0.0 days 1.0 hours and 27.0 minutes ago (should be days/weeks)

Possible Issues:

H1 TCS
nutsinee.kijbunchoo@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:41, Wednesday 12 October 2016 (30472)
Multiple CO2Y trips investigation

Dave, Kiwamu, Nutsinee

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quick conclusion: It's probably related to the CO2Y rotation stage.

Lengthy details: Dave notcied TCSY chiller DAC output went crazy yesterday. After making sure that it wasn't the model update (alog30429, alog30384) that did it we investigated further. The crazy output to the chiller was due to TCS guardian trying to lock the laser when there were no laser (as the result the guadian keeps increasing and decrasing chiller temperature by about 1 deg C).

 

The cause of CO2 laser trips was due to RTD/IR ALARM interlock tripped, which always coincide with either power-up state and lockloss state. Although not every power-up or locklosses caused CO2Y to trip. We also looked at POP but it's not showing here.

 

This immediately made us think of the CO2Y rotation stage that would only move during these times. Could this be either Beckhoff or electronics issue? The fact that it actually tripped the interlock box made me think of grounding issue. But I always blame grounding.

 

Also Kiwamu was able to untrip the RTD/IR interlock and get the CO2 into "ready" state just by toggling LASER ON/OFF button. This is what we don't understand. How is this even possible?

 

 

The End.

Images attached to this report
H1 ISC (ISC)
gabriele.vajente@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:34, Wednesday 12 October 2016 (30473)
Jitter feed forward

Tried the new feedforward path, adding the DBB Q1Y signal to the DARM IN1 signal. It's working.

First, I measured the transfer function from Q1Y to DARM (no noise injection), and fitted it. The result is shown in the first figure (I removed from the fit the 2kHz sharp feature which is clearly a misfit artifact). The filter is implemented in the LSC-JITTERFF bank.

The second plot shows the improvement in the DARM signal and the reduction of coherence whe the feedforward is on (blue reference with FF off, red with FF on). All the peaks remaining in the DARM signal are not due to the HPO jitter.

We shall see how stable this is over time.

Images attached to this report
H1 PSL
gabriele.vajente@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:10, Wednesday 12 October 2016 (30470)
Temporary MEDM screen for jitter feedforward

A temporary MEDM screen for the jitter feedforward can be found here

/opt/rtcds/userapps/release/isc/h1/medm/JITTER_DBB_FF.adl

It's been linked to the LSC menu in the sitemap.

The model modifications are described in 30412.

H1 CDS (SUS)
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:28, Wednesday 12 October 2016 - last comment - 17:45, Wednesday 12 October 2016(30467)
Corner station hardware watchdog LED events correlate with satellite amp coil drive activity

On Tuesday 11th October we installed the ITMX and ETMX hardware watchdog chassis (HWWD) in monitor mode, which completes the install of the four HWWD chassis.

Previously we had found that the ITMY HWWD reported LED-current-monitor undervoltages which were not been seen on ETMY. In the past 24 hours we have now seen similar events on ITMX, which suggests the longer cabling to the ITM systems may be a factor.

For the past 20 hours, I plotted the ITMX HWWD LED-current-monitor status against an OSEM coil drive signal (I chose top stage F1 as a representative example). There is a clear correlation between coil drive activity and the detection of a low voltage on the LED-current-monitor as seen by the HWWD (shows up as STAT_OUT = 8). I've attached two plots, one showing the two signals separately, on the other I have scaled the coil drive signal to a compatible Y-axis scale and plotted them together.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
keith.thorne@LIGO.ORG - 17:45, Wednesday 12 October 2016 (30471)CDS
Hmm - perhaps current-loop would have been a better design given the long cables?
H1 General (OpsInfo)
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:09, Wednesday 12 October 2016 (30466)
Ops Day Summary:

State of H1: locking, some issues with PI, with Tara's fix H1 is going to Nominal Low Noise

Assistance:  Tara, Jenne, (Richard, Jason, earlier today)

NOTE:  If TCSY tripps off, please call Kiwamu or Nutsinee before restarting, they are hunting errors, so need to see the system before restart

Activities:

Currently:

 

H1 ISC (ISC)
gabriele.vajente@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:50, Wednesday 12 October 2016 - last comment - 17:00, Wednesday 12 October 2016(30465)
SRM alignment vs noise

Not much IFO up time so far, but this morning I managed to move SRM in both pitch and yaw, and see a reduction of the noise. I recall this was already know. Moving pitch by about +20 urad seems to give the best position. Also the SRC1_P error signal respond quite well to the motion, and it seems to cross zero at the right position. Also, after SRM pitch is aligned, the SRC1_Y error signal repond to yaw motion of the SRM. So it looks like we should be able to close SRC1 both P and Y, although with small bandwidth.

The attached plot shows:

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - 17:00, Wednesday 12 October 2016 (30468)

For the record, SRC1's error signal is AS_A_45_I for both pitch and yaw at the times he's looking (it gets switched to this in the SRC_ASC_high_power state, since we were considering these as candidates earlier).

LHO VE
chandra.romel@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:41, Wednesday 12 October 2016 (30464)
CP4 experiment
With new thermocouple installed inside vertical section of exhaust pipe, I overfilled CP4 today. TC registered LN2 with very little forewarning. Temp fell to -60 deg C with LN2 trickling out exhaust (bypass exhaust valve open and check valve removed).
Images attached to this report
LHO VE
chandra.romel@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:38, Wednesday 12 October 2016 (30463)
CP3 overfill
1:30 pm local

Took 20 sec to overfill CP3 with 1/2 open on bypass LLCV, but found the entire exhaust line frosted over with a pile of snow on ground. Looking back at last year's LLCV level after a Dewar fill, I decided to lower the LLCV yet again from 17% to 16%. 

Left bypass exhaust valve open.
H1 ISC
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:26, Wednesday 12 October 2016 (30462)
Adjusted ALS Fiber Polarization, Y and X
H1 GRD
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:05, Wednesday 12 October 2016 (30461)
DIAG_SDF now checks Beckhoff FEs

I added a second class to (userapps)/sys/common/guardian/cdslib.py for the Beckhoff FEs. This will look through the autoburt.req's that are created upon build, and find the DCUID from the model name, or vise versa. Code is loaded in and committed and the diffs are being reported.

H1 PSL
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:06, Wednesday 12 October 2016 - last comment - 21:33, Wednesday 12 October 2016(30458)
Tweaked PSL rotation stage calibration

[Jenne, Cheryl, Nutsinee]

We tweaked the calibration of the PSL rotation stage, which hadn't been done since the power incident on the rotation stage was adjusted about a week ago.  Now hopefully a 50W request will give us 50W, rather than some higher value.  Nutsinee has her script ready for next time, so we can try doing it automatically rather than by hand.

Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - 21:33, Wednesday 12 October 2016 (30479)

I have written a fitting script for PSL rotation stage calibration, and put it in ...../userapps/psl/h1/scripts/RotationStage/

First, run Nutsinee's script MoveRotationStage.py, which will move the rotation stage from -90deg to +90deg, in 5 degree steps, and record the measured angle and the power at the PSL periscope to a text file.

Then with Matlab, run CalibRotStage.m.  This will load the data, calibrate it, and give you a plot with the fitted calibration parameters in the legend. 

Finally, move those values to the PSL rotation stage's calibration screen. 

Unfortunately though, when we use the LASER_PWR guardian to request 50W, we only get about 48W.  This was true earlier with my hand-tuned calibration, as well as with the fits.  This is something that could be looked into.

Images attached to this comment
Non-image files attached to this comment
H1 General (OpsInfo)
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:40, Wednesday 12 October 2016 (30457)
Ops Mid-Day Update:

State of H1: locking and has made it to Low Noise

Activities:

Other Site Activities:

H1 CDS (DAQ)
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:38, Wednesday 12 October 2016 (30456)
new CDS MEDM screens for DAQ and HWWD

I have created new DAQ and HWWD oveview screens. The DAQ displays the additional diagnostics information Jonathan's new code produces. The HWWD includes the ITMX and ETMX systems which were installed yesterday, and shows which systems are connected to the ISI coil drivers.

Images attached to this report
H1 TCS (AOS)
jason.oberling@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:27, Wednesday 12 October 2016 - last comment - 13:24, Wednesday 12 October 2016(30451)
TCSy Chiller Topped Off and Flow Alarm Reset

I added 250mL of water to the TCSy chiller this morning, bringing the reading on the scale from 4.5 to 9.0.

In addition, the TCSy CO2 laser tripped out this morning on a flow alarm.  Peter and I reset the laser box (key off, then key on) to clear the alarm and restart the laser.  Cheryl had trended the flow channel for the CO2 laser and indeed the flow dropped to zero and recovered (I don't have the trend, perhaps Cheryl will post it later).  Maybe an air bubble working its way through the system?

Comments related to this report
alastair.heptonstall@LIGO.ORG - 10:33, Wednesday 12 October 2016 (30452)

That's a bit concerning and not something that I believe we've seen (other than on this one system recently).  Certainly possible that it's an air bubble.  We'll need to watch this because if the flow sensor causes it to trip out then we will start having down time on the laser.  Are there any bubbles visible in any of the tubing or do you think these are getting trapped at some high point in the system?  The highest point overall should be up at the chillers, but there will be other local high points such as on the table.

nutsinee.kijbunchoo@LIGO.ORG - 12:28, Wednesday 12 October 2016 (30454)

The trend suggests that the flow rate only went to 0 for 3 seconds then made its way back up. Bubble does sound reasonable.

Images attached to this comment
alastair.heptonstall@LIGO.ORG - 12:36, Wednesday 12 October 2016 (30455)

There look to be some regular dips in flowrate, perhaps also bubble related. Might be easier to see in non-trended data how long and deep these dips are.

jason.oberling@LIGO.ORG - 13:01, Wednesday 12 October 2016 (30459)

I took a 30 second full data trend from the trip, also including the interlock signal.  As can be seen the flow rate is not at its usual value of ~3.0 gpm for approximately 10 seconds.  Interestingly, the interlock does not trip until the flow has been below nominal for ~3 seconds.  Is this the expected behavior of this interlock?

Images attached to this comment
alastair.heptonstall@LIGO.ORG - 13:24, Wednesday 12 October 2016 (30460)

There is a low pass filter on the input, so yes that's expected behavior.  I am surprised that it goes negative though - this should be linear in current from the flowmeter which makes me think it can't go negative without the flowmeter running backwards.

H1 CAL (ISC)
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:06, Tuesday 11 October 2016 - last comment - 19:05, Wednesday 12 October 2016(30391)
New DARM OLGTFs and PCAL2DARM TFs; CAL-DELTAL_EXT is Wrong by 20% above 50 Hz
J. Kissel

I've used Kiwamu's templates (LHO aLOG 29860) to gather new DARM OLG and PCAL2DARM transfer functions, to help increase the number of data points for darm coupled cavity pole and SRC detuning spring frequencies. In doing so, I've found that PCAL suggests that CAL-DELTAL_EXTERNAL is wrong low by ~20% above 50 Hz, in a frequency dependent fashion (confirmed by the phase and ridiculously high coherence). 

We will analyze the data in-full, and report what the measured pole and spring frequencies are in the morning. We'll also show trends of calibration line heights, such that eventually we can confirm the frequencies over time.

This frequency dependent error in CAL-DELTAL_EXTERNAL may be because the DARM coupled cavity pole frequency programmed into the CAL CS fron end is 342 Hz, and that's just not correct for this lock stretch. We have to turn OFF the PCALY calibration lines during the measurement due to range issues, but the front end calculation of the DARM cavity pole, after the measurement, suggests anywhere for 315 Hz to 340 Hz. Unclear whether we can trust the online calculation just yet, so we're leaving the IFO alone for ~30 minutes after the measurement to be able to confirm offline later.

Recall that we're still not controlling the cavity waist angle/translation of the SRC entirely: the SRC1 loop (nominally controlling SRM alone) is OFF, but the SRC2 loop (controlling SRM and SR2) is ON.

Undisturbed time post-sweeps:
Start    Oct 11 2016 02:36:00 UTC   Oct 10 2016 19:36:00 PDT  1160188577
Stop     Oct 11 2016 03:07:00 UTC   Oct 10 2016 20:07:00 PDT  1160190437
 
The new measurements have not yet been exported, but have been committed to the CalSVN here:
/ligo/svncommon/CalSVN/aligocalibration/trunk/Runs/PreER10/H1/Measurements/
DARMOLGTFs/2016-10-10_H1_DARM_OLGTF_4to1200Hz.xml
PCAL/2016-10-10_H1_PCAL2DARMTF_4to1200Hz.xml


EDIT: I've added two screenshots showing the digital settings relevant to the DARM loop parameters. Unfortunately, the production conlog is down for maintenance/upgrades, but thankfully Patrick setup a test bed a few nights ago (goto http://conlog-test-replica/), I was able to pull the list of channels I needed. FAlso for the record, some of those channels have changed since O1, so I quote the new list here for easier copy and paste in the future: 
H1:LSC-DARM1_SWSTAT
H1:LSC-DARM1_GAIN
H1:LSC-DARM2_SWSTAT
H1:LSC-DARM2_GAIN
H1:SUS-ETMY_L1_LOCK_L_SWSTAT
H1:SUS-ETMY_L1_LOCK_L_GAIN
H1:SUS-ETMY_L1_DRIVEALIGN_L2L_SWSTAT
H1:SUS-ETMY_L1_DRIVEALIGN_L2L_GAIN
H1:SUS-ETMY_L2_LOCK_L_SWSTAT
H1:SUS-ETMY_L2_LOCK_L_GAIN
H1:SUS-ETMY_L2_DRIVEALIGN_L2L_SWSTAT
H1:SUS-ETMY_L2_DRIVEALIGN_L2L_GAIN
H1:SUS-ETMY_L3_ISCINF_L_SWSTAT
H1:SUS-ETMY_L3_ISCINF_L_GAIN
H1:SUS-ETMY_L3_LOCK_L_SWSTAT
H1:SUS-ETMY_L3_LOCK_L_GAIN
H1:SUS-ETMY_L3_DRIVEALIGN_L2L_SWSTAT
H1:SUS-ETMY_L3_DRIVEALIGN_L2L_GAIN
H1:SUS-ETMY_L3_LOCK_INBIAS
H1:SUS-ETMY_L3_ESDOUTF_LIN_BYPASS_SW
H1:SUS-ETMY_L3_ESDOUTF_LIN_FORCE_COEFF
H1:SUS-ETMY_BIO_M0_STATEREQ
H1:SUS-ETMY_BIO_L1_STATEREQ
H1:SUS-ETMY_BIO_L2_UL_STATEREQ
H1:SUS-ETMY_BIO_L2_LL_STATEREQ
H1:SUS-ETMY_BIO_L2_UR_STATEREQ
H1:SUS-ETMY_BIO_L2_LR_STATEREQ
H1:SUS-ETMY_BIO_L3_UL_STATEREQ
H1:SUS-ETMY_BIO_L3_UR_STATEREQ
H1:SUS-ETMY_BIO_L3_LL_STATEREQ
H1:SUS-ETMY_BIO_L3_LR_STATEREQ
Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
darkhan.tuyenbayev@LIGO.ORG - 20:22, Tuesday 11 October 2016 (30433)CAL

J. Kissel, D. Tuyenbayev,

Kappas calculated in the front-end suggest that an optical gain was lower compared to the reference time (optical gain in the DARM model) by ~15% and the coupled-cavity pole frequency was ~325 Hz at the TF measurement time.

Also it seems that the SNR of 331.9 Hz line is not sufficient - higher statistical noise in the calculated κC and fC.

Images attached to this comment
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 19:05, Wednesday 12 October 2016 (30475)
A little bit more quantitative assessment if the time dependent correction factors as computed by the front end (or "kappas"): 

I've grabbed similar undisturbed data from the times quoted in the original entry, and replotted them in matlab after doing some rudimentary math. The 15 minute (900 sec) average value (starting at Oct 11 2016 02:51:00 UTC) for all of the time dependent parameters just after the sweeps are:

Param            Units        Mean      Std
kappa_{C}        [ ]          0.866     pm 0.011
f_{cc}           [Hz]         323       pm 4.5
Re: kappa_{PU}   [ ]          1.01      pm 0.011
Im: kappa_{PU}   [ ]          -0.007    pm 0.012
Re: kappa_{TST}  [ ]          0.998     pm 0.0085
Im: kappa_{TST}  [ ]          0.0095    pm 0.0065

Input Power      [W]          50.5      pm 0.031

The script to generate these values lives in 
/ligo/svncommon/CalSVN/aligocalibration/trunk/Runs/PreER10/H1/Scripts/CAL_EPICS/get_fe_tdep_params.m

And for ease of copy and paste for someone in the future, I'm gathering the following channels (which correspond to the parameters in the same order as the table above)
H1:CAL-CS_TDEP_KAPPA_C_OUTPUT
H1:CAL-CS_TDEP_F_C_OUTPUT
H1:CAL-CS_TDEP_KAPPA_PU_REAL_OUTPUT
H1:CAL-CS_TDEP_KAPPA_PU_IMAG_OUTPUT
H1:CAL-CS_TDEP_KAPPA_TST_REAL_OUTPUT
H1:CAL-CS_TDEP_KAPPA_TST_IMAG_OUTPUT
H1:IMC-PWR_IN_OUTPUT
Non-image files attached to this comment
H1 IOO
daniel.sigg@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:11, Friday 07 October 2016 - last comment - 09:23, Thursday 13 October 2016(30305)
RAM measurements: Take 3

Evan, Daniel

17:12:30 UTC Oct 7 2016:

17:16:30 UTC Oct 7 2016:

17:18:30 UTC Oct 7 2016:

17:24:30 UTC Oct 7 2016:

17:32:00 UTC Oct 7 2016:

17:34:30 UTC Oct 7 2016:

18:06:30 UTC Oct 7 2016:

Comments related to this report
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - 11:16, Friday 07 October 2016 (30308)

Spectra attached.

Images attached to this comment
daniel.sigg@LIGO.ORG - 15:12, Friday 07 October 2016 (30313)

Coherence (modulation on)

Non-image files attached to this comment
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - 09:22, Monday 10 October 2016 (30369)

Using 2600 V/W for the demod gain and transimpedance, and 29 mW of dc PD power, this implies the following AM depths:

  I Q
9 MHz 0.95×10−4 2.4×10−4
45 MHz 1.9×10−4 8.2×10−4

Using 0.22 rad and 0.28 rad for the 9 MHz and 45 MHz modulation depths, this implies the following AM/PM ratios:

  I Q
9 MHz 0.43×10−3 1.1×10−3
45 MHz 0.67×10−3 2.9×10−3
Non-image files attached to this comment
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - 11:01, Wednesday 12 October 2016 (30450)

The attachment contains a budget of the expected CARM residual. The in-loop error point is taken from the CM board control signal, as was done previously. Here I used 2600 V/W for the transimpedance and demod gain.

The other measured traces are taken from the REFL9I readback (not from the CM board), so in principle there could be some extra dark noise at the error point from the summing node board or CM board. However, based on the O1 level this is of the same order as the shot noise (so we are not missing a huge amount of extra noise in this estimate).

Non-image files attached to this comment
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - 17:05, Wednesday 12 October 2016 (30469)

Attaching earlier RAM plot, this time with informative labels

Images attached to this comment
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - 09:23, Thursday 13 October 2016 (30493)

Here is a time series of REFL LF during the modulation depth reductions that happen during lock acquistion.

During the 9 MHz depth reduction (from 0.22 rad to 0.11 rad), the dc power changes from 4.83(3) mW to 4.27(3) mW. That means that after the modulation depth reduction, 4.08(4) mW of the dc light is from the carrier and 0.19(2) mW of the dc light is from the 9 MHz sideband (this assumes the 45 MHz contribution is negligible).

Note that the dc level is still settling to its final value of ~3.7 mW, so it's possible that these power ratios are evolving during the lock.

Images attached to this comment
Displaying reports 56001-56020 of 85646.Go to page Start 2797 2798 2799 2800 2801 2802 2803 2804 2805 End