Ross, Tega, Dave Barker, Joe Betzwieser, Jeff K
We have been using the new fixed phase oscillators on the h1omcpi and h1susetmxpi models. There was an ititial problem where there was an arbitrary phase mismatch between the two oscillators when viewing the two in a time series in dtt. This was fixed after we realised that the h1omcpi model had not been restarted after the new oscillators were included. After restarting this model they both now seem to be in phase with each other. We will be using these oscillators for the down/up conversion of the omc dcpd signal with the intention of using it for damping PI modes using the ESD at ETMX. I've included an image of the the dtt timeseries data of the two oscillator outputs where the second has twice the gain of the first. Documentation on the new oscillators can be found here https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-T1600143
Title: 05/11/2016, Day Shift 15:00 – 23:00 (08:00 – 16:00) All times in UTC (PT) State of H1: IFO unlocked. Commissioning: Outgoing Operator: N/A Activity Log: All Times in UTC (PT) 15:00 (08:00) Start of shift 15:30 (08:30) Peter – Working in the PSL 16:02 (09:02) Betsy – Going to End-Y to turn on ESD high power 16:03 (09:03) Joe – Going to End-Y for inventory checks 16:15 (09:15) Jason – Going into the PSL 16:20 (09:20) Betsy – Back from End-Y 16:48 (09:48) Joe – Back from End-Y 16:50 (09:50) Joe – Going into the LAVE for inventory checks 17:07 (10:07) Joe – Out of the LVEA 17:45 (10:45) Jason & Peter – Out of the PSL 17:50 (10:50) Joe – Moving pumps from Mechanical building 18:00 (11:00) Kyle – Going into LVEA vertex to check RGA 18:07 (11:07) Peter & Jason – Working in the PSL 18:15 (11:15) Chandra – Going to both end stations to get parts and tools 18:20 (11:20) Joe – Out of the LVEA 18:20 (11:20) Kyle – Out of the LVEA 18:50 (11:50) Corey – Going into the Squeezer Bay 19:11 (12:11) Chandra – Back from end stations 20:09 (13:09) Kyle – Going into LVEA to turn off RGA heat 20:14 (13:14) Kyle – Out of the LVEA 20:16 (13:16) Take IFO to DRMI_LOCKED for Sheila 21:42 (14:42) IFO down for PSL work 21:55 (14:55) Dave – Restarting the OMC PI model 21:57 (14:57) Filiberto – Going into the LVEA to check IO table panels 22:00 (15:00) Jason & Peter – In the PSL enclosure working on the ISS End of Shift Summary: Title: 05/11/2016, Day Shift 15:00 – 23:00 (08:00 – 16:00) All times in UTC (PT) Support: Sheila, Jenne, Dave, Jim Incoming Operator: Cheryl Shift Detail Summary: Work continues on recovery of the PSL. Commissioning work during the day as the PSL work allowed. Turn over early to Cheryl, to make an appointment in town.
Jim and Dave
To test the stability of the continuous wave psinject hardware injection, we restarted this program by hand on h1hwinj1. Note the autostart by monit did not work, which we tracked to an accidental activation (patch and/or reboot) of the local firewall blocking EPICS connections. For now we are not running CW under monit control, so if it were to stop it would not be restarted.
A reminder that the CW is an awgstream excitation of the H1:CAL-PINJX_CW_EXC exitation point (channum=25) on h1calex. This excitation is summed with the PCAL excitation signal and sent out via a DAC channel to modulate the PCAL laser.
Had closed N2 and Kr isolation valves ~2 hours prior.
C. Cahillane
I have produced text files containing the All of O1 uncertainty budget.
The text files have frequency vectors between 5 and 3000 Hz. The frequency vector is log spaced and has density of 250 points.
The text files also have GPSTimes between 1126073460 and 1136649540. It is linearly spaced and has about two points per day of O1 (245 points).
The text files have the following format:
First column is the frequency vector.
First row is the GPSTimes.
The rest of the matrix is the Response Function Info. What info is provided is told in the file title.
column 1| columns 2 through 246
row 1 0 | GPSTIMES -->
---------------------------------------------------
|
rows Freq | Response Function Info
2 Vector | (Either R_C02/R_C03 Mag or Phase
through || | or Sigma R_C02 Mag or Phase)
251 || |
\/ |
|
For the LLO All of O1 Uncertainty Text Files, please see LLO aLOG 26104
11:45 am local 1/2 turn open LLCV bypass valve. Took 12:00 min to overfill CP3 today at 20% LLCV open.
Took longer than usual to overfill at 20% open (from nominal 18%) because yesterday during maintenance the CP3 controls were disabled which caused the valve to want to close, except the shims (set to around 18%) kept it open.
Attached are some beam profiles of the high power oscillator taken from around its current working point. m6Clicks.png is 6 clicks (0.6A) lower than the operating point m3Clicks.png is 3 clicks (0.3A) lower than the operating point OperatingPoint1.png is where the laser was before doing these profiles p3Clicks.png is 3 clicks (0.3A) higher than the operating point p6Clicksa.png is 6 clicks (0.6A) higher than the operating point OperatingPoint2.png is back to the operating point again
This morning I started the ETMX Charge measurement. As Sheila mentioned in her log 27102 yesterday, I had to drive to Y-End in order to turn on the HV ESD drivers which had been flipped off presumably during Beckhoff chaos over the last week9??). We also then found that the BIO HI/LO VOLTAGE and HI VOLT DISCONNECT medm switches were OFF when they should be ON. The SDF for these, while looking at the DOWN state is now showing red and in the incorrect state. This SDF is confusing to me, so will sort out with Jenne/Jeff K soon. After switching all of this ON, I was able to run the ETMY SUS charge measurments.
Note, I was able to matlab process the data for both ETMx and ETMy using the controls login, I was not able to run the long trend script on this account. THe situation is worse when I log in as my own user account betsy.weaver (where I don't seem to have permissions to run any scripts in the svn/SusSVN/sus/trunk/QUAD/Common/Scripts directory.
So, will have to beat the streets to get someone else to launch this plotting scripts....
Digital gain for the following PDs that could be useful (unless nothing is connected) have been zero for at least 30 days. The output of these seem to be recorded in the frame, so I set the gains to 1.
H1:PSL-OSC_PD_ISO_DC
H1:PSL-OSC_PD_INT_DC
H1:PSL-OSC_PD_BP_DC
SEI – Working on BRS and filter development Developing Guardian configuration nodes for the end stations (WP #5877) SUS – Running charge measurements on both ETMs VAC – Continuing baking RGA in vertex Several issues with vacuum gauges after yesterday's maintenance Working on a grounding/power problem in LVEA FMC – Beam tube sealing Comm: Waiting for the PSL ISS to be repaired No safety meeting today.
State of H1: reliably locking DRMI, losing lock around REDUCE CARM OFFSET MORE
Commissioners: Sheila
Activities:
FSS, when it needs help relocking, has shown a pretty consistent pattern of:
Cheryl, Sheila
Note: the high votlage for the EY ESD is probably still off, so we will need to go out and switch it on.
I would like to leave them on PID to see if they recover. I'm heading out.
I'll monitor a few times during the night
2109 hrs. local CP5 -> 27% open, 97% full @ ? psig exhaust CP6 -> 71% open, 89% full @ ? psig exhaust 2200 hrs. local CP5 -> 100% open, 88% full @ 1.3 psig exhaust CP6 -> 24% open, 92% full @ 0.2 psig exhaust 2240 hrs. local CP5 -> 44% open, 94% full @ 0.8 psig exhaust CP6 -> 42% open, 90% full @ 0.2 psig exhaust 5/11/2016 0200 hrs. local CP5 -> 6% open, 94% full @ 0.4 psig exhaust CP6 -> 27% open, 91% full @ 0.1 psig exhaust
Jenne told me this afternoon that the laser had tripped. The crystal chiller indicated an error with flow sensor 1. All the flow sensors in the chiller are the vortex style and have no moving parts and are not likely to fail in the same manner as the old turbine ones. My guess is that after ~31k hours of service, it's time to start scheduling a time where we switch the chiller out for the spare and send this unit back to Termotek for servicing - who recommend that the servicing be done annually. This is the second time in about 4 days that the laser has tripped because of this problem.
Tagged this with FRS#5469.
I just pushed a minor upgrade to guardian to fix a small issue with the guardlog client when following node logs. The new version is r1542.
The client was overly buffering stream data from the server, which was causing data from the stream to not be output in a timely manner. This issue should be fixed in the version I just pushed.
As always make sure you have a fresh session to get the new version:
jameson.rollins@operator1:~ 0$ which guardlog /ligo/apps/linux-x86_64/guardian-1542/bin/guardlog jameson.rollins@operator1:~ 0$
Sorry, Sheila. This issue has been fixed now. Just needed to tweak the lockloss script to account for some updated guardlog arguments.
Yes, its working, thank you Jamie.
Since there seem to be some confusions about which PD has what kind of analog filtering and sent to which channel, here it is.
I'm quite certain about HPO output before AOM (which is "Power monitor PD" in D1002929) and ISS 1st loop monitors, but not that sure about "monitor PD"s in D1002164. E-travellers are incomplete (they don't say which one is installed where), so I'm just listing the nominal values for these "monitor PD"s.
What | PD name on D0902114 | Circuit type | Analog out | Transimpedance (Ohm) | Analog filter | Channel | Note | Can you find Filter MEDM from sitemap as of this writing? |
HPO output before AOM | PD1 |
Power monitor PD, D1002929 |
DC | 3.3k DC |
H1:PSL-PWR_HPL_DC, DC_LF |
DC_LF is digital downstream of DC, EPICS output is visible as "Power Monitor PD" on PSL_LASER MEDM. |
No | |
AC | 16.5k AC | 5k HPF nominal | H1:PSL-PWR_HPL_AC | No | ||||
ISS 1st loop diodes after PMC | ISS_PDA, ISS_PDB |
Inner loop diodes, D1001998 |
"Filt" on the board, "AC" on the box | 660 DC |
z=[0.0723;2700;0.0707] Hz, p=[3.3607;130;3.12;2300] |
H1:PSL-ISS_PDA and PDB |
No dewhite, output is calibrated in volts. |
No |
H1:PSL-ISS_PDA_DC and PDB_DC |
Digitally low-passed version of PDA and PDB, but has a DC gain of 5 so the DC agrees with the analog of "DC" output on the PD box. | Yes, from ISS | ||||||
H1:PSL-ISS_PDA_AC and PDB_AC | Dewhitened and AC-coupled version of PDA and PDB, has a gain to match PDA_DC and PDB_DC | Yes, from ISS | ||||||
H1:PSL-ISS_PDA_REL | AC-coupled RIN made by PDA_AC/PDA_DC. | Yes, from ISS | ||||||
DC on the box | 3.3k DC | N/A | N/A | |||||
Frontend output before HPO but after FI | PD_AMP | DC on the box | 20k DC nominal | H1:PSL-OSC_PD_AMP_DC | EPICS output visible as "FRONTEND POWER" on PSL_LASER MEDM. | No | ||
AC on the box | 100k AC nominal | 5k HPF nominal | AMP_AC | No | ||||
Back-propagation rejected by FI between frontend and HPO | PD_ISO | PSL monitor PD, D1002164, T100047 | DC | 750 DC nominal | H1:PSL-OSC_PD_ISO_DC | EPICS output visible as "PDISO" on PSL_LASER MEDM. | No | |
AC | 3.75k nominal | 5k HPF nominal | ISO_AC | No | ||||
Back-propagating HPO mode leaking from HPO cavity? | PD_INT | PSL monitor PD, D1002164, T100047 | DC | 1k? | H1:PSL-OSC_PD_INT_DC | EPICS output visible as "PDINT" on PSL_LASER MEDM. | No | |
AC | 5k? | 5k HPF nominal | INT_AC | No | ||||
HPO Brewster plate rejection | PD_BP | PSL monitor PD, D1002164, T100047 | DC | 1.5k nominal | H1:PSL-OSC_PD_BP_DC | EPICS output visible as "PDBP" on PSL_LASER MEDM. | No | |
AC | 7.5k nominal | 5k HPF nominal | BP_AC | No |
I cannot edit the above entry any more, so here is an additional table showing digital filters.
what | analog | channel | model | digital | ||
HPO output before AOM | DC | H1:PSL-PWR_HPL_DC | h1pslpmc | None | ||
H1:PSL-PWR_HPL_DC_LP | p=0.05 | |||||
AC | H1:PSL-PWR_HPL_AC | None | ||||
ISS 1st loop diodes after PMC |
"filt" or AC (DC-coupled) |
H1:PSL-ISS_PDA (and PDB) | h1psliss | cts/volt conversion factor | ||
H1:PSL-ISS_PDA_CALI_AC |
z= [0.0707, 0.0723], p= [0.3, 0.3] and 2nd order 0.3Hz Butterworth HP in addition to dewhite, DC gain of 5. |
|||||
H1:PSL-ISS_PDA_CALI_DC | Some random LPF (p=[0.034141, 0.037449, 10430]), DC gain of 5. | |||||
H1:PSL-ISS_PDA_REL | None | |||||
Frontend output before HPO but after FI | DC | H1:PSL-OSC_PD_AMP_DC | h1pslpmc | Gain of 0.00349223 | ||
AC | H1:PSL-OSC_PD_AMP_AC | Gain of 0.000613 | ||||
Back-propagation rejected by FI between frontend and HPO | DC | H1:PSL-OSC_PD_ISO_DC | Gain set to 1 on May 11 2016 (alog 27112) | |||
AC | H1:PSL-OSC_PD_ISO_AC | Gain of 1 | ||||
Back-propagating HPO mode leaking from HPO cavity? | DC | H1:PSL-OSC_PD_INT_DC | Gain set to 1 on May 11 2016 (alog 27112) | |||
AC | H1:PSL-OSC_PD_INT_AC | Gain of 1 | ||||
HPO Brewster plate rejection | DC | H1:PSL-OSC_PD_BP_DC | Gain set to 1 on May 11 2016 (alog 27112) | |||
AC | H1:PSL-OSC_PD_BP_AC | Gain of 1 | ||||
PMC TRANS | ? | H1:PSL-PWR_PMC_TRANS | Gain of 0.0103, p=0.15 | |||
PMC REFL DC | ? | H1:PSL-PWR_PMC_REFL | Gain of -0.0248015, p=0.15 |
ISS inner loop (or 1st loop) diode has different filter than written above, it turns out. But 130Hz was a zero, not pole. 2.7k was a pole, not zero.
effective trans impedance = 660 Ohm (that's 0.2*3.3k).
z=[0.0707; 0.0723; 130]
p=[3.12; 3.36; 2.34k; 2.70k]
Tagging DetChar, IOO, and ISC for future reference.
Seems like I was really, really tired, here's a correction of correction. Really sorry for the confusion.
My original table was correct.
Inner loop PD is equivalen of 660Ohm, zp=([0.0707;0.0723;2.7k],[3.12;3.36;130;2.34k]).