Displaying reports 56601-56620 of 82999.Go to page Start 2827 2828 2829 2830 2831 2832 2833 2834 2835 End
Reports until 15:54, Wednesday 11 May 2016
H1 AOS (CDS, ISC)
ross.kennedy@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:54, Wednesday 11 May 2016 (27123)
Testing fixed phase oscillators

Ross, Tega, Dave Barker, Joe Betzwieser, Jeff K

We have been using the new fixed phase oscillators on the h1omcpi and h1susetmxpi models. There was an ititial problem where there was an arbitrary phase mismatch between the two oscillators when viewing the two in a time series  in dtt. This was fixed after we realised that the h1omcpi model had not been restarted after the new oscillators were included. After restarting this model they both now seem to be in phase with each other. We will be using these oscillators for the down/up conversion of the omc dcpd signal with the intention of using it for damping PI modes using the ESD at ETMX. I've included an image of the the dtt timeseries data of the two oscillator outputs where the second has twice the gain of the first. Documentation on the new oscillators can be found here https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-T1600143

Images attached to this report
H1 General
jeffrey.bartlett@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:38, Wednesday 11 May 2016 (27124)
Ops Day Shift Summary

Title:  05/11/2016, Day Shift 15:00 – 23:00 (08:00 – 16:00) All times in UTC (PT)
State of H1: IFO unlocked.  
Commissioning: 
Outgoing Operator: N/A
 
Activity Log: All Times in UTC (PT)

15:00 (08:00) Start of shift
15:30 (08:30) Peter – Working in the PSL 
16:02 (09:02) Betsy – Going to End-Y to turn on ESD high power
16:03 (09:03) Joe – Going to End-Y for inventory checks
16:15 (09:15) Jason – Going into the PSL
16:20 (09:20) Betsy – Back from End-Y
16:48 (09:48) Joe – Back from End-Y
16:50 (09:50) Joe – Going into the LAVE for inventory checks
17:07 (10:07) Joe – Out of the LVEA
17:45 (10:45) Jason & Peter – Out of the PSL
17:50 (10:50) Joe – Moving pumps from Mechanical building
18:00 (11:00) Kyle – Going into LVEA vertex to check RGA
18:07 (11:07) Peter & Jason – Working in the PSL
18:15 (11:15) Chandra – Going to both end stations to get parts and tools
18:20 (11:20) Joe – Out of the LVEA
18:20 (11:20) Kyle – Out of the LVEA
18:50 (11:50) Corey – Going into the Squeezer Bay 
19:11 (12:11) Chandra – Back from end stations
20:09 (13:09) Kyle – Going into LVEA to turn off RGA heat
20:14 (13:14) Kyle – Out of the LVEA
20:16 (13:16) Take IFO to DRMI_LOCKED for Sheila
21:42 (14:42) IFO down for PSL work
21:55 (14:55) Dave – Restarting the OMC PI model
21:57 (14:57) Filiberto – Going into the LVEA to check IO table panels
22:00 (15:00) Jason & Peter – In the PSL enclosure working on the ISS 
 
End of Shift Summary:

Title: 05/11/2016, Day Shift 15:00 – 23:00 (08:00 – 16:00) All times in UTC (PT)
Support: Sheila, Jenne, Dave, Jim
Incoming Operator: Cheryl 

Shift Detail Summary: Work continues on recovery of the PSL. Commissioning work during the day as the PSL work allowed. Turn over early to Cheryl, to make an appointment in town.    

H1 CDS (INJ)
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:18, Wednesday 11 May 2016 (27122)
CW (psinject) hardware injection excitations running on h1calex

Jim and Dave

To test the stability of the continuous wave psinject hardware injection, we restarted this program by hand on h1hwinj1. Note the autostart by monit did not work, which we tracked to an accidental activation (patch and/or reboot) of the local firewall blocking EPICS connections. For now we are not running CW under monit control, so if it were to stop it would not be restarted.

A reminder that the CW is an awgstream excitation of the H1:CAL-PINJX_CW_EXC exitation point (channum=25) on h1calex. This excitation is summed with the PCAL excitation signal and sent out via a DAC channel to modulate the PCAL laser.

LHO VE
kyle.ryan@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:38, Wednesday 11 May 2016 (27121)
1315 hrs local -> starting cool down of Vertex RGA
Had closed N2 and Kr isolation valves ~2 hours prior.
H1 CAL (CAL)
craig.cahillane@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:13, Wednesday 11 May 2016 (27120)
All of O1 LHO Uncertainty Budget Text Files
C. Cahillane

I have produced text files containing the All of O1 uncertainty budget.
The text files have frequency vectors between 5 and 3000 Hz.  The frequency vector is log spaced and has density of 250 points.
The text files also have GPSTimes between 1126073460 and 1136649540.  It is linearly spaced and has about two points per day of O1 (245 points). 

The text files have the following format:
First column is the frequency vector.
First row is the GPSTimes.
The rest of the matrix is the Response Function Info.  What info is provided is told in the file title.


        column 1| columns 2 through 246
row 1       0   |       GPSTIMES -->
---------------------------------------------------
                |
rows      Freq  | Response Function Info
2        Vector | (Either R_C02/R_C03 Mag or Phase
through    ||   |  or Sigma R_C02 Mag or Phase)
251        ||   |
           \/   |
                |


For the LLO All of O1 Uncertainty Text Files, please see LLO aLOG 26104
Non-image files attached to this report
LHO VE
chandra.romel@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:12, Wednesday 11 May 2016 - last comment - 16:22, Wednesday 11 May 2016(27119)
CP3 overfill
11:45 am local

1/2 turn open LLCV bypass valve. Took 12:00 min to overfill CP3 today at 20% LLCV open. 
Comments related to this report
chandra.romel@LIGO.ORG - 16:22, Wednesday 11 May 2016 (27125)
Took longer than usual to overfill at 20% open (from nominal 18%) because yesterday during maintenance the CP3 controls were disabled which caused the valve to want to close, except the shims (set to around 18%) kept it open. 
H1 PSL (PSL)
peter.king@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:11, Wednesday 11 May 2016 (27118)
High Power Oscillator Beam Profiles
Attached are some beam profiles of the high power oscillator taken from around its current
working point.

m6Clicks.png is 6 clicks (0.6A) lower than the operating point
m3Clicks.png is 3 clicks (0.3A) lower than the operating point
OperatingPoint1.png is where the laser was before doing these profiles
p3Clicks.png is 3 clicks (0.3A) higher than the operating point
p6Clicksa.png is 6 clicks (0.6A) higher than the operating point
OperatingPoint2.png is back to the operating point again
Images attached to this report
H1 SUS
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:45, Wednesday 11 May 2016 - last comment - 11:11, Wednesday 11 May 2016(27115)
Started SUS ETM charge measurements - turned on HV PS at ETMY

This morning I started the ETMX Charge measurement.  As Sheila mentioned in her log 27102 yesterday, I had to drive to Y-End in order to turn on the HV ESD drivers which had been flipped off presumably during Beckhoff chaos over the last week9??).  We also then found that the BIO HI/LO VOLTAGE and HI VOLT DISCONNECT medm switches were OFF when they should be ON.  The SDF for these, while looking at the DOWN state is now showing red and in the incorrect state.  This SDF is confusing to me, so will sort out with Jenne/Jeff K soon.  After switching all of this ON, I was able to run the ETMY SUS charge measurments.

Comments related to this report
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - 11:11, Wednesday 11 May 2016 (27116)

Note, I was able to matlab process the data for both ETMx and ETMy using the controls login, I was not able to run the long trend script on this account.  THe situation is worse when I log in as my own user account betsy.weaver (where I don't seem to have permissions to run any scripts in the svn/SusSVN/sus/trunk/QUAD/Common/Scripts directory.

So, will have to beat the streets to get someone else to launch this plotting scripts....

H1 PSL
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:55, Wednesday 11 May 2016 (27112)
PSL monitor diode digital gains

Digital gain for the following PDs that could be useful (unless nothing is connected) have been zero for at least 30 days. The output of these seem to be recorded in the frame, so I set the gains to 1.

H1:PSL-OSC_PD_ISO_DC

H1:PSL-OSC_PD_INT_DC

H1:PSL-OSC_PD_BP_DC

H1 General
jeffrey.bartlett@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:22, Wednesday 11 May 2016 (27111)
08:30 Meeting Minutes
SEI – Working on BRS and filter development
	 Developing Guardian configuration nodes for the end stations (WP #5877)

SUS – Running charge measurements on both ETMs

VAC – Continuing baking RGA in vertex
	   Several issues with vacuum gauges after yesterday's maintenance
	   Working on a grounding/power problem in LVEA

FMC – Beam tube sealing
	       
Comm: Waiting for the PSL ISS to be repaired

No safety meeting today.	
H1 General
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:59, Tuesday 10 May 2016 (27108)
Eve Ops Summary: locking, not making it to ENGAGE ASC

State of H1: reliably locking DRMI, losing lock around REDUCE CARM OFFSET MORE

 

Commissioners: Sheila

 

Activities:

FSS, when it needs help relocking, has shown a pretty consistent pattern of:

H1 ISC
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:40, Tuesday 10 May 2016 (27107)
some locking attempts tonight

Cheryl, Sheila

Note: the high votlage for the EY ESD is probably still off, so we will need to go out and switch it on.  

Images attached to this report
LHO VE
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 19:44, Tuesday 10 May 2016 - last comment - 02:08, Wednesday 11 May 2016(27105)
Someone might want to watch CP5 and CP6
I would like to leave them on PID to see if they recover. I'm heading out.
Comments related to this report
kyle.ryan@LIGO.ORG - 21:00, Tuesday 10 May 2016 (27106)
I'll monitor a few times during the night
kyle.ryan@LIGO.ORG - 02:08, Wednesday 11 May 2016 (27109)
2109 hrs. local 
CP5 -> 27% open, 97% full @ ? psig exhaust 
CP6 -> 71% open, 89% full @ ? psig exhaust 

2200 hrs. local 
CP5 -> 100% open, 88% full @ 1.3 psig exhaust 
CP6 -> 24% open, 92% full @ 0.2 psig exhaust 

2240 hrs. local 
CP5 -> 44% open, 94% full @ 0.8 psig exhaust 
CP6 -> 42% open, 90% full @ 0.2 psig exhaust 

5/11/2016 
0200 hrs. local 
CP5 -> 6% open, 94% full @ 0.4 psig exhaust 
CP6 -> 27% open, 91% full @ 0.1 psig exhaust 
H1 PSL (PSL)
peter.king@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:44, Tuesday 10 May 2016 - last comment - 10:36, Wednesday 11 May 2016(27098)
laser trip
Jenne told me this afternoon that the laser had tripped.  The crystal chiller indicated an error with
flow sensor 1.  All the flow sensors in the chiller are the vortex style and have no moving parts
and are not likely to fail in the same manner as the old turbine ones.  My guess is that after ~31k
hours of service, it's time to start scheduling a time where we switch the chiller out for the spare
and send this unit back to Termotek for servicing - who recommend that the servicing be done annually.

    This is the second time in about 4 days that the laser has tripped because of this problem.
Comments related to this report
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 10:36, Wednesday 11 May 2016 (27114)

Tagged this with FRS#5469.

H1 GRD
jameson.rollins@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:51, Friday 06 May 2016 - last comment - 12:01, Wednesday 11 May 2016(27046)
minor guardian update to fix minor log viewing issue

I just pushed a minor upgrade to guardian to fix a small issue with the guardlog client when following node logs.  The new version is r1542.

The client was overly buffering stream data from the server, which was causing data from the stream to not be output in a timely manner.  This issue should be fixed in the version I just pushed.

As always make sure you have a fresh session to get the new version:

jameson.rollins@operator1:~ 0$ which guardlog
/ligo/apps/linux-x86_64/guardian-1542/bin/guardlog
jameson.rollins@operator1:~ 0$ 

Comments related to this report
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 17:02, Tuesday 10 May 2016 (27099)
sheila.dwyer@operator1:~/StripTools$ lockloss select
usage: guardlog [-h] [-a TIME] [-b TIME] [-c TIME] [-d S] [-o H] [-t] [-n]
                [-u | -l | -g | -r | -p] [-x]
                NODE [NODE ...]
guardlog: error: unrecognized arguments: --dump
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/ligo/cds/userscripts/lockloss", line 408, in
    args.func(args)
  File "/ligo/cds/userscripts/lockloss", line 259, in cmd_select
    selected = select_lockloss_time(index=args.index, tz=args.tz)
  File "/ligo/cds/userscripts/lockloss", line 140, in select_lockloss_time
    times = list(get_guard_lockloss_events())[::-1]
  File "/ligo/cds/userscripts/lockloss", line 107, in get_guard_lockloss_events
    output = subprocess.check_output(cmd, shell=True)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/subprocess.py", line 544, in check_output
    raise CalledProcessError(retcode, cmd, output=output)
subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command 'guardlog --dump --today ISC_LOCK' returned non-zero exit status 2
sheila.dwyer@operator1:~/StripTools$ which guardlog
/ligo/apps/linux-x86_64/guardian-1542/bin/guardlog
sheila.dwyer@operator1:~/StripTools$ 
It seems like there is a problem accessing the guardian logs again, I wonder if its related to this update or not.  I don't know if anyone had tried to look at locklosses since the update. 
 
sheila.dwyer@operator1:~/StripTools$ lockloss select
usage: guardlog [-h] [-a TIME] [-b TIME] [-c TIME] [-d S] [-o H] [-t] [-n]
                [-u | -l | -g | -r | -p] [-x]
                NODE [NODE ...]
guardlog: error: unrecognized arguments: --dump
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/ligo/cds/userscripts/lockloss", line 408, in
    args.func(args)
  File "/ligo/cds/userscripts/lockloss", line 259, in cmd_select
    selected = select_lockloss_time(index=args.index, tz=args.tz)
  File "/ligo/cds/userscripts/lockloss", line 140, in select_lockloss_time
    times = list(get_guard_lockloss_events())[::-1]
  File "/ligo/cds/userscripts/lockloss", line 107, in get_guard_lockloss_events
    output = subprocess.check_output(cmd, shell=True)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/subprocess.py", line 544, in check_output
    raise CalledProcessError(retcode, cmd, output=output)
subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command 'guardlog --dump --today ISC_LOCK' returned non-zero exit status 2
sheila.dwyer@operator1:~/StripTools$ which guardlog
/ligo/apps/linux-x86_64/guardian-1542/bin/guardlog
sheila.dwyer@operator1:~/StripTools$ 
 
jameson.rollins@LIGO.ORG - 07:25, Wednesday 11 May 2016 (27110)

Sorry, Sheila.  This issue has been fixed now.  Just needed to tweak the lockloss script to account for some updated guardlog arguments.

sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 12:01, Wednesday 11 May 2016 (27117)

Yes, its working, thank you Jamie.  

H1 PSL
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:30, Friday 29 April 2016 - last comment - 12:52, Thursday 01 September 2016(26879)
Which PSL monitor PDs correspond to which signal, and which DCC document.

Since there seem to be some confusions about which PD has what kind of analog filtering and sent to which channel, here it is.

I'm quite certain about HPO output before AOM (which is "Power monitor PD" in D1002929) and ISS 1st loop monitors, but not that sure about "monitor PD"s in D1002164. E-travellers are incomplete (they don't say which one is installed where), so I'm just listing the nominal values for these "monitor PD"s.

What PD name on D0902114 Circuit type Analog out Transimpedance (Ohm) Analog filter Channel Note Can you find Filter MEDM from sitemap as of this writing?
HPO output before AOM PD1

Power monitor PD, D1002929

DC 3.3k DC  

H1:PSL-PWR_HPL_DC, DC_LF

DC_LF is digital downstream of DC, EPICS output is visible as "Power Monitor PD" on PSL_LASER MEDM.

No
AC 16.5k AC 5k HPF nominal H1:PSL-PWR_HPL_AC   No
ISS 1st loop diodes after PMC ISS_PDA, ISS_PDB

Inner loop diodes, D1001998

"Filt" on the board, "AC" on the box 660 DC

z=[0.0723;2700;0.0707] Hz,

p=[3.3607;130;3.12;2300]

H1:PSL-ISS_PDA and PDB

No dewhite, output is calibrated in volts.

No

H1:PSL-ISS_PDA_DC and PDB_DC

Digitally low-passed version of PDA and PDB, but has a DC gain of 5 so the DC agrees with the analog of "DC" output on the PD box. Yes, from ISS
H1:PSL-ISS_PDA_AC and PDB_AC Dewhitened and AC-coupled version of PDA and PDB, has a gain to match PDA_DC and PDB_DC Yes, from ISS
H1:PSL-ISS_PDA_REL AC-coupled RIN made by PDA_AC/PDA_DC. Yes, from ISS
DC on the box 3.3k DC   N/A   N/A
Frontend output before HPO but after FI PD_AMP

PSL monitor PD, D1002164, T100047

DC on the box 20k DC nominal   H1:PSL-OSC_PD_AMP_DC EPICS output visible as "FRONTEND POWER" on PSL_LASER MEDM. No
AC on the box 100k AC nominal 5k HPF nominal AMP_AC   No
Back-propagation rejected by FI between frontend and HPO PD_ISO PSL monitor PD, D1002164, T100047 DC 750 DC nominal   H1:PSL-OSC_PD_ISO_DC EPICS output visible as "PDISO" on PSL_LASER MEDM. No
AC 3.75k nominal 5k HPF nominal ISO_AC   No
Back-propagating HPO mode leaking from HPO cavity? PD_INT PSL monitor PD,  D1002164, T100047 DC 1k?   H1:PSL-OSC_PD_INT_DC EPICS output visible as "PDINT" on PSL_LASER MEDM. No
AC 5k? 5k HPF nominal INT_AC   No
HPO Brewster plate rejection PD_BP PSL monitor PD, D1002164, T100047 DC 1.5k nominal   H1:PSL-OSC_PD_BP_DC EPICS output visible as "PDBP" on PSL_LASER MEDM. No
AC 7.5k nominal 5k HPF nominal BP_AC   No
Comments related to this report
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - 10:07, Wednesday 11 May 2016 (27113)

I cannot edit the above entry any more, so here is an additional table showing digital filters.

what analog channel model digital
HPO output before AOM DC H1:PSL-PWR_HPL_DC h1pslpmc None
  H1:PSL-PWR_HPL_DC_LP p=0.05
AC H1:PSL-PWR_HPL_AC None
ISS 1st loop diodes after PMC "filt" or AC
(DC-coupled)
H1:PSL-ISS_PDA (and PDB) h1psliss cts/volt conversion factor
  H1:PSL-ISS_PDA_CALI_AC

z= [0.0707, 0.0723], p= [0.3, 0.3] and 2nd order 0.3Hz Butterworth HP in addition to dewhite, DC gain of 5.

  H1:PSL-ISS_PDA_CALI_DC Some random LPF (p=[0.034141, 0.037449, 10430]), DC gain of 5.
    H1:PSL-ISS_PDA_REL None
Frontend output before HPO but after FI DC H1:PSL-OSC_PD_AMP_DC h1pslpmc Gain of 0.00349223
AC H1:PSL-OSC_PD_AMP_AC Gain of 0.000613
Back-propagation rejected by FI between frontend and HPO DC H1:PSL-OSC_PD_ISO_DC Gain set to 1 on May 11 2016 (alog 27112)
AC H1:PSL-OSC_PD_ISO_AC Gain of 1
Back-propagating HPO mode leaking from HPO cavity? DC H1:PSL-OSC_PD_INT_DC Gain set to 1 on May 11 2016 (alog 27112)
AC H1:PSL-OSC_PD_INT_AC Gain of 1
HPO Brewster plate rejection DC H1:PSL-OSC_PD_BP_DC Gain set to 1 on May 11 2016 (alog 27112)
AC H1:PSL-OSC_PD_BP_AC Gain of 1
PMC TRANS ? H1:PSL-PWR_PMC_TRANS Gain of 0.0103, p=0.15
PMC REFL DC ? H1:PSL-PWR_PMC_REFL Gain of -0.0248015, p=0.15
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - 15:44, Tuesday 30 August 2016 (29392)

ISS inner loop (or 1st loop) diode has different filter than written above, it turns out. But 130Hz was a zero, not pole. 2.7k was a pole, not zero.

effective trans impedance = 660 Ohm (that's 0.2*3.3k).

z=[0.0707; 0.0723; 130]

p=[3.12; 3.36; 2.34k; 2.70k]

jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 08:45, Wednesday 31 August 2016 (29409)DetChar, IOO, ISC
Tagging DetChar, IOO, and ISC for future reference.
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - 12:52, Thursday 01 September 2016 (29441)

Seems like I was really, really tired, here's a correction of correction. Really sorry for the confusion.

My original table was correct.

Inner loop PD is equivalen of 660Ohm, zp=([0.0707;0.0723;2.7k],[3.12;3.36;130;2.34k]).

Displaying reports 56601-56620 of 82999.Go to page Start 2827 2828 2829 2830 2831 2832 2833 2834 2835 End