Overall message:
More about CSOFT PIT:
We were using a control filter that had a pair of complex zero compensating the 0.4 Hz resonance, which meant we had very little gain to supress the instability using ASC. I changed this to a single real zero, which gives us 20 dB gain at the instability frequency. The filter comparison is attached, and a measurement taken at 2 Watts. In the green measurement I had made a msitake in the filter at 1.5 Hz, the red measurement is with this fixed and the phase should be unchanged from the old design at these frequencies.
Here are some plots to illustrate the alignment progress described in Jenne's alog 29457
The first attachment shows various powers plotted against input power for a power up with the old PRC alignment (blue) and the new PRC alingment (orange).
You can see that we are still loosing recycling gain as we power up, but less so than with the old alignment. We know that we can move the PR2/POP offsets a bit more; we stopped where we did last night because we started to rail the POP PZT and had to realign on the in air table. You can also see that the sideband powers are not dropping quite as much as with the old alignment, although we start with POP 18 lower.
The bottom row shows REFL normalized by the input power; the plot below shows normalized refl power vs recycling gain. (Time during the power up goes from right to left on this plot). You can see that as the alingment gets worse the interferometer is approaching critically coupled, with the old PRC alignment the reflected power starts to increase again for recycling gains below about 27.
After one of the locklosses in the morning the IMC would not relock. Clearing some of the IMC WFS DOF histories brought it back. I often had to adjust the BS in pitch to lock on DRMI. At some point the X arm alignment ended up such that engaging the WFS would drive the green alignment off. Jenne and I trended the optical levers back for ITMX and ETMX and tried bringing these optics back to those values. This did not seem to help so Jenne suggested that I go through an initial alignment. I did and was able to lock both arms on green without difficulty after that. After the initial alignment we kept losing lock engaging the DRMI ASC loops. Jenne and I stopped at LOCK_DRMI_1F and minimized the ASC loop error signals by hand. Eventually this allowed us to move on. 16:26 UTC Betsy to LVEA west bay 16:31 UTC Kyle to LVEA to take RGA scans 16:51 UTC Betsy done 17:48 UTC Kyle back, not able to take RGA scans 18:51 UTC Chris sending excitation to ITMX 18:53 UTC Kyle back 20:14 UTC Chris sending excitation to ITMX 21:40 UTC Kyle retrieved computer from LVEA 21:49 UTC Starting initial alignment 22:14 UTC Done initial alignment 22:42 UTC Kyle to mid Y to fill CP3
The laser tripped again. Suspected cause is the same as the trip from earlier this morning.
Maintenance Tuesday will most likely be quite invasive.
~1550 - 1615 hrs. local -> Kyle to and from Y-mid Opened exhaust check-valve bypass-valve, opened LLCV bypass-valve 1/2 turn -> LN2 @ exhaust in 18 minutes 28 seconds -> restored valves to as found configuration. NOTE: I increased CP3's LLCV %open value from 20% to 21% in response to the time needed to fill today
I've been looking at the changes in H1 alignment during O1 (13 August 2015 to 5 January 2016) and after O1 (post O1, 5 January 2016 to 27 August 2016).
The chart below shows changes in MC1 alignment drives and OSEM readbacks for pitch and yaw for both time periods.
During O1, MC1 OSEMs change by 33urad and 52urad, pitch and yaw, while the alignment drives change 12urad and 24urad, pitch and yaw.
Post O1, MC1 OSEMs change by 10urad* and 25urad, pitch and yaw, while the alignment drives change 82urad and 46urad, pitch and yaw.
| O1 | post O1 | |
| MC1 alignment drive - delta PITCH | 12urad | 82urad |
| MC1 OSEM readback - delta PITCH | 33urad | 10urad* |
| MC1 alignment drive - delta YAW | 24urad | 46urad |
| MC1 OSEM readback - delta YAW | 52urad | 25urad |
* MC1 OSEM readback for post O1 max - min = 95urad
I'm using MC1 as the measure of the PSL beam pointing, since MC1 is servo'd to center the beam on MC2.
However, the MC1 signal also contains information about the relative positions of HAM2 and HAM3.
HAM3 oplev shows essentially no change in position.
HAM2 oplev shows -26urad change in pitch, and -10urad change in yaw for 45 of the 145 days.
HAM2 oplev yaw was railled at -39 until November, an then shows a real signal. Using the 45 days of good data, and applying the change to during that time to the 145 days of O1, the change in HAM2 yaw is -29urad.
Combining MC1 alignment changes and HAM2 alignment changes (measured and calculated):
| MC1 O1 change in pitch | +33urad |
| HAM2 O1 change in pitch | -26urad |
| total change in pitch | +7urad |
| MC1 O1 change in yaw | +52urad |
| HAM2 O1 change in yaw | -29urad |
| total change in yaw | +33urad |
This suggests the input pointing of the PSL beam changed by +7urad in pitch and +33urad in yaw during O1.
Jenne, Sheila, Patrick While at ENGAGE_REFL_POP_WFS we took the ISI configuration state from windy to earthquake. This made the cavity power buildup signals noticeably worse. We therefore took the ISI configuration state back to windy. This occurred around 18:12 UTC.
These are the 7 day trends for the OpLevs. FAMIS Task #4691.
The pump diode current readout for diode box 3 has been mis-behaving for a while now. This time it was caught in the
act. The set diode current is 50.2 A. The readout is clearly wrong, not least of which the power supplies cannot
deliver more than ~65 A but also the laser power does not vary during this time.
Might be an intermittent fault with the Beckhoff terminal that reads the output of the power supply.
Please when the laser trips, disable the locking for the PMC, FSS, and ISS. It doesn't make much sense to keep ramping the NPRO PZT when there's no chance of any of the cavities acquiring lock.
It would be best to write a guardian to do this if it is necessary. There are not always people here when the laser trips.
I added a few lines to the LASER_PWR Guardian so that when this node goes to FAULT from a lack of light, then it will turn OFF the autolockers for the FSS, PMC, ISS in that order.
CDS: Continuation of framewriter debugging Tues: reinstall common mode board SEI: Tues: offload BS HEPI DC bias to large springs VAC: h0vaclx restarted to fix annulus ion pump channels. Richard reset ITM ESD high voltage. Kyle turning off pumps
When CO2Y laser had an issue (alog2856) I added a 1 degree offset to the rotation stage calibration to trick it to deliver the right amount of power. That offset has been removed and the CO2Y RS now delivers the right power again.
For higher accuracy the RS random walk script has to be run.
Attached is a capture of the PSL's TwinCAT status screen. Same problem as previously, namely a flow error in the
AMP cooling circuit.
In bring the laser back up, I took the opportunity to reboot h1pslctrl0. This has temporarily fixed the problem
with the diode current readout of diode box 3.
Attached are zoomed in plots of the flow rates and pressures. Note an oscillation is present in the flow rate
signals, which might be indicative of something "flapping" in the water flow. A plot of the laser head flow
rates is also attached. The flow through the laser heads is not the problem, at least not this time.
In looking at the pressure fluctuations, it looks like they start in the inlet side before appearing
in the outlet side. Both have appear to have a period of 1s, although this might be an artifact of the
sampling/recording of the trend data.
A quick visual inspection of the filters in the chiller room didn't reveal any new debris.
[Sheila, Jenne, Kiwamu, Terra]
We have reset the initial alignment offsets, including realigning several paths on ISCT1, to match the alignment that we liked from yesterday (alog 29430). So far, we think that it's good. We have powered up part way twice since, and the power recycling gain no longer drops very much! It still drops a bit, so we could consider going a bit farther, but this is probably plenty good to move on and focus entirely on low noise efforts. Now at 40W it is something like 31, rather than something in the mid/low twenties. Plots coming tomorrow.
In order to do this, we did the following (hardware alignment changes noted in bold):
1st screenshot: powering up from 2 watts to 32 Watts without loosing recycling gain. The POP18 build up still drops, but AS90 is much more stable than with previous alignments. According to the POP/IM4 monitor, this is a recycling gain of over 32 at 32 Watts, calculated from the arm transmissions it is a recycling gain of 34.4
2nd screenshot: Slider values for new alignment.
3rd screenshot: Modification to CSOFT pit filter to add phase and gain around 0.4 Hz, the frequency of the dPdtheta instabilty. On the right side of that screenshot is a measurement of the loop, taken with the digital gain set to 0.1. The nominal gain used for the references was a factor of 5 higher and we have now restored the loop to that gain. We can probably get more supression of the instability out of this loop.
Apart from the recycling gain, we seem to see a slight improvement in the beam shape at the dark port after the PR2 move. The below are camera images of the AS port a few days ago and today, respectively
A concentric circle pattern (with circle pattern's center at around x,y = 350,270) became dimmer. Note that the old image was taken about 17 min. after the interferometer had reached 50 W, while the latest image was taken a few minutes after a 50 W lock. Also, the third attachment shows a comparison of the horizontal beam profile around the center in which the latest picture shows less significant features.
Not that this is a surprise or anything, but I was noticing that the light on the OMC trans camera changes noticeably as the IFO thermalizes.
I've temporarily increased the exposure of the camera to 7000 (usually 569). You can't see much at 2W, but you start to see it at 20W and 35W - again not so surprising. What is perhaps more interesting is the way the light there changes after we've been at 50W for a while. The titles of the attachments include how long we were at each power. All images were taken during the same lock, so the 2 min at 50W image is after 5 min at 20W, and then 5 min at 35W, so it's not straight 2W->50W on this acquisition.
Since the original images are .tiffs, I've included a screenshot of all 6 images. Top row, left to right: 2W, 5min@20W, 5min@35W. Bottom row, left to right: 2min@50W, 6min@50W, 30+min@50W.
From the picture @2min 50W, I could see that this mode is probably one of the 9th-order modes.
I made the attached HOM map, based on the transverse mode spacing (TMS) of this OMC, measured during the final test.
It is likely that this 9th order mode is +9MHz sideband.
In order to try to push this mode away from the resonance, you can tune the DC voltage of the OMC PZT.
There must be two or three carrier TEM00 resonances in the OMC PZT range (0~100V) as one FSR corresponds to ~40V of the PZT voltage.
Choose the lowest voltage one. The DC voltage of the PZT changes the curvature of an OMC mirror and then the TMS by about 10ppm/V.
(Increasing the PZT voltage will not give us a good solution. It causes 10th -45MHz (cyan) mode comes into the resonance.)
You may already be at the lowest resonance, or the lowering the operating PZT voltage may not be enough to push the resonance away.
If this resonant HOM is still problematic, we need to reduce the leakage 9MHz sidebands from the interferometer.
[Sheila, Jenne]
We now lock the OMC on the carrier with the lowest PZT voltage possible, which is about 20V. We used to be locking with about 60V. It's not yet clear if this is enough of a change - we need to do some intensity noise coupling measurements with both lock points.
Here are some camera images though. Recall that in the last alog (29395) we spent some time at medium PSL powers before going up to 50W, so the total IFO thermal state isn't the same when we first arrive at 50W. The top row of images is from one lock, and the second row is from a different lock, although the times since arriving at 50W are accurate in the image titles. Top left is 2W DC Readout, then just after getting to 50W, then 2 min and 5 min at 50W. In a different lock the second row shows 35 and 45 minutes after arriving at 50W.
Posting Jenne's pictures for comment above
S. Dwyer, J. Kissel, C. Gray After successfully recovering the IMC's VCO and recovering the IMC (29264), we were able to get up through LOCKING_ARMS_GREEN in the lock acquisition sequence. However, we found that ALS COMM failed caused lock losses during the next step (LOCKING_ALS), when the input for IMC length control in its Common Mode Chassis was switched from the IMC's PDH output to the ALS COMM PLL output. The ALS COMM PLL output is connected to IN2 of the IMC chassis that had a new daughter board installed in the star-crossed ISC rack H1-ISC-R1 today (LHO aLOG 29250). After fighting through MEDM screen confusion* at the racks, we found that OUT2 (an analog pickoff pick-off just after the input gain circuit) indicated a ~2.5 [V] offset, even with IN2 terminated with 50 [Ohms]. Suspecting that this symptom was indicative that the input gain circuit (circled in red in MEDM screen capture) was yet another causality of the unfortunate rack power mishap today (LHO aLOG 29253), we've replaced the entire chassis (which lives in U14 of H1-ISC-R1) with a spare we found in the EE shop -- S/N S1102627 (or Board S/N S1102627MC). Notably, this spare does not have one of the new daughter boards on which Chris has worked so hard. We're not suggesting this swap be permanent, but we make the swap for tonight at least, so we can hopefully make forward progress. We suggest that IN2 and/or the input gain stage of SN S1102626 be fixed tomorrow, and the chassis restored so we can employ the new daughter board. Other Details: - Before removing the chassis, we powered down the entire rack using the voltage sequencer around the back at the top of the rack. - After installing the rack, we were sure to have all cables connected appropriately before turning the rack power on again (via the sequencer again). - We added a few labels to the IMC's PDH output and the ALS COMM PLL output cables such that they're easier to follow and reconnect in the future. *MEDM Screen Confusion -- whether IN1 or IN2 is fed into OUT2 of all common mode chassis is selectable on their MEDM screens. For the IMC's common mode board (at least for SN S1102626), the MEDM screen's indication of the status of that switch is exactly backwards. When the screen indicates that IN1 is feeding OUT2, IN2 is feeding OUT2, and vice versa. #facepalm
With Sheila's help, the OUT 2 switch should now be correct for the MC Common Mode Servo medm (H1IMC_SERVO.adl). This change was committed to the svn.
M. Pirello (reported by J. Kissel from verbal discussion with F. Clara) Marc has inspected the Common Mode Board chassis we've removed (SN S1102626), and indeed found several blown transistors and opamps -- and is not even through the chassis test procedure. Unfortunately, the EE shop needs a restocking of surface mount components before we can make the repairs, but the plan is to shoot for a re-install of this board by next Tuesday (Aug 30th).
Repairs to S1102626 are complete and the chassis has been tested with the 200kHz low pass filter. The chassis performance is similar to the previous test performed September 2011.
When the 200kHz low pass filter is activated we detected a 3mV dc offset which should be noted. The low pass filter works as designed with -3dB gain at 200kHz and rolls off nicely. I have attached files from the testing. File details can be found in the readme.txt included in the zip.