Displaying reports 57061-57080 of 85051.Go to page Start 2850 2851 2852 2853 2854 2855 2856 2857 2858 End
Reports until 10:30, Monday 01 August 2016
H1 GRD (SEI)
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:30, Monday 01 August 2016 (28775)
Fixed bug in SEI configuration nodes

The Problem: The SEI configuration nodes have been in error since Friday at 2:58 local due to a bug in the WD decorators, and a bit of oversight by the one who coded that part (me). The regular SEI guardian nodes were tripped and then someone requested the config nodes to change, but these config nodes were not designed to be changed when everything was tripped. The decorator that caused the isse is just copied code and so it tried to jump to a state that didn't exist. Glad this was found before O2.

The Fix: removed all of the decorators that check on WD's, isolation, and damping of the regular nodes. Jim W and I talked and decided that it wasn't really necessary for the config nodes to even have to watch that, so lets lose them. Changing the config states while it is tripped or isolating was thought to maybe be an issue before, but doesnt seem to pose a problem anymore.

H1 SEI (SEI)
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:13, Monday 01 August 2016 (28773)
documenting current HAM6 SEI setup today - hopes for tomorrow
Images attached to this report
LHO General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:51, Monday 01 August 2016 (28769)
Monday Morning 8:30 Meeting Notes

Status:  Discussed smoke from nearby fires.  DetChar F2F starts this morning.  HAM6 vent plan for the week--most likely crack bolts on HAM6 on Tues, BUT we will only start this work when we confirm no dust/smoke issues in the LVEA.

Due to upcoming vent work, we did not go through status of the SEI & ISI.

Bake RGA at end station might start today (Kyle)

HAM6 ISI:  should be isolated or atleast damped (see Hugh)

For Tuesday Maintenance:  Timing work and PI model work were mentioned as primary tasks.  PSL work will cover Mon/Tues per work permit.

For any tours, please remember to fill out a work permit & check with the operator as to whether it is OK (if there is active work in an open chamber we may want to limit tours at that time.)

Visitors This Week:  DetChar people, visitors from China (Fred), KAGRA visitors for PCal (Kiwamu), Krishna/Micahel from UofWA (Hugh)

H1 PEM
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:16, Monday 01 August 2016 - last comment - 14:16, Monday 01 August 2016(28770)
Trends Of LVEA Dust Monitors

Attached are trends of the LVEA Dust Monitors.  

On the 24hr trend, there was a little bit of dust in the LVEA between 8am-1pm, but in the cleanroom, were have been near zero for the last 24 hrs.

On the 4-day trend, the only dust in the HAM6 cleanroom was from technical cleaning on Friday.

Jeff is going to take some more readings outside.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jeffrey.bartlett@LIGO.ORG - 10:21, Monday 01 August 2016 (28774)
   Checked particle counts from outside and inside the OSB and in the LVEA. 

   Summary: Outside air is currently around 330,000 for 0.3um particles. As one moves through the OSB towards the LVEA the counts drop as the building air filtration system does its job. Counts in the LVEA range from 1290 to 270 03.um particles. The attached spreadsheet has the complete readings for all sampled locations. 

   Will continue to monitor as the fire continues to burn.   
 
Non-image files attached to this comment
jeffrey.bartlett@LIGO.ORG - 14:16, Monday 01 August 2016 (28783)
   Second Mid-day check of air around the site shows air quality is not improving. Fires continue to burn or smolder and light wind is not helping clear the air. Posted are the 13:00 hours data. Outside and inside counts are up considerable. Particle counts inside the cleanrooms remain well within acceptable levels for in chamber work.   
Non-image files attached to this comment
LHO General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:22, Monday 01 August 2016 (28767)
Status Of Nearby Fire: No Issue At LIGO & Hanford Site

During the drive in one can certainly see a smoldering Rattlesnake Mountain (did not see much activity [i.e. active fires/personnel] by eye).  From our End-Y building looks like the fire was about 6-7 miles away.

Fred mentioned there were no issues mentioned on the radio with regards to the fire and the Hanford Site.  Ryan pointed me to the hanford.gov advisory site (there is a banner link which you can get the following info about yesterday's nearby fire):

 

Brush Fire Causes Closure to State Route 24  
There are no impacts to Hanford work schedules at this time.

A brush fire that started off the Hanford Site has spread to the Arid Lands Ecology Reserve (ALE) area of the Hanford Site west of State Route 240. As of 6:00 p.m. on Sunday, July 31, 2016, State Route 24 closed from milepost 14 to milepost 39 at the junction of State Route 240. State Route 24 will remain closed and an estimated time to reopen is undetermined. Hanford employees will need to use alternate routes.

We will continue to monitor the situation and update this message if conditions change.

For specific questions regarding company policy contact your manager.

Images attached to this report
H1 General
nutsinee.kijbunchoo@LIGO.ORG - posted 02:40, Monday 01 August 2016 (28766)
Rattlesnake as seen from the site.

Terra, Nutsinee

Images attached to this report
H1 ISC
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - posted 23:20, Sunday 31 July 2016 - last comment - 12:49, Monday 01 August 2016(28765)
LSC-PR_GAIN back at 30 for 50W

Terra, Evan, Stefan

With the spot move script from last alog we could reliably maximize the recycling gain. We reached 30 (as measured by LSC-PR_GAIN - Evan claims this is more like 35).

The instability in AS90 could be removed by manually aligning the SRM - but POP18 got worse when doing so.

Interestingly - the same move that fixes the recycling gain at 50W, has almost no impact on the recycling gain at 2W.

 

For reference, the last lock loss was at about 6:15 UTC on Aug 1st.

We had to adjust the soft loop gains to

            ezca['ASC-DSOFT_P_GAIN'] = 0.5 # 3 killed it
            ezca['ASC-DSOFT_Y_GAIN'] = 3  # oscillates at lower UGF when much lower
            ezca['ASC-CSOFT_P_GAIN'] = 0.5 # designed differently
            ezca['ASC-CSOFT_Y_GAIN'] = 3  # oscillates at lower UGF when much lower
 

Comments related to this report
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - 12:49, Monday 01 August 2016 (28777)

Estimating the spot mosition move required to regain the recycling gain.
====================================================

Conclusion: The corner spot moved by about 8mm in pitch and yaw.

The move direction (to improve the recycling gain) in each arm is a soft translation of the beam axis towards the other arm (yaw), as well as up (pit).
====================================================

 

We used two methods to estimate the spot move on the ITM/BS/PR3.

A) using IM4 angle readback:

Since PR2 doesn't move, looking at how much IM4 moved allows us top simply project the move on PR3. The effecive lever arm (incl. the PRM and PR2 lens effects) is 151.4m.

To regain the best recycling gain we moved IM4 26.2urad in pit and 25.5urad in yaw. This corresponds to (note the factor of 2 for beam steering vs optic angle)

IM4 PIT projection on PR3: 7.9337mm
IM4 YAW projection on PR3: 7.7217mm
 

B) using the test mass oplevs:

The move recorded by the test mass oplevs (in urad) are (EX,EY,IX,IY) are:

PIT:
    1.8700
    1.6500
    2.5000
    2.0600
YAW:
    2.7000
    2.8200
    3.3200
    3.2600

Since it is always hard to get a clean soft that is not masked by residual hard, we project out any spurios hard move.

i) Without removing the hard:
ITM:-1.9858mm, ETM:12.091mm
ITM:0.91049mm, ETM:7.2637mm
ITM:2.4191mm, ETM:10.6978mm
ITM:6.315mm, ETM:6.329mm
 

ii) removing the hard by forcing the ETM and ITM spot move to be the same:

i.e. we force the spot move to be the same on ETM and ITM:
ITM:4.5198mm, ETM:4.5198mm
ITM:3.8466mm, ETM:3.8466mm
ITM:6.2452mm, ETM:6.2452mm
ITM:6.3215mm, ETM:6.3215mm
 

iii) forcing the spot to be zero on the ETM (that's how we think we tuned the SOFT loop sensors):
ITM:8.4743mm, ETM:0mm
ITM:7.1944mm, ETM:0mm
ITM:11.674mm, ETM:0mm
ITM:11.7903mm, ETM:0mm

The reality probably lies between ii) and iii)

 

FInally, note that the control signal recorded in alog 28764 can't be used because of all the radiation pressure torque effects.

 

Attached is a snapshot of the arm oplev motion.

Images attached to this comment
H1 ISC
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - posted 22:23, Sunday 31 July 2016 (28764)
Script for moving the whole interferometer, changing the corner spot position

We reached 50W relatively stable and reliable, and were able to use the POP A offsets to drag the interferometer around.

I recorded that particular alignment vector, and stuck it into a script. This now allows moving the full interferometer in this degree of freedom very rapidly, without taxing the soft loops too much.

We see a clear recycling gain dependence on this degree of freedom. However, one oddity is that when we reach the maximum recycling gain, the AS90 buildup becomes very ratty. I am wondering whether we get close to clipping somewhere with this move, or whether it is related to our SRM alignment dither.

The alignment vector for this move is

# pit
gppr3=0.07
gpprm=-13.2
gpim4=-325
gpsr2=-2.39
gpsrm=3.2
gpex=-0.7
gpey=-0.7
gpix=-0.45
gpiy=-0.35

# yaw
gypr3=0.028
gyprm=11.07
gyim4=61.22
gysr2=2.22
gysrm=2.74
gyex=-0.5
gyey=+0.5
gyix=+0.32
gyiy=-0.31
 

Non-image files attached to this report
H1 ISC
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - posted 19:22, Sunday 31 July 2016 (28763)
Test mass ASC offloading x-over at 0.1Hz

Sheila, Stefan

Based on yesterday's measurement, the ASC PUM to TOP x-over was at 0.002Hz and 0.0029Hz (before the 10dB increase in the script).

I added gains of 50 for pitch and 34.5 (for now in the L1_LOCK modules) to move this x-over to 0.1Hz.

The only loops for which this 0.1Hz offload is critical are the soft loops. Thuis I added z=0.01Hz:p=0.1Hz lead filters to all soft loops. I also turned the soft loop bandwidth up by 3x.

The guardian now sets those gains before turning on the soft loops - and sets them back in the down state.

We still should do some more loop tuning for the soft loops - their response should be sped up

We got to 50W - but lost it when moving the PRM - the soft loops seem to be still too slow to follow, resulting in the Izumi-Ballmer instablility.

H1 GRD (GRD, Lockloss, SEI, SUS)
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:56, Sunday 31 July 2016 - last comment - 19:01, Sunday 31 July 2016(28761)
SUS and ISI trips last night

Stefan, Sheila

We had a lockloss last night during the INCREASE_POWER state when the ISS third loop was coming on.  This is done by a function that had a ten second sleep in a while loop, so the guardian didn't recognize the lockloss for about 90 seconds, in which time ETMY and ITMX suspesnions tripped.  Stage 2 of both ISIs tripped after the suspensions had been tripped for about an hour.  Screenshot shows the sequence of events, first a 90 minute time span then in a 2 minute time span around the lockloss. 

To make sure that in the future the guardian will recognize the guardian more promptly, we moved the ISS third loop engagement to the IMC_LOCK guardian which currently handles the ISS second loop engagement.  The ISC_LOCK guardian just requests this now in the increase power state when it reaches 10 Watts.  

We also looked at why the lock broke.  One potential explanation is that there are large glitches in both DHARD P and Y when the boosts get engaged about 3 seoncds before lockloss (screenshot attached).  These are simple single pole single zero boosts, which were Always on with a 3 second ramp for engaging.  We changed the ramps to 0.2 seconds to see if by ramping faster than any features in the filter we can avoid glitches.  The real cause of the lockloss might have been changes to the offloading that weren't compatible with the guardian as it was last night, but in any case we would like to avoid these large glitches when engaging the boosts.  

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - 19:01, Sunday 31 July 2016 (28762)

There was some problem with the new ISS engaging code - I believe the problem is that we need to stay in MC_LOCKED longer during the power increase to keep the MC gains adjusted.

For now I still call the old function with the sleep. THe new state is still there for debugging.

 

H1 ISC (ISC, VE)
vernon.sandberg@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:43, Sunday 31 July 2016 (28758)
WHAM6 Vent Plan

Betsy Weaver, Keita Kawabe, Vern Sandberg

Jul 28, 2016

E1600229-v1,  WHAM6 Vent Plan

 

APPROVED work to be done in order of importance:

·      Assess HAM6 volume for contamination and investigation of possible beam corruption.  Take photographs.

·      Remove and inspect HAM6 OMC glass breadboard for damage, possibly swap with 3rd breadboard unit and realign

·      Install new High Quantum Efficiency PDs on OMC breadboard

·      Replace VE gauge on top of HAM6

 

DCC Vent Documents referenced in this plan:

·      M1600165 Mobile Cleanroom Relocation Procedure

·      T1600145 Cleanroom Move Checklist

·      E1100742 Payload layout update for HAM6

·      D0901822 HAM6 Top Level Chamber Assembly

·      E1201035 aLIGO Chamber Entry & Exit Procedures

·      M1100039 Hanford Checklist - HAM Door Removal

·      M1300464 Procedure for preparing aLIGO IFO for pumpdown

·      E1500214 OMC Black Glass Assembly Procedure

·      E1300201 OMC Assembly Procedure

·      D0900295 OMC SUS Assembly

·      D1201439 OMC Breadboard Layout

·      D1201515 OMC Transport Fixture

·      T1200525 How To Use the OMC Transport Fixture

·      T080117  Removal of OMC Breadboard

·      E1600013  Handling Procedure for High QE Photodiodes

 

Note – The in-chamber OMC team will consist of Koji, Corey, Jeff B, Betsy, Keita, while the VE and Seismic teams will be performing VE and Seismic line items.

SCHEDULE

FEW DAYS PRIOR TO VENT

1)    Move newly placed L4C’s that are on the LVEA floor, in the way of vent equipment

2)    Turn cleanrooms on around HAM6 where applicable

3)    First and second cleaning of HAM6 chamber area, door flange, and cleanrooms, etc.

4)    Stage supplies and equipment

5)    Contamination control kit

6)    3rd OMC Glass Breadboard unit

7)    2nd OMC transport fixture

8)    Clean spare ISC OM mirrors “just-in-case”

9)    ISC tool pan

10)SUS tool pan

11)Septum viewport cover D1200448

12)Confirm dust monitor is working

13)Lock HEPI

14)Confirm purge air capabilities of HAM6

15)Transition to LASER SAFE

 

TUE AUG 2, 2016

16)Confirm the PSL shutter is closed, then mark and move ISCT6 out of the way to facilitate door removal.  NOTE: DOCUMENT CABLING CONNECTIONS BETWEEN ISCT6 and HAM6.

17)Soft close GV5 and GV7 (backup safety)

18)Turn on purge air, if not done already

19)Vent HAM6

20)Remove NORTH and SOUTH CHAMBER DOORS – Review and follow M1100039 “ Hanford checklist – HAM Door Removal”

21)Entry chamber checklist items: Pick up floor CC wafers, inspect.  Take particle counter measurements and record. (Jeff B)  Notes:

 

22)Lock ISI (Team SEI)

23) Install Septum Window Cover

24) Inspect table components, specifically beam dumps, for damage

25) Start removal of necessary OMC black glass shroud pieces and stow on work table outside of chamber. (Betsy, Koji)

a.     E1500214 OMC Black Glass Assy Procedure

26)Remove ISI table masses that interfere with OMC work.

27) Install new High QE PDs on new OMC Breadboard Assy D1201439-03

a.     E1300201 Section 6.10 Replacement of photodiodes

b.     T1200525 Handling procedure for High QE PDs

28)Put First Contact on new OMC Assy D1201439-03 optical surfaces/PDs for cleaning.

 

WED AUG 3, 2016

 

29) Take daily particle measurements and record:

30)Continue removal of necessary OMC black glass shroud pieces and stow on work table outside of chamber.

a.     E1500214 OMC Black Glass Assy Procedure

31) Remove in-chamber OMC Breadboard Assy D1201439-02.  Place in transport fixture and stow on work table outside of chamber.   Although the removal process itself is not discussed in detail, it’s a reverse process of installation, so follow through the contents of the sections in the following order:

a.     T080117 Section 24 Suspending the masses

b.     T080117 Section 23.2 Attaching lower wires

c.     T080117 Section 21 Installing the metal bench

d.     T1200525 Using the OMC transport fixture

32) Inspect old OMC Breadboard D1201439-02.  If damaged, replace with Breadboard D1201439-03, following sections in this order:

a.     Remove First Contact from new OMC Assy D1201439-03 optical surfaces/PDs

b.     T080117 Section 31 Replacing the metal bench

c.     T080117 Section 21 Installing the metal bench

d.     T080117 Section 23.2 Attaching lower wires

e.     T080117 Section 24 Suspending the masses

 

THUR AUG 4, 2016

 

33) Take daily particle measurements and record:

34)Continue with OMC reinstall work.

35)Balance OMC suspension

a.     E1300201 OMC Assembly Procedure

36)Transition to LASER HAZARD

37)Align OMC with PSL beam

38)Align or confirm alignment of HAM6 optical paths

 

FRI ~TUE AUG 5~9, 2016

 

39) Take daily particle measurements and record:

40)Continue OMC and HAM6 optical alignment

41)Check Beam Diverter functionality

42)Check Tip Tilt TFs

43)Check for cable grounding

44) Rebalance ISI / transfer functions

45) Remove Septum Window Cover

46) Chamber closeout – perform applicable exit checklist tasks E1201035.

47) Take particle count measurements and record:

48)Replace HAM6 Doors

49)  Begin pump down

50)VE swap gauge on top of chamber

51)  Replace ISCT6 and reconnect all cables/light pipes.  Verify shutter functionality.

 

H1 ISC
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:01, Saturday 30 July 2016 - last comment - 09:19, Tuesday 02 August 2016(28757)
ASC PUM to TOP crossing

I started to look into a faster ASC UIM to TOP stage offloading.

The DC gain ratio of the DRIVEALIGN filter outputs is about PUM:TOP = 23:20000 (pitch) and 30:20000 (yaw). There is a slight mismatch between the optics, but that seems to be taken care of with the CAL filter (FM1 in M0_LOCK).

With that gain ratio, and with FM1, FM4 and FM5 on in the MO_LOCK banks, the current x-over between TOP and PUM is about 0.002Hz (pitch) and 0.0029Hz (yaw).

This is very low. I verified that with 10x the gain in all 4 soft loops (gain=0.45 instead of 0.045) and 10x the offloading gain to top, the soop[s still seem stable. I believe the reason we are not running with that during the angaging these loops tax the SRC loops.

 

I added 0Hz:0.1Hz AC couplers into the L2 DRIVEALIGN P2P and Y2Y banks, as well as 0.002Hz:0.1Hz lead filters into Mo DRIVEALIGN P2P  banks ( 0.0029Hz:0.1Hz lead filters for Y2Y). These filters were successfully engaged in full lock. Somewhere however the guardian turns up the offloading gain by 10dB, making these filters unstable... So for now they are not in guardian.

 

Unfortunately, the pwer-up is still failing randomly. Not sure whether that's the 40mph wind, the numerous locked-down hepi's or the increased noise on RF DARM.

 

 

Comments related to this report
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 09:19, Tuesday 02 August 2016 (28805)
There's a typo in Stefan's first sentence: it should say " I started to look into a faster ASC PUM to TOP stage offloading," which makes it consistent with the title and the rest of the entry. (It's dreadfully confusing otherwise!)
LHO VE
kyle.ryan@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:36, Saturday 30 July 2016 (28756)
1600 - 1630 hrs. local -> Checking VBOC and VBOB bakes
Temps look good -> made minor variac adjustments to midstation-destined RGA components that are currently "grafted" onto VBOB (exploiting available clean pump system to bake this sub-assembly and to get a preliminary look at the suspected "dirty" Nitrogen and Krypton calibration gases following bake cycle)
H1 ISC
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - posted 23:52, Friday 29 July 2016 (28755)
Some work

Jenne, Stefan

- Adjusted the PRC1 input matrix form REFL to match the input matrix from POP X at 2Watt. THuardian now has a switch : lscparams.use_popx_wfs (1= use POP X, 0= use REFL WFS). Left it on POP X for now.

- Adjusted the dither input matrix for the SRM to maximize the ratio AS90/POP90. This was done with the gains -0.013 for AS90 and 0.5 for POP 90. (The gain ratio is simply the DC ratio of POP90 and AS90: 17:650.)

- We next tried to establich a stable locking point for the PRM alignment - but unfortunately repeatedly lost in during power-up.

H1 ISC
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - posted 20:44, Friday 29 July 2016 - last comment - 11:56, Sunday 31 July 2016(28754)
IM angles

I've had a nagging in the back of my mind for a little bit now, so I looked at the input steering mirror positions from a good time during O1 as compared to now.  This doesn't account for everything yet, since I haven't looked at the pointing of the IMC, but the current OSEM readbacks of the IMs are significantly different than they were during O1.  I wonder if part of our whole problem has been that we just have different enough input pointing that we're having PRC gain issues.

Anyhow, I'll meditate more and look at IMC pointing, but then maybe I'll try moving the IMs back to these Sept 24-29 positions on Sunday.

As a proxy for PRCgain since we didn't have the handy channel that we do now, I plot the TR_X_NORM.  On the left side of the screenshot are the September values, including the TR_X_NORM at about 1320 counts.  When we are at 50W and our (new) PRC gain channel reads 25, TR_X_NORM is at about 900 counts.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - 11:56, Sunday 31 July 2016 (28759)

The input pointing we have now is definitely not the same as during O1, so I think it's worth trying to go back to that place. 

Images attached to this comment
H1 ISC (CAL, ISC, SUS)
evan.goetz@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:29, Friday 29 July 2016 - last comment - 14:23, Sunday 31 July 2016(28746)
New L2-L3 crossover filters

Evan G., Jeff K., Evan H.

Summary:
We have updated the L2-L3 crossover filters to reduce the effect of the L2 actuation on the superactuator at frequencies above the L2-L3 crossover. In addition we have turned off the vStopB filter in the L2 drivealign bank. The old filters remain in the filter bank, but are turned off in case we need to revert. The SDF has been updated to reflect these changes.

Details:
The old lowpass [ :30], and highpass [0:30] filters were allowing too much interaction of the L2 stage on the frequencies above the crossover. We needed more aggresive rolloff of the L2 stage. A new design was used to develop prototype lowpass and highpass filters that were then normalized to produce complementary filters. The trick was to add some additional filtering in addition to the single pole or single-zero/pole design.

The Matlab zpk prototype lowpass is:

    29.804 (s^2 + 792s + 4.077e06)
  ----------------------------------
  (s+94.25) (s^2 + 1192s + 1.304e06)

and the prototype highpass is:

  0.68377 s (s+0.4816) (s+40.81)
  -------------------------------
  (s+125.7) (s^2 + 35.75s + 1174)

The resulting complementary filters are the lowpass:

      43.587 (s+125.7) (s^2 + 35.75s + 1174) (s^2 + 792s + 4.077e06)
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
  (s^2 + 27.96s + 1124) (s^2 + 256s + 1.986e04) (s^2 + 1087s + 1.175e06)

and the complementary highpass:

        s (s+94.25) (s+40.81) (s+0.4816) (s^2 + 1192s + 1.304e06)
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
  (s^2 + 27.96s + 1124) (s^2 + 256s + 1.986e04) (s^2 + 1087s + 1.175e06)

Putting this into Foton yields the lowpass design:

zpk([63.027+i*315.14;63.027-i*315.14;2.8446+i*4.6522;2.8446-i*4.6522;20], [20.375+i*9.3751;20.375-i*9.3751;2.2252+i*4.8498;2.2252-i*4.8498;86.475+i*149.24; 86.475-i*149.24],1,"n")

and the highpass design (properly normalized to 1 at high frequency):

zpk([94.821+i*155.07;94.821-i*155.07;0;0.076645;6.4948;15], [20.375+i*9.3751;20.375-i*9.3751;2.2252+i*4.8498;2.2252-i*4.8498;86.475+i*149.24; 86.475-i*149.24],1,"n")gain(0.000578996)

These are installed in the L2 and L3 drivealign banks as L2L3LP and L2L3HP, respectively.

We have compared the old and new design and the effect on the DARM actuation and DARM open loop gain and closed loop suppression, and we are satisfied with the improved filter design. Attached is a series of figures to illustrate the new design (see the plots.pdf file)

Figure 1: actuation plant transfer function (left plots) and the PUM/TST ratio (right plots)
Figure 2: current state of the distribution filters (before any modification)
Figure 3: current state of the actuation authority (before any modification) -- note the black curve has ripples in the 100-900 Hz band
Figure 4: new crossover filter design -- prototype and final design
Figure 5: new distribution filter design from Matlab continuous filters -- note that we turn off the vStopB filter module in the L2 drivealign bank
Figure 6: new actuation authority from the Matlab filters -- note the improvement in the black curve with much less ripple than before
Figure 7: using new design, L2 and L3 actuation transfer functions: drive at input to L3 lock bank and look at L3 response for both L2 and L3 paths and taking the sum
Figure 8: using new design, the ratio of the two single curves in figure 7 -- note the transfer function is unity at 23.3 Hz and with a phase margin of 67 degrees
Figure 9: new distribution filter design as implemented in Foton -- note that these are the same as the Matlab design
Figure 10: new actuation authority from the Foton filters -- again, same as before
Figure 11: compare the DARM open loop gain and closed loop suppression from the current state (old) and using the new filter design and also when there is no SRC detuning -- note there was a lingering 400 Hz notch filter in the ER9 run that shouldn't have been there (Evan H to make sure this is off) and this model takes into account the increase of the digital DARM gain to 1400. The blue curves have little ripple above 100 Hz, and the phase margin is actually a little larger than before, about 48 degrees. The gain peaking is roughly the same as before ~4 dB.
Figure 12: A final acutation authority plot showing the new total is much improved over the old total, especially in the range of 100-900 Hz (see zoom on right hand plots).

For the record, also attached are screen shots of the L2/L3 drivealign filter banks before and after the changes as well as a screenshot of the SDF.

Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - 14:23, Sunday 31 July 2016 (28760)

I adjusted FM1 in DARM1 (2 Hz / 8 Hz boost) so that we no longer have gain loss around 10 Hz. Since we already lose gain from the antispring, this boost was not helping us in terms of loop stability.

We lose about 12 dB of gain at 2 Hz with this change.

Images attached to this comment
H1 General
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:11, Friday 29 July 2016 - last comment - 09:24, Monday 01 August 2016(28744)
Ops Day Summary:

State of H1: earthquake, unlocked, ISC_LOCK set to Down, IMC_LOCK set to Offline

Activities:

Since EQ:

Comments related to this report
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - 16:18, Friday 29 July 2016 (28745)

SEI_CONF guardian is set to EARTH_QUAKE

Hugh and I opened the Blends MEDM and changed the SEI_CONF.

Should be returned to WINDY_NO_BRSY when locking resumes.

MEDM attached

Images attached to this comment
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - 09:24, Monday 01 August 2016 (28771)

Be very careful here! Even though the SEI_CONF says that it is in the correct state, it also has 10 notifications saying that 10 of its suborrdinate nodes are in ERROR. So it actually never got to its EARTHQUAKE state fully. If Guardian nodes are ever in error, someone who knows how,  needs to fix them. In this particular case it is a bug that I will post an alog about soon.

H1 ISC
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:38, Friday 29 July 2016 - last comment - 08:07, Wednesday 17 August 2016(28737)
OMC alignment turned off

The OMC alignment servos keep turning on, even though the OMC guardian is paused.  I found that it gets turned on in engage_wfs_centering whenever we do any ASC since it's in a generate states function.  So, I have commented out that line, but we must uncomment it when we have the OMC back and are ready to use it again.  It is currently line 113 in ISC_GEN_STATES.

Comments related to this report
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - 08:47, Monday 01 August 2016 (28768)

Maybe this should have a work permit to make sure this isn't forgotten; or at least some mechanism to undo the change in a timely manner.

corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 08:07, Wednesday 17 August 2016 (29145)

Not sure when it happened, but looks like this has been restored to normal & uncommented (probably some time after the HAM6 work last week).

Making a note in Operator Sticky Notes wiki.

Displaying reports 57061-57080 of 85051.Go to page Start 2850 2851 2852 2853 2854 2855 2856 2857 2858 End