Displaying reports 57821-57840 of 85659.Go to page Start 2888 2889 2890 2891 2892 2893 2894 2895 2896 End
Reports until 11:33, Monday 25 July 2016
H1 TCS
nutsinee.kijbunchoo@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:33, Monday 25 July 2016 (28620)
HWS code stopped running - now resumed

HWS code stopped during the weekend because the disk ran out of space. I deleted some of the old data and the scripts are running again. I'm working on a script that will delete old data automatically.

H1 General
edmond.merilh@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:32, Monday 25 July 2016 (28617)
Morning Meeting Minutes

Status / Work Permit review

SEI - nothing to report. Tues plans to examine the IMTY coild driver

SUS - No report

CDS - (for Tues)ITMY SEI coil driver investigation/ITM cameras. May restart baffle PD boxes

PSL - ongoing chiller flow sensor errors causing laser trips. 

VAC - BSC Ion pump repcaement scheduled for Tues

FAC - Divers on site to inspect fire water tank.

Software - revisions to be made to GDS programs. Additional framewriter to be added to collect data from concentrator.

A TV crew froim Hong Kong will be on site tomorrow

H1 AOS
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:27, Monday 25 July 2016 (28615)
ITM oplevs need more whitening gain, ITMY oplev needs more whitening filters, we could also give ETMX one more whitening filter.

According to T1500556, current settings for test mass oplevs are:

  Whitening gain Number of active whitening filters oplev SUM counts
ETMX 18dB 1 40500
ETMY 0dB 2 28000
ITMX 0dB 2 2400
ITMY 0dB 0 5400

ITMY oplev PIT noise is close to the DAQ noise floor at about 3Hz, and the DAQ noise dominates the RMS down to 0.7Hz or so. ITMX is OK for RMS due to double 1:10 whitening, but not much better at 3Hz. Not good for oplev damping.

Also it seems totally fine to use two stages of whitening filters for ETMX.

We can set things up like this (changes in bold font):

  Whitening gain Number of active whitening filters 4000*10^(24/20)oplev SUM counts
ETMX 18dB 2 40500
ETMY 0dB 2 28000
ITMX 21dB 2 27000
ITMY 15dB 2 30000
Images attached to this report
H1 PSL (PSL)
peter.king@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:12, Monday 25 July 2016 (28616)
High Power Oscillator Monitoring Photodiodes
The filter gains for the high power oscillator monitoring diodes were switched back from 1 to their
old values that were recorded under
20599




Jason/Peter
H1 CDS
james.batch@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:31, Monday 25 July 2016 (28613)
Reboot h1digivideo1, power cycled h1cam18
The IOC for h1cam18 was not running properly, an old image was being displayed and centroid values were frozen.  Tried restarting the IOC, it didn't clear the problem.  Tried rebooting h1digivideo1, it came back OK, but the IOC for h1cam18 wouldn't run.  Tried deleting all of camera 18's log files and restarting, still wouldn't run.  Logged on to network switch to power cycle the h1cam18, then restarted the IOC and it appears to be behaving OK now.
H1 PSL
edmond.merilh@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:29, Monday 25 July 2016 (28614)
PSL Weekly Trends - FAMIS# 6106

Multiple LASER trips are evident in the trends. Also, apparently, H1:PSL-OSC_DB3_CUR is reporting 100A. This is inconsistent and virtually impossible. Something wrong with the channel. FRS# 5955 filed.

Images attached to this report
H1 PSL (PSL)
peter.king@LIGO.ORG - posted 05:55, Monday 25 July 2016 (28612)
laser tripped
Came in to find that the laser had tripped.  Error messages were as before.  Found that although I could
reset the laser I could not turn it on without rebooting the Beckhoff computer.  All the TwinCAT channels
were live and so on.  When the command was issued to turn on the pump diodes, the pump diode current(s)
did not increase.

    The crystal chiller displays "Error Flow - sensor 1", as before, even though the laser is up and
running.

    One other observation is that the mouse on the Beckhoff computer appears to be dead.  Whilst its LED
is on, moving the mouse does not move the cursor.  Not sure that the two problems are related but it
certainly doesn't help.
H1 ISC (ISC)
carl.blair@LIGO.ORG - posted 02:01, Monday 25 July 2016 - last comment - 15:44, Friday 19 August 2016(28611)
PI dark region

I have been taking spectra from the SR785 (WP6005) whenever I get a chance over the last week to see if there is any evidence of three mode interactions in the 60kHz to 70kHz region that we will not be sensitive to with the aliased OMC DCPD HF channels that we normally analyze.
There is a consistent peak at 62935Hz, this peak is present with no optical power in the arm cavities.
There are several other more transient peaks, one of the times several had large amplitudes is shown in the first figure.
The largest peak is at 63776Hz  The maximum amplitude seen was 5E-6  This is about the same as the 18040Hz mode when it is 2 orders of magnitude above thermal noise and 2 orders of magnitude under unlocking the cavity.
The second largest is at 70160Hz and the third largest at 62336.

There is no evidence of peaks in DARM at this time at the expected aliased frequencies 1760Hz,  3200Hz or 4624Hz and the peaks that appear in the HF channels that do not appear in the normal DCPD channels do not coincide in frequency, see the second image.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
terra.hardwick@LIGO.ORG - 21:50, Monday 25 July 2016 (28631)

We disconnected this SR785 around 11am local time today. This closed work permit #6005.

jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 15:44, Friday 19 August 2016 (29204)
J. Kissel, T. Hardwick

We've taken the liberty of rifling through Carl's home directory in hopes to find the raw data from this entry to re-plot for clarity. We found it!

The newly attached plot now highlights the PI modes that Carl mentions in his aLOG, and also shows the anticipated ADC noise. Thus, any modes below 6.3e-6 [V/rtHz] should not be resolved by the ADC, and therefore will show up aliased into digitized signals in the detection band. 

Terra notes that the mode Carl mentions at 70160 Hz is the largest of several peaks at 69.84, 69.95, and 70.03 kHz (not highlighted), which is likely a mode cluster.

Other details:
The raw data lives here (determined by Terra knowing that Carl keep his GPIB data in his home folder, then lining up the data on the figure with the filename): 
/ligo/home/carl.blair/gpib/netgpibdata/dataSPSR785_24-07-2016_212424.txt

This data (as described in the referenced work permit 6005), is the raw analog output of the TMSY's red QPD's whitening chassis.

This data also happens to cover the frequency region surrounding the 65536 [Hz] native sampling frequency of the General Standards ADC, and the corresponding notch in all Anit-Aliasing (AA) chassis. One can see, delightfully, that there is very little noise or lines in this frequency band on this channel that might also otherwise be aliased down to low frequency. 

We should perform a similar spectral analysis of the OMC DCPD whitening chassis output voltage to check if their AA chassis is also sufficiently notched so as to not contribute noise in to the DARM sensitivity.
Images attached to this comment
Non-image files attached to this comment
H1 ISC (ISC)
carl.blair@LIGO.ORG - posted 23:29, Sunday 24 July 2016 - last comment - 04:42, Tuesday 26 July 2016(28609)
Phase locked loop tracking PI modes

[Matt, Carl]

The phase lock loop is now installed as an optional tool in the PI armory. I have used the settings and method Matt demonstrated to me on the test stand to lock onto OMC PI signals in the last 50W lock. I tried locking onto QPD signals but was unable to at quiescent amplitudes. The phase locked loop in the locked state is shown in the first image. It is tracking a 15521Hz ITMX mode (sorry for the poor labeling in the figure, there's still a few bugs in medm screens).

The settings used were:
Filter I - 100Hz LP Gain 1
Filter Q - 100Hz LP Gain 1
Freq Filter 1 - gain 1
Freq Filter 2 – gain 0.02, 20mHz integrator + low pass see below
FC Count - 10mHz low pass (this was not low enough as the frequency estimate was still fluctuating by 20Hz
Ampl Filt er - 1Hz low pass gain 1
Lock Filter - 1Hz low pass gain 1

Lock was acquired by setting a set frequency close to the mode frequency observed in a spectrum of the OMC HF channels. The loop was engaged with a 100Hz low-pass in Freq Filter 2 then put in a narrow band mode by engaging a 1Hz low-pass in Freq Filter 2, the loop lost lock when I tried to further reduce its bandwidth by either reducing the gain of decreasing the frequency of the low-pass. The figure is in the high bandwidth mode.  The PLL and iwave can be accessed from the mode block for any mode and a matrix is used to select a control signal, see the second image.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
matthew.evans@LIGO.ORG - 01:12, Monday 25 July 2016 (28610)

I think the best way to transition from PLL "aquisition mode" (high-gain and wide-band) is:

  1. start with gain of 1 in FREQ_FILT1 and 2 (FF1 and FF2), no filtering in FF1, and LP10 in FF1
  2. lower the gain in FF1 to ~0.02
  3. engage a low-pass filter in FF1 (e.g., LP0.1)

This should keep the output of FF2 (which contains an integrator) fairly constant, and thus keep the PLL locked during the transition.

matthew.evans@LIGO.ORG - 04:42, Tuesday 26 July 2016 (28634)

Well, step 1 was supposed to read:

start with gain of 1 in FREQ_FILT1 and FREQ_FILT2 (FF1 and FF2), no filtering in FF1, and Int20mHz + LP10 in FF2

H1 ISC (ISC)
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:42, Sunday 24 July 2016 (28608)
ISS 3rd loop measured at 50W

We had a lockloss at 50W due to what looked like the ISS 3rd loop, so I re-measured with higher recycling gain.  It seems that when we recover recycling gain by moving the PRM, we get some loop interactions that reduce the gain of the 3rd loop right where we need it.  So far, just increasing the gain of the loop has been enough to keep things under control.

Attached is a set of measurements of the 3rd loop, with the state of the IFO noted in the magnitude legend on the upper left.  "g" refers to the gain H1:PSL-ISS_TR_GAIN. 

Once, while the 3rd loop gain was -1.5, it started to oscillate.  I put the gain to -2, then down to -1.  I think it liked -1 better at that time, and that's how I left it for the rest of that lock, but -2 could also have been okay perhaps.  I'm not totally sure.  Perhaps we need to give this thing a UGF servo?

Images attached to this report
LHO VE
kyle.ryan@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:42, Sunday 24 July 2016 - last comment - 16:27, Sunday 24 July 2016(28604)
1430 hrs. local -> Kyle woking in Vac Prep lab
Will make log entry when leaving.  

Also, BSC8 annulus ion pump railed again, same as back in May.  See also, https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=27325 and https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=27385 

Will likely replace pump during Tuesday Maintenance period
Comments related to this report
kyle.ryan@LIGO.ORG - 16:27, Sunday 24 July 2016 (28607)
Started pumps in room 169 @ 1615 hrs. local -> will be running until further notice 

1700 hrs. local -> Leaving site now
H1 ISC (ISC)
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:08, Sunday 24 July 2016 - last comment - 15:41, Sunday 24 July 2016(28603)
Locked at 50W on ETMY

[Jenne, Carl, Terra]

To facilitate the damping of the 18kHz ETMX mode, we are currently locked at 50W using ETMY so that ETMX can be swapped to its low noise driver. SRM dither loop is open.

To do this, it's okay to (once IncreasePower is finished) go to Manual mode and select LowNoise_ESD_ETMY. Last week we lost lock trying to do this because this state also (used to) switch the L2 coil drivers to their low noise state, which we aren't ready for.  So, the noise is acceptable for the lownoise ESDs, but not the low noise L2 drivers.  On the to-do list is to decide where in the sequence to put the L2 switching.

PI and other work is ongoing.

Comments related to this report
peter.fritschel@LIGO.ORG - 15:05, Sunday 24 July 2016 (28605)

For the L2 coil drivers, if I understand correctly you are set up to transition to the lowest noise (and lowest range) state, state 3. As an alternative you might transition to state 1, where the ACQ mode is switched OFF, but the low-pass remains OFF. I believe the low-pass is a 1 Hz pole, 10 Hz zero, so this would afford more range above 10 Hz than state 3, and still puts the L2 noise low enough that it's not a significant limit, at least for our O2 goal. See Chris W's entry 28264.

jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - 15:41, Sunday 24 July 2016 (28606)

Ah, yes.  I think you had mentioned this, but I forgot.  I'll give that a try.

H1 AOS
terra.hardwick@LIGO.ORG - posted 20:58, Saturday 23 July 2016 - last comment - 21:25, Saturday 23 July 2016(28600)
PI at 50, 60 W today

Kiwamu, Carl, Terra

18041 Hz (ETMY) successfully damped through several locks. 15542 Hz (ETMX) unstable after about 1 hour at 50 W but we cannot damp without going to LOWNOISE_ESD_ETMY.

We had a few ~1 hour locks at 50 W today, with a bit of time at 60 W. 

18041: damped first with +30 phase, +30K gain but rang up in the second lock despite. Changing to zero phase damped it in the second lock and prevented any ring up during the third lock.

15542: rings up almost immediately at 60 W. Rings up after an hourish at 50 W. This mode belongs to ETMX but we've been sitting at INCREASE_POWER during locks so we cannot use the LNLV ETMX driver to damp. 

Comments related to this report
chris.whittle@LIGO.ORG - 21:01, Saturday 23 July 2016 (28601)
Because ETMX PI couldn't be damped, I tested my ITM DARM charge measurement script, which broke lock. I know the cause and will be able to fix it for another attempt tomorrow.
carl.blair@LIGO.ORG - 21:25, Saturday 23 July 2016 (28602)

The SUS_PI guardian is running again.  It had got stuck with spm differences after the model restarts.  
During these lock stretches settings for damping several modes were found and put in the gaurdian.  
15522Hz ITMX (mode2) was ringing up at the end of the last lock aand was damped with gain -300 and phase -60 deg.
15541Hz ETMY (mode25) was stable but the driven up to find a damping gain 1000 and phase +60deg and the 
18041Hz ETMY phase has been adjusted to 0 deg (gain stays 1000)


 

H1 DetChar
keith.riles@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:20, Tuesday 12 July 2016 - last comment - 08:01, Thursday 01 September 2016(28364)
Narrow lines in ER9 H1 DARM
Executive summary: 

* Good news - as expected, the 16-Hz comb due to the OMC length dither is gone (at least at this sensitivity level)
* Bad news - low-frequency 1-Hz combs remain, and some new low-frequency combs & lines have appeared 

Some details:
  • I initially looked at 15 hours of 30-minute FScan DELTAL_EXTERNAL SFTs (30 SFTs) generated during ER9 and was aghast at how bad the low-frequency spectrum looked, with a pervasive 0.485308-Hz comb ranging up to its 446th harmonic at 216.4 Hz, but when I exclude the three hours of SFTs when the 2-second ALS- glitches were present, things don't look quite so bad (see figure 1 for a sample without removal and figure 4 with removal). I dewhiten according to the new 6-pole / 6-zero, 0.3 / 30 Hz algorithm.
  • The infamous 16-Hz comb due to the OMC length dither tracked down and killed here is gone (at least at this sensitivity level and these SFT statistics). As a result the high-frequency band (up to 2 kHz) is remarkably smooth with only violin modes and sporadic isolated artifacts.
  • The 1-Hz comb with 0.5-Hz offset remains pervasive, but other prior 1-Hz or near-1-Hz combs with different offsets (e.g., 0.25 Hz) are not strong.
  • On the other hand, there is a new near-1-Hz comb (0.996798-Hz spacing) visible to its 204th harmonic at ~203.3 Hz.
  • There is also a new near-2-Hz comb (1.999951-Hz spacing) visible on approximate odd-integer-Hz frequencies, starting from ~9 Hz and visible up to ~175 Hz. This is likely the same 2-Hz comb reported in May by Bryn Pearlstone (which Ansel Neunzert kindly reminded me about today).
  • There is a "new" 56.8406-Hz comb visible to its 11th harmonic at ~625.25 Hz, which in hindsight I can see was buried in the O1 spectrum (I overlooked the pattern and indicated the teeth as isolated lines). This time the pattern was strong enough to jump out at me and to jog my memory that this comb was seen in H2 1-arm data in 2012 in both the arm feedback channel and a quiet sensor-noise-dominated OSEM channel. This seemed to indicate a DAQ system problem at the time. I can see from O1 NoEMi line lists that this comb is pervasive in ISI, SUS and PEM channels at the corner station and both end stations.
  • The old "K" comb-on-comb (0.088425-Hz fine comb attached to teeth of a coarse 76.3235-Hz comb) has more 11 more fine teeth visible on the lowest-frequency coarse-tooth comb.
  • The old calibration line at 35.9 Hz has been moved to 35.3 Hz. The new excitation lines at 33.7 and 34.7 Hz are easily visible, but not as strong as the primary calibration lines. I found these changes documented here.
  • There are sporadic new isolated lines here and there (indicated in line list - see below)
  • There is a "crab-killer" broad bump centered at about 58.6 Hz which degrades sensitivity in the Crab Pulsar band of interest (~59.3 Hz). On the other hand, the whole noise floor is elevated w.r.t. O1, anyway. So it may be premature to worry about the bump.
Figure 1 - spectrum for 50-100 Hz when the 3-hour 2-second-glitches stretch is included (~0.5 Hz lines marked with 'h' for 'half') Figure 2 - 0-2000 Hz (removing 3-hour bad stretch from here on) Figure 3 - 20-50 Hz sub-band Figure 4 - 50-100 Hz sub-band Figure 5 - 100-200 Hz sub-band Figure 6 - 1300-1400 Hz sub-band (illustration of how clean the high-frequency band is) Also attached are a larger set of zipped sub-band spectra and a lines list (excluding the bad 3-hour stretch). Note that because the statistics here are two orders of magnitude smaller than used for the full O1 run report, I am not yet removing lines seen then that may yet re-emerge with more accumulated post-O1 data. So many of the line labels in these figures are buried in the noise fuzz for now. Line label codes in figures: b - Bounce mode (quad suspension) r - Roll mode (quad suspension) Q - Quad violin mode and harmonics B - Beam splitter violin mode and harmonics C - Calibration lines M - Power mains (60 HZ) O - 1-Hz comb (0.5-Hz offset) o - weaker 1-Hz and near-1-Hz combs (various offsets, including zero) H - 99.9989-Hz comb J - 31.4127 and 31.4149-Hz combs K - 0.088425-Hz comb-on-comb t - 1.999951-Hz, 2.07412-Hz and 2.07423-Hz combs D - 56.8406-Hz comb x - single line (not all singlets in the vicinity of quad violin modes are marked, given the known upconversion)
Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
duo.tao@LIGO.ORG - 12:04, Monday 25 July 2016 (28619)DetChar

I analyzed the 56.8406Hz comb with coherence tool and here are the results. The same structure is found to be significant in 35 channels in ER9, distributed in ISI, SUS, PEM and LSC subsystems. Among all the 35 channels, 22 of them does not have a range up to its 11th harmonic, 625.25 Hz.

 

Keith indicated in his slog entry that a DAQ malfunction is suspected to be the ultimate source of this, and these findings suggest it's in an EX electronics crate.

 

Here are a few interesting observations:

  • The 9th harmonic at 511.56Hz is the weakest in most channels, sometimes buried in noises.

  • In some PEM channels, there are missing lines at low frequency (< 200 Hz) and high frequency (> 500 Hz).

  • In PEM and ISI channels, there seems to be another comb structure with a frequency slightly larger than 56.8406Hz coexists. That one is usually most significant at its third harmonics.

  • Generally, the structure is more clearly seen in LSC, SUS and ISI channels

 

Sample plots from each subsystem:

Figure 1: We can see the 56.8406Hz comb structure exists with its 9th harmonic weakest in ISI.

Figure 2: PEM channels have more noises and, as in ISI channels, the other comb structure coexists.

Figure 3: SUS channels do not have enough range up its 11th harmonic but we can see its first and second harmonic here.

Figure 4: There is only one channel from LSC but the structure is very clear.

 

All plots and a list of channels are attached in the zip file.

Images attached to this comment
Non-image files attached to this comment
nelson.christensen@LIGO.ORG - 11:14, Tuesday 26 July 2016 (28642)DetChar, PEM
Just to be clear. Here are the channels that the coherence tool is finding the comb. This is what is supporting Keith's assumption that the problems could be in an EX electronics crate.

Channels List:
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_RX_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ_data
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_RY_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ_data
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_RZ_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ_data
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_X_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ_data
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_Y_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ_data
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_Z_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ_data
H1:LSC-X_TR_A_LF_OUT_DQ_data
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_BSC9_ETMX_Y_DQ_data
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_BSC9_ETMX_Z_DQ_data
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_ISCTEX_TRANS_X_DQ_data
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_VEA_FLOOR_Z_DQ_data
H1:PEM-EX_MIC_VEA_MINUSX_DQ_data
H1:PEM-EX_MIC_VEA_PLUSX_DQ_data

H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_Y_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ_data
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_Z_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ_data
H1:ISI-GND_STS_ETMX_X_DQ_data
H1:ISI-GND_STS_ETMX_Y_DQ_data
H1:PEM-EX_MAINSMON_EBAY_1_DQ_data
H1:PEM-EX_MAINSMON_EBAY_2_DQ_data
H1:PEM-EX_MAINSMON_EBAY_3_DQ_data
H1:PEM-EX_SEIS_VEA_FLOOR_X_DQ_data
H1:PEM-EX_SEIS_VEA_FLOOR_Y_DQ_data
H1:SUS-ETMX_L1_WIT_Y_DQ_data
H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_WIT_L_DQ_data
H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_WIT_P_DQ_data
H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_WIT_Y_DQ_data
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_L_IN1_DQ_data
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_P_IN1_DQ_data
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_T_IN1_DQ_data
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_V_IN1_DQ_data
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_Y_IN1_DQ_data
duo.tao@LIGO.ORG - 18:55, Thursday 28 July 2016 (28717)DetChar

I chased Comb 23 (type K) in Keith’s post, shown in Keith's original post as

https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/uploads/28364_20160712211751_CombPlots_H1-CAL-DELTAL-EXT_ER9-Cleaned_100_200_Hz.png

 

This comb has an offset of 153.3545 Hz and a fundamental frequency of 0.0884Hz. It starts at 153.3545 Hz and goes up to its 11th harmonic, 154.3272 Hz. As is listed in Keith's txt file:

Comb 23 (type K, offset=153.354500):
Frequency (offset + harmonic x fund freq) Ampl (m/rtHz)  Bar (logarithmic)
K  153.3545 (   0  X    0.0884) 1.844961e-19   ****
K  153.4429 (   1  X    0.0884) 1.949756e-19   ****
K  153.5314 (   2  X    0.0884) 2.165192e-19   *****
K  153.6198 (   3  X    0.0884) 2.181833e-19   *****
K  153.7082 (   4  X    0.0884) 2.457840e-19   *****
K  153.7966 (   5  X    0.0884) 2.243089e-19   *****
K  153.8851 (   6  X    0.0884) 2.709562e-19   *****
K  153.9735 (   7  X    0.0884) 2.499596e-19   *****
K  154.0619 (   8  X    0.0884) 2.562208e-19   *****
K  154.1503 (   9  X    0.0884) 1.945817e-19   ****
K  154.2388 (  10  X    0.0884) 1.951777e-19   ****
K  154.3272 (  11  X    0.0884) 1.703353e-19   ****

 

I found the comb structure in two channels of ISI subsystem.

Figure 1 shows the plot of channel H1:ISI-HAM6_BLND_GS13RZ_IN1_DQ. Descriptions of this channel can be found here:

https://cis.ligo.org/channel/314371

Figure 2 shows the plot of channel H1:ISI-HAM6_BLND_GS13Z_IN1_DQ. Descriptions of this channel can be found here:

https://cis.ligo.org/channel/314374

In the plots of both channels, we can see a comb structure stands out at the positions of harmonics. We are wondering about the reason for this:

 

Why these seismic isolation channels?


Images attached to this comment
duo.tao@LIGO.ORG - 00:15, Friday 29 July 2016 (28721)

This post is supplementary to the first post about coherence analysis result for the 56.8406Hz Comb at

https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=28619

The first post is addressing the 56.8406Hz comb found in Keith's original post (marked as D comb):

https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=28364

Information about this comb from the txt file in Keith's post:

Comb 35 (type D, offset=0.000000):
  Frequency (offset + harmonic x fund freq) Ampl (m/rtHz)  Bar (logarithmic)
D   56.8406 (   1  X   56.8406) 3.968800e-17   ***********
D  113.6811 (   2  X   56.8406) 1.773964e-17   **********
D  170.5217 (   3  X   56.8406) 7.121580e-18   *********
D  227.3622 (   4  X   56.8406) 3.232935e-18   ********
D  284.2028 (   5  X   56.8406) 1.166094e-18   *******
D  341.0433 (   6  X   56.8406) 1.007273e-18   *******
D  397.8839 (   7  X   56.8406) 5.962059e-19   ******
D  454.7245 (   8  X   56.8406) 3.752194e-19   *****
D  511.5650 (   9  X   56.8406) 2.577108e-19   *****
D  568.4056 (  10  X   56.8406) 1.964393e-19   ****
D  625.2461 (  11  X   56.8406) 1.891774e-19   ****
--------------------------------------------------------------

Besides the 35 channels found in the original post, 7 more channels are found to be relevant to the 56.8406Hz Comb. Two new subsystems, ASC and HPI are involved.

These new channels are:

H1:ASC-X_TR_A_NSUM_OUT_DQ

H1:ASC-X_TR_B_NSUM_OUT_DQ

H1:HPI-ETMX_BLND_L4C_Y_IN1_DQ

H1:HPI-ETMX_BLND_L4C_Z_IN1_DQ

H1:PEM-EX_ACC_BSC9_ETMX_X_DQ

H1:SUS-ETMX_L1_WIT_L_DQ

H1:SUS-ETMX_L1_WIT_P_DQ

So updated channel list is (42 channels in total):

H1:ASC-X_TR_A_NSUM_OUT_DQ
H1:ASC-X_TR_B_NSUM_OUT_DQ
H1:HPI-ETMX_BLND_L4C_Y_IN1_DQ
H1:HPI-ETMX_BLND_L4C_Z_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_RX_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_RY_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_RZ_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_X_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_Y_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_Z_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_RX_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_RY_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_RZ_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_X_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_Y_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_Z_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-GND_STS_ETMX_X_DQ
H1:ISI-GND_STS_ETMX_Y_DQ
H1:LSC-X_TR_A_LF_OUT_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_BSC9_ETMX_X_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_BSC9_ETMX_Y_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_BSC9_ETMX_Z_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_ISCTEX_TRANS_X_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_VEA_FLOOR_Z_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_MAINSMON_EBAY_1_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_MAINSMON_EBAY_2_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_MAINSMON_EBAY_3_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_MIC_VEA_MINUSX_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_MIC_VEA_PLUSX_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_SEIS_VEA_FLOOR_X_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_SEIS_VEA_FLOOR_Y_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L1_WIT_L_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L1_WIT_P_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L1_WIT_Y_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_WIT_L_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_WIT_P_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_WIT_Y_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_L_IN1_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_P_IN1_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_T_IN1_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_V_IN1_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_Y_IN1_DQ
 

Attached images are sample plots from ASC and HPI subsystem.

Full results are also attached.

Images attached to this comment
Non-image files attached to this comment
duo.tao@LIGO.ORG - 08:01, Thursday 01 September 2016 (29431)

Coherence Search Results of All the Single Lines in ER9 Data

Here are the coherence search results of all the single lines in ER9 data, which are listed in Keith’s post. I found 29 of all the 198 lines on the list and posted the results on my homepage here:

https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~duo.tao/ER9_single_lines/index.html

Displaying reports 57821-57840 of 85659.Go to page Start 2888 2889 2890 2891 2892 2893 2894 2895 2896 End