(All times are local Pacific Standard Time)
Summary:
PSL crew worked in the PSL room in the morning and then H1 was available for locking and commissioning.
SEI Notes:
H1 Locking Notes:
Day's Activities
rpn3.png shows 3 relative power noise spectra taken today with the power stabilisation
locked with the gain slider at 6 dB - with and without the integrator - and at 9 dB,
after yesterday's alignment tweak into the pre-modecleaner and re-aligning of the
photodiode box.
As can be seen the integrator has little if any effect.
Jason, Peter
By popular demand, I have added a FE_STATUS legend to the CDS overview medm screen. This is slightly different from the STATE_WORD bits shown on the GDS_TP screens, so a legend is indeed useful. The first 9 bits match, I have dropped the OVERFLOW bit, shifted the CFC bit one left and added the DAQ (as seen from the DAQ) bit to the end.
The legend is a related display, please use the "SHOW LEGEND" button at the bottom of the overview screen.
Corey again had trouble with the XARM IR not locking today, and Jenne found that the optical gain seems to be 10dB higher today than it was on May10th 27082. We compared the power on ASAIR LF which had a change in power which was small compared to the dark offset, and the position on AS_C, which had moved in pit from -0.9 to 0. However, Jenne moved SR2 around to mimic these changes, and saw no change in the loop gain. So it seems like we have a 10dB gain change that we don't understand.
As a way of getting around this, I edited the filters in XARM IR to make our phase bubble a little bit wider, moving both kHz poles to 2kHz and moving a zero from 30Hz to 10 Hz. A comparison of the filters and the OLG is in the attached screenshot. We have lowered the digital gain in the guardian to 0.05 again.
I have written a simple script called which_models_are_using_this_file
It takes one argument, the name of the file either as a full path or name only, and reports all models which use that file. This will allow a source file change to be propagated to all models which use it and prevent possible surprises the next time a model is built (e.g. during an RCG upgrade).
> which_models_are_using_this_file /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/cds/common/src/LOW_FREQ_MUX.c
Models which use file: /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/cds/common/src/LOW_FREQ_MUX.c
h1omc
h1pemex
h1pemey
The FMCS screens which appear on the MEDM web view have been modified to include a date and time string. This should provide offsite viewers some assurance the data presented is current. A side effect of this is the screens as viewed from the vacuum controls workstations will have a white block where the date and time string is, similar to what is shown on the vacuum screens on those workstations.
Josh, user EcceruElme from GravitySpy beta, Andy User EcceruElme in the GravitySpy beta (a citizen science effort to classify detector artifacts) identified a new glitch class. They pointed out here that the glitches are not quite periodic, but the shapes seem to alternate - first upwards, then downwards. See the first plot. One time when this happens is Dec 12 at 21:31 UTC. Looking at more time, we realized that these are nearly periodic when you treat them as coming in pairs - first an upward glitch, then downward. The pair have a spacing of about 2.5 sec (or 0.4 Hz). The glitches go on for minutes, and then the lock ends. Comparing to a time earlier in the lock, several mirrors develop a big peak in pitch (and to a lesser extent length) motion around 0.4 Hz, as witnessed by the OSEMs. We see this motion in the beamsplitter, SRM and SR2 but not SR3, and in the OMC tip-tilts and the OMC suspension. The BS has a pendulum mode in length at 0.4193 Hz and in pitch at 0.4683 Hz. So it seems most likely that this resonance got rung up somehow, and then SRM and SR2 are following this to try to keep the beam pointed toward the tip-tilts (SR3 is uncontrolled and has no movement). Then the three tip-tilts and the OMC are following that motion - there are two degrees of freedom to center the beams on the WFS, and two more to keep it pointed into the OMC, which is why all three tip-tilts as well as the OMC suspension itself all move. The second through fourth plots are the motions of the BS, SRs, and tip-tilts in pitch. The fifth plot is motion of various OMC DoFs. It’s not clear why the beamsplitter is moving. It seems likely that the BS pitch resonance is the primary cause of the motion, but it may instead be tracking motion upstream. If the problem is the BS, maybe something is wrong with the local control or maybe some seismic noise is driving the resonance. It’s also not clear yet exactly how this couples in. These glitches do not look like scattering arches - they are too high in frequency, have no support at lower frequency, and also there’s no top part of an arch. So it may be jitter, or clipping. The best prediction of the glitches is the pitch position of SR2 as seen by the OSEM. One kind of glitch happens at the maxima, and one at the minima. The final attachment shows this. But we haven’t looked at all channels yet. Further work can be done by looking at other times when this kind of glitch occurs (GravitySpy can provide those), looking for the cause of the BS motion, and trying to find which of the alignment channels is the best predictor of the exact glitch times.
Measured both the filtered and DC output of the power stabilisation photodiode, a measurement that was limited at low frequencies by the noise of the SR785 (S/N 77457), which seemed to be somewhat higher than normal. The broad peak at ~45 kHz present is not present in the bias voltage, nor the power supply voltages. The photodiode showed no visible signs of damage. As a result I was reluctant to remove it from the circuit, plus it had the glass window taken off which makes it even more prone to damage if one was negligent. The filtered noise is consistent with the gain of 400 from the DC output. PDTF2.png shows the measured transfer function from the test point TFIN out to the test point X5 and the filtered output. Both are as they should be. Removed some extraneous flux from both sides of the circuit board, re-assembled the photodiode box and then re-installed it on the table. The sample output of the pre-modecleaner was aligned onto the photodiodes by peaking the DC output. The beam onto the internal quadrant photodiode was then re-positioned to zero the X and Y outputs as best as possible. The alignment into the pre-modecleaner was tweaked to try and minimize the free-running peak-to-peak fluctuations. The power incident on the photodiodes was adjusted so that the filtered output was not saturated. This seemed to be with a DC output of ~7.5V. Then power stabilisation was then engaged. Further alignment tweaks for the pre-modecleaner are probably warranted. Jason, Peter
State of H1: locked earlier, even showing a range, but earthquakes in the last 2 hours are preventing lock
On site: Commissioners Sheila and Evan, Operator Cheryl
Activities:
Sheila, Evan, Cheryl
With the ISS engaged were able to lock fine.
I edited the ISC_LOCK guardian to speed up DHARD_WFS a bit, it should be fine but we didn't get to test it because of a second Taiwan EQ.
About the demod phase: maybe due to the new decimation filters?
https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-T1600066
Also, see the attached.
Peter and Jason have just come out of the PSL. I will let them log their work in there.
But, the 3 of us were just sitting with Evan, and looking at our latest PSL RIN. It's unclear why there's a difference, but the RIN straight out of the HPO seems better now than it was previously. The first screen shot shows this, in that the blue traces for the PSL-PWR_HPL_DC_OUT is lower now than the equivalent traces in alog 26773. On the first screen shot, references are with the integrator off, current is with the integrator on. But, the ISS seems to not be doing anything, so we're not seeing a change when the integrator comes on, in the after-ISS PD.
The RIN into the vacuum is not very good (red and pink traces on the first plot). The second screen shot shows the RIN into the vacuum now with the ISS on versus 00:00:00 11Feb2016 with the ISS inner loop on. It's pretty clear that we're not getting the same RIN as we were during 01 with the inner loop closed.
Cheryl has already started the locking sequence for us, so we'll give things a try for the night as-is.
Yes, the RIN of the HPO, the FSS transmission, and the IMC transmission all seem a bit better compared to two weeks ago.
The new RCG3.0 has the ability to report the differences in filter files which have been modified but not loaded. In other words, it a modified filter file is detected, it tells you what would be added/deleted if you were to load the filters.
The !Diff button next to the "Modified File Detected" status opens an xterm which displays the differences. The lines are marked with preceding arrows and are color coded.
Right arrow ">" and BLUE are lines which will be REMOVED when the filters are loaded
Left arrow "<" and MAGENTA are lines which will be ADDED when the filters are loaded
As a test example, I modified the H1PEMMX.txt filter file and deleted the line "# MODULES" and added a line at the end of the file "# this filter will be added when coeff load is pressed". The resulting diff listing is shown below.
liquid levels have been oscillating all day in PID mode, with gain lowered from 6 to 5. I just lowered both to 4 and will test in PID mode overnight.
11:45 am local 1/2 turn open LLCV bypass valve. Took 12:00 min to overfill CP3 today at 20% LLCV open.
Took longer than usual to overfill at 20% open (from nominal 18%) because yesterday during maintenance the CP3 controls were disabled which caused the valve to want to close, except the shims (set to around 18%) kept it open.
Related log(s): 21131
Summary. - Today, I have updated the first anti-whitening filters of the OMC DCPDs in the OMC digital front end model in order to make them more accurately match the actual analog circuits. The attached show screenshots of the foton filters before and after the update.
Impact. - The new OMC DCPD responses are different from what they used to be by 1% at 10 Hz in magnitude and almost no change at 100Hz and above. The O2 DARM model must take this update into account. Note that even though the qualitative behavior of the mismatched anti-whitenings is similar to the large bias we have been seeing in the DARM response (for example 24569), they do not explain the bias (which is about 10% at 10 Hz in magnitude).
DCPD balancing. - According to my calculation, the balancing should be good at a 0.1% level without introducing an artificial imbalance in the OMC front end. So I removed the existing artificitial imbalace (-0.3%) and update the OBSERVE and DOWN SDFs. However, the imbalance should be experimentally double-checked and possibly re-adjusted.
Today, while Jenne and Sheila were re-tuning the OMC dither loops, I looked at the balance of two OMC DCPDs. The attached shows the null and sum spectra, and ratio between DCPD A and B.
The isolation between null and sum is as good as 66 dB, according to a injected line at 12 Hz (OM3 pitch by Jenne and Sheila). The two PDs match each other with a 0.1% level accuracy in magnitude and 0.1 deg level for the phase. This seems good enough for the moment. Though, we should check the responses above 100 Hz at some point.
Jeff K, Evan G
We (finally!) measured the ESD driver quadrant control voltage path transfer functions, which was needed because of the change made on Feb 9 (see ECR E1500341 and LHO aLOG 25468) for calibration/compensation use. Measurements are stored under
/ligo/svncommon/CalSVN/aligocalibration/trunk/Runs/PreER9/H1/Measurements/Electronics/2016-05-06
Measurement notes attached. Analysis to come...
The anaylsis is done.
I wrote a matlab analysis script which automatically fits all the measured transfer function by calling LISO. The script can be found in SVN at
/ligo/svncommon/CalSVN/aligocalibration/trunk/Runs/PreER9/H1/Scripts/model_ETMY_LVLN_driver_20160511.m
The results are attached and also can be found in SVN at
/ligo/svncommon/CalSVN/aligocalibration/trunk/Runs/PreER9/H1/Results/Electronics/2016-05-11_H1SUSETMY_ESD_LVLNDriver_*.pdf
An update:
Evan and Jeff pointed me out that I could have also subtracted the reference transfer function ( = the transfer function of the measurement setup, including SR785 and diff-to-single-ended-convertor). So I edited the code so that it subtracts the reference out of each measurement. This impacted mostly on the gain of each measruement which are now 1.88. The resulting pdfs are attached.
I have moved the analysis code to a slighlty place at:
/ligo/svncommon/CalSVN/aligocalibration/trunk/Runs/PreER9/H1/Scripts/Electronics/model_ETMY_LVLN_driver_20160511.m
The resulting pdfs are saved at the same location as the original ones.