Displaying reports 61901-61920 of 85671.Go to page Start 3092 3093 3094 3095 3096 3097 3098 3099 3100 End
Reports until 09:28, Wednesday 23 December 2015
H1 SEI (PEM, SEI)
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:28, Wednesday 23 December 2015 (24409)
Comparing changes in ETMX ISI and ETMY ISI as the useism increased

Plot shows ETMX and ETMY Stage 1 X loaction and Y location over the last 24 hours. 

During the last 24 hours, useism has increased from 0.4um/s to 1um/s.

ETMY ISI (left, top and bottom) shows a steady increase in the amplitude of the oscillations in X Location and Y Location.

ETMX ISI (right, top and bottom) shows an increase in the amplitude of the oscillations in X location and Y Location, however, the increase in amplitude of the signals, and the signals themselves are anything but "smooth."

Images attached to this report
H1 General
jeffrey.bartlett@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:17, Wednesday 23 December 2015 (24407)
Ops Owl Shift Summary
Activity Log: All Times in UTC (PT)

08:00 (00:00) Take over from TJ
12:00 (04:00) Dozens of ETM-Y saturations alarms concurrent with RF45 noise.
12:45 (04:45) Temperature alarm on CS Zone 4 duct. 
12:58 (04:58) Temperature alarm on CS Zone 1A duct.
13:27 (05:27) The ETM-Y/RF45 saturations have stopped.  
15:19 (07:19) Three ETM-Y/RF45 saturations in 8 seconds. 
15:44 (07:44) Bubba – Into the Cleaning area to get a headset 
15:46 (07:46) Bubba – out of the cleaning area
16:00 (08:00) Turn over to Cheryl 



End of Shift Summary:

Title: 12/22/2015, Owl Shift 08:00 – 16:00 (00:00 – 08:00) All times in UTC (PT)

Support:  
 
Incoming Operator: Cheryl

Shift Detail Summary: Starting at 12:00 (04:00) dozens of ETM-Y saturations with simultaneous RF45 saturations. These continued until 13:27 (05:27). There were a few additional saturations after 13:27.

Other than the RF45 saturations, it was a good night for data collection. Seismic and microseism continue to increase, as does the wind. 
  
H1 General
jeffrey.bartlett@LIGO.ORG - posted 05:00, Wednesday 23 December 2015 - last comment - 06:43, Wednesday 23 December 2015(24405)
RF45 Acting Up
   Starting at 12:00 (04:00) getting dozens of RF45 and concurrent ETM-Y saturations. By 12:55 (04:55) the rate of saturations had slowed but continues.   
Comments related to this report
jeffrey.bartlett@LIGO.ORG - 06:43, Wednesday 23 December 2015 (24406)
The last saturation was at 13:27 (05:27). 
H1 General
jeffrey.bartlett@LIGO.ORG - posted 04:10, Wednesday 23 December 2015 (24404)
Ops Owl Mid-Shift Summary
   A shift without drama so far, with the IFO locked and Observing with good range. Environmental conditions however are deteriorating. Wind speeds are up into the mid-teens, with several gusts over 20mph. Seismic trend is upward, with a few EY peeks well over 0.1um/s. Microseism also has an upward slope, centered around 0.8um/s.

   There are a couple of large storm systems moving through the Bering Sea and the Gulf of Alaska over the next few days. The data buoys on the Washington coast are recording near shore wave heights up to 16 feet and winds at near gale force (up to 38mph).       
H1 General
jeffrey.bartlett@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:14, Wednesday 23 December 2015 (24403)
Ops Owl Shift Transition
Title:  12/23/2015, Owl Shift 08:00 – 16:00 (00:00 – 08:00) All times in UTC (PT)
	
State of H1: 08:00 (00:00), The IFO is in Observing mode for the past 2.5 hours. Power and range are at normal levels. Wind is currently a gentle breeze (8-12mph) and building. Seismic and microseism are both rising as well. Monitoring CP-3 N2 levels.     

Outgoing Operator: TJ
LHO General
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:00, Wednesday 23 December 2015 (24402)
Ops Eve Shift Transition
LHO General
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:42, Tuesday 22 December 2015 (24401)
Observing 05:35

Back to Observing.

Lost lock a few times when trying to switch from PRMI to DRMI (shot attached). After I would lock PRMI, adjust to maximize the signals, then try to transfer, it wouldn't work so it would then try to lock DRMI. After a few minutes it would seem like it would lock but then look as though it was trying to transfer again. Hard for me to describe it. Also lost lost once at Coil Drivers, but other than that it wasn't anything out of the ordinary.

Images attached to this report
LHO General
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 20:01, Tuesday 22 December 2015 - last comment - 20:58, Tuesday 22 December 2015(24399)
Lockloss 03:59

Not sure why yet, everything was looking great.

Comments related to this report
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - 20:58, Tuesday 22 December 2015 (24400)

This shows me nothing helpful. Generic Lockloss plots attached.

Images attached to this comment
H1 CAL (AOS, CAL)
sudarshan.karki@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:52, Tuesday 22 December 2015 (24398)
Pcal ENDY PD Calibration

SudarshanK, DarkhanT, EvanG

Pcal PD Calibrationat at ENDY was completed today. The results are within the variation seen in the past. A more detail report coming soon.

Non-image files attached to this report
LHO General
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:10, Tuesday 22 December 2015 (24397)
Ops Eve Transition
LHO VE
kyle.ryan@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:56, Tuesday 22 December 2015 (24394)
Plugged line for CP3 level indication
Kyle, Bubba 

Today we decoupled both ends of the external 3/8 tubing used to sense the liquid pressure sampled at the bottom of CP3's inner LN2 vessel -> We then blew through it with bottled UHP N2 to verify that it wasn't the source of obstruction -> Next, we reconnected the end at the vacuum interface and pressurized the tubing to 15-20 psi in an attempt to "blow" the obstruction back into the liquid vessel.  We also tried "pumping" the line to rough vacuum -> A second attempt at pressurizing it, this time to 30 psi, did not dislodge the obstruction

1500 hrs. local -> Manually overfilled CP3 via the LLCV bypass circuit (liquid exiting exhaust line) 

We will manually top off pump periodically until issue is resolved -> The LLCV is in manual mode at a constant 15% open (recent average prior to problem was ~19% open) 
H1 General (OpsInfo)
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:43, Tuesday 22 December 2015 - last comment - 16:10, Tuesday 22 December 2015(24393)
Ops Day Shift: H1 relocked and in Observe

State of H1: Low Noise, A2L measurements finished, now in Observe

JeffK and I talked to LLO, and they are working on a measurement, and expect to be back in Observe soon.

Help with Mantenance and Relocking: Kiwamu, JimW, Ed, JeffK, Jenne

Relocking Details/Issues:

  1. MICH DARK did not lock.  It WAS well aligned, but would not catch.  MICH DARK is needed for end of O1 calibraitons, so some effort to lock and or diagnose the issue was made, and not successful.
  2. H1 broke lock at ENGAGE_ASC twice, and JimW offered that sitting in each part, part 1, part 2, and part 3, and waiting for ASC signals to settle each time, has helped get H1 through those steps.  This issue and the necessary work around are new in the last two weeks.
  3. H1 then stalled at engaging the ISS 2nd Loop, which had to be engaged manually.

Currently: H1 in Observe at 23:24:36UTC, and as of this alog, range is 80Mpc.

Comments related to this report
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - 16:05, Tuesday 22 December 2015 (24395)

Ops Day Summary: 16:00-23:59UTC, 08:00-16:00PT

State of H1: Observe for 44 minutes, range is 80Mpc

Current state of the site:

  • useism is around 0.5um/s
  • winds are 0-10mph across the site
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - 16:10, Tuesday 22 December 2015 (24396)

I just notinced that CP3 LT200 is again 0!

It seemed to be working again earlier today, but seems to have failed again, or something.

There's an earlier algo/alogs from VAC with more info.

H1 SEI
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:37, Tuesday 22 December 2015 - last comment - 14:39, Tuesday 22 December 2015(24390)
Corner station BSCs Z blends changed to 45mhz

A few weeks ago, Hugh switched the end station BSC Z blends to 45 mhz. We've done a bit of looking at this, and it seems okay, so this morning I switched the CS BSCs to 45s on Z as well. First attached plot shows the improvement in the Z direction on ITMX, the BS and ITMY were very similar so I'm not posting them. The green lines are the ST1 T240 ASD (solid) and RMS (dashed) with the Quite_90 blend, brown is the T240 ASD (solid) and RMS (dashed) with the 45 mhz blends. Purple is the ground from when the 90mhz blends were engage, black is the ground with 45mhz. We were getting a factor of 3 to 5 suppression of the microseism, with the 45 mhz blends we get a factor of ~40. There is some increased motion in the 20-80 mhz region, but the RMS of the ISI is still lower.

One possible problem with running the 45 mhz blends in Z is increased coupling to St1 RZ. I've looked at the local ISI sensors, and this doesn't seem to be affecting us yet. In fact, the T240s (which are suspect because of Z/RZ coupling) and the CPSs both show less motion at the microseism with the 45mhz blends, second plot, red and green are CPS and T240 RZ with 90mhz blends, blue and brown are CPS and T240 RZ with 45mhz blends. Additionally, The RZ drive doesn't seem to be significantly different, implying that we aren't contaminating RZ with increased Z drive (third plot, pink is with the 90mhz blends, light blue is with the 45mhz blends). After we relock today, I'll try to do a comparison with the ASC controls from last night.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - 14:39, Tuesday 22 December 2015 (24391)

This is the same configuration the LLO runs on their BSCs. Arnaud made this change a while ago, Hugh and I just took our time catching up...

H1 General (OpsInfo)
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:35, Tuesday 22 December 2015 - last comment - 08:19, Wednesday 23 December 2015(24384)
The sound settings on the alarm handler computer

The volume for the alarms were so very quiet this morning I couldn't hear them, and the volume for the verbal alarms was reasonable, and of course, when I tried to raise the alarm volume, the verbal alarms were too loud.

JimB discovered that the sound settings on the computer are seperated into "alarms" and "computer" volume sliders, and the alarm volume was set very low.

I discovered that to have the alarm volume about the same as the verbal alarm volume, the volume on the alarms needs to be at max. and the verbal alarms need to be at about 1/2 of the total possible volume.  

Picture attached.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - 08:19, Wednesday 23 December 2015 (24408)

I added System Preferences to the toolbar so it's easy to find.

Snapshot attached show the toolbar and System Preferences when open.

In the System Preferences window, open Sound (second line down, furthest to the right).

Images attached to this comment
H1 SEI (CDS, GRD)
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:24, Tuesday 22 December 2015 - last comment - 14:50, Tuesday 22 December 2015(24388)
STS2 Mass Centering + Woes + New Check Script
J. Kissel, H. Radkins, J. Warner [+ J. Driggers and E. Hall for code assistance]

After Hugh had gone down to the end-stations to check the centering of the STS-2s (aLOG pending), we looked back at Brian's LHO aLOG 22985 that reminds us that we digitally store the mass centering information. There were a few mysteries still associated with those channels, however, namely whether they were the X/Y/Z mass positions or U/V/W mass positions. As such, we went out the CER / SEI racks with a DVM and toggled some switches. We learned several things:
(1) The output of the X/U, Y/V, and Z/W BNC spigots are proportional to each of the stored IOP ADC EPICs channels 
(2) To match them up, one must account not only for the 40/2^16 [Vpp/ct] ADC gain, but the gain difference of 2.0 [V_adc/V_spigot] between the spigot and the ADC channel because of the single-ended-to-differential driver in the STS interface chassis (see D040019, pg 5 specifically). Thus, to turn the ADC channel back into the volts which the STS-2 manual recommends for being less that 1.5 [V], one must multiply by (1/2) * (40/2^16) = (20/2^16) = 3.0518e-04 [V/ct].
(3) All of the corner station STS chassis had their XYX / UVW switches toggled to XYZ.
(4) The spigots are marked as "X/U", "Y/V", and "Z/W," the output of which (either X/Y/Z or U/V/W) should be controllable by the rocker switch to the right of the spigots (see attached image). However, Hugh and I toggled this switch on all three STS2 chassis in the corner station, and when toggled to U/V/W, the spigot output went to 0.0 [V] (maybe occassionally we'd see a ~1 [mV] offset) and the ADC readout went to ADC-noise-level zero. So either we're missing something, or the U/V/W readout functionality is busted on these chassis. Hopefully, it's busted in the "it never worked" sense, and the X/Y/Z readout *is* actually the U/V/W readout, and we're constantly monitoring it. 

Hurumph.

Anyways, as a by-product of this investigation, I (with the help of Jenn and Evan) wrote a python script called /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/isi/common/scripts/check_sts_centering.py that takes a 10 second average of these IOP channels (ifo is an input argument, but otherwise hard-coded to be the IOP channels mentioned in Brian's aLOG), calibrates them into "STS Volts," compares them against the 2 [V] threshold, and spits out whether an STS on site ios out-of-spec. Here's today's results, to show how the script works: 
/opt/rtcds/userapps/release/isi/common/scripts$ ./check_sts_centering.py H1
Averaging Mass Centering channels for 10 [sec] ...


There are 3 STS proof masses out of range ( > 2.0 [V] )!
STS B DOF X/U = -4.446 [V]
STS EX DOF Y/V = 7.656 [V]
STS EY DOF Z/W = -2.429 [V]


All other proof masses are within range ( < 2.0 [V] ):
STS A DOF X/U = 0.367 [V]
STS A DOF Y/V = -1.019 [V]
STS A DOF Z/W = -0.359 [V]
STS B DOF Y/V = 0.751 [V]
STS B DOF Z/W = -0.422 [V]
STS C DOF X/U = 0.88 [V]
STS C DOF Y/V = -0.508 [V]
STS C DOF Z/W = -1.313 [V]
STS EX DOF X/U = -1.112 [V]
STS EX DOF Z/W = 1.111 [V]
STS EY DOF X/U = 1.025 [V]
STS EY DOF Y/V = 0.828 [V]


Assessment complete.
/opt/rtcds/userapps/release/isi/common/scripts$


We intend to, for now and now that it's so easy, check the STS centering every maintanence day. As Jenne suggests, we could take the script up another 10 levels and code it up as a guardian monitoring node for the SYS_DIAG to watch that'll then notify the operator only when it has surpassed the threshold, that way we don't have to remember to check. But we'll leave that for another scripter for another day. Script has been committed for use at both sites.
Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - 14:50, Tuesday 22 December 2015 (24392)

JeffK HughR

BTL notified us that we were operating with the mass of the STS2 at EndY out of nominal position (>1.5V)  Outside of this range the instrument noise gets worse.

Checking the FP U/X V/Y & W/Z POS BNC spigots on the STS2 Chassis in the CER showed that the Voltage read on these monitor points correspond to the ADC counts on:

H1:IOP-SEI_EY_MADC3_EPICS_CH20
H1:IOP-SEI_EY_MADC3_EPICS_CH21
H1:IOP-SEI_EY_MADC3_EPICS_CH22

the other STSs should be at
   - end X -
H1:IOP-SEI_EX_MADC3_EPICS_CH20
H1:IOP-SEI_EX_MADC3_EPICS_CH21
H1:IOP-SEI_EX_MADC3_EPICS_CH22

and for the 3 in the corner station

S1:IOP-SEI_[B1|B2|B3]_MADC3_EPICS_CH[20|21|22]

Attached are 100 day trends of the instruments we are currently using.  These say 2/3rds have been out of spec(>~5000cts) for the duration and don't tend to wander/drift too much.

After centering today (twice at the end stations,) 1/3 still are out of range.

Images attached to this comment
Displaying reports 61901-61920 of 85671.Go to page Start 3092 3093 3094 3095 3096 3097 3098 3099 3100 End